Video
Bruships 111: Random Books of History
Study Bruships 111: Random Books of History, a Dr. Alex Clarke video from 7 May 2023, with 69 time notes. Topics include Book Reviews, Live Q&A, Naval Historiography.
Time notes
- 10:39QuestionCould technology already available in Germany have made Graf Zeppelin operational much earlier?AnswerQ&A
Germany had relevant starting technologies, but naval versions still needed development, funding, and Luftwaffe cooperation.
- 16:31How Graf Zeppelin could change British carrier constructionNotable Point
An operational German carrier could strengthen the case for keeping British fleet carriers on schedule and change the later demand for light fleet carriers.
- 18:20Churchill's like-for-like naval procurement logicNotable Point
Churchill's procurement logic matched carriers with carriers and capital ships with capital ships, while using escorts against submarines.
- 19:45QuestionWould a German carrier have survived longer than Bismarck on its first sortie?AnswerQ&A
Probably not, because the Royal Navy would likely accept the risk of a night strike against a carrier even when it avoided that risk against Bismarck.
- 25:15QuestionHow many French battleships were operational when Germany invaded France in 1940?AnswerQ&A
Roughly six, depending on what standard is used for operational readiness.
- 28:19QuestionIs it unreasonable for historical rankings to place Brazil's navy near the top?AnswerQ&A
No. Brazil was once South America's strongest navy and at points even compared favorably with the United States.
- 33:44QuestionHow useful are D. K. Brown's naval-technology books?AnswerQ&A
They are excellent overviews, but individual conclusions still need checking against specifications and primary evidence.
- 38:06QuestionDid the absence of a major refit mean Hood's corrosion went untreated?AnswerQ&A
No. Dry docking, hull inspection, and repainting were routine maintenance performed between major refits.
- 41:11QuestionDoes the seriousness of corrosion depend on where it occurs?AnswerQ&A
Yes. Surface corrosion on thinner plating needs attention, but visible deterioration can be identified during regular inspections and repaired.
- 42:08QuestionWere Italian heavy cruisers good or bad designs?AnswerQ&A
The assessment is favourable compared with German heavy cruisers, though critical of Italy's limited gains from treaty evasion.
- 42:37QuestionCould continual repainting explain why Hood sat lower in the water?AnswerQ&A
It would require an enormous quantity of paint. Wartime water in torpedo-defence spaces is a more plausible explanation, although the cited book passage remains unchecked.
- 46:24QuestionWhy were Italian cruiser guns mounted so close together, and had shell interference escaped notice?AnswerQ&A
The compact arrangement helped preserve a narrow, fast hull, but it was less favorable for accuracy and gun survivability.
- 48:12QuestionDid water discharged through Rodney's stern increase her speed?AnswerQ&A
No. The reply instead recalls, with some uncertainty, that the commander in question never filled Rodney's torpedo defences with water.
- 48:30QuestionDid poor shell quality help drive Italian gunnery dispersion?AnswerQ&A
Yes. Inconsistent shell quality mattered, while political corruption is offered as an explanation for procurement failures.
- 49:35Why the Royal Navy renewed machinery so aggressivelyNotable Point
Worldwide deployment and salt-water exposure drove unusually intensive Royal Navy overhaul and machinery-renewal practices.
- 52:50Testing accounts of Hood against engineering evidenceNotable Point
Hood's reported defects need their severity and engineering context established before they can demonstrate that the ship was unfit for service.
- 56:56QuestionWhy was Victorious chosen to lead the angled-deck modernization instead of an Implacable-class carrier?AnswerQ&A
Victorious was expected to be the easier, faster example, with lessons from her conversion intended for the rest.
- 1:02:45Forth Bridge repainting and seasonal maintenanceNotable Point
Longer-lasting paint allows a break in Forth Bridge maintenance, with repainting arranged around seasonal working conditions.
- 1:03:16QuestionDid French ships significantly affect maritime operations during World War II?AnswerQ&A
Certainly before Operation Torch. The later period receives a more qualified answer.
- 1:07:36QuestionWhat is the naval equivalent of a World War II tank destroyer?AnswerQ&A
A specialized anti-submarine sloop or corvette, especially when paired with helicopters.
- 1:08:01QuestionDid sending a major warship for maintenance require unusual use of the First Sea Lord's authority?AnswerQ&A
No. Releasing an operational ship for scheduled maintenance was a normal transfer from First Sea Lord to Third Sea Lord authority.
- 1:10:35Britain's unresolved choice between maritime and continental strategyChapter
The British Way of War connects pre-1914 defence economies and the Anglo-French Entente to Britain's failure to settle its national strategy.
- 1:13:11George Clarke and Corbett's competing visions of national strategyNotable Point
George Clarke wanted the Committee of Imperial Defence to direct national strategy, while Corbett gave the resulting doctrine a different political character.
- 1:14:37The CID's attempt to direct defence policy across the servicesNotable Point
The Committee of Imperial Defence linked strategic direction to spending cuts, while proposed naval and military staff threatened existing service authority.
- 1:16:38Army opposition to a maritime strategy and civilian controlNotable Point
Army resistance to combined-operations planning accompanied a campaign for a larger conscript force and continental commitments.
- 1:18:16Corbett as a codifier of British maritime practiceNotable Point
Corbett's naval theory is interpreted as a statement of an established British strategic system.
- 1:19:28QuestionWas the Pensacola class designed to beat the Hawkins class?AnswerQ&A
Probably not. Hawkins does not appear in the Pensacola design histories recalled here, so a direct influence seems doubtful.
- 1:26:43QuestionHow would other navies react if Britain built forty County-class cruisers before the London Naval Treaty?AnswerQ&A
The United States would be concerned, but the largest effect would likely be higher treaty cruiser allowances and a larger Royal Navy cruiser force.
- 1:28:21Distributing County-class cruisers across the DominionsNotable Point
A forty-cruiser programme could support separate Australian, Canadian, New Zealand, South African, and Indian allocations while leaving Britain twenty-four ships.
- 1:32:25War Plan Orange's Central Pacific campaign studiesChapter
Studies of a progressive advance through Micronesia developed amphibious doctrine, target selection and advanced-base planning before World War II.
- 1:33:55The exposed supply line in War Plan Orange's rapid advanceNotable Point
A 1932 plan assumed dispersed supply ships could evade Japanese raiders without first securing the Micronesian island chain.
- 1:34:37Why War Plan Orange made secure bases a condition of advancingNotable Point
The revised Pacific advance treated bases in the Marshalls and Carolines as prerequisites for reaching the Philippines ready to fight.
- 1:37:54QuestionWould dispersed supply shipping invite coordinated attacks by raiders and submarines?AnswerQ&A
The quoted account appears to omit convoys altogether. Merchant ships should remain convoyed to protect them.
- 1:40:07The wider cruiser programme behind forty CountiesNotable Point
The forty-County figure sat inside a broader plan for new light cruisers, modernised older ships, and specialist or Dominion assignments.
- 1:48:07QuestionWhat would an additional 15-inch British battlecruiser have changed in World War I?AnswerQ&A
It would strengthen the battlecruiser force early and keep another major yard and skilled workforce available for further construction.
- 1:50:05QuestionDid cancellation of N3 and G3 reflect a failure by the Royal Navy?AnswerQ&A
No. Their cancellation was treated as a political and treaty decision.
- 1:50:32The Palau raids as a blow to Japanese sustainmentChapter
The Palau raids damaged shipping, oilers, repair capacity, and air power that Japan needed to sustain fleet operations.
- 1:53:06How Avengers mined Palau under fighter protectionNotable Point
Palau's harbour denial depended on difficult-to-sweep mines and coordinated fighter protection for vulnerable minelayers.
- 1:53:56After Palau: rebuilding air groups and preparing for the MarianasNotable Point
Japanese air groups began rebuilding while American commanders reorganised their Pacific forces and planned the Marianas campaign.
- 1:55:32QuestionCould the additional shipyard have survived into World War II?AnswerQ&A
Possibly, but it would have had to survive the recession, deliberate contraction of shipbuilding capacity, and wartime bombing.
- 1:56:41QuestionWhy did the United States and Japan keep armored cruisers longer than Britain?AnswerQ&A
They still needed the hulls for training and fleet duties, while Britain had enough newer cruisers and destroyers to replace them.
- 1:57:57QuestionWhat should Britain do if its entire pre-treaty warship industry and supply chain reappeared today?AnswerQ&A
Modernize the yards and retrain the workforce first, then place modern orders and use surplus capacity for exports.
- 1:59:30QuestionWas there more foreign influence behind the creation of Émile Bertin than is usually acknowledged?AnswerQ&A
Some British influence is plausible, while the ship remains a strong French design.
- 2:11:18QuestionHow would adding the N3 and G3 classes affect Royal Navy strategy?AnswerQ&A
Not radically: G3s would likely split between the Indian Ocean and Home Fleet, while N3s would divide between the Mediterranean and Home Fleets.
- 2:14:59Midway's withdrawal and the losses after the carrier battleChapter
The aftermath of Midway brought a cruiser collision, further air attacks, and a submarine attack that ended efforts to save Yorktown.
- 2:16:38Midway timing in Sea Battles in Close-UpChapter
An older Midway narrative attributes the outcome to reconnaissance delays, rearming decisions, and narrow opportunities to launch aircraft.
- 2:19:44QuestionWhat if the Washington treaty allowed every navy to keep all ships built after Dreadnought?AnswerQ&A
Many ships would still be discarded because permission to keep aging dreadnoughts did not make them affordable or useful.
- 2:20:41QuestionWould Tone's scout launching on time necessarily have produced an earlier Japanese sighting at Midway?AnswerQ&A
Not necessarily; several other chance movements and search decisions also determined who found whom and when.
- 2:21:31QuestionWhich older British ships would have been most useful to retain after 1921?AnswerQ&A
Modernized Town-class cruisers could have become capable, seaworthy ocean escorts.
- 2:23:57QuestionWhat if Britain transferred old dreadnoughts to Poland or Finland after World War I?AnswerQ&A
They would gain ships stronger than Germany's available force and probably Russia's, while needing further infrastructure and modernisation.
- 2:26:27Reviewing books written by friends fairlyNotable Point
Buying friends' books independently and raising serious faults privately are parts of a personal reviewing policy.
- 2:28:32The Glorious First of June through contemporary lettersChapter
Peter Hore's The Habit of Victory uses short contemporary accounts to show how strategy, exhaustion, combat experience, and personal news coexisted after the Glorious First of June.
- 2:32:37QuestionIf HMS Warspite had survived as a museum ship, where should she be displayed?AnswerQ&A
Probably Portsmouth Historic Dockyard, where she could be displayed alongside Victory and Warrior.
- 2:33:19QuestionCould enough support be raised to build a fully working third-rate or second-rate ship?AnswerQ&A
A third rate is potentially achievable if the supporting organisations can grow enough to undertake it.
- 2:41:36QuestionCould Britain have sold HMS Princess Royal to the Netherlands in 1921?AnswerQ&A
The proposed date is moved back to 1920 so that the transfer precedes the treaty agreement.
- 2:45:38Lexington and G3 were built around different missionsNotable Point
Lexington's cruiser-hunting and trade-protection mission required wide coverage, while G3 concentrated more armour and firepower.
- 2:48:24QuestionHow would navies react to a treaty cruiser with twelve 8-inch guns, 8 inches of armour, and 28 knots?AnswerQ&A
The combination would exceed treaty tonnage, so it would not qualify as the proposed treaty cruiser.
- 2:49:05QuestionWhy do modern English accounts use MN for French ships and KMS for German ships?AnswerQ&A
They are convenient nationality labels for English readers, not official prefixes of those navies.
- 2:50:06The Altmark affair: neutrality, prisoners, and interventionChapter
Altmark's shelter in Jossingfjord brought Norwegian neutrality into conflict with British demands to search for prisoners.
- 2:54:46Norwegian communications and changing orders at JossingfjordNotable Point
A shore telephone kept Norwegian commanders informed while orders to resist a British boarding were first issued and then withdrawn.
- 2:56:19A net intended for Altmark catches another German shipNotable Point
A British attempt to trap Altmark instead caught a German ore carrier, whose crew scuttled her before the destroyers could secure the ship.
- 2:58:14Churchill's boarding order limited force against NorwayNotable Point
Churchill ordered the prisoners' release if Norway would not accept a joint escort and guard, while restricting retaliation against Norwegian vessels.
- 2:59:46Cossack's searchlights and conflicting accounts of the Altmark affairNotable Point
Cossack's conspicuous approach began with navigational uncertainty, while later accounts increasingly disagreed about the confrontation.
- 3:05:11QuestionHow did the N3 and G3 compare as capital ships?AnswerQ&A
G3s were fast pursuit ships with battlecruiser characteristics, while N3s concentrated exceptional armour and firepower as the force's ultimate threat.
- 3:12:20QuestionWhich unbuilt cruiser designs are the most interesting?AnswerQ&A
British and French World War II studies stand out, alongside American pre-World War I concepts and unusually extreme Japanese proposals.
- 3:14:18QuestionWhat could replace torpedo mounts on American warships?AnswerQ&A
Additional 5-inch guns.
- 3:16:18QuestionWhat changes if 1980s nuclear strike ships are built and retained into the 2000s?AnswerQ&A
They would probably be redesignated as cruisers, and retaining them might sustain nuclear surface-warship production and make carriers cheaper.
- 3:22:04When North Atlantic specialisation becomes a weaknessNotable Point
A force optimized for open-ocean North Atlantic work can struggle when war shifts into enclosed coastal waters.
- 3:24:50QuestionWhen did unbroken decks and raised bows become normal in battleship design?AnswerQ&A
They were never universally normal; raised forecastles mainly reflect the need for seakeeping in rough operating areas such as the North Atlantic.