Q&A ยท 1:04:38-1:07:09

Why carrier conversions decline without treaty limits

Without treaty-driven surplus hulls, navies have stronger reasons to build purpose-designed carriers instead of converting capital ships.

Question

Would navies still convert existing ships into aircraft carriers without the Washington Naval Treaty?

Short answer

Much less often; purpose-built carriers become more attractive when treaty rules do not make unfinished capital-ship hulls available for conversion.

Notes

The Courageous, Lexington, and Amagi conversions would disappear or become much less likely in a non-treaty world. Britain had learned from Furious and Hermes that a purpose-built carrier could be easier and more effective than a conversion. British development might proceed through improved Hermes-like ships toward progressively larger purpose-built carriers.