Q&A ยท 1:43:00-1:43:29

Why faster British battleships would not change treaty ratios

British negotiators centered treaty comparisons on battle-fleet firepower rather than speed, limiting Japanese arguments for completing Tosa and Amagi.

Question

Could faster British battleships justify Japanese completion of Tosa and Amagi under a treaty?

Short answer

Probably not, because the negotiations were framed around battle-fleet firepower rather than speed.

Notes

Faster Queen Elizabeth and R-class ships would improve British operational capability without directly increasing their counted gun power. Britain deliberately framed the negotiations around firepower rather than battle-line speed. That choice denied Japan and the United States an easy claim that faster British ships justified more new construction. Arms-control arithmetic can privilege selected measures while leaving important combat qualities outside the headline ratio.