Video

Battle of Navarino(1827): A Failure of Deterrence or Expecting too Much?

Study Battle of Navarino(1827): A Failure of Deterrence or Expecting too Much?, a Dr. Alex Clarke video from 22 Oct 2022, with 24 time notes. Topics include Age Of Sail, Battle Of Navarino, Greek War Of Independence.

Date
Runtime1:37:51
Guide points24 time notes

Time notes

  1. 0:02
    Why Navarino slips from popular memory

    Wars with familiar cinematic narratives dominate popular memory, helping explain why Navarino and the Greek War of Independence receive less attention.

    Notable Point
  2. 3:11
    Why Navarino became a deterrence crisis

    Navarino began as an attempted show of force but became a fleet battle when violence spread from a fire ship and frigates to the ships of the line.

    Chapter
  3. 8:07
    The Greek revolt confronts Ottoman state power

    The Greek uprising's fractured start and the Ottoman state's greater resources explain why the independence movement was losing ground by 1827.

    Chapter
  4. 15:43
    Russian expansion reshapes the Greek question

    Britain and France intervene because any Russian-sponsored Greek victory could give St. Petersburg leverage over the Dardanelles and the eastern Mediterranean.

    Chapter
  5. 23:19
    Ottoman fragmentation and the Janissary vacuum

    The empire's divided Ottoman, Turkish, and Egyptian forces operate while the abolition of the Janissaries has left the sultan's army and command system dangerously weak.

    Chapter
  6. 30:13
    Edward Codrington's career before Navarino

    Codrington's record from the Glorious First of June and Trafalgar to amphibious operations shows why he was an experienced warfighter, but also foreshadows a command style built around decisive action.

    Chapter
  7. 37:12
    Contrasting the French and Russian admirals

    De Rigny's army-heavy background contrasts with Van Heiden's long Dutch and Russian naval career, shaping how the allied command distributed trust and responsibility.

    Chapter
  8. 41:42
    The British squadron and Dartmouth's small-craft role

    The British force combined modern two-deck ships of the line with frigates and small craft, while HMS Dartmouth coordinated the vessels needed to contain Ottoman fire ships and corvettes.

    Chapter
  9. 46:14
    The French squadron and the problem of partisan sources

    Conflicting accounts of French readiness and even ship armament demonstrate why historians must weigh a commander's interests, perspective, and later career when using operational reports.

    Notable Point
  10. 52:40
    Why Van Heiden chose Azov as his flagship

    Van Heiden selected Azov for Captain Lazarev's quality and the ship's shallower draft, prioritizing command effectiveness and access inside the bay over maximum size.

    Notable Point
  11. 54:04
    A large fleet with divided command

    The Ottoman-Egyptian armada possessed far more hulls and guns on paper, yet authority was split among Ottoman, Turkish, and Egyptian commanders beneath Ibrahim Pasha's influence.

    Chapter
  12. 58:18
    Why gun counts overstated Ottoman combat power

    Veteran crews, heavier weapons, and stronger hulls made allied ships of the line far more effective than the Ottoman fleet's larger total of guns suggested.

    Notable Point
  13. 1:01:28
    Competing strategies around the Ottoman fleet

    Codrington sought an overwhelming display that would compel withdrawal, while Austria supported the Ottomans as a direct barrier to Russian expansion.

    Chapter
  14. 1:04:07
    The weaknesses of the Ottoman horseshoe formation

    The Ottoman crescent packed smaller vessels behind the first line, but distance, weak shot, and the allies' anchored maneuvering reduced the supporting fire it was meant to create.

    Notable Point
  15. 1:05:59
    A peaceful entry staged as overwhelming confidence

    The allies entered ready for action but under orders to fire only if attacked, using close anchorage and even a brass band to signal confidence rather than an intention to open battle.

    Chapter
  16. 1:10:02
    The fire-ship clash that started Navarino

    Firing began when an Ottoman crew attacked boats sent from Dartmouth to stop a fire ship, drawing in musketry, Sirène, and then the guns of nearby warships.

    Chapter
  17. 1:12:09
    Scipion's crew fights fire under attack

    Scipion's sailors contained a fire beside the forward magazine while the gun crews kept fighting, demonstrating the training and cohesion behind allied combat power.

    Notable Point
  18. 1:15:11
    Breslau breaks formation to reinforce the line

    Breslau left the French formation to support the hard-pressed Albion and Azov, showing how individual initiative repaired gaps in the allied plan.

    Notable Point
  19. 1:17:56
    Asia's close-range flagship duel

    Asia first concentrated on one neighboring flagship, then joined Azov against another after Codrington's interpreter was killed and the second ship opened fire.

    Chapter
  20. 1:21:29
    Azov and Dartmouth collapse the Ottoman crescent

    Azov shattered major ships on the exposed end of the crescent, after which Dartmouth led the allied small craft against the remaining inner vessels.

    Chapter
  21. 1:23:17
    The Ottoman fleet's near-destruction

    By evening only eight of 78 Ottoman-Egyptian vessels remained seaworthy, with thousands killed or wounded despite attempted allied ceasefires.

    Notable Point
  22. 1:26:01
    A naval victory Britain did not want

    Navarino secured Ibrahim Pasha's withdrawal but weakened the Ottoman barrier against Russia, leaving Codrington celebrated as a victor yet removed and denied the normal rewards of success.

    Chapter
  23. 1:29:37
    Why deterrence depended on an admiral's reputation

    Codrington could impose withdrawal only after battle and renewed gunboat diplomacy; unlike Collingwood, he lacked a reputation powerful enough to make the threat itself settle the crisis.

    Chapter
  24. 1:33:49
    Navarino makes Greek independence possible

    Destroying the Ottoman-Egyptian fleet prevented reinforcement of Ibrahim Pasha, allowing a French expedition to compel evacuation and opening the way to modern Greek independence.

    Notable Point