Related time notes
- Britain's Rearmament 1937 vs 2026: What Lessons are we forgetting?23:58Britain's defence treaties across changing governmentsChapter
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:40:58Agincourt proposals and an 18-inch Washington Treaty limitQ&A
- Royal Navy Destroyers of WWI...1:14:37What if the cancelled destroyers had been completed?Notable Point
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live55:27Italian carriers and a different London treatyQ&A
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:02:50Twelve-gun fast Admirals and the treaty balanceQ&A
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:38:47The Washington Treaty's carrier limitsQ&A
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?1:22:35A fast battle line changes treaty bargainingChapter
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?0:00What would delaying the Washington Treaty until 1927 change?Q&A
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?1:12Two new battleships in exchange for four older shipsChapter
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?2:52National tonnage quotas and fleets of 35,000-ton shipsChapter
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?4:24Why 35,000 tons excludes the emerging postwar generationChapter
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?6:11British war debt and the limits of financial compulsionChapter
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?12:52Japan gains from war without the same debt burdenNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?13:40Why naval parity with Italy constrains FranceNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?15:32Peace promises and a pause to absorb wartime lessonsChapter
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?17:31The arms race moves into treaty cruisersNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?17:55Carrier limits force choices between hull numbers and capabilityChapter
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?24:07How navies stretch treaty limitsNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?25:25Italy’s advantage and France’s interrupted naval responseChapter
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?27:19A seven-to-ten Japanese ratio and small capital shipsNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?32:35Failed negotiations leave ships as bargaining countersChapter
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?42:23British requirements for a large, survivable carrierNotable Point
- Momi to Kagero - The Story of the Japanese 1920s & 1930s Destroyer Program1:14Treaty limits and the work of Japanese shipyardsNotable Point
- Momi to Kagero - The Story of the Japanese 1920s & 1930s Destroyer Program59:49Could Japan have built more large destroyers before London?Notable Point
- Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live26:51Cruiser gun calibres without the Washington limitQ&A
- 14 Acts and 7 Classes - the story of the USN Interwar Destroyers46:59The First Cruiser Act modernized presence ships and omitted destroyersChapter
- Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...52:23Four Italian light carriers would strain the treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:56:41The Washington Treaty becomes a personhood dispute in Azur LaneQ&A
- America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class28:47Why did navies avoid building every carrier at the maximum size?Q&A
- America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class30:32The Hawkins-based limit and the missing middle-sized cruiserNotable Point
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live28:56How completed N3s could enlarge YamatoQ&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:22:28Queen Elizabeths with 16.5-inch guns reshape the naval raceQ&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:46:03Converting battlecruisers into fast troop transportsQ&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live4:06:38Larger Queen Elizabeths price Germany out of the naval raceQ&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live4:08:35M3 and N3 under a 50,000-ton treaty limitQ&A
- What happens if WWII took place as scheduled... after 1942? (Patreon)4:25:44A treaty cruiser based on armoured-cruiser precedentQ&A
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 210:57Lexington battlecruisers built with Hood-style protectionQ&A
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 216:18A Tiger-like Hood and the Washington treatyQ&A
- Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:41:31A hidden second Admiral-class battlecruiser and treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:59:18How extra signatories could break naval treaty negotiationsQ&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:02:09Existing orders at the Washington Naval TreatyQ&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:25:12The cruiser red line at WashingtonQ&A
- What would need to change for HMAS Australia & HMS New Zealand to be retained under Washington?0:24What would let Australia and New Zealand survive Washington?Q&A
- What would need to change for HMAS Australia & HMS New Zealand to be retained under Washington?15:38Why the Indefatigable class had no strong Washington caseChapter
- What would need to change for HMAS Australia & HMS New Zealand to be retained under Washington?34:39A separate Washington category could preserve battlecruisersChapter
- What would need to change for HMAS Australia & HMS New Zealand to be retained under Washington?40:49A separate Kongo allowance could fund more NagatosNotable Point
- What would need to change for HMAS Australia & HMS New Zealand to be retained under Washington?41:56Five Lexingtons would create an American fast wingChapter
- What would need to change for HMAS Australia & HMS New Zealand to be retained under Washington?44:06Speed could define a separate treaty battlecruiser categoryNotable Point
- What would need to change for HMAS Australia & HMS New Zealand to be retained under Washington?51:49Britain could divide its allowance among three battlecruisersNotable Point
- What would need to change for HMAS Australia & HMS New Zealand to be retained under Washington?56:51New battleships could give Japan a treaty successNotable Point
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:29:51Why French and Italian cruisers favored twin turretsQ&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:02:23South American naval powers in the treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:32:42Canada buying Admiral-class battlecruisers after World War IQ&A
- Bruships 247: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...30:00Four Admiral-class battlecruisers would reshape treaty fleetsNotable Point
- Bruships 247: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...36:04Carrier numbers depend on total treaty tonnageNotable Point
- What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?11:00Washington treaty rules block the historical Tiger gun changeChapter
- What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?32:07A 15-inch standardization bargain changes the treaty pathChapter
- What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?50:48Accepting Tiger may be cheaper than reopening the treaty bargainNotable Point
- What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?54:24Treaty tonnage could produce three or four F3-style capital shipsChapter
- What if HMS Hermes was the first of a class of Cruiser Carriers?4:08Carrier tonnage limits turn ship size into an availability problemChapter
- What if HMS Hermes was the first of a class of Cruiser Carriers?5:50Experimental-carrier rules give Britain an early replacement advantageNotable Point
- What if HMS Hermes was the first of a class of Cruiser Carriers?7:22Large carrier conversions expose the cost of using scarce tonnageNotable Point
- What if HMS Hermes was the first of a class of Cruiser Carriers?12:18Carrier gun limits and the alternative of a cruiser escortNotable Point
- What if HMS Hermes was the first of a class of Cruiser Carriers?13:09The 10,000-ton threshold opens an uncapped cruiser-carrier routeChapter
- Bruships 244: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:32:13How larger Hawkins cruisers would shift treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 242: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:16:07Hood's armor changes and the risk of cancellationQ&A
- Bruships 242: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:20:49Four J3 battlecruisers and a larger treaty baselineNotable Point
- Bruships 242: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:27:45The cost argument against a 16.5-inch Colorado reboreQ&A
- Bruships 242: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:30:04Where a treaty-free battleship gun race would plateauQ&A
- Bruships 242: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:34:46Could Japan afford a fleet without the Washington treaty?Q&A
- Bruships 242: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:03:32An American Hood and the Washington treaty ceilingQ&A
- Bruships 241: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:49:18German naval design without Versailles limitsQ&A
- Bruships 240: Naval History Questions Answered Live...41:44F3 battlecruiser protection tradeoffsQ&A
- Bruships 240: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:34:22Replacing Renown after a 1927 machinery fireQ&A
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)1:57:28Washington limits need a political settlementQ&A
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)2:18:20Standard displacement belongs to the treaty systemQ&A
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)2:19:43Carrier construction was already underway before WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships17:33Seventy cruisers and treaty bargainingQ&A
- Special Catch Up Ramblings on Behalf of @TheFleetOfOceans1:28:08Trading Hood for an F3 battlecruiser programQ&A
- Special Catch Up Ramblings on Behalf of @TheFleetOfOceans1:33:36F3s, a common 15-inch gun, and continuous yard workNotable Point
- Bruships 238: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:41:24US battleships standardized on triple 14-inch turretsQ&A
- Bruships 238: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:29:04France's bargaining position at WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 236: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:33:29Dutch ownership of German capital ships after World War IQ&A
- Bruships 236: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:36:29How Dutch capital ships could change carrier procurementNotable Point
- Bruships 236: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:38:10A larger treaty allowance for Nelsons, F3s and WashingtonNotable Point
- Bruships 236: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:33:16Building Number 13 battlecruisers instead of YamatoQ&A
- Bruships 235: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:51:02Why the Royal Navy did not fight to keep the Iron DukesQ&A
- What if the Royal Navy's Aircraft Carrier HMS Hermes had sisters in the 1920s? (Patreon Live)1:30:06Would navies trade battleships for 35,000-ton carriers in 1922?Q&A
- Bruships 234: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:45:51Cancelled classes that would have changed later fleetsQ&A
- Bruships 233: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:44:25Dutch battlecruisers before the Washington TreatyQ&A
- Modern Chinese Destroyers: How the Current People's Liberation Army Navy's surface ships came to be53:34Keeping the Anglo-Japanese Alliance at WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...31:31A Pacific without the Washington Treaty's fortification limitsQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:53:54Arming a penny-pinching interwar battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:55:28Replacing a battleship lost during the treaty periodQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:12:33A 25-capital-ship Washington Treaty fleetQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:17:15A larger treaty fleet with a construction holidayQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:30:25A heavily funded Royal Indian Navy after 1922Q&A
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?0:00How selective cheating kept the Washington Treaty aliveNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?3:46How standard displacement could hide wartime weightChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?9:55Carrier definitions leave aviation weight open to argumentChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?13:40Why mutual cheating discouraged formal accusationsNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?17:26The sub-10,000-ton carrier escape hatchChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?21:22Cruiser turrets shared with coastal batteriesNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?33:13G3 conversions anchor a five-carrier strike forceChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?37:32A separate proposal for five declared 27,000-ton carriersNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?1:02:01Why Lexington's 8-inch guns waste carrier capacityChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?1:10:09Why Britain declined a Hermes-derived small carrierNotable Point
- Who was to blame for Norway falling in 1940?25:01Oscarsborg's old guns concealed decades of neglected modernizationChapter
- Bruships 227: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:49:15Australia already had a capital ship before WashingtonNotable Point
- Bruships 227: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:27:14Would Canada retain four Renown-class battlecruisers?Q&A
- Bruships 227: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:28:22Could Canadian Renowns produce a 28-knot Admiral fast battleship?Q&A
- Naval Architecture from Turret Ironclads to Super Dreadnoughts: HMS Monarch 1868 & 1911...44:03How a fourteen-inch Orion could have changed later gun choicesNotable Point
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:54:42Why a capital ship does not have to be a battleshipNotable Point
- What if the Royal Navy carried out a carrier strike against Wilhelmshaven in WWI? Patreon Live55:11Britain's carrier force before the Washington TreatyQ&A
- What if the Royal Navy carried out a carrier strike against Wilhelmshaven in WWI? Patreon Live1:03:40Could an early Hermes have become an amphibious ship?Q&A
- What if the Royal Navy carried out a carrier strike against Wilhelmshaven in WWI? Patreon Live2:05:36Why the counterfactual supplies no pre-Washington carrier countQ&A
- What if the Royal Navy carried out a carrier strike against Wilhelmshaven in WWI? Patreon Live2:06:18Would the Washington Treaty or Pacific War still happen?Q&A
- What if the Royal Navy carried out a carrier strike against Wilhelmshaven in WWI? Patreon Live2:13:08How carriers and battleships evolve without treaty limitsQ&A
- Why the different major navies used Cruiser Aviation in the 1920s&30s...21:21French cruisers carry a global mission on treaty displacementChapter
- Scuttlebutt 17: Missiles, Guns & Other Barrels of Fun24:03Why ten-inch naval guns miss the useful calibre stepsQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 17: Missiles, Guns & Other Barrels of Fun27:24G3 battlecruisers with 16.5-inch guns before the Washington TreatyNotable Point
- Bruships 224: Alternate Naval History Questions Answered Live...35:19Spanish super-battleships strain the treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships 224: Alternate Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:20:52Why Audacious and Queen Mary still face scrappingQ&A
- Bruships 224: Alternate Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:04:59Saving HMS Lion as a memorialQ&A
- Bruships 224: Alternate Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:36:18Dutch battlecruisers enter the Washington negotiationsQ&A
- Bruships 224: Alternate Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:58:56A united Scandinavia enters capital-ship limitationQ&A
- What changes if the Royal Navy gets a Proper Staff in 1905, instead relying on NID for everything?1:11:36Dominion sea power changes the postwar treaty problemChapter
- Lions not Indefatigables - the Dominions chose to build 13.5in Battlecruisers prior to WWI...58:29Can the extra Lions predict the postwar treaty balance?Q&A
- Lions not Indefatigables - the Dominions chose to build 13.5in Battlecruisers prior to WWI...2:07:12Faster R-class ships and eight-gun RenownsNotable Point
- Lions not Indefatigables - the Dominions chose to build 13.5in Battlecruisers prior to WWI...2:26:53Fast-battleship convergence and the Admiral classQ&A
- Lions not Indefatigables - the Dominions chose to build 13.5in Battlecruisers prior to WWI...2:31:49Could the Washington treaty disappear?Q&A
- Bruships 223: Naval History & Science Fiction Questions Answered Live...1:14:57Bismarck and the naval treaty systemNotable Point
- Bruships 223: Naval History & Science Fiction Questions Answered Live...3:52:00Choosing a battlecruiser's gun caliberQ&A
- Planning for Pearl Harbor: Decisions to Strike at the USN's mid-pacific base...10:23The treaty ratio turns insecurity into planning pressureNotable Point
- Planning for Pearl Harbor: Decisions to Strike at the USN's mid-pacific base...30:18The Pensacola class keeps its scout-cruiser roleNotable Point
- Chatting Books, Amazon & Youtube with Glynn Stewart: #2historians #scifi33:04Naval treaty expectations and uncertainty about space weaponsNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 14: Aircraft Carriers35:18Lexington-class ships split across capital-ship rolesQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 14: Aircraft Carriers38:22Lexington's eight-inch guns and the cruiser treaty limitsNotable Point
- More Lessons of Never Built Carriers4:22Treaty tonnage forced armor-versus-air-group choicesNotable Point
- More Lessons of Never Built Carriers20:34A French hybrid carrier tried to fit colonial roles into 20,000 tonsChapter
- More Lessons of Never Built Carriers23:40U.S. baby carriers could extend cruiser scoutingChapter
- More Lessons of Never Built Carriers24:13Ryujo and Commandant Teste show different answers to limited tonnageNotable Point
- Carriers for Christmas: French Aircraft Carriers 1920-2000 & Japanese Aircraft Carriers 1920-454:25Commandant Teste as a mobile aviation baseChapter
- Carriers for Christmas: French Aircraft Carriers 1920-2000 & Japanese Aircraft Carriers 1920-4512:20Seaplane-carrier economy versus fleet-carrier flexibilityNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle19:18What if Britain rejected the Washington Naval Treaty?Q&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle26:57US Navy priorities without the Washington Naval TreatyQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…1:01:05The treaty loophole for interwar escort fleetsNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…1:10:00What an early naval-treaty escalator clause changesQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…1:10:50Did the interwar naval treaties make matters better?Q&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…1:14:33Italy's strategic aims in the treaty settlementNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…1:15:04Japan's desired 70 percent treaty ratioNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…1:47:31How an Allied Ottoman Empire complicates naval arms controlChapter
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…1:51:27More treaty participants mean more arguments over naval rankQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon3:39:49Why theater geography matters when swapping the RN and USNQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War7:13:08How building holidays weakened Japanese confidenceNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War8:42:34A Washington treaty without a building holidayQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust1:09:05How a stable republican China could disrupt naval arms limitsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust1:27:06How a 1920s South American arms race could break the treaty holidayQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust2:51:23How the Hawkins class set an outdated treaty-cruiser templateQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust5:48:39Why a three-tier cruiser treaty would squeeze out the middle classQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust5:55:31How Hawkins armament could shape later cruiser treaty limitsNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust7:31:15How a larger Spanish fleet could reshape naval treaty limitsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust7:47:45The better Bearn conversion France did not chooseQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust7:52:45Bearn's protective coal and Washington Treaty displacementNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust47:29What an early end to naval treaties does to the 1930s fleet raceQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust58:18How different Washington Treaty retentions reshape the Royal NavyQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust1:10:26How far an equitable capital-ship treaty might expandQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust1:19:03What the naval treaties allowed shipbuilders to exportQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust1:21:09Why treaty export construction differed from disposing of warshipsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust4:48:31Trading nuclear technology for war-debt cancellationQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress1:46:20If the Lord Nelson class had defeated GoebenQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida1:41:41Three naval books to take to the Admiralty in 1905Q&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida6:00:16What Britain might demand for additional treaty scrappingQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida6:53:08A Dutch G3 battlecruiser before the Washington conferenceQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida9:37:24Building the Japanese entry in a treaty-cruiser game challengeNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida9:42:24Could full-load claims conceal an overweight treaty cruiser?Q&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II1:14:18If the R class became Fisher-style battlecruisersQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II1:30:03Converting the Admiral class into strike carriersQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II6:38:06Favourite treaty cruisers and the limits of the categoryQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II8:38:08Four American Tigers with 16-inch guns before the First World WarQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy I44:47Designing a treaty-free 1928 armored cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:37:38Four carrier conversions under a looser treatyQ&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:05:20Amagi survives the earthquake as a battlecruiserQ&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:23:09Ryūjō and the logic of treaty loopholesQ&A
- Bruships 217: Back from Japan 2025: Jetlag is a Myth - Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:35:15Would heavy 1918 losses produce N3 battleships?Q&A
- Bruships 217: Back from Japan 2025: Jetlag is a Myth - Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:54:25Carrier choices after losing the Courageous classQ&A
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?0:00Why Dominion navies shared Britain's treaty allocationChapter
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?3:19Treaty export rules meet wartime requisitionNotable Point
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?5:56The strategic gamble behind Washington disarmamentNotable Point
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?11:31British bargaining leverage at WashingtonNotable Point
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?11:31A battlecruiser category for Dominion flagshipsChapter
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?46:44American battle-line politics enable the compromiseNotable Point
- Bruships 215 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...10:18How Mikasa survived the naval treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 215 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...41:37Could surplus treaty ships remain useful abroad?Q&A
- Bruships 215 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:01:41A 45,000-ton Washington treaty limitQ&A
- #Japan2025 #ShipShape naval history trip... update Last Day Aboard Mikasa!1:53Mikasa's unusual preservation under the Washington Naval TreatyQ&A
- Bruships 214 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:00:08Who could use surplus treaty-era warshipsQ&A
- What if the High Seas Fleet was not Scuttled in Scapa Flow?26:16The fragile politics behind naval limitationChapter
- What if the High Seas Fleet was not Scuttled in Scapa Flow?27:52Qualitative versus quantitative naval racesNotable Point
- What if the High Seas Fleet was not Scuttled in Scapa Flow?29:28Why naval construction has wider industrial effectsNotable Point
- What if the High Seas Fleet was not Scuttled in Scapa Flow?48:12German technology sparks a naval construction boomChapter
- What if the High Seas Fleet was not Scuttled in Scapa Flow?1:00:38An intact fleet breaks the historical 5:5:3 ratioChapter
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:56:12Dominion battlecruisers as dry-dock policyQ&A
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:25:23Scrapping under Washington versus scuttling after VersaillesQ&A
- #2Historians Live: With @Drachinifel comes to chat & build UAD Dreadnoughts that Almost were P332:08Italy's 1929 answer to the Nelson classChapter
- Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...12:42Admiral-class carrier conversions reshape WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:53:49How giant imperial dry docks change interwar capital shipsQ&A
- Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:02:20Fitting giant I3 carrier conversions into a treaty ratioNotable Point
- Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:56:56Why Washington defined an aircraft carrier above 10,000 tonsNotable Point
- Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:59:02The Royal Navy's unrealized cruiser-carrier optionQ&A
- Bruships 210: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:41:31How the Caracciolo class could upset Washington treaty arithmeticQ&A
- Bruships 209: Science Fiction Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:41:19Tiger as a possible replacement for HMAS AustraliaQ&A
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?50:37Should Britain have chosen F3 instead of Nelson and Rodney?Q&A
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?53:23An early replacement bargain could have produced four F3sNotable Point
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?2:22:10Limited building could have kept battleship design evolvingNotable Point
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...25:38The machinery cost of a 28-knot NagatoQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...29:14Why lengthening Nagato would expose the scale of a rebuildQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:16:41Admiral-class ships with 16.5-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:20:31Who might use a hypothetical 17-inch treaty limit?Q&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:25:45Why a twenty-ship tonnage allowance could support more hullsQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:50:07Six Nelsons under a twenty-capital-ship treatyQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:55:24Would France build larger Dunkerques or more of them?Q&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:41:01How a 15,000-ton cruiser reshapes WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:42:15Light carriers beneath a hypothetical 16,000-ton treaty thresholdNotable Point
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...6:32:16A 1920s Empire cruiser follows the County-class patternQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...6:39:01An unscuttled High Seas Fleet and American treaty choicesQ&A
- Bruships 207: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:52:18A 12,000-ton treaty cruiser with 9.2-inch gunsQ&A
- Sir Eustace Tennyson d'Eyncourt: WWI Royal Navy's Director of Naval Construction34:21Hawkins-class cruisers bridge war and imperial presenceChapter
- Sir Eustace Tennyson d'Eyncourt: WWI Royal Navy's Director of Naval Construction38:43The 9.2-inch cruiser that might have raised the treaty ceilingNotable Point
- Bruships 206: Naval History Questions Answered Live...37:02A larger Royal Navy reshapes WashingtonQ&A
- Procurement for Peace: Second Draft1:57:12Where to learn modern warship typesQ&A
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...16:55Changing Washington Treaty construction limitsQ&A
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:25:48How the Washington Treaty treated existing shipsQ&A
- Queen Bees: The almost 'Original Drones' from the 1930s25:29Why Argus was worth investing in through 1942Notable Point
- WWII Submarines that served the Polish, Greek, Dutch & Norwegian Navys35:59Why interwar navies hesitated over submarine minesNotable Point
- Bruships 204: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:45:44A 15-inch gun limit at the Washington Naval ConferenceQ&A
- Bruships 204: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:57:31A naval treaty that limits numbers without stopping constructionQ&A
- Bruships 204: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:59:43Why continued treaty-era construction could replace Renown and Repulse before TigerNotable Point
- Admiral Richardson: The USN's Japan War Seer & First Casualty of Roosevelts Hawaii Gambit22:56Fuel, USS Nevada, and the Yangtze PatrolChapter
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:46:10Britain abandons battleships for 9.2-inch cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:49:13Political and technical reasons for a cruiser-only Royal NavyNotable Point
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:09:53An Italian interwar carrier forceQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:13:04Italian and French completions reopen the treaty building holidayNotable Point
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:15:35Hood built as a K3 battlecruiserQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:19:42A J3 Hood, dual-purpose secondaries, and higher treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:16:38A faster four-shaft Nelson designQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:17:37County cruisers with twelve eight-inch guns and detachable armourQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:19:32Peacetime displacement and extra wartime ammunitionNotable Point
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:53:35The Çanak Crisis becomes a warQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:57:50Using a Çanak war to complete Admiral-class carriersQ&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:30:27Why modernizing the Tennessee-class cruisers was unattractiveQ&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:35:25A larger treaty cruiser limit would help Tennessee's rivalsNotable Point
- Why didn't the Royal Navy go for High Pressure boilers & what if they got 850psi boilers in 1934?0:23What changes when 850 psi boilers arrive in 1934?Q&A
- Attacking Pearl Harbour: The Decisions that led to the Japanese Planning…19:03The Washington treaty pushed Japan toward an offensive solutionNotable Point
- Bruships 201: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:13:07When a US-Japanese war might begin without naval treatiesQ&A
- Chūichi Nagumo: The Creation of the Kidō Butai's Kaigun Chūjō18:44The Fleet Faction's treaty security dilemmaNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 12: Not Pocket Battleships, No Guadalcanal and a load of Submarine Signals?0:11Why the Deutschland class were cruisers, not capital shipsQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 12: Not Pocket Battleships, No Guadalcanal and a load of Submarine Signals?33:20Treaty tonnage forced carrier armor and air-group compromisesNotable Point
- Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:58:54A third Lexington-class carrierQ&A
- Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:07:27A treaty exception for three fast capital shipsQ&A
- Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:32:11Three Incomparable-class battlecruisers after 1918Q&A
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?2:53:38Would Dominion capital ships survive into World War II?Q&A
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?3:10:26What would later naval treaties regulate?Q&A
- Admiral Nelles: The man who built the Royal Canadian Navy of WWII23:35The interwar sloop opportunity Canada missedNotable Point
- Bruships 198: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:23:48Early 16-inch/50 guns could reshape the Washington treatyQ&A
- Bruships 198: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:17:51A higher treaty ratio gives Japan more ships, not a new fleet conceptQ&A
- Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...34:08How a 9.2- to 10-inch cruiser limit reshapes treaty fleetsQ&A
- Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:00:18Why German Bayern-class prizes would complicate WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:36:07Why treaty battleships studied 16-inch twin turretsQ&A
- Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:47:49Why equal post-Jutland fleets would fail at WashingtonQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 11: from SDSR to Pearl Harbor, with a stop at CVA-01 along the way...23:19Who gained most from the interwar naval treaty system?Q&A
- Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:00:07How an 18-inch-gunned Furious could reshape naval treatiesQ&A
- Battle of Tsushima: Leadership, Logisitics and Lessons to be learned1:51:31Japan's decisive-battle lesson and its dangersChapter
- Battle of Tsushima: Leadership, Logisitics and Lessons to be learned1:58:25How the Eight-Eight Fleet balanced capital-ship typesNotable Point
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...54:46What would Yamato look like in an 18-inch treaty world?Q&A
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:01:39How larger guns on Hood could reshape the Washington TreatyQ&A
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:04:42How America might answer a 16.5-inch HoodQ&A
- Bruships 193: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:19:43Why a secret Kii-class battleship would collapse treaty restraintQ&A
- Bruships 193: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:51:42Who would control a privately completed Tosa?Q&A
- Bruships 193: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:01:41An American 18-inch gun program before the treaty eraQ&A
- How Pursuing Peace(with bonus cost cutting) can lead to War: 1930s London Naval Treaty Leadership19:49Who won the naval treaties changes with hindsightNotable Point
- How Pursuing Peace(with bonus cost cutting) can lead to War: 1930s London Naval Treaty Leadership23:47Japan's 7:10 ratio as a deterrent strategyChapter
- How Pursuing Peace(with bonus cost cutting) can lead to War: 1930s London Naval Treaty Leadership26:08Japan's coerced opening shapes treaty insecurityNotable Point
- How Pursuing Peace(with bonus cost cutting) can lead to War: 1930s London Naval Treaty Leadership33:39French government instability weakens treaty diplomacyChapter
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:26:14Why a giant Italian battlecruiser changes the treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:01:09Trading Courageous and Glorious for a third RenownQ&A
- Bruships 191: Naval History Questions Answered Live...31:53How naval treaties arrived at 8-inch and 16-inch gun limitsQ&A
- Bruships 191: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:45:39Beatty, Jellicoe, and the limits of a simple rivalryNotable Point
- Leadership of the 1930 London Naval Treaty1:27:14Distinguishing Washington from the later London restrictionsNotable Point
- Italian Submarines of WWII: Shackled Potential or Victims of Geography?51:14The First London Treaty constrained useful light forcesNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!50:44How navies learned to preserve mothball fleetsQ&A
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!1:10:38Canadian Queen Elizabeths and the case for F3Q&A
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!1:16:47Choosing warship propulsion without the Washington TreatyQ&A
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!3:22:07Manning an Incomparable-sized carrier in the 1920sQ&A
- Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...35:47F3 and the timing of the Washington Naval TreatyNotable Point
- So you want to Build a Battleship today? For the 21st Century? Naval History Live2:34:30An expensive deterrent remains useful if deterrence failsNotable Point
- Bruships 187: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:22:11Why the US Navy did not buy more eight-inch armored cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:43:24Why the Courageous conversions were a tolerable treaty outcomeQ&A
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:14:36Why a 15,500-ton treaty cruiser limit was unlikelyQ&A
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:18:26How Japan might treat a 15,500-ton cruiser limitQ&A
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:56:32Competing starting points for a naval-treaty counterfactualQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:29:44G3 hulls as Washington Treaty aircraft carriersQ&A
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?32:59Why postwar governments had reasons to limit naval spendingNotable Point
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?39:01Why a Washington-style treaty cannot work in 1909Chapter
- The British Admiralty 1628-1964: Some Examples of First Sea Lords and How they worked1:51:37Charles Madden and the First London Naval TreatyChapter
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:47:48Large Admiral conversions could preserve a naval Fleet Air ArmQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:19:53Three Admiral-class carrier conversions reshape the treaty fleetsQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:10:54How the Royal Navy preferred to bend treaty rulesQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:12:45A 10-inch cruiser limit reshapes every treaty categoryQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:20:17Des Moines as an example of a 15,000-ton cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:21:27Larger treaty cruisers could alter carrier allowancesNotable Point
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:37:12Hōshō as a British escort-carrier experiment in the 1920sQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:25:18What interwar conversions taught about carrier sizeQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:05:06Admiral carrier conversions and a different Washington settlementNotable Point
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:08:06Converting the Admirals or the Courageous classQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:38:55Faster 16-inch US Standard battleshipsQ&A
- Tōgō Heihachirō: Victor of Tsushima & Japan's Nelson...1:31:32Tōgō as elder statesman and cruiser advocateChapter
- Bruships 179: Future Projects & Naval History Questions...19:29If Gallipoli had opened the DardanellesQ&A
- Bruships 179: Future Projects & Naval History Questions...3:05:30Why US destroyer escorts were not initially called frigatesQ&A
- Bruships 178: Naval History or Exercise2:58:53A 10:10:7 Washington Treaty fleet ratioQ&A
- Bruships 177: New Year, same Dr Alex... possibly with new gym membership1:54:52Doubling Washington Treaty carrier tonnageQ&A
- What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?6:40The Washington treaty permitted two British capital ships without requiring 16-inch gunsChapter
- What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?10:54An improved 15-inch gun might fit the treaty's reconstruction wordingNotable Point
- Prof Capt Armstrong & Dr C Discuss the value of Mahan, Corbett & Sims today? #2Historians Ep 61:17:24Fleet Problem IX revealed both carrier power and vulnerabilityQ&A
- Prof Capt Armstrong & Dr C Discuss the value of Mahan, Corbett & Sims today? #2Historians Ep 61:28:32British carrier armour and the distance to repair yardsNotable Point
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?24:41Italian carriers reshape the Mediterranean naval warQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?2:08:22A larger Hawkins class rewrites treaty categoriesQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?2:32:55Converting R-class battleships into Renowns was the wrong treaty bargainQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?2:47:24A fourth barbette lengthens the King George V citadelQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?3:04:14Renown and Repulse were razeed on the stocks, not in serviceQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?3:38:21Cherry trees refers to Japanese ships cut down by WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?4:08:49An early Baltic victory rewrites the post-World War I orderQ&A
- Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...6:04The Washington treaty sets the British design boxChapter
- Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...17:47Postwar threat assessment rewards mobile capital shipsNotable Point
- Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...2:07:32Naval treaties tolerated a bounded margin of misstatementNotable Point
- Prof Mercogliano & Dr C Discuss What is going on with Logistics(Shipping)? #2Historians Ep 537:18America's World War I shipbuilding surge and postwar retreatChapter
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?44:29A delayed Washington treaty would not revive an Admiral-class carrierQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?1:00:58How Tillman-sized carriers could reshape WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?1:15:48An 18-inch Hood could break the historical treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?1:48:18Why G3 carrier conversions would be conversions in name onlyQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?2:47:05A separate battlecruiser category at WashingtonQ&A
- The Monroe Doctrine: The Myth, The Legend, The Rhetoric, The Reality!22:30Freedom of the seas and the limits of Pax BritannicaNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Spirit Ship: HMS Tiger(1913) - Key Ships Series 9, Ship 927:15Treaty displacement and Tiger's interwar valueNotable Point
- Bruships 172: So the Historiophon Happened...3:43:59Canadian Queen Elizabeths would reshape two wars and the treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships 172: So the Historiophon Happened...3:55:10Canadian Tigers could create a treaty battlecruiser categoryQ&A
- Bruships 172: So the Historiophon Happened...4:05:41Treaty carrier conversions were compromises, not ideal carriersQ&A
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/42:58:17Essay: Dominion large cruisers at the Washington ConferenceChapter
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/43:44:28Four Queen Elizabeths for each Dominion and the treaty balanceQ&A
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/45:36:46Treaty survival for an early US battlecruiserQ&A
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/453:35Versailles targeted Germany's naval industrial memoryQ&A
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/41:33:31Essay scenario: five Rodney-class fast battleshipsChapter
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/41:43:04Essay scenario: an equitable treaty and rolling constructionChapter
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/42:02:31When treaty battleship ratios outrun national economiesQ&A
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/42:08:07Why a 16-inch-gun landing ship would breach treaty logicQ&A
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/47:04:18Eight Dutch dreadnoughts would reshape treaties and Far Eastern defenseQ&A
- World of Warships Colab 1, Questions & U Class subs: Second 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 2/45:11:10How Brazil could reshape Washington Treaty bargainingQ&A
- World of Warships Colab 1, Questions & U Class subs: Second 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 2/45:15:52Japan's ratio in an enlarged treaty counterfactualQ&A
- World of Warships Colab 1, Questions & U Class subs: Second 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 2/47:22:13How Tiger Cub cruisers could reshape the Washington systemQ&A
- World of Warships Colab 1, Questions & U Class subs: Second 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 2/47:42:27What tonnage limits would a Tiger Cub treaty use?Q&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/419:47Why the Royal Navy risked carriers in submarine hunting groupsQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/44:48:34Why an early naval-treaty collapse would not hand the Axis parityQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/45:29:31What Japan's Eight-Eight fleet plan actually soughtQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/47:13:35Four Admiral-class carriers would rewrite treaty negotiationsQ&A
- Kido Butai spotted on december 4th 1941... 3 days before Pearl Harbour, what changes? Patreon 1082:35:04More prewar cruisers improve American scoutingQ&A
- Kido Butai spotted on december 4th 1941... 3 days before Pearl Harbour, what changes? Patreon 1082:41:00Which American cruiser classes would multiply?Q&A
- Kido Butai spotted on december 4th 1941... 3 days before Pearl Harbour, what changes? Patreon 1082:53:04A world without naval treaties favors a technology raceQ&A
- Ramblings Emergency Broadcast10:05Did naval treaties delay warship technology?Q&A
- Ramblings Emergency Broadcast1:45:19Why a naval-treaty roleplay needs historical incentivesQ&A
- Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax3:18:40More Jutland losses could produce true fast battleshipsQ&A
- A path to negotiation for Japan in August 1941?19:30The diplomatic trap of demanding concessions before talksChapter
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 17:10What should the interwar Royal Navy carrier have been?Q&A
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 121:51A layered interwar carrier fleetChapter
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 134:37Three Admiral-class carriers before the Washington treatyNotable Point
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 145:18Survivable fleet carriers and smaller ASW escortsNotable Point
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!2:10:34A 45,000-ton Washington treaty reshapes battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!3:08:40Why Japan wanted a seventy-percent treaty ratioQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!3:43:02If the Nevadas became 28-knot battlecruisersQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!3:46:20Fast American Nevadas could create a separate battlecruiser treaty quotaNotable Point
- Frigating Tiger Cubs: WWI if the Royal Navy builds some 9.2in armed 'Dreadnought Cruisers'2:00:31Tiger Cubs rewrite postwar cruiser and treaty categoriesChapter
- Frigating Tiger Cubs: WWI if the Royal Navy builds some 9.2in armed 'Dreadnought Cruisers'2:01:30An early peace could erase the Washington Naval TreatyNotable Point
- Frigating Tiger Cubs: WWI if the Royal Navy builds some 9.2in armed 'Dreadnought Cruisers'2:04:17A 20,000-ton cruiser changes every treaty categoryNotable Point
- Frigating Tiger Cubs: WWI if the Royal Navy builds some 9.2in armed 'Dreadnought Cruisers'2:06:45Existing cruisers and carrier duties shape fleet quotasNotable Point
- The Lessons of Never Built Carriers18:48How unbuilt carrier programs could reshape rival planningNotable Point
- The Lessons of Never Built Carriers43:45French carriers and strategic independenceNotable Point
- Bruships 169: Kalax o Kalax, my kingdom for a Kalax...2:24:04Adding Spain and Brazil destabilizes Washington treaty arithmeticQ&A
- Bruships 169: Kalax o Kalax, my kingdom for a Kalax...2:45:02Treaty-power Spain changes both world-war coalition calculationsQ&A
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...1:56:13A new treaty category for station cruisersChapter
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:00:28Britain's grandfathered cruiser advantageNotable Point
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:06:00Treaty tonnage produces faster capital shipsNotable Point
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:17:09Higher treaty tonnage reshapes carriers and capital shipsChapter
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song1:09:29Why a 16-inch Kongō rebuild would be a radical compromiseQ&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song1:28:30Libyan oil and an Italian cruiser-heavy naval programmeQ&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song2:43:03A 20-inch Tillman II would destroy the treaty pauseQ&A
- Bruships 167: Tell me why, everything turned book – packing up, stacking up is all kalax want to do.57:31A 10:10:7:4:4 Washington treaty ratioQ&A
- Bruships 167: Tell me why, everything turned book – packing up, stacking up is all kalax want to do.1:49:32Fast Nagatos and the Washington TreatyQ&A
- V.Adm Beatty is sent to Command the Mediterranean Battle Cruisers in 1914... Patreon 1052:17:25Would a successful Dardanelles forcing change treaty policy?Q&A
- V.Adm Beatty is sent to Command the Mediterranean Battle Cruisers in 1914... Patreon 1052:23:48Could treaty navies build new carriers from the keel up?Q&A
- For History: Which Three ships should never have been scrapped?50:52HMS Rodney as a Washington Treaty battleshipNotable Point
- For History: Which Three ships should never have been scrapped?1:06:30Why the Panama Canal changes US fleet strategyNotable Point
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!2:03:16If the German fleet were not scuttled at Scapa FlowQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!3:34:38The case for completing more C-, D-, and E-class cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat26:35Tiger-derived cruisers as a bridge for British shipyardsQ&A
- Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat38:33Why Washington fails without JapanQ&A
- Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat1:26:09A twelve-gun Hood reshapes bases and the Washington talksQ&A
- Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat1:33:19A negotiated 1918 peace leaves no workable Washington treatyQ&A
- Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat2:07:07Why a foreign-yard clause would sink the Washington treatyQ&A
- Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat2:39:24Britain's response to fifteen French capital shipsQ&A
- Empire Prepares: What if the British Empire invested more in the 1920s & 30s7:30Three ways Britain could work within the naval treatiesChapter
- Empire Prepares: What if the British Empire invested more in the 1920s & 30s13:33Cruisers and sloops as an imperial economic programmeChapter
- Empire Prepares: What if the British Empire invested more in the 1920s & 30s14:07How more County-class cruisers could change treaty bargainingNotable Point
- Empire Prepares: What if the British Empire invested more in the 1920s & 30s44:12Cruiser carriers built from County-class hullsChapter
- Empire Prepares: What if the British Empire invested more in the 1920s & 30s54:58Cruiser-carrier squadrons and the next treatyNotable Point
- Empire Prepares: What if the British Empire invested more in the 1920s & 30s1:27:00Building cruisers and small carriers before the London treatyNotable Point
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat41:18Could the Royal Navy have launched K3 battlecruisers before Washington?Q&A
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat2:17:50Higher treaty limits would not resolve the naval balance problemQ&A
- Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!47:48A delayed Washington treaty could leave G3s afloatQ&A
- Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!1:34:18Why Italy abandoned the compliant Trento proposalQ&A
- Bruships 159: New Office - This may be quick, discord may work & I may not have a Pneumonia attack!43:12Extra American battlecruisers would pressure the Washington treaty limitsQ&A
- HMAS Melbourne and HMCS Bonaventure19:00A Hermes-style carrier counterfactual for the DominionsNotable Point
- Check Campaign 27: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:42:46Could a harsher naval treaty have broken the challengers?Chapter
- Sōryū/Hiryū Class… Breaking into the future? Key Ships Series 9, Ships 526:35Treaty weight and Fourth Fleet lessonsChapter
- Sōryū/Hiryū Class… Breaking into the future? Key Ships Series 9, Ships 537:32Treaty limits, paper ships, and design workaroundsNotable Point
- Check Campaign 23: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:45:3718-inch guns and a Washington Treaty counterfactualChapter
- Bruships 157: Books so good they've blown the budget on the #ScandiShip24 tour already!1:13:08A 9.2-inch cruiser line changes the Goeben pursuitQ&A
- Bruships 157: Books so good they've blown the budget on the #ScandiShip24 tour already!2:00:31Treaty arithmetic made small carriers inefficientQ&A
- Bruships 157: Books so good they've blown the budget on the #ScandiShip24 tour already!2:03:01Why eight Hermes-class carriers change treaty arithmeticQ&A
- Fisher's Furious Flying off Ships: Courageous Class built as Aircraft Carriers1:07:10A mature carrier fleet breaks Washington treaty arithmeticChapter
- Fisher's Furious Flying off Ships: Courageous Class built as Aircraft Carriers1:15:31Treaties may invent three carrier categories earlyNotable Point
- Fisher's Furious Flying off Ships: Courageous Class built as Aircraft Carriers1:19:23Carrier categories spill into battlecruiser limitsNotable Point
- Fisher's Furious Flying off Ships: Courageous Class built as Aircraft Carriers1:24:28A 35,000-ton carrier ceiling drives bigger battleshipsNotable Point
- Bruships Gothenborg style...1:18:13Without the Scapa Flow scuttle, naval arms control becomes harderQ&A
- Bruships Gothenborg style...1:21:07Battleship-scale carrier allowances would favour the Royal NavyQ&A
- Bruships Gothenborg style...1:22:49Four Admiral-class battlecruisers would raise treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?57:54Admiral-class carriers and the Washington treatyQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?2:38:22Building improved R-class ships after JutlandQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?3:18:17Canadian Tigers at the Washington conferenceQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?4:04:01American 16- and 18-inch guns before WashingtonQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 2: H Class Battleships, Japanese Carrier Aircraft Design and lots more1:25:31Five fast Nelson-style ships in the Tillman treaty scenarioQ&A
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!3:36:04Australia outside British Washington Treaty tonnageQ&A
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote3:45:56Exploiting a treaty that excludes combat loadQ&A
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion7:31Washington Treaty definitions and national carrier allowancesChapter
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion11:52Battlecarriers had to justify combining two fleet rolesNotable Point
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion1:23:32Larger carrier allowances could reduce design compromisesNotable Point
- Check Campaign 16: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:28:48Large Soviet destroyers and naval-treaty boundariesNotable Point
- The Drivers of the Evolution of Carrier Air Groups...1:06:29Lexington complicates treaty-era carrier labelsNotable Point
- The Drivers of the Evolution of Carrier Air Groups...1:27:37Carrier conversion planning was already technically matureNotable Point
- Striking First: The Development of US Carrier Naval Aviation Doctrine by War Gaming & Fleet Problems1:04:23Treaty limits collide with large-carrier doctrineNotable Point
- Striking First: The Development of US Carrier Naval Aviation Doctrine by War Gaming & Fleet Problems1:11:20Ranger compresses a large air group into a treaty hullChapter
- Check Campaign 15: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:21:17French global commitments versus Italian concentrationQ&A
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends33:29An eighteen-inch-gun naval treaty worldQ&A
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends1:55:03Why treaties chose a naval holidayQ&A
- Taranto Zero: Japan joins WWII on side of Britain in June 1940 - Patreon Alternate History21:06Japan seeks time and resources through its old allianceNotable Point
- USS Triton (SSRN-586): First Submerged Cirumnavigation of the World14:24British 18-inch battleships would change Washington's bargainingNotable Point
- What the post WWI Navys really wanted from Aircraft Carriers: Hermes, Hōshō & Langley!15:10Langley gives the US Navy a small carrier laboratoryChapter
- What the post WWI Navys really wanted from Aircraft Carriers: Hermes, Hōshō & Langley!1:12:14A maritime police role requires both battle and patrol fleetsNotable Point
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign8:09How more carriers change Britain's 1939 choicesQ&A
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign12:10How a Tillman treaty fleet tightens blockade pressureQ&A
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:13:43Tillman designs and a qualitative arms raceQ&A
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:55:17British 16.5-inch guns and the Washington treatyQ&A
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:03:17Hawkins and cruiser treaty categoriesQ&A
- Bruships 148: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Begins2:14:27Capital ships and tonnage for a three-fleet Royal NavyQ&A
- Bruships 148: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Begins2:27:21Treaty tonnage for a Royal Navy three-fleet systemQ&A
- Admiral Fisher no longer replaces Admiral Battenberg as First Sea Lord in November 1914...1:16:58Russia and the end of the Anglo-Japanese AllianceNotable Point
- Admiral Fisher no longer replaces Admiral Battenberg as First Sea Lord in November 1914...2:09:28The postwar legacy of an 18-inch-gun fleetChapter
- French Naval Aviation: A Quick Historical Overview & Introduction to it's Squadrons9:30Béarn, treaty constraints, and a missed carrier forceChapter
- French Naval Aviation: A Quick Historical Overview & Introduction to it's Squadrons52:16What two Béarns might have changed before the Second World WarNotable Point
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed3:00:38Nine fast Queen Elizabeths and the Washington treatyQ&A
- Patreon 101: If Lord Fisher died in Jan 1914, how does Prince Louis of Battenberg perform as 1SL?2:50:25How 18-inch fast battleships would reshape naval treatiesNotable Point
- Check Campaign 12: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:32:07Could prewar spending have deterred Germany?Notable Point
- USS Akron; The World's First Purpose Built Flying Aircraft Carrier9:43Would converting Renown and Repulse have changed British carrier doctrine?Q&A
- USS Akron; The World's First Purpose Built Flying Aircraft Carrier16:47Would an airship carrier count under the treaties?Q&A
- The Furious Age: The First Aircraft Carriers1:05:26USS Langley's namesake tied aviation to railway timekeepingNotable Point
- Check Campaign 11: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:11:36Treaty compliance and naval creative accountingNotable Point
- Bruships 144: Some Books(Can't Find Lego Cam Sorry) & Naval History Questions3:24:21Why equal treaty limits push battleships toward convergenceQ&A
- The Royal Navy's Forgotten Lost Battleship Generation: Key Ship Series 8 - Ships 644:49Small battleship studies as a political exerciseNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Forgotten Lost Battleship Generation: Key Ship Series 8 - Ships 61:00:14Treaty collapse may still produce one restrained generationNotable Point
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered3:54:22The treaty allowance could favor Renown-class carrier conversionsQ&A
- Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London57:27France's Mediterranean and imperial commitments limit its bargaining freedomNotable Point
- Check Campaign 9: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign54:19A treaty-survival scenario links ship design to interwar policyNotable Point
- Giulio Cesare: The Lucky Ceasar of the Regia Marina, Key Ships Series 8 – Ship 51:05:25The Conte di Cavours and Italian treaty equality with FranceChapter
- Giulio Cesare: The Lucky Ceasar of the Regia Marina, Key Ships Series 8 – Ship 51:09:41How Italy assembled its Washington treaty tonnage claimNotable Point
- The Age of the Seaplane Carrier: Why WWI was the true first Naval Aviation War1:04:16What successful air reporting at Jutland might have changedQ&A
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books15:26Why Yubari's test-bed design stayed conservativeQ&A
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books1:55:14A treaty loophole for improved Hermes-type carriersQ&A
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books2:00:03Why the Washington Treaty cut the Sendai program shortQ&A
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books2:12:50Why a more generous Washington treaty hurts GermanyQ&A
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books2:18:20Ten fast battleships under a larger treaty allowanceNotable Point
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books2:20:53How more carriers could change Royal Navy task forcesNotable Point
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books2:23:02What a 14,000-ton County cruiser could carryNotable Point
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books2:33:07Why expanded treaty fleets push Italy toward carriersQ&A
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books4:11:23What British neutrality would do to naval developmentQ&A
- HMS Revenge(1915): the Reliable Pikeman of the Royal Navys Battle Line!32:20Gun caliber, barrel pools, and fleet logisticsNotable Point
- HMS Revenge(1915): the Reliable Pikeman of the Royal Navys Battle Line!57:16Treaty fleets, rotations, and selective modernizationChapter
- Navys in the Embassy Bar after the Washington Treaty(1922)1:02Personifying navies to explain treaty negotiationsChapter
- Navys in the Embassy Bar after the Washington Treaty(1922)4:53Five treaty navies meet after WashingtonChapter
- Navys in the Embassy Bar after the Washington Treaty(1922)6:08The Royal Navy sees a floor against Treasury cutsNotable Point
- Navys in the Embassy Bar after the Washington Treaty(1922)6:41Paper parity becomes Congress's maximumNotable Point
- Navys in the Embassy Bar after the Washington Treaty(1922)7:31Japan's treaty ratio meets army rivalryNotable Point
- Navys in the Embassy Bar after the Washington Treaty(1922)8:32Italy loses the Francesco Caracciolo promiseNotable Point
- Navys in the Embassy Bar after the Washington Treaty(1922)10:00French parity frustration and the Béarn conversionNotable Point
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered6:41How Battenberg's battleships could reshape WashingtonNotable Point
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered50:51Why interwar naval rockets needed more than propulsionQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered1:59:17How 9.2-inch Courageous-class cruisers reshape WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered2:41:56Why the Royal Navy did not build large cruisers in wartimeQ&A
- Imperial Russia Survives WWI: A Patreon Requested Alternate History11:33Why ending the war too early changes the naval worldNotable Point
- Imperial Russia Survives WWI: A Patreon Requested Alternate History15:39A decisive Jutland validates the big-gun raceNotable Point
- Imperial Russia Survives WWI: A Patreon Requested Alternate History44:55Russia breaks the Washington treaty tonnage ratiosChapter
- Imperial Russia Survives WWI: A Patreon Requested Alternate History47:11G3 construction raises the treaty ceilingChapter
- Imperial Russia Survives WWI: A Patreon Requested Alternate History49:57Ship-by-ship limits replace fleet ratiosChapter
- Imperial Russia Survives WWI: A Patreon Requested Alternate History53:22Russian rebuilding delays the naval treatyChapter
- The Last Invasion of Britain: Battle of Fishguard(1797)2:51:36How to build a naval alternate-history questionQ&A
- The Last Invasion of Britain: Battle of Fishguard(1797)2:52:36A completed Tillman III reshapes the battleship raceNotable Point
- Check Campaign 8: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign48:18The campaign fleet ignores Washington treaty limitsNotable Point
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!1:24:12How a scout-carrier category could reshape treaty fleetsQ&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!3:07:07Tillman's racism could distort the Japanese treaty ratio in opposite directionsQ&A
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty54:04Rewriting the capital-ship limitsChapter
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty58:18A treaty ceiling redirects British gun developmentNotable Point
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty1:05:45Japan and Italy gain room to buildChapter
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty1:09:41Four Lexington conversions need more escortsChapter
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty1:32:09Could stronger treaty fleets improve diplomacy?Notable Point
- Glen Class: An Insight into Landing Ship Infantry - Key Ships Series 8, Ship 324:20Were the Glen ships designed with wartime conversion in mind?Notable Point
- Glen Class: An Insight into Landing Ship Infantry - Key Ships Series 8, Ship 325:22Why Japan framed British prewar amphibious planningNotable Point
- Patreon 98: The World Spins on a Coin: The February Revolution Fails & Imperial Russia survives WWI1:15:03Adding Russia breaks the Washington treaty hierarchyChapter
- Patreon 98: The World Spins on a Coin: The February Revolution Fails & Imperial Russia survives WWI1:21:39Could Russia replace Japan in a naval treaty?Q&A
- Patreon 98: The World Spins on a Coin: The February Revolution Fails & Imperial Russia survives WWI1:28:04A treaty based on ship size rather than fleet totalsQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered1:41:46How a British two-inch gun progression reshapes WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered3:05:41How a 9.2-inch Hawkins changes cruiser treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered3:37:07Why the G3 and N3 programs were credibleQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered4:13:05Why cruiser treaty limits started with HawkinsQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered4:20:53Carrier parity under a different Washington treatyQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered4:28:27Larger treaty allowances and national building constraintsQ&A
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...28:05HMS Hood pushes the ceiling above 35,000 tonsChapter
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...34:24Hood's accepted treaty displacement sets the benchmarkQ&A
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...35:45Tillman must survive long enough to embed the bargainChapter
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...1:22:59The Hawkins class exposes America's cruiser gapChapter
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...1:25:49Three South Dakotas reshape the American settlementChapter
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...1:30:14Japan trades older hulls for Tosa or AmagiChapter
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...1:38:22Why Britain cannot evade limits through Dominion transfersQ&A
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...2:02:46Navies would spend carrier tonnage graduallyQ&A
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...2:29:17Italy gains several Caracciolo-class battleshipsChapter
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...2:50:27Alternate history works best near the point of divergenceNotable Point
- Check Campaign 6: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:47:26Roosevelt, Tillman, and a different naval treatyQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!2:22:58How Sturdee might redirect post-Jutland naval policyQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!3:06:21Why G3 and N3 were not the Royal Navy's whole building planQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!3:17:49Why Britain would fund naval expansion without treaty securityNotable Point
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!3:57:28How naval construction could soften an economic downturnNotable Point
- MAC Ships: Success having many Parents or simply Logical Conclusions? - Key Ship Series 8 Ship 20:00Why the MAC ship had many plausible inventorsChapter
- MAC Ships: Success having many Parents or simply Logical Conclusions? - Key Ship Series 8 Ship 212:10Treaty limits squeezed out the cruiser-carrier roleChapter
- Racking up the Fight Back: American Carrier raids of 194241:49Why Pacific airfields still required defensible garrisonsQ&A
- Racking up the Fight Back: American Carrier raids of 194244:27A Pacific without the treaty fortification clauseQ&A
- Racking up the Fight Back: American Carrier raids of 194245:43Who gained most from the Washington Naval Treaty?Notable Point
- British Naval Aviation Doctrine during the 1920s & 30s: it's Context & Development17:38Argus turns limited carrier strength into a laboratoryChapter
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered2:12:44An unscuttled High Seas Fleet complicates the treaty systemQ&A
- Douglas TBD Devastator: Not So Bad as History Says - Key Aircraft Series 1, Aircraft 652:18Midway's torpedo squadrons attacked without their planned escortChapter
- Patreon 96: Odd ship designs that actually work.1:19:19A treaty-legal cruiser submarine still had to justify its costNotable Point
- The HMS Ark Royals Saga: A History of Naval Aviation in a Name...21:12The treaty-era Ark Royal as a strike carrierChapter
- The HMS Ark Royals Saga: A History of Naval Aviation in a Name...32:42Treaty limits constrained Ark Royal's ideal designNotable Point
- The HMS Ark Royals Saga: A History of Naval Aviation in a Name...50:02Carrier procurement shaped by changing politicsChapter
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered1:14:58Trading triple turrets for larger twin-gun mountingsQ&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered1:35:31A 45,000-ton Washington capital-ship limitQ&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered1:45:00How Hawkins shaped treaty cruiser limitsQ&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered3:23:00The cruiser race hidden inside the Washington treatyQ&A
- What changes if Helicopters are at their third generation in 1939?18:43Naval treaties redirect competition toward helicoptersChapter
- What changes if Helicopters are at their third generation in 1939?19:33Arms control can redirect military competitionNotable Point
- HMS Unicorn: Honestly Not An Aircraft Carrier - Key Ship Series 8, Ship 10:00Naval treaties created opportunities as well as constraintsChapter
- Naval History Writing Competition 2023/20243:01Writing an alternate history around a Washington Treaty cancellationChapter
- Naval History Writing Competition 2023/20244:27If the Great Kanto earthquake had not doomed AmagiNotable Point
- Naval History Writing Competition 2023/202411:51Choosing the F3 design instead of Nelson and RodneyNotable Point
- Naval History Writing Competition 2023/202414:44Why a treaty-era capital ship could not remain secretNotable Point
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time20:32A delayed Washington treaty opens the way to 9.2-inch cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time40:21A flat naval budget can cut a fleet without an explicit voteQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time45:07More Queen Elizabeths and Admirals harden Britain's treaty positionQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time55:35Treaty carrier conversions depended on how much hull already existedQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time1:21:44British 9.2-inch cruisers force Germany beyond the pocket battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time2:04:10Spain's exclusion from Washington exposed its naval irrelevanceQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time3:47:40Without Washington, the naval race settles into recurring small batchesQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time3:56:24Japanese light cruisers evolved from scouts into destroyer leadersChapter
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time4:03:19A 12,000-ton cruiser limit reshapes guns and carrier loopholesQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time4:32:49Competition asks how an unbuilt treaty-era warship reaches World War IIChapter
- What kind of Carrier do you need or want?46:48The treaty threshold that caught HMS HermesNotable Point
- What kind of Carrier do you need or want?49:31Treaties shaped the first carrier fleetsChapter
- What kind of Carrier do you need or want?1:20:08Treaty limits and actual fleet strength divergedNotable Point
- Patreon 94: The different types of Aircraft Carriers/Seaplane Carriers/Hybrids48:47New construction would push older conversions into reserveNotable Point
- Patreon 94: The different types of Aircraft Carriers/Seaplane Carriers/Hybrids1:09:49Battlecruiser conversions concentrate treaty tonnageChapter
- Patreon 94: The different types of Aircraft Carriers/Seaplane Carriers/Hybrids1:15:14Treaties divert national carrier design pathsNotable Point
- Patreon 94: The different types of Aircraft Carriers/Seaplane Carriers/Hybrids1:22:21Treaties make conversions the dominant carrier generationNotable Point
- Patreon 94: The different types of Aircraft Carriers/Seaplane Carriers/Hybrids1:23:41What would more Hermes-sized carriers change?Q&A
- Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō12:16The treaty loophole behind small carriersChapter
- Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō16:31Why 10,000 tons also became the cruiser ceilingNotable Point
- Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō36:37Ryūjō's treaty-driven design and stability problemsChapter
- Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō51:04A 1924 flight-deck-cruiser counterfactualNotable Point
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books5:57How faster N3 and G3 designs change treaty bargainingQ&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books19:23If every treaty navy received two new battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books27:01A British 28,000-ton carrier before treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books58:35How a heavier British battle line changes treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books1:01:47How Hawkins shaped the treaty cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books1:12:21Would larger Courageous-class ships become carriers?Q&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books2:20:34The Washington treaty allowed new carriers as well as conversionsQ&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books2:34:09Why pre-treaty experimental carriers gave Britain flexibilityQ&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books2:42:31Why eight-inch guns were a poor carrier tradeQ&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books3:04:12Who benefits from a 15,000-ton, 9.2-inch cruiser limitQ&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books3:12:02Why Australia would buy County-class cruisersQ&A
- Old Crocks at War: The Value of Reserve Ships to Navys in WWI1:15:28Italian naval professionalism beyond the stereotypeNotable Point
- Patreon 93: Old crocks at war. How useful to WWI were the old ships brought out of reserve?2:21:48Naval treaties remove construction continuity and reserve depthChapter
- Patreon 93: Old crocks at war. How useful to WWI were the old ships brought out of reserve?2:26:56A treaty reserve could rotate old capital ships into new constructionNotable Point
- Patreon 93: Old crocks at war. How useful to WWI were the old ships brought out of reserve?2:33:38Reserve modernization sustains yards and carrier depthNotable Point
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:14:04Whether the G3 battlecruisers were laid downQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:30:30Could Britain have built the G3 battlecruisers?Q&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:07:26A treaty without the capital-ship holidayQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:19:54Why a twelve-gun treaty cruiser breaks the design boxQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:37:59Britain's argument against the building holidayQ&A
- Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!27:59A no-treaty Japanese battlefleet would keep expandingQ&A
- Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:40:40Completing treaty-canceled capital ships would delay US and Japanese naval aviationQ&A
- Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:03:18How G3 and N3 ideas might merge without WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:34:12A 9.2-inch treaty limit would pull rival cruisers toward the British calibreQ&A
- Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:41:23Forty County-class cruisers would inflate the whole treaty tonnage ladderQ&A
- HMS Enterprise: Tell Me Where You Need Your Royals or Gold Delivered - Key Ships Series 7 Ship 552:37Enterprise bridged two generations of British cruiser designChapter
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...23:17A generous carrier-conversion rule would favor the United StatesQ&A
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...30:54Hermes, not Eagle, was Britain's purpose-built carrierQ&A
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...1:37:27A 17,000-ton cruiser crosses the Washington Treaty's capital-ship lineQ&A
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...1:38:40Some old cruisers could be grandfathered into the treaty fleetQ&A
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...1:41:23French capital-ship choices could weaken British Mediterranean strategyQ&A
- Tillman Class: Dreams of Super Battleships - KSS2 S8 Comment Response10:54Tillman's shipyard politics challenge a building holidayQ&A
- Tillman Class: Dreams of Super Battleships - KSS2 S8 Comment Response29:06Japan's stronger hand in a Versailles naval settlementQ&A
- Tillman Class: Dreams of Super Battleships - KSS2 S8 Comment Response42:08Why the Tillman designs were politically plausibleChapter
- Francesco Caracciolo: The Almost Next Battleship Era - KSS2 S6 Comment Response1:34Four Caracciolos could reshape the treaty-era building raceNotable Point
- The Amagi Class: Super Kongos or Nascent Fast Battleships? - KSS2 S5 Comment Response9:44Fleet-carrier development without treaty conversionsQ&A
- The Amagi Class: Super Kongos or Nascent Fast Battleships? - KSS2 S5 Comment Response15:32Possible successors to the 1920 South Dakota classQ&A
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out28:22Shrinking L3 and K3 ideas into a treaty battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out46:049.2-inch Courageous-class cruisers reshape treaty fleetsQ&A
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out1:32:11A separate 9.2-inch category leaves Britain choosing its smaller cruiser gunsNotable Point
- Lexington Class: America's Battle Cruiser Dreams - KSS2 S4 Comment Response20:39How the name frigate might have changed battlecruiser treaty treatmentNotable Point
- Lexington Class: America's Battle Cruiser Dreams - KSS2 S4 Comment Response29:51What a no-treaty battlecruiser generation might have becomeQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response21:21Two K3s would reshape the Washington treatyQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response31:39Washington and London cruiser limits differedQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response48:04G3s could set a 16.5-inch treaty limitNotable Point
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response1:04:04Two K3s undermine American treaty assumptionsQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response1:08:42Larger treaty ships widen Germany's industrial gapNotable Point
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response1:14:52K3 carrier conversions and naval aviationNotable Point
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response1:16:50F3 battlecruisers as a treaty alternativeQ&A
- Graf Zeppelin: KSS2 S1 Comment Response20:31How British practice shaped naval treaty rulesQ&A
- Operation Berlin: Tour De Force or Tour De Farce?1:25:00Rodney nearly caught GneisenauChapter
- Operation Berlin (Atlantic) – a Failure of Both Sides?2:58:30F2 and F3 designs show why interception speed matteredNotable Point
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy47:21Did aircraft make the Lexington battlecruiser role redundant?Q&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy1:15:17Did the Royal Navy step back from decisive-battle thinking?Q&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy1:48:24Admiral carrier conversions and an early G3Chapter
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy2:58:10Would a Kongo make a better carrier conversion than Kaga?Q&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships15:04Capital ships without the Washington Naval TreatyQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships30:52A global Royal Navy carrier force without treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships44:17How British construction would strengthen the US treaty offerQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships1:04:38Why carrier conversions decline without treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships1:14:43Britain's leverage at the Washington negotiationsQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships1:31:01Why US treaty concern centered on ship sizeQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships2:19:42How far the United States might concede at WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 129: Travels, Rememberance & Questions from Chat26:54Japan's finances without the Washington treatyQ&A
- Bruships 129: Travels, Rememberance & Questions from Chat56:52Why an 8:5:3 treaty ratio shifts insecurityQ&A
- Bruships 129: Travels, Rememberance & Questions from Chat59:44Why US planners wanted a two-ocean naval marginNotable Point
- The Sydney Strategy: What if the British Empire Far East Base was Sydney not Singapore49:01A Sydney strategy redesigns the Royal Navy around rangeChapter
- Asahi(1899): Cornerstone of the Six/Six Pland - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 846:20From battleship to forward repair shipChapter
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare1:16:51Why using war debt against the G3 and N3 programs could backfireQ&A
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare1:20:40How debt coercion could delay the naval treatiesNotable Point
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare1:45:57Why a Coast Guard label cannot hide a capital shipQ&A
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare3:16:59Bringing Lexington under treaty tonnage during constructionQ&A
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 76:24Italian cruisers exposed a French force-structure trapChapter
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases51:49A Royal Navy jump to 16-inch guns reshapes treaty arithmeticQ&A
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases1:21:44A 9.2-inch Hawkins class raises the treaty cruiser ceilingQ&A
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases3:37:04Completion percentages hid the Lexingtons' treaty advantageQ&A
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases3:43:11Treaties need security as well as limitsNotable Point
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases3:56:37One treaty delegation could strengthen Commonwealth naval unityQ&A
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty0:01Why make battlecruisers a separate treaty category?Chapter
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty6:36Anglo-American competition without an expected warNotable Point
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty10:01Treaty ratios through national strategic needsChapter
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty19:08Carrier limits in a battlecruiser treatyNotable Point
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty36:14A treaty each power has reason to keepNotable Point
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty39:49Why Washington wanted Britain's older capital ships goneNotable Point
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty52:27Japan's Kongo force and new battleship choicesChapter
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty1:05:50USS Washington and the US sixteen-inch battle lineNotable Point
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty1:13:01Could a stronger Washington settlement improve London?Notable Point
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...7:08Why unbuilt capital ships are revealingChapter
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...28:27What completed Borodinos might have changedNotable Point
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...56:47South Dakota and Lexington as a fleet systemChapter
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...1:03:43Japan's Eight-Eight fleet meets yard capacityChapter
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...1:16:57Normandie, Lyon, and French design momentumChapter
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty5:34Why battlecruisers need a separate treaty categoryChapter
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty11:23The 5:5:3 ratio and America’s fifteen-ship battle lineNotable Point
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty20:40Why the historical treaty gave America no Lexington battlecruiserQ&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty22:14Carrier limits, ratios, and the conversion exceptionNotable Point
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty25:01A treaty with battlecruiser tonnage of its ownChapter
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty34:53Could America force Britain to accept the treaty terms?Q&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty36:02Why the alternate treaty does not cap battleship speedQ&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty47:35Cruisers and small carriers outside the main limitsNotable Point
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty47:47Why French heavy cruisers cannot answer Italian battleshipsQ&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty50:05Why France accepted naval parity with ItalyQ&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty53:43The Royal Navy's likely post-E-class cruiserQ&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty54:38How Hermes opens a small-carrier loopholeQ&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty1:04:51What replaces the historical capital-ship building holiday?Q&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty1:06:09Why 12,000 tons does not yet make a heavy cruiserQ&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty1:16:47Why other powers remain unlikely capital-ship buildersQ&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty1:20:10Washington treaty rules for warships built for exportQ&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty1:48:08Why the cruiser ceiling stops at 9.2-inch gunsQ&A
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 103:49:12The Washington Naval Treaty as a narrow diplomatic successNotable Point
- Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series1:44:05A surviving Russian Empire at the Washington conferenceQ&A
- Bruships 125: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series3:10Why Britain did not press for an 18-inch treaty limitQ&A
- Jutland with Competent Leadership of the British Battlecruiser Fleet - Sturdee replaces Beatty1:15:09Sturdee, the Washington treaty, and naval aviationNotable Point
- Patreon 86: Jutland with Competent British Battlecruiser Fleet Commander - Sturdee replaces Beatty2:47:46A higher baseline for naval limitationNotable Point
- Patreon 86: Jutland with Competent British Battlecruiser Fleet Commander - Sturdee replaces Beatty2:54:10Would Britain trade down at Washington?Q&A
- Patreon 86: Jutland with Competent British Battlecruiser Fleet Commander - Sturdee replaces Beatty3:00:28How would later battleships fit a higher treaty baseline?Q&A
- Patreon 86: Jutland with Competent British Battlecruiser Fleet Commander - Sturdee replaces Beatty3:03:08How would a decisive Jutland change cruisers?Q&A
- Bruships 124: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series29:47An 18,000-ton treaty cruiser conceptQ&A
- Bruships 124: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series51:56Carrier conversions and treaty replacement tonnageQ&A
- Bruships 124: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series1:28:37Why Germany could not quickly exploit larger treaty limitsQ&A
- HMS Formidable(1898): Lessons of a Highly Conventional Carreer - Key Ship Series 6, Ship 41:04:09Could naval treaties have preserved sovereign battleships?Notable Point
- Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics1:12:12An F3-style Nelson under a 42,000-ton treaty limitQ&A
- Bruships: Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:21:00A faster Nelson under a 40,000-ton treatyQ&A
- Bruships: Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:21:23What a 16,000-ton treaty cruiser looks likeQ&A
- Bruships 122: Patreon Special - how wooden ships between 1700 to 1860 are built13:47Which cancelled battlecruisers mattered most?Q&A
- Bruships 122: Patreon Special - how wooden ships between 1700 to 1860 are built2:16:38K3 and L3 designs as treaty pressureQ&A
- Bruships 122: Patreon Special - how wooden ships between 1700 to 1860 are built2:25:54Adapting the G3 to a 45,000-ton treaty limitQ&A
- Bruships 122: Patreon Special - how wooden ships between 1700 to 1860 are built2:48:47How America might answer a 44-ship British battle fleetQ&A
- Bruships 122: Patreon Special - how wooden ships between 1700 to 1860 are built2:51:01Turning hotel-room surveillance into treaty leverageQ&A
- Patreon 83: What were the most serious mistakes made in WWII based on WWI experience?18:44Why Fascist Italy retained pockets of institutional continuityNotable Point
- Battleships of the Treaty Era1:35Why a naval treaty needs shared incentivesChapter
- Battleships of the Treaty Era7:34American eavesdropping at the Washington ConferenceNotable Point
- Battleships of the Treaty Era33:31Replacement rights and keeping shipyards aliveChapter
- Battleships of the Treaty Era1:11:26A Japanese replacement-rights counterfactualNotable Point
- Battleships of the Treaty Era1:14:39Why treaty controls broke downChapter
- Battleships of the Treaty Era1:19:44Japanese security fears under the treaty systemNotable Point
- Battleships of the Treaty Era1:22:04Could rolling quotas have saved the treaty system?Notable Point
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!27:11Why American accounts overstated Washington treaty successQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!1:57:50What happens if Britain hides over-limit G3sQ&A
- HMS Incomparable: When Jackie Fisher Dreamed to Big - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 844:04Three counterfactual tests for Fisher and treaty-era warshipsNotable Point
- A150 & BB64; After Yamato - Key Ship Series 4, Ships 732:27French treaty parity and the cost of global presenceNotable Point
- Number 13 Class: Dreams of Yamatos - Key Ship Series 4, Ship 67:14A delayed treaty system changes battleship baselinesChapter
- Number 13 Class: Dreams of Yamatos - Key Ship Series 4, Ship 69:23A later naval treaty does not remove the political crisesNotable Point
- Number 13 Class: Dreams of Yamatos - Key Ship Series 4, Ship 623:55Treaty interruption between Number 13 and YamatoNotable Point
- Mistakes & Missed Opportunities of the Washington Naval Treaties0:45Treaty limits did not prevent naval preparationChapter
- Mistakes & Missed Opportunities of the Washington Naval Treaties5:32Why destroyers were not the central treaty failureNotable Point
- Mistakes & Missed Opportunities of the Washington Naval Treaties19:27An Empire cruiser baseline before the London TreatyNotable Point
- Mistakes & Missed Opportunities of the Washington Naval Treaties35:18Why French parity with Italy was strategically awkwardChapter
- Mistakes & Missed Opportunities of the Washington Naval Treaties39:01Cruiser construction as presence and treaty leverageNotable Point
- Mistakes & Missed Opportunities of the Washington Naval Treaties1:23:47Why sloops were a mistake but cruisers an opportunityNotable Point
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?22:27What counts as a treaty mistake?Chapter
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?52:05Would cheaper cruisers have persuaded Canada to build more?Q&A
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?56:57Why County-class cruisers used four twin turretsQ&A
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?59:46Would France have left the treaty over Caracciolo?Q&A
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?1:05:16Why use ship categories instead of one tonnage allowance?Q&A
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?1:08:49What if Italy had retained all four Caracciolo hulls?Q&A
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?1:26:40French parity with Italy and strategic dependenceChapter
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?1:34:09What diplomatic advantages did Britain gain at Washington?Q&A
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?1:36:34Could France have negotiated more tonnage than Italy?Q&A
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?1:53:31Did Dominion ships count against British treaty limits?Q&A
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?1:57:58What the 20-knot sloop rule actually limitedQ&A
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?2:00:47Could a mass of sloops threaten a battleship?Q&A
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?2:02:06Why not an Indian cruiser with triple six-inch turrets?Q&A
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?2:03:00Japan's missed alternative to the Kaga conversionChapter
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?2:04:12Japan's opportunity to conceal extra submarinesNotable Point
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?2:08:44Did the treaties prevent naval infrastructure investment?Q&A
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?2:13:32Where did the treaty restrict fortifications?Q&A
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?2:18:33Could coastal guns preserve future battleship armament?Q&A
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?2:46:41Could a treaty battlecarrier keep battleship guns?Q&A
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?2:47:14Could Australia and New Zealand keep battlecruisers?Q&A
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?3:06:01Treaties as an excuse for underinvestmentChapter
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?3:09:11Why equitable treaties encourage complianceNotable Point
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer16:45How an H3a battlecruiser could raise treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer1:04:40Completing the Admiral class before treaty limitsNotable Point
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer1:13:07Completed Admirals could transform the Washington settlementNotable Point
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer2:00:42What a higher treaty limit could do to Nelson and RodneyQ&A
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer3:31:44How unused Nelson-class tonnage affected a wartime pursuitNotable Point
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...0:11Reading a treaty through its delegatesChapter
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...1:19American citizens and the authority to sign a treatyNotable Point
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...6:11American status, spending, and Senate ratificationChapter
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...7:28British delegates and differing views on disarmamentNotable Point
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...9:24New Zealand's naval protection and manpower limitsNotable Point
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...23:05British disarmament ideals and imperial cruiser needsChapter
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...27:46Treaty limits and the problem of enforcementNotable Point
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...40:10Why one Commonwealth navy mattered to the ratiosNotable Point
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...59:11French disarmament required German weaknessNotable Point
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...1:02:37France, Italy, and the cost of naval parityChapter
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...1:04:37Sarraut, Jusserand, and France's fleet allowanceNotable Point
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...1:15:31Japan's seven-to-ten risk-fleet logicChapter
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...1:27:14Testing treaty arithmetic with an Australian capital shipNotable Point
- Governments of the Washington Treaty: What were their priorities?7:40Reading treaty priorities from the delegatesChapter
- Governments of the Washington Treaty: What were their priorities?22:14Hughes and Harding in the cabinet photographNotable Point
- Governments of the Washington Treaty: What were their priorities?31:06Why 30, 19, and 17 were not equivalent cutsNotable Point
- Governments of the Washington Treaty: What were their priorities?39:47Why Washington sent Hughes, Lodge, Underwood, and RootNotable Point
- Governments of the Washington Treaty: What were their priorities?2:15:57Washington fills a gap left by America's Versailles refusalNotable Point
- Governments of the Washington Treaty: What were their priorities?3:12:57Japan's naval minister, diplomats, and political advisersChapter
- Governments of the Washington Treaty: What were their priorities?3:26:45The gap between treaty limits and national aimsNotable Point
- Governments of the Washington Treaty: What were their priorities?3:28:34The 5:5:3 ratio: economy for some, insecurity for JapanNotable Point
- Governments of the Washington Treaty: What were their priorities?3:29:28What a 7:10 Japanese ratio might have builtNotable Point
- Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture52:01When a treaty-era cruiser would replace the battlecruiser AustraliaQ&A
- Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture1:00:20Would renaming early battlecruisers change their treaty treatment?Q&A
- Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture1:41:22A separate treaty category would need a battlecruiser benchmarkQ&A
- Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture2:39:11Why dividing the High Seas Fleet could have destabilised naval treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy23:21Treaty ratios can trigger a construction raceQ&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy2:28:45Carrier conversions depended on which Lexington hulls survivedQ&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy2:30:47Why a delayed Washington treaty could raise the stakesQ&A
- Bruships 116: Australia Trip Books... Continued21:20A separate treaty allowance for light carriersQ&A
- Bruships 116: Australia Trip Books... Continued1:04:53A 27,000-ton Ark Royal and Britain's carrier numbers problemQ&A
- Inglorious 6th of July: Battle of Grenada(1779) & Battle of Algeciras(1801)3:47:08The Washington system allowed export construction with disclosureQ&A
- Lexington & Saratoga Carrier Conception: Key Ship Series 3, Ships 10 &1111:12Treaty limits did not require eight-inch gunsChapter
- Bruships 115: Hopefully Australia Trip in Summary!2:19:36A modified treaty could preserve battleship-building skillsQ&A
- Bruships 115: Hopefully Australia Trip in Summary!2:24:22American war debts were weaker treaty leverage than fearedQ&A
- Jeune Ecole: A Cheaper Way of War? The Jeune Ecole36:20Interwar France mixes doctrine but underuses treaty freedomChapter
- USS Texas: Key Ship Series 3, Ship 235:18Texas enforced naval arms limitation against USS WashingtonNotable Point
- US Treaty Cruisers in War & Retrospect: Comment Response13:51Why Lexington's 8-inch guns were a poor carrier compromiseQ&A
- What books did I bring for #NavHistAus23?6:41Japanese treaty acceptance and the Nagato classQ&A
- Bruships 114: Alternate Histories, What Ifs & Questions from Chat45:24A Royal Navy built around four Admiral-class shipsQ&A
- Bruships 114: Alternate Histories, What Ifs & Questions from Chat55:28Treaty limits, capital ships, and carrier developmentQ&A
- Bruships 114: Alternate Histories, What Ifs & Questions from Chat2:18:09Why interwar fleet totals need matching planning horizonsQ&A
- Bruships 113: Jutland7:00Why widespread warship sales would wreck the treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships 113: Jutland14:30Why a much larger British fleet changes the Washington premiseQ&A
- Bruships 113: Jutland1:04:22A 1917 Jutland and the Admiral-class programmeQ&A
- Bruships 113: Jutland1:28:43Why Dominion fleets counted with the Royal NavyQ&A
- Building a NelRod County Class...1:08:00Imperial warship transfers and American treaty fearsQ&A
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done29:54Would K3s have changed naval treaty politics?Notable Point
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done1:54:29How Caracciolo could alter British carrier conversionsNotable Point
- Bruships 111: Random Books of History1:50:05N3 and G3 cancellation as a treaty decisionQ&A
- Bruships 111: Random Books of History2:19:44Treaty permission would not save every dreadnoughtQ&A
- Bruships 111: Random Books of History2:41:36The narrow window to transfer Princess RoyalQ&A
- Bruships 111: Random Books of History2:48:24Why a twelve-gun armored treaty cruiser does not fitQ&A
- Lexington Class Battle Cruisers: Key Ship Series 2, Ship 424:18Why treaty survival would encourage heavy modernizationNotable Point
- Lexington Class Battle Cruisers: Key Ship Series 2, Ship 426:56What treaty limits removed from naval planningChapter
- Mayfly to the Future: A History of Naval Aviation15:01Aircraft generations raced past treaty-limited warshipsNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 32:36The missing generation between Hood and NelsonChapter
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 326:36A K3 counterfactual: treaty limits and rival responsesNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 328:02Francesco Caracciolo and a harder Mediterranean treaty bargainNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 328:50Yamato-level firepower, not Yamato-level protectionNotable Point
- Ship-Shape Special: Alex & Garius Command a Carrier... How bad can this be?53:27Lexington and Saratoga against treaty displacement limitsQ&A
- Bruships 110: Naval Aviation1:53:41Why naval treaties needed a destroyer-leader categoryQ&A
- Bruships 110: Naval Aviation2:50:09More treaty categories create more boundary problemsQ&A
- Bruships 110: Naval Aviation3:26:59County-class cruisers and the treaty's spiritQ&A
- Bruships 109: Mahan, an inspiration & a Reflection + Bonus50:05How a larger French fleet rewrites treaty arithmeticQ&A
- Royal Navy retains the 'Fleet Units' of Royal Naval Air Service in 1918 - an Alternate History42:52Treaty space for a scout-carrier fleetChapter
- Royal Navy retains the 'Fleet Units' of Royal Naval Air Service in 1918 - an Alternate History50:27How scout-carrier quotas reshape other naviesNotable Point
- Royal Navy retains the 'Fleet Units' of Royal Naval Air Service in 1918 - an Alternate History1:00:56Treaty limits became a political funding floorNotable Point
- Royal Navy retains the 'Fleet Units' of Royal Naval Air Service in 1918 - an Alternate History1:49:05Scout carriers as a new treaty-era status shipNotable Point
- Alternate History - Royal Navy retains the Fleet 'units' of Royal Naval Air Service: Patreon 761:21:00A Washington treaty category for scout carriersChapter
- Alternate History - Royal Navy retains the Fleet 'units' of Royal Naval Air Service: Patreon 761:30:02Experimental carriers can be replaced before the age limitNotable Point
- Alternate History - Royal Navy retains the Fleet 'units' of Royal Naval Air Service: Patreon 761:49:33Could Japan present Soryu as a scout carrier?Q&A
- Alternate History - Royal Navy retains the Fleet 'units' of Royal Naval Air Service: Patreon 761:59:48Dominion carriers still count against British treaty limitsQ&A
- Alternate History - Royal Navy retains the Fleet 'units' of Royal Naval Air Service: Patreon 762:08:56Why scout carriers stay within 12,000 tonsQ&A
- Alternate History - Royal Navy retains the Fleet 'units' of Royal Naval Air Service: Patreon 763:13:12Japan's scout-carrier allowance favours a size tradeoffNotable Point
- Alternate History - Royal Navy retains the Fleet 'units' of Royal Naval Air Service: Patreon 763:28:09A separate treaty scenario permits a much larger carrier forceNotable Point
- Bruships 107: Some New to Me Books & Some New from Pen & Sword31:25Revealing Washington Treaty intelligenceQ&A
- Help I Inadvertently Built a Super Bismarck...2:05:43What would a 45,000-ton treaty battleship demand?Notable Point
- Bruships 106: Song Dynasty & Three New Books from Pen & Sword1:53:02Dry-dock inspection could expose treaty-breaking cruisersQ&A
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?1:16:48Completed fast battleships could force higher treaty limitsChapter
- Patreon 74: What if History - Greenboy shells had been developed and deployed in time for Jutland.2:53:04A decisive battle favours fast battleships over battlecruisersNotable Point
- Patreon 74: What if History - Greenboy shells had been developed and deployed in time for Jutland.3:03:26Which administration laid the groundwork for the Washington Naval Treaty?Q&A
- A potential American Response to the 18in HMS Agincourt?42:14Agincourt could change Washington, not VersaillesNotable Point
- Bruships 105: Six Age of Sail Useful Books10:14Why older capital ships would become treaty tonnage placeholdersQ&A
- Steam Rates: When the Wooden Wall gained a hiss & a huff!21:28Britain’s industrial scale made repeated steam-rate development possibleChapter
- Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response1:42:47Why three turrets remained unattractive to British battleship designersQ&A
- Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response1:45:27Comparing Queen Elizabeth and Revenge displacement figuresQ&A
- Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?1:04:15When technical supremacy changes the contestNotable Point
- Patreon 73: Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?35:59Did Queen Elizabeth set the Washington treaty standard?Q&A
- Gunboats of the 1920s, 1930s & WWII including Dragonfly Class23:54War debt, treaty trust, and an interwar naval arms raceNotable Point
- Gunboats of the 1920s, 1930s & WWII including Dragonfly Class27:40Anglo-American cooperation on the Yangtze PatrolNotable Point
- The Great Ships: 1st, 2nd & 3rd Rates in 18th Century (Comment Response)40:09Lexington conversions and the Admiral-class responseQ&A
- Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?48:24Treaty tonnage and missed fast carriersNotable Point
- Bruships 99: Political History, Geostrategic History & Naval History2:37:18How the Washington and London treaties constrained cruisers differentlyQ&A
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?1:15:13Treaty tonnage and the fast-task-force gapChapter
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?1:27:00France had yards available for carrier constructionNotable Point
- Bruships 97: Random Books, Naval Chat & Possibly the Sound of Rain2:50:25Nelson and Rodney were treaty products, not pre-treaty survivorsNotable Point
- Bruships 97: Random Books, Naval Chat & Possibly the Sound of Rain3:08:11Hood needed a global network of longer dry docksQ&A
- US Treaty Cruiser in War & Retrospect6:56Lexington carriers and the scout-force tradeoffNotable Point
- US Treaty Cruiser in War & Retrospect10:15Pacific scouting and war-plan assumptionsNotable Point
- New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...52:08Without Washington, battleship and carrier construction would accelerateQ&A
- New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...1:53:51Naval treaties contracted the shipbuilding workloadQ&A
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers1:27:15What the Washington treaty actually limitedQ&A
- Soviet Navy 1918-199150:38Treaty parity would not solve Soviet fleet divisionNotable Point
- Soviet Navy 1918-199159:53Would Soviet treaty membership require inviting South American navies?Q&A
- Soviet Navy 1918-19911:02:27Would Lenin accept naval parity with Japan?Q&A
- Soviet Navy 1918-19911:08:46Would Lenin's suspicion of the West prevent treaty participation?Q&A
- Soviet Navy 1918-19911:09:23A Soviet treaty allowance could change Japanese and German planningQ&A
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat1:21:12A British alternative at the Washington Naval ConferenceQ&A
- USS Wichita(CA-45); The Greatest Treaty 8in Cruiser4:37How treaty rules reshaped the heavy cruiserNotable Point
- Cruiser Policy of the Reichsmarine & Kriegsmarine45:18From treaty-system exclusion to the D-class escalationChapter
- Cruiser Policy of the Reichsmarine & Kriegsmarine55:48Cruiser policy as a chain of reactions rather than a strategyNotable Point
- Soviet Navy Part 1/3: 1918-193926:15Outside the Washington treaty systemNotable Point
- Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response34:24Could different Washington Treaty ratios have delayed war?Q&A
- Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response57:05Why an unrestricted navy would not build the F3Q&A
- Washington Cheaties: Comment Response24:34Why Washington treaty rules weaken the case for Lexington's eight-inch gunsNotable Point
- Washington Cheaties: Comment Response32:39Treaty diplomacy, public opinion, and what navies chose to protectNotable Point
- Washington Cheaties: Comment Response49:03How the Washington treaty became a modern arms-control modelChapter
- Washington Cheaties: Comment Response1:00:38How more US cruisers might have changed later treaty bargainingNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships18:39The Washington Treaty squeezes Britain's battle lineChapter
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships22:11Britain's constructor bench tackles the treaty tradeoffsNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships24:59The fast F3 and its 15-inch/50 alternativeNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships28:53Why 16-inch prestige defeated the faster F3Chapter
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships39:39Nelson's compact machinery and disputed top speedNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships44:18Why water counted as cheap treaty protectionNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships48:26Why Nelson's treaty engineering irritated Admiral KingNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships52:12Nelson's treaty margin and the Lexington comparisonNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships53:40Nelson as the home-fleet apex behind Hood's prestigeNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships55:13Why two treaty battleships could not fill Britain's global stationsNotable Point
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?38:39Would Britain keep building battlecruisers without the Washington Treaty?Q&A
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?59:37How the Washington Treaty interrupted capital-ship developmentChapter
- Bruships 92: New Books, Naval Chat and Late 19th Century Warships...2:18:01How the Royal Navy might spend 80,000 extra treaty tonsQ&A
- Bruships 91: New Books & Cruiser Books1:43:01Why Washington Naval Conference politics needs several booksQ&A
- Bruships 91: New Books & Cruiser Books4:17:46Why the United States favored a 35,000-ton limitQ&A
- Washington "Cheaties'': an Inevitability of Winning a Treaty10:52Washington Treaty limits reveal the carrier's importanceChapter
- Washington "Cheaties'': an Inevitability of Winning a Treaty23:55Why Lexington's tonnage breach mattered more than cruiser cheatingQ&A
- Washington "Cheaties'': an Inevitability of Winning a Treaty25:23Lexington's tonnage breach risked the entire carrier settlementChapter
- Washington "Cheaties'': an Inevitability of Winning a Treaty32:47Carrier tonnage rules produced fragile fleet numbersChapter
- Washington "Cheaties'': an Inevitability of Winning a Treaty47:31A 10:7 ratio could give Japan status while strengthening deterrenceChapter
- Washington "Cheaties'': an Inevitability of Winning a Treaty48:40Why naval arms races do not automatically cause warNotable Point
- Washington "Cheaties'': an Inevitability of Winning a Treaty54:00The building holiday redirected competition into reconstructionChapter
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:22What counts as cheating under a naval treaty?Chapter
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"8:25Why HMS Hood did not carry Britain to WashingtonQ&A
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"27:18Washington's capital-ship quotas and the navies left outsideChapter
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"31:42Why 35,000 tons forced capital-ship compromisesChapter
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"35:53Carrier ceilings produced fleets too small for reliable availabilityChapter
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"53:27Carrier gun rules favored Britain's six-inch preferenceNotable Point
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"57:00The 5:3 ratio deepened Japan's security dilemmaChapter
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:00:18American surveillance revealed Japan's minimum acceptable ratioNotable Point
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:03:32Which power left Washington most dissatisfied?Q&A
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:03:51Treaty rules reached merchant conversions, foreign orders, and Pacific basesChapter
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:04:18Britain repeated the wartime seizure Article 17 was meant to stopNotable Point
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:08:53Did the Washington Treaty save Japan from bankruptcy?Q&A
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:10:06A more workable set of Washington Treaty limitsQ&A
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:13:36Replacement rules froze construction but permitted selective modernizationChapter
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:17:28Lexington's precise tonnage claim damaged American credibilityChapter
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:32:25How Australian warships counted under the treatyQ&A
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:32:47Ryūjō tested the sub-10,000-ton carrier loopholeChapter
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:43:38What standard displacement counted aboard a carrierQ&A
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:44:52Could Washington separate Dominion navies from Britain?Q&A
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"2:00:07County-class cruisers were designed to receive armor laterChapter
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"2:05:54What remained after treaty battleships were scrappedQ&A
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"2:35:57Cruiser submarines exploited an unlimited treaty categoryChapter
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"2:55:27Nelson and Rodney stayed below the treaty ceiling yet used water as protectionChapter
- Shortcomings of Early Aircraft Carriers: What Lessons can we Learn from Innovation?8:15Argus and Langley as useful experimental carriersNotable Point
- Shortcomings of Early Aircraft Carriers: What Lessons can we Learn from Innovation?10:28Hosho and Hermes prove that carrier roles matterChapter
- Shortcomings of Early Aircraft Carriers: What Lessons can we Learn from Innovation?55:29Ark Royal left treaty tonnage unusedChapter
- Shortcomings of Early Aircraft Carriers: What Lessons can we Learn from Innovation?1:12:09Wasp squeezed a fleet carrier into too little tonnageNotable Point
- Shortcomings with the designs of 'Early' Aircraft Carriers: Patreon 651:20:25Courageous and Glorious retained a doctrinally obsolete deckChapter
- Shortcomings with the designs of 'Early' Aircraft Carriers: Patreon 651:42:20Lexington and Saratoga carried the wrong defensive weightChapter
- Shortcomings with the designs of 'Early' Aircraft Carriers: Patreon 652:11:44Ark Royal could have combined armor and a large air groupChapter
- Shortcomings with the designs of 'Early' Aircraft Carriers: Patreon 652:18:18How Admiral-class carriers could reshape interwar aviationQ&A
- Shortcomings with the designs of 'Early' Aircraft Carriers: Patreon 652:52:00Geography made armored carriers rational for BritainQ&A
- Bruships 89: New Books (Christmas Recomendations) & Personal Accounts of War1:08:05Six Lexingtons require funding and provoke British constructionQ&A
- Bruships 89: New Books (Christmas Recomendations) & Personal Accounts of War1:13:34Six Lexington conversions would not be identicalNotable Point
- Bruships 89: New Books (Christmas Recomendations) & Personal Accounts of War2:18:42American conversions supply the case for three Admiral carriersQ&A
- Battle of Navarino(1827): A Failure of Deterrence or Expecting too Much?58:18Why gun counts overstated Ottoman combat powerNotable Point
- Bruships 88: Way of War31:32Would Lexington battlecruisers trigger a naval race?Q&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History39:06Treaty persistence and Germany's missing fleet infrastructureChapter
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 6432:13Did Hood's size trap Britain at Washington?Q&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 641:03:22Could the United States have converted a third battlecruiser?Q&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 642:08:03Would broader naval treaties have worked better?Q&A
- Bruships 86: Science Fiction Strikes Some More2:27:47American fast battleships would prevent a treaty settlementQ&A
- Escort Carriers, the idea, designs, development and some notable operations1:41Why trade-protection carriers stalled before the warChapter
- Escort Carriers, the idea, designs, development and some notable operations17:26Treaties and budgets narrow the small-carrier opportunityChapter
- Escort Carriers, the idea, designs, development and some notable operations1:00:15A separate treaty category might have preserved small-carrier capacityNotable Point
- Patreon 63: Escort carriers, the idea, designs, development and notable operations7:42Why Britain kept to carrier treaty limitsQ&A
- Patreon 63: Escort carriers, the idea, designs, development and notable operations9:28Why relabeling carriers did not create treaty tonnageQ&A
- Patreon 63: Escort carriers, the idea, designs, development and notable operations14:39What treaty clause could have enabled escort carriers?Q&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1941-4217:15Carrier development without the Washington Naval TreatyQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1941-4234:14Why a 14-inch autoloader was a practical upper edgeQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1941-4255:23Turning a huge treaty allowance into a balanced fleetQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1941-421:19:40A 120,000-ton British battleship under expanded treaty limitsQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-4029:26The Nelson class was strong but too slowQ&A
- Selborne Fisher Scheme: It's Conception, Creation, Implementation, Operation and Discontinuation5:52Treaty-era procurement complicates the battleship-centric labelNotable Point
- Algerie (1932): Marine National0:44Algérie as a treaty-cruiser breakthroughChapter
- Algerie (1932): Marine National13:35Standard displacement versus a fully loaded AlgérieNotable Point
- Algerie (1932): Marine National21:26Treaty limits froze earlier ships while French design advancedNotable Point
- Algerie (1932): Marine National27:30Could an unbuilt treaty cruiser have surpassed Algérie?Notable Point
- Infrastructure in the Colonies: shipyards of the Commonwealth and Empire.20:08Steady batches and treaty space could have preserved Australian yardsChapter
- Infrastructure in the Colonies: shipyards of the Commonwealth and Empire.39:47The 1934 naval estimates contained a serious case for disarmamentChapter
- Patreon 59: Infrastructure in the Colonies: shipyards of the Commonwealth and Empire.2:42:54How dividing the High Seas Fleet could reshape naval treatiesQ&A
- Town Class (1910): Bristols & Weymouths0:09From protected cruisers to the heavy-cruiser limitChapter
- Bruships 82: New Books, Fun Books & Random Books48:48A faster Nelson and Rodney under a looser treaty limitNotable Point
- Kirov Class Cruisers (Soviet Navy)2:08Italian design aid meets Soviet industrial recoveryChapter
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today54:44How a 1934 paper defined the aircraft carrierChapter
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today1:54:39Why active fleet spending undermines naval treatiesQ&A
- Reginae Maris Nostri: The Cruisers of Mussolini's Regia Marina16:12Washington Treaty equality fed Italy's military backlashNotable Point
- Reginae Maris Nostri: The Cruisers of Mussolini's Regia Marina26:38Trento class: heavy guns, high speed, thin armorChapter
- Projecting Mussonlini's Mare Nostrum: Italian 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine44:52Naval treaties make cruisers Italy's status unitsChapter
- Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack1:39:23If the High Seas Fleet had not been scuttledQ&A
- Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack1:47:03A German High Seas Fleet in the treaty eraQ&A
- Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack1:55:12Why Britain did not want captured German battleshipsNotable Point
- Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack2:02:49Keeping Lexington-class battlecruisers at WashingtonQ&A
- Modern Frigates: Cruisers by another name? (Patreon 57 Videos Comment Response)27:20Why naval treaties need politically usable escape mechanismsQ&A
- French 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine (Live)11:09What if French armored cruisers had survived the Washington Treaty?Q&A
- French 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine (Live)1:00:06What ended France's surviving armored cruisers?Q&A
- Northampton Class: US Treaty Cruisers (Long Patrol)0:00Why the Northampton class was a scout cruiser in heavy-cruiser clothingChapter
- Northampton Class: US Treaty Cruisers (Long Patrol)1:08:19Treaty timing and lost battlecruisers created the Northampton requirementNotable Point
- Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions1:40:04A Washington Treaty that transfers surplus capital shipsQ&A
- Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions2:53:48How completed Lexingtons could preserve the G3sQ&A
- Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions3:01:18How French super-dreadnoughts could alter the Washington TreatyQ&A
- Suffren Class: Mon croiseur de 1ère classe de la Marine Nationale préféré (Long Patrol)1:12Why France called the Suffrens first-class cruisersChapter
- Suffren Class: Mon croiseur de 1ère classe de la Marine Nationale préféré (Long Patrol)1:19:20Designing a treaty system for first-class and true heavy cruisersNotable Point
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)12:56Why a 42,000-ton limit need not force wholesale replacementQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)16:39Japanese security and the proposed seven-to-ten ratioQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)19:54Why the 35,000-ton battleship limit was politically attractiveNotable Point
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)24:17How the construction holiday created a catch-up incentiveQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)50:27Keynes's warning about treaty damage to British industryNotable Point
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)57:43G3 orders and the information gap before WashingtonNotable Point
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)1:03:18Why the Pacific fortification clause disadvantaged JapanChapter
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)1:09:01How the treaty left powers weaker and less secureChapter
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)1:10:16Could gun turrets survive treaty scrapping?Q&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:34:22How naval professional input declined across the treaty systemNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)5:45Why arms limits can create a balance of weaknessChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)15:02The political assumptions behind the alternate treatyNotable Point
- Introduction to US Cruiser Strategy in the 1920s & 1930s (Long Patrol)5:37A 1923 fleet organization with no cruiser componentChapter
- Introduction to US Cruiser Strategy in the 1920s & 1930s (Long Patrol)9:13Why the scouting force began with slow battleshipsChapter
- Equitable London Treaties: Submarines & Fortifications (Long Patrol)2:47The fortification freeze carried into the London treatiesNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaties: Submarines & Fortifications (Long Patrol)22:19Washington Treaty fortification status quoChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)22:23The Washington cruiser loophole and industrial capacityNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaties: Cruisers (Long Patrol)0:00Using an equitable treaty counterfactual to test historyChapter
- Pensacola Class: US Interwar Cruisers (Long Patrol)1:44The many design paths behind the Pensacola classChapter
- Pensacola Class: US Interwar Cruisers (Long Patrol)3:01Anglo-American competition did not make war inevitableNotable Point
- Pensacola Class: US Interwar Cruisers (Long Patrol)7:37Ten guns, a fine hull, and the price in stabilityChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)25:40The 1930 treaty defines the aircraft carrierChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)41:03British carrier numbers versus American carrier sizeNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)46:52Lexington and Saratoga set the real carrier benchmarkChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)8:00Why France and Italy received different capital-ship and carrier ratiosNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)9:22Why the 35,000-ton battleship limit looked unrealisticChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)14:48Why the counterfactual keeps a 16-inch gun ceilingNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)15:52Japan's security case for a 7:10 fleet ratioChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)21:54A 42,000-ton capital-ship settlement with staged replacementChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)27:05Why the treaty could permit forty-eight County-class cruisersNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)32:26Carrier tonnage, conversions, and the transition to new buildsChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)32:32How one capital-ship category encouraged fast battleshipsNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)35:20A carrier-conversion loophole and the treaty's enforcement gapNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)46:17Pacific fortification limits and Japanese insecurityChapter
- My Royal Navy Washington Treaty Cruiser: with added Qs from "1939 Destroyer Doctrine" (Long Patrol)0:10Why the County class was not the only treaty-cruiser answerChapter
- My Royal Navy Washington Treaty Cruiser: with added Qs from "1939 Destroyer Doctrine" (Long Patrol)3:23Why treaty cruisers and destroyers became one force-design problemNotable Point
- My Royal Navy Washington Treaty Cruiser: with added Qs from "1939 Destroyer Doctrine" (Long Patrol)37:35What is historical in the simulated London-class cruiserNotable Point
- My Royal Navy Washington Treaty Cruiser: with added Qs from "1939 Destroyer Doctrine" (Long Patrol)1:09:34Why Japan shaped Royal Navy cruiser requirementsChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Other Ships & Fortifications (Long Patrol)0:19Why maximal treaty demands risked alienating JapanChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Other Ships & Fortifications (Long Patrol)8:21The 5:5:3 ratio stopped below capital shipsChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Other Ships & Fortifications (Long Patrol)12:10Washington Treaty rules for other shipsChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Other Ships & Fortifications (Long Patrol)18:28Submarine bans and cruiser ratios that failedChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Other Ships & Fortifications (Long Patrol)19:45Who shaped the treaty-cruiser ceiling?Notable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Other Ships & Fortifications (Long Patrol)23:57Article 19 froze Pacific bases and defensesChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Other Ships & Fortifications (Long Patrol)27:34How tactical bargaining success can undermine strategyNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Other Ships & Fortifications (Long Patrol)30:09Why the equitable rewrite keeps the cruiser ceilingNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Other Ships & Fortifications (Long Patrol)41:14A durable treaty cannot leave one side feeling defeatedChapter
- A Quick Outline of the Equitable Treaty Series0:51Washington Treaty subjects in the seriesChapter
- 2022 Canada Naval History Trip Reading List (Long Patrol Book Review)9:36Treaty-era designs after WashingtonChapter
- 2022 Canada Naval History Trip Reading List (Long Patrol Book Review)15:43Akagi's reconstruction and Japan's industrial limitsNotable Point
- Boadicea Class (1907): Scout Cruiser (Long Patrol)20:15Pembroke shows what Britain lost when naval yards stopped buildingChapter
- Galaxy Class: A Naval Historian's view of Federation Cruisers & Ships of the 24th Century (Live)1:22:39Weapon restrictions are not the same as fleet limitsQ&A
- Patreon 53: Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN2:27How battleship losses at Jutland might have reshaped British designQ&A
- Bruships 79: Eight New Books, plus Discussions of a Naval Nature4:36Why a postwar German battle fleet would alarm FranceQ&A
- Bruships 79: Eight New Books, plus Discussions of a Naval Nature1:57:25Exposed treaty eavesdropping could collapse the naval settlementQ&A
- Bruships 79: Eight New Books, plus Discussions of a Naval Nature2:07:14Several Hoods would change the Washington Treaty bargainQ&A
- Cut Price County Questions and a Modern Battle Cruiser: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)21:42Starting research on Washington Treaty cost savingsQ&A
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...6:48Why an asymmetric Washington Treaty counterfactual failsQ&A
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...20:23Could the treaty have defined a larger heavy cruiser?Q&A
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...30:43How surviving battlecruisers might have changed the Admiral classQ&A
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...40:13How US armoured cruisers could have raised treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...3:50:16How a missed dockyard cycle constrained the Admirals and later carriersQ&A
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...4:26:44How Tiger and Leopard could lead to a 15-inch King George VQ&A
- County Class Cruiser Comment Response: A UAD Infused Discussion of the Part 8 Response (Long Patrol)0:03An equitable London Treaty begins with cruiser numbersChapter
- County Class Cruiser Comment Response: A UAD Infused Discussion of the Part 8 Response (Long Patrol)51:04Reconsidering the 10,000-ton cruiser category in 1930Chapter
- County Cruisers P8: The County Class in War and Retrospect (Long Patrol)17:48Why the Hawkins class made a poor treaty templateNotable Point
- County Cruisers P8: The County Class in War and Retrospect (Long Patrol)45:36Britain accepted the limit but never funded the numbersNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)39:34Hood's value in Washington Treaty tonnage calculationsQ&A
- Scapa Flow: A History & A Future? (Long Patrol for Patreon 52)32:22How the scuttling changed the postwar naval settlementNotable Point
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)23:49Writing treaty rules without inviting evasionsQ&A
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)30:28Security as the basis of treaty stabilityQ&A
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)31:37Do not write a treaty that requires lyingQ&A
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)35:41A 10:7 ratio and Japanese securityQ&A
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)36:53Choosing a Washington baseline for the London treatiesQ&A
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)44:59Why automatic escalation has a practical ceilingQ&A
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)46:23Aircraft carrier limits are deferred to part twoQ&A
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)57:14Two baselines for an equitable London treatyNotable Point
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)52:48Would merged treaty tonnage favour carriers?Q&A
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)55:11Treaty ratios, industrial capacity, and political willNotable Point
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)57:18Geography and imperial commitments shape fleet sizeNotable Point
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)58:53The Anglo-Japanese Alliance behind Washington security fearsNotable Point
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)1:00:26Naval treaties as British fiscal coverNotable Point
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)1:05:51Experimental carriers still counted against treaty tonnageQ&A
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)1:10:13Why treaty limits could holdQ&A
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)1:16:41Allocating carrier forces by theatreQ&A
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)1:19:25A seven-carrier British conversion program with hindsightQ&A
- Duquesne class, Marine National (Long Patrol)1:34Why Duquesne began as a light-cruiser designChapter
- Bruships 76: Five New Books & a Lot of New Questions2:30:35If the London naval treaties had failedQ&A
- RMS Titanic, 110yrs on what lessons were learned?2:10:23Could political will have completed the G3s?Q&A
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)0:21Why carriers were a difficult treaty categoryChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)12:50Carrier ratios and Japan’s strategic positionNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)17:46The Washington Treaty’s carrier tonnage rulesChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)23:53How treaty wording permitted large new-build carriersNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)40:36How imperfect carrier data shaped treaty choicesNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)44:15A proposed equitable carrier treatyChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)55:58The alternative carrier tonnage allocationsNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)1:24:29Treaty limits, security, and deterrenceChapter
- The Maple Confrontation (Equitable Washington Treaty Scenario): UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)0:13A deliberately improbable Anglo-American crisisChapter
- The Maple Confrontation (Equitable Washington Treaty Scenario): UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)5:27Why rival navies might converge on the British compromiseNotable Point
- The Maple Confrontation (Equitable Washington Treaty Scenario): UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)8:40All-forward guns as a treaty-era efficiency choiceChapter
- The Maple Confrontation (Equitable Washington Treaty Scenario): UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)1:00:01What extra treaty tonnage does for a Nelson-type shipNotable Point
- The Maple Confrontation (Equitable Washington Treaty Scenario): UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)1:04:26Continuous construction as a deterrent signalChapter
- County Cruisers P7: The Canaris Class (Long Patrol)36:30Spain had treaty freedom to protect its two flagshipsNotable Point
- County Cruisers P7: The Canaris Class (Long Patrol)49:14Trade speed and endurance for a survivable flagshipNotable Point
- County Cruisers P6: York, Exeter & The Cut Price County Concept (Long Patrol)7:47The intended Type B cruiser roleNotable Point
- County Cruisers P6: York, Exeter & The Cut Price County Concept (Long Patrol)13:34The economy case versus lost fighting powerChapter
- County Cruisers P6: York, Exeter & The Cut Price County Concept (Long Patrol)35:48A two-ship order defeated the quantity argumentNotable Point
- Bruships 75: Following the 614th Running the Gauntlet2:46:40A treaty ratio for separate battlecruiser tonnageQ&A
- 1939 Destroyer Doctrine: Patreon 50 (Long Patrol)43:26Dutch destroyers lose their planned formationChapter
- 1939 Destroyer Doctrine: Patreon 50 (Long Patrol)46:30Continuous capital-ship orders and Dutch building costsNotable Point
- 1939 Destroyer Doctrine: Patreon 50 (Long Patrol)1:15:41Destroyer doctrine outran prewar fleet readinessNotable Point
- Battle of Singapore Straits (Equitable Washington Treaty Scenario): A UAD Infused(Long Patrol)50:04All-forward designs meet canal and turret limitsChapter
- Battle of Singapore Straits (Equitable Washington Treaty Scenario): A UAD Infused(Long Patrol)53:50Controlled naval competition as deterrenceChapter
- Battle of Singapore Straits (Equitable Washington Treaty Scenario): A UAD Infused(Long Patrol)1:00:29Disarmament and the illusion of a stable status quoChapter
- Battle of Singapore Straits (Equitable Washington Treaty Scenario): A UAD Infused(Long Patrol)1:06:12Treaty ratios, Japanese insecurity and British readinessChapter
- Patreon 50: 1939 Destroyer Doctrine of the combatant navies & Where did it come from?26:18Which naval treaty actually limited destroyer sizeQ&A
- Patreon 50: 1939 Destroyer Doctrine of the combatant navies & Where did it come from?1:55:01Naval treaties tried to stop wartime seizure of export shipsQ&A
- British Light Cruisers & Treaties: A UAD Infused discussion0:48Treaty limits and the grey areaChapter
- British Light Cruisers & Treaties: A UAD Infused discussion23:41The steady drumbeat of naval ordersChapter
- British Light Cruisers & Treaties: A UAD Infused discussion26:22Treaties, deterrence, and visible industrial strengthChapter
- British Light Cruisers & Treaties: A UAD Infused discussion31:16Battlecruisers as sea-control toolsNotable Point
- British Light Cruisers & Treaties: A UAD Infused discussion41:41Postwar shock and the treaty-timing dilemmaNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)0:37Why the treaty ratios felt unequalChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)2:44A 42,000-ton capital-ship ceilingNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)9:03Why a stronger ratio could reduce insecurityNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)14:31When impractical limits make evasion normalNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)37:13Why security matters to treaty enforcementChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)1:08:08A cap arms-control advocates could defendNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)1:35:49Credible limits and continued modernizationNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)1:41:32A forward fleet needs a functioning baseNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)1:47:12Continuous construction and equitable outcomesChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)1:52:00How capital-ship limits spill into cruiser evasionNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)1:54:20A negotiating victory too complete to lastChapter
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)24:55What a ship-count treaty would incentivizeQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)36:09Why treaty declarations manipulated displacementQ&A
- Patron 49: Admiral Kimmel: A Failure of Leadership? (Live)1:16:46Why the Royal Navy resumed showing-the-flag cruisesQ&A
- Patron 49: Admiral Kimmel: A Failure of Leadership? (Live)1:20:35Why compare official treaty tonnages?Q&A
- Patron 49: Admiral Kimmel: A Failure of Leadership? (Live)1:27:29Did Britain and America share treaty definitions?Q&A
- Patron 49: Admiral Kimmel: A Failure of Leadership? (Live)2:02:22Did Americans really think Japan was weak?Q&A
- Patron 49: Admiral Kimmel: A Failure of Leadership? (Live)2:40:30How treaty superiority encouraged complacencyNotable Point
- Patron 49: Admiral Kimmel: A Failure of Leadership? (Live)2:45:08Why Hood did not overturn the treaty balanceQ&A
- Anglo Japanese War: If Tsingtao caused a war in January 1939 (Comment Response)21:52Why propose a 40,000-ton treaty limit?Q&A
- Anglo Japanese War: If Tsingtao caused a war in January 1939 (Comment Response)22:43Versailles, Washington, and the making of a world warNotable Point
- Anglo Japanese War: If Tsingtao caused a war in January 1939 (Comment Response)37:16A 10:10:7:4:4 treaty ratio for capital shipsQ&A
- Anglo-Japanese War Feb 39 - if Tsingtao incident blows up, what would be IJN doctrine? (Long Patrol)12:16Treaty limits and the appeal of big ships and big gunsNotable Point
- The 18in Gun HMS Agincourt and UAD video comment response (Long Patrol)8:21How 18-inch British ships could reshape naval treatiesNotable Point
- Patreon 48: Anglo-Japanese War in Feb 39 - if Tsingtao Incident goes "hot", what's IJN doctrine?33:16Could Japan afford the 10:10:7 treaty ratio?Q&A
- Patreon 48: Anglo-Japanese War in Feb 39 - if Tsingtao Incident goes "hot", what's IJN doctrine?1:07:09Treaty parity hid Britain's larger ready fleetNotable Point
- Patreon 48: Anglo-Japanese War in Feb 39 - if Tsingtao Incident goes "hot", what's IJN doctrine?1:08:04Big ships, big guns, and the insecurity of treaty limitsChapter
- Patreon 48: Anglo-Japanese War in Feb 39 - if Tsingtao Incident goes "hot", what's IJN doctrine?1:16:00Could more realistic treaty limits reduce conflict?Q&A
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion0:44Making Hood the treaty benchmarkChapter
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion3:41Replacement numbers make a class usableNotable Point
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion5:02From treaty tonnage to a full-load warshipNotable Point
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion42:19What 41,000 tons buys a capital shipChapter
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion48:22A Hood-based limit reshapes fleet balanceChapter
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion56:59Higher treaty ratios reshape French and Italian fleetsNotable Point
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion58:28The 35,000-ton limit lacked a clear ship benchmarkNotable Point
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion1:02:08Did negotiators know 35,000 tons meant compromise?Q&A
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion1:04:26Postwar anti-war politics behind naval limitationChapter
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion1:09:14The danger of unenforceable naval limitsNotable Point
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion1:12:22John Jordan's naval-treaty historiesNotable Point
- Bruships 73: Some Old, Some New, None Borrowed, but Some Blue3:05:23Separate Dominion battleships would upset Washington treaty parityQ&A
- All Forward 8in Cruiser & a Battle of the River Plate (RN Dream Team): A UAD Infused Discussion16:14When tonnage limits favour all-forward gunsNotable Point
- All Forward 8in Cruiser & a Battle of the River Plate (RN Dream Team): A UAD Infused Discussion24:44County cruisers and conservative treaty designChapter
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World55:22How G3 battlecruisers could reshape the wartime fleetQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World1:00:24Trading Hood for a larger treaty battle lineQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World1:05:40Why a delayed Washington Treaty could raise battleship limitsQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World1:13:32Why a larger Nelson class could trade armour for speedQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World1:33:35The narrow market for surplus dreadnoughtsQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World1:48:35Distributing surplus capital ships across the CommonwealthQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World2:13:50Paper warships as treaty bargaining toolsQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World2:14:17Why scrapping treaty capital ships could cost moneyQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World2:15:26Using treaty leverage to build a larger carrier fleetQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World2:43:26Pooling carrier and battleship tonnage in one treaty limitQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World2:45:46Replacing the Royal Navy's experimental carriers earlierQ&A
- What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)0:51Trading older capital ships for new constructionChapter
- What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)3:35Why fewer British hulls might unlock treaty consentNotable Point
- What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)36:42Five ships as the conservative treaty outcomeNotable Point
- What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)44:21Why treaty-maximum guns made the pair preciousNotable Point
- County Cruisers P5: Getting Proscriptive with Cruisers… London Naval Treaty of 1930 (Long Patrol)29:00Washington and London treaties were not equivalentNotable Point
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment2:29:03Why Nelson's third turret was not superfiringQ&A
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment2:44:09A treaty-compliant redesign of the Nagato classQ&A
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment3:31:42A fee-based alternative to Washington Treaty ship limitsQ&A
- All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)27:32Treaty tonnage and French capital-ship choicesChapter
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament20:28Dockyard improvements and treaty restrictionsQ&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament20:47Treaty limits make compact capital ships attractiveChapter
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament23:41The 16-inch ceiling and why Hood could be retainedNotable Point
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament25:56Why did Italy's allowance still account for Leonardo da Vinci?Q&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament44:35Were G3 and N3 bargaining tools at Washington?Q&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament1:19:57France's twelve-gun alternative and its fleet costNotable Point
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament1:26:07Dunkerque as a compact answer to treaty threatsChapter
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament1:34:00Could deleting Nelson's torpedoes fund more speed?Q&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament1:59:38British 9.2-inch cruiser proposals before the treaty limitQ&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament2:58:45Completed 18-inch ships would change treaty bargainingNotable Point
- Bruships 71: Hobbs on the Fleet Air Arm in Europe & Other cool books24:14How Canadian battlecruisers could reshape Washington Treaty tiersQ&A
- Bruships 71: Hobbs on the Fleet Air Arm in Europe & Other cool books1:32:32Why Washington counted battlecruisers with battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships 71: Hobbs on the Fleet Air Arm in Europe & Other cool books2:01:28A Washington Treaty that forced every capital ship to be rebuiltQ&A
- Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney (Long Patrol)27:31Repulse beyond the loss of Force ZNotable Point
- Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney (Long Patrol)29:18Air power was anticipated, but its timetable was uncertainNotable Point
- Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney (Long Patrol)30:13Why treaty gun ceilings become design targetsChapter
- Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney (Long Patrol)33:12Four older battleships for two Nelson-class shipsNotable Point
- Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney (Long Patrol)34:55Treaty horse-trading and shipyard continuityNotable Point
- Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney (Long Patrol)38:41How the treaty defined capital ships and displacementNotable Point
- Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney (Long Patrol)45:57Nelson's flagship prestige and design compromiseChapter
- Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney (Long Patrol)55:52Trading older ships for five fast battleshipsNotable Point
- Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney2:32:05The Washington Treaty made Nelson and Rodney a pairChapter
- Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney2:40:46The Washington Treaty regulated replacements and rebuildsNotable Point
- Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney2:44:21What standard displacement meant under the treatyNotable Point
- Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney3:37:22Q&A: why choose 16-inch guns despite logistics?Q&A
- British Industry: The More than Just Ships P3/4: Maintaining (Royal Navy Dockyards II)10:28Worldwide basing versus larger warshipsChapter
- British Industry: The More than Just Ships P3/4: Maintaining (Royal Navy Dockyards II)40:00Dock capacity shapes cruiser force structureNotable Point
- Some Sunday Naval Books28:10Treaty-era modernisation of capital shipsNotable Point
- Some Sunday Naval Books36:37How treaty limits changed British strategyChapter
- Lord Charles Beresford (on his birthday)2:54:19The Washington Treaty as a mixed British bargainQ&A
- Bruships 69: The Decider1:21:27No Jutland would reinforce battleships, not discredit themQ&A
- Bruships 69: The Decider1:31:13Capital ships without treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 69: The Decider2:10:15Changing carrier limits mattered more than closing loopholesQ&A
- Bruships 68: Random Naval History Books & Questions4:28Would 16-inch guns have changed Hood's treaty position?Q&A
- Bruships 68: Random Naval History Books & Questions2:00:25A Washington Treaty with separate battlecruiser quotasQ&A
- Bruships 68: Random Naval History Books & Questions2:40:00Why armored cruisers inherited a poor reputationNotable Point
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru1:54:35How naval treaties might have increased the risk of warQ&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru2:38:50Which two extra capital ships Britain would retain at WashingtonQ&A
- The Principles and Factors of Cruiser Design(Live)3:06:38What if naval treaties had allowed true heavy cruisers?Chapter
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (10)23:44Could Britain have waited out the American naval programme?Q&A
- Question Time: Answering Knight6831's Questions (Long Patrol)1:55Could Britain have kept pace before Washington?Q&A
- Quirky Classes and What they tell us about their navies… (Live)2:53:23A year of cruiser historyNotable Point
- County Cruisers P2: The Kent Class Continued1:15Why the Counties were not simply ‘heavy cruisers’Chapter
- County Cruisers P1: The Kent Class (Long Patrol)1:39Hawkins class and the cruiser limitsChapter
- County Cruisers P1: The Kent Class (Long Patrol)11:43Washington Treaty rules beyond 10,000 tonsChapter
- County Cruisers P1: The Kent Class (Long Patrol)14:33How treaty rules constrained British naval practiceNotable Point
- County Cruisers P1: The Kent Class (Long Patrol)31:50Why arms-control bargains needed political winsNotable Point
- County Cruisers P1: The Kent Class (Long Patrol)40:52Why the Counties still look like large light cruisersNotable Point
- Youtube Vote 1: The 1905-1906 and the 1911 Morocco Crises26:46How giant Hood successors might change naval treatiesQ&A
- Youtube Vote 1: The 1905-1906 and the 1911 Morocco Crises1:05:00Why a different war produces a different naval treatyQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)29:41Dominion navies would choose treaty-disposal ships differentlyQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)2:16:20The unfinished 1920 South Dakotas were slow but overwhelmingNotable Point
- Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...1:26:36Why a pre-Washington bonus ship would not be a third NelsonQ&A
- Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...1:57:50A treaty-era role for new armoured cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...2:09:23War Plan Red and the problem of fighting Britain at seaQ&A
- Bruships 63: The Writing Theorists - Corbett & Mahan, Richmond & Simms, Cable & Gorshkhov2:43:13A possible Royal Navy 12-inch heavy cruiserNotable Point
- Inspiration of Theorists: The Maritime & Strategic Lessons of the Seven Years War (1756-63)2:17:31Q&A: extra Admirals at the Washington conferenceQ&A
- Inspiration of Theorists: The Maritime & Strategic Lessons of the Seven Years War (1756-63)2:20:21Q&A: fiscal choices shaped the Washington settlementQ&A
- Patreon 36: Repair Ships, Depot Ships, Tenders and Stores Ships...1:01:07Treaty limits and USS MedusaChapter
- Bruships 60: Covid Jab, Bad Back & New Books1:02:22Treaty alternatives for Lexington, G3, and AmagiQ&A
- 21 Christmas Books for 2021 - Bruships 59: Books & Naval History Chat1:16:48An 18-inch-gun Queen Elizabeth fleetQ&A
- 21 Christmas Books for 2021 - Bruships 59: Books & Naval History Chat2:12:40If Australia and New Zealand retained battlecruisersQ&A
- Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat19:42Destroyers without treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat37:34Why three Lexington battlecruisers would unravel the treaty balanceQ&A
- Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat43:03A treaty-limit Ranger and better-protected YorktownsQ&A
- Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat55:21A tonnage-limited treaty fleetQ&A
- Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat1:11:56Why Nelson and Rodney suffer from unfair comparisonsQ&A
- Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat2:16:49What happens to the Courageous hulls if the Admirals become carriersQ&A
- Patreon 37: Interwar RN logistics - The Good, The Bad, and The Singapore2:25:09Article 19 limited Pacific basesChapter
- Patreon 37: Interwar RN logistics - The Good, The Bad, and The Singapore2:31:44Without Article 19, bases join the arms raceQ&A
- Patreon 37: Interwar RN logistics - The Good, The Bad, and The Singapore2:32:39Naval treaties relied on mutual restraintQ&A
- Interwar RN logistics - The Good, The Bad, and The Singapore: Long Patrol33:06Washington Treaty limits on Pacific base defencesChapter
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (7)53:01Britain used 14-inch guns as a treaty signalQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (7)1:26:22Could fleet-age limits replace the treaty construction holiday?Q&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…37:11What Commonwealth Queen Elizabeths would changeQ&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…2:12:29What a later Washington Naval Treaty might have changedQ&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…2:16:18Did the Washington treaty avert an Anglo-American war?Q&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…3:00:47Was Nelson's all-forward gun arrangement worth it?Q&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...10:47Borodinos could pull the Soviet Union into treaty talksNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...23:06Borodinos complicate Japan's treaty calculationQ&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...33:13Commonwealth capital ships challenge treaty arithmeticQ&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...51:25Public donations made Mutsu hard to sacrificeQ&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...1:10:36Why an 18-inch ship could escalate the capital-ship raceNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...1:41:18Why Incomparable would disrupt WashingtonQ&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...1:43:00Why faster British battleships would not change treaty ratiosQ&A
- Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)1:05:54How Canadian battleships could have complicated WashingtonNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)1:39:57Why Britain scrapped 12-inch dreadnoughts after the warQ&A
- Patreon 34: Inter-war Naval Aircraft Development - what could have been?20:50Treaties shaped the carrier fleet that emergedChapter
- Patreon 34: Inter-war Naval Aircraft Development - what could have been?28:59Why carrier limits emerged through successive naval treatiesQ&A
- Chiefs of Staff of the Axis Navies – Comment Response 2/435:15Why treaty limits looked like second-tier status to JapanNotable Point
- Patreon 33: Amphibious ship development from 1980's to modern day.4:01:32The Washington treaty contained the next naval raceQ&A
- Victims of the Kantai Kessen: Japanese Cruisers of the 1920s & 1930s (Long Patrol / Patreon 32)11:22One-, two-, and five-ocean fleet allowancesNotable Point
- Victims of the Kantai Kessen: Japanese Cruisers of the 1920s & 1930s (Long Patrol / Patreon 32)36:37Naval treaties and tolerated evasionNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (6)39:40Hood and the possibility of 18-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (6)3:16:43The treaty allowed US parity that the Senate did not fundQ&A
- Shipbuilding through the 1880s-1950s3:08:53If naval treaties had abolished submarinesQ&A
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 7/11 The Roaring Twenties0:40Treaty limits and the Nelson-class choiceChapter
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 7/11 The Roaring Twenties9:06The Washington Treaty bargain and American parityNotable Point
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 7/11 The Roaring Twenties11:33Nelson's all-forward turret layoutNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (5)1:12:56If every treaty navy received two replacement battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (4)42:27A larger treaty light cruiserQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (4)1:43:27Giving cruisers a battleship-sized treaty ceilingQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (4)2:08:04How naval treaty displacement limits were bentQ&A
- Patreon 31: Armoured Cruisers in the Mediterranean in WWI1:01:08Industrial capacity was part of naval strategyNotable Point
- Patreon 31: Armoured Cruisers in the Mediterranean in WWI2:00:11Why the armoured cruiser did not become the heavy cruiserChapter
- Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWII) – The Comment Questions43:08Light-carrier work and treaty carrier categoriesNotable Point
- Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWII) – The Comment Questions49:01Depression, naval treaties, and shipbuilding capacityNotable Point
- A Book or Two to Review (5): Italian Battleships - Conte di Cavour & Duilio Classes 1911-19567:27Free-tonnage battlecruiser alternativeNotable Point
- Bruships 50: A D-Day special with Questions & some New Books from Pen & Sword24:00How Britain might have built warships without the Washington treatyQ&A
- Some More Battle Cruisers51:18Battlecruiser hulls made natural treaty-era carrier conversionsNotable Point
- Bruships 44: Strategy1:16:24A counterfactual chain from Beatty's carrier policy to PQ 17Q&A
- Bruships 44: Strategy1:36:54Roskill's sea-power history frames the uneasy interwar settlementChapter
- Bruships 44: Strategy1:39:48Treaty limits created design problems and encouraged workaroundsNotable Point
- Bruships 44: Strategy2:34:02Intelligence managed Anglo-American naval rivalry after 1918Chapter
- Bruships 44: Strategy2:53:40Naval treaties enabled change without planning British successionQ&A
- Patreon 19: 2nd Tier powers Dreadnoughts: Spain, Austria-Hungary, S.America, Greece & Ottomans1:02:27España and the 10,000-ton cruiser limitChapter
- Patreon 19: 2nd Tier powers Dreadnoughts: Spain, Austria-Hungary, S.America, Greece & Ottomans1:14:16When a 17,500-ton cruiser becomes a small battleshipChapter
- Patreon 19: 2nd Tier powers Dreadnoughts: Spain, Austria-Hungary, S.America, Greece & Ottomans3:20:43Designing an Irish coastal-defense battleshipQ&A
- Crown Colony Class Long Patrol: Part 4 Ceylon to Newfoundland52:50Why criticize the 1936 naval treaty but not earlier arms limits?Q&A
- Bruships 40: Favourite Books to Use When Writing...3:53:34Would a world without the interwar naval treaties avoid war?Q&A
- Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects1:57:56Could Nelson have become a fast six-gun battlecruiser?Q&A
- Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects3:06:40If Hood's sisters had survived, what becomes of Nelson?Q&A
- The Battles of Dogger Bank 1696-19163:19:38Beatty's mixed interwar policy legacyNotable Point
- Counter Piracy in China in 1920s & 1930s: Long Patrol Part 125:50Treaties, aviation assistance, and battlecruiser visits shaped Far Eastern signallingChapter
- Patreon 16: Royal Navy anti-piracy operations of the 1920s & 1930s in the Far East48:50The Washington treaty, forward bases, and naval visitsChapter
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response2:18Could Britain afford the G3 and N3 programmes?Q&A
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response6:34Treaty tonnage rules and Britain's need for hull numbersNotable Point
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response9:24G3 conversions and a larger treaty carrier normNotable Point
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response15:35Japan's carrier options after the Amagi lossQ&A
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response21:30Postwar peace optimism and premature cancellationNotable Point
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response32:46Books for studying interwar treaty warshipsQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes23:31Why Britain wanted more carrier tonnage but smaller individual carriersNotable Point
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes46:53The G3 orders halted by the Washington negotiationsChapter
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:37:13Why the Revenge class survived while the G3s disappearedQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:49:28Surviving G3s could have raised the treaty battleship ceilingNotable Point
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes2:02:24The N3's 18-inch guns and the escalation trapChapter
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes2:29:46Could treaty construction quotas have preserved shipyard employment?Q&A
- Bruships 32: Ships & Space Ships (Reality & Scifi)2:53:51Ark Royal and the move to a mature purpose-built carrierChapter
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 2: Papers & Treaties6:55How treaty quotas shaped early carrier fleetsChapter
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 2: Papers & Treaties9:25Why Britain studied 22,000-ton carriersQ&A
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 2: Papers & Treaties30:46Carrier treaties closed tonnage and armament loopholesChapter
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s1:37:22How naval treaties shaped interwar carrier fleetsChapter
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s2:35:25Why the G3 battlecruisers were not converted into carriersQ&A
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s3:17:14Treaty carrier tonnage reflected a sea change already underwayQ&A
- For Random Books 18: Freidman's Royal Navy13:20Carrier treaty limits collided with fleet availabilityNotable Point
- Bruships30: Nine Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects(Including 1939) & Three New Books1:53:53Nelson and Rodney under Washington Treaty limitsChapter
- Bruships30: Nine Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects(Including 1939) & Three New Books2:16:41Treaty definitions, carrier tonnage, and experimental replacementChapter
- Bruships30: Nine Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects(Including 1939) & Three New Books2:43:17How cruiser growth reduced reconnaissance valueChapter
- Bruships30: Nine Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects(Including 1939) & Three New Books3:16:02Reading recommendations for interwar carrier historyQ&A
- Steel of a Hundred Years Ago: Ships of 19201:25:17How British conversions shaped carrier treaty limitsQ&A
- RN Paper Cruisers; the what might have beens…1:12:24Naval treaty ratios carried political and cultural costsNotable Point
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 5 of 5/Articles 17-2239:42Why aircraft carriers stayed outside the debateChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 2 of 5/Articles 8-1021:58A counterfactual early Japanese-American warNotable Point
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 1 of 5/Articles 1-710:45Articles 3 and 4 define and arm small carriersChapter
- Bruships 23 - New Book Review1:42:54Warships after Washington as an interwar guideChapter
- Bruships 23 - New Book Review3:13:29Washington and London treaty bargainingQ&A
- Bruships 23 - New Book Review3:16:45French army strength and naval bargainingNotable Point
- Bruships 23 - New Book Review3:17:29France's security bargain at WashingtonQ&A
- Sloops of the Interwar a Long Patrol24:16What the Washington Treaty left openChapter
- The Leander Class Long Patrol - The Interwar 2nd Class Protected Cruiser?2:10Why a global navy needed more than one cruiser typeChapter
- Patreon Video 4: Tsingtao 1939 Goes Hot...1:33:13Industrial limits matter more than treaty limitsQ&A
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P1 Introduction to Patreon Video 421:53The dash from Weihaiwei to TsingtaoNotable Point
- P2 Introduction to Pre-Tribal Class Destroyers of the RN12:03H-class growth and treaty reportingChapter
- P2 Introduction to Pre-Tribal Class Destroyers of the RN12:46Article 17 protected foreign warship ordersNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 11: Top Trumps/Ship Comparison Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:25:19The cost of inheriting German warships after the First World WarQ&A
- Patreon Video 1: What would you put in warehouses at the end of WWI for WWII if you could?5:45Setting realistic limits for an interwar reserveChapter
- Patreon Video 1: What would you put in warehouses at the end of WWI for WWII if you could?16:00Using coast-guard service to preserve destroyer capacityQ&A
- Patreon Video 1: What would you put in warehouses at the end of WWI for WWII if you could?22:20A Commonwealth coast-guard fleet as prewar capacityQ&A
- Patreon Video 1: What would you put in warehouses at the end of WWI for WWII if you could?28:15Growing a seaplane force incrementallyQ&A
- Patreon Video 1: What would you put in warehouses at the end of WWI for WWII if you could?45:15A treaty ceiling can also become a naval budget floorNotable Point
- Patreon Video 1: What would you put in warehouses at the end of WWI for WWII if you could?1:14:48The V and W destroyers' second life as escortsQ&A
- Patreon Video 1: Intro - What would you put in warehouses at the end of WWI for WWII if you could?0:03Planning postwar reserves within treaty limitsChapter
- Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy43:21Why Britain retained battlecruisers after JutlandNotable Point
- Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy1:03:56Why wartime acquisitions multiplied Royal Navy gun typesQ&A
- An Introduction To Battle Cruisers8:18Global trade routes and Washington Treaty constraintsChapter
- An Introduction To Battle Cruisers10:23Treaty schedules gave battlecruisers short planned livesNotable Point
- An Introduction To Battle Cruisers11:03How treaty wording shaped refits and reconstructionNotable Point
- An Introduction To Battle Cruisers13:51Reconstruction could remake an old warshipNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 2b: Book Reviews/Q&A12:20What a treaty ban on submarines would changeQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 2a: Book Reviews/Q&A59:31Why a modern Washington Naval Treaty would struggleQ&A
- The RN in 1939, more than just a Question of Geography - A Quarterdeck Talk (26/11/2019)21:37Naval treaties, total tonnage, and the division of fleet rolesNotable Point
- Back Pocket Cruisers Presentation (Practice 2)9:12Treaty limits made ship numbers the central problemChapter