Q&A · 7:42-8:09

Why Britain kept to carrier treaty limits

Openly exceeding national carrier tonnage would license every signatory to abandon the limits, while treaty compliance also suited Britain's spending restraint.

Question

Why did Britain keep to the treaty carrier limit when other powers were already bending the rules?

Short answer

An open breach would free every other navy to exceed its limits, and Britain still wanted the treaty's spending restraint.

Notes

Other powers bent treaty rules, but an openly excessive carrier count would be visible and easy to challenge. Once Britain broke the national limit, rival navies would gain political cover to do the same. British governments also used treaty compliance to restrain defense spending while directing money elsewhere. Arms-control credibility and domestic budget choices both mattered, so the carrier limit was more than a purely legal obstacle.