Video
Battle of Navarino(1827): A Failure of Deterrence or Expecting too Much?
Study Battle of Navarino(1827): A Failure of Deterrence or Expecting too Much?, a Dr. Alex Clarke video from 22 Oct 2022, with 24 time notes. Topics include Age Of Sail, Battle Of Navarino, Greek War Of Independence.
Time notes
- 0:02Why Navarino slips from popular memoryNotable Point
Wars with familiar cinematic narratives dominate popular memory, helping explain why Navarino and the Greek War of Independence receive less attention.
- 3:11Why Navarino became a deterrence crisisChapter
Navarino began as an attempted show of force but became a fleet battle when violence spread from a fire ship and frigates to the ships of the line.
- 8:07The Greek revolt confronts Ottoman state powerChapter
The Greek uprising's fractured start and the Ottoman state's greater resources explain why the independence movement was losing ground by 1827.
- 15:43Russian expansion reshapes the Greek questionChapter
Britain and France intervene because any Russian-sponsored Greek victory could give St. Petersburg leverage over the Dardanelles and the eastern Mediterranean.
- 23:19Ottoman fragmentation and the Janissary vacuumChapter
The empire's divided Ottoman, Turkish, and Egyptian forces operate while the abolition of the Janissaries has left the sultan's army and command system dangerously weak.
- 30:13Edward Codrington's career before NavarinoChapter
Codrington's record from the Glorious First of June and Trafalgar to amphibious operations shows why he was an experienced warfighter, but also foreshadows a command style built around decisive action.
- 37:12Contrasting the French and Russian admiralsChapter
De Rigny's army-heavy background contrasts with Van Heiden's long Dutch and Russian naval career, shaping how the allied command distributed trust and responsibility.
- 41:42The British squadron and Dartmouth's small-craft roleChapter
The British force combined modern two-deck ships of the line with frigates and small craft, while HMS Dartmouth coordinated the vessels needed to contain Ottoman fire ships and corvettes.
- 46:14The French squadron and the problem of partisan sourcesNotable Point
Conflicting accounts of French readiness and even ship armament demonstrate why historians must weigh a commander's interests, perspective, and later career when using operational reports.
- 52:40Why Van Heiden chose Azov as his flagshipNotable Point
Van Heiden selected Azov for Captain Lazarev's quality and the ship's shallower draft, prioritizing command effectiveness and access inside the bay over maximum size.
- 54:04A large fleet with divided commandChapter
The Ottoman-Egyptian armada possessed far more hulls and guns on paper, yet authority was split among Ottoman, Turkish, and Egyptian commanders beneath Ibrahim Pasha's influence.
- 58:18Why gun counts overstated Ottoman combat powerNotable Point
Veteran crews, heavier weapons, and stronger hulls made allied ships of the line far more effective than the Ottoman fleet's larger total of guns suggested.
- 1:01:28Competing strategies around the Ottoman fleetChapter
Codrington sought an overwhelming display that would compel withdrawal, while Austria supported the Ottomans as a direct barrier to Russian expansion.
- 1:04:07The weaknesses of the Ottoman horseshoe formationNotable Point
The Ottoman crescent packed smaller vessels behind the first line, but distance, weak shot, and the allies' anchored maneuvering reduced the supporting fire it was meant to create.
- 1:05:59A peaceful entry staged as overwhelming confidenceChapter
The allies entered ready for action but under orders to fire only if attacked, using close anchorage and even a brass band to signal confidence rather than an intention to open battle.
- 1:10:02The fire-ship clash that started NavarinoChapter
Firing began when an Ottoman crew attacked boats sent from Dartmouth to stop a fire ship, drawing in musketry, Sirène, and then the guns of nearby warships.
- 1:12:09Scipion's crew fights fire under attackNotable Point
Scipion's sailors contained a fire beside the forward magazine while the gun crews kept fighting, demonstrating the training and cohesion behind allied combat power.
- 1:15:11Breslau breaks formation to reinforce the lineNotable Point
Breslau left the French formation to support the hard-pressed Albion and Azov, showing how individual initiative repaired gaps in the allied plan.
- 1:17:56Asia's close-range flagship duelChapter
Asia first concentrated on one neighboring flagship, then joined Azov against another after Codrington's interpreter was killed and the second ship opened fire.
- 1:21:29Azov and Dartmouth collapse the Ottoman crescentChapter
Azov shattered major ships on the exposed end of the crescent, after which Dartmouth led the allied small craft against the remaining inner vessels.
- 1:23:17The Ottoman fleet's near-destructionNotable Point
By evening only eight of 78 Ottoman-Egyptian vessels remained seaworthy, with thousands killed or wounded despite attempted allied ceasefires.
- 1:26:01A naval victory Britain did not wantChapter
Navarino secured Ibrahim Pasha's withdrawal but weakened the Ottoman barrier against Russia, leaving Codrington celebrated as a victor yet removed and denied the normal rewards of success.
- 1:29:37Why deterrence depended on an admiral's reputationChapter
Codrington could impose withdrawal only after battle and renewed gunboat diplomacy; unlike Collingwood, he lacked a reputation powerful enough to make the threat itself settle the crisis.
- 1:33:49Navarino makes Greek independence possibleNotable Point
Destroying the Ottoman-Egyptian fleet prevented reinforcement of Ibrahim Pasha, allowing a French expedition to compel evacuation and opening the way to modern Greek independence.