Video

Why didn't the Royal Navy go for High Pressure boilers & what if they got 850psi boilers in 1934?

Study Why didn't the Royal Navy go for High Pressure boilers & what if they got 850psi boilers in 1934?, a Dr. Alex Clarke video from 12 Jul 2025, with 30 time notes. Topics include Alternate History, High Pressure…

Date
Runtime1:17:49
Guide points30 time notes

Time notes

  1. 0:23
    QuestionWhat changes if the Royal Navy has 850 psi boilers by Warspite's 1934 refit while the 5:5:3 naval-treaty framework stays the same?Answer

    The treaty system and earlier fleet remain unchanged; the divergence begins in 1934 as higher-pressure machinery reshapes refits and new construction.

    Q&A
  2. 2:19
    Why the Royal Navy favored 300 psi boilers

    The Royal Navy's 300 psi Admiralty three-drum boiler suited a worldwide fleet because it was reliable, maintainable, and straightforward to build.

    Chapter
  3. 3:37
    Why global fleets value supportable machinery

    The boiler choice illustrates a recurring fleet problem: advanced machinery can demand specialist support, trusted technicians, and secure access far from home bases.

    Notable Point
  4. 5:30
    What higher steam pressure changes

    Higher boiler pressure can reduce fuel use and boiler count while increasing turbine efficiency, shaft power, range, or speed.

    Chapter
  5. 9:22
    A plausible Brown-Curtis 850 psi plant

    Contemporary ultra-high-pressure experiments and John Brown's turbine work make an Anglo-American 850 psi marine plant technologically plausible by 1934.

    Notable Point
  6. 16:56
    Warspite as the 850 psi test case

    Replacing Warspite's historical six-boiler refit plant with four 850 psi boilers could plausibly yield a 28-knot Queen Elizabeth-class battleship and larger weight savings.

    Chapter
  7. 22:41
    How the 1934 building program diverges

    The new plant changes ships entering refit or construction from 1934 onward, from G-class destroyers and cruisers to Ark Royal, the Illustrious class, and King George V battleships.

    Chapter
  8. 22:41
    Why the counterfactual stops short of a wartime timeline

    Foreign responses make wartime outcomes too uncertain to project confidently, so the exercise concentrates on Royal Navy and US Navy construction choices before 1939.

    Notable Point
  9. 24:53
    Glorious, Courageous, and Furious phase in the new plant

    The historical refit sequence gives the Royal Navy a staged route for replacing the converted carriers' First World War-era boilers and learning from each installation.

    Notable Point
  10. 25:58
    The G class becomes the destroyer test fleet

    The G-class destroyers would be the first new destroyer design to test how 850 psi boilers change power, speed, range, and fuel efficiency at small-warship scale.

    Notable Point
  11. 27:43
    Barham exposes the cost of refitting twice

    Barham's recently completed 1931-1934 refit makes her a poor immediate candidate for another machinery reconstruction even when the new boilers promise major gains.

    Notable Point
  12. 30:58
    Machinery savings strengthen the Lion-class case

    The same weight and performance gains could improve the nine-gun 16-inch Lion design and make completing the class more attractive.

    Notable Point
  13. 31:39
    C-class AA conversions gain internal room

    Replacing six old boilers with perhaps two 850 psi units could turn the C-class anti-aircraft conversion into a much more extensive machinery and weapons redesign.

    Notable Point
  14. 32:42
    Carrier machinery savings become aircraft capacity

    Fewer boilers could give Ark Royal better protection and let Illustrious-class carriers trade machinery weight for a longer hangar and a larger air group.

    Notable Point
  15. 37:50
    A faster twelve-gun King George V

    Halving boiler count could release enough power, length, and protected volume for a 28-30-knot King George V carrying three quadruple 14-inch turrets.

    Notable Point
  16. 40:25
    Re-engining Royal Oak, Courageous, and Renown

    Britain's underused heavy-turbine capacity could support a wider program that makes older battleships and converted carriers faster, longer-ranged, or better protected.

    Chapter
  17. 44:24
    Courageous tests the future carrier plant

    Refitting Courageous could validate the machinery arrangement intended for Ark Royal and the Illustrious class while improving the older carrier's speed, range, and weight margin.

    Notable Point
  18. 46:31
    Standardization closed the adoption window

    The Royal Navy's long commitment to the three-drum boiler made a rapid mid-1930s change difficult, whereas a proven 850 psi plant available in 1934 could enter service before rearmament accelerated.

    Notable Point
  19. 48:13
    Renown trades machinery weight between speed and protection

    Four 850 psi boilers could give Renown more power than her historical eight-boiler reconstruction while letting designers preserve speed or deepen protection.

    Notable Point
  20. 50:26
    Town-class cruisers gain speed or range

    Town-class and smaller cruisers could use 850 psi plants for roughly 36-knot performance, longer range, or freed space for weapons and reconnaissance aircraft.

    Chapter
  21. 56:37
    Arethusa and Abdiel become Mediterranean speed tools

    The smaller Arethusa-class cruisers and speed-centered Abdiel minelayers could exploit the new plant especially well in Mediterranean scouting, raiding, and minelaying missions.

    Notable Point
  22. 57:11
    Yorktown and Enterprise under the same boiler revolution

    An Anglo-American project could let Yorktown and Enterprise reduce boiler count and redirect treaty-limited displacement toward armor and torpedo protection.

    Notable Point
  23. 58:24
    Japan and Italy face a new battleship speed floor

    If Anglo-American battleships make 28 knots the baseline, Yamato and Littorio designs may need more machinery, altered layouts, or a sharper redesign to preserve tactical speed advantages.

    Chapter
  24. 1:02:56
    A stronger fleet changes deterrence and destroyer design

    Fleet-wide adoption makes the prewar Royal Navy more formidable and gives Tribal-class destroyers choices between extreme power, fewer boilers, survivability, and added weapons.

    Chapter
  25. 1:05:33
    The Tribal class can trade power for survivability

    The Tribal-class design could pursue extreme shaft power or use a separated two-boiler plant that still improves performance while reducing single-hit vulnerability.

    Notable Point
  26. 1:08:39
    Protection, fuel, and speed reshape wartime options

    Machinery savings might improve Royal Oak's torpedo defense, release other capital ships from convoy duty, and make faster Mediterranean bombardment operations more practical.

    Notable Point
  27. 1:08:39
    A stronger Royal Navy alters the French-fleet risk

    Faster and more numerous British capital ships reduce the relative threat posed by Dunkerque-class ships and a potentially hostile French fleet after France falls.

    Notable Point
  28. 1:11:08
    Extra speed opens a surface-bombardment window at Taranto

    A 28-knot Queen Elizabeth-class force could approach and withdraw from Taranto faster, making a surface bombardment more plausible before daylight air attack.

    Notable Point
  29. 1:12:30
    Nelson refits compete with new construction

    The better machinery makes Nelson and Rodney candidates for modernization, but every refit consumes dockyard capacity that might otherwise build carriers or new capital ships.

    Notable Point
  30. 1:15:22
    The Deutschland class loses its niche

    Fast, long-ranged Anglo-American steam warships could quickly undermine the Deutschland class and reopen the efficiency comparison between boilers and diesels.

    Notable Point