Naval Historywith Dr. Alex

Topic

Nelson Class Battleships

Also searchable as Nelson Class.

Related time notes

  1. Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    56:58K2, K3 and the scale of the designs before NelsonQ&A
  2. What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?
    46:34Could extra time help the longer 15-inch gun?Notable Point
  3. Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    3:04:34Faster shells and shorter-range hit probabilityQ&A
  4. Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    14:34Giving William White the Nelson-class plans in 1895Q&A
  5. Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    3:46:53Nelson-class blast damage and training restrictionsQ&A
  6. Churchill's Good ideas: the actually good, the bad, and the ridiculous
    1:31:36F3 battlecruisers and the cancelled American capital shipsQ&A
  7. Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    15:06A 1938 speed refit for Nelson and RodneyQ&A
  8. Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:24:42Thunderer, Erin, and sailors' warship nicknamesQ&A
  9. Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:43:38Why Nelson and Rodney are so often misunderstoodQ&A
  10. Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:24:34From faster Orions to an early fast-battleship standardQ&A
  11. What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?
    38:00New boilers reshape Tiger's machinery layoutChapter
  12. What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?
    54:24Treaty tonnage could produce three or four F3-style capital shipsChapter
  13. What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?
    1:03:03Fast battleships alter Mediterranean operations and Denmark StraitChapter
  14. Bruships 236: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:38:10A larger treaty allowance for Nelsons, F3s and WashingtonNotable Point
  15. Bruships 235: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:51:02Why the Royal Navy did not fight to keep the Iron DukesQ&A
  16. What if the Royal Navy's Aircraft Carrier HMS Hermes had sisters in the 1920s? (Patreon Live)
    32:37Beatty's interwar procurement prioritiesNotable Point
  17. Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:11:35What removing Nelson's torpedoes could buyQ&A
  18. Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:12:47What does a submerged torpedo flat cost a battleship?Q&A
  19. Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:13:23Rodney's aluminium fittings and repeated wartime repairsNotable Point
  20. Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:06:52Why Nelson-class tanker decoys would not fool GermanyQ&A
  21. Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?
    58:28F3 appearance as a personal argument about naval presenceNotable Point
  22. Trumps Battleship; A Naval History view on what we know of the Defiant Class so far
    10:04Iowa-class design for task-group warfareChapter
  23. 3 Books to understand the USN, RN & IJN preperations for WWII! Key Books 3
    38:25Scheme J1's paper fleet for war with JapanChapter
  24. Scuttlebutt 13: Questions on Battleships
    34:20How machinery wear could change a battleship's usable speedNotable Point
  25. Scuttlebutt 13: Questions on Battleships
    35:00Nelson gun logistics and the F3 design boundaryNotable Point
  26. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle
    4:36:39If treaty powers had to buy capital ships from one anotherQ&A
  27. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon
    3:00:23Planning a three-week-warning Channel Dash interceptionQ&A
  28. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon
    5:32:34Nelson-class battleships would transform Falklands command and fire supportQ&A
  29. Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust
    5:10:04Which 1939 Royal Navy ships are worth duplicatingQ&A
  30. Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress
    5:57:41Forward gunfire and the Nelson turret arrangementNotable Point
  31. Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress
    7:30:25Why Nelson's forward magazine bulkhead matters to a damage modelNotable Point
  32. Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress
    11:43:31Nelsons and King George Vs in an American fleet scenarioQ&A
  33. Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida
    6:00:16What Britain might demand for additional treaty scrappingQ&A
  34. What happpens if Admiral "Jackie" Fisher & Admiral R.G.H Henderson Swap Third Sea Lord Tenures?
    1:29:23Gun upgrades or faster torpedo bombers define Fisher's fleetNotable Point
  35. Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?
    1:10:09British capital designs evolve by building batchNotable Point
  36. What if the High Seas Fleet was not Scuttled in Scapa Flow?
    48:12German technology sparks a naval construction boomChapter
  37. #2Historians Live: With @Drachinifel comes to chat & build UAD Dreadnoughts that Almost were P3
    32:08Italy's 1929 answer to the Nelson classChapter
  38. #2Historians Live: With @Drachinifel comes to chat & build UAD Dreadnoughts that Almost were P3
    2:37:30Why an archived warship design may never have been intended for constructionNotable Point
  39. Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:55:16A Nelson-style Scharnhorst and the problem of retreating fireQ&A
  40. #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?
    50:37Should Britain have chosen F3 instead of Nelson and Rodney?Q&A
  41. Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:50:07Six Nelsons under a twenty-capital-ship treatyQ&A
  42. Sir Eustace Tennyson d'Eyncourt: WWI Royal Navy's Director of Naval Construction
    59:35Nelson's 16-inch gun and the danger of a false test resultNotable Point
  43. Bruships 206: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    37:02A larger Royal Navy reshapes WashingtonQ&A
  44. Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:39:45A faster twelve-gun Nelson classQ&A
  45. Bruships 204: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:22:44Royal Navy capital ships replace the Pearl Harbor battle lineQ&A
  46. Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    5:16:38A faster four-shaft Nelson designQ&A
  47. Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:02:13How 850 psi machinery would change the Nelson designQ&A
  48. Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    6:03:03An 800-psi machinery plant for a Nelson successorQ&A
  49. Why didn't the Royal Navy go for High Pressure boilers & what if they got 850psi boilers in 1934?
    1:12:30Nelson refits compete with new constructionNotable Point
  50. Scuttlebutt 12: Not Pocket Battleships, No Guadalcanal and a load of Submarine Signals?
    58:00A 24-knot battle line would pressure British and American successorsNotable Point
  51. Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    36:02Refitting the Nelson class in 1937Q&A
  52. Scuttlebutt 11: from SDSR to Pearl Harbor, with a stop at CVA-01 along the way...
    37:45Why 25,000-ton battlecruisers were poor Revenge-class replacementsQ&A
  53. Scuttlebutt 11: from SDSR to Pearl Harbor, with a stop at CVA-01 along the way...
    42:47An F3-style alternative for Nelson and RodneyNotable Point
  54. Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:05:57Could Nelson and Rodney be redesigned for 28 knots?Q&A
  55. Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:23:21The case for arming the Nelson class with improved 15-inch gunsQ&A
  56. Scuttlebutt 21st Century Battleship: Chat & Comment Response...
    45:29Using water, coal, and machinery as protective depthNotable Point
  57. Dalrymple Hamilton: The Captain of HMS Rodney who believed she could be a destroyer
    54:15Nelson-class armour came at the price of speedNotable Point
  58. Dalrymple Hamilton: The Captain of HMS Rodney who believed she could be a destroyer
    57:07Why a speed-obsessed destroyer officer received HMS RodneyChapter
  59. Dalrymple Hamilton: The Captain of HMS Rodney who believed she could be a destroyer
    1:07:43Hull cleaning, speed, and the limits of inferenceNotable Point
  60. Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!
    3:22:07Manning an Incomparable-sized carrier in the 1920sQ&A
  61. 21st Century Battleship: What would a battleship built today need to be a battleship?
    1:07:51Large railguns, deep VLS, and distributed lethalityChapter
  62. Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...
    34:02The prestige cost of Nelson's 16-inch gunsQ&A
  63. Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...
    4:13:26Colorado and Nelson 16-inch guns comparedQ&A
  64. So you want to Build a Battleship today? For the 21st Century? Naval History Live
    10:27Define a modern battleship by mission, not turret countChapter
  65. Leadership Alive: What happens if Adm R. Henderson & Adm W. Fisher Live through WWII?
    1:15:28Slow warship construction preserved yards at a high priceNotable Point
  66. Bruships 187: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:49:39Where sabot rounds could help interwar naval gunsQ&A
  67. Bruships 187: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:57:25Specialized sabot rounds for battleships and destroyersNotable Point
  68. Mary Rose to Victory: How the Wooden Wall Grew as both forest and trees
    1:45:39First rates evolved from bastions to line-breakersNotable Point
  69. Bruships 186: Naval History Questions Answered Live...Restart 2!
    1:06:28Which warship designs aged worse than their contemporaries?Q&A
  70. Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:19:13A faster Nelson with 15-inch gunsQ&A
  71. Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...Part II
    1:53:53Why Nelson’s three turrets were not all superfiringQ&A
  72. Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...Part II
    2:43:16How quadruple turrets would change a Nelson-type battleshipQ&A
  73. Bruships 177: New Year, same Dr Alex... possibly with new gym membership
    1:36:39How fast Nelsons could destabilize the interwar treaty systemQ&A
  74. Bruships 177: New Year, same Dr Alex... possibly with new gym membership
    3:28:29Why Nelson's heavy conning tower represented an older battleship doctrineQ&A
  75. Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?
    2:04:17Nelson-class speed was not just an engine problemQ&A
  76. Battle of Elli(1912): When Regional Powers Go to War
    51:27All-forward guns can invert the logic of crossing the TNotable Point
  77. Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...
    13:03Nelson as the ultimate dreadnought battleshipChapter
  78. Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...
    26:54F2, F3, and Nelson trade speed against armorChapter
  79. Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...
    40:28The politics behind 'unsinkable bulwarks'Chapter
  80. Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...
    46:22A thousand tons could buy Nelson more speedNotable Point
  81. Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...
    57:25Competing Jutland reports and the case for F3Notable Point
  82. Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...
    2:52:54How tall was Nelson's armor belt?Q&A
  83. Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 2024
    1:31:00F3 machinery, two-shaft power, and the gap between peacetime and wartime speedQ&A
  84. Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?
    3:39:16Could Nelson and Rodney be made faster for an Italian threat?Q&A
  85. Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/4
    6:29:54Propellant chemistry, magazine heat, and G3 layoutQ&A
  86. Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/4
    7:24:50Nelson and Rodney as the pinnacle of the traditional dreadnoughtQ&A
  87. Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/4
    8:21:10Assessing the competition's modified F3 fast battleshipNotable Point
  88. Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax
    5:05:30A failed London treaty could revive the F3 battlecruiser conceptQ&A
  89. Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!
    2:10:34A 45,000-ton Washington treaty reshapes battleshipsQ&A
  90. Frigating Tiger Cubs: WWI if the Royal Navy builds some 9.2in armed 'Dreadnought Cruisers'
    2:09:31A higher treaty ceiling permits faster British battleshipsNotable Point
  91. Frigating Tiger Cubs: WWI if the Royal Navy builds some 9.2in armed 'Dreadnought Cruisers'
    2:16:40Interwar fleets adapt to a world full of Tiger CubsChapter
  92. Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...
    2:06:00Treaty tonnage produces faster capital shipsNotable Point
  93. Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...
    2:17:09Higher treaty tonnage reshapes carriers and capital shipsChapter
  94. Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...
    2:28:52Would alternate Nelsons keep 16-inch guns?Q&A
  95. Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song
    3:52:46A more capable Nelson-class design through the F3 alternativeQ&A
  96. Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....
    3:02:24Designing Nelson and Rodney as fast battlecruisersQ&A
  97. V.Adm Beatty is sent to Command the Mediterranean Battle Cruisers in 1914... Patreon 105
    2:11:49Would a longer-lived Beatty demand more battlecruisers?Q&A
  98. Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!
    1:42:47Fast Nelsons would reset the interwar battleship raceQ&A
  99. Bruships 160: Money for Kallax, Book Space ain’t Free! Naval History Questions & Chat...
    1:39:05A Nelson class built around 15-inch/50 gunsQ&A
  100. Laying Minefields in the Sky... Some WWII Rocketry and Supersized T-Shirt Cannons...
    15:32Nelson and Rodney carried rockets above their main gunsNotable Point
  101. Bruships 159: New Office - This may be quick, discord may work & I may not have a Pneumonia attack!
    1:34:01Seven Nelson-type battleships would reshape Mediterranean and Atlantic risksQ&A
  102. Scuttlebutt 4: A Wide Variety of Comments
    28:50Why rebuilding an old battleship cannot be reduced to horsepowerQ&A
  103. Scuttlebutt 4: A Wide Variety of Comments
    36:16Warspite's refit produced more power from fewer boilersNotable Point
  104. Sōryū/Hiryū Class… Breaking into the future? Key Ships Series 9, Ships 5
    37:32Treaty limits, paper ships, and design workaroundsNotable Point
  105. Fisher's Furious Flying off Ships: Courageous Class built as Aircraft Carriers
    1:24:28A 35,000-ton carrier ceiling drives bigger battleshipsNotable Point
  106. Scuttlebutt 2: H Class Battleships, Japanese Carrier Aircraft Design and lots more
    1:25:31Five fast Nelson-style ships in the Tillman treaty scenarioQ&A
  107. Bruships 154: Ship-Shape's Scandi Ship 2024... answering naval history questions...
    2:18:45Three British treaty replacements: battleships or battlecruisers?Q&A
  108. Hearts of Oak: First Rate Ships of the Line - Key Ships Series 9, Ships 2
    25:03Nelson, Rodney, and the battle-line bulwark analogyNotable Point
  109. Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote
    2:14:49Why N3 and G3 would change later superstructuresQ&A
  110. Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends
    2:57How the G3 and N3 designs influenced later battleshipsQ&A
  111. Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends
    3:02:08A four-shaft Nelson-class design at 28 knotsQ&A
  112. Patreon 102: Zeroes over the Med! Japan joins the Britain & Free powers on 25th of June 1940...
    2:48:10Would Japanese reinforcements let Hood enter refit?Q&A
  113. Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed
    3:00:38Nine fast Queen Elizabeths and the Washington treatyQ&A
  114. Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed
    3:54:42Nelson and Rodney as a British treaty conditionQ&A
  115. Suggest Series Name Please: Comment Response video with a twist
    10:21Why battleship turret count affected survivabilityQ&A
  116. Bruships 144: Some Books(Can't Find Lego Cam Sorry) & Naval History Questions
    23:43What Nelson and Rodney taught the Royal Navy about all-forward gunsQ&A
  117. Bruships 144: Some Books(Can't Find Lego Cam Sorry) & Naval History Questions
    55:09How triple turrets saved crew and displacement in the Nelson classQ&A
  118. Bruships 144: Some Books(Can't Find Lego Cam Sorry) & Naval History Questions
    1:07:59The hidden thousand-ton cost of Nelson's torpedoesQ&A
  119. Bruships 144: Some Books(Can't Find Lego Cam Sorry) & Naval History Questions
    1:36:20Why a 1930 world war begins with Royal Navy dominanceQ&A
  120. The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!
    1:10:33Why Britain might return to the 15-inch gunNotable Point
  121. The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!
    1:11:00Did Nelson and Rodney use the G3 battlecruiser's gun?Q&A
  122. The Royal Navy's Forgotten Lost Battleship Generation: Key Ship Series 8 - Ships 6
    15:18The 1927 designs search for a minimum viable battleshipChapter
  123. Patreon 99: What would Imperial Star Destroyers look if designed by 1938 USN, RN, KM, IJN, RM & SN?
    33:51Why Warspite replaced Nelson in the British Star Destroyer conceptNotable Point
  124. Patreon 99: What would Imperial Star Destroyers look if designed by 1938 USN, RN, KM, IJN, RM & SN?
    2:05:23A 15-inch/50 alternative to Nelson's 16-inch batteryNotable Point
  125. Fairey Fulmar: innate soundness and competence but not the stuff of headlines
    10:38Why 1939 equipment should be judged against 1939 conditionsNotable Point
  126. Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London
    39:55Project 21 becomes a slower Soviet NelsonChapter
  127. Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London
    1:50:50A new 15-inch gun offers an alternative to Nelson's armamentNotable Point
  128. Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!
    28:09Why a 24.5-inch torpedo remained too heavy for destroyersQ&A
  129. Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!
    1:29:23Battleship torpedoes guaranteed a way to finish a disabled enemyQ&A
  130. Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!
    1:33:38Heavier Nelson shells would require a deliberate gun reworkQ&A
  131. Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty
    58:18A treaty ceiling redirects British gun developmentNotable Point
  132. Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty
    1:00:48Britain answers with faster Nelson alternativesChapter
  133. Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty
    1:21:36Continuous construction builds a faster wartime fleetChapter
  134. Patreon 98: The World Spins on a Coin: The February Revolution Fails & Imperial Russia survives WWI
    2:10:02Britain's 1930s fleet without the historical treaty pauseChapter
  135. Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered
    15:27Nelson and Rodney as the wrong ships for a mobile fleetQ&A
  136. Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered
    38:24A faster Nelson class with triple 15-inch turretsQ&A
  137. Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...
    1:33:31Britain can build a squadron of F3-like fast battleshipsChapter
  138. Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...
    3:03:15All-forward guns save weight but concentrate riskQ&A
  139. Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!
    1:20:13How an F3 layout could produce a faster NelsonQ&A
  140. Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered
    1:47:59A 45,000-ton F3-style Nelson classQ&A
  141. Naval History Writing Competition 2023/2024
    11:51Choosing the F3 design instead of Nelson and RodneyNotable Point
  142. Naval History Writing Competition 2023/2024
    18:08Following other navies' reactions to one changed programChapter
  143. Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time
    48:57A two-calibre treaty forces every navy into awkward compromisesQ&A
  144. Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time
    3:08:36An F3 layout creates a recognizable British capital-ship familyQ&A
  145. Patreon 94: The different types of Aircraft Carriers/Seaplane Carriers/Hybrids
    23:16Could surplus capital-ship turrets arm new cruisers?Q&A
  146. Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books
    19:23If every treaty navy received two new battleshipsQ&A
  147. Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books
    35:43How a lighter Nelson design could reach 28 knotsQ&A
  148. Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books
    2:21:40Nelson's high secondary mounts began with a dual-purpose ideaQ&A
  149. The Philosophy behind Autoloader Development for Navies
    23:11British interwar research tests automated heavy gunsChapter
  150. Operation Frankton: The Cockleshell Heroes
    18:59Why bomber-versus-battleship arithmetic misled plannersNotable Point
  151. Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!
    58:38The Royal Navy's most powerful commissioned battleshipQ&A
  152. Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!
    1:05:13Why European rivals did not simply outgun NelsonQ&A
  153. Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!
    1:37:18How Nelson's torpedoes could be aimedQ&A
  154. Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History
    50:38British battleship autoloader concepts from F2 to King George VChapter
  155. Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History
    54:49Did Nelson's assisted loading anticipate Vanguard?Q&A
  156. Scharnhorst Class(1936): Most Valued Player of the German Capital Ships - Key Ships Series 7 Ship 4
    42:21Why speed bought a surface raider timeNotable Point
  157. Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out
    28:22Shrinking L3 and K3 ideas into a treaty battleshipQ&A
  158. Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out
    1:53:40Britain had the beginnings of a 16-inch Mark II battery for VanguardNotable Point
  159. Operation Berlin: Tour De Force or Tour De Farce?
    1:25:00Rodney nearly caught GneisenauChapter
  160. Bruships 131: Battleships...
    1:10:49The updated Nelson alternative to King George VQ&A
  161. Dante Alighieri: Not Dreadnought but still an Inferno - Key Ships Series 7, Ship 1
    28:44Why Italy discarded Dante Alighieri in 1928Chapter
  162. A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy
    1:39:30Why all-forward guns suit a modernized battleshipNotable Point
  163. HMS Dreadnought: Key Ship Series 1 Ship 1 Comment Response
    56:27Oil firing and an alternate fast-battleship fleetQ&A
  164. Bruships 129: Travels, Rememberance & Questions from Chat
    1:05:28The US Navy considered an all-aft batteryQ&A
  165. The Sydney Strategy: What if the British Empire Far East Base was Sydney not Singapore
    44:03Sydney adds eleven days to the fleet's deploymentNotable Point
  166. Patreon 88: Sydney Strategy: When looking for a Far East Naval Base - what if Sydney not Singapore?
    1:11:05Why Nelson and Rodney remain unchangedNotable Point
  167. Patreon 88: Sydney Strategy: When looking for a Far East Naval Base - what if Sydney not Singapore?
    1:24:19Earlier high-pressure steam reshapes capital-ship refitsNotable Point
  168. Patreon 88: Sydney Strategy: When looking for a Far East Naval Base - what if Sydney not Singapore?
    2:13:10Could Nelson be refitted with triple 15-inch turrets?Q&A
  169. Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare
    1:22:39The King George V class already approached 35,000 tonsQ&A
  170. Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty
    41:02A Royal Navy programme that sustains shipbuildingChapter
  171. What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...
    38:55G3 and N3 at opposite ends of the capital-ship spectrumChapter
  172. What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...
    45:35Hood, G3, and the meaning of battlecruiserNotable Point
  173. Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty
    59:15How extra tonnage could produce a 28-knot Nelson-type battleshipNotable Point
  174. Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty
    3:38:20Would Britain's larger cruisers copy Renown, Hood, or Nelson?Q&A
  175. Bruships 124: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series
    57:42Alternative names for Nelson and RodneyQ&A
  176. Ranging & Stabilising: How Gunnery Evolved from 1860 to 1960
    1:08:29Ship stability was a gunnery requirementChapter
  177. Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics
    1:12:12An F3-style Nelson under a 42,000-ton treaty limitQ&A
  178. Bruships: Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!
    2:55:37What a prepared 1916 Dardanelles assault requiredQ&A
  179. Bruships: Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!
    3:21:00A faster Nelson under a 40,000-ton treatyQ&A
  180. King George V(1911) Class: Why the Orion Class didn't stick as 'Super Dreadnoughts'
    25:13Treaty-era presence missions and worldwide serviceChapter
  181. Being the Benchmark Navy: It has Costs as well as Benefits
    41:15Could battlecruisers replace the battleship benchmark?Notable Point
  182. Battleships of the Treaty Era
    41:30Nelson and Rodney as an industrial bridgeNotable Point
  183. Battleships of the Treaty Era
    45:10A faster 15-inch-gun Nelson alternativeNotable Point
  184. Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!
    1:12:28The first triple-turret battleship built in a British yardQ&A
  185. Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!
    1:42:09How fast French and Italian ships could reshape Britain's treaty fleetQ&A
  186. HMS Incomparable: When Jackie Fisher Dreamed to Big - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 8
    28:19Fast 15-inch ships or armoured 16-inch bulwarksNotable Point
  187. H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 4
    0:01Paper strength versus industrial realityChapter
  188. H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 4
    11:13Four main-battery calibres for ten battleshipsChapter
  189. H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 4
    32:24Four shafts spread sustained-speed loadsNotable Point
  190. Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?
    2:51:04F3 speed and protection within the treaty limitChapter
  191. Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?
    3:05:12Eight guns or nine in a Nelson successor?Notable Point
  192. Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer
    29:00Why re-gunning the Nelson class means rebuilding the turretsQ&A
  193. Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer
    2:00:42What a higher treaty limit could do to Nelson and RodneyQ&A
  194. Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer
    3:31:44How unused Nelson-class tonnage affected a wartime pursuitNotable Point
  195. Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer
    3:34:09How a third propeller shaft could fit the Nelson classQ&A
  196. Sovetsky Soyuz (Советский Союз) Class: Stalin's Battleship Dreams - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 3
    1:03:20Could Project 21 have been a more realistic Soviet start?Notable Point
  197. Governments of the Washington Treaty: What were their priorities?
    3:29:28What a 7:10 Japanese ratio might have builtNotable Point
  198. Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture
    1:38:34The missed opportunity for a common improved British 15-inch gunQ&A
  199. Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture
    2:13:42When could early gas turbines have reached Hood?Q&A
  200. Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture
    2:32:51Testing hypothetical gas-turbine machinery in cruisers firstQ&A
  201. Montana Class, The Bulwarks for the New Battle Line: Key Ship Series 4, Part 2
    45:13What a Montana-Yamato duel cannot showNotable Point
  202. Testing out Lion Class & Potential Lion Class Successors on UAD
    26:39Why Nelson and Rodney look so unusualQ&A
  203. Testing out Lion Class & Potential Lion Class Successors on UAD
    28:46Favourite ships open two revealing design counterfactualsQ&A
  204. Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy
    6:42What counted as an advanced interwar battleshipQ&A
  205. Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy
    40:29Making blast-damaged equipment serviceableQ&A
  206. Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?
    2:14:04Designing treaty ships for rapid wartime completionQ&A
  207. Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?
    3:12:46Using Nelson's treaty margin for speed and better gunsQ&A
  208. Patreon 80: The most annoying & damaging 'myths' about the Royal Navy in the Treaty Years & WWII?
    1:04:52Could Britain have chosen two G3s instead of Nelson and Rodney?Q&A
  209. Stalins Dream Fleets & the Potential Responses
    48:02How a stronger Soviet fleet could reshape NATO commitmentsNotable Point
  210. Bruships 114: Alternate Histories, What Ifs & Questions from Chat
    2:29:13Why Nelson should standardize her dual-purpose batteryQ&A
  211. Günther Lütjens, useful idiot or misunderstood leadership?
    2:04:24Could new boilers have made the Nelson class much faster?Q&A
  212. Günther Lütjens, useful idiot or misunderstood leadership?
    2:21:02Would a third shaft for Nelson and Rodney have required thinner armour?Q&A
  213. An Imperial Navy start... this can not end well...
    3:21:20Why a fast 14-inch salvo could still be decisiveNotable Point
  214. Francesco Caracciolo Class Battleships: Key Ships Series 2, Ship 6
    3:37A 28-knot challenge in the MediterraneanNotable Point
  215. Francesco Caracciolo Class Battleships: Key Ships Series 2, Ship 6
    16:51How Italian speed could ripple through three fleetsChapter
  216. Building a NelRod County Class...
    1:59:39Scaling the forward-gun idea into an 18-inch battleshipChapter
  217. Bruships 112: Julian Corbett
    55:23Why limited firing arcs matter more at short rangeQ&A
  218. Saint Names for G3s & N3s
    3:03Why admiral names fit the G3 and N3 lineageChapter
  219. Saint Names for G3s & N3s
    4:50Ship names as Royal Navy strategic messagingNotable Point
  220. Bruships 111: Random Books of History
    42:37Could repeated painting make Hood sit lower in the water?Q&A
  221. G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 3
    2:36The missing generation between Hood and NelsonChapter
  222. G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 3
    11:28G3 speed, range, and uncertain performance marginsNotable Point
  223. Chilean Civil War & the sinking of the Blanco Encalada
    1:13:25Why early steam warships often had two shaftsQ&A
  224. Chilean Civil War & the sinking of the Blanco Encalada
    1:16:35Would five shafts make Nelson or Rodney faster?Q&A
  225. Empire Total War Twitch Stream 9(April 2023)
    1:14:57If Nelson and Rodney had been fast battleshipsQ&A
  226. Royal Navy retains the 'Fleet Units' of Royal Naval Air Service in 1918 - an Alternate History
    1:31:57Naval constructors designed around treaty accountingNotable Point
  227. Royal Navy retains the 'Fleet Units' of Royal Naval Air Service in 1918 - an Alternate History
    1:43:56Mediterranean success redistributes British capital shipsNotable Point
  228. Bruships 108: PLanned for Random Books off the Shelf & Chat
    1:50:12What more power could have done for Nelson and RodneyQ&A
  229. Bruships 106: Song Dynasty & Three New Books from Pen & Sword
    1:08:48Global logistics worked against Britain's 24.5-inch torpedoQ&A
  230. Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?
    1:12:46Shell testing also raises the standard for armourNotable Point
  231. A potential American Response to the 18in HMS Agincourt?
    1:09:23Pagoda masts and the logic of visual identificationNotable Point
  232. UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas
    1:15:08Could the design use larger torpedoes?Q&A
  233. UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas
    2:01:48Trading shell weight for interwar gun rangeNotable Point
  234. Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response
    1:42:47Why three turrets remained unattractive to British battleship designersQ&A
  235. Patreon 72: If Jan 1939 Tsingtao incident leads to war, how does RN carrier force fair against IJN?
    3:26:13Which capital ships retire after the Pacific war?Q&A
  236. Admirals, Lexingtons & Tosa; What if the Washington Naval Treaty built them?
    27:18The revised fleet lists let every navy claim a victoryNotable Point
  237. Bruships 99: Political History, Geostrategic History & Naval History
    3:17:05The F3 design and an all-15-inch Royal Navy battlefleetQ&A
  238. Bruships 99: Political History, Geostrategic History & Naval History
    3:22:48Why a twelve-gun 15-inch Nelson was not the likely alternativeQ&A
  239. Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-65
    48:50Existing 4.7-inch weapons exposed a missed opportunityNotable Point
  240. Bruships 97: Random Books, Naval Chat & Possibly the Sound of Rain
    2:50:25Nelson and Rodney were treaty products, not pre-treaty survivorsNotable Point
  241. New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...
    2:17:48Nelson and Rodney guns could arm a postwar capital shipQ&A
  242. Patreon 68: What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    1:18:52Why Nelson kept her 4.7-inch batteryQ&A
  243. Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat
    25:34Why the Nelson-class triple turrets needed refinementQ&A
  244. Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat
    46:58Nelson and Rodney as torpedo-defense benchmarksQ&A
  245. Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat
    2:05:03Different requirements favor Nelson, Queen Elizabeth, or IowaQ&A
  246. Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat
    2:13:51From Nelson to King George V hull formsQ&A
  247. Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response
    42:02Rodney's 16-inch guns in the last battle of BismarckNotable Point
  248. Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response
    42:39Would removing Nelson's torpedo-defense spaces save weight?Q&A
  249. Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response
    1:04:03How Japan accounted for Nelson and RodneyQ&A
  250. Washington Cheaties: Comment Response
    47:17Would a 15-inch/50 F3 derivative have been a super-Hood?Q&A
  251. Washington Cheaties: Comment Response
    55:43What a 38,000-ton Nelson built around the F3 layout might offerQ&A
  252. Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships
    0:18Nelson as the product of Britain's capital-ship research programChapter
  253. Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships
    18:39The Washington Treaty squeezes Britain's battle lineChapter
  254. Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships
    28:53Why 16-inch prestige defeated the faster F3Chapter
  255. Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships
    34:56How Nelson's all-forward layout saved weightNotable Point
  256. Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships
    39:39Nelson's compact machinery and disputed top speedNotable Point
  257. Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships
    41:57Nelson's water-filled underwater protectionNotable Point
  258. Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships
    43:15Chatham trials put Nelson's torpedo defense under full-scale blastNotable Point
  259. Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships
    44:18Why water counted as cheap treaty protectionNotable Point
  260. Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships
    45:15Nelson and Rodney as wartime heavy hittersNotable Point
  261. Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships
    48:26Why Nelson's treaty engineering irritated Admiral KingNotable Point
  262. Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships
    52:12Nelson's treaty margin and the Lexington comparisonNotable Point
  263. Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships
    53:40Nelson as the home-fleet apex behind Hood's prestigeNotable Point
  264. Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships
    55:13Why two treaty battleships could not fill Britain's global stationsNotable Point
  265. Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?
    1:27:27Was Nelson's Queen Anne's Mansion designed against gas?Q&A
  266. Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?
    1:43:42The firing-arc penalty of Nelson's compressed turret arrangementNotable Point
  267. Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?
    1:48:21What Nelson carried at 33,800 tonsChapter
  268. Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?
    1:57:20How Nelson's machinery was squeezed under the treaty limitChapter
  269. Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?
    2:03:03Why Nelson and Rodney remained fleet insurance in World War IIChapter
  270. Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?
    2:07:58Why were Nelson and Rodney unusually hard to disable?Q&A
  271. Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?
    2:20:15Why was battleship fire control so difficult to armour?Q&A
  272. Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?
    2:24:46How did Nelson's armour compare with the other Big Seven?Q&A
  273. Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?
    2:25:54How Queen Anne's Mansion made Nelson a fleet flagshipNotable Point
  274. Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?
    2:38:40Where did Nelson and Rodney serve late in the Second World War?Q&A
  275. Bruships 92: New Books, Naval Chat and Late 19th Century Warships...
    2:18:01How the Royal Navy might spend 80,000 extra treaty tonsQ&A
  276. Washington "Cheaties'': an Inevitability of Winning a Treaty
    41:20A 40,000-ton ceiling could reduce incentives to cheatChapter
  277. Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"
    2:55:27Nelson and Rodney stayed below the treaty ceiling yet used water as protectionChapter
  278. Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"
    2:59:27A 28-knot Rodney could reshape German battleship developmentQ&A
  279. Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"
    3:19:04Why the Royal Navy did not adopt a 50-caliber 15-inch gunQ&A
  280. Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"
    3:22:33Could a 15-inch/50 fit a Nelson-class barbette?Q&A
  281. Bruships 90: Books From the Road
    24:20What 42,000 tons could add to the Nelson designQ&A
  282. Bruships 90: Books From the Road
    3:37:43G3 and N3 layouts complicated anti-aircraft fire but did not prevent adaptationQ&A
  283. Bruships 90: Books From the Road
    3:45:26N3 would likely evolve toward Nelson's layout in a no-treaty arms raceQ&A
  284. Bruships 90: Books From the Road
    3:54:40Bismarck alone could not deter the Royal Navy battle lineQ&A
  285. Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 4
    44:28Without a battleship holiday, King George V evolves from NelsonQ&A
  286. Shortcomings with the designs of 'Early' Aircraft Carriers: Patreon 65
    2:16:23Would a Nelson-class carrier conversion make sense?Q&A
  287. Bruships 88: Way of War
    1:42:30How a 28-knot Nelson class changes fleet operationsQ&A
  288. Bruships 88: Way of War
    1:57:45A 28-knot Nelson in the Bismarck chaseNotable Point
  289. Bruships 88: Way of War
    2:03:58How faster Nelsons constrain Scharnhorst and GneisenauQ&A
  290. Bruships 88: Way of War
    4:02:22Could the Nelson class standardize on 15-inch guns?Q&A
  291. Epic Blunders of Naval History
    39:06Treaty persistence and Germany's missing fleet infrastructureChapter
  292. Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 64
    1:38:38A 40,000-ton Nelson becomes an early fast battleshipQ&A
  293. Brooklyn Class: The Not Quite Last US Treaty Era Cruisers
    7:03Why Brooklyn's firing arcs make less sense for Nelson and RodneyNotable Point
  294. Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 3
    7:57Testing Izumo's all-forward battleship layoutQ&A
  295. Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 3
    14:48Why Nelson and Rodney were the best postwar retention candidatesQ&A
  296. Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 2
    15:44Lion-class battleship guns and turret designQ&A
  297. Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 2
    1:20:58Could Nelson fire Lion-class 16-inch shells?Q&A
  298. Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 2
    1:56:47Introducing Nelson and Rodney twenty years earlyQ&A
  299. Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 2
    2:20:47Richelieu in the Denmark Strait approachQ&A
  300. Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out
    2:05:49Britain's unrealized 24-inch torpedo potentialQ&A
  301. Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-40
    29:26The Nelson class was strong but too slowQ&A
  302. Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-40
    35:56Which battleships could defeat a NelsonQ&A
  303. Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-40
    41:23An alternative turret arrangement for the Nelson classQ&A
  304. Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-40
    52:02Why hunting a crippled Nelson would not repeat the Bismarck chaseQ&A
  305. Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-40
    58:28Nelson's stern flow made a Bismarck-style rudder hit unusually difficultQ&A
  306. Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-40
    1:51:30Royal Navy heavy gunfire shaped fighting along the North African coastNotable Point
  307. Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times
    16:25Raven and Roberts on British battleship designChapter
  308. Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times
    24:47Why an export Nelson would alarm the United StatesQ&A
  309. Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times
    1:30:23A slow Japanese Nelson becomes a home-islands battleshipQ&A
  310. Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times
    1:46:29What 15-inch guns could buy G3 and Nelson designersQ&A
  311. Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times
    3:05:03Replacing a wrecked Revenge under treaty rulesQ&A
  312. Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times
    3:13:53Three shafts unlock a genuinely fast Nelson derivativeQ&A
  313. Bruships 82: New Books, Fun Books & Random Books
    48:48A faster Nelson and Rodney under a looser treaty limitNotable Point
  314. Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today
    39:06Doug Clarke's theoretical battlecruiser drawingsQ&A
  315. Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack
    2:02:49Keeping Lexington-class battlecruisers at WashingtonQ&A
  316. Patreon 56: Why Retire Admirals in a World War? (Live)
    2:06:23How HMS Rodney found unexpected speedQ&A
  317. Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)
    23:25Two early battleships as industrial insuranceChapter
  318. Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)
    31:05Capital-ship limits and replacement agesNotable Point
  319. Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)
    24:53King George V armament and the 15-inch alternativeNotable Point
  320. Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)
    50:53Why smaller battleships do not automatically buy an extra hullNotable Point
  321. Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)
    1:09:28All-forward armament concentrates damage riskNotable Point
  322. My Royal Navy Washington Treaty Cruiser: with added Qs from "1939 Destroyer Doctrine" (Long Patrol)
    0:10Why the County class was not the only treaty-cruiser answerChapter
  323. 2022 Canada Naval History Trip Reading List (Long Patrol Book Review)
    9:36Treaty-era designs after WashingtonChapter
  324. County Cruisers P8: The County Class in War and Retrospect (Long Patrol)
    10:35Treaty ceilings distorted cruiser designChapter
  325. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)
    33:38The F3 as a fast Nelson-style favouriteQ&A
  326. Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...
    4:59Could Rodney have been fast enough for the Bismarck chase?Q&A
  327. The Maple Confrontation (Equitable Washington Treaty Scenario): UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)
    1:00:01What extra treaty tonnage does for a Nelson-type shipNotable Point
  328. County Cruisers P7: The Canaris Class (Long Patrol)
    0:31Why Britain and Spain relied on cruisers overseasChapter
  329. County Cruisers P7: The Canaris Class (Long Patrol)
    36:30Spain had treaty freedom to protect its two flagshipsNotable Point
  330. County Cruisers P6: York, Exeter & The Cut Price County Concept (Long Patrol)
    1:38Efficient layouts existed beyond cutting down a CountyNotable Point
  331. Bruships 75: Following the 614th Running the Gauntlet
    4:00Yamato's speed advantage over Nelson and RodneyQ&A
  332. Bruships 75: Following the 614th Running the Gauntlet
    11:46Faster Nelson successors against Axis battleshipsNotable Point
  333. Battle of Singapore Straits (Equitable Washington Treaty Scenario): A UAD Infused(Long Patrol)
    39:55Cruising speed turns endurance into strategyNotable Point
  334. British Light Cruisers & Treaties: A UAD Infused discussion
    0:48Treaty limits and the grey areaChapter
  335. British Light Cruisers & Treaties: A UAD Infused discussion
    23:41The steady drumbeat of naval ordersChapter
  336. An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)
    14:31When impractical limits make evasion normalNotable Point
  337. An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)
    30:29A Royal Navy of early fast battleshipsNotable Point
  338. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)
    8:39How Nelson and Rodney alarmed the United StatesQ&A
  339. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)
    34:42A 1936 fast battleship using Nelson's 16-inch gunsQ&A
  340. A Rumble in the Tumble: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)
    53:35Dreadnought moves killing power to the main batteryNotable Point
  341. Anglo Japanese War: If Tsingtao caused a war in January 1939 (Comment Response)
    21:52Why propose a 40,000-ton treaty limit?Q&A
  342. Patreon 48: Anglo-Japanese War in Feb 39 - if Tsingtao Incident goes "hot", what's IJN doctrine?
    2:16:29Cunningham and the first fleet to SingaporeChapter
  343. If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion
    9:10Designing a faster, larger NelsonChapter
  344. Bruships 73: Some Old, Some New, None Borrowed, but Some Blue
    1:05:40How a two-ship class distorted the Nelson design compromiseNotable Point
  345. Battle Cruiser Squadron Action: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)
    29:29Why Britain did not extend its 24-inch torpedo to destroyersChapter
  346. Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World
    1:00:24Trading Hood for a larger treaty battle lineQ&A
  347. Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World
    1:13:32Why a larger Nelson class could trade armour for speedQ&A
  348. Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World
    3:02:36A 1930s nuclear capital-ship counterfactualQ&A
  349. Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World
    3:44:49Why Britain's heaviest hammers could not replace HoodNotable Point
  350. Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World
    3:58:14The hull extension needed for faster NelsonsNotable Point
  351. What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)
    0:51Trading older capital ships for new constructionChapter
  352. What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)
    5:22A 28-knot alternative to Nelson and RodneyChapter
  353. What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)
    20:24Procurement is about a fleet, not one shipChapter
  354. What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)
    25:54The machinery route to 28 knotsNotable Point
  355. What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)
    32:57How turret layout changes the forward firing arcNotable Point
  356. What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)
    40:16Why a two-ship pair produces a different designChapter
  357. What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)
    44:21Why treaty-maximum guns made the pair preciousNotable Point
  358. Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment
    2:29:03Why Nelson's third turret was not superfiringQ&A
  359. All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)
    39:05Why two Nelsons demanded an unusually protected designChapter
  360. All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)
    41:11Nelson's bow-on geometry and three kinds of efficiencyNotable Point
  361. All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)
    44:25Nelson's magazine, machinery, and two-shaft sequenceNotable Point
  362. All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)
    45:03A faster three-shaft Nelson alternativeNotable Point
  363. All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)
    50:35Why crossing the T could be dangerous against NelsonNotable Point
  364. All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)
    52:03Nelson's compartmentalization made alternative tradeoffs visibleNotable Point
  365. All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)
    57:22How availability shaped Nelson's design prioritiesNotable Point
  366. All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)
    1:33:06Commander skill makes forward armament payNotable Point
  367. All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)
    1:35:55Why class size changes acceptable design riskNotable Point
  368. Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament
    5:40Were G3 and N3 the parents of Nelson and Rodney?Q&A
  369. Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament
    17:07Why the Royal Navy did not build faster Nelson repeatsQ&A
  370. Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament
    20:05Would a transom stern have made Nelson faster?Q&A
  371. Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament
    26:07Would a transom stern save much weight on Nelson?Q&A
  372. Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament
    50:49Compact armour and a hypothetical fight with YamatoNotable Point
  373. Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament
    55:29Rodney's freedom to manoeuvre against BismarckNotable Point
  374. Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament
    1:10:44Could destroyers exploit an all-forward battleship?Q&A
  375. Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament
    1:12:54Could a rebuilt G3 move its middle turret?Q&A
  376. Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament
    1:15:28How faster Nelsons could reshape the battle fleetNotable Point
  377. Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament
    1:17:03Chatfield, gun policy, and the turn away from NelsonQ&A
  378. Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament
    1:34:00Could deleting Nelson's torpedoes fund more speed?Q&A
  379. Bruships 71: Hobbs on the Fleet Air Arm in Europe & Other cool books
    2:01:28A Washington Treaty that forced every capital ship to be rebuiltQ&A
  380. Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney (Long Patrol)
    3:38Nelson's all-forward armament compromiseNotable Point
  381. Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney (Long Patrol)
    33:12Four older battleships for two Nelson-class shipsNotable Point
  382. Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney (Long Patrol)
    40:10Scarcity confined the Nelson class to home watersNotable Point
  383. Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney (Long Patrol)
    42:56Commanders could stretch a battleship's performanceNotable Point
  384. Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney
    42:30Q&A: what might a third Nelson have been called?Q&A
  385. Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney
    2:46:17Why Nelson and Rodney carried all main guns forwardChapter
  386. Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney
    2:51:41Q&A: would a Nelson-type Royal Oak have survived?Q&A
  387. Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney
    2:52:34Q&A: could Nelson fire all nine guns ahead?Q&A
  388. Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney
    2:57:48Nelson as a scarce heavy striking forceChapter
  389. Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney
    3:10:35Q&A: could Nelson trade secondary guns for speed?Q&A
  390. Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney
    3:17:05Rodney's commanders, machinery, and availabilityChapter
  391. Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney
    3:37:22Q&A: why choose 16-inch guns despite logistics?Q&A
  392. Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney
    3:49:19The heavier 16-inch shell option and flawed trialsNotable Point
  393. Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney
    3:55:30The strategic risk of only two sistersChapter
  394. Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney
    4:01:51Beatty, Jutland, and Nelson's protection prioritiesNotable Point
  395. Bruships 69: The Decider
    35:36Why Lion would not simply reuse Nelson’s turretsQ&A
  396. Patreon 43: "Unverified stories of Norwegian Campaign: Tall Tales of Tribals"
    2:41:59Nelson-class design and the Royal Navy's distributed fleet doctrineQ&A
  397. Patreon 42: "Recovering from Disaster: The Imperial Russian Navy between Russo-Japanese War & WW1."
    1:21Q&A: Were Britain's 24.5-inch torpedoes useless?Q&A
  398. Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru
    38:21How the Nelson class handled rough seasQ&A
  399. Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru
    1:35:29The unsettled order of Britain's late-1930s capital-ship refitsQ&A
  400. M29 Class (M33 special, Ep2/2) - Naval Fire Support of the WWI Western Front: Long Patrol Part 9
    1:01:50From monitor layout to the Nelson classNotable Point
  401. Patreon 41: RN Strategic & Tactical thinking on submarines & anti-submarine forces between the Wars
    2:48:10Why the Nelson class was not a fast battleshipQ&A
  402. Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...
    1:26:36Why a pre-Washington bonus ship would not be a third NelsonQ&A
  403. Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...
    1:30:37Why a faster Nelson was possible but not necessarily quicker to buildQ&A
  404. Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...
    3:37:00Why interwar British battleships did not simply copy RenownQ&A
  405. How was British Night Fighting Doctrine developed for and then practiced during WWII? (Long Patrol)
    56:08Nelson and Rodney in the night-fighting conceptNotable Point
  406. Patreon 40: How was British Night Fighting Doctrine developed for and then practiced during WWII
    1:54:26Nelson and Rodney as close-range night-fighting shipsChapter
  407. Patreon 39:What if Courageous and Glorious had survived?
    2:19:03Which Axis battleships could challenge Nelson and Rodney?Q&A
  408. Inspiration of Theorists: The Maritime & Strategic Lessons of the Seven Years War (1756-63)
    2:09:32Q&A: four Admiral-class battlecruisers reshape later namesQ&A
  409. Inspiration of Theorists: The Maritime & Strategic Lessons of the Seven Years War (1756-63)
    2:26:02Q&A: where four Admiral-class ships might serveQ&A
  410. The Operation: Taranto Long Patrol p4
    16:10How crippling Italy's battle fleet could release British shipsNotable Point
  411. Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat
    1:03:39Turning Nelson into a faster economical battleshipQ&A
  412. Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat
    1:11:56Why Nelson and Rodney suffer from unfair comparisonsQ&A
  413. Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat
    5:01:21Admiral-class carrier names reshape later battleship namesNotable Point
  414. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)
    4:48Why capital ships separated guns and machineryQ&A
  415. Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…
    32:37Which battleships might survive a Fritz X hit?Q&A
  416. Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…
    2:46:02Nelson class and the missed chance for speedChapter
  417. Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…
    2:52:05How a faster Nelson might trap GneisenauNotable Point
  418. Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…
    3:00:47Was Nelson's all-forward gun arrangement worth it?Q&A
  419. Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...
    37:01Italian speed could have changed Nelson's designNotable Point
  420. Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...
    1:50:37Nelson and Rodney lead the 1920s 16-inch comparisonQ&A
  421. Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...
    2:01:18Why fixing the G3 turret layout is difficultQ&A
  422. Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)
    1:46:49The Nelson class in the treaty-era gapNotable Point
  423. Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)
    2:14:22A faster Nelson class could have changed the Bismarck huntNotable Point
  424. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (6)
    2:27:52Why Britain developed the Nelsons' 24.5-inch torpedoesQ&A
  425. Shipbuilding through the 1880s-1950s
    2:10:00Nelson's compact layout and its operational costChapter
  426. Shipbuilding through the 1880s-1950s
    2:17:37Why Nelson did not stack all three turretsQ&A
  427. Shipbuilding through the 1880s-1950s
    2:29:13Where Nelson and Rodney fit in the battle fleetQ&A
  428. Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 7/11 The Roaring Twenties
    0:40Treaty limits and the Nelson-class choiceChapter
  429. Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 7/11 The Roaring Twenties
    6:38Jutland's political shadow over battlecruisersNotable Point
  430. Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 7/11 The Roaring Twenties
    11:33Nelson's all-forward turret layoutNotable Point
  431. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (5)
    1:12:56If every treaty navy received two replacement battleshipsQ&A
  432. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (4)
    2:06:00The Nelson class's three forward turretsQ&A
  433. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (4)
    3:24:41F3 battleships and a standardized 15-inch fleetQ&A
  434. Churchill's Iniatives (WWII); Long patrol p2/3 - Force Z
    4:34Pound's Ceylon plan for the Far EastChapter
  435. Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions
    22:44Modernizing the Nelson class meant choosing prioritiesQ&A
  436. Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions
    26:28A faster Nelson could have changed the Denmark Strait forceQ&A
  437. Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions
    1:43:11The logistical case for a British 15-inch/45 gunQ&A
  438. Bruships 49 Special: 'Questions on ‘Battle Cruisers’ & ‘Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14)
    29:40Treaty rule-bending and water-based armourQ&A
  439. Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 1915
    24:53Nelson, Rodney, and the value of all-round fireNotable Point
  440. Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 1910
    16:23All-forward batteries can optimize the wrong problemNotable Point
  441. Patreon 19: 2nd Tier powers Dreadnoughts: Spain, Austria-Hungary, S.America, Greece & Ottomans
    3:20:43Designing an Irish coastal-defense battleshipQ&A
  442. Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects
    1:57:56Could Nelson have become a fast six-gun battlecruiser?Q&A
  443. Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects
    3:06:40If Hood's sisters had survived, what becomes of Nelson?Q&A
  444. Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response
    6:34Treaty tonnage rules and Britain's need for hull numbersNotable Point
  445. Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response
    12:22Nelson displacement and the N3 speed estimateQ&A
  446. Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response
    32:15All-forward main guns versus the G3 and N3 Q turretQ&A
  447. Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response
    41:15G3 design lessons and carrier-conversion potentialNotable Point
  448. Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes
    20:55The gun work behind the N3 and Nelson designsQ&A
  449. Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes
    49:45Citadel layout concentrated guns, magazines, and armorChapter
  450. Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes
    56:51The tactical cost of an all-forward main batteryChapter
  451. Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes
    58:43Later British designs moved away from Nelson's all-forward batteryQ&A
  452. Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes
    1:06:00Nelson-class machinery, weapons, and armorChapter
  453. Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes
    1:08:31Nelson's claimed speed versus likely service performanceQ&A
  454. Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes
    1:09:53Why balanced firing arcs mattered in the MediterraneanNotable Point
  455. Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes
    1:14:08Concentrated firepower also concentrated riskNotable Point
  456. Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes
    1:16:04Nelson-class freeboard and North Atlantic seakeepingQ&A
  457. Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes
    1:23:24Main-battery blast disrupted Nelson's flag facilitiesNotable Point
  458. Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes
    2:41:29The N3's likely Second World War valueQ&A
  459. Bruships 31: Some more Science Fiction from a Naval Historians Perspective...
    3:35:22An extra battlecruiser in the hunt for Scharnhorst and GneisenauQ&A
  460. Bruships 31: Some more Science Fiction from a Naval Historians Perspective...
    3:39:40Cruisers and destroyers supporting the Revenge counterfactualNotable Point
  461. Bruships30: Nine Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects(Including 1939) & Three New Books
    1:53:53Nelson and Rodney under Washington Treaty limitsChapter
  462. Bruships30: Nine Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects(Including 1939) & Three New Books
    1:57:41D'Eyncourt's role on both sides of Nelson's construction contractNotable Point
  463. Steel of a Hundred Years Ago: Ships of 1920
    2:45:16Trading Nelson's torpedoes for power and layoutQ&A
  464. Bruships 25 - Some More Naval Aviation
    1:13:20Could Yamato intelligence have given King George V 16-inch guns?Q&A
  465. 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 5 of 5/Articles 17-22
    37:20King George V gun and turret compromisesNotable Point
  466. Patreon Video 4: Tsingtao 1939 Goes Hot...
    2:17:46Eight British capital ships for the Pacific fleetNotable Point
  467. Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5a Introduction to Patreon Video 4
    42:40The remaining Mediterranean capital shipsNotable Point
  468. Bru Ships Episode 11: Top Trumps/Ship Comparison Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A
    34:13How Jackie Fisher might have reworked the Nelson classQ&A
  469. Introuduction to Refits/Taking Care of Buisness Allied Style
    24:27Portsmouth can still repair Nelson early in the warNotable Point
  470. Introuduction to Refits/Taking Care of Buisness Allied Style
    25:03Nelson moves from emergency bow repair to American overhaulNotable Point
  471. Introuduction to Refits/Taking Care of Buisness Allied Style
    26:48Nelson and Rodney show how sister ships can age differentlyNotable Point
  472. Introuduction to Refits/Taking Care of Buisness Allied Style
    27:14Rodney's crew holds a defective battleship togetherNotable Point
  473. Introuduction to Refits/Taking Care of Buisness Allied Style
    28:12Rodney loses modernization resources to higher prioritiesNotable Point
  474. Top 10 Ships – not Tribal, Battle, Daring or Town classes…
    14:50Why Nelson and Rodney fall short of the top tenQ&A
  475. Exercises & War Gaming Rules in 1929
    20:29Warhead size and hit location determined torpedo consequencesNotable Point