Naval Historywith Dr. Alex

Q&A · 41:28-43:13

Why the R class aged differently from the Queen Elizabeths

The R-class battleships remained useful but were less practical reconstruction candidates and had originally been scheduled for replacement after about twenty years.

Interwar Naval PolicyQueen Elizabeth Class BattleshipsRevenge Class BattleshipsRoyal NavyWarship Reconstruction
Watch at this timeFull video guide
Question

Were the R-class battleships already obsolete and useless by the Second World War?

Short answer

No; they remained tough and well armed, but their structure made deep modernization less practical than it was for the Queen Elizabeth class.

Notes

The Revenge-class ships were old and slow, yet they retained real military value. Pre-treaty planning would have retired Royal Sovereign, Revenge, Resolution, and Royal Oak between 1936 and 1938, reflecting an expected service life of roughly twenty years. Treaty limits extended their careers, while their guns and toughness kept them useful. The older Queen Elizabeth class adapted better to major reconstruction, which helps explain its stronger Second World War performance. A deep R-class rebuild was technically possible, but the fleet expected new King George V and Lion-class ships to replace them instead.