Q&A · 2:01:28-2:06:44

A Washington Treaty that forced every capital ship to be rebuilt

A clean-sheet treaty fleet would favour the country able to finance and build about fifteen new capital ships, with Britain centred on a faster Nelson-style design.

Question

What if the Washington Naval Treaty required every power to scrap all capital ships and build anew?

Short answer

Britain would be the likeliest power to fund a full replacement fleet, probably building about fifteen 28-knot Nelson-style ships while retiring older classes in stages.

Notes

A treaty requiring every power to scrap its capital ships would create a huge replacement burden. Britain is judged the most likely power to secure the necessary budget, with a programme of roughly fifteen new 35,000-ton ships based on a 28-knot Nelson or Rodney concept. Construction would replace the oldest 13.5-inch battleships first, followed by the Revenge and Queen Elizabeth classes. Renown, Repulse, and Hood would survive until the end of the sequence, making this counterfactual as much a test of finance and industrial capacity as of warship design.