Video
UAD: Queen Elizabeth Maximus & Other Ideas
Study UAD: Queen Elizabeth Maximus & Other Ideas, a Dr. Alex Clarke video from 21 Feb 2023, with 24 time notes. Topics include Alternate History, Austro-Hungarian Navy, Battleships.
Time notes
- 2:00Queen Elizabeth Maximus design setupChapter
A heavier Queen Elizabeth counterfactual exposes the compromises involved in representing unbuilt ships with UAD's available guns and hull components.
- 12:03Austro-Hungarian response to a heavier Queen ElizabethNotable Point
An Austro-Hungarian opponent design shows how gun caliber, triple turrets, armor, and oil firing shape a plausible capital-ship reply.
- 20:11Elswick gun orders and hidden calibersNotable Point
A suspected 18-inch gun program raises an archival problem: special-order labels may conceal the real caliber, and their meaning still needs establishing.
- 23:21Long-range ranging, gun caliber, and engagement controlNotable Point
The simulated duel connects distant silhouettes and ranging with the British designs' larger broadside and ability to control engagement distance.
- 40:18Circling a disabled battleship and keeping guns trainedNotable Point
A nearly stopped opponent shows how circling changes the turret movement each side needs to keep firing.
- 41:55UAD as a historian's quick design testNotable Point
UAD supplies a quick visual model and design parameters for further simulation runs in a Harpoon-based system.
- 44:34Choosing countries and representative ships for a later-era Total WarNotable Point
A possible later-era Total War raises choices about world-map scope, playable countries, and distinctive historical warships.
- 49:48A plausible Queen Elizabeth Maximus layout and UAD's date limitsNotable Point
The playful turret arrangement is separated from the historically likelier Royal Navy layout, and the game's later design year is explained.
- 54:58Structural integrity, flotation, and the damage modelNotable Point
An Austro-Hungarian battleship that remains afloat after nearly all structural integrity is gone exposes a key limitation in UAD's survivability model.
- 1:00:35King George V alternative without Chatfield's choiceChapter
A King George V alternative exceeds its displacement allowance, and the game's high-speed range figure complicates comparisons with historical endurance.
- 1:07:31Armor weight and compact turret placementNotable Point
Reduced armor weight and closer main-turret spacing help fit a 16-inch King George V alternative within its displacement allowance.
- 1:13:51Choosing secondaries for the King George V alternativeNotable Point
British 4.5-inch and 5.25-inch guns fit the game's options poorly, prompting a proposed six-inch dual-purpose alternative.
- 1:15:24German battleship design and Kiel Canal constraintsNotable Point
Kiel Canal access and German gun-layout preferences guide repairs to an implausible automatically generated battleship.
- 1:25:12Quadruple 18-inch Armageddon designNotable Point
Quadruple 18-inch turrets leave difficult choices over machinery, tower weight, spotting performance, and secondary armament.
- 1:38:05Goliath heavy-gun layout tradeoffsNotable Point
An extreme heavy-gun design shows why turret placement, engine efficiency, secondaries, and weight savings matter even in a deliberately exaggerated battleship.
- 1:54:42Ajax's fifteen-gun battery against an enlarged German opponentNotable Point
A 28-knot Queen Elizabeth counterfactual faces twelve German 15-inch guns in a deliberately artificial single-ship test.
- 1:56:45Funnel smoke deflectors and visibilityNotable Point
Funnel plates guide airflow upward to keep smoke away from guns, using the same principle as smoke deflectors on steam locomotives.
- 1:58:07Broadside volume and the case for more 14-inch gunsNotable Point
The fifteen-gun test ship prompts a focused argument about salvo volume, hit probability, and what a much larger 14-inch broadside might have achieved.
- 2:03:55Speed, armor, and staying outside secondary rangeNotable Point
Ajax uses speed to balance gun performance against protection while keeping the opponent's seven-inch battery out of range.
- 2:09:06QuestionWhat was the most common way for a warship to signal surrender in this era?AnswerQ&A
Lower the ship's flags and hoist white flags, although those signals could be difficult to see at long range.
- 2:10:47How might the United States answer Queen Elizabeth Maximus?Notable Point
A hypothetical American response to Queen Elizabeth Maximus would retain planned 14-inch ships while pursuing an 18-inch successor, though that reaction remains uncertain.
- 2:11:42Giving the German opponent fifteen main gunsNotable Point
A revised German battery tests whether Ajax's earlier advantage depended on having more main guns.
- 2:22:57Engine damage brings Ajax within seven-inch gun rangeNotable Point
Losing speed exposes Ajax to rapid secondary fire that damages structure and reduces fighting efficiency.
- 2:30:16Destroyer smoke and the unresolved cause of Ajax's close engagementNotable Point
Ajax needs screening support to disengage, while a final settings check overturns the initial suspicion that the battle started too close.