Related time notes
- Britain's Rearmament 1937 vs 2026: What Lessons are we forgetting?42:45Cruiser orders kept armour production aliveNotable Point
- Bruships 264: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:38:42Did ending the Anglo-Japanese Alliance weaken Britain's position?Q&A
- Soviet Destroyers of the 1930s: Trying to Rebuild/Build a navy in the face of heart led shipyards...16:22Rebuilding shipbuilding skill through achievable designsNotable Point
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...47:04Diesel cruisers, treaty limits and established machinery systemsQ&A
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live11:38Continuous shipbuilding, employment, and capital flowChapter
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:51:32Keeping equipment from treaty-scrapped battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:07:22A communist revolution in France in 1933Q&A
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:59:55Continuous shipbuilding and Germany's loss of design experienceQ&A
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:00:47Why Yamato's design logic depends on the treaty-era fleetNotable Point
- Momi to Kagero - The Story of the Japanese 1920s & 1930s Destroyer Program39:25Treaty limits and an inherited attrition planChapter
- Momi to Kagero - The Story of the Japanese 1920s & 1930s Destroyer Program1:01:22Article 8 and the torpedo-boat openingChapter
- Momi to Kagero - The Story of the Japanese 1920s & 1930s Destroyer Program1:31:19Why six guns on a larger Asashio?Notable Point
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live21:11Overage ships and the twenty-year thresholdNotable Point
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live22:22A British battleship with sixteen 14-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:52:06Germany retaining two Derfflinger battlecruisersQ&A
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:16:40Carrier armour, air groups and treaty tonnageNotable Point
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:19:06Later large carrier designs convergeNotable Point
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:21:50If Tiger exploded during the First World WarQ&A
- Marine Nationale go all Free French in June 1940...2:22French and Italian fleets in the treaty eraChapter
- Marine Nationale go all Free French in June 1940...19:18Redoutable patrol submarines: range, speed and armamentChapter
- Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail?8:18How strategic interests affect treaty restraintNotable Point
- Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:22:43Could preserved Lion-class battlecruisers return for another war?Q&A
- Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:41:25How a naval treaty delayed until 1927 could change fleet limitsQ&A
- Churchill's Good ideas: the actually good, the bad, and the ridiculous1:26:08A 1920s Anglo-French-Japanese naval allianceQ&A
- 14 Acts and 7 Classes - the story of the USN Interwar Destroyers1:21:29The Second Cruiser Act enlarged the fleet and left the destroyer gapChapter
- 14 Acts and 7 Classes - the story of the USN Interwar Destroyers1:56:01The Vinson-Trammell Act finally authorized treaty-strength replacementChapter
- America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class0:00The counterfactual starts with an early Alaska orderChapter
- America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class9:55Why Alaska is a large cruiserNotable Point
- America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class28:47Why did navies avoid building every carrier at the maximum size?Q&A
- America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class30:32The Hawkins-based limit and the missing middle-sized cruiserNotable Point
- What happens if instead of Gallipoli, Fisher gets Churchill to go for the Baltic? (Patreon)2:14:41How an early peace could change American fleet constructionNotable Point
- What happens if instead of Gallipoli, Fisher gets Churchill to go for the Baltic? (Patreon)2:20:11A shorter war without the historical naval treaty systemChapter
- Task Force Doctrine; How it evolved from WWI to WWII in the big three navys - IJN, RN & USN(Patreon)49:17Could naval treaties have lasted as building limits?Q&A
- Task Force Doctrine; How it evolved from WWI to WWII in the big three navys - IJN, RN & USN(Patreon)50:48Treaties met three different strategic problemsQ&A
- Task Force Doctrine; How it evolved from WWI to WWII in the big three navys - IJN, RN & USN(Patreon)2:13:46Fleet-wide treaty tonnage constrained cruiser numbersNotable Point
- Task Force Doctrine; How it evolved from WWI to WWII in the big three navys - IJN, RN & USN(Patreon)2:36:13Separate treaty allowances could have changed carrier fleetsQ&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...42:45Treaty battlecruisers grow into fast battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...55:21A treaty category for 10-inch large cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:02:09Existing orders at the Washington Naval TreatyQ&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:25:12The cruiser red line at WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...12:29G3 guns and completion dates in a no-treaty scenarioQ&A
- Ideal Destroyers: Screening Fleets & National Interests from 1890 to Today29:20Exercise bias understates destroyer air defenceNotable Point
- What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?11:00Washington treaty rules block the historical Tiger gun changeChapter
- What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?22:48The London treaty removes Tiger before her replacement is readyNotable Point
- What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?32:07A 15-inch standardization bargain changes the treaty pathChapter
- What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?34:23Standard displacement hides Tiger's full-load scaleNotable Point
- Bruships 246: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:09:33A treaty-era battleship razee would make a poor cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 246: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:29:57Treaty-free navies would build their own Tiger Cub cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 246: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:49:41A German victory would prevent the interwar naval treaty pauseQ&A
- Bruships 246: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:49:45A larger surviving cruiser can rewrite the whole treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships 246: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:19:01An expanded prewar Royal Navy could use a Tiger as a testbedQ&A
- Bruships 245: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...26:58Washington treaty swaps and modern battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships 245: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...55:45Preserving HMS Lion without a concrete graveQ&A
- Bruships 245: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:39:28Dividing the High Seas Fleet after Scapa FlowQ&A
- Bruships 245: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:39:52A floating alternative for preserving MikasaQ&A
- How Ship Design is a reflection of Navy's attempts to balance technology, strategy and memory...16:19Yorktown and Illustrious fit different geostrategiesChapter
- How Ship Design is a reflection of Navy's attempts to balance technology, strategy and memory...21:51Treaty limits make carrier designs divergeNotable Point
- Bruships 244: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:12:28Tiger, Iron Duke, and treaty-retention politicsQ&A
- Bruships 244: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:32:13How larger Hawkins cruisers would shift treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 240: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:05:00South American navies in the treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships 240: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:26:31A treaty-compliant Bismarck designQ&A
- Bruships 240: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:40:28A South American arms race and naval-treaty limitsQ&A
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)9:40China and Korea inside the treaty textChapter
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)16:06Article 4 in the 1902 treaty has no American exceptionQ&A
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)49:09The Four-Power Treaty replaces alliance obligations with consultationChapter
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)53:34Why the Four-Power Treaty used English and FrenchQ&A
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)1:11:27Victory makes postwar limits feel insultingQ&A
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)1:29:07Number 13 and L3 designs against American standard battleshipsNotable Point
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)1:32:42Debt repayment and the appeal of naval treatiesNotable Point
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)1:33:52A Harding administration that rejects the Washington settlementChapter
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)1:42:37Aircraft carriers do not depend on WashingtonQ&A
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)1:46:11Carrier technology still matures during the 1930sNotable Point
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)1:53:51Australia and New Zealand strengthen the Four-Power TreatyChapter
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)2:02:48A later treaty limits ship size rather than fleet ratiosNotable Point
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)2:07:33Australian capital ships create a Pacific security dilemmaNotable Point
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)2:11:34Treaties soften the British-American power transitionNotable Point
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)2:29:37A stronger treaty rewards cooperative Japanese factionsQ&A
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)2:34:51Japan builds purpose-designed carriers without conversion rulesQ&A
- Bruships 239: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...restart8:41How a weak U.S. battle fleet changes the Pacific balanceNotable Point
- Bruships 239: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...restart23:52Vanguard, treaty limits, and the meaning of fast battleshipNotable Point
- Bruships 239: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...restart25:46HMS Incomparable as deterrent and white elephantQ&A
- Bruships 239: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...restart28:48How Incomparable could disrupt naval limitationNotable Point
- Bruships17:33Seventy cruisers and treaty bargainingQ&A
- Bruships 239: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:09:05Fourteen-inch battleship gun doctrineQ&A
- Special Catch Up Ramblings on Behalf of @TheFleetOfOceans1:48:11Would British carriers face range problems in the Pacific?Q&A
- Special Catch Up Ramblings on Behalf of @TheFleetOfOceans1:54:55Ark Royal operations challenge her published enduranceNotable Point
- What happens if the entirety of the French Navy decides to carry on fighting in WWII? (Patreon Live)11:11Treaty allowances and funded fleets give different naval rankingsNotable Point
- What happens if the entirety of the French Navy decides to carry on fighting in WWII? (Patreon Live)32:49Why Britain expected French submarines to cover the MediterraneanQ&A
- What happens if the entirety of the French Navy decides to carry on fighting in WWII? (Patreon Live)34:02Britain's submarine-ban campaign coexisted with heavy investmentNotable Point
- What happens if the entirety of the French Navy decides to carry on fighting in WWII? (Patreon Live)35:18Submarine abolition could win Britain concessions elsewhereNotable Point
- What happens if the entirety of the French Navy decides to carry on fighting in WWII? (Patreon Live)1:08:14Treaty limits did not cap French submarine numbersQ&A
- What happens if the entirety of the French Navy decides to carry on fighting in WWII? (Patreon Live)1:08:56Britain benefited from the story that it hated submarinesQ&A
- Could the Royal Navy have lauched a Carrier Strike in WWI on Wilhelmshaven?1:18:31An earlier victory could delay naval treatiesChapter
- Could the Royal Navy have lauched a Carrier Strike in WWI on Wilhelmshaven?1:20:40Britain could build four more carriers alongside four AdmiralsNotable Point
- Bruships 238: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:41:24US battleships standardized on triple 14-inch turretsQ&A
- Bruships 238: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:35:14British gun standardization and destroyer sizeQ&A
- Bruships 238: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:29:04France's bargaining position at WashingtonQ&A
- Lions not Indefatigables; What if Australia & New Zealand go Battlecruiser not Battle Cruiser...1:21:01How a harsher Dogger Bank could prevent JutlandChapter
- France Libre's daring contre-torpilleurs & torpilleur d'escadre; The Free French Destroyers of WWII33:53How naval treaties pushed destroyers toward cruiser rolesNotable Point
- Bruships 235: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...31:12Why a 3,000-ton six-inch destroyer becomes a fragile cruiserQ&A
- What if the Royal Navy's Aircraft Carrier HMS Hermes had sisters in the 1920s? (Patreon Live)7:42Washington Treaty pressure for smaller carriersChapter
- What if the Royal Navy's Aircraft Carrier HMS Hermes had sisters in the 1920s? (Patreon Live)27:20Designing a Hermes sister under 10,000 tonsNotable Point
- What if the Royal Navy's Aircraft Carrier HMS Hermes had sisters in the 1920s? (Patreon Live)55:38How the London Treaty might create a light-carrier allowanceChapter
- What if the Royal Navy's Aircraft Carrier HMS Hermes had sisters in the 1920s? (Patreon Live)1:03:14Lexington conversions consume half the US carrier allowanceNotable Point
- What if the Royal Navy's Aircraft Carrier HMS Hermes had sisters in the 1920s? (Patreon Live)1:09:45Separate allowances could support larger fleet carriersNotable Point
- What if the Royal Navy's Aircraft Carrier HMS Hermes had sisters in the 1920s? (Patreon Live)1:29:29Could a heavy-cruiser hull become a small carrier?Q&A
- Bruships 234: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:43:33F3, longer 15-inch guns and the political appeal of 16-inch gunsNotable Point
- Top/Bottom 5 inventions/adaptations of RN ships that came from the ships themselves...(Patreon Live)2:27:42If naval treaties had not limited destroyer numbersQ&A
- Top/Bottom 5 inventions/adaptations of RN ships that came from the ships themselves...(Patreon Live)2:35:21Could Canada store a reserve fleet on the Great Lakes?Q&A
- Bruships 233: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...12:00What naval treaties teach about nuclear arms controlQ&A
- Bruships 233: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:36:29A 20,000-ton Washington Treaty loopholeQ&A
- If WWII is delayed, what do the Warships of the 1950s look like?12:50Fast battleships remain central beyond treaty limitsChapter
- If WWII is delayed, what do the Warships of the 1950s look like?29:09Larger carriers balance air groups, protection, and survivabilityNotable Point
- If WWII is delayed, what do the Warships of the 1950s look like?37:03Large destroyers take over small-cruiser dutiesNotable Point
- If WWII is delayed, what do the Warships of the 1950s look like?49:13Destroyers divide into leaders, fleet ships, and escortsChapter
- If WWII is delayed, what do the Warships of the 1950s look like?1:14:43Auxiliaries and adaptable merchant ships support larger fleetsNotable Point
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:55:28Replacing a battleship lost during the treaty periodQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:46:26How 9.2-inch Hawkins cruisers reshape treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:39:55Why treaty battleships adopted quadruple turretsQ&A
- What if Force Z(HMS Prince of Wales & HMS Repulse) doesn't get sunk on the 10th of December 1941?38:15Naval treaties leave the Eastern Fleet old and slowNotable Point
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...56:38How navies would exploit an ice-loading treaty allowanceQ&A
- Harnessing and Maintaining Thoughtful Aggression! Royal Navy Destroyers of the Interwar Years...56:04Alphabet classes grow around the torpedo attackChapter
- Harnessing and Maintaining Thoughtful Aggression! Royal Navy Destroyers of the Interwar Years...58:18Why official torpedo loads omit spare weaponsNotable Point
- Harnessing and Maintaining Thoughtful Aggression! Royal Navy Destroyers of the Interwar Years...1:02:18Published destroyer figures offer an incomplete pictureNotable Point
- Harnessing and Maintaining Thoughtful Aggression! Royal Navy Destroyers of the Interwar Years...1:09:34Foreign destroyer orders become wartime reinforcementsNotable Point
- Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:15Why Japan could not simply swap carrier conversion hullsQ&A
- Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:00:40Designing capital ships around treaty loopholesQ&A
- Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:10:26Why 10-inch and 8-inch cruiser bands failQ&A
- Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:13:46Why naval officers were excluded from treaty talksQ&A
- Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:14:31Who pressed to exclude naval officers from treaty discussions?Q&A
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?0:00How selective cheating kept the Washington Treaty aliveNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?3:46How standard displacement could hide wartime weightChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?6:41Light peacetime armour on a hull prepared for warNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?9:55Carrier definitions leave aviation weight open to argumentChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?13:40Why mutual cheating discouraged formal accusationsNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?15:03Auxiliaries designed for rapid carrier conversionChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?17:26The sub-10,000-ton carrier escape hatchChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?19:15What each navy historically chose to bendNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?21:22Cruiser turrets shared with coastal batteriesNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?23:37Keeping condemned warships available through other usesNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?27:41Using gun liners to preserve a larger wartime calibreChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?32:00The ten-year peace assumption nobody trustedNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?33:13G3 conversions anchor a five-carrier strike forceChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?37:32A separate proposal for five declared 27,000-ton carriersNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?39:19Why words like designed and intended create diplomatic latitudeNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?45:32Small-carrier fleets complicate later tonnage limitsNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?49:47New-ship declarations and protective feed-water tanksChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?53:41Greater naval confidence could open diplomatic discussionsNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?57:18An F3-style fast capital ship prepared for extra armourChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?1:00:32Could replacing Tiger justify a third British capital ship?Notable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?1:09:02Using a capital-ship accident to unlock replacement tonnageNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?1:18:48A failed London settlement and continued shipbuildingChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?1:23:23Why mutual cheating might discourage a war of aggressionNotable Point
- The Tribal Class's Sisters... the Royal Navy's J, K & N Class Destroyers of WWII6:24I-class torpedoes and wartime acquisition of export warshipsChapter
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 20261:01:40Did treaty limits hold back destroyer growth?Q&A
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 20261:11:46Japanese destroyers gained value as individual warshipsChapter
- Bruships 227: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:58:44Carrier treaty limits forced a choice between individual capability and numbersNotable Point
- What if the Royal Navy carried out a carrier strike against Wilhelmshaven in WWI? Patreon Live36:39How hangar height consumed a carrier's weight allowanceNotable Point
- Why the different major navies used Cruiser Aviation in the 1920s&30s...21:21French cruisers carry a global mission on treaty displacementChapter
- Why the different major navies used Cruiser Aviation in the 1920s&30s...22:28A proposed French cruiser fleet divides missions between smaller shipsNotable Point
- Why is a Frigate a Frigate and other questions of modern navys?30:10Interwar sloops prepared Britain for mass escort constructionChapter
- Bruships 225: Naval History & Current Affairs Questions Answered Live...13:32Completed Caracciolo-class ships could reshape the treaty battleship raceQ&A
- Bruships 225: Naval History & Current Affairs Questions Answered Live...16:46Could naval treaties discount the tonnage of ageing battleships?Q&A
- Bruships 225: Naval History & Current Affairs Questions Answered Live...2:33:49Twenty-eight-knot Queen Elizabeths would bring the fast battleship forward a generationQ&A
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)53:46How treaty limits restrained interwar ship growthQ&A
- Trumps Battleship; A Naval History view on what we know of the Defiant Class so far13:01Why machinery changes the battleship and battlecruiser spectrumNotable Point
- What the Frigates up with our Frigates? A Bilgepumps Christmas 2025 @Drachinifel& @wgowshipping1:21:47Third-rate does not mean badly builtNotable Point
- Building the Royal Canadian Navy for WWII15:16Shipyard investment offered Depression-era employmentNotable Point
- Bruships 223: Naval History & Science Fiction Questions Answered Live...1:14:57Bismarck and the naval treaty systemNotable Point
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...43:20Why Vanguard could be built while the Lions stalledNotable Point
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:07:47Britain receives a fleet of Defence-style super cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:15:51Choosing capital-ship guns after the treaty system breaksQ&A
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:27:04Treaty limits and turbo-electric warship propulsionQ&A
- Planning for Pearl Harbor: Decisions to Strike at the USN's mid-pacific base...10:23The treaty ratio turns insecurity into planning pressureNotable Point
- Planning for Pearl Harbor: Decisions to Strike at the USN's mid-pacific base...1:12:17Treaty carrier design and operating theatersNotable Point
- Chatting Books, Amazon & Youtube with Glynn Stewart: #2historians #scifi33:04Naval treaty expectations and uncertainty about space weaponsNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 14: Aircraft Carriers2:20Small carriers free Japan's strike-carrier tonnageNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 14: Aircraft Carriers3:26Working small carriers could displace Ranger and WaspQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 14: Aircraft Carriers8:54Light-carrier treaty arithmetic and fleet tradeoffsNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 14: Aircraft Carriers12:29Dominion carriers complicate treaty limitsNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 14: Aircraft Carriers15:33US and Royal Navy light-carrier build pathsQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 14: Aircraft Carriers38:22Lexington's eight-inch guns and the cruiser treaty limitsNotable Point
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:31:10Destroyer size, treaty tonnage, and deployable numbersQ&A
- More Lessons of Never Built Carriers4:22Treaty tonnage forced armor-versus-air-group choicesNotable Point
- More Lessons of Never Built Carriers12:58How British carrier studies turned missions into compromisesNotable Point
- More Lessons of Never Built Carriers43:57Chatfield's treaty strategy favored many small carriersChapter
- More Lessons of Never Built Carriers48:13Treaties could not erase knowledge of larger warshipsNotable Point
- More Lessons of Never Built Carriers51:26Counterfactuals test when paper carriers could matterNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle11:27Replacing Mutsu after an imagined 1930 magazine explosionQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle16:47Designing Queen Elizabeth and Revenge for a treaty-limited futureQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle31:15A 9.2-inch cruiser program sent back to 1915Q&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle43:09Choosing a 10-inch cruiser limit to favour 9.2-inch gunsQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle48:27Could submarine size limits favour coastal defence?Q&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle4:36:39If treaty powers had to buy capital ships from one anotherQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…3:41:37Testing an F3-inspired alternative to King George VChapter
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…8:16:01How a 1929 war could break the naval treaty systemQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…8:17:49Which ships would Japan replace after a hypothetical 1929 war?Q&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…8:22:13Could naval treaties survive without national fleet ratios?Q&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…8:25:38A qualitative-only treaty transforms British carrier developmentChapter
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon19:31What Black Swan's 20-knot rating concealedQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon6:57:05How a scout-carrier category could expand the Royal NavyQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust1:37:01Why American entry in 1915 would not instantly end World War IQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust1:10:26How far an equitable capital-ship treaty might expandQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust1:14:19How a stronger Turkish battlefleet changes neutrality and naval treatiesQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust1:19:03What the naval treaties allowed shipbuilders to exportQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust1:21:09Why treaty export construction differed from disposing of warshipsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust1:28:46How a major Siamese fleet changes the war for Southeast AsiaQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress4:15:28Arethusa-class cruisers and fleet quantityNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress5:48:51Arethusa and Cleveland reveal different cruiser doctrinesQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress5:52:50Fitted-for-but-not-with treaty cruisersNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress11:16:58How navies might answer the Deutschland class without treaty limitsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress11:18:08When a cruiser response becomes a capital-ship programQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida6:02:51A heavier 30-knot King George V proposalQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy I1:49:28Where modern English-language ship classifications come fromQ&A
- Bruships 220: Naval History Questions Answered Live...15:41How new treaty cruiser categories might reshape fleetsQ&A
- Bruships 219: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:47:33Double-displacement destroyer leaders under treaty rulesQ&A
- What happpens if Admiral "Jackie" Fisher & Admiral R.G.H Henderson Swap Third Sea Lord Tenures?47:17Convertible tanks exploit treaty displacement rulesNotable Point
- What happpens if Admiral "Jackie" Fisher & Admiral R.G.H Henderson Swap Third Sea Lord Tenures?1:03:19Fisher confronts treaties, the Treasury, and the Air MinistryChapter
- What happpens if Admiral "Jackie" Fisher & Admiral R.G.H Henderson Swap Third Sea Lord Tenures?1:10:40Fisher turns treaty limits into a public political battleChapter
- What happpens if Admiral "Jackie" Fisher & Admiral R.G.H Henderson Swap Third Sea Lord Tenures?1:17:33A weak escalator clause empties the treaty of restraintNotable Point
- What would the World's Major Navys look like in 1950 if WWII didn't happen? (Live)2:45:20Could new naval treaties stop the 1940s arms race?Q&A
- Procuring for Peace First Draft1:05:09Treaty rules distorted the choice between sloops and destroyersChapter
- Procuring for Peace First Draft1:07:29Presence gives smaller navies a seat at the tableChapter
- Procuring for Peace First Draft1:18:17Treaty building holidays disrupted naval productionNotable Point
- What happens if the X-1 Cruiser Submarine becomes genesis not a dockyard queen?11:37The London Naval Treaty already allowed large submarinesChapter
- What happens if the X-1 Cruiser Submarine becomes genesis not a dockyard queen?14:30Britain first has to abandon submarine abolitionNotable Point
- Bruships 216 On the Road Japan 2025: Last one from Japan! Naval History Questions Answered Live...28:58Would large Swedish battleships draw Sweden into naval treaties?Q&A
- Bruships 216 On the Road Japan 2025: Last one from Japan! Naval History Questions Answered Live...29:17Could Sweden retain the industrial plant to build battleships?Notable Point
- What if the High Seas Fleet was not Scuttled in Scapa Flow?1:11:18A different London naval treaty in 1925Chapter
- What if the High Seas Fleet was not Scuttled in Scapa Flow?1:13:39Carrier programs grow before a delayed treatyNotable Point
- What if the High Seas Fleet was not Scuttled in Scapa Flow?1:14:52How treaty delay weakens the memory of warNotable Point
- What if the High Seas Fleet was not Scuttled in Scapa Flow?1:15:20The unknown 1923 capital-ship generationNotable Point
- What the Royal Navy thought of Coral Sea, Midway and Leyte Gulf?51:14Why the Royal Navy invested in night shadowingNotable Point
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...After Power Cut10:43A 1937 cruiser built around six 15-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...After Power Cut46:23Three 500,000-ton super-ships appear in JapanQ&A
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...After Power Cut1:33:08A 50,000-ton British battleship sketch for 1922Q&A
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...38:43Why Allied navies would discard captured German battleshipsNotable Point
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:25:23Scrapping under Washington versus scuttling after VersaillesQ&A
- #2Historians Live: With @Drachinifel comes to chat & build UAD Dreadnoughts that Almost were P33:21:36Was the development of modern naval warfare set in stone?Q&A
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why48:22The missed high-angle future of the British 4.7-inchNotable Point
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why1:48:44The decisive advantage was the whole gun systemNotable Point
- Admiral Henderson's Dream? A Four Carrier Battle of Taranto...4:23Fleet carriers, strike carriers, and treaty tonnageChapter
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?1:18:53Treaty compliance could leave room for later armour and emergency powerNotable Point
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?2:22:10Limited building could have kept battleship design evolvingNotable Point
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:37:16A non-communist Russia reshapes the interwar orderQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:21:17Matching destroyer orders with interwar sloopsQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:25:04How treaty wording leaves room for a heavily armed sloopNotable Point
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:27:27A modern 3-inch battery inside an interwar sloop ruleNotable Point
- Bruships 207: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:51:30A 15-inch HMS Tiger against the German battlecruisersQ&A
- Bruships 207: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:04:03Why British destroyers kept the 21-inch torpedoQ&A
- Sir Eustace Tennyson d'Eyncourt: WWI Royal Navy's Director of Naval Construction40:22Design ambition constrained by politics and treatiesNotable Point
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?58:16How treaty limits changed battleship tacticsChapter
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?1:25:03The interwar sloop fleet Britain could have builtNotable Point
- Bruships 206: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:32:55Warship sales remained legal under naval treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...12:12Redesigning the Pensacola-class cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...46:26Interwar fleets without cruiser and carrier limitsQ&A
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:42:35Where torpedo boats stop being small craftQ&A
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:36:21Choosing the worst treaty heavy cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:42:27Canadian carrier construction and treaty loopholesQ&A
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:39:45A faster twelve-gun Nelson classQ&A
- Naval Ranks: The Video that will make all Lieutenants Hate me... permanently...2:06:58Why interwar naval treaties became a pressure cookerQ&A
- Queen Bees: The almost 'Original Drones' from the 1930s22:37HMS Argus became an experimental drone carrierChapter
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:57:42Light-cruiser escorts for the PanzerschiffeQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:02:48A German raider threat drives British light-carrier policyNotable Point
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:57:13Would an early Soviet carrier force change the naval building pause?Q&A
- Cruiser-borne aviation of the major navies; aspirations, doctrine & realities of this capability3:01:14Why Tone still carried a full forward gun batteryQ&A
- Why didn't the Royal Navy go for High Pressure boilers & what if they got 850psi boilers in 1934?0:23What changes when 850 psi boilers arrive in 1934?Q&A
- Why didn't the Royal Navy go for High Pressure boilers & what if they got 850psi boilers in 1934?57:11Yorktown and Enterprise under the same boiler revolutionNotable Point
- Bruships 201: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:58:11Could Alaska fit the pocket-battleship role?Q&A
- Bruships 201: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:49:00How 1920s US infrastructure investment could reshape naval competitionQ&A
- Bruships 201: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:49:27World of Warships designs inserted into the 1936 Royal NavyQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 12: Not Pocket Battleships, No Guadalcanal and a load of Submarine Signals?33:20Treaty tonnage forced carrier armor and air-group compromisesNotable Point
- Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:37:04If the Mogami class kept its 6-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:18:44Secret Number 13-class battleships and Japanese readinessQ&A
- Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:24:39Naval treaties based on hull count instead of tonnageQ&A
- Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:03:00A reading path into naval history and treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...24:13Fisher's 20-inch Incomparables replace the large light cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:31:48Disarmed warships wait in the Great LakesQ&A
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:32:57Haida and Buffalo's museum ships under Great Lakes restrictionsQ&A
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:33:48Building Constellation frigates on the Great LakesQ&A
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:42:05Royal Navy classifications, concealed gun development and treaty flexibilityQ&A
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:47:25County-class armor provisions varied between batches and refitsNotable Point
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:19:42British naval rearmament begins in 1933Q&A
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:24:58Earlier North Carolinas start with 16-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:54:44Treaty cruiser-carriers create numerous light flight decksQ&A
- Pom-Pom or Bofors: Which 40mm do you want?54:09Norway exposes the demands of fleet air defenseChapter
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?3:10:26What would later naval treaties regulate?Q&A
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?3:16:21Could treaties give battlecruisers their own category?Q&A
- Ship Propellers: A Quick History & Discussion37:27Propulsion generations complicate warship classificationNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 11: from SDSR to Pearl Harbor, with a stop at CVA-01 along the way...23:19Who gained most from the interwar naval treaty system?Q&A
- Admiral of the Fleet Philip Vian: Boundless Aggression or...19:20Arethusa's design and the need for fleet scoutsChapter
- Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:08:41Why British naval treaty limits still mattered in 1937Notable Point
- Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:41:00Starting books for interwar warship conversionsQ&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:05:57Could Nelson and Rodney be redesigned for 28 knots?Q&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:10:02Would other navies demand ships after an early Italian challenge?Q&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:56:05Why Hawkins and County cruisers began as large light cruisersQ&A
- Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?23:00Dido force design under treaty limitsChapter
- Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?25:01Dido concentrated six forward guns against destroyer attacksNotable Point
- Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?33:07Dido endurance beyond the official figuresNotable Point
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:49:25Designing the Royal Navy and US Navy without naval treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:58:21Building a sustainable Japanese fleet without naval treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:01:39How larger guns on Hood could reshape the Washington TreatyQ&A
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:04:42How America might answer a 16.5-inch HoodQ&A
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:49:35What Britain might build in response to the Alaska classQ&A
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:54:12How large could battleships grow without naval treaties?Q&A
- Bruships 193: Naval History Questions Answered Live...18:31The 1930 London conference and earlier Washington treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 193: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:25:48Why the King George V class received 14-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 193: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:27:20Why a larger-gunned KGV alternative stops at 16 inchesQ&A
- Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?36:28Atlanta and Dido emerged in parallelChapter
- Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?1:05:34Atlanta as a destroyer-built cruiserChapter
- Bruships 191: Naval History Questions Answered Live...31:53How naval treaties arrived at 8-inch and 16-inch gun limitsQ&A
- Bruships 191: Naval History Questions Answered Live...58:03If naval officers had led the 1930 London treaty talksQ&A
- Genesis of the Stomach Churners: Motor Landing Craft & Landing Craft Mechanised...10:41The Ten Year Rule restricted amphibious investmentChapter
- Genesis of the Stomach Churners: Motor Landing Craft & Landing Craft Mechanised...12:45Treaty-exempt sloops offered another route for naval investmentNotable Point
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued5:10German commercial shipbuilding under naval treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued29:47Could unrestricted shipbuilding accelerate British jets?Q&A
- Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...35:47F3 and the timing of the Washington Naval TreatyNotable Point
- Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...37:24A 35,000-ton British battlecruiserQ&A
- Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...41:46Why treaty negotiators favored a 14-inch limitQ&A
- Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...2:01:38If King George V had retained 16-inch gunsQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 9 - A long time coming...5:19Why navies could not replace battleships with cruiser swarmsQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 9 - A long time coming...13:01How prescriptive naval treaties limited fleet adaptationNotable Point
- How Admirals Shape Ships? From the Frigate built Galleons to Arleigh Burkes...1:20:55Henderson's carrier concept under treaty limitsChapter
- How Admirals Shape Ships? From the Frigate built Galleons to Arleigh Burkes...1:29:04Cumulative treaty tonnage governs carrier numbersNotable Point
- An Indomitable Force Z3:21Construction pauses delayed the Royal Navy's carrier programChapter
- Seaplane Tenders: An Earlier Answer to the Battle of the Atlantic?18:15Naval treaty rules left room for large aviation tendersNotable Point
- The British Admiralty 1628-1964: Some Examples of First Sea Lords and How they worked1:51:37Charles Madden and the First London Naval TreatyChapter
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:36:10A neutral Pacific navy could enlarge a French cruiser designQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:10:54How the Royal Navy preferred to bend treaty rulesQ&A
- Could Seaplanes Tenders have been used in the Battle for the Atlantic? Naval History Live!44:57How the London Naval Treaty left room for tendersNotable Point
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:14:30Secret British or American 18-inch battleshipsQ&A
- Tōgō Heihachirō: Victor of Tsushima & Japan's Nelson...1:31:32Tōgō as elder statesman and cruiser advocateChapter
- Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...Part II38:46Would Britain have preferred a 16.5-inch treaty limit?Q&A
- Guard Ships: What they were & What they are... Key Ship Series 924:23Reserve ships freed first-line forces for the decisive theatreNotable Point
- The Leadership Factor: The Battle of the Barents Sea1:19:52Treaty concerns delayed destroyers whose designs were already availableNotable Point
- Bruships 177: New Year, same Dr Alex... possibly with new gym membership1:36:39How fast Nelsons could destabilize the interwar treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships 177: New Year, same Dr Alex... possibly with new gym membership4:34:29Why allowing Germany to retain Seydlitz would widen naval arms controlQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?3:18:20Naval limitation offered governments an escape from capital costsQ&A
- Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 20244:07:14Why fleet availability blocked Hood's reconstructionQ&A
- Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 20244:46:42What Japan gains by designing treaty ships around stabilityQ&A
- Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 20244:51:14The Lion class as Britain's greatest missed 1930s battleship opportunityQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?1:00:58How Tillman-sized carriers could reshape WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?1:15:48An 18-inch Hood could break the historical treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?1:40:42Why the hunt for Bismarck became possibleQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?2:09:23Would Hood's 18-inch guns make the US 16-inch/45 obsolete?Q&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?2:47:05A separate battlecruiser category at WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?4:15:56Treaty-exempt sloops could have transformed the Battle of the AtlanticQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?4:34:03Could Ryujo work below 10,000 tons?Q&A
- The Monroe Doctrine: The Myth, The Legend, The Rhetoric, The Reality!22:30Freedom of the seas and the limits of Pax BritannicaNotable Point
- Bruships 173: Christmas Books for the History Lover in your life...21:29Libyan oil and the limits of Italian fleet expansionQ&A
- Bruships 173: Christmas Books for the History Lover in your life...1:47:10The wartime risk behind fitted-for-but-not-withQ&A
- Bruships 173: Christmas Books for the History Lover in your life...2:16:08Applying fitted-for-but-not-with to British carriersQ&A
- Bruships 173: Christmas Books for the History Lover in your life...3:28:57A County-hull scout carrier for the interwar Royal NavyQ&A
- Bruships 173: Christmas Books for the History Lover in your life...4:14:47The strongest cruiser designs of the 1930sQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 8: Beatty, Sopwith Cuckoos, Carriers & the Defence Debate...1:27:50How peacetime exchange helped Japan become a naval peerNotable Point
- Bruships 172: So the Historiophon Happened...3:15:02Treaty tonnage rewards submarine numbers over maximum sizeQ&A
- Bruships 172: So the Historiophon Happened...3:55:10Canadian Tigers could create a treaty battlecruiser categoryQ&A
- World of Warships Colab 1, Questions & U Class subs: Second 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 2/44:18:23How quickly might the Royal Navy reach 18-inch battleships?Q&A
- World of Warships Colab 1, Questions & U Class subs: Second 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 2/45:55:17Could Great Lakes yards build a Tillman battleship?Q&A
- World of Warships Colab 1, Questions & U Class subs: Second 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 2/46:19:36Why treaty tonnage favoured small U-class submarinesChapter
- World of Warships Colab 1, Questions & U Class subs: Second 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 2/47:01:41Why Pacific distances favoured larger submarinesNotable Point
- World of Warships Colab 1, Questions & U Class subs: Second 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 2/47:42:27What tonnage limits would a Tiger Cub treaty use?Q&A
- World of Warships Colab 1, Questions & U Class subs: Second 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 2/48:00:36What removing destroyer and submarine tonnage limits changesQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/47:27:45Treaty cruiser categories followed gun calibreQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/47:28:41A twelve-gun Bismarck would push King George V toward heavier weaponsQ&A
- Kido Butai spotted on december 4th 1941... 3 days before Pearl Harbour, what changes? Patreon 1082:19:04Naval treaties left room for more patrol supportQ&A
- Kido Butai spotted on december 4th 1941... 3 days before Pearl Harbour, what changes? Patreon 1082:49:28Why the Royal Navy wanted at least seventy cruisersQ&A
- The Battlecruiser/Fast Battleship Differential & Soviet Carriers: Scuttlebutt 71:18:23Why the Lion class would not simply mount larger gunsQ&A
- Ramblings Emergency Broadcast10:05Did naval treaties delay warship technology?Q&A
- Ramblings Emergency Broadcast1:45:19Why a naval-treaty roleplay needs historical incentivesQ&A
- Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax5:05:30A failed London treaty could revive the F3 battlecruiser conceptQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!2:28:59If the G3 battlecruisers reached serviceQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!3:08:40Why Japan wanted a seventy-percent treaty ratioQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!3:31:01Naval treaty holidays concealed technological progressQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!3:54:45Eight fast British capital ships rewrite the treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!4:24:37A fifteen-ship US battle line would rewrite the treaty-era balanceQ&A
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...1:51:29Hawkins as a 9.2-inch successorChapter
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...1:56:13A new treaty category for station cruisersChapter
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:02:50Why 9.2-inch guns remain the preferred batteryNotable Point
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:04:13An interwar race in carriers and station cruisersNotable Point
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:09:14Could Japan build both high-end cruisers and capital ships?Q&A
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:14:17Japanese convertible cruiser turretsNotable Point
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:14:58French and Italian allowances reshape the treaty balanceNotable Point
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:21:31How large would light cruisers become?Q&A
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:26:13Could carrier limits accelerate a dual-purpose 6-inch gun?Q&A
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:28:52Would alternate Nelsons keep 16-inch guns?Q&A
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:34:49Larger carrier allowances reshape Lexington and YorktownQ&A
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:39:42The Deutschland class loses its nicheNotable Point
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:58:24Would Britain still need a York-class equivalent?Q&A
- Battle of Santa Cruz: The Deathsong of Japanese Naval Aviation in WWII52:55Treaty labels and the roles of eight-inch cruisersNotable Point
- Fortress Heligoland: Britain doesn't give Heligoland to Germany in the 1890 Agreement... Patreon 1062:22:25Postwar consequences of a British HeligolandNotable Point
- Bruships 167: Tell me why, everything turned book – packing up, stacking up is all kalax want to do.2:44:16More durable displacement limits for naval arms controlQ&A
- Canals Never Built: What happens if Suez, Kiel or Panama are never built?9:06Why the forecast stops around 1925Notable Point
- Canals Never Built: What happens if Suez, Kiel or Panama are never built?28:06Separated fleets make naval limits harderNotable Point
- Canals Never Built: What happens if Suez, Kiel or Panama are never built?50:43Why a divided American fleet complicates treaty politicsNotable Point
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....1:24:24KGV turret rings and progressive upgunningQ&A
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....1:40:25How a speed race reshapes propulsion and treaty limitsNotable Point
- Bruships 165: I saw a Poodle with a Kalax Manual in his hand, walking through the moors of cornwall7:23Would early Libyan oil revive Italy's unfinished capital ships?Q&A
- Bruships 165: I saw a Poodle with a Kalax Manual in his hand, walking through the moors of cornwall56:36Britain abandons naval treaties in the late 1930sQ&A
- Bruships 165: I saw a Poodle with a Kalax Manual in his hand, walking through the moors of cornwall1:00:03An expanded Washington treaty and fleet balanceQ&A
- Bruships 165: I saw a Poodle with a Kalax Manual in his hand, walking through the moors of cornwall1:57:38Why navies did not always use their treaty tonnageQ&A
- Bruships 165: I saw a Poodle with a Kalax Manual in his hand, walking through the moors of cornwall2:02:32Hood-style 9.2-inch heavy cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 165: I saw a Poodle with a Kalax Manual in his hand, walking through the moors of cornwall2:25:40Super-cruiser loopholes in the Washington treatyQ&A
- Bruships 165: I saw a Poodle with a Kalax Manual in his hand, walking through the moors of cornwall2:33:00Would a neutral United States prevent the Second World War?Q&A
- Scuttlebutt 5: Some Tremendous Questions & Frustrations!20:34How larger treaty-free carriers would reshape air groupsQ&A
- Empire Prepares: What if the British Empire invested more in the 1920s & 30s7:30Three ways Britain could work within the naval treatiesChapter
- Empire Prepares: What if the British Empire invested more in the 1920s & 30s41:48The X1 as an imperial submersible gunboatNotable Point
- Empire Prepares: What if the British Empire invested more in the 1920s & 30s44:12Cruiser carriers built from County-class hullsChapter
- Empire Prepares: What if the British Empire invested more in the 1920s & 30s50:52HMS Unicorn and the auxiliary carrier categoryNotable Point
- Empire Prepares: What if the British Empire invested more in the 1920s & 30s54:58Cruiser-carrier squadrons and the next treatyNotable Point
- Empire Prepares: What if the British Empire invested more in the 1920s & 30s1:21:39Treaty-selective designs and conversion reservesChapter
- Empire Prepares: What if the British Empire invested more in the 1920s & 30s1:23:10Sloop speed limits and informal engineering practiceNotable Point
- Empire Prepares: What if the British Empire invested more in the 1920s & 30s1:25:08Designing sloop hulls for rapid destroyer conversionNotable Point
- Royal Navy Submarines vs Axis Warships: WWII in every theatre, Patreon Premier46:23Treaty submarine parity and confidence in ASDICNotable Point
- Bruships 160: Money for Kallax, Book Space ain’t Free! Naval History Questions & Chat...50:46If larger Renown-style battlecruisers reached JutlandQ&A
- Bruships 160: Money for Kallax, Book Space ain’t Free! Naval History Questions & Chat...1:41:41Why French naval parity with Germany would break the treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships 160: Money for Kallax, Book Space ain’t Free! Naval History Questions & Chat...2:32:30How the Anglo-German 35 percent naval ratio workedQ&A
- Bruships 160: Money for Kallax, Book Space ain’t Free! Naval History Questions & Chat...2:37:26A treaty system allowing slow capital-ship constructionQ&A
- War Experience Carriers: Taiho, Ticonderoga, Audacious, Midways & Maltas... a discussion5:25Cumulative treaty tonnage shaped carrier fleetsNotable Point
- War Experience Carriers: Taiho, Ticonderoga, Audacious, Midways & Maltas... a discussion30:04Midway and the cost of treaty limitsChapter
- War Experience Carriers: Taiho, Ticonderoga, Audacious, Midways & Maltas... a discussion35:30Why naval treaty compliance variedNotable Point
- War Experience Carriers: Taiho, Ticonderoga, Audacious, Midways & Maltas... a discussion48:24War experience reveals pre-war carrier aimsNotable Point
- War Experience Carriers: Taiho, Ticonderoga, Audacious, Midways & Maltas... a discussion50:52Removing cumulative limits: a carrier counterfactualNotable Point
- Check Campaign 27: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:42:46Could a harsher naval treaty have broken the challengers?Chapter
- Check Campaign 27: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:47:37Treaty limits need credible enforcementNotable Point
- Bruships 158: Home for Naval History Questions & Trialing the new Question Bot... so cross fingers!17:37Post-Washington capital ship design pathsQ&A
- Bruships 158: Home for Naval History Questions & Trialing the new Question Bot... so cross fingers!22:02Japan's Kaga-derived post-Washington battleshipNotable Point
- Bruships 158: Home for Naval History Questions & Trialing the new Question Bot... so cross fingers!33:35Larger Hawkins cruisers and treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 158: Home for Naval History Questions & Trialing the new Question Bot... so cross fingers!1:05:52A 22,000-ton treaty super-cruiser categoryQ&A
- Bruships 158: Home for Naval History Questions & Trialing the new Question Bot... so cross fingers!1:10:30Courageous as a 9.2-inch super-cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 158: Home for Naval History Questions & Trialing the new Question Bot... so cross fingers!3:25:43Capital-ship building capacity after a 1936 treaty collapseQ&A
- Sōryū/Hiryū Class… Breaking into the future? Key Ships Series 9, Ships 526:35Treaty weight and Fourth Fleet lessonsChapter
- Sōryū/Hiryū Class… Breaking into the future? Key Ships Series 9, Ships 537:32Treaty limits, paper ships, and design workaroundsNotable Point
- Check Campaign 24: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign30:19Could a historically constrained fleet win UAD?Q&A
- Scuttlebutt Three: Chatting with Drach, British War Plans and Lots of Carrier Stuff36:08Naval treaties and acceptable cheatingQ&A
- War Emergency Carriers of WWII... Lessons for future procurement?1:36Escort carriers were planned before the emergencyNotable Point
- War Emergency Carriers of WWII... Lessons for future procurement?6:45Carrier baselines before wartime shortcutsNotable Point
- Bruships 157: Books so good they've blown the budget on the #ScandiShip24 tour already!10:57Interwar destroyer tonnage and stabilityQ&A
- Bruships 157: Books so good they've blown the budget on the #ScandiShip24 tour already!1:13:46Why smaller fast battleships do not solve Japan's problemQ&A
- Bruships 157: Books so good they've blown the budget on the #ScandiShip24 tour already!2:00:31Treaty arithmetic made small carriers inefficientQ&A
- Bruships 157: Books so good they've blown the budget on the #ScandiShip24 tour already!2:03:01Why eight Hermes-class carriers change treaty arithmeticQ&A
- Fisher's Furious Flying off Ships: Courageous Class built as Aircraft Carriers59:19A carrier-heavy Royal Navy changes the postwar settlementChapter
- Fisher's Furious Flying off Ships: Courageous Class built as Aircraft Carriers1:07:10A mature carrier fleet breaks Washington treaty arithmeticChapter
- Fisher's Furious Flying off Ships: Courageous Class built as Aircraft Carriers1:15:31Treaties may invent three carrier categories earlyNotable Point
- Fisher's Furious Flying off Ships: Courageous Class built as Aircraft Carriers1:19:23Carrier categories spill into battlecruiser limitsNotable Point
- Fisher's Furious Flying off Ships: Courageous Class built as Aircraft Carriers1:24:28A 35,000-ton carrier ceiling drives bigger battleshipsNotable Point
- Why did the Royal Navy need a Forward Aviation Support Ship: Unicorn, the why, the how & the value!18:05Why Unicorn was not a remedy for small armored-carrier air groupsNotable Point
- Why did the Royal Navy need a Forward Aviation Support Ship: Unicorn, the why, the how & the value!20:54Royal Navy multi-carrier doctrine before the warNotable Point
- Why did the Royal Navy need a Forward Aviation Support Ship: Unicorn, the why, the how & the value!51:23What earlier Unicorn-type ships could have supportedNotable Point
- Bruships Gothenborg style...1:18:13Without the Scapa Flow scuttle, naval arms control becomes harderQ&A
- Bruships Gothenborg style...1:22:49Four Admiral-class battlecruisers would raise treaty limitsQ&A
- Kongōs at Jutland: IJN goes all or nothing in the North Sea in WWI... Patreon Premier 31:40:47A decisive Jutland could reshape alliances and naval treatiesChapter
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 317:09Second London Naval Treaty limits and escape routesChapter
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 329:43The 23,450-ton displacement paradoxChapter
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 335:30Reconstructing a 27,000-ton carrier from a broken treaty recordNotable Point
- Damage Control - The WWII Aircraft Carriers Edition; when it went wrong & when it went right2:10:27Treaty displacement limits and the known torpedo threatNotable Point
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?31:17Turbo-electric drives without naval treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?40:35Fast R-class battleships at JutlandQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?57:54Admiral-class carriers and the Washington treatyQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?1:00:05Larger destroyers under treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?1:11:40Eagle hangar height and carrier evolutionQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?4:14:32Cruiser submarines without treaty limitsQ&A
- What would the economic impact have been if the Naval Treaties hadn't happened? Patreon Premier 120:56Washington Treaty shock to shipyardsNotable Point
- What would the economic impact have been if the Naval Treaties hadn't happened? Patreon Premier 136:08Fleet choices without Washington limitsChapter
- What would the economic impact have been if the Naval Treaties hadn't happened? Patreon Premier 11:07:11London Treaty failure and Depression spendingChapter
- What would the economic impact have been if the Naval Treaties hadn't happened? Patreon Premier 11:13:29Japanese 18-inch ships as the triggerNotable Point
- What would the economic impact have been if the Naval Treaties hadn't happened? Patreon Premier 11:59:42Could stronger fleets deter or fragment a world war?Notable Point
- Scuttlebutt 2: H Class Battleships, Japanese Carrier Aircraft Design and lots more1:25:31Five fast Nelson-style ships in the Tillman treaty scenarioQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 2: H Class Battleships, Japanese Carrier Aircraft Design and lots more1:35:11Armoured carriers against land-based air powerNotable Point
- Carriers of the Planned War Fleets: How Shokaku, Implacables & Essexs reflect their Navys Doctrines0:26Planned-war carriers after the treaty systemChapter
- Carriers of the Planned War Fleets: How Shokaku, Implacables & Essexs reflect their Navys Doctrines25:31Treaty-free carrier size and growing aircraftNotable Point
- Mediterranean Convoy Runs Done Well: Operations Tiger, Splice & Rocket!1:03:00How interwar sloop production could have created wartime slackNotable Point
- IJN Doctrine in Carrier form... The Shōkaku class58:28Shipyard capacity limits carrier ambitionNotable Point
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!34:01Admiral and Hawkins treaty counterfactualQ&A
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!58:46London Treaty exit timingQ&A
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!1:35:51An Incomparable-sized carrier in treaty negotiationsQ&A
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!1:42:39Tiger-era 9.2-inch cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!1:46:27If the Queen Elizabeth class made only 21 knotsQ&A
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!3:31:50The interwar US-Royal-Japanese naval triangleQ&A
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!3:36:04Australia outside British Washington Treaty tonnageQ&A
- Naval History Live: Operations Tiger and Splice2:40:41Would France build Dunkerque without naval treaties?Q&A
- Bruships 152: Patreon July Premiers Announcement, Special Guests & Naval History Questions Answered1:50:07A mutually destructive Jutland and the postwar building raceQ&A
- Bruships 152: Patreon July Premiers Announcement, Special Guests & Naval History Questions Answered2:18:54K3/F3 speed and treaty consequencesQ&A
- Bruships 152: Patreon July Premiers Announcement, Special Guests & Naval History Questions Answered3:33:46Keeping older British battleships without naval treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 152: Patreon July Premiers Announcement, Special Guests & Naval History Questions Answered3:41:36Dominion cruiser programs and the London treaty balanceQ&A
- Kriegsmarine(Kaiserliche Marine)'s Nightmare Returns: The RN finds some 1910 Town Class in a couch!33:21Treaty freedom and unused yard capacityNotable Point
- USS Midway is it magic or surviable? Key Ships Series 9: Ship 14:51Midway as the US Navy's dream carrierNotable Point
- Patreon 104: What could have been learned if Billy Mitchell had followed the rules in 1921?2:10:03Bombing-test publicity and Washington treaty politicsNotable Point
- Patreon 104: What could have been learned if Billy Mitchell had followed the rules in 1921?2:14:42Mason Patrick restores command discipline after Project BChapter
- Lexington Class: The First Modern Carriers?2:22Treaty conversion preserves the Lexingtons' Pacific missionChapter
- Lexington Class: The First Modern Carriers?1:08:29A third Lexington conversion becomes a naval-architecture exerciseNotable Point
- Check Campaign 17: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign19:22Aircraft limits would freeze carrier developmentQ&A
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote1:07:16An 18-inch R class reshapes treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote1:11:11No-treaty Royal Navy renewalQ&A
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote1:33:48Replacing battlecruisers in a no-treaty fleetQ&A
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote1:40:14A postwar order without American belligerencyQ&A
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote1:42:28The fiscal case that Britain could afford the G3sNotable Point
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote3:04:59Why a larger fleet does not require giant auxiliariesQ&A
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote3:17:29Singapore failed through leadership and underinvestmentNotable Point
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote3:45:56Exploiting a treaty that excludes combat loadQ&A
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote4:01:45Why continuous battleship development favors radar gunneryQ&A
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote4:03:51Continuous building changes super-battleship riskNotable Point
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote4:10:23Why no treaty does not guarantee a balanced US fleetQ&A
- F8F Bearcat: Overshadowed Greatness - Key Aircraft Series 2 Aircraft 37:25Treaties also slowed carrier-aircraft developmentNotable Point
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion7:31Washington Treaty definitions and national carrier allowancesChapter
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion11:52Battlecarriers had to justify combining two fleet rolesNotable Point
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion32:30London Treaty rules squeeze useful small carriersNotable Point
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion36:45The London Treaty closes the Ryūjō loopholeNotable Point
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion38:49A separate light-carrier allowance could reshape fleet rolesNotable Point
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion43:08Treaty limits raise a deterrence problemNotable Point
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion56:57Sōryū and Hiryū test a paired-carrier island arrangementNotable Point
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion1:10:25The Second London Treaty frames the Illustrious compromiseChapter
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion1:23:32Larger carrier allowances could reduce design compromisesNotable Point
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion1:25:50A light-carrier category invites wider changes to treaty limitsNotable Point
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion1:28:09An early treaty collapse could permit a larger British carrierNotable Point
- Check Campaign 16: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:28:48Large Soviet destroyers and naval-treaty boundariesNotable Point
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off12:36No-treaty Royal Navy carrier developmentQ&A
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off30:11Twin-engine carrier aircraft timingQ&A
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off55:17Light carriers under Washington limitsQ&A
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off56:41No-treaty battle fleet deterrenceQ&A
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off1:12:12Light-cruiser limits beside a 15,000-ton HawkinsQ&A
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off1:13:55Capital-ship generations without treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off1:16:27The dubious appeal of a 10-inch treaty cruiser gunQ&A
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off1:40:55Dominion cruisers and treaty bargainingQ&A
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off3:54:02How twelve-gun British battleships reshape the arms raceQ&A
- The Drivers of the Evolution of Carrier Air Groups...2:33Did naval treaties drive carrier air group evolution?Q&A
- Musings on Deterrence0:22Deterrence before war startsChapter
- Striking First: The Development of US Carrier Naval Aviation Doctrine by War Gaming & Fleet Problems57:20Anglo-American shipbuilding follows qualitative competitionNotable Point
- Striking First: The Development of US Carrier Naval Aviation Doctrine by War Gaming & Fleet Problems1:04:23Treaty limits collide with large-carrier doctrineNotable Point
- Striking First: The Development of US Carrier Naval Aviation Doctrine by War Gaming & Fleet Problems1:11:20Ranger compresses a large air group into a treaty hullChapter
- Striking First: The Development of US Carrier Naval Aviation Doctrine by War Gaming & Fleet Problems1:29:41Yorktown turns first-strike doctrine into ship designChapter
- Striking First: The Development of US Carrier Naval Aviation Doctrine by War Gaming & Fleet Problems1:40:10Wargaming culture reinforces large US carriersChapter
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends33:29An eighteen-inch-gun naval treaty worldQ&A
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends52:05Ryujo and a cruiser-carrier treaty categoryQ&A
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends1:32:08How an Australian Encounter would set cruiser limitsQ&A
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends1:35:33Why light cruisers did not grow to the treaty maximumQ&A
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends1:55:03Why treaties chose a naval holidayQ&A
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends1:56:46Testing a 6:6:4:2:2 capital-ship ratioQ&A
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends3:42:38Cruiser types without the naval treatiesQ&A
- What the post WWI Navys really wanted from Aircraft Carriers: Hermes, Hōshō & Langley!0:54Postwar navies diverge from a shared carrier starting pointChapter
- What the post WWI Navys really wanted from Aircraft Carriers: Hermes, Hōshō & Langley!1:02:50Trade maps explain why Britain wants different carriersNotable Point
- What the post WWI Navys really wanted from Aircraft Carriers: Hermes, Hōshō & Langley!1:14:27Treaty tonnage limits close off a Hermes-style fleetChapter
- What the post WWI Navys really wanted from Aircraft Carriers: Hermes, Hōshō & Langley!1:20:06A larger Hawkins design reshapes the carrier treaty counterfactualChapter
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign12:10How a Tillman treaty fleet tightens blockade pressureQ&A
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign15:48Dunkerque, Richelieu, and France's two-theater problemQ&A
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:03:17Hawkins and cruiser treaty categoriesQ&A
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:07:20Treaty limits and self-escorting capital shipsNotable Point
- Bruships 148: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Begins14:43Eighteen-inch capital ships and Washington treaty pressureQ&A
- Bruships 148: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Begins47:33If Mogador set the London destroyer-leader limitQ&A
- Bruships 148: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Begins2:27:21Treaty tonnage for a Royal Navy three-fleet systemQ&A
- Bruships 148: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Begins3:59:08Gun caliber, pacific gestures, and battleship arms racesQ&A
- French Naval Aviation: A Quick Historical Overview & Introduction to it's Squadrons9:30Béarn, treaty constraints, and a missed carrier forceChapter
- Check Campaign 13: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:38:02Tillman linked political leverage to naval constructionNotable Point
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed3:54Why G3 and N3 break later battleship predictionsQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed55:15Carrier limits and the Implacable alternativeQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed1:05:37The minimum practical interwar fleet carrierQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed1:06:36Mass-producing County-class cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed1:25:39How a higher carrier floor changes treaty fleetsQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed1:48:37How naval treaties enabled the Ten Year RuleQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed2:41:15Why carriers adapt more easily when treaties collapseQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed2:55:22Royal Navy force structure without a treaty pauseQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed3:00:38Nine fast Queen Elizabeths and the Washington treatyQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed3:07:48British 9.2-inch cruisers without treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed3:34:38Ark Royal's treaty compromises and an Implacable alternativeQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed3:54:42Nelson and Rodney as a British treaty conditionQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed4:15:27A Washington treaty with two cruiser tiersQ&A
- The reality that the Marvel Shield Helicarriers Drew From: The USS Akron an Airship Aircraft Carrier1:48Why interwar navies built different kinds of carriersChapter
- The reality that the Marvel Shield Helicarriers Drew From: The USS Akron an Airship Aircraft Carrier7:26What if Akron and Macon had survived into the Second World War?Notable Point
- Patreon 101: If Lord Fisher died in Jan 1914, how does Prince Louis of Battenberg perform as 1SL?2:15:58Completing the Admiral class without repeated redesignNotable Point
- Patreon 101: If Lord Fisher died in Jan 1914, how does Prince Louis of Battenberg perform as 1SL?2:50:25How 18-inch fast battleships would reshape naval treatiesNotable Point
- Patreon 101: If Lord Fisher died in Jan 1914, how does Prince Louis of Battenberg perform as 1SL?3:03:54How a Coronel victory could reshape the Hawkins classNotable Point
- Patreon 101: If Lord Fisher died in Jan 1914, how does Prince Louis of Battenberg perform as 1SL?3:12:09What follows if the N3 and G3 designs are built?Q&A
- Suggest Series Name Please: Comment Response video with a twist10:21Why battleship turret count affected survivabilityQ&A
- Conception, Operation & Conclusion of Atlantic Conveyor & other rapid conversions44:45Why Britain did not order escort carriers before warNotable Point
- Conception, Operation & Conclusion of Atlantic Conveyor & other rapid conversions1:12:27Alliances do not replace national capabilitiesChapter
- Conception, Operation & Conclusion of Atlantic Conveyor & other rapid conversions1:19:08Why aviation conversions recurred across three warsNotable Point
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built1:39:49What fictional Australian super-cruisers would changeQ&A
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built1:41:24What a British Coast Guard sloop force could have contributedQ&A
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built1:54:53Why treaty pressure produced the Crown Colony cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built2:21:56Why later US carriers left Lexington's electric drive behindQ&A
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built4:44:57The Royal Navy's unofficial capital-ship requirementQ&A
- USS Akron; The World's First Purpose Built Flying Aircraft Carrier16:47Would an airship carrier count under the treaties?Q&A
- The Furious Age: The First Aircraft Carriers1:25:12Treaties keep experimental carriers in serviceNotable Point
- Check Campaign 11: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign15:15How treaty escalation clauses opened the way to larger cruisersNotable Point
- Check Campaign 11: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:11:36Treaty compliance and naval creative accountingNotable Point
- Bruships 145: Naval History Questions Answered & Will it be lego building or book boxing?48:36What continuous cruiser construction failed to carry forwardQ&A
- Bruships 145: Naval History Questions Answered & Will it be lego building or book boxing?1:42:32Treaty limits shaped the Crown Colony cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 145: Naval History Questions Answered & Will it be lego building or book boxing?1:57:31How large might capital ships have grown without treaties?Q&A
- Bruships 145: Naval History Questions Answered & Will it be lego building or book boxing?2:36:58How an unlimited destroyer allowance reshapes the Royal NavyQ&A
- Bruships 145: Naval History Questions Answered & Will it be lego building or book boxing?5:07:49Could monitors and coastal batteries evade the 16-inch limit?Q&A
- Imperial Star Destroyers if designed by the World's Major Navys in 193844:40Dunkerque under treaty and infrastructure constraintsChapter
- Bruships 144: Some Books(Can't Find Lego Cam Sorry) & Naval History Questions27:05What 27,000 tons could give a treaty carrierQ&A
- Bruships 144: Some Books(Can't Find Lego Cam Sorry) & Naval History Questions1:02:36How a 14,000-ton cruiser limit changes interwar fleetsQ&A
- Bruships 144: Some Books(Can't Find Lego Cam Sorry) & Naval History Questions2:01:53Why dividing the High Seas Fleet would be a diplomatic nightmareQ&A
- Bruships 144: Some Books(Can't Find Lego Cam Sorry) & Naval History Questions3:09:48Where treaty politics would permit 18-inch coastal gunsQ&A
- Bruships 144: Some Books(Can't Find Lego Cam Sorry) & Naval History Questions3:24:21Why equal treaty limits push battleships toward convergenceQ&A
- The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!0:25Why treaty collapse is the baselineNotable Point
- The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!2:25Conference politics under the Great DepressionNotable Point
- The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!20:33Why Stalin might enter the London Naval ConferenceChapter
- The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!26:52Project 21 and Stalin's minimum battleship demandNotable Point
- The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!30:01Cruisers as the empire's presence fleetNotable Point
- The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!34:48The London treaty's existing fault linesChapter
- The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!37:57Destroyer leaders as substitutes for scarce cruisersNotable Point
- The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!41:36Why four Soviet fleets require twelve capital shipsNotable Point
- The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!44:41Capital-ship ratios for a six-power treatyNotable Point
- The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!47:30Soviet entry doubles the proposed carrier allowancesNotable Point
- The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!51:34Larger cruiser allowances still leave Britain shortNotable Point
- The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!53:20Larger allowances and nine-ship Tribal flotillasNotable Point
- The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!54:19Submarine tonnage as Stalin's treaty concessionNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Forgotten Lost Battleship Generation: Key Ship Series 8 - Ships 60:00The treaty uncertainty behind a forgotten battleship generationChapter
- The Royal Navy's Forgotten Lost Battleship Generation: Key Ship Series 8 - Ships 627:06Design 16A favors twin-turret survivability at treaty displacementChapter
- The Royal Navy's Forgotten Lost Battleship Generation: Key Ship Series 8 - Ships 637:32Small-gun treaty battleships face a fatal mismatchChapter
- The Royal Navy's Forgotten Lost Battleship Generation: Key Ship Series 8 - Ships 639:18Air-power treaties reveal the limits of arms controlNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Forgotten Lost Battleship Generation: Key Ship Series 8 - Ships 644:49Small battleship studies as a political exerciseNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Forgotten Lost Battleship Generation: Key Ship Series 8 - Ships 646:00Design 12L hints at a fast battleship fallbackNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Forgotten Lost Battleship Generation: Key Ship Series 8 - Ships 647:28Renewed escalation dooms the small treaty battleshipsNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Forgotten Lost Battleship Generation: Key Ship Series 8 - Ships 61:00:14Treaty collapse may still produce one restrained generationNotable Point
- Patreon 99: What would Imperial Star Destroyers look if designed by 1938 USN, RN, KM, IJN, RM & SN?1:54:27Why French fleet design depended on British strategic supportNotable Point
- Patreon 99: What would Imperial Star Destroyers look if designed by 1938 USN, RN, KM, IJN, RM & SN?2:05:23A 15-inch/50 alternative to Nelson's 16-inch batteryNotable Point
- Patreon 99: What would Imperial Star Destroyers look if designed by 1938 USN, RN, KM, IJN, RM & SN?2:11:20Treaty escalation and interrupted British capital-ship constructionNotable Point
- Patreon 99: What would Imperial Star Destroyers look if designed by 1938 USN, RN, KM, IJN, RM & SN?2:56:26How a later Wall Street Crash could alter naval treaty politicsQ&A
- Patreon 99: What would Imperial Star Destroyers look if designed by 1938 USN, RN, KM, IJN, RM & SN?2:57:31An economic crash during naval-treaty negotiationsQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered29:33County-class cruiser design depends on treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered1:01:34Converting Hood under the treaty disadvantages every navyQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered1:04:27A bilateral treaty cannot isolate Britain's global naval raceQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered1:06:14Without Washington, Britain keeps ordering capital shipsQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered1:34:43Monitors sit outside the main treaty strength contestQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered1:35:32Multiple 18-inch British ships rewrite the treaty ceilingQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered1:40:09Naval treaty policy was a cross-party choiceQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered2:20:30Italy could answer Alsace before the French laid it downQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered3:54:22The treaty allowance could favor Renown-class carrier conversionsQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered4:07:35A higher cruiser limit produces a 22,000-25,000-ton Des MoinesQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered4:25:44Large dockyards and G3 carriers accelerate British naval aviationQ&A
- Fairey Fulmar: innate soundness and competence but not the stuff of headlines1:04:24Tracking Bismarck and the Royal Navy's carrier tradeoffChapter
- Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London33:42Why accept tonnage limits at all?Q&A
- Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London52:29The historical ratios define the bargaining spaceChapter
- Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London1:04:25Why Sweden still stays outside the treatyQ&A
- Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London2:57:06Prewar treaty practice could shape postwar arms controlNotable Point
- Check Campaign 9: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign54:19A treaty-survival scenario links ship design to interwar policyNotable Point
- Giulio Cesare: The Lucky Ceasar of the Regia Marina, Key Ships Series 8 – Ship 51:05:25The Conte di Cavours and Italian treaty equality with FranceChapter
- Giulio Cesare: The Lucky Ceasar of the Regia Marina, Key Ships Series 8 – Ship 51:09:41How Italy assembled its Washington treaty tonnage claimNotable Point
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books59:03How the Anglo-German agreement counted the PanzerschiffeQ&A
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books1:01:46A simpler design for restarting Soviet battleship constructionNotable Point
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books1:17:12Who benefits from larger treaty destroyersQ&A
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books2:47:37Where naval alternate history becomes fictionNotable Point
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books3:59:02Why cruiser-carriers remain poor compromisesQ&A
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books4:07:01How larger destroyer limits enlarge Hunts and sloopsQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered45:03An Austro-Hungarian navy after World War IQ&A
- The Last Invasion of Britain: Battle of Fishguard(1797)2:39:16Would France and Italy accept larger treaty cruisers?Q&A
- The Last Invasion of Britain: Battle of Fishguard(1797)2:52:36A completed Tillman III reshapes the battleship raceNotable Point
- HMS Furious: Finding Virtue and Utility in Evolution22:44How a 1918 harbor strike could reshape naval strategyNotable Point
- Check Campaign 8: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign48:18The campaign fleet ignores Washington treaty limitsNotable Point
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!11:21Why the interwar Royal Navy stopped short of 18-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!14:56A 3,000-ton Tribal-class destroyer leaderQ&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!59:51A fifth Iron Duke adds firepower and treaty leverageQ&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!1:39:45Overage Hawkins-class cruisers could become anti-aircraft shipsQ&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!2:05:45Coastal superguns could become a naval-treaty loopholeQ&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!2:20:55An 18-inch treaty standard could push Japan toward 20- or 22-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!2:22:53K2 and K3 were formidable designs rather than a final practical limitQ&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!2:47:58Larger treaty ships make Scharnhorst's North Cape position worseQ&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!4:05:30A 9.2-inch Exeter would face stronger Japanese treaty cruisers tooQ&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!4:20:11Deutschland had no easy displacement left for more speedQ&A
- Europa & Giuseppe Miraglia: The Regia Marina's Love for Seaplane Carriers19:26Parity with Italy traps French naval planningNotable Point
- Europa & Giuseppe Miraglia: The Regia Marina's Love for Seaplane Carriers19:26Mediterranean geography weakened the carrier caseChapter
- Europa & Giuseppe Miraglia: The Regia Marina's Love for Seaplane Carriers44:28Reconnaissance without surrendering naval controlChapter
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered29:22How British destroyers might grow without treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered2:01:37How Soviet parity could destabilize the London treatyNotable Point
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered3:24:22Why larger treaty allowances may preserve the naval balanceQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!7:25Why Soviet participation could destabilize the London Naval TreatyNotable Point
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!50:22How Versailles and the Anglo-German Naval Agreement constrained GermanyQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!1:53:00When larger capital ships would force British dock expansionQ&A
- Racking up the Fight Back: American Carrier raids of 194257:30Would the US Navy have kept turbo-electric propulsion?Q&A
- Racking up the Fight Back: American Carrier raids of 19421:19:20Could Ranger and Wasp have been traded for another Yorktown?Q&A
- British Naval Aviation Doctrine during the 1920s & 30s: it's Context & Development2:23:21Treaty pressure turns one ideal into carrier tiersNotable Point
- The HMS Ark Royals Saga: A History of Naval Aviation in a Name...32:42Treaty limits constrained Ark Royal's ideal designNotable Point
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered48:49What navies would do with a 15,000-ton cruiser limitQ&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered56:05An 8,000-ton, 6-inch treaty cruiser standardQ&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered1:21:19The tradeoffs in 12,500- and 15,000-ton treaty cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered2:34:50How four Ryūjō-class carriers could change treaty categoriesQ&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered3:23:53Royal Navy carriers after a Japanese treaty exitQ&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered3:32:54Mission and treaty constraints on a British large cruiserQ&A
- Patreon 95: Helios on Route- A lucky development of helicopters & appropriate tech in 1930s34:28The treaty-era aviation cruiserChapter
- Patreon 95: Helios on Route- A lucky development of helicopters & appropriate tech in 1930s52:51Treaty law decides whether helicopter carriers countNotable Point
- Patreon 95: Helios on Route- A lucky development of helicopters & appropriate tech in 1930s1:24:29Larger hangars change carrier treaty bargainingNotable Point
- Patreon 95: Helios on Route- A lucky development of helicopters & appropriate tech in 1930s1:48:42Could HMS Eagle become a helicopter assault ship?Q&A
- Patreon 95: Helios on Route- A lucky development of helicopters & appropriate tech in 1930s2:44:03Treaty limits make destroyer helicopters unlikelyQ&A
- Naval History Writing Competition 2023/202416:56How Admiral-class carriers would reshape treaty tonnageNotable Point
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time22:56Canadian and Australian Counties could multiply the imperial cruiser forceQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time48:57A two-calibre treaty forces every navy into awkward compromisesQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time2:54:43A 10,000-ton cruiser trades speed directly against armourQ&A
- Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō12:16The treaty loophole behind small carriersChapter
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books3:49:41How one navy leaving the treaty system affects everyoneQ&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books3:50:50Why treaties ended the armored-cruiser successorQ&A
- Old Crocks at War: The Value of Reserve Ships to Navys in WWI6:02Why modern naval thinking discounts reserve shipsNotable Point
- Old Crocks at War: The Value of Reserve Ships to Navys in WWI34:28Presence duties and the World War II reserve shortfallNotable Point
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!25:54Forty County-class cruisers and the treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:05:13Why European rivals did not simply outgun NelsonQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:18:14Could a triple-turret Tiger survive into World War II?Q&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:36:28Britain's post-treaty heavy-cruiser studiesQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:50:04Treaties and the survival of British shipyardsQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:26:54American expectations for total cruiser-tonnage limitsQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:59:59Would the Royal Navy coin 'heavy cruiser' without treaties?Q&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:40:55The 8-inch gun as a treaty compromiseQ&A
- What Happens If Whittle is supported & Britain develops Jet Engines + Gas Turbines in 1930s0:23How the Admiralty could have rescued Whittle's jet proposalChapter
- What Happens If Whittle is supported & Britain develops Jet Engines + Gas Turbines in 1930s23:22Gas turbines turn machinery weight into treaty tonnageNotable Point
- What Happens If Whittle is supported & Britain develops Jet Engines + Gas Turbines in 1930s36:23What turbine weight savings could do for IllustriousNotable Point
- What Happens If Whittle is supported & Britain develops Jet Engines + Gas Turbines in 1930s54:12Gas turbines could ease the Crown Colony class's tonnage constraintNotable Point
- Sloops Adaptability of Presence40:18Treaty rules leave room for adaptable sloopsChapter
- Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:19:28The most influential admiral depends on the causal chain being measuredQ&A
- Patreon 92: Frank Whittle is given consistent funding by Britain to develop jet engines from 192824:45Why eliminating boilers changes treaty warship designNotable Point
- Patreon 92: Frank Whittle is given consistent funding by Britain to develop jet engines from 192827:57Gas turbines change the King George V design without changing the treatyChapter
- Patreon 92: Frank Whittle is given consistent funding by Britain to develop jet engines from 19281:24:55Faster Belfast and Edinburgh under treaty limitsChapter
- Patreon 92: Frank Whittle is given consistent funding by Britain to develop jet engines from 19282:21:17Why treaty rules cannot neatly contain Britain's turbine leadNotable Point
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History50:38British battleship autoloader concepts from F2 to King George VChapter
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History1:00:20Three rounds per minute could transform a treaty battleshipNotable Point
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History1:51:17Six-inch versus eight-inch autoloader ammunition logisticsChapter
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History2:07:13Did ammunition count toward treaty displacement?Q&A
- USS Enterprise: A Star is Born - KSS3 S4 Comment Response0:51Why Ranger and Wasp remained experimental carriersQ&A
- USS Enterprise: A Star is Born - KSS3 S4 Comment Response14:19Yorktown-class growth margins and treaty tonnageQ&A
- USS Enterprise: A Star is Born - KSS3 S4 Comment Response20:42Why Germany needed a short war against stronger coalitionsNotable Point
- If Not Pearl Harbor: Other Options for Japanese Suprise Strike11:16The Falklands comparison and Japan's blue-water reachNotable Point
- Naval Historian Reacts to Aircraft Carriers the Debate Part 2 of 21:20:20Audacious as the unrestricted carrier idealChapter
- Naval Historian Reacts to Aircraft Carriers the Debate Part 2 of 21:36:25Treaty tonnage and global fleet numbersNotable Point
- Tillman Class: Dreams of Super Battleships - KSS2 S8 Comment Response18:28A super-battleship treaty makes German rearmament harderNotable Point
- Naval Historian Reacts to Aircraft Carriers the Debate: Part 1 of 21:44How treaty limits divided British carrier rolesChapter
- Naval Historian Reacts to Aircraft Carriers the Debate: Part 1 of 25:16Why Britain did not simply build more strike carriersQ&A
- Naval Historian Reacts to Aircraft Carriers the Debate: Part 1 of 21:49:56Continuous strikes shaped the Illustrious classNotable Point
- Scharnhorst Class(1936): Most Valued Player of the German Capital Ships - Key Ships Series 7 Ship 444:46Dunkerque pushed Scharnhorst toward a third turretNotable Point
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out1:16:44H3's six-gun battery weakened its treaty-design appealQ&A
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out1:46:21A 16.5-inch treaty limit could carry G3 gun work into the Lion classQ&A
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out2:35:28Treaty heavy cruisers were defined by guns and a maximumQ&A
- Graf Zeppelin: KSS2 S1 Comment Response20:31How British practice shaped naval treaty rulesQ&A
- Operation Berlin: Tour De Force or Tour De Farce?8:31A large navy can pursue several doctrines at onceNotable Point
- Bruships 131: Battleships...1:45:17How autoloaders could reshape treaty cruisersQ&A
- Dante Alighieri: Not Dreadnought but still an Inferno - Key Ships Series 7, Ship 128:44Why Italy discarded Dante Alighieri in 1928Chapter
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy2:40:31Treaty tonnage met production economicsChapter
- HMVS Cerberus: KSS1 S4 Comment Response11:40Completed G3 and N3 ships reshape treaty bargainingNotable Point
- Bruships 130: Battleships1:01:55How naval treaties constrained non-signatory small naviesQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships1:10:42Cruiser categories without treaty tonnage ceilingsQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships1:26:57Could HMS Hood have been preserved in concrete?Q&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships1:43:53Why extra old cruisers do not postpone British replacementQ&A
- What Happens if 1930s Germany Standardises on the Scharnhorst hull for Capital Ships & Carriers?1:51:04Why naval treaties need legitimacy, not just limitsNotable Point
- HMS Dreadnought: Key Ship Series 1 Ship 1 Comment Response56:27Oil firing and an alternate fast-battleship fleetQ&A
- Bruships 129: Travels, Rememberance & Questions from Chat23:40If Japanese delegates exposed US eavesdroppingQ&A
- Bruships 129: Travels, Rememberance & Questions from Chat35:09Carrier limits, total tonnage, and Royal Navy numbersQ&A
- Bruships 129: Travels, Rememberance & Questions from Chat50:08Carrier conversions without naval treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 129: Travels, Rememberance & Questions from Chat53:38Why naval treaty tonnage was hard to enforceQ&A
- Bruships 129: Travels, Rememberance & Questions from Chat1:04:07A Soviet allocation in the 1930s naval treatiesQ&A
- Town Class(1936): Building for Presence - Key Ships Reserve Series, Ship 214:04Treaty limits reshaped the Town into the Crown Colony classNotable Point
- The Sydney Strategy: What if the British Empire Far East Base was Sydney not Singapore24:00Jellicoe linked the Far East base to imperial consultationChapter
- The Sydney Strategy: What if the British Empire Far East Base was Sydney not Singapore1:10:21Sydney endurance requirements could change the King George V classChapter
- Patreon 88: Sydney Strategy: When looking for a Far East Naval Base - what if Sydney not Singapore?59:43Treaty accusations masked a dispute over spending prioritiesNotable Point
- Patreon 88: Sydney Strategy: When looking for a Far East Naval Base - what if Sydney not Singapore?1:37:28How treaty accounting could conceal extra fuel capacityNotable Point
- Patreon 88: Sydney Strategy: When looking for a Far East Naval Base - what if Sydney not Singapore?2:40:10Who loses from a 24,500-ton carrier limit?Q&A
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare46:32A separate treaty limit for heavy cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare1:45:57Why a Coast Guard label cannot hide a capital shipQ&A
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare3:16:59Bringing Lexington under treaty tonnage during constructionQ&A
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases1:06:06Without treaty categories, heavy cruisers might remain armoured cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases1:10:44Tokyo lacked the leverage to host the naval treaty talksQ&A
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases1:29:32Extra tonnage only helps Ryujo if designers resist filling itQ&A
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases1:56:30Per-ship limits encourage every navy to build to the ceilingQ&A
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases3:43:11Treaties need security as well as limitsNotable Point
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases4:14:38Courageous had the guns, but Renown was the ship Britain neededQ&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty5:34Why battlecruisers need a separate treaty categoryChapter
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty22:14Carrier limits, ratios, and the conversion exceptionNotable Point
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty36:02Why the alternate treaty does not cap battleship speedQ&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty39:03Why France and Italy choose battleships over battlecruisersNotable Point
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty1:44:32Why Japan keeps the Kongōs instead of converting themQ&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty1:47:34Which navy's submarines suffered most under treaty limitsQ&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty1:48:56Treaty pressure and Japan's top-heavy destroyersQ&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty2:36:42A London treaty built around replacement, not a holidayNotable Point
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty3:08:35A less insecure Japan may stay in the treaty systemNotable Point
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 1039:30The counterfactual case for fast 9.2-inch Royal Navy cruisersChapter
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 103:49:12The Washington Naval Treaty as a narrow diplomatic successNotable Point
- Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series21:26Capital ships without treaty restraintQ&A
- Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series31:36Japan's treaty choice would not solve its structureQ&A
- Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series1:25:45A treaty-free navy still needs a middle cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series1:44:05A surviving Russian Empire at the Washington conferenceQ&A
- Why WWII evolved Motor Torpedo Boats in Motor Gun Boats: Pacific, Black Sea & Baltic Designs59:17Japan's torpedo-boat line met the Pacific badlyChapter
- HMS Lord Nelson(1906): Britain's Last Soverign Style Battleship - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 59:37A treaty-era replacement path for old battleshipsNotable Point
- How & Why during WWII Motor Torpedo Boats(MTBs) became Motor Gun Boats(MGBs): Pacific Theatre1:11:17Japan's pursuit of destroyer-killing torpedo boatsChapter
- HMS Formidable(1898): Lessons of a Highly Conventional Carreer - Key Ship Series 6, Ship 41:04:09Could naval treaties have preserved sovereign battleships?Notable Point
- Ranging & Stabilising: How Gunnery Evolved from 1860 to 196051:45Effective range could matter more than maximum rangeNotable Point
- Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics33:20Trading treaty displacement for a third shaftNotable Point
- Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics1:14:54How naval treaties constrained deterrenceQ&A
- Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics1:19:38How a larger treaty limit would reshape YamatoQ&A
- Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics3:16:55Britain's likely heavy- and light-cruiser path without treatiesQ&A
- How & Why during WWII MTBs became MGBs: European & Mediterranean Theatre9:43Why a larger torpedo boat was hard to justifyQ&A
- Bruships: Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!54:26What Britain might build after the County classQ&A
- The Hunt Class: The WWII Royal Navy's Escort Destroyers - Key Ship Series 6, Ship 325:10Hunt and Egret machinery raise a treaty-speed questionNotable Point
- Naval History Questions Live... with Irn Bru... which is a scottish soft drink... not fizzy whisky!32:39Why the Anglo-Japanese Alliance would not cause an Anglo-American warQ&A
- USS North Dakota(BB-29): The USN's First True Dreadnought - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 830:45Malta and the constraints on a global US NavyNotable Point
- King George V(1911) Class: Why the Orion Class didn't stick as 'Super Dreadnoughts'25:13Treaty-era presence missions and worldwide serviceChapter
- King George V(1911) Class: Why the Orion Class didn't stick as 'Super Dreadnoughts'35:34Could an 'overage' category have preserved older capital ships?Notable Point
- Malta Class: Once more the Royal Navy building for the After War? - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 23:08Treaty limits and the Royal Navy's ideal carrierChapter
- Malta Class: Once more the Royal Navy building for the After War? - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 28:33Unrestricted carriers versus global fleet numbersNotable Point
- From Beavers to Ersatz Monarchs & Francesco Caracciolos1:24:26Why more treaty cruisers would not guarantee a stronger River Plate forceQ&A
- From Beavers to Ersatz Monarchs & Francesco Caracciolos1:26:46A fast Royal Navy treaty-capital-ship responseChapter
- From Beavers to Ersatz Monarchs & Francesco Caracciolos1:45:43Turning a game-heavy armour scheme into a plausible treaty designNotable Point
- Bruships 122: Patreon Special - how wooden ships between 1700 to 1860 are built13:47Which cancelled battlecruisers mattered most?Q&A
- Bruships 122: Patreon Special - how wooden ships between 1700 to 1860 are built57:48A Royal Navy return to 9.2-inch cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 122: Patreon Special - how wooden ships between 1700 to 1860 are built2:46:10Why Britain preferred more medium carriersQ&A
- Bruships 122: Patreon Special - how wooden ships between 1700 to 1860 are built2:56:11Treaty ratios for an unaligned Pacific naval powerQ&A
- Ersatz Monarch Class: Pebbles casting Ripples can lead to Tsunamis - Key Ship Series 4, Episode 1032:51How a modest design could reshape later treaty politicsChapter
- Battleships of the Treaty Era0:00Why few ships were truly treaty battleshipsNotable Point
- Battleships of the Treaty Era1:35Why a naval treaty needs shared incentivesChapter
- Battleships of the Treaty Era9:34Treaty fears and the naval-race explanationNotable Point
- Battleships of the Treaty Era52:21Littorios and Italy’s treaty advantageChapter
- Battleships of the Treaty Era1:08:25Japan links a 14-inch ceiling to numerical parityNotable Point
- Battleships of the Treaty Era1:14:39Why treaty controls broke downChapter
- Battleships of the Treaty Era1:22:04Could rolling quotas have saved the treaty system?Notable Point
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!7:15Why Britain was essential to naval treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!9:16How a twelve-gun Hood would reset treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!14:25How Enterprise could be reconciled with carrier limitsQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!31:20How naval treaties classified warshipsQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!34:54What it would take to turn Tiger into a heavy cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!1:41:45What Japan could replace after the Kantō earthquakeQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!1:42:09How fast French and Italian ships could reshape Britain's treaty fleetQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!1:58:41Which dominion would receive a treaty battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!2:13:27Why fast battleships displaced specialized battlecruisersQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!2:18:43How stored belt armour might evade treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!2:23:17If treaties separated battleships and battlecruisersQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!2:29:55How Italy might spend an eight-ship treaty allowanceQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!3:27:13Why the Royal Navy needed more, smaller carriersQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!3:34:48Why a practical fleet carrier needed more than 10,000 tonsQ&A
- H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 449:19The Royal Navy's three-theatre nightmareNotable Point
- H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 454:39Would an early H-39 programme change Allied construction?Q&A
- Dominating the World from Second Place: Alfred Von Tirpitz & his 'Risk Fleet' Theory3:46Alliance equality constrained German and British freedomNotable Point
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer21:19Carrier treaty tonnage versus Royal Navy hull numbersQ&A
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer25:47How permissive destroyer limits would enlarge every navy's designsQ&A
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer35:09Treaty escalation after an unexpected warshipQ&A
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer1:10:33Why Britain would build heavy cruisers before the 1930 treatyQ&A
- Sovetsky Soyuz (Советский Союз) Class: Stalin's Battleship Dreams - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 332:22How unfinished battleships could still influence strategyNotable Point
- Sovetsky Soyuz (Советский Союз) Class: Stalin's Battleship Dreams - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 355:29Could foreign yards have jump-started the Soviet battle fleet?Notable Point
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 21:26:00Why naval treaties imposed capital-ship limitsNotable Point
- Testing out Lion Class & Potential Lion Class Successors on UAD26:39Why Nelson and Rodney look so unusualQ&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy23:21Treaty ratios can trigger a construction raceQ&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy49:52Treaty compliance often depended on creative accountingNotable Point
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy51:50Why one Ark Royal was not simply multipliedQ&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy55:22Autoloaders would distort the next treaty negotiationQ&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy2:39:15An 18-inch treaty baseline would reshape cruiser limitsQ&A
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?1:50Could an unmodified Admiral-class ship have remained useful?Q&A
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?8:23Why refit the Kongō class rather than scrap it?Q&A
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?58:02How naval treaties handled an accidental battleship lossQ&A
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?1:24:29Cruiser development without interwar size limitsQ&A
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?1:39:38Theodore Roosevelt and a less restrictive naval treatyQ&A
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?2:14:04Designing treaty ships for rapid wartime completionQ&A
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?4:31:16A nominally treaty-compliant Japanese successor to YamatoQ&A
- Some Myths of the Royal Navy in WWII & Treaty Years6:21Treaty strength and Churchill's construction pauseNotable Point
- Some Myths of the Royal Navy in WWII & Treaty Years50:07How treaty sloops preserved escort design capacityNotable Point
- Patreon 80: The most annoying & damaging 'myths' about the Royal Navy in the Treaty Years & WWII?1:04:52Could Britain have chosen two G3s instead of Nelson and Rodney?Q&A
- Bruships 116: Australia Trip Books... Continued21:20A separate treaty allowance for light carriersQ&A
- Bruships 116: Australia Trip Books... Continued3:27:51Treaty replacement priorities for British capital shipsQ&A
- Inglorious 6th of July: Battle of Grenada(1779) & Battle of Algeciras(1801)3:03:56Britain's submarine-ban campaign concealed a strategic tradeoffQ&A
- Inglorious 6th of July: Battle of Grenada(1779) & Battle of Algeciras(1801)3:32:59Converting new capital ships into carriers reshapes every fleetQ&A
- Inglorious 6th of July: Battle of Grenada(1779) & Battle of Algeciras(1801)3:42:35Without treaties, battleships could pass 100,000 tonsQ&A
- Lexington & Saratoga Carrier Conception: Key Ship Series 3, Ships 10 &1111:12Treaty limits did not require eight-inch gunsChapter
- HMS Ark Royal(1937): Key Ships Series 3, Ship 912:00Ark Royal as the fleet's alpha-strike carrierChapter
- HMS Ark Royal(1937): Key Ships Series 3, Ship 946:31The torpedo hit and Ark Royal's accelerating listChapter
- Bruships 115: Hopefully Australia Trip in Summary!2:27:21Retained battlecruisers would support a three-fleet Royal NavyQ&A
- Bruships 115: Hopefully Australia Trip in Summary!3:16:53A third Renown could reshape British wartime deploymentsQ&A
- HMS Illustrious: Key Ships Series 3, Ship 716:47The treaty compromise in Illustrious's designChapter
- HMS Illustrious: Key Ships Series 3, Ship 71:43:58Treaty limits and the path to the supercarrierNotable Point
- USS Enterprise (CV6): Key Ship Series 3, Ship 44:47Displacement growth and treaty figuresNotable Point
- USS Enterprise (CV6): Key Ship Series 3, Ship 416:01From Yorktown to the Midway classNotable Point
- Stalins Dream Fleets & the Potential Responses25:24A Soviet buildup as a trigger for naval rearmamentNotable Point
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells; Alternate History, Jutland if Royal Navy Shells Work extended editon2:05:33How fast battleships could complicate the postwar balanceChapter
- Bruships 114: Alternate Histories, What Ifs & Questions from Chat33:00How a treaty might distinguish battlecruisersQ&A
- Bruships 114: Alternate Histories, What Ifs & Questions from Chat48:19When experimental carriers force treaty definitions to changeQ&A
- Bruships 114: Alternate Histories, What Ifs & Questions from Chat1:20:23How a 20-inch-gunned Hood could break treaty negotiationsQ&A
- Bruships 114: Alternate Histories, What Ifs & Questions from Chat2:40:38What a 10,000-ton treaty submarine might becomeQ&A
- An Imperial Navy start... this can not end well...3:30:03How treaty limits constrained capital-ship test bedsNotable Point
- Bruships 113: Jutland7:00Why widespread warship sales would wreck the treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships 113: Jutland34:17Britain's leverage over London Treaty cruiser rulesQ&A
- Bruships 113: Jutland34:39How larger British guns could reshape treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 113: Jutland1:28:43Why Dominion fleets counted with the Royal NavyQ&A
- Bruships 113: Jutland2:50:12What a larger interwar Royal Navy could deployQ&A
- Francesco Caracciolo Class Battleships: Key Ships Series 2, Ship 60:29Why the Caracciolos could have changed naval planningChapter
- Francesco Caracciolo Class Battleships: Key Ships Series 2, Ship 610:19Could treaty navies race for fast battleships?Notable Point
- Francesco Caracciolo Class Battleships: Key Ships Series 2, Ship 616:51How Italian speed could ripple through three fleetsChapter
- Building a NelRod County Class...1:08:00Imperial warship transfers and American treaty fearsQ&A
- Bruships 112: Julian Corbett10:16What a 10,000-ton British heavy cruiser could carryQ&A
- Bruships 112: Julian Corbett1:12:00Why the Deutschlands retained 11-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 112: Julian Corbett1:38:43Why treaty battleships used three turretsQ&A
- What were the 'Bearns' of the other Major Navies? RM, IJN, USN, RN & Kreigsmarine11:44What makes a warship a Bearn?Chapter
- What were the 'Bearns' of the other Major Navies? RM, IJN, USN, RN & Kreigsmarine45:25Fubuki firepower versus stabilityNotable Point
- What were the 'Bearns' of the other Major Navies? RM, IJN, USN, RN & Kreigsmarine50:12A larger Fubuki could have changed destroyer-leader limitsNotable Point
- What were the 'Bearns' of the other Major Navies? RM, IJN, USN, RN & Kreigsmarine51:51Mogami's gun upgrade did not rebalance the cruiserChapter
- What were the 'Bearns' of the other Major Navies? RM, IJN, USN, RN & Kreigsmarine55:19Ryujo's second hangar overwhelmed a light hullChapter
- What were the 'Bearns' of the other Major Navies? RM, IJN, USN, RN & Kreigsmarine58:07Ryujo suggests an alternative light-carrier treaty categoryNotable Point
- What were the 'Bearns' of the other Major Navies? RM, IJN, USN, RN & Kreigsmarine1:27:43King George V's quadruple turrets complicated its batteryChapter
- What were the 'Bearns' of the other Major Navies? RM, IJN, USN, RN & Kreigsmarine1:30:30Fourteen-inch gun policy met foreign and Admiralty resistanceNotable Point
- Amagi Class Battlecruiser: Key Ship Series 2, Ship 523:42If naval limitation waited until 1930Notable Point
- Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...1:22:42Fubuki's firepower needed a broader hullChapter
- Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...1:31:37Should Japan have built larger fleet destroyers before the London Treaty?Q&A
- Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...1:33:31The Washington Treaty left room for carrier escort cruisersNotable Point
- Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...1:34:54Mogami was prepared for bigger guns but not better protectionChapter
- Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...1:44:22Did treaty limits force poor heavy-cruiser designs?Q&A
- Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...1:44:53Could Mogami have been built to accept more armour?Q&A
- Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...1:48:37Ryujo's second hangar undermined a viable light carrierChapter
- Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...2:08:27Why did treaty cruisers default to 8-inch guns?Q&A
- Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...2:53:54York class: a cheaper cruiser that delivered lessChapter
- Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...3:03:06Could a treaty-limit anti-aircraft cruiser carry heavy armour?Q&A
- Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...3:03:56King George V: political calibre choice and complex turretsNotable Point
- Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...3:13:44Could Britain have redesigned the first King George V ships after Japan left?Q&A
- Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...3:18:35Why was the 14-inch gun pursued?Q&A
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done1:16:21Treaty tonnage made 14-inch quadruple turrets attractiveNotable Point
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done1:50:39How Francesco Caracciolo could have disrupted fleetsNotable Point
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done1:54:29How Caracciolo could alter British carrier conversionsNotable Point
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done2:14:00The appeal and limits of 14-inch volume of fireNotable Point
- Bruships 111: Random Books of History42:08Italian heavy cruisers and treaty compromiseQ&A
- Ship-Shape Special: Alex & Garius Command a Carrier... How bad can this be?53:27Lexington and Saratoga against treaty displacement limitsQ&A
- HMS Dreadnought, but built around the RN's favourite battleship guns...42:59What a 10-inch treaty cruiser would changeQ&A
- HMS Dreadnought, but built around the RN's favourite battleship guns...56:31How Japan might answer a 10-inch American cruiserNotable Point
- HMS Dreadnought, but built around the RN's favourite battleship guns...1:53:54Combining a larger air group with an armoured hangarNotable Point
- HMS Dreadnought, but built around the RN's favourite battleship guns...3:42:53When a super-battleship arms race reaches an industrial cutoffNotable Point
- Bruships 110: Naval Aviation1:53:41Why naval treaties needed a destroyer-leader categoryQ&A
- Bruships 110: Naval Aviation2:50:09More treaty categories create more boundary problemsQ&A
- Bruships 110: Naval Aviation3:26:59County-class cruisers and the treaty's spiritQ&A
- Empire Total War Twitch Stream 9(April 2023)44:25How completed G3 and N3 ships could reshape treaty limitsChapter
- Empire Total War Twitch Stream 9(April 2023)54:26Could Admiral-class hulls have become aircraft carriers?Q&A
- Bruships 109: Mahan, an inspiration & a Reflection + Bonus22:29A wider race for large oxygen torpedoesQ&A
- Bruships 109: Mahan, an inspiration & a Reflection + Bonus46:34Treaty carrier arithmetic and worldwide commitmentsQ&A
- Bruships 109: Mahan, an inspiration & a Reflection + Bonus3:59:00Mahan's influence on capital-ship treaty categoriesQ&A
- Bruships 109: Mahan, an inspiration & a Reflection + Bonus4:02:24Treaty speed limits for different capital shipsQ&A
- Royal Navy retains the 'Fleet Units' of Royal Naval Air Service in 1918 - an Alternate History1:31:57Naval constructors designed around treaty accountingNotable Point
- Bruships 108: PLanned for Random Books off the Shelf & Chat31:54Small carriers and treaty loopholesQ&A
- Bruships 108: PLanned for Random Books off the Shelf & Chat54:09Why Lexington-class carriers carried 8-inch gunsQ&A
- Patreon Bonus: Reichsmarine & Kreigsmarine eschews steam and goes all Diesel(-electric) propulsion23:35A twelve-gun Königsberg could ripple through cruiser treatiesNotable Point
- Patreon Bonus: Reichsmarine & Kreigsmarine eschews steam and goes all Diesel(-electric) propulsion1:03:03An early Königsberg decision reshapes the treaty environmentChapter
- Patreon Bonus: Reichsmarine & Kreigsmarine eschews steam and goes all Diesel(-electric) propulsion1:37:35French, Japanese, and destroyer responses reshape treaty limitsChapter
- Patreon Bonus: Reichsmarine & Kreigsmarine eschews steam and goes all Diesel(-electric) propulsion1:41:43The United States may build Alaska-style ships and more carriers earlierNotable Point
- Still Trying to deal with the Inadvertently Created Super Bismarck1:27:19How an 18-inch Argincourt could reshape naval treatiesNotable Point
- Still Trying to deal with the Inadvertently Created Super Bismarck1:36:59How larger capital ships could raise the cruiser calibre ceilingQ&A
- Bruships 107: Some New to Me Books & Some New from Pen & Sword2:00:25The treaty cost of better Italian cruisersQ&A
- Empire Total War Twitch Stream 6(March 2023)1:18:36Fast Admiral-class battleships and treaty pressureNotable Point
- Empire Total War Twitch Stream 6(March 2023)1:22:28Churchill and collective naval arms controlNotable Point
- Bruships 106: Song Dynasty & Three New Books from Pen & Sword45:09A treaty sloop could combine light guns with floatplane reconnaissanceQ&A
- Bruships 106: Song Dynasty & Three New Books from Pen & Sword1:53:02Dry-dock inspection could expose treaty-breaking cruisersQ&A
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?1:16:48Completed fast battleships could force higher treaty limitsChapter
- Bombardment of Ellwood8:01Treaty tonnage and ships fitted for equipment they do not carryNotable Point
- Bruships 103: Belfast Parts yet to arrive... so let's consider the Run up to War...14:45A modern naval treaty needs the largest fleetsQ&A
- Bruships 103: Belfast Parts yet to arrive... so let's consider the Run up to War...20:55An 18-inch Agincourt reshapes capital shipsQ&A
- If the January 1939 Tsingtao incident leads to war... Comment Response33:50Political will for a limited naval warQ&A
- Patreon 73: Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?35:59Did Queen Elizabeth set the Washington treaty standard?Q&A
- Patreon 73: Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?1:38:10The arms-race cost of Queen Elizabeth MaximusNotable Point
- Bruships 102: New Books, Sea Wolves & Skagerrak35:08How 10-inch guns would reshape treaty cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 102: New Books, Sea Wolves & Skagerrak1:05:13Designing treaty ships for concealed wartime growthQ&A
- Bruships 102: New Books, Sea Wolves & Skagerrak3:45:23Queen Elizabeth alternatives: 28 knots and heavier gunsQ&A
- Ship Design14:32Requirements-first design versus fixed constraintsNotable Point
- Patreon 72: If Jan 1939 Tsingtao incident leads to war, how does RN carrier force fair against IJN?3:32:29Would this war make battleships obsolete?Q&A
- Bruships 101: No Dalmations, but a whole HMS Belfast to build8:58Treaty cruiser gun limits and British 9.2-inch hopesQ&A
- Gunboats of the 1920s, 1930s & WWII including Dragonfly Class1:31:23Treaty-exempt small ships and missed procurementNotable Point
- Dragonfly Class and other Gunboats Service in WWII1:45:46Treaty exemptions for small combatantsNotable Point
- USS Wichita: Comment Response24:59Wichita as a heavy-cruiser transitionQ&A
- USS Wichita: Comment Response41:28Treaty heavy-cruiser size gapQ&A
- Admirals, Lexingtons & Tosa; What if the Washington Naval Treaty built them?5:40The Admirals and Lexingtons break the treaty premiseChapter
- Admirals, Lexingtons & Tosa; What if the Washington Naval Treaty built them?8:58British finance and procurement shape the treaty bluffNotable Point
- Admirals, Lexingtons & Tosa; What if the Washington Naval Treaty built them?22:40Battlecruiser tonnage becomes trade-protection politicsNotable Point
- Admirals, Lexingtons & Tosa; What if the Washington Naval Treaty built them?26:53Tosa gives Japan a visible treaty winChapter
- Admirals, Lexingtons & Tosa; What if the Washington Naval Treaty built them?27:18The revised fleet lists let every navy claim a victoryNotable Point
- Admirals, Lexingtons & Tosa; What if the Washington Naval Treaty built them?30:24A strike-carrier category solves the conversion problemChapter
- Admirals, Lexingtons & Tosa; What if the Washington Naval Treaty built them?54:34The London Treaty risks triggering a new building spreeChapter
- Admirals, Lexingtons & Tosa; What if the Washington Naval Treaty built them?1:16:20A perceived treaty victory could redirect Japanese naval thinkingNotable Point
- Bruships 100: Science Fiction & Some Fvourites1:06:52Fisher's hypothetical 1930s carriers, battleships, and rebuildsQ&A
- Bruships 100: Science Fiction & Some Fvourites1:29:30Why Britain might reject a postwar naval treatyQ&A
- Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?7:36Unused carrier tonnage sharpened the French puzzleNotable Point
- Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?22:05Ministerial churn and carrier decisionsNotable Point
- Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?48:24Treaty tonnage and missed fast carriersNotable Point
- Bruships 99: Political History, Geostrategic History & Naval History1:31:51Dominion cruiser orders and British shipyardsNotable Point
- Bruships 99: Political History, Geostrategic History & Naval History1:34:22Cruisers after treaty limits disappearQ&A
- Bruships 99: Political History, Geostrategic History & Naval History2:23:09Dominion cruisers and treaty allowancesQ&A
- Bruships 99: Political History, Geostrategic History & Naval History2:34:26Why treaty limits mattered more than money to Royal Navy cruiser numbersQ&A
- Bruships 99: Political History, Geostrategic History & Naval History2:50:38Anglo-American naval treaties as non-zero-sum politicsChapter
- Bruships 99: Political History, Geostrategic History & Naval History3:17:05The F3 design and an all-15-inch Royal Navy battlefleetQ&A
- Bruships 99: Political History, Geostrategic History & Naval History3:22:48Why a twelve-gun 15-inch Nelson was not the likely alternativeQ&A
- Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-651:01:51Treaty weight constrained enclosed Tribal-class mountsQ&A
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?31:10Government turnover and naval programsChapter
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?58:45Why France did not start with a civilian training carrierQ&A
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?1:15:13Treaty tonnage and the fast-task-force gapChapter
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?1:39:57Could France pair Dunkerques and carriers?Q&A
- Christmas Videos Comment Response: Comus Class, Kynda Class & Kresta Class30:15Interwar naval money was a policy choiceQ&A
- Christmas Videos Comment Response: Comus Class, Kynda Class & Kresta Class52:02Super-cruisers could reshape treaty bargainingQ&A
- Bruships 98: Steam Engines (both maritime and rail), random & naval questions1:40:35Pacific bases can mask auxiliary gapsQ&A
- Bruships 98: Steam Engines (both maritime and rail), random & naval questions2:31:42Scharnhorst's construction supported a battleship classificationNotable Point
- Bruships 98: Steam Engines (both maritime and rail), random & naval questions3:30:08Without treaties, a US-British race might stay qualitativeQ&A
- What if Germany didn't invade Belgium in 1914?1:03:33Why fleet victory makes naval treaties less likelyNotable Point
- Christmas Videos Comment Response: Soviet Navy 1918-39 & Cruisers of the Reichsmarine & Kreigsmarine49:08Short-war assumptions undercut pre-1914 naval arms controlQ&A
- Christmas Videos Comment Response: Soviet Navy 1918-39 & Cruisers of the Reichsmarine & Kreigsmarine54:43German 11-inch cruisers could push a two-tier Royal NavyQ&A
- Insect Class: Force Multiplication of the Inshore Kind11:08Why treaties barely constrained Insect-class gunboatsNotable Point
- Insect Class: Force Multiplication of the Inshore Kind46:03Scrapped Insect-class hulls and the late Dragonfly programChapter
- Insect Class: Force Multiplication of the Inshore Kind49:25Gunboats and sloops as force multipliersNotable Point
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers25:41The Royal Navy's treaty cruiser calibre choiceChapter
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers27:17Algérie as a treaty heavy-cruiser benchmarkNotable Point
- US Treaty Cruiser in War & Retrospect2:02U.S. cruisers as the scout forceChapter
- US Treaty Cruiser in War & Retrospect6:56Lexington carriers and the scout-force tradeoffNotable Point
- US Treaty Cruiser in War & Retrospect14:04London Treaty pressure and the Portland shiftChapter
- US Treaty Cruiser in War & Retrospect20:22Heavy-cruiser labels versus design purposeNotable Point
- US Treaty Cruiser in War & Retrospect28:08Wichita as the fighting-cruiser templateChapter
- New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...10:48Washington Treaty timing mattered for 18-inch battleshipsQ&A
- New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...15:51Naval races were more than Britain and GermanyQ&A
- New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...21:35Surviving armored cruisers under the Washington TreatyQ&A
- New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...52:08Without Washington, battleship and carrier construction would accelerateQ&A
- New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...55:20An Australian battlecruiser replacement would reshape treaty fleetsQ&A
- New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...1:23:17Rearming US standard battleships would pressure treaty rivalsQ&A
- New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...1:53:51Naval treaties contracted the shipbuilding workloadQ&A
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers1:20:51How a British 9.2-inch design could change treaty cruisersQ&A
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers1:27:15What the Washington treaty actually limitedQ&A
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers2:02:17If Blücher had defined the treaty heavy cruiserQ&A
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers2:07:01Super-cruisers and fast capital-fleet tradeoffsQ&A
- Soviet Navy 1918-199150:38Treaty parity would not solve Soviet fleet divisionNotable Point
- Soviet Navy 1918-199159:53Would Soviet treaty membership require inviting South American navies?Q&A
- Soviet Navy 1918-19911:02:27Would Lenin accept naval parity with Japan?Q&A
- Soviet Navy 1918-19911:08:46Would Lenin's suspicion of the West prevent treaty participation?Q&A
- Soviet Navy 1918-19911:09:23A Soviet treaty allowance could change Japanese and German planningQ&A
- Soviet Navy 1918-19911:33:24Soviet 180 mm guns offered performance and a treaty problemNotable Point
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat54:51The Alaska class as an untreatied armored-cruiser evolutionQ&A
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat1:21:12A British alternative at the Washington Naval ConferenceQ&A
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat1:34:27Washington Treaty carrier-gun logicQ&A
- USS Wichita(CA-45); The Greatest Treaty 8in Cruiser0:00Why Pacific distances shaped WichitaChapter
- USS Wichita(CA-45); The Greatest Treaty 8in Cruiser4:37How treaty rules reshaped the heavy cruiserNotable Point
- USS Wichita(CA-45); The Greatest Treaty 8in Cruiser46:26Why Wichita wins the treaty heavy-cruiser comparisonChapter
- HMCS Sackville & The Flower Class17:00Why treaty-exempt sloops still lost the budget contestNotable Point
- Bruships 95: Science Fiction, Including Paddle 'Corn Oil' (Aka BioDiesel) Battleship Twist...1:08:23An interwar naval race would reward quality over numbersQ&A
- Bruships 95: Science Fiction, Including Paddle 'Corn Oil' (Aka BioDiesel) Battleship Twist...1:27:44North Carolina Scheme XVI or King George V?Q&A
- Bruships 95: Science Fiction, Including Paddle 'Corn Oil' (Aka BioDiesel) Battleship Twist...2:06:36Treaty loopholes and a giant pre-dreadnoughtQ&A
- Bruships 95: Science Fiction, Including Paddle 'Corn Oil' (Aka BioDiesel) Battleship Twist...2:19:58French battleships if Italy stays outside the naval treatyQ&A
- Patreon 68: What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?1:36:09Why the Hawkins class was not a natural rearmament candidateQ&A
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat16:57No US entry in 1917 reshapes the interwar PacificQ&A
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat35:52Treaty limits shape a response to larger German cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat42:45Rearming HMS Tiger runs into turret and treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat1:08:23A Yamato intelligence leak forces Allied counterbuildingQ&A
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat2:05:03Different requirements favor Nelson, Queen Elizabeth, or IowaQ&A
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat2:07:13A cruiser-leader category invites rapid counterbuildingQ&A
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat2:13:51From Nelson to King George V hull formsQ&A
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat3:49:12Why the six-inch cruiser gun survives without treaty limitsQ&A
- Cruiser Policy of the Reichsmarine & Kriegsmarine36:19Deutschland displacement and the 11-inch treaty gambleNotable Point
- Soviet Navy Part 1/3: 1918-193926:15Outside the Washington treaty systemNotable Point
- German Heavy Cruisers & Cruiser Policy/Procurement of WWII7:36A twelve-gun Hipper would expose the treaty-enforcement problemQ&A
- German Heavy Cruisers & Cruiser Policy/Procurement of WWII1:45:04The treaty category created the Hipper requirementQ&A
- German Heavy Cruisers & Cruiser Policy/Procurement of WWII2:57:10A nine-gun Deutschland could have triggered a super-cruiser raceQ&A
- Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response8:11Could a treaty battleship reserve space for larger turrets?Q&A
- Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response14:23A 38,000-ton fast Nelson built from F3 ideasNotable Point
- Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response24:01Fleet standardization versus the prestige of 16-inch gunsNotable Point
- Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response34:24Could different Washington Treaty ratios have delayed war?Q&A
- Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response36:25Where an oversized barbette's treaty savings disappearQ&A
- Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response51:35Would the treaties permit 15-inch/50 refits?Q&A
- Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response53:09How other navies might answer a British 15-inch/50 fleetNotable Point
- Washington Cheaties: Comment Response3:09Why treaty disclosure mattered more than small tonnage overrunsNotable Point
- Washington Cheaties: Comment Response22:52Why counting gun barrels would create another treaty loopholeQ&A
- Washington Cheaties: Comment Response24:34Why Washington treaty rules weaken the case for Lexington's eight-inch gunsNotable Point
- Washington Cheaties: Comment Response32:39Treaty diplomacy, public opinion, and what navies chose to protectNotable Point
- Washington Cheaties: Comment Response47:17Would a 15-inch/50 F3 derivative have been a super-Hood?Q&A
- Washington Cheaties: Comment Response49:03How the Washington treaty became a modern arms-control modelChapter
- Washington Cheaties: Comment Response54:11John Jordan as a starting point for treaty-era fleet developmentQ&A
- Washington Cheaties: Comment Response55:43What a 38,000-ton Nelson built around the F3 layout might offerQ&A
- Washington Cheaties: Comment Response1:00:38How more US cruisers might have changed later treaty bargainingNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships18:39The Washington Treaty squeezes Britain's battle lineChapter
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships22:11Britain's constructor bench tackles the treaty tradeoffsNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships39:39Nelson's compact machinery and disputed top speedNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships41:57Nelson's water-filled underwater protectionNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships44:18Why water counted as cheap treaty protectionNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships48:26Why Nelson's treaty engineering irritated Admiral KingNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships50:56How treaty battleships traded belt armour for torpedo defenceNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships52:12Nelson's treaty margin and the Lexington comparisonNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships53:40Nelson as the home-fleet apex behind Hood's prestigeNotable Point
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?7:04Why secret water armour challenged the treaties' spirit of opennessChapter
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?59:37How the Washington Treaty interrupted capital-ship developmentChapter
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?1:13:34F2 and F3: the fast designs behind Nelson's all-forward layoutChapter
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?1:30:44Why Britain chose 16-inch guns over the logical 15-inch/50Notable Point
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?1:37:24Why Nelson concentrated its main guns forwardChapter
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?1:43:42The firing-arc penalty of Nelson's compressed turret arrangementNotable Point
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?1:47:04Could Britain trade gun calibre for a third treaty battleship?Q&A
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?1:48:21What Nelson carried at 33,800 tonsChapter
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?1:57:20How Nelson's machinery was squeezed under the treaty limitChapter
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?2:15:23The design experience behind Britain's treaty battleshipsNotable Point
- Bruships 92: New Books, Naval Chat and Late 19th Century Warships...22:25Why British and American interwar naval economies differedQ&A
- Bruships 92: New Books, Naval Chat and Late 19th Century Warships...1:56:24How the Deutschland design changes with its intended purposeQ&A
- Bruships 92: New Books, Naval Chat and Late 19th Century Warships...3:10:14How treaty limits contributed to destroyer turbine wearQ&A
- Bruships 91: New Books & Cruiser Books26:22A 40,000-ton treaty successor to G3 and N3Q&A
- Bruships 91: New Books & Cruiser Books34:23A Nelson successor without the treaty building holidayQ&A
- Bruships 91: New Books & Cruiser Books53:46Nagato's true speed and the treaty battleship balanceQ&A
- Bruships 91: New Books & Cruiser Books1:50:46What 3,000 extra tons could do for NelsonQ&A
- Bruships 91: New Books & Cruiser Books3:44:48Why Alaska fits the cruiser lineageNotable Point
- Washington "Cheaties'': an Inevitability of Winning a Treaty10:52Washington Treaty limits reveal the carrier's importanceChapter
- Washington "Cheaties'': an Inevitability of Winning a Treaty21:58Treaty design must accommodate practical naval requirementsNotable Point
- Washington "Cheaties'': an Inevitability of Winning a Treaty30:33Mutual evasion made unrealistic treaty limits survivableChapter
- Washington "Cheaties'': an Inevitability of Winning a Treaty36:10The 10,000-ton cruiser rule invited predictable evasionNotable Point
- Washington "Cheaties'': an Inevitability of Winning a Treaty41:20A 40,000-ton ceiling could reduce incentives to cheatChapter
- Washington "Cheaties'': an Inevitability of Winning a Treaty45:12A destroyer loophole could channel Italian constructionNotable Point
- Washington "Cheaties'': an Inevitability of Winning a Treaty58:43Successful arms control must reward complianceChapter
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:22What counts as cheating under a naval treaty?Chapter
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:11:50Why Britain kept treaty restraints after Japan withdrewQ&A
- Capitani Romani Class Cruisers: Supersized Destroyers or Shrunk Cruisers?13:43Treaty limits turned cruiser design into a cycle of countersNotable Point
- Bruships 90: Books From the Road6:40Why treaty-era capital-ship trades required much more than Admiralty approvalQ&A
- Bruships 90: Books From the Road24:20What 42,000 tons could add to the Nelson designQ&A
- Bruships 90: Books From the Road45:57Larger treaty battleships would push Japan beyond Yamato-scale ambitionsQ&A
- Bruships 90: Books From the Road54:10Using Invincible as the treaty cruiser standard reshapes every ship categoryQ&A
- Bruships 90: Books From the Road1:39:41A no-treaty G3 follow-on combines eighteen-inch guns, speed, and protectionQ&A
- Bruships 90: Books From the Road3:45:26N3 would likely evolve toward Nelson's layout in a no-treaty arms raceQ&A
- Marathon(1888) Class: 19th Century Cruisers Series 2 Part 40:00How cruiser classifications changed around the Marathon classChapter
- Marathon(1888) Class: 19th Century Cruisers Series 2 Part 43:14A British super-cruiser thought experiment with 14-inch gunsNotable Point
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 428:02How an interwar G3 refit might trade guns for speedQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 444:28Without a battleship holiday, King George V evolves from NelsonQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 41:04:36Without the battleship holiday, replacement could outrank modernizationQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 41:27:12Scrapping Eagle early could free tonnage for a second Ark RoyalQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 41:30:40Carrier warfare still matures without Washington and LondonQ&A
- Shortcomings of Early Aircraft Carriers: What Lessons can we Learn from Innovation?49:02Ranger and Ryujo pushed light construction too farChapter
- Shortcomings of Early Aircraft Carriers: What Lessons can we Learn from Innovation?55:29Ark Royal left treaty tonnage unusedChapter
- Shortcomings of Early Aircraft Carriers: What Lessons can we Learn from Innovation?1:12:09Wasp squeezed a fleet carrier into too little tonnageNotable Point
- Shortcomings of Early Aircraft Carriers: What Lessons can we Learn from Innovation?1:15:19Illustrious traded aircraft flexibility for armored protectionChapter
- Bruships 89: New Books (Christmas Recomendations) & Personal Accounts of War1:13:34Six Lexington conversions would not be identicalNotable Point
- Bruships 89: New Books (Christmas Recomendations) & Personal Accounts of War2:32:53Smaller Courageous conversions bought more flight decksQ&A
- Bruships 88: Way of War1:03:59Why Japan could welcome two British G3sQ&A
- Bruships 88: Way of War1:14:14Why treaty cruisers were defined by more than gunsQ&A
- Bruships 88: Way of War1:53:00Would G3 carriers produce larger destroyers sooner?Q&A
- Bruships 88: Way of War2:29:44How a Soviet battleship could break treaty limitsQ&A
- Brooklyn Class(US Treaty Cruisers): Comment Response24:36Why Brooklyn used internal magazine armourQ&A
- Brooklyn Class(US Treaty Cruisers): Comment Response39:37Why Brooklyn design Scheme B used a broken deckQ&A
- Abruzzi Class: Condottieri of the Regia Marina41:35Fast enough, armored enough, and hard to outmatchChapter
- Escort Carriers, the idea, designs, development and some notable operations1:41Why trade-protection carriers stalled before the warChapter
- Escort Carriers, the idea, designs, development and some notable operations17:26Treaties and budgets narrow the small-carrier opportunityChapter
- Escort Carriers, the idea, designs, development and some notable operations1:00:15A separate treaty category might have preserved small-carrier capacityNotable Point
- 19th Century Cruisers: Comment Response Video 3 (Sfax - Geffion)34:22How treaty limits shaped carrier armor choicesQ&A
- Patreon 63: Escort carriers, the idea, designs, development and notable operations2:00Why Britain did not build escort carriers before the warChapter
- Patreon 63: Escort carriers, the idea, designs, development and notable operations7:42Why Britain kept to carrier treaty limitsQ&A
- Patreon 63: Escort carriers, the idea, designs, development and notable operations9:28Why relabeling carriers did not create treaty tonnageQ&A
- Patreon 63: Escort carriers, the idea, designs, development and notable operations14:39What treaty clause could have enabled escort carriers?Q&A
- Patreon 63: Escort carriers, the idea, designs, development and notable operations28:11A squadron of Hermes-sized carriersNotable Point
- Columbia (1892) Class: 19th Century Cruisers (+ Star Trek & SSBNX) part 113:53Speed compromises meet American sea-power politicsNotable Point
- Columbia (1892) Class: 19th Century Cruisers (+ Star Trek & SSBNX) part 1139:07Cramp's rise and decline as a naval-industrial lessonChapter
- New Orleans Class: US Treaty Era Cruisers1:12New Orleans class and the evolution of American treaty cruisersChapter
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out2:18:02Why a treaty-era battlecarrier wastes tonnageQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-409:48Why durable naval treaties must be equitableQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-4057:13How larger battleship guns reduce the practical batteryQ&A
- Five Weaknesses of Allied/Axis/Minor Navies in 1941 & 1942; Response to some Comments48:35Was Canada the world's third-largest navy in 1945?Q&A
- Patreon 61: Selborne-Fisher Scheme: Integration & De-Integration of Executive & Engineering Branches15:52Carrier doctrine as a test of officer educationChapter
- Patreon 61: Selborne-Fisher Scheme: Integration & De-Integration of Executive & Engineering Branches26:16Which carrier generation did the thought experiment mean?Q&A
- Some Minor Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 19427:28Dominion governments also owned the escort shortfallNotable Point
- Major Allied Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 194214:00Delayed American readiness and the security value of naval treatiesNotable Point
- Five Weaknesses of Allied/Axis/Minor Navies in 1939 & 1940; Response to some Comments23:52Why HMS Unicorn could not simply gain more machineryQ&A
- Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times34:14Reading strategy through forensic engineeringChapter
- Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times40:05A treaty-breaking American battleship restarts the arms raceQ&A
- Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times3:05:03Replacing a wrecked Revenge under treaty rulesQ&A
- Major Allied Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 193913:26The policy choice behind the King George V class's 14-inch gunsNotable Point
- Major Allied Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 193915:24Dunkerque turret complexity versus fleet numbersNotable Point
- Major Allied Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 193939:11Expanding American cruisers and destroyers after treaty collapseNotable Point
- Infrastructure in the Colonies: shipyards of the Commonwealth and Empire.18:27A practical shipbuilding ladder for the DominionsChapter
- Infrastructure in the Colonies: shipyards of the Commonwealth and Empire.20:08Steady batches and treaty space could have preserved Australian yardsChapter
- Infrastructure in the Colonies: shipyards of the Commonwealth and Empire.39:47The 1934 naval estimates contained a serious case for disarmamentChapter
- Patreon 59: Infrastructure in the Colonies: shipyards of the Commonwealth and Empire.1:43:38How treaty-era sloops stayed under the 20-knot lineQ&A
- Patreon 58: Ruse de Guerre or Deception, disguises and decoys in naval warfare11:57Naval-treaty manoeuvres are diplomatic rusesQ&A
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today7:12A Greek battleship and an eastern Mediterranean arms raceQ&A
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today54:44How a 1934 paper defined the aircraft carrierChapter
- Reginae Maris Nostri: The Cruisers of Mussolini's Regia Marina44:39Imported machinery constrained treaty deceptionNotable Point
- Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack1:31:41Why an eight-inch gun does not define a useful heavy cruiserNotable Point
- Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack2:30:03The Royal Navy's planned 9.2-inch cruisersQ&A
- French Cruiser Policy & Doctrine of the 1920s & 30s (Long Patrol)22:54Naval chiefs faced a revived Jeune EcoleChapter
- French Cruiser Policy & Doctrine of the 1920s & 30s (Long Patrol)50:01Naval diplomacy might have strengthened Weimar GermanyNotable Point
- French Cruiser Policy & Doctrine of the 1920s & 30s (Long Patrol)1:16:34Elegant ships from an inconsistent naval systemChapter
- French 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine (Live)1:00:06What ended France's surviving armored cruisers?Q&A
- French 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine (Live)1:58:02How punitive policy toward Weimar Germany could become self-fulfillingChapter
- French 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine (Live)2:05:04Did treating Weimar Germany fairly mean appeasement?Q&A
- French 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine (Live)2:06:09Could naval limits keep Germany weaker than France?Q&A
- Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions13:42What 13,500-ton treaty cruisers might have changedQ&A
- Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions2:19:14Combining British and American naval industry before 1914Notable Point
- Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions3:43:39From protected and armored cruisers to light cruisersQ&A
- Modern Frigates: Cruisers by any other name? (Patreon 57 Long Patrol)0:26Why navies prefer the frigate labelChapter
- Modern Frigates: Cruisers by any other name? (Patreon 57 Long Patrol)13:39Warship categories grow beyond their original scaleNotable Point
- UAD Homage and Questions of US Cruiser Introduction Answered (Long Patrol)15:42Why treaty armament does not make a true heavy cruiserQ&A
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?3:21Why VLS count does not define a cruiserQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 21:02:13How 9.2-inch armoured cruisers could change classificationQ&A
- Bruships 80: Books From Travels1:56:24Why Italy retained obsolete capital ships for treaty bargainingQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:02Using an equitable treaty as an analytical baselineChapter
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)14:39A fixed technology margin instead of an automatic escalatorQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)21:29Why treaty ratios need simple whole numbersQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)28:18What Admiral-class carrier conversions mean for Courageous and GloriousQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)36:59A replacement calendar built around service lifeChapter
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)40:01Why treaty replacement rules use year-end datesQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)54:14County-class reserve for post-treaty growthQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)1:40:41A disciplined counterfactual method for treaties and shipsChapter
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:03:36How treaty limits constrained Dominion navies as well as BritainNotable Point
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:15:18How treaty-free Tribal-class destroyers might growQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:34:22How naval professional input declined across the treaty systemNotable Point
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:35:56Why durable treaties must let signatories be honestChapter
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:40:35Why naval treaty enforcement clauses are difficultQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:41:05Why equal treaty rights do not require equal naval spendingQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:52:52Why known treaty penalties still need proofQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:54:40Rounding submarine tonnage into whole-ship allocationsNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)5:45Why arms limits can create a balance of weaknessChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)12:56North Carolina shows what 35,000 tons could deliverNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)15:02The political assumptions behind the alternate treatyNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)21:28When treaty definitions turn monitors into capital shipsNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)30:35A 10:10:7:4:4 ratio intended to reassure JapanChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)31:05Capital-ship limits and replacement agesNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)37:20Carrier ceilings and a one-fifth building capChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)45:34Simplifying cruiser ratios and fleet compositionChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)47:24County-class weight and the York-class compromiseNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)52:51Turning destroyer tonnage into usable flotillasChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)57:38The sloop exemption and proposed design limitsNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)1:07:59A flat submarine allowance for all major powersChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)1:11:18A disclosed compromise for Pacific fortificationsChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)1:13:17Security through visible, limited constructionChapter
- Giussano Class: Regia Marina's First Condottieri (Long Patrol)16:08Treaty ceilings distorted the cruiser design spaceNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaties: Submarines & Fortifications (Long Patrol)2:47The fortification freeze carried into the London treatiesNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaties: Submarines & Fortifications (Long Patrol)3:10British submarine bans versus ASW investmentNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaties: Submarines & Fortifications (Long Patrol)5:35Avoid anachronistic, zero-sum fleet rankingsNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaties: Submarines & Fortifications (Long Patrol)9:10London Treaty submarine size and gun limitsChapter
- Equitable London Treaties: Submarines & Fortifications (Long Patrol)20:28One-, two-, and three-ocean navies under one limitNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaties: Submarines & Fortifications (Long Patrol)26:59A 60,000-ton submarine compromiseNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaties: Submarines & Fortifications (Long Patrol)30:00Submarine limits without an ASW counterweightChapter
- A Treaty Inspired Destroyer Design Discussion: UAD & Patreon Infused video1:50What do five destroyer tonnage briefs reveal?Q&A
- A Treaty Inspired Destroyer Design Discussion: UAD & Patreon Infused video10:52Navies understated destroyer tonnage under treaty limitsNotable Point
- A Treaty Inspired Destroyer Design Discussion: UAD & Patreon Infused video19:20Concealed torpedo reloads undermine declared tonnageNotable Point
- A Treaty Inspired Destroyer Design Discussion: UAD & Patreon Infused video41:51Without treaties, a two-tier destroyer fleet emergesChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Sloops & Other Ships (Long Patrol)1:48Spica-class torpedo boats below the treaty thresholdNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Sloops & Other Ships (Long Patrol)4:46HMS Bridgewater and Article 8's exemptionsChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Sloops & Other Ships (Long Patrol)12:18Japan's missed escort opportunityNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Sloops & Other Ships (Long Patrol)17:08The treaties did not cause the escort shortageNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Sloops & Other Ships (Long Patrol)27:04False security after the First World WarNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Sloops & Other Ships (Long Patrol)42:29A proposed 24-knot escort exemptionChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Sloops & Other Ships (Long Patrol)49:14Limits drove building while unlimited needs languishedNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Sloops & Other Ships (Long Patrol)50:17Unlimited auxiliaries for wartime logisticsNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)4:15Disarmament, balance, and deterrenceChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)10:47The political premises of an armed peaceNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)12:00The London Treaty's destroyer rulesChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)29:34A 10:10:7:4:4 destroyer settlementChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)40:29Soviet participation changes Japan's strategic balanceNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)42:11Make the flotilla the treaty unitChapter
- Equitable London Treaties: Cruisers (Long Patrol)0:00Using an equitable treaty counterfactual to test historyChapter
- Equitable London Treaties: Cruisers (Long Patrol)25:12How prescriptive limits encouraged creative accountingChapter
- Equitable London Treaties: Cruisers (Long Patrol)28:28Limiting hindsight in counterfactual treaty designNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaties: Cruisers (Long Patrol)45:15Why Japan sought a seven-to-ten naval ratioChapter
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)3:26Why the 1936 London treaty lacked deterrent valueChapter
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)14:22The 1930 capital-ship building holidayChapter
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)28:37A 10:10:7:4:4 treaty ratioChapter
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)33:24Why separate Dominion quotas were rejectedNotable Point
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)56:39Using treaty membership to support Weimar and JapanChapter
- A Quick Outline of the Equitable Treaty Series0:51Washington Treaty subjects in the seriesChapter
- A Quick Outline of the Equitable Treaty Series1:17London Treaty subjects and fleet categoriesChapter
- Patreon 54: Torpedo development 1900-1939 and it's impact on destroyer design an doctrine2:17:00Treaty displacement rules invited creative accountingQ&A
- Bruships 79: Eight New Books, plus Discussions of a Naval Nature1:31:54Treaty-era cruiser scarcity constrained Operation Pedestal choicesQ&A
- Finnish War 1808-9 (214th Anniversary of the Battle of Kuopio)2:51:39Would surviving early battlecruisers last into the 1920s?Q&A
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...19:31Why equal submarine limits would be hard to policeQ&A
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...20:23Could the treaty have defined a larger heavy cruiser?Q&A
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...1:25:42What armed merchant cruisers reveal about fleet shortagesQ&A
- County Class Cruiser Comment Response: A UAD Infused Discussion of the Part 8 Response (Long Patrol)0:03An equitable London Treaty begins with cruiser numbersChapter
- County Class Cruiser Comment Response: A UAD Infused Discussion of the Part 8 Response (Long Patrol)4:02Why treaties were not Germany's only Bismarck constraintNotable Point
- County Class Cruiser Comment Response: A UAD Infused Discussion of the Part 8 Response (Long Patrol)7:56A twelve-gun British battleship tests the treaty counterfactualNotable Point
- County Class Cruiser Comment Response: A UAD Infused Discussion of the Part 8 Response (Long Patrol)39:32How treaty navies escaped the 10,000-ton cruiser ruleQ&A
- County Class Cruiser Comment Response: A UAD Infused Discussion of the Part 8 Response (Long Patrol)49:41Capital-ship limits push fleets toward fast battleshipsChapter
- County Class Cruiser Comment Response: A UAD Infused Discussion of the Part 8 Response (Long Patrol)51:04Reconsidering the 10,000-ton cruiser category in 1930Chapter
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)20:34How flight-group limits would reshape carriersQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)30:59South American battleships were not bound to a 14-inch limitQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)36:59Why component-only treaty limits are hard to enforceQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)39:34Hood's value in Washington Treaty tonnage calculationsQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)1:18:33Large carriers under an aircraft-number treatyQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)1:22:02Why the Royal Navy moved toward twin-engine carrier aircraftQ&A
- Sentinel Class (1904): Scout Cruisers (Long Patrol)7:11When a destroyer leader counted as a cruiserNotable Point
- Bruships 76: Five New Books & a Lot of New Questions12:25HMS Tiger's armour in the treaty eraQ&A
- All Forward vs Aft Balance Main Armament: A UAD infused Discussion (Long Patrol)0:46When all-forward armament makes senseChapter
- Bruships 75: Following the 614th Running the Gauntlet2:46:40A treaty ratio for separate battlecruiser tonnageQ&A
- Patreon 50: 1939 Destroyer Doctrine of the combatant navies & Where did it come from?12:48Henderson and Chatfield argue over destroyer sizeNotable Point
- Patreon 50: 1939 Destroyer Doctrine of the combatant navies & Where did it come from?26:18Which naval treaty actually limited destroyer sizeQ&A
- Patreon 50: 1939 Destroyer Doctrine of the combatant navies & Where did it come from?1:09:41Treaty figures still left real design marginsNotable Point
- Patreon 50: 1939 Destroyer Doctrine of the combatant navies & Where did it come from?1:55:01Naval treaties tried to stop wartime seizure of export shipsQ&A
- Patreon 50: 1939 Destroyer Doctrine of the combatant navies & Where did it come from?2:30:40Where a destroyer becomes a scout cruiserQ&A
- British Light Cruisers & Treaties: A UAD Infused discussion0:48Treaty limits and the grey areaChapter
- British Light Cruisers & Treaties: A UAD Infused discussion16:26Volume of fire versus the perfect cruiserNotable Point
- British Light Cruisers & Treaties: A UAD Infused discussion26:22Treaties, deterrence, and visible industrial strengthChapter
- British Light Cruisers & Treaties: A UAD Infused discussion31:16Battlecruisers as sea-control toolsNotable Point
- British Light Cruisers & Treaties: A UAD Infused discussion37:27Treaty-induced neglect and wartime rearmamentChapter
- British Light Cruisers & Treaties: A UAD Infused discussion41:41Postwar shock and the treaty-timing dilemmaNotable Point
- ARA La Argentina(1937): Year of the Cruisers (Long Patrol)29:20A role-focused design and a possible Crown Colony precursorNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)19:24Ship-number limits versus destroyer tonnage limitsQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)23:30A twelve-gun King George V after treaty limits lapseQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)24:55What a ship-count treaty would incentivizeQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)36:09Why treaty declarations manipulated displacementQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)47:42The practical margin around treaty displacementQ&A
- Patron 49: Admiral Kimmel: A Failure of Leadership? (Live)1:20:35Why compare official treaty tonnages?Q&A
- Patron 49: Admiral Kimmel: A Failure of Leadership? (Live)1:27:29Did Britain and America share treaty definitions?Q&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World2:09:04Treaty fortification limits and colonial infrastructureQ&A
- County Class P4: The Norfolk class… and why they stopped - extended (Long Patrol)27:32Treaty limits and the heavy-cruiser force Britain wantedNotable Point
- County Class P4: The Norfolk class… and why they stopped - extended (Long Patrol)42:31Why Surrey and Northumberland were cancelledChapter
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment4:26What if a Malta-class carrier appeared in 1935?Q&A
- All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)0:20Why an all-forward battery is more than a treaty expedientChapter
- All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)27:32Treaty tonnage and French capital-ship choicesChapter
- All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)39:05Why two Nelsons demanded an unusually protected designChapter
- All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)39:33How treaty limits encouraged the fast-battleship compromiseNotable Point
- Bruships 70: Travelling along...39:10A treaty system built around 45,000-ton capital shipsQ&A
- Some Sunday Naval Books28:10Treaty-era modernisation of capital shipsNotable Point
- Some Sunday Naval Books36:37How treaty limits changed British strategyChapter
- Bruships 69: The Decider37:20Why HMS New Zealand was difficult to preserveQ&A
- Bruships 69: The Decider2:10:15Changing carrier limits mattered more than closing loopholesQ&A
- County Cruisers P3: The London Class (Long Patrol)11:29Foreign stations still needed ships below the battlecruiserNotable Point
- County Cruisers P3: The London Class (Long Patrol)21:40Devonshire's accident became an opportunity to moderniseNotable Point
- British Industry: The More than Just Ships P1/4 - Building (Long Patrol)6:19Treaty limits and the shipbuilding pipelineNotable Point
- Bruships 68: Random Naval History Books & Questions2:25:15Treaty-exempt battlecruisers as rolling design experimentsQ&A
- Patreon 42: "Recovering from Disaster: The Imperial Russian Navy between Russo-Japanese War & WW1."2:24:14Q&A: What could an Izmail carrier conversion have changed?Q&A
- Pluton 1928 (Long Patrol)37:08A treaty cruiser category, but a minelayer in practiceNotable Point
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru49:13A treaty fleet built to the two-power standardQ&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru1:01:31Could British armored cruisers become interwar heavy cruisers?Q&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru1:12:53Why capital-ship parity mattered more than cruiser advantageQ&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru1:33:14How America might answer five British capital-ship carrier conversionsQ&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru1:54:35How naval treaties might have increased the risk of warQ&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru2:08:58How HMS Incomparable could rewrite the naval treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru2:20:04What a 14-inch gun limit without a tonnage limit encouragesQ&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru3:23:33How 16,000-ton 9-inch cruisers could change DunkerqueQ&A
- The Principles and Factors of Cruiser Design(Live)56:25Was Alaska an unnatural cruiser design?Q&A
- The Principles and Factors of Cruiser Design(Live)2:30:32Why did Britain retain the County-class cruisers?Q&A
- The Principles and Factors of Cruiser Design(Live)3:06:38What if naval treaties had allowed true heavy cruisers?Chapter
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (10)1:04:56Why interwar naval treaty cheating was hard to punishNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (10)3:07:23How the Royal Navy bent treaty displacement rulesNotable Point
- County Cruisers P2: The Kent Class Continued1:15Why the Counties were not simply ‘heavy cruisers’Chapter
- Bruships 65: Naval History Books & Questions Answered23:09What Canadian capital ships might have looked likeQ&A
- Bruships 65: Naval History Books & Questions Answered3:14:48Treaty weight and the King George V class's wet bowQ&A
- Bruships 65: Naval History Books & Questions Answered4:13:18The Royal Navy's unbuilt 1916 armored-cruiser studiesQ&A
- Abdiel Class: When You Want To Really Go Fast (Long Patrol)12:11Cruiser classification after the treaty systemNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)4:19Treaty frigates and the early escort shortfallQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)9:48A battlecruiser category reshapes carrier conversionsQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)19:55Armoured-cruiser limits invite disguised expansionQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)22:50Japanese treaty parity could become a fiscal trapQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)25:43Modern fleets have outgrown interwar treaty categoriesQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)1:15:41Designing a 22,000-ton treaty armoured cruiserQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)1:16:29British treaty practice relied on favorable allowancesQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)2:05:03A four-battlecruiser allowance changes Britain's carrier hullsQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)2:33:56Without treaties, infrastructure sets the battleship ceilingQ&A
- Patreon 41: RN Strategic & Tactical thinking on submarines & anti-submarine forces between the Wars40:49The S class balanced Atlantic and Mediterranean demandsChapter
- Patreon 41: RN Strategic & Tactical thinking on submarines & anti-submarine forces between the Wars1:29:31Naval treaty rules created a useful sloop formulaChapter
- Patreon 41: RN Strategic & Tactical thinking on submarines & anti-submarine forces between the Wars2:09:20How the treaty limit constrained the Tribal-class destroyersQ&A
- How was British Night Fighting Doctrine developed for and then practiced during WWII? (Long Patrol)1:20:53Why global war favoured dispersed task forcesChapter
- Bruships 63: The Writing Theorists - Corbett & Mahan, Richmond & Simms, Cable & Gorshkhov43:50Could Japan have hidden Kaga from treaty limits?Q&A
- Bruships 62: Naval History Book Review & Chat1:38:25How British 18-inch work shaped treaty pressureQ&A
- Patreon 36: Repair Ships, Depot Ships, Tenders and Stores Ships...1:42:57Was HMS Unicorn really only an auxiliary?Q&A
- The Sinking of HMS Rawalpindi, 23rd of November 1939; Long patrol1:00:23The limits of merchant conversion in a major warChapter
- Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat1:30:02Why Japan was unlikely to accept another unequal treatyQ&A
- Patreon 37: Interwar RN logistics - The Good, The Bad, and The Singapore22:33Auxiliaries stayed outside naval treaty tonnageQ&A
- Patreon 37: Interwar RN logistics - The Good, The Bad, and The Singapore2:32:39Naval treaties relied on mutual restraintQ&A
- Patreon 37: Interwar RN logistics - The Good, The Bad, and The Singapore2:38:56Treaty fuel exclusion favored global naviesNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (7)29:30The Vickers 14-inch gun and treaty politicsQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (7)53:01Britain used 14-inch guns as a treaty signalQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (7)1:01:39London II and the timing problem in rearmamentQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (7)1:10:05Treaty warships take shape before ratificationNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (7)1:26:22Could fleet-age limits replace the treaty construction holiday?Q&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (7)1:46:10Why navies build before the ideal design is readyNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (7)3:04:50How an 18-inch Agincourt could reshape treaty limitsQ&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…37:11What Commonwealth Queen Elizabeths would changeQ&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...26:42A treaty begins before the conference opensNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...1:51:19Could Britain lengthen the 15-inch gun during refits?Q&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...2:10:58Would fewer treaties delay carrier development?Q&A
- Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)1:05:54How Canadian battleships could have complicated WashingtonNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)1:36:06Construction waves and the battleship generations that never arrivedChapter
- Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)1:39:57Why Britain scrapped 12-inch dreadnoughts after the warQ&A
- Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)1:46:49The Nelson class in the treaty-era gapNotable Point
- Patreon 34: Inter-war Naval Aircraft Development - what could have been?20:50Treaties shaped the carrier fleet that emergedChapter
- Patreon 34: Inter-war Naval Aircraft Development - what could have been?28:59Why carrier limits emerged through successive naval treatiesQ&A
- Patreon 34: Inter-war Naval Aircraft Development - what could have been?1:09:15How a treaty-free carrier fleet might have divided into heavy and light typesQ&A
- Patreon 34: Inter-war Naval Aircraft Development - what could have been?1:15:40Anglo-American parity if later naval conferences failedQ&A
- Victims of the Kantai Kessen: Japanese Cruisers of the 1920s & 1930s (Long Patrol / Patreon 32)1:43The treaty gap that created the heavy cruiserNotable Point
- Victims of the Kantai Kessen: Japanese Cruisers of the 1920s & 1930s (Long Patrol / Patreon 32)9:11Why Ibuki was called a battle cruiserQ&A
- Victims of the Kantai Kessen: Japanese Cruisers of the 1920s & 1930s (Long Patrol / Patreon 32)11:22One-, two-, and five-ocean fleet allowancesNotable Point
- Victims of the Kantai Kessen: Japanese Cruisers of the 1920s & 1930s (Long Patrol / Patreon 32)30:43Aoba class and the problem of official displacementNotable Point
- Victims of the Kantai Kessen: Japanese Cruisers of the 1920s & 1930s (Long Patrol / Patreon 32)34:20Myoko and treaty limits as fleet policyChapter
- Victims of the Kantai Kessen: Japanese Cruisers of the 1920s & 1930s (Long Patrol / Patreon 32)36:37Naval treaties and tolerated evasionNotable Point
- Victims of the Kantai Kessen: Japanese Cruisers of the 1920s & 1930s (Long Patrol / Patreon 32)57:19Japan's infrastructure limit and the fast scout-carrier alternativeChapter
- Patreon 32: Japanese heavy cruisers of the 1920s & 1930s, were they worth it?14:12Why the Ibuki class straddles cruiser categoriesQ&A
- Patreon 32: Japanese heavy cruisers of the 1920s & 1930s, were they worth it?53:46Why treaty cruisers grew toward 10,000 tonsQ&A
- Patreon 32: Japanese heavy cruisers of the 1920s & 1930s, were they worth it?58:58A counterfactual postwar armoured-cruiser categoryQ&A
- Patreon 32: Japanese heavy cruisers of the 1920s & 1930s, were they worth it?2:37:12Leaving the treaties in 1929 would start an earlier naval raceQ&A
- Chiefs of Staff of the Axis Navies: (Long Patrol) - P13/14: Mitsumasa Yonai11:25Status ships and the limits of deterrenceNotable Point
- Bruships 56: "Walking Softly & Carrying a Big Stick" - Admirals, Diplomacy & Detterence2:04:11Japanese treaty factions as competing deterrence strategiesQ&A
- Bruships 56: "Walking Softly & Carrying a Big Stick" - Admirals, Diplomacy & Detterence3:51:59Eight Renowns would make speed the Royal Navy's interwar standardQ&A
- Bruships 56: "Walking Softly & Carrying a Big Stick" - Admirals, Diplomacy & Detterence4:10:01How separate battlecruiser treaty limits could change fleetsQ&A
- Bruships 56: "Walking Softly & Carrying a Big Stick" - Admirals, Diplomacy & Detterence4:12:57A delayed war could produce British 9.2-inch heavy cruisersQ&A
- Karl Dönitz (on his Birthday) - how capable an Admiral was he?59:36Fushimi and Japan's naval treaty struggleChapter
- Karl Dönitz (on his Birthday) - how capable an Admiral was he?1:07:43Naval treaties postponed Japan's infrastructure reckoningNotable Point
- Karl Dönitz (on his Birthday) - how capable an Admiral was he?3:11:52Yonai's case against war with Britain and AmericaChapter
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (6)1:32:30The larger Illustrious that treaty limits constrainedQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (6)2:53:02Why armour and air-group size became a carrier trade-offQ&A
- Chiefs of Staff of the Axis Navies: (Long Patrol) P3/14: Domenico Cavagnari14:17Treaty breakdown and a lost procurement openingNotable Point
- Chiefs of Staff of the Axis Navies: (Long Patrol) P2/14: Prince Fushimi Hiroyasu11:12The Fleet Faction and treaty withdrawalChapter
- Chiefs of Staff of the Axis Navies: (Long Patrol) P2/14: Prince Fushimi Hiroyasu14:36Treaty withdrawal as an open warningChapter
- Shipbuilding through the 1880s-1950s1:14:49Dreadnought as a turning point, not a resetNotable Point
- Shipbuilding through the 1880s-1950s2:35:36Preparing gun upgrades under treaty limitsQ&A
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 8/11 Both Queens but Different0:23Ark Royal and Yorktown as purpose-built fleet carriersChapter
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 8/11 Both Queens but Different19:27A second Ark Royal and the Yorktown trio as force-structure choicesNotable Point
- A Book or Two to Review (29): The Spanish Civil War at Sea18:25Sloops could build escorts and shipyard capacityChapter
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 5/11 Building a Navy11:23French imperial security relied on British sea powerNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (5)19:07Where modern frigates fit in treaty-era classificationsQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (5)2:51:54Why British and American carrier designs divergedChapter
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 3/11 Pre-Dreadnought Cruisers2:41Why armoured cruisers did not become heavy cruisersNotable Point
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 3/11 Pre-Dreadnought Cruisers8:32Information warfare and treaty-limited scoutsNotable Point
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 3/11 Pre-Dreadnought Cruisers11:07Cruisers as a missing link in the Second World WarChapter
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 3/11 Pre-Dreadnought Cruisers13:03Why treaty limits must produce viable shipsNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (4)2:23:28If the United States stayed out of the First World WarQ&A
- Patreon 31: Armoured Cruisers in the Mediterranean in WWI1:33:06The Warrior class approached a more coherent cruiserNotable Point
- Bruships 55: New Books4:58:38Treaty parity and the fleets governments actually fundedNotable Point
- Patreon 30: Japanese hybrid warships of WW223:26Treaty gray areas and planned escort-carrier conversionsChapter
- Japanese Hybrids: Teaser for Today's Patreon Live16:19Prewar seaplane tenders as carrier-reserve preparationChapter
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (3)19:18A treaty fleet big enough for AsiaQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (3)47:14Treaty cruisers at 12,500 tonsQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (3)2:02:04A ten-year replacement rule instead of a battleship holidayQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (3)2:06:57More numerous but smaller treaty carriersQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (3)3:13:07King George V without treaty restrictionsQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (3)3:32:28A pre-dreadnought loophole in naval treatiesQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (3)3:40:23Why the Anglo-Japanese Alliance still endedQ&A
- Battle of the Atlantic (Redo): Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas Badly Done p7/735:41What if battlecruisers had been classified as frigates?Notable Point
- A Book or Two to Review (16): Carrier, A Century of First-Hand Accounts of Naval Operations...14:18Treaty tonnage and armoured carrier air groupsNotable Point
- A Book or Two to Review (16): Carrier, A Century of First-Hand Accounts of Naval Operations...20:43How extra treaty tonnage points toward ImplacableNotable Point
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions1:20:07Naval treaty compliance was a spectrumQ&A
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions1:35:08Wartime torpedo reloads reveal treaty design marginsNotable Point
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions1:50:16Without naval treaties, carriers grow alongside battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions1:53:04Why treaties settled on six- and eight-inch cruiser gunsQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (2)16:12A treaty loophole for torpedo-heavy capital shipsQ&A
- A Book or Two to Review (5): Italian Battleships - Conte di Cavour & Duilio Classes 1911-19562:48Italian capital-ship parity under disarmament uncertaintyNotable Point
- A Book or Two to Review (5): Italian Battleships - Conte di Cavour & Duilio Classes 1911-195616:22Rebuilt Cavours support a watchful-waiting strategyNotable Point
- Naval Fire Support of the WWI Western Front: Long Patrol, Part 6, Gorgon Class28:06Reserve, rejection, and Gorgon's postwar disposalNotable Point
- “Coastal Command in the 1920s & 1930s”1:59:34Why the Royal Navy preferred more light cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 49 Special: 'Questions on ‘Battle Cruisers’ & ‘Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14)3:40A delayed Washington Treaty and the capital-ship raceQ&A
- Bruships 49 Special: 'Questions on ‘Battle Cruisers’ & ‘Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14)29:40Treaty rule-bending and water-based armourQ&A
- Bruships 49 Special: 'Questions on ‘Battle Cruisers’ & ‘Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14)46:48Germany's larger design gap without naval treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 49 Special: 'Questions on ‘Battle Cruisers’ & ‘Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14)54:05Aircraft carriers without treaty-conversion hullsQ&A
- Bruships 49 Special: 'Questions on ‘Battle Cruisers’ & ‘Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14)2:46:01Battleship growth without Washington and LondonQ&A
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 191519:18Postwar capital ships extended the technology raceNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): Part 2, 190622:19Disarmament, naval insurance, and credible warningsNotable Point
- Patreon 19: 2nd Tier powers Dreadnoughts: Spain, Austria-Hungary, S.America, Greece & Ottomans54:47The unbuilt Francesco Caracciolo fast battleshipsNotable Point
- Patreon 19: 2nd Tier powers Dreadnoughts: Spain, Austria-Hungary, S.America, Greece & Ottomans1:23:34Why not arm treaty cruisers with 9.2-inch guns?Q&A
- Lend Lease Long Patrol: P1/5 WW2 prior to Lend Lease7:30The 1936 London treaty constrained an expected rearmamentNotable Point
- Lend Lease Long Patrol: P1/5 WW2 prior to Lend Lease13:13The ideal British carrier exceeded treaty tonnageNotable Point
- Lend Lease Long Patrol: P1/5 WW2 prior to Lend Lease21:19Interwar peace assumptions eroded military readinessNotable Point
- Bruships 41: A History of Armour & Amphibious Warfare (Kyle Hardman)4:17:48Tonnage limits versus a naval building holidayQ&A
- Bruships 41: A History of Armour & Amphibious Warfare (Kyle Hardman)4:23:58Would a 25,000-ton, 12-inch limit produce cruiser killers?Q&A
- Lend Lease Act 80yrs on...3:02:13A second Ark Royal and larger Illustrious-class carriersNotable Point
- Lend Lease Act 80yrs on...3:09:05Britain could have laid down a second Ark Royal immediatelyQ&A
- Crown Colony Class Long Patrol: Part 4 Ceylon to Newfoundland52:50Why criticize the 1936 naval treaty but not earlier arms limits?Q&A
- Crown Colony Class Long Patrol: Part 2 Fiji to Kenya0:50HMS Fiji's treaty-era design and real displacementChapter
- Crown Colony Class Long Patrol: Part 1 - where did they come from20:40Why arms-control promises were difficult to trustNotable Point
- Bruships 40: Favourite Books to Use When Writing...4:09:55Could Britain have replaced the R-class before 1939?Q&A
- Bruships 38: Amphibious Operations & Equipment3:17:52How a battleship holiday redirected naval constructionQ&A
- Bruships 38: Amphibious Operations & Equipment3:20:04The destroyer design iron triangleNotable Point
- Counter Piracy in China in 1920s & 1930s: Long Patrol Part 315:36How the 1936 naval treaty's safeguard clauses workedChapter
- Counter Piracy in China in 1920s & 1930s: Long Patrol Part 217:29Treaty categories leave room for sloops and Italian escortsNotable Point
- Patreon 16: Royal Navy anti-piracy operations of the 1920s & 1930s in the Far East1:18:10Treaty-exempt sloops offered a route to fleet numbersChapter
- Four Random Books 22: Warships Illustrated6:22British destroyer quantity as global strategyChapter
- Bruships 32: Ships & Space Ships (Reality & Scifi)3:51:10How local defense fleets could destabilize StarfleetNotable Point
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 8: Questions Answered24:58Why treaties discouraged fleets of small carriersQ&A
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 8: Questions Answered54:02Could Germany disguise a carrier as Zeppelin support?Q&A
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 7: Conclusion21:48Could small flight-deck ships evade carrier treaties?Q&A
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 6: 1930s Aircraft Carriers of the Big 35:40Ryujo and the cost of minimizing carrier displacementNotable Point
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 6: 1930s Aircraft Carriers of the Big 311:29Soryu outgrows Japanese treaty arithmeticChapter
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 6: 1930s Aircraft Carriers of the Big 314:54American treaty arithmetic plans the next carrier generationNotable Point
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 2: Papers & Treaties9:55Seaplane carriers sat outside treaty carrier tonnageNotable Point
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 2: Papers & Treaties34:39Ryūjō exploits the small-carrier treaty loopholeNotable Point
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 2: Papers & Treaties38:07Treaty limits reveal carriers as strategic assetsNotable Point
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s55:11Selling HMS Eagle could free treaty tonnage for a replacementQ&A
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s1:27:24How a Canadian carrier program would fit the treaty systemQ&A
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s1:45:07A 1934 proposal would replace six carriers with 31 airshipsNotable Point
- For Random Books 18: Freidman's Royal Navy10:09A 34-knot four-triple cruiser could not protect its magazinesNotable Point
- For Random Books 18: Freidman's Royal Navy12:04A 23,000-ton carrier could meet speed and air-group goals but not protectionNotable Point
- For Random Books 18: Freidman's Royal Navy13:20Carrier treaty limits collided with fleet availabilityNotable Point
- For Random Books 18: Freidman's Royal Navy14:52Carrier limits depended on Japanese acceptanceNotable Point
- For Random Books 18: Freidman's Royal Navy15:37How treaty limits freeze today's design assumptionsNotable Point
- Town Class Part 2 of 7: Contruction10:11How the Southampton, Gloucester, and Edinburgh batches grewChapter
- Town Class Part 1 of 7: Cruisers4:06Four pressures shaping Royal Navy cruiser designNotable Point
- Bruships 28: New Books & Christmas Buys1:25:32British treaty compliance through carefully read loopholesNotable Point
- Bruships 28: New Books & Christmas Buys1:33:03What a later start to the Second World War would change at seaQ&A
- Bruships 28: New Books & Christmas Buys1:55:04Books on gaming the interwar naval treatiesQ&A
- Town Class; big impact with a light footprint2:26:52Why a 10,000-ton Town looked much largerQ&A
- Amphion Class Cruisers: Long Patrol1:27Why Britain needed many cruisersChapter
- The Ships that Fisher Scrapped: Orlando Class (The Forgotten Coast Guard)7:07The 9.2-inch gun as a natural cruiser calibreQ&A
- The Ships that Fisher Scrapped: Orlando Class (The Forgotten Coast Guard)20:39A speculative Fisher super-ship and HMS IncomparableQ&A
- Amphion Class Cruisers1:24:15Why the Australian and New Zealand navies were smallQ&A
- Bruships 23 - New Book Review3:13:29Washington and London treaty bargainingQ&A
- Bruships 23 - New Book Review3:16:45French army strength and naval bargainingNotable Point
- Bruships 23 - New Book Review3:17:29France's security bargain at WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 23 - New Book Review3:20:58Britain and the naval treaty limitsQ&A
- Sloops of the Interwar a Long Patrol24:16What the Washington Treaty left openChapter
- Sloops of the Interwar a Long Patrol26:59How the London Naval Treaty shaped sloopsChapter
- Four Random Books 6: War At Sea5:47Treaty limits turn design into a chain of compromisesNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 17: Fiction & Fraction, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A3:31:22Plans to replace America's oldest battleshipsQ&A
- Patreon Video 4: Tsingtao 1939 Goes Hot...2:41:30A naval war removes peacetime funding restraintsQ&A
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P6c Introduction to Patreon Video 417:56Cruiser construction, treaties, and long-term choicesNotable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P6c Introduction to Patreon Video 423:20Treaty restraint meets maritime ruthlessnessNotable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P6b Introduction to Patreon Video 4...57:56Cruiser design choices shaped by treaty hopeChapter
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5c Introduction to Patreon Video 47:39Dido-class cruisers expose the cost of treaty-limited hullsNotable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5b Introduction to Patreon Video 446:01A Pacific-first war changes the ships Britain buildsChapter
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5b Introduction to Patreon Video 447:57Treaty collapse accelerates battleships and fleet carriersNotable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5a Introduction to Patreon Video 49:26Peacetime procurement and a balanced fleetChapter
- Bru Ships Episode 14: Special & Covert Operations Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A16:41Privateering, piracy, and state authorityQ&A
- Long Patrol: Making Mare Nostrum a Hollow Jest - RN Submarines in the Meditteranean14:29Treaty tonnage linked submarine size to fleet numbersNotable Point
- Long Patrol: Making Mare Nostrum a Hollow Jest - RN Submarines in the Meditteranean1:06:29Alexandria's 1st Flotilla and the Far East trade-offNotable Point
- P2 Introduction to Pre-Tribal Class Destroyers of the RN2:24The cost of building small for numbersChapter
- P2 Introduction to Pre-Tribal Class Destroyers of the RN12:03H-class growth and treaty reportingChapter
- P2 Introduction to Pre-Tribal Class Destroyers of the RN12:46Article 17 protected foreign warship ordersNotable Point
- P2 Introduction to Pre-Tribal Class Destroyers of the RN18:03I-class minelayers and Turkish ordersNotable Point
- P1 Introduction to Pre-Tribal Class Destroyers of the RN (special guest; Fluffy Research Assistant)2:39Why the Royal Navy needed pre-Tribal destroyersChapter
- BAD SOUND - An Introduction to Making Mare Nostrum a Hollow Jest part 1 of 215:39Treaties and budgets shaped submarine sizeNotable Point
- Patreon Video 2: Royal Navy Operations in the Indian Ocean 1941-431:39:28Later treaties mattered to Deutschland-class classificationQ&A
- Patreon Video 1: What would you put in warehouses at the end of WWI for WWII if you could?20:05Private ownership does not solve capital-ship costsQ&A
- Patreon Video 1: What would you put in warehouses at the end of WWI for WWII if you could?1:00:00Why museum-ship cover cannot hide operational readinessQ&A
- Patreon Video 1: Intro - What would you put in warehouses at the end of WWI for WWII if you could?9:02Reclassifying old destroyers as coast-guard shipsNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 9: Super Power Contest (as in the nations) Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A56:45Treaty limits as British strategyQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 9: Super Power Contest (as in the nations) Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:22:03The treaty logic behind a 14-inch battleship gunQ&A
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 2: Battle Class (+Stanley Goodall)29:03A war-built destroyer, not a treaty compromiseNotable Point
- An Introduction to Ships of the Convoy War; the Battle of Atlantic in Steel Part 4 Escort Destroyers15:51How treaty rules enabled heavily armed sloopsQ&A
- An Introduction to Ships of the Convoy War; the Battle of Atlantic in Steel Part 4 Escort Destroyers31:01Treaty-era escort designs and the cost of too little warningChapter
- Bru Ships Episode 7: Warship Design Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A51:31The Erie class and treaty loopholes for small warshipsQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 7: Warship Design Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:44:46What G3 conversions might have changed for British carriersQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 7: Warship Design Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:15:24An alternative cruiser-destroyer for the late 1930sQ&A
- An introduction to the ‘Littleships’ of the Big War Part 4 of 416:54London Naval Treaty exemptions shaped small-warship choicesChapter
- Minesweepers, Torpedo Boats & Gunboats – the ‘Littleships’ of the big war4:11How the London Naval Treaty defined little shipsChapter
- Minesweepers, Torpedo Boats & Gunboats – the ‘Littleships’ of the big war11:37Why the Abdiel class counted as cruisersNotable Point
- Minesweepers, Torpedo Boats & Gunboats – the ‘Littleships’ of the big war1:54:11The Spica class pushes beyond treaty exemptionsQ&A
- Minesweepers, Torpedo Boats & Gunboats – the ‘Littleships’ of the big war2:27:38How treaty limits stimulated ship designQ&A
- An introduction to the ‘Littleships’ of the big war Part 1 of 21:27How the London Naval Treaty defined little shipsChapter
- Bru Ships Episode 4: Naval Aviation Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A3:46:58Naval treaties let Britain save money and shape the rulesQ&A
- An Introduction to My Top 10 Warships (No Tribal, Battle, Daring or Town Classes allowed)23:01HMS Unicorn and forward fleet aviation supportNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 3: Imperial Japanese Navy Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:21:07What might have happened without the Scapa Flow scuttlingQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 3: Imperial Japanese Navy Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:55:48Could a minor navy trigger the treaty escalator clause?Q&A
- Bru Ships Episode 3: Imperial Japanese Navy Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:56:51How an Italian oil boom might reshape the Regia MarinaQ&A
- Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy1:27:36Water armor and treaty displacementNotable Point
- Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy1:34:57Using fuel as armor under treaty rulesNotable Point
- Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy2:05:02How treaty limits encouraged larger destroyersQ&A
- Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy2:06:45A 15,000-ton cruiser near the battlecruiser boundaryQ&A
- Aircraft Carriers the Debate - Dr Alex Clarke vs Armoured Carrier's Jamie3:09Where were the planned British strike carriers?Q&A
- Aircraft Carriers the Debate - Dr Alex Clarke vs Armoured Carrier's Jamie4:17Why Implacable stayed close to existing designsQ&A
- Aircraft Carriers the Debate - Dr Alex Clarke vs Armoured Carrier's Jamie1:54:24Audacious and the carrier Britain wantedNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered44:55How treaty limits constrained Town-class cruisersQ&A
- Sloops during the Inter-War – what were they for?9:07London Treaty rules created free small-ship tonnageChapter
- Sloops during the Inter-War – what were they for?11:40Why Insect-class gunboats counted with sloopsQ&A
- Sloops during the Inter-War – what were they for?1:09:49Henderson, Chatfield, and the King George V compromiseQ&A
- Sloops during the Inter-War – what were they for?1:14:44Foreign equivalents did not share one sloop formulaQ&A
- Sloops during the Inter-War – what were they for?1:34:15Sloops could be fitted rapidly for depth chargesQ&A
- Special Episode: Design, Design, Design!20:21Design X points beyond treaty-limited carriersChapter
- Special Episode: Design, Design, Design!34:38Why HMS Unicorn was not classified as a battleshipQ&A
- Special Episode: Design, Design, Design!1:30:51Why hybrid battle-carriers failedQ&A
- HMS Edinburgh - A Ship Profile3:00Treaties, cruisers, and the Royal Navy's economic-war strategyChapter
- Battle of The River Plate - A River Plate 80 Video24:14Graf Spee's design meets a three-cruiser meleeNotable Point
- Tribal Class in 60s (Combined)1:04Why the Tribal class became back-pocket cruisersChapter