Q&A · 1:57:50-1:59:44

A treaty-era role for new armoured cruisers

A counterfactual treaty category produces armoured cruisers suited to station flagships and carrier escort duty.

Question

How might the Royal Navy have used armoured cruisers if the Washington Naval Treaty had allowed a separate category?

Short answer

As station flagships and carrier escorts, probably armed with guns around 9.2 to ten inches.

Notes

If the Washington system had permitted a new armoured-cruiser allowance, the Royal Navy would probably use the ships as overseas flagships and heavy carrier escorts. A plausible gun hierarchy would give light cruisers six-inch weapons, heavy cruisers eight-inch weapons, and armoured cruisers perhaps 9.2- to ten-inch guns. Treaty definitions would shape the ships' missions as well as weapon development. The category could therefore restore a large station cruiser without classifying it as a capital ship.