Video

Malta Class: Once more the Royal Navy building for the After War? - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 2

Study Malta Class: Once more the Royal Navy building for the After War? - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 2, a Dr. Alex Clarke video from 3 Sept 2023, with 14 time notes. Topics include Aircraft Carriers, Carrier Design…

Date
Runtime40:00
Guide points14 time notes

Time notes

  1. 1:38
    Why Malta was not simply a British Midway

    The Malta class is often compared with the American Midways, but this opening separates a superficial resemblance from the Royal Navy's own design history.

    Chapter
  2. 3:08
    Treaty limits and the Royal Navy's ideal carrier

    Pre-war carrier studies began with an ideal design, then worked back to what treaty tonnage would permit.

    Chapter
  3. 5:45
    Destroyers as the carrier's protective screen

    A brief design-history detour explains why Tribal, Battle, and Daring-class destroyers repeatedly appear beside British carriers.

    Notable Point
  4. 8:33
    Unrestricted carriers versus global fleet numbers

    Malta and Midway represented unrestricted carrier ambitions, but Britain still had to balance ship size against a fleet spread across worldwide commitments.

    Notable Point
  5. 10:18
    A carrier scaled for larger wartime aircraft

    Malta retained the ambition for four lifts, a very large hangar, a large air group, and protection, but adjusted the concept for aircraft that had grown during the war.

    Notable Point
  6. 12:46
    The Future Building Committee and the post-war fleet

    Admiral Purvis's Future Building Committee revived long-range fleet thinking by pairing experienced officers with earlier Henderson-era concepts.

    Chapter
  7. 17:50
    Why deck-edge lifts carried a stability cost

    Royal Navy studies treated deck-edge lifts as an aircraft-handling gain that had to be paid for in off-centre weight, ballast, and treaty displacement.

    Chapter
  8. 19:56
    Why Malta armoured the hangar deck

    Ark Royal and the Illustrious family provide the design background for Malta's strong flight deck, expansion joint, twin islands, and armoured hangar deck.

    Chapter
  9. 22:21
    A high hangar for aircraft and maintenance

    Malta's unusually high hangar served two compatible purposes: fitting larger aircraft and giving crews room to maintain them from above.

    Notable Point
  10. 23:45
    Four shafts, speed, and the practical air group

    Four shafts promised redundancy, while the difference between roughly 80 and 108 aircraft depended on whether conditions allowed extensive deck parking.

    Notable Point
  11. 26:28
    How jet trials might have reshaped Malta's lifts

    A proposed deck-edge-lift arrangement leads into a cautious counterfactual about completing the carriers only after British jet trials.

    Notable Point
  12. 28:57
    Why the Royal Navy did not begin with Malta-sized carriers

    Treaties and production efficiency favoured repeated, adaptable designs; Malta represented a deliberate break toward a large post-war fleet carrier.

    Chapter
  13. 33:08
    Cancellation and Malta's post-war counterfactual

    After Malta was cancelled in late 1945, the smaller Audacious carriers continued; the closing argument asks how several larger Maltas might have changed post-war carrier policy.

    Chapter
  14. 35:31
    Malta and the timetable for invading Japan

    The possibility of 1947-48 completion is tied to the immense force assembly, training, and fighting expected in an invasion of Japan.

    Notable Point