Video
What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?
Study What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?, a Dr. Alex Clarke video from 20 Jun 2026, with 31 time notes. Topics include 15-inch Guns, Alternate History, Battlecruisers.
Time notes
- 0:37Tiger's beam leaves room to consider larger barbettesChapter
The proposed gun change requires wider barbettes, and Tiger's beam is almost identical to that of the 15-inch-armed Queen Elizabeth class.
- 1:32A rough hull comparison puts Tiger near existing 15-inch shipsNotable Point
Displacement divided by approximate hull area supplies a rough comparison for judging whether Tiger could support heavier guns.
- 4:42Tiger approaches the fast battleship from the battlecruiser sideNotable Point
Tiger and the Queen Elizabeth class represent two British routes toward combining battle-line strength with high speed.
- 6:08Tiger's trials and stability suggest scope for an oil-fired refitChapter
Trials speed, the 39-boiler plant, and deep-load stability provide the starting figures for Tiger's proposed machinery upgrade.
- 8:08Tiger adds substantial weight to a hull only slightly larger than Queen Mary'sNotable Point
Queen Mary, German construction, and Japan's Kongo class explain why Tiger's designers invested in a heavier ship.
- 9:35Jutland supplies combat evidence for Tiger's resilienceNotable Point
Tiger's heavy shell damage and rapid return to service provide a wartime test of the hull strength assumed by the refit scenario.
- 11:00Washington treaty rules block the historical Tiger gun changeChapter
Tiger fits the treaty's broad tonnage and caliber ceilings, but the reconstruction clause forbids changing her main-gun caliber or mounting type.
- 14:13Stored Courageous turrets show Britain's measured rearmament paceNotable Point
Stored 15-inch mountings from the Courageous-class conversions provide the hardware for an eight-gun ship and weaken claims of panicked rearmament.
- 14:59Internal supports determine how much armor a hull can carryNotable Point
Subdivision and strong internal construction provide support for heavier external armor.
- 18:29Tiger's strategic speed could put heavy guns at Singapore in timeChapter
Transit-time arithmetic shows why fast capital ships served as a deterrent and rapid-response force for Britain's Far Eastern commitments.
- 22:48The London treaty removes Tiger before her replacement is readyNotable Point
Tiger left service in 1931 as treaty tonnage was cleared for a new generation, but delays postponed the King George V class and left a capability gap.
- 24:50Frederick Field links design policy to worldwide force projectionChapter
Field's longer tenure and preference for F3 provide a policy setting in which a faster, more heavily armed Tiger could make sense.
- 27:18Why battlecruisers traded protection for strategic speedNotable Point
Strategic speed offered an alternative to expensive permanent forward deployment, while machinery limits constrained protection.
- 29:26Naval memoirs can obscure the work of subordinatesNotable Point
The criticism of Chatfield's treatment of Henderson raises a question about how command culture shapes autobiographical credit.
- 31:14Dispersed task groups need speed to support one anotherNotable Point
Backhouse and Field's interest in dispersed forces makes rapid reinforcement a reason to invest in fast capital ships.
- 32:07A 15-inch standardization bargain changes the treaty pathChapter
Britain could seek either an exemption for work already begun or a treaty bargain that traded 16-inch prestige for 15-inch fleet commonality.
- 34:23Standard displacement hides Tiger's full-load scaleNotable Point
Treaty figures omit fuel and feed water, so Tiger's declared 28,500 tons can coexist with an estimated 39,000 to 40,000 tons at full load.
- 38:00New boilers reshape Tiger's machinery layoutChapter
Oil firing and Nelson-era boilers could replace Tiger's 39-boiler plant with a much smaller, more powerful arrangement while freeing internal and deck space.
- 42:09Armor coverage matters alongside maximum thicknessNotable Point
Tiger's 9-inch belt and original structural integration offer a different protection tradeoff from Hood's thicker but later-added armor.
- 44:02A 1918 reconstruction could keep Tiger useful while new designs took shapeChapter
Delayed replacement designs and Tiger's age and service condition support treating the 1918 refit as a possible start for rearmament.
- 47:26Four fast ships support a deploy-train-refit cycleChapter
Tiger provides the fourth hull for sustainable deployments and could join Hood on the Empire cruise after improvements to endurance.
- 50:48Accepting Tiger may be cheaper than reopening the treaty bargainNotable Point
Treaty partners might tolerate a conversion already under way rather than risk British withdrawal or a demand for another new capital ship.
- 54:24Treaty tonnage could produce three or four F3-style capital shipsChapter
Giving up 16-inch guns could let Britain use its remaining treaty allowance for a larger family of fast 15-inch ships derived from F3 thinking.
- 57:12Tiger could test a 15-inch/50 before the F2 and F3 shipsNotable Point
Using rebuilt Tiger as a gun test bed links the immediate conversion to British work on fully armored battlecruisers and fast battleships.
- 58:57Two battle lines give Britain worldwide task-group depthNotable Point
Seven or eight fast capital ships create a second operational battle line with enough depth for simultaneous deployment, maintenance, and deterrence.
- 1:01:03Fleet depth supports faster Queen Elizabeth refits and live raider exercisesNotable Point
More fast hulls free older ships for speed-focused modernization and give training fleets realistic high-speed raiders to hunt.
- 1:01:54A larger fast fleet undermines the German Panzerschiff conceptChapter
Tiger and several fast Nelson- or F3-derived ships would multiply the British hunters able to catch and outgun German Panzerschiffe.
- 1:03:03Fast battleships alter Mediterranean operations and Denmark StraitChapter
A larger pool of 28-knot capital ships changes where Britain can accept risk and which heavy units can reach time-sensitive operations.
- 1:04:08A tentative King George V alternative uses twelve 15-inch gunsNotable Point
A proposed four-triple-turret arrangement shows how choosing 15-inch standardization could carry into a later battleship generation.
- 1:05:23A 24-knot fast force raises the carrier speed requirementNotable Point
Carriers supporting the fast capital ships must keep pace with a formation advancing near 24 knots instead of the traditional 18-knot battle line.
- 1:06:08An eighteen-ship fleet could support another battle squadronNotable Point
Ceylon or western India offers a politically Eastern but operationally flexible base for the extra squadron created by a larger treaty fleet.