Q&A ยท 2:27:45-2:29:58

The cost argument against a 16.5-inch Colorado rebore

A counterfactual Colorado rearmament raises the question of whether a small calibre increase could justify its cost.

Question

Would the Colorado-class battleships have been rebored from 16-inch to 16.5-inch guns in response to a British move to that caliber?

Short answer

The panel expects rejection on cost grounds, judging the half-inch increase too small to justify reboring the existing guns.

Notes

The panel expects Congress to question the cost of reboring the Colorado-class guns for only another half inch of calibre. In that assessment, the increase would not offer enough additional capability to justify modifying the existing ships. A British 16.5-inch weapon could still influence a later American design. The answer concerns a hypothetical procurement decision, without identifying an actual congressional vote on such a conversion.