Why did the Royal Navy appear unenthusiastic about large cruisers?
Short answerTreaty limits blocked them in peacetime, and wartime production favored proven six-inch cruiser designs already moving through the yards.
NotesThe Royal Navy was not hostile to large cruisers, but the Washington system restricted the design space in peacetime. Britain considered 9.2-inch-gun ships comparable in role to an Alaska-class large cruiser, with nine- or twelve-gun arrangements among the possibilities. Once war began, yards could produce more useful ships faster by continuing six-inch cruiser families already in series rather than stopping lines to introduce a new type. Earlier 20,000- to 25,000-ton battlecruisers could cover some of the large-cruiser mission, but 40,000-ton capital ships could not be built in enough numbers for dispersed cruiser duties. That left a continuing conceptual niche for a roughly 15,000- to 20,000-ton cruiser even though Britain never put one into wartime production.