Related time notes
- The Gowind Class: Flexible Warships for Changing Threats6:30Matching armament to piracy and disputed watersNotable Point
- The Gowind Class: Flexible Warships for Changing Threats7:11Guns, warning shots and diplomatic signalingNotable Point
- Bruships 264: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:04:06What limits the number of secondary guns on a warship?Q&A
- The Big Frigate Discussion: ASWFs, F110s & Pohjanmaas vs Gowind, European Patrol Corvette & FF(X)12:18ASWF self-defence, missile depth, and drone threatsNotable Point
- The Big Frigate Discussion: ASWFs, F110s & Pohjanmaas vs Gowind, European Patrol Corvette & FF(X)17:15F110's 127 mm gun and the missing companion weaponNotable Point
- The Big Frigate Discussion: ASWFs, F110s & Pohjanmaas vs Gowind, European Patrol Corvette & FF(X)1:03:55Naval guns as visible diplomatic signalsNotable Point
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:50:53Where Hood's turrets could have goneQ&A
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:51:32Keeping equipment from treaty-scrapped battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:17:22Modernised 4.7-inch and 155 mm destroyer gunsQ&A
- Momi to Kagero - The Story of the Japanese 1920s & 1930s Destroyer Program43:07Fubuki brings longer range and heavier gunsChapter
- Momi to Kagero - The Story of the Japanese 1920s & 1930s Destroyer Program44:18The cost of changing destroyer gun caliberNotable Point
- Momi to Kagero - The Story of the Japanese 1920s & 1930s Destroyer Program57:47Hatsuharu's gun layout and topweightNotable Point
- Momi to Kagero - The Story of the Japanese 1920s & 1930s Destroyer Program1:18:38Shiratsuyu's fifth gun and the torpedo approachNotable Point
- Momi to Kagero - The Story of the Japanese 1920s & 1930s Destroyer Program1:25:44Asashio's aft guns and the danger of withdrawalChapter
- Momi to Kagero - The Story of the Japanese 1920s & 1930s Destroyer Program1:31:19Why six guns on a larger Asashio?Notable Point
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:04:34Vertical sliding breeches and turret spaceQ&A
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:25:59Assessing claims that Turkish naval guns are copiesNotable Point
- Key Frigates of Today & Tomorrow 2: T54, Istanbul & Gorshkov vs Thaon di Revel, Tamandare & Chungnam18:54Istanbul's 76 mm gun and close-in defensesNotable Point
- Key Frigates of Today & Tomorrow 2: T54, Istanbul & Gorshkov vs Thaon di Revel, Tamandare & Chungnam1:02:16The PPA's 127 mm gun and Vulcano ammunitionNotable Point
- Key Frigates of Today & Tomorrow 2: T54, Istanbul & Gorshkov vs Thaon di Revel, Tamandare & Chungnam1:07:54Tamandare's combat fit and CAMM magazineNotable Point
- Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail?1:31:32What the Replicators suggest about near-term drone defenceQ&A
- 14 Acts and 7 Classes - the story of the USN Interwar Destroyers22:19Farragut paired greater range with British-derived machineryNotable Point
- 14 Acts and 7 Classes - the story of the USN Interwar Destroyers1:27:35Somers combined leader firepower with long-range flexibilityChapter
- 14 Acts and 7 Classes - the story of the USN Interwar Destroyers1:27:59Somers concentrated twelve torpedoes in one salvoNotable Point
- Key Frigates of Today & Tomorrow: Type 26s, FREMMs & Nilgiris vs Mogami, Type 31s & FDIs22:29FREMM weapon layers, firing arcs, and redundancyNotable Point
- Key Frigates of Today & Tomorrow: Type 26s, FREMMs & Nilgiris vs Mogami, Type 31s & FDIs1:10:13FDI gun fits, order totals, and French program costChapter
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:04:00Modern Alaska hulls in an age of cheap dronesQ&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:12:01Gun-fit choices for the Royal Navy's CCVQ&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:50:34Why Italy adopted numerous autocannon earlyQ&A
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...35:05How a longer Type 45 run might have evolvedQ&A
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...45:04Why a drone rush needs more than numbersQ&A
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...48:44A fictional three-gun ship limited by barrel lifeQ&A
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:05:35How a gun-heavy cruiser might fare in CongressQ&A
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:28:04What Italy's DDX suggests about a future cruiserNotable Point
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:31:01Why four 76 mm guns are not simple overkillQ&A
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:33:57Could a 3-inch shell threaten a modern submarine?Q&A
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:40:34Gun variants in an enormous Type 45 production runQ&A
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:46:30Why extra gun mounts matter far from a repair baseNotable Point
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:01:28Why visible guns still matter for naval deterrenceNotable Point
- Balancing the Humors: How are modern nations balancing diplomacy and war in the ships they build?1:38:12Could Japan build modern ships around existing heavy turrets?Q&A
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 240:24Should the Type 26 and Type 31 swap main guns?Q&A
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 242:20Would an 18-inch gun make a useful anti-submarine mortar?Q&A
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 244:46Naval guns as reusable multi-purpose launchersNotable Point
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 246:21The case for another look at 6-inch naval gunsNotable Point
- The Perils of Standardisation: Can Navy's Standardise too much? (Patreon Premier)1:39Royal Navy gun standardization created more variationChapter
- The Perils of Standardisation: Can Navy's Standardise too much? (Patreon Premier)2:12Why one gun calibre did not guarantee one fleet standardNotable Point
- The Perils of Standardisation: Can Navy's Standardise too much? (Patreon Premier)6:46How a 12-pounder became a de facto standardNotable Point
- Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:44:21Britain's 16.5-inch gun as the next design stepQ&A
- The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?3:53:58DragonFire and 76 mm guns may erode the cheap-drone advantageQ&A
- The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?4:05:37Warships need counter-drone engagements farther from their sensorsQ&A
- Bruships 244: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:33:07Designing a River-class OPV successorQ&A
- Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...18:04Exquisite weapons, fleet numbers, and layered defenceQ&A
- Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...24:00Gun coverage, drone swarms, and laser supportNotable Point
- Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:25:59Missiles ashore and guns offshoreQ&A
- Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:14:58USVs, the Jeune École, and rapid-firing defencesQ&A
- Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:18:18USV autonomy, communications, and the cost of controlQ&A
- Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:21:14Why fibre-optic drone control becomes harder at seaQ&A
- Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:32:03How swarm size changes a ship's gun-defence problemQ&A
- Why do Modern Warships just keep getting bigger?38:23Recurring threat panics and counters left ashoreChapter
- Why do Modern Warships just keep getting bigger?42:31Gun magazines and the limits of lasersChapter
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:10:49Future roles for 40 mm and 57 mm guns in the Royal NavyQ&A
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:05:54USS Norfolk's combat battery and peacetime limitationsQ&A
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:12:20Britain can design guns it struggles to manufactureQ&A
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:07:44Why an N3 follow-on would not simply add twelve 16.5-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:52:08An ice-rated Canadian large surface combatantQ&A
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:01:58Heavy radar-directed guns against dronesQ&A
- What if the Royal Navy's Aircraft Carrier HMS Hermes had sisters in the 1920s? (Patreon Live)1:55:55What would the Royal Navy do with a Lexington-class carrier?Q&A
- Top/Bottom 5 inventions/adaptations of RN ships that came from the ships themselves...(Patreon Live)57:26The feasible Dreadnought Britain did not buildNotable Point
- Top/Bottom 5 inventions/adaptations of RN ships that came from the ships themselves...(Patreon Live)1:23:51What 13.5-inch guns would have changed for DreadnoughtQ&A
- Top/Bottom 5 inventions/adaptations of RN ships that came from the ships themselves...(Patreon Live)1:29:22The dual-purpose gun the Tribal class neededQ&A
- Bruships 233: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:20:04Bringing HMS Agincourt into the presentQ&A
- Bruships 233: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:27:55Royal Navy dual-purpose guns and the Dido roleQ&A
- Bruships 233: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:31:02What automatic 5.25-inch guns could have changedQ&A
- Bruships 233: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:31:42Why British and American automatic cruiser guns developed differentlyNotable Point
- Bruships 233: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:43:55A 1960s gun cruiser evolved for modern serviceQ&A
- Bruships 233: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:44:27Gun and CIWS weight in proportion to the shipNotable Point
- The Reality of Soviet Naval Presence in the Cold War: Destroyers are the Fleet52:32Sovremenny spends displacement on flexibilityChapter
- The Reality of Soviet Naval Presence in the Cold War: Destroyers are the Fleet1:25:12Udaloy II points toward converging destroyer designsNotable Point
- The rise and fall of Constellation class Frigate program? (Patreon Live)3:33:30A proposed armament for a new frigateQ&A
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?21:22Cruiser turrets shared with coastal batteriesNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?27:41Using gun liners to preserve a larger wartime calibreChapter
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 202640:58Gun positions help distinguish a destroyer from a torpedo boatNotable Point
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 202650:33Were superfiring guns already appearing on these destroyers?Q&A
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 20261:19:52Tribal gun power supported torpedo-heavy flotilla partnersChapter
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 20261:36:47Why exposed guns and missiles can look more threateningQ&A
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 20262:13:39Italian DDX pairs power generation with overlapping gun defensesNotable Point
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 20262:18:05Lasers belong inside layered gun and missile defensesNotable Point
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 20262:41:54A proposed Type 45 fit combines 96 missile cells and two MerlinsNotable Point
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 20262:51:07What would bring twin gun mounts back to destroyers?Q&A
- Bruships 227: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:35:15The railgun recoil debateQ&A
- Bruships 227: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:42:40Railgun projectile shielding and the case for larger shellsQ&A
- Bruships 227: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:44:25Questioning the claim that rain detonated battleship shellsQ&A
- Bruships 227: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:46:10Choosing railgun calibre around mass and loadingQ&A
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...47:08What Vickers could sell the major navies in 1935Q&A
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:07:40Why HMS Vanguard kept sextuple Bofors mountsQ&A
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:09:14Classifying a 9,200-ton gun-heavy frigateQ&A
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:30:43Arming a nuclear-powered icebreakerQ&A
- Why is a Frigate a Frigate and other questions of modern navys?58:55Railguns could drive another round of escort growthChapter
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)30:22Missile doctrine and the return of naval gunfireChapter
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)40:21Measure defensive expenditure against the ship protectedNotable Point
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)52:53Can long-range guided shells return to warships?Q&A
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)2:37:35Six-inch guns occupy a useful naval firepower tierQ&A
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)2:43:14Off-the-shelf guns constrain a large combatantQ&A
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)3:03:05The 40 mm Bofors has already returnedQ&A
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)3:06:41Drone threats and the gun defences actually fittedQ&A
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)3:14:21Fixed VLS loads strengthen the case for naval gunsQ&A
- Future Fleets: Some Ideas of Naval Warfare38:15Counter-drone guns and jammers in the Strait of HormuzChapter
- Future Fleets: Some Ideas of Naval Warfare57:05Defence marketing rewards new wonder-weapon narrativesNotable Point
- Trumps Battleship; A Naval History view on what we know of the Defiant Class so far44:01Why visible guns matter in a diplomatic visitNotable Point
- What the Frigates up with our Frigates? A Bilgepumps Christmas 2025 @Drachinifel& @wgowshipping29:48Zumwalt's hull survived its failed mission systemsChapter
- What the Frigates up with our Frigates? A Bilgepumps Christmas 2025 @Drachinifel& @wgowshipping31:16Guided-shell commonality can matter more than matching the gunNotable Point
- What the Frigates up with our Frigates? A Bilgepumps Christmas 2025 @Drachinifel& @wgowshipping2:03:59Heavier frigate guns required suitable hullsNotable Point
- Bruships 223: Naval History & Science Fiction Questions Answered Live...3:52:00Choosing a battlecruiser's gun caliberQ&A
- Bruships 223: Naval History & Science Fiction Questions Answered Live...4:36:25Would Britain revive a 9.2-inch cruiser?Q&A
- Exploring the meme: Top 5 & Bottom 5 inventions/systems of war that started in British Sheds(Live)24:55A light railway for hypothetical 22-inch battleship shellsNotable Point
- Exploring the meme: Top 5 & Bottom 5 inventions/systems of war that started in British Sheds(Live)2:05:33What is the naval equivalent of the Sten gun?Q&A
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...56:09Why a smaller railgun programme could be easier to deliverQ&A
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:00:31Why Zumwalt could not use Army 155 mm shellsQ&A
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:02:15Vulcano ammunition, production volume and a Type 26 preferenceQ&A
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:14:01Why railguns are unlikely to revive nuclear shellsQ&A
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:36:22Could Green Mace have become a naval anti-aircraft gun?Q&A
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:43:21Battleship ramming and the symbolic appeal of large gunsQ&A
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:53:23Rebuilding large naval guns from an 8-inch starting pointQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon5:51:42A River-class OPV as a practical modern gunboat baseQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon5:58:54Why navies separate missiles from gun barrelsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress6:22:26How a surviving Bayern could change Scharnhorst's armamentQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II2:19:56Why Britain did not standardize on a four-inch dual-purpose gunQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II9:25:21Secondary guns and torpedoes for an American Super TigerQ&A
- Bruships 217: Back from Japan 2025: Jetlag is a Myth - Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:04:04Classifying a modern 12-inch-gun missile shipQ&A
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?16:24A 15-inch compromise and faster carriersNotable Point
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?41:03The modified F3 as a treaty battlecruiserChapter
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?48:02Continued building advances British gunneryNotable Point
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?57:19Washington and the Lexingtons in the American compromiseChapter
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?1:00:00Lexington gun caliber trades range for protectionNotable Point
- Bruships 215 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...37:53Assessing the Russian AK-176 gunQ&A
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age4:43Daring class as the peak Royal Navy gun destroyerChapter
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age26:24Escort cruisers created a need for large destroyer leadersChapter
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age1:05:06Daring and County armament exposes Type 82's redundancy gapNotable Point
- Building Ships Out of Time; or Why sometimes nations seem to build last generation ships39:58Why modern warships retain deck guns alongside missilesChapter
- Bruships 213 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...35:35Starting the dreadnought race with 14-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 213 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:38:51Why the OTO Melara 76 mm fits almost any warshipQ&A
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...After Power Cut1:57:01Naval turret machinery repurposed for space antennasQ&A
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...After Power Cut2:21:50A heavily armed modern destroyer conceptQ&A
- Maya Class: The Ultimate Arleigh Burke Flight IIA or something else?30:43Propulsion efficiency and a gray-zone gun debateNotable Point
- Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:17:22The unrealized promise of Japan's Type 5 127 mm gunQ&A
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why0:00Why destroyer-gun choices reveal doctrineChapter
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why12:10Why the Royal Navy fielded so many 4-inch gunsChapter
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why38:30The 4.7-inch gun and British destroyer tacticsChapter
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why52:58How Ansaldo and OTO competed over Italy's 120 mm gunsNotable Point
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why56:23Italy's 120 mm choice: velocity over rate of fireChapter
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why1:07:49Why the 5-inch/38 needed a new barrel designNotable Point
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why1:20:26Japan's 127 mm guns and attrition doctrineChapter
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why1:24:24Why elevation alone did not make Japan's 127 mm gun effectiveNotable Point
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why1:29:16French 130 mm guns and the first-hit philosophyChapter
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why1:33:44Why France's 138.6 mm destroyer gun underdeliveredChapter
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why1:38:34Germany's 150 mm destroyers as a failed cruiser shortcutChapter
- Bruships 207: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:48:57Panzerschiffe armed with 12-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 207: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:52:18A 12,000-ton treaty cruiser with 9.2-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 207: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:28:39Italy builds a sixteen-gun super-battleshipQ&A
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?29:03Private firms kept alternative heavy-gun programs aliveChapter
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?31:52Fisher's Incomparable and speculative 20-inch gunsChapter
- Procurement for Peace: Second Draft2:15Why warships are conflict-management toolsChapter
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:55:18Could Lexington battlecruisers counter British 9.2-inch cruisers?Notable Point
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:49:32A South American cruiser race instead of dreadnoughtsQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:00:46The US Navy adopts the pom-pomQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:05:05Kirov-class cruisers with six-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:39:25German armored cruisers retain 9.4-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:59:47Royal Navy cruisers designed for rapid upgunningQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:13:22Oto Melara unveils an automatic 381 mm gunQ&A
- Lessons of Falklands War(1982) and Ukraine War(2022-)38:32The Falklands restored the case for naval gunsChapter
- Lessons of Falklands War(1982) and Ukraine War(2022-)38:32New weapons repeatedly fail to make artillery obsoleteNotable Point
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:16:12How battleship guns might be designed todayQ&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:27:40Independent targeting versus twin-turret redundancyQ&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:50:40Why a future naval gun may jump from five to six inchesQ&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:52:05Why tank mobility limits gun-barrel lengthNotable Point
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?3:05:45Why Palmers had less control over shipbuilding costsNotable Point
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?3:10:26What would later naval treaties regulate?Q&A
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?3:16:21Could treaties give battlecruisers their own category?Q&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...43:26If the US Navy jumped from twelve- to fifteen-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...45:14How a 16.5-inch gun could change the Queen Elizabeth designNotable Point
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:59:52Largest calibre in a quintuple gun mountQ&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:58:02An Australian naval-gun factory before World War IIQ&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:25:13An Italian-style reconstruction of HMS WarspiteQ&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:43:46Modern and World War II five-inch naval guns comparedQ&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:45:30A postwar Royal Navy standardized on 5.25-inch gunsNotable Point
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:02:14Photographs of County-class guns at 70 degreesQ&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:29:26A modern gun-only Atlanta-style AA cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...11:22Why HMS Hood needed a unique secondary-armament reconstructionQ&A
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...29:57Can naval guns defeat uncrewed underwater vehicles?Q&A
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...41:12Why multi-barrel naval-gun concepts are returningNotable Point
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...45:42Why an HMS Hood refit could not simply add mixed mountsQ&A
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:23:21The case for arming the Nelson class with improved 15-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:45:04What an early 5-inch/54 gun would change in the wartime US NavyQ&A
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:50:46There is no single best modern naval gunQ&A
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...24:30Where cross-Channel and railway guns came fromQ&A
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:16:36Why future warships may carry more medium-calibre gunsQ&A
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:20:20Why four quadruple turrets make a poor battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:20:50Trading Alaska's 12-inch guns for torpedo defenceQ&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued14:12The Vickers salesman behind the 14-inch gunQ&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued18:57Why two British 5-inch gun projects were not direct successorsQ&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued30:35Vickers and Armstrong as one-stop arms suppliersQ&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:55:09Why the US Navy's 5.4-inch gun went nowhereQ&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:05:09What a US 5.4-inch gun would changeQ&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:11:06A British 5.5-inch dual-purpose gun pathNotable Point
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:19:17The hardest structural work in dry dockQ&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:59:00Why six 18-inch guns are a poor Iowa-class tradeQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 21st Century Battleship: Chat & Comment Response...48:42The stability concern with 16-inch submarine gunsQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 21st Century Battleship: Chat & Comment Response...57:40Why retain a 16-inch gun caliberQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 21st Century Battleship: Chat & Comment Response...58:19Protecting magazines below armorQ&A
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...44:57Are French and Italian frigates lightly armed?Q&A
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:55:34Why the Royal Navy adopted the 5-inch/62 gunQ&A
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:19:13A faster Nelson with 15-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:14:43Why the Royal Navy chose 14-inch guns for the King George V classQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:26:55What made the French battleship Hoche look capableQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:13:21Why twin 15-inch turrets cannot become triple 14-inch mountsQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:14:07Competing interpretations of Agincourt's proposed armamentNotable Point
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:20:16Choosing a useful naval railgun caliberQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:39:38Why 18-inch turrets would cripple a King George V refitQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:45:12Where battleship gun caliber reaches diminishing returnsQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:40:09When heavy guns make sense on a fictional carrierQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:43:46Colossus and Victoria: awkward capital-ship choicesQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:45:53A 13.5-inch route to DreadnoughtNotable Point
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:47:56Why Royal Navy gun calibers often rose by 1.5 inchesQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:15:37Octuple 16-inch turrets against massed missile attacksQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:22:17A 150,000-ton battleship can be built but may only be a showpieceQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:26:34An interrupted-thread breech belongs to the screw-breech familyQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:47:41When a 135 mm gun becomes point defenseQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:51:50Armstrong's claim to build a 21-inch gunQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?30:41Reading the fictional battleship in Indiana Jones and the Great CircleQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?33:09What a 1937 reconstruction of HMS Tiger might includeQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?38:18What the Royal Navy's 18-inch guns may implyQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?50:20Why the Oerlikon suited ships better than the HispanoQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?51:50A Queen Elizabeth with twenty 11-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?2:09:23Would Hood's 18-inch guns make the US 16-inch/45 obsolete?Q&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?3:08:33A rebuilt Tiger throws more broadside weight than RenownQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?3:38:19A prewar twin 6-inch cruiser turret was possible but unnecessaryQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?3:39:54When Japan would need a 20-inch YamatoQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?3:41:11Britain tested 20-inch guns but did not master productionQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?4:05:36Why the Admiral class stayed with 15-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?4:29:30Why the Royal Navy did not adopt triple turrets earlierQ&A
- Bruships 173: Christmas Books for the History Lover in your life...1:36:16A 14-inch North Carolina changes little in combatQ&A
- Bruships 173: Christmas Books for the History Lover in your life...1:54:23What the Spanish-American War taught naval designersQ&A
- Bruships 173: Christmas Books for the History Lover in your life...3:09:29Why Hoche overwhelms two Warrior-era ironcladsQ&A
- Bruships 173: Christmas Books for the History Lover in your life...4:25:40How US naval guns and shells compared in the First World WarQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!53:27A surface engagement with General BelgranoQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!55:02How a costly Belgrano gun action could change later warship armamentQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!2:02:27An 18-inch coastal gun at GibraltarQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!2:59:34Automatic loading could raise a 155 mm naval gun's rate of fireQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!3:00:53Trading 4.5-inch rate of fire for a heavier 155 mm shellQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!3:10:11Why the Royal Navy stayed with twin automatic turretsQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!3:41:29Why a 6.1-inch gun adoption could displace the 5-inch/62Q&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!4:05:36Strike drones could increase the number of close-in gunsQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!4:22:02Why replacing Ticonderoga's aft gun with VLS is not simpleQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!4:33:35A Second World War sloop turns Trafalgar into a standoff actionQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!10:40A Royal Navy 15-inch/50 upgrade programQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!37:19The Juneau class against kamikazes and early jetsQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!46:48Henderson's 15-inch/45 alternative for King George VQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!48:27How HMS Victoria's armored slipper could fightQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!51:09Why the Lion class did not need American 16-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!1:13:03The strategic case for nuclear-powered cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!1:37:17An Indefatigable class with the Lion gun layoutQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!1:56:35Why a six-gun diesel fast battleship is underarmedQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!1:59:56Warspite's X turret was secured rather than restoredQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!2:33:08What automated capital-ship loading meant before computersQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!2:34:30What Britain could build after abandoning treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!2:37:59Why future warship guns may return to 6-inch caliberQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!3:05:55Why postwar navies kept testing 6- and 8-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!3:49:32Why an 18-inch battery breaks the G3 designQ&A
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat45:26What quad 6-inch turrets would mean for BelfastQ&A
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat1:07:44An all-forward Lion would be a lateral design choiceQ&A
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat1:44:39Why telescoped ammunition has limited appeal for warshipsQ&A
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat1:47:49Using chronology to test claims about naval-gun developmentNotable Point
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat1:58:00A French capital-ship program without the Jeune École turnQ&A
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat2:20:25Why the Vanguard solution could not become a twelve-ship classQ&A
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat2:22:15Autoloading 15-inch turrets could change King George V-class manningQ&A
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat2:39:30German-Italian triple 15-inch turrets would accelerate a naval crisisQ&A
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat2:49:36The King George V class as a strong but compromised treaty battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat3:08:58A ready 16.5-inch gun could reshape the final King George V pairQ&A
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat3:24:26French naval guns were constrained by metallurgy and productionQ&A
- Twitch Live: USA Goes Battlecruiser for all their Capital Ships Campaign 326:05A torpedo boat is a weight-compromise problemChapter
- Bruships Gothenborg style...13:35Why the G3 battlecruiser was tied to a 16.5-inch gunQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 2: H Class Battleships, Japanese Carrier Aircraft Design and lots more1:02:20Larger gun bores and thinner linersQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 2: H Class Battleships, Japanese Carrier Aircraft Design and lots more1:04:29Proposed automatic loading and actual gun developmentQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 2: H Class Battleships, Japanese Carrier Aircraft Design and lots more1:05:05The domestic 11-inch gun choiceQ&A
- Patreon 101: If Lord Fisher died in Jan 1914, how does Prince Louis of Battenberg perform as 1SL?3:22:34Would 16.5-inch battleships still appear after an 18-inch Agincourt?Q&A
- Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London1:45:05North Carolina comes early while Britain chooses speed or gun sizeChapter
- Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London1:50:50A new 15-inch gun offers an alternative to Nelson's armamentNotable Point
- Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London1:57:15Would an early North Carolina keep 14-inch guns?Q&A
- Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London2:31:18Could Germany buy Italian 15-inch guns?Q&A
- Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London3:06:50Would Britain's earlier battleships use 14-inch, 15-inch, or 16-inch guns?Q&A
- HMS Ben My Chree(1908/1915): A Soaring Service with a Legacy of Fire Risk Managment23:05A fast steamer becomes a practical seaplane carrierChapter
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books6:24What armies borrowed from naval gunsQ&A
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books3:23:59When an OPV begins to look like a corvetteQ&A
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books4:16:05Why an army 155 mm gun is not a naval gunQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered13:27What a fourth battleship turret really costsQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered34:00Why an all-aft battleship battery is a poor signalQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered1:16:34Why removing County-class high elevation saves littleQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered1:30:04Why Hawkins carried 7.5-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered1:38:58Why Britain preferred more battleships to more guns per hullQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered1:43:13When an offshore patrol vessel becomes a corvetteQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered2:02:31What makes a twin 5-inch mount time-consumingQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered2:47:11Why HMS Andromeda needed her 4.5-inch gunQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered3:27:35Why adding medium guns to a carrier is costlyQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered3:33:32Martlet missiles as a wartime Type 23 growth pathNotable Point
- Imperial Russia Survives WWI: A Patreon Requested Alternate History47:11G3 construction raises the treaty ceilingChapter
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!1:52:20Plans alone could not restore German heavy-gun productionQ&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!2:53:18Shore batteries could exceed the 16.5-inch naval gun limitQ&A
- Check Campaign 6: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign6:36Why Crown Colony cruisers used triple turretsQ&A
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered4:42Germany's options against British 18-inch-gun capacityQ&A
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered16:38Italian dual-purpose gun choicesQ&A
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered1:27:07King George V armament without the 14-inch treaty limitQ&A
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered1:30:46How the US Navy might view 9.2-inch timed anti-aircraft fireQ&A
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered1:54:32American and Italian answers to British 9.2-inch treaty cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered1:59:31Why Leander lacked triple turrets but Arethusa could use themQ&A
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered2:23:30Britain's answer to 28-knot German battleshipsQ&A
- Check Campaign 4: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign37:25Why mixed AI gun batteries weaken fire controlNotable Point
- Check Campaign 4: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:16:23Researching an unwanted caliber to unlock better gunsNotable Point
- Check Campaign 4: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:17:04Standardizing older battleships around 28 knotsChapter
- Check Campaign 4: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:28:33Motor torpedo boat crews and improvised firepowerNotable Point
- Check Campaign 4: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:29:18Cruiser refits expose speed and armament tradeoffsChapter
- Check Campaign 4: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:34:31A twelve-gun Queen Elizabeth-class counterfactualNotable Point
- Check Campaign 4: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign3:24:06Designing the Bristol light cruiser to fill a fleet gapChapter
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered5:02What a 28,000-ton British battlecruiser specification impliedQ&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered1:14:58Trading triple turrets for larger twin-gun mountingsQ&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered1:33:45The industrial cost of German 14-inch gun retrofitsQ&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered1:38:41Balancing shell weight and muzzle velocityQ&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered2:24:13Why Italy rebored battleship guns when others did notQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!42:37A Royal Navy built around triple turretsQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:20:38The practical advantages of the 8-inch cruiser gunQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:20:54The most plausible later Lion-class battleshipQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:27:02Which navy gained most from T-gunsQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:54:18Why US pre-dreadnought gun calibers variedQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:01:32The minimum gun for naval shore bombardmentQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:15:35The practical upper limit for Hood's gunsQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:18:01Could Britain field the 15-inch gun earlier?Q&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:19:54Why a twelve-gun treaty cruiser breaks the design boxQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:48:27Why a post-Hawkins cruiser would use a 9.2-inch gunQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:48:51Choosing F3 for wider 15-inch fleet improvementsQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:54:00Longer gun barrels and propellant requirementsQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:06:02British choices for a larger destroyer gunQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:21:33What British gun choices reveal about postwar ambitionQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:47:28Why triple 6-inch turrets would dominate treaty cruisersQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:52:32Early turreted secondary batteriesQ&A
- Patreon 92: Frank Whittle is given consistent funding by Britain to develop jet engines from 19281:33:52Six parallel gun calibres expose a procurement problemNotable Point
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History16:36What counts as a naval autoloaderNotable Point
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History30:38Could a revolving naval-gun chamber seal safely?Q&A
- 'S' Class Submarines: The Royal Navy's All Rounders for WWII - Key Ship Series 7 Ship 724:54How displacement, crew, armament, and speed changed by groupChapter
- HMS Warspite: The Survivor - KSS3 S3 Comment Response23:50How many spare 15-inch guns might Vanguard have needed?Q&A
- Francesco Caracciolo: The Almost Next Battleship Era - KSS2 S6 Comment Response11:58Why the final Caracciolo design carried eight 15-inch gunsQ&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy2:05:34Why wartime seizures multiplied Royal Navy gun typesQ&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy2:44:12Why the Royal Navy fielded several medium gun calibersQ&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy3:00:27Could gun cruisers or battlecruisers return?Q&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy3:31:14Gun caliber does not locate a battlecruiser on the spectrumQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships1:03:52How twin six-inch Emeralds could accelerate cruiser turretsQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships1:10:42Cruiser categories without treaty tonnage ceilingsQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships1:28:53What an autoloading 14-inch broadside does to BismarckQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships1:29:59From Deutschland to Scharnhorst's longer 11-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships1:51:17Cooling a capital-ship autoloader between salvosQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships2:28:08Selecting ammunition in a capital-ship autoloaderQ&A
- WWII if Norway Wins & Operation Weserübung Fails...18:23Swedish iron ore becomes a contest Germany may loseChapter
- Bruships 125: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series1:10:50The condition for giving Hood twelve 15-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 125: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series1:54:27How surviving Neptune cruisers could preserve the six-inch gunQ&A
- How & Why during WWII Motor Torpedo Boats(MTBs) became Motor Gun Boats(MGBs): Pacific Theatre41:29Was an autoloading 3-inch gun tried on motor gun boats?Q&A
- How & Why during WWII Motor Torpedo Boats(MTBs) became Motor Gun Boats(MGBs): Pacific Theatre3:01:50Why a steel gun mount could worsen alloy-hull corrosionQ&A
- Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics1:52:22Why the first postwar warships were still gun-armedQ&A
- Iron Clad Battles of the War of the Pacific & Chilean Civil War39:08Machinery, guns, and armour aboard Blanco EncaladaNotable Point
- Empire Total War Twitch Stream 9(April 2023)24:12Choosing naval gun size without sacrificing rate of fireNotable Point
- Bruships 106: Song Dynasty & Three New Books from Pen & Sword49:11The Royal Navy often ordered a lifetime supply of gun barrelsQ&A
- Bruships 106: Song Dynasty & Three New Books from Pen & Sword1:18:16Triple-turret guns were staggered to control muzzle-blast interferenceQ&A
- Bruships 106: Song Dynasty & Three New Books from Pen & Sword3:53:33British naval weapons have better introductions than naval armourQ&A
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat29:15Why a fifteen-gun Town-class cruiser became self-defeatingQ&A
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat1:11:07Belgrano's guns mattered after her missiles were spentQ&A
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat2:37:17Every extra anti-aircraft gun needs people, space, and ammunitionQ&A
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat3:28:27The Brandenburg class approached an all-big-gun idea too earlyQ&A
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat4:05:43Single gun mounts trade firepower for easier upkeepQ&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Comment Response Video1:28:12Why Canada chose a Leonardo naval gunQ&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History1:00:47The short nuclear war assumption reshapes Cold War shipsChapter
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 645:19Could Hood have carried 18-inch guns?Q&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 641:29:35A twelve-gun Hood would restart the caliber raceQ&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 641:34:38Forty thousand tons could rescue the KGV quadruple turretQ&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 641:59:06Could Renown take triple 15-inch turrets?Q&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 642:02:20Deutschlands and the logic of cheating properlyChapter
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 642:05:41Why turret complexity rises faster than gun countQ&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 642:10:31How large would a mini-Scharnhorst Deutschland be?Q&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 642:30:50Could Second World War battleship shells be guided?Q&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 642:42:02Should Britain have modernized the 15-inch gun?Q&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 643:13:13Would the three-minute class work better as frigates?Q&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 643:21:06How Fearless and Intrepid should have been designedQ&A
- Columbia (1892) Class: 19th Century Cruisers (+ Star Trek & SSBNX) part 1129:08Armament and armour expose Columbia's combat limitsChapter
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-4010:49Why heavy naval guns were difficult to manufactureQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-4041:23An alternative turret arrangement for the Nelson classQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-4048:28How Britain might answer a revealed 18-inch battleshipQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-4057:13How larger battleship guns reduce the practical batteryQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-4059:54Where naval ammunition handling stops being truly manualQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-401:09:54Why quadruple turrets approach the practical barrel limitQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-401:32:40Only Anson and Howe retained a theoretical redesign windowQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-401:50:46Using existing heavy guns to accelerate new British battleshipsQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-402:09:19British 14-inch guns for the Dutch Design 1047Q&A
- Bruships 84: Science Fiction Strikes Again1:59:32What could replace the Anson subclass's six-inch guns?Q&A
- Five Weaknesses of Allied/Axis/Minor Navies in 1939 & 1940; Response to some Comments47:06French Dunkirk-type ships with British heavy gunsQ&A
- Some Minor Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 193924:17Eleven-inch or fourteen-inch guns for the Dutch designNotable Point
- Some Minor Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 193929:21The Dutch battlecruiser design exerciseNotable Point
- Major Allied Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 19395:45A continuous Dunkerque production alternativeNotable Point
- Major Allied Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 193913:26The policy choice behind the King George V class's 14-inch gunsNotable Point
- Major Allied Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 193915:24Dunkerque turret complexity versus fleet numbersNotable Point
- Offset Strategies One to Four34:06Weapon layout turns redundancy into resilienceChapter
- Bruships 82: New Books, Fun Books & Random Books17:08Sizing an Italian 18-inch-gun battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 82: New Books, Fun Books & Random Books58:39The unresolved evidence for the N3's 18-inch gunQ&A
- Modern Frigates: Cruisers by another name? (Patreon 57 Videos Comment Response)15:23Why swapping Constellation's main gun is not simpleQ&A
- Modern Frigates: Cruisers by any other name? (Patreon 57 Long Patrol)9:32How armoured frigates helped create the cruiser categoryChapter
- Modern Frigates: Cruisers by any other name? (Patreon 57 Long Patrol)26:22Iver Huitfeldt as a cruiser-like frigateChapter
- Modern Frigates: Cruisers by any other name? (Patreon 57 Long Patrol)35:10How Constellation reshapes the FREMM baselineChapter
- Modern Frigates: Cruisers by any other name? (Patreon 57 Long Patrol)1:00:02Why 76 mm guns matter for close-in defenseNotable Point
- Modern Frigates: Cruisers by any other name? (Patreon 57 Long Patrol)1:34:23De Zeven Provinciën as a general-purpose cruiserChapter
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?18:26How the ironclad frigate created the cruiserChapter
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?54:52Why missile shortages could restore naval gunsNotable Point
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?58:48Why smart ammunition favors 40 mm over 30 mmQ&A
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?1:05:06Constellation's gun and presence problemChapter
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?1:57:48F125 and the peacetime-frigate trapChapter
- Blonde Class(Take 2): Scout Cruisers of the WWI Royal Navy (Long Patrol)16:13The 4-inch Mark VII as a counter-destroyer weaponChapter
- Blonde Class(Take 2): Scout Cruisers of the WWI Royal Navy (Long Patrol)21:17The rapid-firing Vickers 3-pounderChapter
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 216:42Why Bismarck's forward turrets were disabledQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 226:02What a modern 16-inch naval gun might becomeQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 237:24Why liquid propellant is dangerous aboard warshipsQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 21:10:31A hybrid Second World War battleshipQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 21:21:42Why naval gun design scales into a different problemQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 21:40:10What Alaska's 12-inch guns say about heavy cruisersQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 21:51:58The tactical and political problem with KGV's 14-inch gunsQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 22:35:50Where an Olympic-class liner could mount gunsQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 22:44:07Why a large cruiser favors 12-inch gunsQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 22:50:55Why a revived naval gun would begin at 6 inchesQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 22:52:01Why France chose Dunkerque's gun calibreQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 22:52:58Could modern yards build for battleship-gun recoil?Q&A
- Bruships 80: Books From Travels34:19Fisher with nuclear propulsion and autoloading heavy gunsQ&A
- Bruships 80: Books From Travels3:09:39Why a 57 mm gun fits the Constellation-class missionQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)1:08:29Recasting the Courageous class as proto-super cruisersQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)1:10:16Could gun turrets survive treaty scrapping?Q&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)1:52:39How triple 15-inch guns could change King George V serviceQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)1:57:26Why the French split-quad turret did not isolate damage wellQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:04:09How continuous destroyer building could accelerate the 4.5-inch gunQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:05:49Why sextuple gun turrets multiply design problemsQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:06:54How Versailles removed Germany's heavy-gun production baseQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:11:43Battleship gun caliber as a national status symbolNotable Point
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:14:16What the Admiral-class companion battleship might carryQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:16:42Why smaller battleship shells do not deliver cruiser-like fire ratesQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)3:02:26Why a fire-support gunboat should not be disguised as a sloopQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)3:07:35When 7.5-inch and 8-inch cruiser guns are comparableQ&A
- Equitable London Treaties: Submarines & Fortifications (Long Patrol)9:10London Treaty submarine size and gun limitsChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Sloops & Other Ships (Long Patrol)15:15The 1936 treaty widened sloop armament optionsChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Sloops & Other Ships (Long Patrol)42:29A proposed 24-knot escort exemptionChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)20:39The 1936 treaty left destroyers loosely definedChapter
- Pensacola Class: US Interwar Cruisers (Long Patrol)7:37Ten guns, a fine hull, and the price in stabilityChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)26:33Why the 10,000-ton rule chilled small-carrier constructionChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)36:12The 1936 treaty narrows carrier size and armamentChapter
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)21:08The 35,000-ton ceiling and puzzling gun clausesChapter
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)24:53King George V armament and the 15-inch alternativeNotable Point
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)1:03:12UAD British and German treaty battleship designsChapter
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)1:08:02Gun range, first hit, and the golden BBNotable Point
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)1:15:38German heavy-gun development under the treatyNotable Point
- Alex & Drach @ Haida (live)5:02Haida's postwar guns and a Falklands comparisonNotable Point
- Patreon 55: History of Survey Ships in the Royal Navy2:08:03Why the Alfonso-class cruisers used gun shieldsQ&A
- Sentinel Class (1904): Scout Cruisers (Long Patrol)12:44A destroyer-fighting battery with little protectionChapter
- Sentinel Class (1904): Scout Cruisers (Long Patrol)47:06A private-venture turbine scout cruiserNotable Point
- Bruships 76: Five New Books & a Lot of New Questions26:05A mixed-calibre Deutschland-class proposalQ&A
- All Forward vs Aft Balance Main Armament: A UAD infused Discussion (Long Patrol)19:17Battle-class destroyers and sectional armamentNotable Point
- Some Sunday Naval Books24:50Armament choices drove the Town-class design spiralNotable Point
- Patreon 44 "More than just ships: Infrastructure - the yards that ruled the world"54:22Why heavy warships were fitted out in graving docksNotable Point
- Question Time: Answering Knight6831's Questions (Long Patrol)5:17Could Britain actually build the N3 and G3 designs?Notable Point
- Question Time: Answering Knight6831's Questions (Long Patrol)9:45What might a ten-barrel pom-pom have changed?Notable Point
- County Cruisers P1: The Kent Class (Long Patrol)9:12Why displacement alone does not define a heavy cruiserNotable Point
- County Cruisers P1: The Kent Class (Long Patrol)17:43The Royal Navy’s unbuilt heavy-cruiser conceptNotable Point
- County Cruisers P1: The Kent Class (Long Patrol)39:02Eight-inch guns and light protectionNotable Point
- Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...1:57:50A treaty-era role for new armoured cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 63: The Writing Theorists - Corbett & Mahan, Richmond & Simms, Cable & Gorshkhov2:22:58How to arrange five battlecruiser turretsQ&A
- Bruships 63: The Writing Theorists - Corbett & Mahan, Richmond & Simms, Cable & Gorshkhov2:30:45Renown's guns and the German need to avoid damageNotable Point
- Bruships 63: The Writing Theorists - Corbett & Mahan, Richmond & Simms, Cable & Gorshkhov2:37:10Why Scharnhorst carried 11-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 63: The Writing Theorists - Corbett & Mahan, Richmond & Simms, Cable & Gorshkhov2:43:13A possible Royal Navy 12-inch heavy cruiserNotable Point
- Bruships 62: Naval History Book Review & Chat1:38:25How British 18-inch work shaped treaty pressureQ&A
- Bruships 62: Naval History Book Review & Chat1:50:01Why navies keep pursuing larger automatic gunsQ&A
- Bruships 62: Naval History Book Review & Chat2:11:53How ordnance factories protected secret gun workNotable Point
- Bruships 62: Naval History Book Review & Chat3:23:45Triple 15-inch guns as a King George V alternativeQ&A
- Bruships 61 - Ship Design; Sci-fi, Wooden & Steel, and some Naval History Questions45:20A British 18-inch gun would likely retain familiar proportionsQ&A
- Bruships 61 - Ship Design; Sci-fi, Wooden & Steel, and some Naval History Questions2:33:53Proximity-fuzed shells mainly threaten exposed systemsQ&A
- Bruships 61 - Ship Design; Sci-fi, Wooden & Steel, and some Naval History Questions4:17:34When a 6-inch destroyer becomes a cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 61 - Ship Design; Sci-fi, Wooden & Steel, and some Naval History Questions4:26:02A practical OPV upgrade stops short of frigate armamentQ&A
- Patreon 38: Evaluating Type 26 Frigates against WW2 ship classes...14:05The City-class baseline: missiles, gun, sonar, and growth spaceChapter
- Patreon 38: Evaluating Type 26 Frigates against WW2 ship classes...1:57:31Railguns trade desired firepower against power and ammunition supplyQ&A
- Patreon 38: Evaluating Type 26 Frigates against WW2 ship classes...2:10:43Twin medium guns trade maintenance savings for combat resilienceQ&A
- Bruships 60: Covid Jab, Bad Back & New Books51:07What happens when missiles run shortQ&A
- Bruships 60: Covid Jab, Bad Back & New Books3:24:20Naval guns for a long warQ&A
- 21 Christmas Books for 2021 - Bruships 59: Books & Naval History Chat28:54Carrier guns should support the carrier roleQ&A
- 21 Christmas Books for 2021 - Bruships 59: Books & Naval History Chat1:16:48An 18-inch-gun Queen Elizabeth fleetQ&A
- 21 Christmas Books for 2021 - Bruships 59: Books & Naval History Chat1:19:36An 18-inch Revenge class would favour six guns and speedQ&A
- Bruships 56: "Walking Softly & Carrying a Big Stick" - Admirals, Diplomacy & Detterence1:44:03War accelerates adoption more reliably than inventionQ&A
- Bruships 56: "Walking Softly & Carrying a Big Stick" - Admirals, Diplomacy & Detterence2:06:46Why a Gatling layout could help a heavy automatic gunQ&A
- Bruships 56: "Walking Softly & Carrying a Big Stick" - Admirals, Diplomacy & Detterence2:14:36A 16-inch Gatling gun would become a thousand-ton installationQ&A
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper1:03:41Tanks as protection and visible coercive powerNotable Point
- Bruships 52: A Year of Bruships - Questions & Books2:01:10Could modern industry build battleship guns again?Notable Point
- Bruships 51: The Age of Iron1:47:14Modern armor against First World War gunsQ&A
- Bruships 51: The Age of Iron2:38:22Why iron hulls did not end combat lossesQ&A
- Patreon 21: Notable WW2 commanders of smaller naval forces2:24:50Why the Falklands restored the case for naval gunsNotable Point
- Bruships 42: Some More Scifi2:17:54Why choose a 57 mm gun instead of a 76 mm gun?Q&A
- Bruships 42: Some More Scifi2:28:39A Bofors analogy links engineering independence to integration problemsNotable Point
- Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects42:15Why two 32-gun ships could have different fighting powerNotable Point
- Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects2:21:07Courageous and Glorious against lighter ships in narrow watersNotable Point
- Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects2:22:54What makes a coastal-defence battleship?Q&A
- Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects2:55:26Should modern Royal Navy ships carry twin medium guns?Q&A
- Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects3:00:38Why the Royal Navy chose the 4.5-inch gunQ&A
- Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects3:01:44A programmable 40 mm Gatling mount for warshipsQ&A
- Minesweepers, Torpedo Boats & Gunboats – the ‘Littleships’ of the big war2:06:49Sustaining the Des Moines class's rapid eight-inch fireQ&A
- Minesweepers, Torpedo Boats & Gunboats – the ‘Littleships’ of the big war2:10:08The largest practical gun for a wartime destroyerQ&A
- An Introduction to My Top 10 Warships (No Tribal, Battle, Daring or Town Classes allowed)4:25HMS Meteor and the M-class destroyersNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 1: Book Reviews/Q&A1:19:20Layered naval guns and the return of long-range fire supportQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 1: Book Reviews/Q&A1:25:04Coilguns offered speed to service while railguns promised moreQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 1: Book Reviews/Q&A1:25:54Lasers need guns in a weather-resistant defensive layerQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 1: Book Reviews/Q&A1:47:34PT-boat weapons followed the targets actually encounteredQ&A
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers - A live stream19:26Deck-penetrating turrets shaped the Battle-class layoutChapter
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers - A live stream21:09Why the Battle class lacked a stern main turretNotable Point