Related time notes
- Bruships 264: Naval History Questions Answered Live59:48The hull and machinery cost of a 35-knot WarspiteQ&A
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:01:50Tiger as the template for a counterfactual Queen ElizabethNotable Point
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:15:47Britain's rapid capital-ship expansionChapter
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?0:00Tiger and Queen Elizabeth approaching the fast battleshipChapter
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?1:48Overlapping programmes and different trial requirementsNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?6:27Why 24 knots still gave Queen Elizabeth tactical valueNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?7:53Interpreting the disputed Super Lion connectionNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?19:12Queen Elizabeth's deeper belts and selective protectionNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?21:03Hull shape trades speed against gun stability and manoeuvrabilityNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?21:53Construction volume allowed separate specialized hullsNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?28:38A rough three-month delay for the Tiger-based designChapter
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?33:03Queen Elizabeth's boiler and turbine combinationsChapter
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?41:29Hull proportions and the yards that could build themNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?43:05Battleship armour constrains boiler-room spaceNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?44:23Thirty-two boilers and Parsons turbinesNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?45:43A provisional armour and turret arrangementNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?47:50Keeping battleship beam on Tiger's longer hullNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?48:42Delayed entry, Gallipoli and Jutland availabilityChapter
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?49:38The unresolved design of the proposed sixth Queen ElizabethNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?51:10Why the estimate rounds up to 30,000 tonsNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?53:05Higher speed with battleship-like accelerationNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?55:08Fuel load, full displacement and Suez accessNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?1:03:32The proposed 28-knot speed remains uncertainNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?1:11:46Keeping Agincourt within the fast Queen Elizabeth designNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?1:16:32Fast Queen Elizabeths in Jutland's run to the southChapter
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?1:26:23Why Tiger and Queen Elizabeth remained separate designsNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?2:52National tonnage quotas and fleets of 35,000-ton shipsChapter
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?1:21:22Yamato’s historical design loses its intended opponentsNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?1:33:56Warspite’s machinery helps explain its modernizationNotable Point
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:20:47If Queen Elizabeth's crew had spotted the frogmenQ&A
- Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:41:07Would improved Revenges have triple 15-inch turrets?Q&A
- Churchill's Good ideas: the actually good, the bad, and the ridiculous15:07Oil fuel and Britain's dependence on overseas suppliesChapter
- Churchill's Good ideas: the actually good, the bad, and the ridiculous1:36:55The 16.5-inch project and alternative British gun developmentNotable Point
- Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:16:00A 1930s Falklands attack meets overwhelming British sea powerQ&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:00:23Ten-gun Queen Elizabeths at 28 knotsQ&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:22:28Queen Elizabeths with 16.5-inch guns reshape the naval raceQ&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live4:06:38Larger Queen Elizabeths price Germany out of the naval raceQ&A
- What happens if instead of Gallipoli, Fisher gets Churchill to go for the Baltic? (Patreon)2:13:22Would HMS Warspite survive the Baltic battle?Q&A
- What happens if instead of Gallipoli, Fisher gets Churchill to go for the Baltic? (Patreon)2:44:26How triple turrets could lead to a faster Queen ElizabethNotable Point
- What happens if the French navy goes all Free French in 1940?1:01:36Fast ships find the fight and heavy ships close inNotable Point
- What happens if the French navy goes all Free French in 1940?1:11:55Which capital ships could reinforce the Far East in late 1941?Notable Point
- Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:32:35A sudden Bayern fleet and Britain's maximum responseQ&A
- What would need to change for HMAS Australia & HMS New Zealand to be retained under Washington?4:53Canada's stop-start fleet policy slows the 1909 schemeNotable Point
- What would need to change for HMAS Australia & HMS New Zealand to be retained under Washington?25:56Battlecruiser orders could preserve the battleship programmeNotable Point
- WWI delayed by six years? What would the Navies look like? (Patreon Alternate History)1:17:37Bayern and Queen Elizabeth solved different fleet problemsQ&A
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...9:12A 23-knot British battle line and German design pressureQ&A
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:24:34From faster Orions to an early fast-battleship standardQ&A
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:09:40A World War II US Navy appearing in 1910Q&A
- What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?1:32A rough hull comparison puts Tiger near existing 15-inch shipsNotable Point
- What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?1:01:03Fleet depth supports faster Queen Elizabeth refits and live raider exercisesNotable Point
- Bruships 242: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:51:27A U.S. fleet standardized on Queen ElizabethQ&A
- Five Topics which tend to lead to me debating vigorously with other historians... (Patreon Live)1:36:16Reconstructing the sixth Queen Elizabeth-class battleshipNotable Point
- Bruships 241: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:49:18German naval design without Versailles limitsQ&A
- Bruships 239: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...53:41Tiger as a small-tube boiler test bedQ&A
- What happens if Winston Churchill doesn't pause the Carriers, Fast Battleships & Cruisers in 1939?46:27A smaller Italian battle fleet frees Queen Elizabeth-class shipsNotable Point
- What happens if Winston Churchill doesn't pause the Carriers, Fast Battleships & Cruisers in 1939?1:03:16Attacking Graf Zeppelin before the German battleshipsNotable Point
- Could the Royal Navy have lauched a Carrier Strike in WWI on Wilhelmshaven?46:24The proposed Agincourt's armament remains disputedNotable Point
- Lions not Indefatigables; What if Australia & New Zealand go Battlecruiser not Battle Cruiser...1:00:46The foreign impact of introducing 15-inch guns in TigerChapter
- Lions not Indefatigables; What if Australia & New Zealand go Battlecruiser not Battle Cruiser...1:03:45How two 15-inch Tigers complicate Renown and Queen ElizabethNotable Point
- Building for the Adriatic: Austro-Hungarian Destroyers of WWI...15:59How rising warship costs pressed Germany's naval budgetNotable Point
- Bruships 235: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:54:53How superfiring turrets could reshape British dreadnoughtsQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:05:25A larger Queen Elizabeth, Revenge, and Renown fleetQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:11:06How extra battleships make reconstruction easierNotable Point
- Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:48:13What if Germany deployed battlecruisers to its colonies?Q&A
- Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:44:16Reading Queen Elizabeth as a transitional battleshipQ&A
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?2:15Tiger, Hood, and the battlecruiser spectrumNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?49:47New-ship declarations and protective feed-water tanksChapter
- Naval Architecture from Turret Ironclads to Super Dreadnoughts: HMS Monarch 1868 & 1911...44:03How a fourteen-inch Orion could have changed later gun choicesNotable Point
- An introduction to Torpedo Boat Destoyers34:19The torpedo boat destroyer closes the light-force cycleNotable Point
- An introduction to Torpedo Boat Destoyers44:18Naval budgets shaped the light-force balance at JutlandNotable Point
- Bruships 225: Naval History & Current Affairs Questions Answered Live...2:33:49Twenty-eight-knot Queen Elizabeths would bring the fast battleship forward a generationQ&A
- Bruships 225: Naval History & Current Affairs Questions Answered Live...2:40:38What would 28-knot Queen Elizabeths imply for the R class?Q&A
- What changes if the Royal Navy gets a Proper Staff in 1905, instead relying on NID for everything?55:30A post-1908 capital-ship building standardChapter
- Lions not Indefatigables - the Dominions chose to build 13.5in Battlecruisers prior to WWI...29:53Why did capital ships adopt small-tube boilers slowly?Q&A
- Lions not Indefatigables - the Dominions chose to build 13.5in Battlecruisers prior to WWI...1:18:21A 15-inch Tiger and fast-battleship convergenceChapter
- Lions not Indefatigables - the Dominions chose to build 13.5in Battlecruisers prior to WWI...1:23:12Would Queen Elizabeth adopt triple turrets or better boilers?Q&A
- Lions not Indefatigables - the Dominions chose to build 13.5in Battlecruisers prior to WWI...1:27:18Dogger Bank with faster, heavier British shipsChapter
- Lions not Indefatigables - the Dominions chose to build 13.5in Battlecruisers prior to WWI...1:31:16Could Queen Elizabeth join the Dogger Bank force?Notable Point
- Lions not Indefatigables - the Dominions chose to build 13.5in Battlecruisers prior to WWI...1:38:36Heavy guns and director fire control at Dogger BankNotable Point
- Lions not Indefatigables - the Dominions chose to build 13.5in Battlecruisers prior to WWI...1:53:14Dogger Bank damage and future capital-ship designNotable Point
- Lions not Indefatigables - the Dominions chose to build 13.5in Battlecruisers prior to WWI...2:05:54How would Queen Elizabeth change after a 15-inch Tiger?Q&A
- Lions not Indefatigables - the Dominions chose to build 13.5in Battlecruisers prior to WWI...2:16:21Why a Vickers triple turret would not guarantee adoptionQ&A
- Lions not Indefatigables - the Dominions chose to build 13.5in Battlecruisers prior to WWI...2:20:14Would a greater Dogger Bank victory change Gallipoli?Q&A
- Lions not Indefatigables - the Dominions chose to build 13.5in Battlecruisers prior to WWI...2:26:53Fast-battleship convergence and the Admiral classQ&A
- Lions not Indefatigables - the Dominions chose to build 13.5in Battlecruisers prior to WWI...2:35:33Why the alternate Admirals follow the fast-battleship lineNotable Point
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:29:59Designing an R-class counterpart to the Iowa classQ&A
- 3 Books to understand the USN, RN & IJN preperations for WWII! Key Books 338:25Scheme J1's paper fleet for war with JapanChapter
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle16:47Designing Queen Elizabeth and Revenge for a treaty-limited futureQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon7:46:49Scaling the Queen Elizabeth class for 18-inch gunsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust3:18:22How neutral Italy could release battleships for northern watersNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust4:52:14Tiger Cubs and the route from armored cruiser to fast battleshipQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust4:54:18Why comparing Tiger and Hood complicates fast-battleship labelsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress7:26:10Why battleships carried 15-inch shrapnel shellsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy I1:53:37Long-range 15-inch fire and a different JutlandQ&A
- Bruships 214 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:26:36Reusing battleship names in a no-treaty fleetQ&A
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?18:03Germany's battleship pause shaped the balance at JutlandQ&A
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?27:52Revised Queen Elizabeth designs offered several replies to L20Notable Point
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:32:12A less conservative Queen Elizabeth designQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:33:20Would 16.5-inch British guns push America to 18 inches?Q&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:56:50Scaling Queen Elizabeth to octuple 20-inch turretsQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:12:44Canada funds rather than crews three Queen ElizabethsQ&A
- Sir Eustace Tennyson d'Eyncourt: WWI Royal Navy's Director of Naval Construction27:36Incremental warship design as risk controlChapter
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?27:25Why Queen Elizabeth traded two guns for speedChapter
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?37:36Why the cancelled Agincourt is difficult to reconstructChapter
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?39:37The case for an Agincourt with six 18-inch gunsNotable Point
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?41:13Could Agincourt have carried three triple 15-inch turrets?Q&A
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?56:55Tsushima made battle-line cohesion the prewar lessonNotable Point
- Bruships 206: Naval History Questions Answered Live...37:02A larger Royal Navy reshapes WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 206: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:31:00A heavier Revenge class could gain speedQ&A
- Britain's Declaration of War in 1914: The July Crisis & how the British Empire Joined WWI...1:15:05Why Germany lost the dreadnought raceNotable Point
- Bruships 204: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:22:44Royal Navy capital ships replace the Pearl Harbor battle lineQ&A
- Bruships 204: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:32:58Why super-battleship labels lose their meaningQ&A
- Fortress Crete: What if the Greek Government had invested in Crete in the 1920s & 30s?44:04The invasion becomes a Mediterranean fleet battleChapter
- Why didn't the Royal Navy go for High Pressure boilers & what if they got 850psi boilers in 1934?16:56Warspite as the 850 psi test caseChapter
- Why didn't the Royal Navy go for High Pressure boilers & what if they got 850psi boilers in 1934?27:43Barham exposes the cost of refitting twiceNotable Point
- Why didn't the Royal Navy go for High Pressure boilers & what if they got 850psi boilers in 1934?1:11:08Extra speed opens a surface-bombardment window at TarantoNotable Point
- Bruships 201: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:22:27Agincourt as a Queen Elizabeth squadron flagshipQ&A
- Bruships 201: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:23:43Agincourt as a machinery and weapons testbedQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 12: Not Pocket Battleships, No Guadalcanal and a load of Submarine Signals?54:13Could a stronger naval staff have fixed British shells before the First World War?Q&A
- Scuttlebutt 12: Not Pocket Battleships, No Guadalcanal and a load of Submarine Signals?58:00A 24-knot battle line would pressure British and American successorsNotable Point
- Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:20:02Why Britain could not rebuild every capital ship at onceQ&A
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?0:00Queen Elizabeth historiography and selective evidenceNotable Point
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?1:09What really went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth class?Q&A
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?2:08Too many cooks shaped the Queen Elizabeth designChapter
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?8:15The fast wing of the Grand FleetChapter
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?13:51Fisher, Churchill, and the compromise designChapter
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?18:22Boiler count, power, and the missing hull lengthNotable Point
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?22:04The 15-inch gun and the three-change ruleChapter
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?25:30Derfflinger and the speed required by the missionNotable Point
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?36:25A truncated hull, forward secondaries, and compromised armorChapter
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?47:07Weight was a consequence, not the flawChapter
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?55:13Ideal sketches were not procurement designsNotable Point
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?56:24Strategic restraint behind the finished classChapter
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:42:38Modernised Queen Elizabeths and Revenges give Britain ten fast battleshipsQ&A
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?1:31:53A capital-ship program without the We Want Eight crisisChapter
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?1:40:29Would the enlarged program end Germany's naval race sooner?Q&A
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?1:44:13Would staff reform give the Queen Elizabeths small-tube boilers?Q&A
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?1:45:25Could the Revenge class become faster Queen Elizabeth follow-ons?Q&A
- Bruships 198: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:39:03A 1912 US policy change could arm Pennsylvania with 16-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...37:34KGV's 14-inch gun versus the older 15-inch weaponQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 11: from SDSR to Pearl Harbor, with a stop at CVA-01 along the way...42:47An F3-style alternative for Nelson and RodneyNotable Point
- Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:38:09Applying King George V-style belt armor to older battleshipsQ&A
- Battle of Jutland: The Strategic Leadership which both defined it and denied it satisfaction56:41The German plan to bombard SunderlandChapter
- Battle of Jutland: The Strategic Leadership which both defined it and denied it satisfaction1:08:35Jutland accelerated fire-control investmentNotable Point
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...43:26If the US Navy jumped from twelve- to fifteen-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...45:14How a 16.5-inch gun could change the Queen Elizabeth designNotable Point
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...51:08Would the proposed Agincourt have carried 18-inch guns?Q&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:25:13An Italian-style reconstruction of HMS WarspiteQ&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:29:45How the R and Queen Elizabeth classes used their casemate gunsQ&A
- Admiral Scheer: Germany's answer to the wrong question?53:55Scheer's Jutland plan met a changed British forceChapter
- Admiral Scheer: Germany's answer to the wrong question?55:07Jutland intelligence failed in both directionsNotable Point
- Admiral Scheer: Germany's answer to the wrong question?58:58The High Seas Fleet chased ships it could not catchChapter
- Admiral Scheer: Germany's answer to the wrong question?1:01:11Scheer read success into uncertain damage reportsNotable Point
- Jellicoe's Jutland: Analytical leadership at its best and its most problematic44:08Jellicoe's path toward the fast battleshipNotable Point
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:12:59Who launched HMS Queen Elizabeth in 1913?Q&A
- Bruships 191: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:10:31How the panel would modernize HMS WarspiteQ&A
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!14:42Greenboy shells and the Battle of JutlandNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!1:10:38Canadian Queen Elizabeths and the case for F3Q&A
- HMS Queen Mary: An Evolutionary Ship in a Time of Fleet Transition7:52From battlecruisers toward fast battleshipsNotable Point
- HMS Queen Mary: An Evolutionary Ship in a Time of Fleet Transition22:40Could battlecruisers have served as technology testbeds?Notable Point
- HMS Queen Mary: An Evolutionary Ship in a Time of Fleet Transition52:44An all-oil Queen Mary and a faster battle lineNotable Point
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?1:09:44Dreadnought growth quickly outpaces the treaty limitChapter
- The Royal Navy's Transition from Coal to Oil: HMS Spiteful to HMS Queen Elizabeth1:07:20The Queen Elizabeth class marked oil's operational maturityChapter
- The Royal Navy's Transition from Coal to Oil: HMS Spiteful to HMS Queen Elizabeth1:10:27What if the Queen Elizabeth class had remained coal-fired?Notable Point
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:40:18A faster New Mexico class triggers a battleship speed raceQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:38:55Faster 16-inch US Standard battleshipsQ&A
- Royal Navy gets activist for Research & Development from 1900 onwards...1:36:48Jellicoe's path toward a 30-knot fast battleshipChapter
- Flotillas of the Danube: A River Runs Through It!23:03Reconstructing an unbuilt Queen Elizabeth-class battleshipNotable Point
- What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?1:01:55Fast Nelsons could redirect Queen Elizabeth-class reconstruction toward speedNotable Point
- Tribal Class of 1907: The WWI Channel Response Force6:28Fisher's 33-knot requirement and a builder competitionChapter
- Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...2:13:09Queen Elizabeth rebuilds complete a 28-knot battle lineNotable Point
- Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...2:47:10Could Australian docks support a Queen Elizabeth?Q&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?51:50A Queen Elizabeth with twenty 11-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 173: Christmas Books for the History Lover in your life...1:37:12When extra battleship speed stops payingNotable Point
- Just 10 Days of Submarine Sinkings53:34How U-331 penetrated the screen and sank HMS BarhamChapter
- Scuttlebutt 8: Beatty, Sopwith Cuckoos, Carriers & the Defence Debate...1:05:57How conservative choices limited the Queen Elizabeth classNotable Point
- Bruships 172: So the Historiophon Happened...3:43:59Canadian Queen Elizabeths would reshape two wars and the treaty systemQ&A
- Of Two Submarines, in two wars... The sinkings of HMHS Britannic & IJS Kongo2:32:09Barham's interwar modernisation and its limitsNotable Point
- Of Two Submarines, in two wars... The sinkings of HMHS Britannic & IJS Kongo2:33:41U-331's point-blank attack on HMS BarhamChapter
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/41:13:40Queen Elizabeth boiler and gun choices under technical uncertaintyNotable Point
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/41:15:38Jellicoe's Queen Elizabeth concept as the fleet's anvilNotable Point
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/43:44:28Four Queen Elizabeths for each Dominion and the treaty balanceQ&A
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/45:20:09A 15-inch/45 gun for King George V and older battleshipsQ&A
- World of Warships Colab 1, Questions & U Class subs: Second 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 2/438:09Queen Elizabeth as a design benchmark for NagatoNotable Point
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/41:33:01Why Warspite's steering defect resisted a simple diagnosisQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/46:17:33A quick-firing 130 mm gun makes rebuild weight the limiting factorQ&A
- The Battlecruiser/Fast Battleship Differential & Soviet Carriers: Scuttlebutt 718:38Cruiser-line speed sets the fast-battleship thresholdNotable Point
- The Battlecruiser/Fast Battleship Differential & Soviet Carriers: Scuttlebutt 71:22:47Beatty, staff work, and signalling at JutlandQ&A
- So what happens in the Pacific if Italy stays neutral for WWII?40:28Building a powerful Indian Ocean fleetChapter
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!37:30American scouts for a faster Grand Fleet divisionNotable Point
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!3:49:11Elizabeth I receives two generations of namesake warshipsQ&A
- Frigating Tiger Cubs: WWI if the Royal Navy builds some 9.2in armed 'Dreadnought Cruisers'2:13:48The 'We Want Eight' compromise shows Admiralty leverageNotable Point
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...38:10A test case for faster Queen ElizabethsNotable Point
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...1:30:26Jutland with a weaker German scouting forceChapter
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song4:22:07New hulls for Queen Elizabeth and Revenge turrets would become VanguardsQ&A
- Beatty of the Mediterranean: Finding the Right Peg for the Right Hole?1:05:41Freed capital ships reshape other theatresNotable Point
- Beatty of the Mediterranean: Finding the Right Peg for the Right Hole?1:12:42Why the 28-knot cruiser line mattersNotable Point
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....2:42:43Small-tube boilers for Queen ElizabethQ&A
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....4:10:34Twelve-gun Queen Elizabeths and the prewar arms raceQ&A
- V.Adm Beatty is sent to Command the Mediterranean Battle Cruisers in 1914... Patreon 10534:58Fast ships protecting the Grand Fleet's battle lineNotable Point
- V.Adm Beatty is sent to Command the Mediterranean Battle Cruisers in 1914... Patreon 1051:03:57Beatty as an advocate for forcing the DardanellesChapter
- V.Adm Beatty is sent to Command the Mediterranean Battle Cruisers in 1914... Patreon 1051:15:28Would taking Constantinople require a destructive bombardment?Q&A
- V.Adm Beatty is sent to Command the Mediterranean Battle Cruisers in 1914... Patreon 1052:10:53Why Queen Elizabeth still belongs in the North Sea calculationQ&A
- Bruships 165: I saw a Poodle with a Kalax Manual in his hand, walking through the moors of cornwall1:50:40Why the Queen Elizabeth class missed its expected speedQ&A
- For History: Which Three ships should never have been scrapped?5:07How budgets shaped the Anglo-German naval raceNotable Point
- For History: Which Three ships should never have been scrapped?45:39HMS Warspite and Britain's lost battleship generationNotable Point
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!10:40A Royal Navy 15-inch/50 upgrade programQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!4:00:58Twenty-six-knot Queen Elizabeths in the MediterraneanQ&A
- The Nimitz Class: The Tenacious Ten that underpin America on the Global Stage58:50Britain’s battleship building supplies the Nimitz analogyNotable Point
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat2:55:20Extra displacement would not make every First World War battleship fasterQ&A
- Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!1:38:58Faster Queen Elizabeth refits require protection tradeoffsQ&A
- Bruships 159: New Office - This may be quick, discord may work & I may not have a Pneumonia attack!49:52Why a uniform Queen Elizabeth-class refit would be preferableQ&A
- Bruships 159: New Office - This may be quick, discord may work & I may not have a Pneumonia attack!58:14Eight 18-inch guns would turn a Queen Elizabeth enlargement into a Hood-size shipQ&A
- Bruships 159: New Office - This may be quick, discord may work & I may not have a Pneumonia attack!1:07:43Queen Elizabeth was the next-best museum candidate after WarspiteQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 4: A Wide Variety of Comments28:50Why rebuilding an old battleship cannot be reduced to horsepowerQ&A
- Check Campaign 23: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:01:13Secret warship projects and the limits of surviving archivesNotable Point
- Bruships 157: Books so good they've blown the budget on the #ScandiShip24 tour already!27:46Small-tube boilers and a faster Jutland battle lineQ&A
- Bruships 157: Books so good they've blown the budget on the #ScandiShip24 tour already!1:16:18Canadian fast battleships could reinforce the Third Battlecruiser SquadronQ&A
- Kongōs at Jutland: IJN goes all or nothing in the North Sea in WWI... Patreon Premier 31:25:03Fresh Queen Elizabeths could lead Jellicoe's battle lineNotable Point
- Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign31:00A reference for Queen Elizabeth and Hood armor layoutsQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?49:43A five-turret Queen Elizabeth-class designQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?1:23:13Enlarged Orions and a triple-turret battle lineQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?2:01:16Colorado-class battleships at Queen Elizabeth speedQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?2:26:44Could Queen Elizabeth fight at Dogger Bank?Q&A
- Bruships 154: Ship-Shape's Scandi Ship 2024... answering naval history questions...41:00How wartime priorities constrained Britain's later battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships 154: Ship-Shape's Scandi Ship 2024... answering naval history questions...2:32:07Six Queen Elizabeths and eight Revenge-class ships at JutlandQ&A
- Bruships 154: Ship-Shape's Scandi Ship 2024... answering naval history questions...2:35:50Canadian Queen Elizabeths would not instantly create battleship yardsQ&A
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!1:46:27If the Queen Elizabeth class made only 21 knotsQ&A
- Bruships 152: Patreon July Premiers Announcement, Special Guests & Naval History Questions Answered2:51:11A larger-gunned Neptune accelerates the dreadnought raceQ&A
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion47:37Queen Elizabeth class tests the limits of design conservatismNotable Point
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off2:59:46Using a larger Queen Elizabeth hull for speedQ&A
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off3:02:27Why torpedo-room weight is more than its machineryQ&A
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off3:23:14Would triple-turret Queen Elizabeths reach Jutland?Q&A
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off3:50:59Triple-turret Queen Elizabeths at JutlandQ&A
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends1:02:40A 26.5-knot Queen Elizabeth class in two world warsQ&A
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends2:10:39Replacing the R class with more Queen ElizabethsQ&A
- Taranto Zero: Japan joins WWII on side of Britain in June 1940 - Patreon Alternate History1:28:35Slow battleships block Atlantic routes while fast forces hunt raidersNotable Point
- USS Triton (SSRN-586): First Submerged Cirumnavigation of the World14:24British 18-inch battleships would change Washington's bargainingNotable Point
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign12:10How a Tillman treaty fleet tightens blockade pressureQ&A
- Bruships 148: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Begins2:38:02Why battle squadrons sought eight similar shipsQ&A
- Bruships 148: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Begins2:48:19Why eight-ship post-dreadnought classes were rareQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed2:42:24An all-Queen Elizabeth British fleet at JutlandQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed3:00:38Nine fast Queen Elizabeths and the Washington treatyQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed3:44:45How triple turrets cascade through British capital shipsQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed3:49:04The American response to a twelve-gun Queen ElizabethQ&A
- Patreon 101: If Lord Fisher died in Jan 1914, how does Prince Louis of Battenberg perform as 1SL?1:05:04Completing Renown and Repulse as Revenge-class battleshipsChapter
- Patreon 101: If Lord Fisher died in Jan 1914, how does Prince Louis of Battenberg perform as 1SL?1:10:03Why a fast battleship was feasible in 1914Q&A
- Patreon 101: If Lord Fisher died in Jan 1914, how does Prince Louis of Battenberg perform as 1SL?1:13:30Reconstructing Agincourt's design and possible completionNotable Point
- Patreon 101: If Lord Fisher died in Jan 1914, how does Prince Louis of Battenberg perform as 1SL?1:18:49Agincourt's armour judged by 1914 standardsNotable Point
- Patreon 101: If Lord Fisher died in Jan 1914, how does Prince Louis of Battenberg perform as 1SL?2:17:00Jutland with tighter information and command linksChapter
- Patreon 101: If Lord Fisher died in Jan 1914, how does Prince Louis of Battenberg perform as 1SL?2:22:23Why would Jellicoe choose the fast Agincourt as his flagship?Q&A
- Check Campaign 12: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:32:07Could prewar spending have deterred Germany?Notable Point
- Bruships 145: Naval History Questions Answered & Will it be lego building or book boxing?2:27:20Could small-tube boilers make Queen Elizabeth a 28-knot battleship?Q&A
- Patreon 99: What would Imperial Star Destroyers look if designed by 1938 USN, RN, KM, IJN, RM & SN?44:18Royal Navy logic: modernize a proven carrier-battleshipChapter
- Patreon 99: What would Imperial Star Destroyers look if designed by 1938 USN, RN, KM, IJN, RM & SN?2:12:29Could a fast Agincourt have displaced the battlecruiser?Q&A
- Check Campaign 10: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign25:39A twelve-gun Queen Elizabeth counterfactualNotable Point
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books32:01Why a British-Austro-Hungarian battle is a fleet problemQ&A
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books2:18:20Ten fast battleships under a larger treaty allowanceNotable Point
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books2:26:50Which British battleships could defeat the Rivadavia classQ&A
- HMS Revenge(1915): the Reliable Pikeman of the Royal Navys Battle Line!0:01Why the Revenge class deserves a second lookChapter
- HMS Revenge(1915): the Reliable Pikeman of the Royal Navys Battle Line!35:46Armor, machinery, and the speed tradeoffChapter
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!1:29:23Battleship torpedoes guaranteed a way to finish a disabled enemyQ&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!1:36:09Starting World War I with 1918 technology accelerates a deadlier arms cycleQ&A
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty9:04Why Tillman wanted a maximum battleshipChapter
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty19:11Britain prices Germany out of the risk-fleet contestNotable Point
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty1:00:48Britain answers with faster Nelson alternativesChapter
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty1:21:36Continuous construction builds a faster wartime fleetChapter
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty1:30:17One 15-inch/50 project could rearm the British fleetNotable Point
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered1:24:28Why the Queen Elizabeth class began with five shipsQ&A
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered2:23:30Britain's answer to 28-knot German battleshipsQ&A
- Check Campaign 4: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:31:36Which Royal Navy names carry first-rate prestige?Q&A
- Check Campaign 4: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:34:31A twelve-gun Queen Elizabeth-class counterfactualNotable Point
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered2:02:08How German triple turrets could reshape British dreadnoughtsQ&A
- HMS Unicorn: Honestly Not An Aircraft Carrier - Key Ship Series 8, Ship 122:30Henderson treats standardisation as a fleet-wide multiplierNotable Point
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time45:07More Queen Elizabeths and Admirals harden Britain's treaty positionQ&A
- Patreon 94: The different types of Aircraft Carriers/Seaplane Carriers/Hybrids2:39:42Would a faster Revenge class become much heavier?Q&A
- Patreon 94: The different types of Aircraft Carriers/Seaplane Carriers/Hybrids2:42:56At what speed was the Revenge hull most efficient?Q&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books3:28:13How 28-knot Queen Elizabeths change the Bismarck huntQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!58:38The Royal Navy's most powerful commissioned battleshipQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:18:01Could Britain field the 15-inch gun earlier?Q&A
- What Happens If Whittle is supported & Britain develops Jet Engines + Gas Turbines in 1930s1:00:13Gas turbines transform interwar capital-ship reconstructionsChapter
- Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!26:11Small-tube boilers could create a 28-knot British battle lineQ&A
- Patreon 92: Frank Whittle is given consistent funding by Britain to develop jet engines from 19281:36:27Gas turbines transform interwar capital-ship reconstructionsChapter
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...1:31:56Queen Elizabeth and Revenge begin replacing the 12-inch battle fleetQ&A
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...1:58:41Series construction brings Queen Elizabeths by 1916 and Revenges by 1917Q&A
- HMS Warspite: The Survivor - KSS3 S3 Comment Response3:34Could eight boilers have made Warspite a fast battleship?Q&A
- HMS Warspite: The Survivor - KSS3 S3 Comment Response17:00How reconstruction reshaped battleship appearanceNotable Point
- USS Texas: Always Bigger in Spirit - KSS3 S2 Comment Response13:20Tankers waiting for British naval oil storageNotable Point
- Naval Historian Reacts to Aircraft Carriers the Debate Part 2 of 236:12Pre-war carrier groups broken by wartime lossesNotable Point
- Naval Historian Reacts to Aircraft Carriers the Debate Part 2 of 21:13:03Interwar amphibious experimentationNotable Point
- The Royal Navys Response to a 1906 Dante Alighieri15:48Why the British battleship aims for 26 knotsChapter
- Tillman Class: Dreams of Super Battleships - KSS2 S8 Comment Response48:06An F3 and 15-inch/50 path reshapes the interwar fleetNotable Point
- Stalingrad Class: Stalin's Ship Dreams - KSS2 S7 Comment Response13:26Britain's reserve of 15-inch and 14-inch gunsQ&A
- Scharnhorst Class(1936): Most Valued Player of the German Capital Ships - Key Ships Series 7 Ship 442:21Why speed bought a surface raider timeNotable Point
- The Amagi Class: Super Kongos or Nascent Fast Battleships? - KSS2 S5 Comment Response15:03What survives of the planned HMS Agincourt designQ&A
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out1:17:17Renown's turrets inform the debate over the proposed AgincourtNotable Point
- Operation Berlin: Tour De Force or Tour De Farce?1:10:33Malaya blocked the attack on SL 67Chapter
- Operation Berlin: Tour De Force or Tour De Farce?1:32:35Tovey reinforced the Iceland blocking forceNotable Point
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy2:02:21The R class was not designed as second-line battleshipsQ&A
- Building A British Super Battleship!50:57How closely does the game model historical warship cost?Q&A
- HMVS Cerberus: KSS1 S4 Comment Response11:40Completed G3 and N3 ships reshape treaty bargainingNotable Point
- SMS Seydlitz - The Pivotol 4th German Battlecruiser - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 922:10Seydlitz's shrinking speed advantageChapter
- HMS Benbow: KSS1 S3 Comment Response4:10Small-tube boilers for a hypothetical Queen Elizabeth upgradeNotable Point
- HMS Dreadnought: Key Ship Series 1 Ship 1 Comment Response6:36Small-tube boilers and a 28-knot battle lineQ&A
- HMS Dreadnought: Key Ship Series 1 Ship 1 Comment Response56:27Oil firing and an alternate fast-battleship fleetQ&A
- Check Campaign: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign37:34A Spanish Queen Elizabeth-based battleship proposal dies unbuiltNotable Point
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases51:49A Royal Navy jump to 16-inch guns reshapes treaty arithmeticQ&A
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases1:06:39Why HMS Queen Elizabeth is the useful name-game answer for 1982Q&A
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty41:02A Royal Navy programme that sustains shipbuildingChapter
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...9:40Germany's L20 and the appeal of 16.5-inch gunsNotable Point
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...1:16:57Normandie, Lyon, and French design momentumChapter
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty2:08:31Fast battleships could shift Italy toward fast light cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series1:18:36The R class needed a trade-offQ&A
- WWII if Norway Wins & Operation Weserübung Fails...1:19:11A stronger Far Eastern fleet changes Japanese choicesChapter
- Orion Class - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 729:22Orion as the British dreadnought patternChapter
- Jutland with Competent Leadership of the British Battlecruiser Fleet - Sturdee replaces Beatty41:42Keeping the Fifth Battle Squadron within signal rangeChapter
- Jutland with Competent Leadership of the British Battlecruiser Fleet - Sturdee replaces Beatty45:53Speed and the capital-ship spectrumNotable Point
- Neptune Class: The Cruiser Conundrum Crisis - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 623:32A cruiser with capital-ship dimensions and crewNotable Point
- Patreon 86: Jutland with Competent British Battlecruiser Fleet Commander - Sturdee replaces Beatty2:34:23Fast battleships after a different JutlandNotable Point
- USS North Dakota(BB-29): The USN's First True Dreadnought - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 825:47Centerline guns in the Anglo-American qualitative raceChapter
- King George V(1911) Class: Why the Orion Class didn't stick as 'Super Dreadnoughts'1:43How boiler choice limited the Queen Elizabeths' speed goalNotable Point
- King George V(1911) Class: Why the Orion Class didn't stick as 'Super Dreadnoughts'10:37Why the Orion class did not keep the 'super-dreadnought' labelNotable Point
- King George V(1911) Class: Why the Orion Class didn't stick as 'Super Dreadnoughts'12:04Larger British orders and pressure on Germany's naval raceNotable Point
- King George V(1911) Class: Why the Orion Class didn't stick as 'Super Dreadnoughts'25:13Treaty-era presence missions and worldwide serviceChapter
- Ersatz Yorck Class: Trying to Be All Things - Key Ships Series 4, Episode 329:00Caught between the battle line and the scouting roleNotable Point
- Being the Benchmark Navy: It has Costs as well as Benefits20:21Queen Elizabeths and the Argincourt counterfactualNotable Point
- Being the Benchmark Navy: It has Costs as well as Benefits21:07Why the Queen Elizabeths stopped short of the benchmarkNotable Point
- Being the Benchmark Navy: It has Costs as well as Benefits23:26Design clues behind the proposed ArgincourtNotable Point
- Being the Benchmark Navy: It has Costs as well as Benefits33:22Argincourt simulation: range, firepower, and fleet contextNotable Point
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 52:55:32Balancing a survivable Queen Elizabeth-class conceptChapter
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 53:16:21A modern hull gives the design a better starting pointChapter
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 53:27:30Weight and trim defeat the second Queen Elizabeth designChapter
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!1:42:09How fast French and Italian ships could reshape Britain's treaty fleetQ&A
- Number 13 Class: Dreams of Yamatos - Key Ship Series 4, Ship 622:39Hiraga's design lineage from Nagato to Number 13Notable Point
- H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 40:01Paper strength versus industrial realityChapter
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?2:53:25How F3 guns could have changed British battleship refitsNotable Point
- Dominating the World from Second Place: Alfred Von Tirpitz & his 'Risk Fleet' Theory37:33Army priority also constrained repair and recoveryChapter
- Dominating the World from Second Place: Alfred Von Tirpitz & his 'Risk Fleet' Theory40:20Queen Elizabeth class raised Germany's costsNotable Point
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...32:50Canadian economy versus visible deterrenceNotable Point
- Governments of the Washington Treaty: What were their priorities?1:40:03Would Canada preserve a treaty-era battleship?Q&A
- Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture42:26How triple-turret Königs could have changed British battleship plansNotable Point
- Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers & Battlecruisers of pre-WWI design stock46:56Why the fast battleship was still a technological gambleNotable Point
- Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers & Battlecruisers of pre-WWI design stock1:05:28Derfflinger and the design triangleNotable Point
- Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers & Battlecruisers of pre-WWI design stock1:15:11Revenge-class value in the Jutland battle lineNotable Point
- Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers & Battlecruisers of pre-WWI design stock1:38:27G3 and the road to fast battleshipsChapter
- Testing out Lion Class & Potential Lion Class Successors on UAD28:46Favourite ships open two revealing design counterfactualsQ&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy31:54An F3 battlecruiser could pull older ships toward a common gunQ&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy2:15:24An Australian Queen Elizabeth would remain a common designQ&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy2:55:45A wartime construction pause delayed Britain's new capital shipsNotable Point
- Testing Out Soviet Battleship Designs...45:03A common 15-inch development path for the battle fleetNotable Point
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?27:00How 28-knot Queen Elizabeths change JutlandQ&A
- Some Myths of the Royal Navy in WWII & Treaty Years1:20:12How British construction would answer Plan ZNotable Point
- Testing out my Spanish Dreadnought Designs1:46:11A Spanish Vittorio Veneto and Mediterranean strategyQ&A
- Bruships 115: Hopefully Australia Trip in Summary!2:54:29Littorio posed a sterner test than Jutland opponentsQ&A
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)49:29British gun calibres and controlled escalationNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)51:43The more extreme Queen Elizabeth Britain could have builtNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)53:18Deterrence through usable capabilityNotable Point
- Slava Class: Comment Response25:03Why Britain built the R class and what might have followedQ&A
- HMS Warspite: Key Ships Series 3, Ship 325:32Why the Queen Elizabeth class raised the stakesChapter
- Tillman's Maximum Battleships: Key Ships Series 2, Ship 814:27The 1912 preliminary study and the 25-knot demandChapter
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells; Alternate History, Jutland if Royal Navy Shells Work extended editon52:57Why Baden cannot balance Fifth Battle SquadronNotable Point
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells; Alternate History, Jutland if Royal Navy Shells Work extended editon1:03:05Which British capital ships would receive new shells firstNotable Point
- An Imperial Navy start... this can not end well...3:30:46How R-class escorts could constrain BismarckQ&A
- Bruships 113: Jutland33:13Why Warspite could not simply replace a battlecruiserQ&A
- Bruships 113: Jutland3:00:00Why cheaper N3s misunderstand battleship costQ&A
- Building the Fleets for Jutland12:44The Royal Navy could leave 15-inch ships behindNotable Point
- Francesco Caracciolo Class Battleships: Key Ships Series 2, Ship 63:37A 28-knot challenge in the MediterraneanNotable Point
- Francesco Caracciolo Class Battleships: Key Ships Series 2, Ship 616:51How Italian speed could ripple through three fleetsChapter
- Patreon 79: AH - WW1 incidents happen that bring the US enters war on the side of Germany...2:20:20Three knots separated firepower from tactical freedomNotable Point
- Bruships 112: Julian Corbett27:24Revenge-class savings across a building programmeQ&A
- Bruships 112: Julian Corbett30:51Oil-fuelled hull efficiency and space for later upgradesQ&A
- Bruships 112: Julian Corbett32:48An oil-first Queen Elizabeth could reach 26 knotsQ&A
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done1:23:10French capital-ship responses to Queen ElizabethNotable Point
- Bruships 111: Random Books of History1:48:07A 15-inch battlecruiser changes more than the fleet listQ&A
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 32:36The missing generation between Hood and NelsonChapter
- The full quick gun calibre guide (10-18in) to Dreadnought style ships0:45The Queen Elizabeth class's 15-inch shell widthNotable Point
- Steam Battleships (1876-1891)32:43Italian sea power and Britain’s Mediterranean commitmentNotable Point
- Royal Navy retains the 'Fleet Units' of Royal Naval Air Service in 1918 - an Alternate History1:43:56Mediterranean success redistributes British capital shipsNotable Point
- Bruships 108: PLanned for Random Books off the Shelf & Chat34:13Why Warspite received the premium reconstructionQ&A
- HMS Benbow 1885: Key Ships Series 1, Ship 312:20What Benbow’s 18 inches of armour can and cannot meanChapter
- Still Trying to deal with the Inadvertently Created Super Bismarck3:26Building a super Queen Elizabeth to face an improved BismarckChapter
- Still Trying to deal with the Inadvertently Created Super Bismarck9:31What the weight budget does to a fifteen-gun battleshipNotable Point
- Still Trying to deal with the Inadvertently Created Super Bismarck19:03Fitting 4.5-inch, Bofors, and Oerlikon batteries around the main gunsNotable Point
- Still Trying to deal with the Inadvertently Created Super Bismarck23:35How one main-tower hit erases a fifteen-gun advantageNotable Point
- Still Trying to deal with the Inadvertently Created Super Bismarck29:52Rebuilding beam, topweight, and fire control after the first duelNotable Point
- Still Trying to deal with the Inadvertently Created Super Bismarck38:44Keeping the fifth turret complicates aircraft handlingNotable Point
- Still Trying to deal with the Inadvertently Created Super Bismarck1:19:49What the twelve-gun reconstruction gains from better fire controlNotable Point
- Bruships 106: Song Dynasty & Three New Books from Pen & Sword24:33Recycled turrets could turn retired battleships into new VanguardsQ&A
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?50:36Queen Elizabeth could add a fifth fifteen-inch battleshipNotable Point
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?1:11:09Postwar design ripples from a different JutlandChapter
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?1:12:46Shell testing also raises the standard for armourNotable Point
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?1:13:57The Admiral class was designed for the next commerce warChapter
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?1:16:48Completed fast battleships could force higher treaty limitsChapter
- Patreon 74: What if History - Greenboy shells had been developed and deployed in time for Jutland.1:25:25Queen Elizabeth could reinforce the Fifth Battle Squadron or become fleet flagshipNotable Point
- Bruships 105: Six Age of Sail Useful Books5:33When construction changes justify a subclassNotable Point
- Turret Selection: What in What Distribution Makes Sense for you46:57Technology choices behind the Queen Elizabeth layoutNotable Point
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas2:29Inspecting the Queen Elizabeth MaximusChapter
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas20:57Scaling speed and armour for a maximum Queen ElizabethNotable Point
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas1:32:44Giving Agincourt a Warspite-style modernizationNotable Point
- Bruships 104: Primary or Secondary Sources4:20:53Queen Elizabeth and Revenge cancellations behind the RenownsQ&A
- Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response5:14More Queen Elizabeths and the puzzle of a sixth shipQ&A
- Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response7:07What supports the claim that British designers considered American reactions?Q&A
- Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response1:02:16When oil and small-tube boilers became credible fleet choicesQ&A
- Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response1:04:49Churchill's minimum program and the four fast super-dreadnought choiceQ&A
- Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response1:10:42Coal-conversion weight, conservative machinery, and the 25-knot resultQ&A
- Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response1:18:33Caracciolo paper superiority and the missing British successorQ&A
- Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response1:22:41How to read battleship belt-armor figuresQ&A
- Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response1:33:15Why politics and unit cost produced the Revenge classQ&A
- Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response1:40:12Why a stronger Queen Elizabeth also changes her rivalsNotable Point
- Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response1:45:27Comparing Queen Elizabeth and Revenge displacement figuresQ&A
- UAD: Queen Elizabeth Maximus & Other Ideas2:00Queen Elizabeth Maximus design setupChapter
- UAD: Queen Elizabeth Maximus & Other Ideas49:48A plausible Queen Elizabeth Maximus layout and UAD's date limitsNotable Point
- UAD: Queen Elizabeth Maximus & Other Ideas1:54:42Ajax's fifteen-gun battery against an enlarged German opponentNotable Point
- Empire Total War Twitch Stream 2(February 2023)24:23Queen Elizabeth-class design alternativesNotable Point
- Bruships 103: Belfast Parts yet to arrive... so let's consider the Run up to War...1:21:36Building a ten-gun Queen Elizabeth conceptChapter
- Bruships 103: Belfast Parts yet to arrive... so let's consider the Run up to War...1:42:32New boilers could preserve a rebuilt Queen Elizabeth's speedQ&A
- Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?4:03Queen Elizabeth design questionChapter
- Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?9:27Speed bought through machinery weightNotable Point
- Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?52:58Small-tube boilers and conservative revolutionNotable Point
- Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?57:06The Queen Elizabeth Maximus counterfactualNotable Point
- Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?1:00:17Fleet numbers and the super-dreadnought labelNotable Point
- Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?1:09:15Agincourt and the 18-inch gun counterfactualNotable Point
- Patreon 73: Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?35:59Did Queen Elizabeth set the Washington treaty standard?Q&A
- Patreon 73: Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?45:52Could Revenge machinery turn Queen Elizabeth into a faster standard?Q&A
- Patreon 73: Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?56:54What would a Queen Elizabeth-derived battlecruiser look like?Q&A
- Patreon 73: Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?1:36:22How could the fast battleships be kept out of Beatty's command?Q&A
- Patreon 73: Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?1:37:28Would keeping Jellicoe at the Admiralty improve the design?Q&A
- Patreon 73: Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?1:47:15Why build Revenges instead of more Queen Elizabeths?Q&A
- Patreon 73: Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?1:49:34Was Revenge much cheaper than Queen Elizabeth?Q&A
- Patreon 73: Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?2:08:03Did parallel shipyards speed Queen Elizabeth construction?Q&A
- Patreon 73: Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?2:20:48Did Japanese designers believe Queen Elizabeth made 25 knots?Q&A
- Patreon 73: Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?2:27:02Could the oil conversion alone make 26-knot Queen Elizabeths?Q&A
- Patreon 73: Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?2:31:02Did oil firing raise top speed or sustain it?Q&A
- Bruships 102: New Books, Sea Wolves & Skagerrak3:45:23Queen Elizabeth alternatives: 28 knots and heavier gunsQ&A
- Ship Design20:13King George V and Queen Elizabeth design prioritiesNotable Point
- Patreon 72: If Jan 1939 Tsingtao incident leads to war, how does RN carrier force fair against IJN?3:26:13Which capital ships retire after the Pacific war?Q&A
- USS Wichita: Comment Response52:04Technology gaps and cost-driven follow-on warshipsNotable Point
- What if Germany didn't invade Belgium in 1914?7:20Britain's naval lead before the Belgium decisionChapter
- What if Germany didn't invade Belgium in 1914?1:09:29Tirpitz's risk fleet succeeds tactically but fails strategicallyNotable Point
- Bruships 97: Random Books, Naval Chat & Possibly the Sound of Rain37:58Thames Ironworks could not survive an Admiralty order gapQ&A
- Battle of Coronel in Retrospect1:03:48Would a German battlecruiser have saved the squadron?Q&A
- New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...26:03Triple turrets could trade one Queen Elizabeth turret for speedQ&A
- New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...1:04:22Mines and design details produced accidental survivabilityQ&A
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat40:47Why the Revenge class offered little reconstruction marginQ&A
- Bruships 95: Science Fiction, Including Paddle 'Corn Oil' (Aka BioDiesel) Battleship Twist...2:23:55How a 14-inch Dreadnought could accelerate gun escalationQ&A
- What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?19:07Capital ships and carriers join the common-gun fleetChapter
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat22:24The long Royal Navy lineage of WarspiteQ&A
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat2:05:03Different requirements favor Nelson, Queen Elizabeth, or IowaQ&A
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat2:15:03Three pieces of battleship advice for the Admiralty in 1912Q&A
- Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response38:40Could older British battleships accept the 15-inch/50?Q&A
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships24:59The fast F3 and its 15-inch/50 alternativeNotable Point
- Cressy(1899) Class: Famous for the Wrong Things - 19th Century Cruisers Series 2 Part 121:34:35The unbuilt post-Minotaur medium-cruiser questionNotable Point
- Bruships 92: New Books, Naval Chat and Late 19th Century Warships...1:14:49Why the Grand Fleet held qualitative as well as numerical superiorityQ&A
- Bruships 91: New Books & Cruiser Books3:33:24The Revenge class and the danger of cut-price capital shipsQ&A
- Bruships 88: Way of War10:25Could the Queen Elizabeths defeat Yamato together?Q&A
- Bruships 88: Way of War33:42What higher battleship-gun elevation would costQ&A
- Bruships 88: Way of War3:52:05What the KGV and Lion classes were meant to replaceQ&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 641:59:06Could Renown take triple 15-inch turrets?Q&A
- If the French Navy Fought on in 1940: Vive La France45:19Capital ships shift toward the Indian OceanChapter
- Patreon 62: What If The French Navy in 1940 Fought On?2:29:11Which heavy ships could form the Eastern Fleet?Notable Point
- Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions58:27Why the Orion class had no postwar roleQ&A
- Action of the 18th June 1799: How to Lose Frigates and Influence (Live)2:15:25Why not every Queen Elizabeth received the same rebuildQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)46:56Which older British battleships would be modernised?Q&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)55:58Unrestricted rebuilds and a faster British battle lineQ&A
- Introduction to US Cruiser Strategy in the 1920s & 1930s (Long Patrol)11:49The Florida class illustrates the scouting-force paradoxNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)14:48Why the counterfactual keeps a 16-inch gun ceilingNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)32:32How one capital-ship category encouraged fast battleshipsNotable Point
- Galaxy Class: A Naval Historian's view of Federation Cruisers & Ships of the 24th Century (Live)4:03:34What would a 15-inch/50-caliber gun have changed?Q&A
- A Historical Possibility: Triple Turret Potentiality (Battleships Lost at Jutland)13:29What triple turrets change in capital-ship layoutsQ&A
- A Historical Possibility: Triple Turret Potentiality (Battleships Lost at Jutland)57:17Triple turrets for Queen Elizabeth and R-class battleshipsChapter
- Patreon 53: Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN2:27How battleship losses at Jutland might have reshaped British designQ&A
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...43:00Why the R class aged behind the Queen ElizabethsQ&A
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...48:52The Queen Elizabeth class and claimed savingsQ&A
- Battle of Singapore Straits (Equitable Washington Treaty Scenario): A UAD Infused(Long Patrol)1:06:12Treaty ratios, Japanese insecurity and British readinessChapter
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)10:46Putting the Fifth Battle Squadron in the vanQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)1:42:06How six Vanguards could enter service before 1939Q&A
- Anglo Japanese War: If Tsingtao caused a war in January 1939 (Comment Response)25:51Could Britain keep the United States out of the war?Q&A
- The 18in Gun HMS Agincourt and UAD video comment response (Long Patrol)1:40An 18-inch Queen Elizabeth alternativeNotable Point
- The 18in Gun HMS Agincourt and UAD video comment response (Long Patrol)14:17The size and accuracy of the 18-inch experimentNotable Point
- Patreon 48: Anglo-Japanese War in Feb 39 - if Tsingtao Incident goes "hot", what's IJN doctrine?2:16:29Cunningham and the first fleet to SingaporeChapter
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion53:19Four fast battleships change British deploymentsChapter
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World1:20:16Small-tube boilers and Queen Elizabeth-class speedQ&A
- What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)14:15Quantity versus armour in the battle lineNotable Point
- What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)36:42Five ships as the conservative treaty outcomeNotable Point
- What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)41:05Why the Revenge class becomes the slow secondary lineNotable Point
- What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)41:50Modernizing the Queen Elizabeth class for a common speedNotable Point
- HMS Tiger - The Battle Cruiser Hunter: A UAD infused discussion55:30Tiger's role in a layered battle fleetChapter
- Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney (Long Patrol)1:49Why sister ships acquire different reputationsChapter
- Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney1:46:20Q&A: was Hood an enlarged Renown?Q&A
- Bruships 70: Travelling along...32:38The projected sixth Queen Elizabeth as an early fast battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 70: Travelling along...42:01How Hood adapted Queen Elizabeth's armour layoutQ&A
- Bruships 70: Travelling along...1:32:24How many modern torpedoes might sink a Queen Elizabeth-class battleshipQ&A
- Some Sunday Naval Books28:10Treaty-era modernisation of capital shipsNotable Point
- Bruships 69: The Decider2:02:02A 14-inch Dreadnought accelerates the gun-calibre ladderQ&A
- Bruships 69: The Decider2:27:51Giving every Queen Elizabeth-class battleship the Warspite treatmentQ&A
- British Industry: The More than Just Ships P1/4 - Building (Long Patrol)46:20Queen Elizabeth machinery and design-risk managementNotable Point
- Patreon 44 "More than just ships: Infrastructure - the yards that ruled the world"2:06:58Queen Elizabeth-class battleships narrowed the dock networkQ&A
- Patreon 43: "Unverified stories of Norwegian Campaign: Tall Tales of Tribals"1:58:49How Fisher might react to future battleship plans in 1913Q&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru21:00If Deutschland-class ships replaced German pre-dreadnoughtsQ&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru1:35:29The unsettled order of Britain's late-1930s capital-ship refitsQ&A
- Question Time: Answering Knight6831's Questions (Long Patrol)25:17Taranto’s result could redistribute the battle fleetNotable Point
- Bruships 65: Naval History Books & Questions Answered23:09What Canadian capital ships might have looked likeQ&A
- Bruships 65: Naval History Books & Questions Answered37:31Alaska-class ships against Queen ElizabethsQ&A
- Bruships 65: Naval History Books & Questions Answered46:44Matching a German programme of eight Bayern-class battleshipsQ&A
- A Historical Possibility: Triple Turret Potentiality (The Battle Cruiser Permutation)24:41Oil firing and the Queen Mary boiler caseChapter
- A Historical Possibility: Triple Turret Potentiality (Comment Response)4:48A twelve-gun Queen Elizabeth alternativeNotable Point
- A Historical Possibility: Triple Turret Potentiality (Comment Response)15:04Checking beam and power against historical battleshipsNotable Point
- A Historical Possibility: Triple Turret Potentiality (Comment Response)23:17What makes a fast battleship?Notable Point
- A Historical Possibility: Triple Turret Potentiality (Comment Response)28:45How a twelve-gun fast Queen Elizabeth could reset the arms raceNotable Point
- M29 Class (M33 special, Ep1/2) - Naval Fire Support of the WWI Western Front: Long Patrol Part 931:40M29 class: emergency construction and M33's survivalChapter
- Pearl Harbor: A product of the Kantai Kessen Doctrine or something to do?1:18:56Taranto and the problem of damaging too muchNotable Point
- Bruships 63: The Writing Theorists - Corbett & Mahan, Richmond & Simms, Cable & Gorshkhov2:37:58The battleship generation that was not built beside HoodQ&A
- Inspiration of Theorists: The Maritime & Strategic Lessons of the Seven Years War (1756-63)2:26:02Q&A: where four Admiral-class ships might serveQ&A
- My G3/N3 Dreadnought Battleship + Battle Cruiser = Fast Battleship Design2:53N3's 18-inch gun and the Agincourt design hypothesisNotable Point
- My G3/N3 Dreadnought Battleship + Battle Cruiser = Fast Battleship Design23:22The Queen Elizabeth class as an unrealized fast-battleship ideaNotable Point
- Bruships 60: Covid Jab, Bad Back & New Books2:47:28Could a modernised Warspite catch Bismarck?Q&A
- WW2 in the Mediterranean up until November 1940: p2 Taranto Long Patrol21:20A more decisive Taranto could have shifted forces eastNotable Point
- 21 Christmas Books for 2021 - Bruships 59: Books & Naval History Chat1:16:48An 18-inch-gun Queen Elizabeth fleetQ&A
- 21 Christmas Books for 2021 - Bruships 59: Books & Naval History Chat1:19:36An 18-inch Revenge class would favour six guns and speedQ&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…37:11What Commonwealth Queen Elizabeths would changeQ&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…51:14Queen Elizabeth class: fast battleships with strategic leverageChapter
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…1:01:27Small-tube boilers and a faster British battle lineNotable Point
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…1:06:41Why the Queen Elizabeths lacked small-tube boilersQ&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…3:15:10Warspite as the overall favourite capital shipChapter
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...33:13Commonwealth capital ships challenge treaty arithmeticQ&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...53:57Where Canadian Queen Elizabeths might fightQ&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...57:07An 18-inch Argencourt built from Queen Elizabeth logicChapter
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...59:36Extra Queen Elizabeths could reshape Cape MatapanQ&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...1:08:39Canadian battleships could reduce US reinforcement needsQ&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...1:26:53Could Canadian Queen Elizabeths push the Colorados faster?Q&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...1:34:35What might follow the 1914 British programme?Q&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...1:36:03Small-tube boilers as a fleet-wide advantageQ&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...1:38:01Why Queen Elizabeth leads the wartime comparisonQ&A
- Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)48:57How a 14-inch choice might have changed British gun developmentNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)1:01:45Queen Elizabeth versus Iowa: measuring a battleship's valueQ&A
- Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)1:17:16Queen Elizabeth speed, firepower, and production limitsNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)1:25:45Bayern versus Britain's 15-inch production advantageChapter
- Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)1:33:36What fourteen British 15-inch ships could have meant at JutlandQ&A
- Bruships 56: "Walking Softly & Carrying a Big Stick" - Admirals, Diplomacy & Detterence1:50:00Hull condition and replacement timing shaped battleship modernizationsQ&A
- Bruships 56: "Walking Softly & Carrying a Big Stick" - Admirals, Diplomacy & Detterence3:32:24Two-inch gun-calibre steps could produce a 16-inch Queen Elizabeth classQ&A
- Shipbuilding through the 1880s-1950s2:29:13Where Nelson and Rodney fit in the battle fleetQ&A
- Shipbuilding through the 1880s-1950s2:30:12How Hood's armour related to British battleshipsQ&A
- Churchill's Iniatives (WWI); Long patrol p1/4 - Navalism8:22Renown and Repulse show another design pathNotable Point
- Churchill's Iniatives (WWI); Long patrol p1/4 - Navalism9:31From the best ship to a bare-minimum follow-onNotable Point
- Churchill's Iniatives (WWI); Long patrol p1/4 - Navalism13:47The larger Queen Elizabeth counterfactualNotable Point
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions1:43:11The logistical case for a British 15-inch/45 gunQ&A
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions2:02:15The 15-inch/45 could have renewed the Queen ElizabethsQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (2)2:55:24Planned modernizations for Barham and MalayaQ&A
- Patreon 27: Some Actions of the French Navy in WWI2:04:06Were pre-dreadnoughts suitable for the Dardanelles?Q&A
- Patreon 27: Some Actions of the French Navy in WWI2:40:34What does Queen Elizabeth reveal about Bretagne's turret layout?Q&A
- Bruships 49 Special: 'Questions on ‘Battle Cruisers’ & ‘Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14)2:03:39The speculative 18-inch HMS AgincourtNotable Point
- Bruships 49 Special: 'Questions on ‘Battle Cruisers’ & ‘Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14)2:09:03The three-ship Canadian Queen Elizabeth proposalQ&A
- Bruships 49 Special: 'Questions on ‘Battle Cruisers’ & ‘Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14)2:33:46A 28-knot Queen Elizabeth with small-tube boilersQ&A
- Bruships 49 Special: 'Questions on ‘Battle Cruisers’ & ‘Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14)2:48:28The missed small-tube-boiler rebuildQ&A
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 19145:54Francesco Caracciolo and the fast battleship ideaNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 191418:20Why an 18-inch British capital ship was plausibleNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 191421:43A six-gun 18-inch capital-ship alternativeNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 19130:40HMS Tiger and the battlecruiser trade-offChapter
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 19135:14Pennsylvania's twelve-gun answerChapter
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 19137:18Bayern, Revenge, and fleet numbersChapter
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 191315:44American deterrence without escalationNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 191317:21Why matching gun power did not equal deterrenceNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 191318:03Britain's planned concentration of 15-inch battleshipsNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 191213:23Queen Elizabeth raises the calibre stakesChapter
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 191214:51Queen Elizabeth trades a fifth turret for speedNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 191224:10Reading past the two-sided naval-race storyNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 191125:41German turret choices and industrial capacityNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 190810:25Blucher's guns keep her outside the battlecruiser categoryNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): Part 4, Questions 1904-77:20Why a third Renown-class battlecruiser might modernize wellNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): Part 4, Questions 1904-79:58Dreadnought reset the type while Britain kept its industrial leadNotable Point
- Some More Battle Cruisers21:14The Borodino class edges toward fast battleshipsChapter
- Prince Philips Navy38:16How HMS Valiant became a modernized Queen Elizabeth-class battleshipChapter
- Prince Philips Navy53:37Why some Queen Elizabeth-class ships received major rebuildsQ&A
- Minotaur & Tiger Class Cruisers32:25Fitting triple turrets into existing shipsQ&A
- Four Random Books 29: Weapons of War7:53British intelligence overestimates König-class gun upgradesNotable Point
- Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects1:44:49Japanese battleships against the Queen Elizabeth classQ&A
- Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects1:54:38Do battleship fleet actions come down to a lucky hit?Q&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes29:02Could the Queen Elizabeth class carry triple 15-inch turrets?Q&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes39:55Why the last Revenge-class orders became Renown and RepulseQ&A
- Bilgepumps Taranto 80 part 3 of 3: Ripples in Musso's Pond18:40Damaged battleships change Mediterranean operationsChapter
- Bilge Pumps does Battlestar Galactica Deadlock for Navy Con 1/246:25Conning towers and the limits of command protectionNotable Point
- Patreon 6 - Force K… Malta’s mailed fist, as proposed by Ian Car27:52Why some capital ships dominate public memoryQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 18: Really Big Books, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:39:33Why Queen Elizabeth rebuilds beat replacement battleshipsQ&A
- Patreon Video 4: Tsingtao 1939 Goes Hot...2:17:46Eight British capital ships for the Pacific fleetNotable Point
- Patreon Video 4: Tsingtao 1939 Goes Hot...2:25:11Hood was not simply the next RenownQ&A
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P6b Introduction to Patreon Video 4...12:15Wartime refits and Britain's early Pacific windowNotable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5a Introduction to Patreon Video 442:40The remaining Mediterranean capital shipsNotable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P2b Introduction to Patreon Video 417:30Shifting the Mediterranean Fleet eastChapter
- Patreon Video 1: What would you put in warehouses at the end of WWI for WWII if you could?10:19The R class and Britain's fast-capital-ship alternativeNotable Point
- Patreon Video 1: What would you put in warehouses at the end of WWI for WWII if you could?49:30A longer-ranged Queen Elizabeth alternativeQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 7: Warship Design Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A56:51A Bismarck action against Renown and Queen ElizabethQ&A
- Introuduction to Refits/Taking Care of Buisness Allied Style8:15Warspite's machinery reconstruction multiplies enduranceNotable Point
- Introuduction to Refits/Taking Care of Buisness Allied Style9:19Puget Sound prepares Warspite for the Eastern FleetNotable Point
- Introuduction to Refits/Taking Care of Buisness Allied Style20:20Queen Elizabeth's reconstruction competes with wartime constructionNotable Point
- Introuduction to Refits/Taking Care of Buisness Allied Style28:12Rodney loses modernization resources to higher prioritiesNotable Point
- Introduction to Admirals, Engineers & Historians Part 133:02Philip Watts and the design of Dreadnought-era warshipsChapter
- Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy41:28Why the R class aged differently from the Queen ElizabethsQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 2b: Book Reviews/Q&A1:02Why Queen Elizabeth edges out WarspiteQ&A
- Exercises & War Gaming Rules in 192915:09The tables preserved speculative designs and an evolving destroyer roleNotable Point
- Aircraft Carriers the Debate - Dr Alex Clarke vs Armoured Carrier's Jamie1:15:32How British carriers operated in wartimeQ&A