If Hood carried 18-inch guns, would the US Navy decide that its 16-inch/45 was no longer enough?
Short answerThe pressure would favor the developing 16-inch/50, though it remains unclear whether the 16-inch/45 becomes inadequate.
NotesAn 18-inch-gunned Hood would not immediately invalidate the American 16-inch/45. The United States was already developing a longer 16-inch/50 weapon and could emphasize it in response. The short exchange does not reach a firm conclusion on whether the 16-inch/45 is insufficient. An altered Hood would change treaty and design choices without making every smaller-caliber battleship useless overnight.