Q&A · 1:18:52-1:19:05

Why Nelson kept her 4.7-inch battery

A brief answer shows how new-construction priorities could block an apparently sensible secondary-battery modernization.

Question

Why did the Royal Navy not replace the Nelson class's 4.7-inch guns with 4.5-inch weapons?

Short answer

The available 4.5-inch production was already demanded by new capital ships and aircraft carriers, leaving little capacity for a lower-priority refit.

Notes

Competing demand explains why the Nelson class did not receive a 4.5-inch conversion. The weapons being produced were required for new capital ships and aircraft carriers. Those programmes took priority over replacing an existing battery on an older battleship. A sound refit proposal could therefore lose to scarce gun and mounting production elsewhere in the fleet plan.