Video
Naval Fire Support of the WWI Western Front: Long Patrol, Part 6, Gorgon Class
Study Naval Fire Support of the WWI Western Front: Long Patrol, Part 6, Gorgon Class, a Dr. Alex Clarke video from 5 Jun 2021, with 20 time notes. Topics include Coastal Defence Ships, Naval Fire Support, Naval Gunnery.
Time notes
- 6:00Why the Gorgon class suited coastal defenceChapter
The Gorgon class combined shallow draught, armour, and heavy guns for a coastal-defence role rather than conventional fleet manoeuvre.
- 7:51How monitors secure the coastal end of an army's lineNotable Point
Naval gunfire can deny an enemy the beach and prevent a landward flank from being turned along the coast.
- 9:25Coastal-defence ships reverse the battlecruiser tradeoffNotable Point
The speed-armour-firepower triangle shows why a coastal-defence ship concentrates on protection and guns rather than mobility.
- 11:25Compact dimensions hid enormous torpedo bulgesNotable Point
At 5,838 tons and about 94 metres long, the class paired a five-metre draught with anti-torpedo bulges that widened its beam to 22.43 metres.
- 12:34Reliable machinery gave Gorgon near-cruising speed enduranceNotable Point
Four Yarrow boilers and mature triple-expansion engines prioritized cost, range, and reliability over high speed.
- 13:01Armament arranged for a fjord fightNotable Point
Gorgon’s single 9.2-inch and six-inch mounts gave it useful arcs of fire in confined waters where manoeuvre was limited.
- 16:27Armour made Gorgon a protected coastal reconnaissance postNotable Point
Heavy turret, belt, deck, and command protection let admirals approach the Belgian coast to compare reports with what they could observe directly.
- 18:01From Norwegian order to British monitorChapter
Originally intended for Norway as Nidaros and Bergen, the ships were completed for Britain with revised armament and extensive torpedo bulges.
- 21:00Calibrating Gorgon’s guns on German batteriesChapter
After joining the Dover Patrol in 1918, Gorgon tested its long-range fire against German coastal batteries before the planned autumn offensive.
- 22:48The 1918 offensive joined production, radios, and close fire supportNotable Point
Gorgon's rushed completion reflected a year-long production decision to supply the coastal offensive with responsive naval artillery.
- 23:00Naval fire support on the Belgian coastChapter
Gorgon’s September 1918 missions show the demanding coordination, observation, and anchoring problems behind naval support for a coastal offensive.
- 26:00Reconnaissance under German coastal-battery fireNotable Point
A close reconnaissance mission confirmed that German forces still held the Belgian coast strongly, even as Gorgon briefly exceeded its trial speed under fire.
- 28:06Reserve, rejection, and Gorgon's postwar disposalNotable Point
Gorgon's short postwar sequence moved from tender and reserve service to a rejected Norwegian return, treaty disarmament, and scrapping.
- 29:01How Glatton’s magazine fire exposed construction failuresChapter
Glatton's brief service ended in a magazine explosion, prompting an investigation into insulation, missing cork, newspaper packing, and faulty riveting.
- 32:41The Glatton inquiry drove a full insulation safety refitNotable Point
Inspection of Gorgon's corresponding spaces exposed missing insulation and rivets, leading the Royal Navy to replace cork with silicate wool.
- 36:00Could a retained Gorgon have strengthened Narvik?Notable Point
The episode weighs treaty limits, dry-dock constraints, and a hypothetical 1940 Norwegian Gorgon against the German attack on Narvik.
- 36:38A retained Gorgon in the Yangtze or SingaporeNotable Point
British retention could have sent Gorgon east as a river-squadron flagship or a heavily armed obstacle to the Japanese crossing into Singapore.
- 39:55Dry-dock limits and the unfilled Narvik defence gapNotable Point
Norway lacked a dock wide enough for Gorgon's bulged beam and did not convert repeated concern over Narvik into fixed defences.
- 42:29How Gorgon could complicate the German entry into NarvikNotable Point
A third armoured ship could provide earlier warning, divide German torpedo attacks, and punish destroyers while Eidsvold or Norge was challenged.
- 46:21Tactical German losses could reshape the Narvik campaignNotable Point
More damaged German destroyers, alerted Norwegian troops, and a freer British relief force could turn one ship's resistance into wider operational effects.