Video
Bruships 25 - Some More Naval Aviation
Study Bruships 25 - Some More Naval Aviation, a Dr. Alex Clarke video from 8 Nov 2020, with 92 time notes. Topics include Aircraft Carriers, Fleet Air Arm, Live Q&A.
Time notes
- 7:01QuestionWhich fighter, dive bomber, torpedo bomber, and scout would make the best 1939 naval force?AnswerQ&A
The preferred choices are the Swordfish as torpedo bomber, Skua as dive bomber, Catalina as scout, and Japan's A5M as fighter, with availability in 1939 governing the selection.
- 11:31QuestionWhich Second World War piston fighter achieved the most victories over jet aircraft?AnswerQ&A
The ranking remains unsettled after considering Corsair, Typhoon or Tempest, Spitfire, and Mustang claims from wartime and Korean War combat.
- 13:33QuestionCould a Pearl Harbor-style carrier strike have been delivered in 1939?AnswerQ&A
No. Aircraft numbers and the rapid development of American and Japanese naval aviation during the following eighteen months to two years changed what was possible.
- 14:49How a Greek naval project led toward the SwordfishChapter
The Swordfish's lineage runs from a Greek naval requirement through Fairey's private-venture TSR1 and hazardous flight testing.
- 21:49QuestionWhat made the eighteen months before 1941 so important for naval aviation?AnswerQ&A
More powerful engines helped, while sustained redesign and testing transformed types such as the Wildcat and prepared the way for the Hellcat.
- 22:51QuestionWould the Dutch Navy in 1940 have been better off with Tribal-class destroyers instead of the Gerard Callenburgh class?AnswerQ&A
Possibly, but the Dutch were a small navy trying to obtain as much capability as their economy could support, and the Gerard Callenburgh design served that need well.
- 24:03QuestionDo people underestimate the technical advances in naval aircraft between 1935 and 1945?AnswerQ&A
Yes, especially when they mistake speed for the whole of progress and ignore reliability, payload, endurance, carrier fit, and doctrine.
- 26:17Carrier engineering depends on fleet requirementsNotable Point
Catapults offer broad aircraft compatibility, while the case for the Queen Elizabeth class depends on Britain's fleet size and requirements.
- 28:15Why the Albacore did not automatically improve on the SwordfishNotable Point
An enclosed cockpit and newer design did not guarantee a better night-attack aircraft when the replacement failed to preserve the Swordfish's practical advantages.
- 29:09Could Admiral-class hulls have become carriers?Chapter
A counterfactual considers converting more Admiral-class battlecruisers into large carriers able to support twin-engine aircraft.
- 31:41QuestionWould an air group of F3Fs, Swordfish, and Hs 123s be a good choice for 1939?AnswerQ&A
The Skua is still preferred over the Hs 123, chiefly because of carrier landings.
- 32:48QuestionWould the Royal Navy fill the proposed Admiral-class carriers with smaller spare aircraft, parts, and workshops?AnswerQ&A
To an extent, but the hulls would retain substantial hangar space for long-range, reliable twin-engine aircraft.
- 37:00The naval aviation cost of 1918Chapter
RAF control left Fleet Air Arm requirements competing with an institutional preference for heavy bombers.
- 40:30QuestionCould Prince of Wales and Hood have been joined by an Admiral-class carrier at the Denmark Strait?AnswerQ&A
Potentially. The extra carrier could join that force, and its importance would make a substantial escort much more likely.
- 42:09QuestionWas RAF Coastal Command controlled by the Royal Air Force or the Royal Navy?AnswerQ&A
It was an RAF command that cooperated closely with the Royal Navy on maritime operations.
- 43:12QuestionDid the U.S. Navy make a mistake by choosing the Super Hornet rather than an updated Tomcat?AnswerQ&A
The F-14 had great potential, but the Super Hornet was substantially cheaper and simpler to maintain within a constrained air group.
- 46:12Fleet exercises can reinforce mistaken assumptionsNotable Point
Interwar exercises could reinforce pre-war assumptions by producing misleading indications of success.
- 46:43Wake Island's improvised Marine air defenceChapter
Wake Island's Wildcat detachment fought with unfamiliar aircraft, a cramped runway, hand fueling, no radar, and too little of almost everything.
- 52:20QuestionHow reliable is the Operation Downfall study Hell to Pay?AnswerQ&A
It is a worthwhile study, but its casualty estimates may be too high because they give too little weight to Allied firepower. An invasion would still have caused far heavier losses on both sides.
- 1:00:49Fuel safety and manpower delayed escort-carrier serviceChapter
British escort-carrier commissioning combined handover delays, safety modifications, crew preparation, and personnel shortages.
- 1:03:13Escort carriers put aircraft with the convoyChapter
Escort carriers made anti-submarine air power responsive because their aircraft began the patrol beside the protected convoy.
- 1:05:21Trade-protection and assault escort carriersNotable Point
British escort carriers split into trade-protection and assault groups because convoy defence and amphibious air support required different command spaces and sensors.
- 1:08:47QuestionCould the United States and Japan answer a single unusually powerful British battleship by building one counter each?AnswerQ&A
One counter would be unreliable because the original ship's navy could choose when to use it. Several matching ships or an agreed limit would address the problem more consistently.
- 1:09:22QuestionWould the Royal Navy have believed plans showing that Japan was building Yamato?AnswerQ&A
Yes. Earlier knowledge of Yamato's armament might also have prevented the suspension of some British capital-ship construction in 1939.
- 1:13:20QuestionWould Britain have built King George V with three triple 16-inch turrets if it had known about Yamato?AnswerQ&A
Probably, if that knowledge made the 14-inch treaty limit untenable. Nelson-class turret designs could have provided a starting point.
- 1:14:45809 Naval Air Squadron develops the Buccaneer forceChapter
The history of 809 Naval Air Squadron links Buccaneer S1 development and crew training to the S2's operational career aboard Hermes and Ark Royal.
- 1:22:21QuestionWhat sources support the claim that Americans were impressed by the Buccaneer?AnswerQ&A
A Rowland White book is suggested, but its title and relevant passage are not verified.
- 1:26:37QuestionHow early were escort carriers being considered?AnswerQ&A
British planners had worked on merchant-carrier conversions during the 1930s, with HMS Argus helping to test the ideas.
- 1:29:59QuestionCould a Buccaneer drop a delayed-action bomb to explode near a pursuing aircraft?AnswerQ&A
Several defensive tricks are recalled from Michael Clapp's accounts, but this specific technique is not explained or verified.
- 1:30:16QuestionHow did Buccaneer anti-ship doctrine compare with U.S. carrier strike before Harpoon?AnswerQ&A
The doctrines were broadly similar, but Vietnam focused American carrier aviation elsewhere. Buccaneers combined very low approaches with electronic countermeasures for anti-ship and land attack.
- 1:32:33Why an escort carrier is not a small fleet carrierNotable Point
Escort-carrier design depends on the patrol, alert, endurance, and support tasks it must actually sustain.
- 1:37:28Why earlier escort carriers would not automatically end the warNotable Point
Saving more merchant ships in 1942 would have helped greatly, but it does not by itself move the invasion timetable or prove the war ends a year earlier.
- 1:42:42Escort-carrier radar needed weight and control-room capacityNotable Point
Radar capability aboard an escort carrier depended on topweight limits and the space available to control aircraft.
- 1:43:04Carrier conversions competed with repairs and available aircraftNotable Point
Earlier escort carriers would have required dockyard capacity diverted from repairs and aircraft suitable for their decks.
- 1:44:20Britain's strategy of clearing the wider maritime war firstNotable Point
British strategy repeatedly sought to remove enemy positions around the world before concentrating power against the European center.
- 1:45:30QuestionHas VSTOL technology made escort-carrier conversion easier?AnswerQ&A
It helps, but modern merchant ships still require substantial work and suitable hulls are less plentiful.
- 1:46:31QuestionHow did British shipbuilding capacity in 1939 compare with 1929?AnswerQ&A
It was expanding and improved during the war, but Britain fought before its planned 1942 buildup was complete and lacked America's extra mobilization time.
- 1:49:13The move toward single-seat carrier strike aircraftChapter
Late-war navigation aids and air superiority changed the U.S. Navy's assumptions about crews, defensive guns, and strike aircraft.
- 1:50:14How the Douglas BTD became a single-seat bomberNotable Point
Removing the gunner and turrets gave the BTD more fuel and armour, but adapting a two-seat design left it disadvantaged against purpose-built competitors.
- 1:53:54The Skypirate's heavy payload lost out to single-seat doctrineNotable Point
The Skypirate offered a large payload and strong performance, but the Navy's move away from multi-crew bombers ended its development.
- 1:55:58QuestionWas Britain's threat to invade Norway a strategic success despite no invasion taking place?AnswerQ&A
It helped keep roughly 300,000 German troops away from other fronts. Protecting U-boat facilities offered a competing reason for the garrison, but its size is still challenged.
- 1:57:50QuestionWhy do smaller navies not plan civilian ships for conversion, given VSTOL aircraft and modular systems?AnswerQ&A
They tend to consider civilian conversions only when a major war creates an urgent need.
- 1:58:16Why North Africa mattered to Britain's Far Eastern supply lineNotable Point
Removing Axis control from North Africa helped reopen the shorter Mediterranean route that connected Britain's European war with its commitments in the Far East.
- 1:58:36QuestionWhat aircraft might Aquila have operated, and could Italy manage without German aircraft?AnswerQ&A
Navalized Italian aircraft were under consideration, but no settled air group or firm answer about dependence on Germany is given.
- 2:02:28Why level bombing magnified small aiming errorsNotable Point
A practical explanation shows why level bombing magnified small errors in release timing, wind, altitude, and aircraft attitude.
- 2:05:41QuestionWas the helicopter cruiser HMS Tiger really too far gone to reactivate for the Falklands in 1982?AnswerQ&A
Yes. Reserve status did not make her fit for reactivation.
- 2:09:56QuestionDid Germany jam British electronic bombing aids as Britain jammed German guidance systems?AnswerQ&A
Yes, with mixed success. British intelligence helped counter the attempts, and ordinary equipment failures could be mistaken for interference.
- 2:10:23QuestionWas HMS Hermes already in the scrapyard in 1982?AnswerQ&A
No. She was still in use and remained a major fleet unit.
- 2:11:03QuestionWhat was the Gannet and why would it have mattered in the Falklands?AnswerQ&A
It was first a carrier anti-submarine aircraft and later an AEW platform; an airborne warning asset could have improved fighter direction in 1982.
- 2:15:13QuestionDid Margaret Thatcher respond to the Falklands invasion by saying 'send the Buccaneers'?AnswerQ&A
No supporting evidence is identified. The competing account has Thatcher initially doubting Britain's ability to intervene.
- 2:18:10Invincible mobilizes for the FalklandsChapter
The Falklands deployment required hurried loading, flagship choices, last-minute air-group preparation, and an unprecedented propulsion repair at sea.
- 2:27:57QuestionHow much design commonality existed between Royal Navy and U.S. Navy steam catapults?AnswerQ&A
More than their separate origins suggest, but too little for convenient spare-parts compatibility.
- 2:30:08QuestionWhat purpose did the proposed 'Alaskan Highway' beside CV-01's superstructure serve?AnswerQ&A
It created a route and working area for moving aircraft between landing, lift, storage, and launch positions.
- 2:33:53QuestionWhy are armed forces interested in greener energy and transport technology?AnswerQ&A
Efficiency and local generation reduce fuel logistics, provided the equipment does not introduce unacceptable battlefield vulnerabilities.
- 2:36:04A Swordfish attack run at TarantoChapter
A damaged Swordfish survives a balloon-cable strike and torpedo attack, then returns to Illustrious using improvised control and cross-checked navigation.
- 2:49:57QuestionWould the Spiteful or Seafang have been better than the Sea Fury for naval operations?AnswerQ&A
Better paper performance did not outweigh the Sea Fury's maintenance, damage-tolerance, and availability advantages within a carrier's limited air group.
- 2:52:16QuestionWere much higher aircraft losses expected at Taranto?AnswerQ&A
Yes. Estimates of fifty percent or higher are mentioned, compared with only two aircraft actually lost.
- 2:55:38An aircraft has to be available to fightNotable Point
Carrier aviation rewards reliable aircraft that can generate sorties, even when another design looks better in a specification table.
- 3:05:32Flare droppers and a battleship hit at TarantoChapter
Flare aircraft illuminate Taranto and bomb fuel storage while Williamson's crew torpedoes Conte di Cavour and escapes from a Swordfish lost in the harbour.
- 3:11:27Why removing the crew need not shrink an aircraftNotable Point
An uncrewed aircraft can use the space saved by removing people to carry additional fuel or weapons.
- 3:12:11QuestionWhy were no bombs used at Taranto?AnswerQ&A
Bombs were used. They damaged cruisers and destroyers and attacked fuel dumps and the seaplane facilities whose aircraft could have searched for the British force.
- 3:14:43Caspar John on what an aircraft carrier containsChapter
Caspar John's 1953 carrier analogy combines an air station, air defences, power, communications, and accommodation inside a self-propelled ship.
- 3:20:20Training crews and synchronizing a carrier air groupNotable Point
Selective recruitment, lengthy flying training, and coordinated squadron and ship schedules were necessary to put an operational carrier air group to sea.
- 3:26:02QuestionWhat function did the Fleet Air Arm airfields in Pembrokeshire serve?AnswerQ&A
Probably anti-submarine-warfare squadrons, although no particular station or period is identified.
- 3:27:28When two British firms competed to build one naval aircraftNotable Point
The Gannet competition illustrates a 1950s industrial base large enough for Fairey and Blackburn to develop rival naval aircraft for the same requirement.
- 3:30:30QuestionHow did Britain decline from a top-tier military power?AnswerQ&A
Low political priority and funding current wars by cutting other capabilities have left the services badly balanced.
- 3:33:56How a fast fighter could overshoot a SwordfishNotable Point
A hypothetical Bf 109 attack shows how excessive closing speed could expose a fast fighter to a slow Swordfish's gun.
- 3:36:29QuestionShould a carrier version of the P-8 exist?AnswerQ&A
The P-8 would need a very large carrier, while a smaller fixed-wing carrier ASW aircraft could provide valuable coverage if the submarine threat grows.
- 3:37:25QuestionDid Bf 109s shoot down Swordfish during the Channel Dash?AnswerQ&A
Yes. The Swordfish were attacking with torpedoes under very heavy fighter cover and lacked fighter protection of their own.
- 3:38:29QuestionWould you have chosen the Boeing X-32 in the Joint Strike Fighter competition?AnswerQ&A
The X-32 offered possible production and reliability advantages, while the F-35's overall qualities made its selection understandable.
- 3:41:28QuestionWill Britain develop an Osprey-based airborne early warning aircraft?AnswerQ&A
That was considered unlikely in 2020, while Merlin-based Crowsnest offered a practical option for Britain and other F-35B carrier operators.
- 3:42:24QuestionWould renewed fixed-wing carrier ASW require a purpose-built aircraft?AnswerQ&A
An upgraded stored S-3 Viking was a possible alternative if enough usable flight hours remained.
- 3:42:39A naval V-280 proposal and the Merlin replacement timetableNotable Point
Merlin's replacement programme offered a possible route for a naval aircraft with more reach than a conventional helicopter.
- 3:45:15QuestionWhat aircraft might the Italian carrier offered in Victory at Sea have operated?AnswerQ&A
Several navalized Italian fighters were possible, but the intended air group never became a settled, operational plan.
- 3:49:01QuestionWhich aircraft or ships would be worth reactivating from reserve in a national emergency?AnswerQ&A
Prioritize viable patrol and stand-off platforms rather than obsolete high-performance fighters.
- 3:51:52QuestionWas Merlin expected to serve for about thirty-five years before replacement?AnswerQ&A
It had already served for twenty-one years in 2020, so replacement planning needed to begin soon.
- 3:55:57QuestionWhat sort of aircraft could replace Merlin?AnswerQ&A
A later-generation vertical-takeoff aircraft, possibly beyond the Osprey's immediate successors.
- 3:56:39QuestionHow would a submarine use a surface-to-air missile?AnswerQ&A
As a last-ditch weapon against a nearby ASW helicopter, followed immediately by an attempt to dive and escape.
- 3:57:34QuestionCould an upgraded F-14 carry ten or more AMRAAMs because it could carry six Phoenix missiles?AnswerQ&A
Possibly, but the hardpoints would probably need modification, and both missile weight and mounting arrangements would matter.
- 3:57:58QuestionWhat separates an arsenal ship from a modern warship carrying many missiles?AnswerQ&A
A warship can sense, decide, and employ its weapons independently, while an arsenal ship is primarily a magazine for a wider network.
- 4:00:29QuestionHow did NATO answer the Alfa class submarine's very high speed?AnswerQ&A
Britain developed the much faster Spearfish torpedo, while the Alfa's own sensors became far less useful at top speed.
- 4:03:22QuestionWould Japan buy access to the Queen Elizabeth-class carrier design?AnswerQ&A
That seemed unlikely because Japan preferred its own designs and might want a newer starting point by the time it moved to carriers of that size.
- 4:03:53The 2020 case for replacing Albion and Bulwark with LHDsNotable Point
A 2020 proposal uses three LHDs to preserve amphibious lift while adding aviation and air-defence flexibility.
- 4:05:38QuestionWill the RAF or Royal Navy acquire another long-range maritime surveillance aircraft or bomber, given the cost and flexibility of aircraft compared with ships?AnswerQ&A
The RAF had already bought the P-8, and both shore-based patrol aircraft and carriers remain necessary for different tasks.
- 4:07:30QuestionWould future Royal Navy amphibious ships be home-built or use a foreign design?AnswerQ&A
British construction was expected, while Type 31 showed that a foreign-derived design could still offer the better starting point.
- 4:09:37QuestionWould Project Tempest and Japan's stealth-fighter effort work together?AnswerQ&A
The 2020 expectation was close cooperation and information sharing, with possible later U.S. participation, while Britain and Japan protected industrial work shares.
- 4:10:59QuestionWhy is the 2019 film Midway criticized even though it follows the battle's broad story?AnswerQ&A
Because broad plot fidelity does not fix omitted participants, inconsistent ship depictions, and other operational distortions.
- 4:12:14QuestionWho would buy Prince of Wales after possible post-COVID defence cuts, and which British service was most exposed?AnswerQ&A
A sale was considered unlikely, while the Army appeared more vulnerable because several programmes were exposed to cancellation.
- 4:14:01QuestionCould Prince of Wales help replace Bonhomme Richard with a Royal Navy crew and U.S. Marine Corps air group?AnswerQ&A
A broader arrangement for British carrier support in the Pacific was considered plausible, though no agreement was confirmed.
- 4:14:36QuestionWould a speculative battlecruiser or guided-missile destroyer design be more likely to receive consideration in Whitehall?AnswerQ&A
The destroyer, because a battlecruiser label was expected to invite funding cuts.
- 4:14:59QuestionWhat should be made of the warning that the recession after COVID could lead to World War III?AnswerQ&A
It raised a reasonable concern and appeared intended to strengthen the case against defence cuts.
- 4:17:24QuestionHow could NATO counter the Soviet Mike submarine operating below 1,000 metres?AnswerQ&A
Possible approaches were depth charges capable of reaching it or catching it in shallower water before it could dive deeply.