Video

Bruships 25 - Some More Naval Aviation

Study Bruships 25 - Some More Naval Aviation, a Dr. Alex Clarke video from 8 Nov 2020, with 92 time notes. Topics include Aircraft Carriers, Fleet Air Arm, Live Q&A.

Date
Runtime4:20:26
Guide points92 time notes

Time notes

  1. 7:01
    QuestionWhich fighter, dive bomber, torpedo bomber, and scout would make the best 1939 naval force?Answer

    The preferred choices are the Swordfish as torpedo bomber, Skua as dive bomber, Catalina as scout, and Japan's A5M as fighter, with availability in 1939 governing the selection.

    Q&A
  2. 11:31
    QuestionWhich Second World War piston fighter achieved the most victories over jet aircraft?Answer

    The ranking remains unsettled after considering Corsair, Typhoon or Tempest, Spitfire, and Mustang claims from wartime and Korean War combat.

    Q&A
  3. 13:33
    QuestionCould a Pearl Harbor-style carrier strike have been delivered in 1939?Answer

    No. Aircraft numbers and the rapid development of American and Japanese naval aviation during the following eighteen months to two years changed what was possible.

    Q&A
  4. 14:49
    How a Greek naval project led toward the Swordfish

    The Swordfish's lineage runs from a Greek naval requirement through Fairey's private-venture TSR1 and hazardous flight testing.

    Chapter
  5. 21:49
    QuestionWhat made the eighteen months before 1941 so important for naval aviation?Answer

    More powerful engines helped, while sustained redesign and testing transformed types such as the Wildcat and prepared the way for the Hellcat.

    Q&A
  6. 22:51
    QuestionWould the Dutch Navy in 1940 have been better off with Tribal-class destroyers instead of the Gerard Callenburgh class?Answer

    Possibly, but the Dutch were a small navy trying to obtain as much capability as their economy could support, and the Gerard Callenburgh design served that need well.

    Q&A
  7. 24:03
    QuestionDo people underestimate the technical advances in naval aircraft between 1935 and 1945?Answer

    Yes, especially when they mistake speed for the whole of progress and ignore reliability, payload, endurance, carrier fit, and doctrine.

    Q&A
  8. 26:17
    Carrier engineering depends on fleet requirements

    Catapults offer broad aircraft compatibility, while the case for the Queen Elizabeth class depends on Britain's fleet size and requirements.

    Notable Point
  9. 28:15
    Why the Albacore did not automatically improve on the Swordfish

    An enclosed cockpit and newer design did not guarantee a better night-attack aircraft when the replacement failed to preserve the Swordfish's practical advantages.

    Notable Point
  10. 29:09
    Could Admiral-class hulls have become carriers?

    A counterfactual considers converting more Admiral-class battlecruisers into large carriers able to support twin-engine aircraft.

    Chapter
  11. 31:41
    QuestionWould an air group of F3Fs, Swordfish, and Hs 123s be a good choice for 1939?Answer

    The Skua is still preferred over the Hs 123, chiefly because of carrier landings.

    Q&A
  12. 32:48
    QuestionWould the Royal Navy fill the proposed Admiral-class carriers with smaller spare aircraft, parts, and workshops?Answer

    To an extent, but the hulls would retain substantial hangar space for long-range, reliable twin-engine aircraft.

    Q&A
  13. 37:00
    The naval aviation cost of 1918

    RAF control left Fleet Air Arm requirements competing with an institutional preference for heavy bombers.

    Chapter
  14. 40:30
    QuestionCould Prince of Wales and Hood have been joined by an Admiral-class carrier at the Denmark Strait?Answer

    Potentially. The extra carrier could join that force, and its importance would make a substantial escort much more likely.

    Q&A
  15. 42:09
    QuestionWas RAF Coastal Command controlled by the Royal Air Force or the Royal Navy?Answer

    It was an RAF command that cooperated closely with the Royal Navy on maritime operations.

    Q&A
  16. 43:12
    QuestionDid the U.S. Navy make a mistake by choosing the Super Hornet rather than an updated Tomcat?Answer

    The F-14 had great potential, but the Super Hornet was substantially cheaper and simpler to maintain within a constrained air group.

    Q&A
  17. 46:12
    Fleet exercises can reinforce mistaken assumptions

    Interwar exercises could reinforce pre-war assumptions by producing misleading indications of success.

    Notable Point
  18. 46:43
    Wake Island's improvised Marine air defence

    Wake Island's Wildcat detachment fought with unfamiliar aircraft, a cramped runway, hand fueling, no radar, and too little of almost everything.

    Chapter
  19. 52:20
    QuestionHow reliable is the Operation Downfall study Hell to Pay?Answer

    It is a worthwhile study, but its casualty estimates may be too high because they give too little weight to Allied firepower. An invasion would still have caused far heavier losses on both sides.

    Q&A
  20. 1:00:49
    Fuel safety and manpower delayed escort-carrier service

    British escort-carrier commissioning combined handover delays, safety modifications, crew preparation, and personnel shortages.

    Chapter
  21. 1:03:13
    Escort carriers put aircraft with the convoy

    Escort carriers made anti-submarine air power responsive because their aircraft began the patrol beside the protected convoy.

    Chapter
  22. 1:05:21
    Trade-protection and assault escort carriers

    British escort carriers split into trade-protection and assault groups because convoy defence and amphibious air support required different command spaces and sensors.

    Notable Point
  23. 1:08:47
    QuestionCould the United States and Japan answer a single unusually powerful British battleship by building one counter each?Answer

    One counter would be unreliable because the original ship's navy could choose when to use it. Several matching ships or an agreed limit would address the problem more consistently.

    Q&A
  24. 1:09:22
    QuestionWould the Royal Navy have believed plans showing that Japan was building Yamato?Answer

    Yes. Earlier knowledge of Yamato's armament might also have prevented the suspension of some British capital-ship construction in 1939.

    Q&A
  25. 1:13:20
    QuestionWould Britain have built King George V with three triple 16-inch turrets if it had known about Yamato?Answer

    Probably, if that knowledge made the 14-inch treaty limit untenable. Nelson-class turret designs could have provided a starting point.

    Q&A
  26. 1:14:45
    809 Naval Air Squadron develops the Buccaneer force

    The history of 809 Naval Air Squadron links Buccaneer S1 development and crew training to the S2's operational career aboard Hermes and Ark Royal.

    Chapter
  27. 1:22:21
    QuestionWhat sources support the claim that Americans were impressed by the Buccaneer?Answer

    A Rowland White book is suggested, but its title and relevant passage are not verified.

    Q&A
  28. 1:26:37
    QuestionHow early were escort carriers being considered?Answer

    British planners had worked on merchant-carrier conversions during the 1930s, with HMS Argus helping to test the ideas.

    Q&A
  29. 1:29:59
    QuestionCould a Buccaneer drop a delayed-action bomb to explode near a pursuing aircraft?Answer

    Several defensive tricks are recalled from Michael Clapp's accounts, but this specific technique is not explained or verified.

    Q&A
  30. 1:30:16
    QuestionHow did Buccaneer anti-ship doctrine compare with U.S. carrier strike before Harpoon?Answer

    The doctrines were broadly similar, but Vietnam focused American carrier aviation elsewhere. Buccaneers combined very low approaches with electronic countermeasures for anti-ship and land attack.

    Q&A
  31. 1:32:33
    Why an escort carrier is not a small fleet carrier

    Escort-carrier design depends on the patrol, alert, endurance, and support tasks it must actually sustain.

    Notable Point
  32. 1:37:28
    Why earlier escort carriers would not automatically end the war

    Saving more merchant ships in 1942 would have helped greatly, but it does not by itself move the invasion timetable or prove the war ends a year earlier.

    Notable Point
  33. 1:42:42
    Escort-carrier radar needed weight and control-room capacity

    Radar capability aboard an escort carrier depended on topweight limits and the space available to control aircraft.

    Notable Point
  34. 1:43:04
    Carrier conversions competed with repairs and available aircraft

    Earlier escort carriers would have required dockyard capacity diverted from repairs and aircraft suitable for their decks.

    Notable Point
  35. 1:44:20
    Britain's strategy of clearing the wider maritime war first

    British strategy repeatedly sought to remove enemy positions around the world before concentrating power against the European center.

    Notable Point
  36. 1:45:30
    QuestionHas VSTOL technology made escort-carrier conversion easier?Answer

    It helps, but modern merchant ships still require substantial work and suitable hulls are less plentiful.

    Q&A
  37. 1:46:31
    QuestionHow did British shipbuilding capacity in 1939 compare with 1929?Answer

    It was expanding and improved during the war, but Britain fought before its planned 1942 buildup was complete and lacked America's extra mobilization time.

    Q&A
  38. 1:49:13
    The move toward single-seat carrier strike aircraft

    Late-war navigation aids and air superiority changed the U.S. Navy's assumptions about crews, defensive guns, and strike aircraft.

    Chapter
  39. 1:50:14
    How the Douglas BTD became a single-seat bomber

    Removing the gunner and turrets gave the BTD more fuel and armour, but adapting a two-seat design left it disadvantaged against purpose-built competitors.

    Notable Point
  40. 1:53:54
    The Skypirate's heavy payload lost out to single-seat doctrine

    The Skypirate offered a large payload and strong performance, but the Navy's move away from multi-crew bombers ended its development.

    Notable Point
  41. 1:55:58
    QuestionWas Britain's threat to invade Norway a strategic success despite no invasion taking place?Answer

    It helped keep roughly 300,000 German troops away from other fronts. Protecting U-boat facilities offered a competing reason for the garrison, but its size is still challenged.

    Q&A
  42. 1:57:50
    QuestionWhy do smaller navies not plan civilian ships for conversion, given VSTOL aircraft and modular systems?Answer

    They tend to consider civilian conversions only when a major war creates an urgent need.

    Q&A
  43. 1:58:16
    Why North Africa mattered to Britain's Far Eastern supply line

    Removing Axis control from North Africa helped reopen the shorter Mediterranean route that connected Britain's European war with its commitments in the Far East.

    Notable Point
  44. 1:58:36
    QuestionWhat aircraft might Aquila have operated, and could Italy manage without German aircraft?Answer

    Navalized Italian aircraft were under consideration, but no settled air group or firm answer about dependence on Germany is given.

    Q&A
  45. 2:02:28
    Why level bombing magnified small aiming errors

    A practical explanation shows why level bombing magnified small errors in release timing, wind, altitude, and aircraft attitude.

    Notable Point
  46. 2:05:41
    QuestionWas the helicopter cruiser HMS Tiger really too far gone to reactivate for the Falklands in 1982?Answer

    Yes. Reserve status did not make her fit for reactivation.

    Q&A
  47. 2:09:56
    QuestionDid Germany jam British electronic bombing aids as Britain jammed German guidance systems?Answer

    Yes, with mixed success. British intelligence helped counter the attempts, and ordinary equipment failures could be mistaken for interference.

    Q&A
  48. 2:10:23
    QuestionWas HMS Hermes already in the scrapyard in 1982?Answer

    No. She was still in use and remained a major fleet unit.

    Q&A
  49. 2:11:03
    QuestionWhat was the Gannet and why would it have mattered in the Falklands?Answer

    It was first a carrier anti-submarine aircraft and later an AEW platform; an airborne warning asset could have improved fighter direction in 1982.

    Q&A
  50. 2:15:13
    QuestionDid Margaret Thatcher respond to the Falklands invasion by saying 'send the Buccaneers'?Answer

    No supporting evidence is identified. The competing account has Thatcher initially doubting Britain's ability to intervene.

    Q&A
  51. 2:18:10
    Invincible mobilizes for the Falklands

    The Falklands deployment required hurried loading, flagship choices, last-minute air-group preparation, and an unprecedented propulsion repair at sea.

    Chapter
  52. 2:27:57
    QuestionHow much design commonality existed between Royal Navy and U.S. Navy steam catapults?Answer

    More than their separate origins suggest, but too little for convenient spare-parts compatibility.

    Q&A
  53. 2:30:08
    QuestionWhat purpose did the proposed 'Alaskan Highway' beside CV-01's superstructure serve?Answer

    It created a route and working area for moving aircraft between landing, lift, storage, and launch positions.

    Q&A
  54. 2:33:53
    QuestionWhy are armed forces interested in greener energy and transport technology?Answer

    Efficiency and local generation reduce fuel logistics, provided the equipment does not introduce unacceptable battlefield vulnerabilities.

    Q&A
  55. 2:36:04
    A Swordfish attack run at Taranto

    A damaged Swordfish survives a balloon-cable strike and torpedo attack, then returns to Illustrious using improvised control and cross-checked navigation.

    Chapter
  56. 2:49:57
    QuestionWould the Spiteful or Seafang have been better than the Sea Fury for naval operations?Answer

    Better paper performance did not outweigh the Sea Fury's maintenance, damage-tolerance, and availability advantages within a carrier's limited air group.

    Q&A
  57. 2:52:16
    QuestionWere much higher aircraft losses expected at Taranto?Answer

    Yes. Estimates of fifty percent or higher are mentioned, compared with only two aircraft actually lost.

    Q&A
  58. 2:55:38
    An aircraft has to be available to fight

    Carrier aviation rewards reliable aircraft that can generate sorties, even when another design looks better in a specification table.

    Notable Point
  59. 3:05:32
    Flare droppers and a battleship hit at Taranto

    Flare aircraft illuminate Taranto and bomb fuel storage while Williamson's crew torpedoes Conte di Cavour and escapes from a Swordfish lost in the harbour.

    Chapter
  60. 3:11:27
    Why removing the crew need not shrink an aircraft

    An uncrewed aircraft can use the space saved by removing people to carry additional fuel or weapons.

    Notable Point
  61. 3:12:11
    QuestionWhy were no bombs used at Taranto?Answer

    Bombs were used. They damaged cruisers and destroyers and attacked fuel dumps and the seaplane facilities whose aircraft could have searched for the British force.

    Q&A
  62. 3:14:43
    Caspar John on what an aircraft carrier contains

    Caspar John's 1953 carrier analogy combines an air station, air defences, power, communications, and accommodation inside a self-propelled ship.

    Chapter
  63. 3:20:20
    Training crews and synchronizing a carrier air group

    Selective recruitment, lengthy flying training, and coordinated squadron and ship schedules were necessary to put an operational carrier air group to sea.

    Notable Point
  64. 3:26:02
    QuestionWhat function did the Fleet Air Arm airfields in Pembrokeshire serve?Answer

    Probably anti-submarine-warfare squadrons, although no particular station or period is identified.

    Q&A
  65. 3:27:28
    When two British firms competed to build one naval aircraft

    The Gannet competition illustrates a 1950s industrial base large enough for Fairey and Blackburn to develop rival naval aircraft for the same requirement.

    Notable Point
  66. 3:30:30
    QuestionHow did Britain decline from a top-tier military power?Answer

    Low political priority and funding current wars by cutting other capabilities have left the services badly balanced.

    Q&A
  67. 3:33:56
    How a fast fighter could overshoot a Swordfish

    A hypothetical Bf 109 attack shows how excessive closing speed could expose a fast fighter to a slow Swordfish's gun.

    Notable Point
  68. 3:36:29
    QuestionShould a carrier version of the P-8 exist?Answer

    The P-8 would need a very large carrier, while a smaller fixed-wing carrier ASW aircraft could provide valuable coverage if the submarine threat grows.

    Q&A
  69. 3:37:25
    QuestionDid Bf 109s shoot down Swordfish during the Channel Dash?Answer

    Yes. The Swordfish were attacking with torpedoes under very heavy fighter cover and lacked fighter protection of their own.

    Q&A
  70. 3:38:29
    QuestionWould you have chosen the Boeing X-32 in the Joint Strike Fighter competition?Answer

    The X-32 offered possible production and reliability advantages, while the F-35's overall qualities made its selection understandable.

    Q&A
  71. 3:41:28
    QuestionWill Britain develop an Osprey-based airborne early warning aircraft?Answer

    That was considered unlikely in 2020, while Merlin-based Crowsnest offered a practical option for Britain and other F-35B carrier operators.

    Q&A
  72. 3:42:24
    QuestionWould renewed fixed-wing carrier ASW require a purpose-built aircraft?Answer

    An upgraded stored S-3 Viking was a possible alternative if enough usable flight hours remained.

    Q&A
  73. 3:42:39
    A naval V-280 proposal and the Merlin replacement timetable

    Merlin's replacement programme offered a possible route for a naval aircraft with more reach than a conventional helicopter.

    Notable Point
  74. 3:45:15
    QuestionWhat aircraft might the Italian carrier offered in Victory at Sea have operated?Answer

    Several navalized Italian fighters were possible, but the intended air group never became a settled, operational plan.

    Q&A
  75. 3:49:01
    QuestionWhich aircraft or ships would be worth reactivating from reserve in a national emergency?Answer

    Prioritize viable patrol and stand-off platforms rather than obsolete high-performance fighters.

    Q&A
  76. 3:51:52
    QuestionWas Merlin expected to serve for about thirty-five years before replacement?Answer

    It had already served for twenty-one years in 2020, so replacement planning needed to begin soon.

    Q&A
  77. 3:55:57
    QuestionWhat sort of aircraft could replace Merlin?Answer

    A later-generation vertical-takeoff aircraft, possibly beyond the Osprey's immediate successors.

    Q&A
  78. 3:56:39
    QuestionHow would a submarine use a surface-to-air missile?Answer

    As a last-ditch weapon against a nearby ASW helicopter, followed immediately by an attempt to dive and escape.

    Q&A
  79. 3:57:34
    QuestionCould an upgraded F-14 carry ten or more AMRAAMs because it could carry six Phoenix missiles?Answer

    Possibly, but the hardpoints would probably need modification, and both missile weight and mounting arrangements would matter.

    Q&A
  80. 3:57:58
    QuestionWhat separates an arsenal ship from a modern warship carrying many missiles?Answer

    A warship can sense, decide, and employ its weapons independently, while an arsenal ship is primarily a magazine for a wider network.

    Q&A
  81. 4:00:29
    QuestionHow did NATO answer the Alfa class submarine's very high speed?Answer

    Britain developed the much faster Spearfish torpedo, while the Alfa's own sensors became far less useful at top speed.

    Q&A
  82. 4:03:22
    QuestionWould Japan buy access to the Queen Elizabeth-class carrier design?Answer

    That seemed unlikely because Japan preferred its own designs and might want a newer starting point by the time it moved to carriers of that size.

    Q&A
  83. 4:03:53
    The 2020 case for replacing Albion and Bulwark with LHDs

    A 2020 proposal uses three LHDs to preserve amphibious lift while adding aviation and air-defence flexibility.

    Notable Point
  84. 4:05:38
    QuestionWill the RAF or Royal Navy acquire another long-range maritime surveillance aircraft or bomber, given the cost and flexibility of aircraft compared with ships?Answer

    The RAF had already bought the P-8, and both shore-based patrol aircraft and carriers remain necessary for different tasks.

    Q&A
  85. 4:07:30
    QuestionWould future Royal Navy amphibious ships be home-built or use a foreign design?Answer

    British construction was expected, while Type 31 showed that a foreign-derived design could still offer the better starting point.

    Q&A
  86. 4:09:37
    QuestionWould Project Tempest and Japan's stealth-fighter effort work together?Answer

    The 2020 expectation was close cooperation and information sharing, with possible later U.S. participation, while Britain and Japan protected industrial work shares.

    Q&A
  87. 4:10:59
    QuestionWhy is the 2019 film Midway criticized even though it follows the battle's broad story?Answer

    Because broad plot fidelity does not fix omitted participants, inconsistent ship depictions, and other operational distortions.

    Q&A
  88. 4:12:14
    QuestionWho would buy Prince of Wales after possible post-COVID defence cuts, and which British service was most exposed?Answer

    A sale was considered unlikely, while the Army appeared more vulnerable because several programmes were exposed to cancellation.

    Q&A
  89. 4:14:01
    QuestionCould Prince of Wales help replace Bonhomme Richard with a Royal Navy crew and U.S. Marine Corps air group?Answer

    A broader arrangement for British carrier support in the Pacific was considered plausible, though no agreement was confirmed.

    Q&A
  90. 4:14:36
    QuestionWould a speculative battlecruiser or guided-missile destroyer design be more likely to receive consideration in Whitehall?Answer

    The destroyer, because a battlecruiser label was expected to invite funding cuts.

    Q&A
  91. 4:14:59
    QuestionWhat should be made of the warning that the recession after COVID could lead to World War III?Answer

    It raised a reasonable concern and appeared intended to strengthen the case against defence cuts.

    Q&A
  92. 4:17:24
    QuestionHow could NATO counter the Soviet Mike submarine operating below 1,000 metres?Answer

    Possible approaches were depth charges capable of reaching it or catching it in shallower water before it could dive deeply.

    Q&A