Related time notes
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?46:34Could extra time help the longer 15-inch gun?Notable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?32:35Failed negotiations leave ships as bargaining countersChapter
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?34:36New capital ships accelerate retirement of older vesselsNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?36:55Successor construction and pressure for 18-inch gunsNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?38:41Armour and subdivision in fast battleships and battlecruisersNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?43:53A new carrier based on the G3 hull formNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?1:05:59What follows G3, N3 and No. 13?Notable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?1:19:30Replacement arithmetic leaves little room for older battleshipsNotable Point
- Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:41:25How a naval treaty delayed until 1927 could change fleet limitsQ&A
- Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:03:13Does possessing the most powerful warship stop mattering?Q&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live27:09Preferred unbuilt battleships and battlecruisersQ&A
- What happens if WWII took place as scheduled... after 1942? (Patreon)1:52:22Tiger's design lineage leads toward the G3Q&A
- What happens if WWII took place as scheduled... after 1942? (Patreon)2:10:48Would Britain revive G3 or N3 directly?Q&A
- What happens if instead of Gallipoli, Fisher gets Churchill to go for the Baltic? (Patreon)2:40:41Why not build 25-knot fast battleships from the start?Q&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...42:45Treaty battlecruisers grow into fast battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:02:09Existing orders at the Washington Naval TreatyQ&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...12:29G3 guns and completion dates in a no-treaty scenarioQ&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...13:00Four capital ships a year and the economics of continuous constructionNotable Point
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...36:19Why Royal Navy constructors bet on G3 speedQ&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...54:24G3 appearance and a possible F3-style turret layoutQ&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:27:22G3 battlecruisers as visible instruments of presenceQ&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:31:25How battlecruisers and smaller warships divide naval workNotable Point
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:55:29Would three very different warships merit Adam Duncan's name?Q&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:12:21A possible G3 battlecruiser anti-aircraft outfitQ&A
- What if HMS Hermes was the first of a class of Cruiser Carriers?7:22Large carrier conversions expose the cost of using scarce tonnageNotable Point
- Bruships 242: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:16:07Hood's armor changes and the risk of cancellationQ&A
- Bruships 242: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:44:22G3, N3, and the limits of gun-calibre classificationsQ&A
- Five Topics which tend to lead to me debating vigorously with other historians... (Patreon Live)1:30:27Capital ships as a moving spectrumNotable Point
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)1:38:12G3 and N3 armament without the treaty settlementNotable Point
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)2:04:50Continuous construction replaces older capital shipsNotable Point
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:07:44Why an N3 follow-on would not simply add twelve 16.5-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 234: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:42:36The Royal Navy's most consequential unbuilt designsQ&A
- Bruships 234: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:43:33F3, longer 15-inch guns and the political appeal of 16-inch gunsNotable Point
- Bruships 234: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:45:51Cancelled classes that would have changed later fleetsQ&A
- Bruships 234: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:49:19How four Admirals could change the purpose of G3Notable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?33:13G3 conversions anchor a five-carrier strike forceChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?37:32A separate proposal for five declared 27,000-ton carriersNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 17: Missiles, Guns & Other Barrels of Fun27:24G3 battlecruisers with 16.5-inch guns before the Washington TreatyNotable Point
- Trumps Battleship; A Naval History view on what we know of the Defiant Class so far13:01Why machinery changes the battleship and battlecruiser spectrumNotable Point
- Bruships 224: Alternate Naval History Questions Answered Live...42:32British debt and naval spending after World War INotable Point
- Bruships 223: Naval History & Science Fiction Questions Answered Live...3:41:35Duncan as a battlecruiser's nameQ&A
- Bruships 223: Naval History & Science Fiction Questions Answered Live...3:52:00Choosing a battlecruiser's gun caliberQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 13: Questions on Battleships1:42Why G3 and Iowa belong in different categoriesQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 13: Questions on Battleships2:31Why dock limits could change a battlecruiser's gunsNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 13: Questions on Battleships20:31Why the Admiral class could not simply become fast battleshipsNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon1:18Why the G3 design adopted a transom sternQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust22:20Why battlecruisers and battleships favored different gun weightsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida6:53:08A Dutch G3 battlecruiser before the Washington conferenceQ&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:37:38Four carrier conversions under a looser treatyQ&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:41:09Admiral or G3 hulls for carrier conversion?Q&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:05:20Amagi survives the earthquake as a battlecruiserQ&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:36:31A 1939 Royal Navy built from G3s and N3sQ&A
- Bruships 217: Back from Japan 2025: Jetlag is a Myth - Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:54:25Carrier choices after losing the Courageous classQ&A
- Bruships 214 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:05:29Three modern books for Admiral FisherQ&A
- What if the High Seas Fleet was not Scuttled in Scapa Flow?48:12German technology sparks a naval construction boomChapter
- What if the High Seas Fleet was not Scuttled in Scapa Flow?1:06:25G3s, N3s, and Lexingtons before a delayed treatyChapter
- #2Historians Live: With @Drachinifel comes to chat & build UAD Dreadnoughts that Almost were P36:20A Royal Navy answer to Japan's Number 13 classChapter
- #2Historians Live: With @Drachinifel comes to chat & build UAD Dreadnoughts that Almost were P325:35An antiaircraft secondary battery for the Number 13 responseNotable Point
- #2Historians Live: With @Drachinifel comes to chat & build UAD Dreadnoughts that Almost were P33:21:36Was the development of modern naval warfare set in stone?Q&A
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?36:48G3 and N3 as a warning against another naval raceNotable Point
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?37:58Lexington prompted new docks while British designs had to fit existing basesNotable Point
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:48:46A Dutch G3 battlecruiser enters service in 1939Q&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:16:41Admiral-class ships with 16.5-inch gunsQ&A
- Sir Eustace Tennyson d'Eyncourt: WWI Royal Navy's Director of Naval Construction52:12G3 and N3 designs fit imperial dockyards and treaty expectationsChapter
- Sir Eustace Tennyson d'Eyncourt: WWI Royal Navy's Director of Naval Construction55:19Fully armoured battlecruisers for imperial strategic mobilityNotable Point
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?1:40:08Why the Kii class fell short of a balanced fast battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:37:15Historical battleship hulls for a modern capital shipQ&A
- Bruships 204: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:45:44A 15-inch gun limit at the Washington Naval ConferenceQ&A
- Bruships 204: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:20:00Why the British battlecruiser game line changes character at G3Q&A
- Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:27:16The 16-inch shells adapted into Pearl Harbor bombsQ&A
- Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:02:52Battlecruiser choices for British and Canadian fleetsQ&A
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:49:25Designing the Royal Navy and US Navy without naval treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:53:52Continuing British battleship and battlecruiser constructionNotable Point
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:04:38Replacing the Clemson swarm and raising battleship speedNotable Point
- Bruships 191: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:09:49Turning pristine G3 battlecruisers into modern task-group leadersQ&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:11:06A British 5.5-inch dual-purpose gun pathNotable Point
- Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...16:33F3 versus G3 for Royal Navy serviceQ&A
- Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...20:57Why F3's dockyard and ammunition needs matter against G3Q&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:29:44G3 hulls as Washington Treaty aircraft carriersQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...59:03Comparing Hermes-style G3 and Eagle-style Admiral conversionsQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:43:01Limits of the N3-Yamato and G3-Iowa analogyQ&A
- Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...Part II54:12K3 battlecruiser: a faster and heavier alternative to G3Q&A
- Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...Part II1:02:49British capital ships with two forward turrets and one amidshipsQ&A
- Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...1:34:20Choosing a fictional warship to send to 1939Q&A
- Bruships 178: Naval History or Exercise2:03:50How a G3-based Royal Navy carrier might have lookedQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?33:41Why the fully armored battlecruiser remained a British ideaQ&A
- Battle of Elli(1912): When Regional Powers Go to War51:27All-forward guns can invert the logic of crossing the TNotable Point
- Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 20244:52:36How the faster A2 version of HMS Tiger might survive the London Naval TreatyQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?1:48:18Why G3 carrier conversions would be conversions in name onlyQ&A
- Just 10 Days of Submarine Sinkings34:43Modernization can move a ship without erasing its lineageNotable Point
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/43:44:28Four Queen Elizabeths for each Dominion and the treaty balanceQ&A
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/43:49:28How Dominion battleships could drive an escalating design raceNotable Point
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/46:29:54Propellant chemistry, magazine heat, and G3 layoutQ&A
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/47:24:50Nelson and Rodney as the pinnacle of the traditional dreadnoughtQ&A
- World of Warships Colab 1, Questions & U Class subs: Second 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 2/44:25:31What G3 magazine separation reveals about shell consistencyNotable Point
- The Battlecruiser/Fast Battleship Differential & Soviet Carriers: Scuttlebutt 714:43What separates a battlecruiser from a fast battleshipQ&A
- The Battlecruiser/Fast Battleship Differential & Soviet Carriers: Scuttlebutt 718:38Cruiser-line speed sets the fast-battleship thresholdNotable Point
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!2:28:59If the G3 battlecruisers reached serviceQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!3:49:32Why an 18-inch battery breaks the G3 designQ&A
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat1:47:49Using chronology to test claims about naval-gun developmentNotable Point
- Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!47:48A delayed Washington treaty could leave G3s afloatQ&A
- Bruships 160: Money for Kallax, Book Space ain’t Free! Naval History Questions & Chat...2:39:31Likely names for the G3 and N3 capital shipsQ&A
- Check Campaign 24: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:53:38G3 and N3 gun lineage and the fast-battleship turnNotable Point
- Fisher's Furious Flying off Ships: Courageous Class built as Aircraft Carriers1:21:05Admiral-class hulls favor hangars, islands, and perhaps deck-edge liftsNotable Point
- Bruships Gothenborg style...13:35Why the G3 battlecruiser was tied to a 16.5-inch gunQ&A
- Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign21:24G3-style battlecruiser design choicesNotable Point
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?4:04:01American 16- and 18-inch guns before WashingtonQ&A
- What would the economic impact have been if the Naval Treaties hadn't happened? Patreon Premier 128:10Iowa's gun-weight dispute and the battleship spectrumNotable Point
- Bruships 154: Ship-Shape's Scandi Ship 2024... answering naval history questions...4:05:41Reloading limits in a hypothetical 20-inch-gun battleshipNotable Point
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!3:48:16Hood as a post-Jutland adaptationQ&A
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!4:12:13Admiral and G3 hulls as aircraft carriersNotable Point
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote1:18:08Rate of fire versus an 18-inch shellQ&A
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote1:33:48Replacing battlecruisers in a no-treaty fleetQ&A
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote1:42:28The fiscal case that Britain could afford the G3sNotable Point
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote2:14:49Why N3 and G3 would change later superstructuresQ&A
- Patreon 103: The Nightmare returns - 4 WWI Town class are discovered by the Royal Navy in 19383:21:42G3 or N3: the greater threat to the US NavyQ&A
- Patreon 103: The Nightmare returns - 4 WWI Town class are discovered by the Royal Navy in 19383:22:42G3 belt and deck armor figuresQ&A
- Patreon 103: The Nightmare returns - 4 WWI Town class are discovered by the Royal Navy in 19383:23:38Disputed accounts of G3's intended gunsNotable Point
- Patreon 103: The Nightmare returns - 4 WWI Town class are discovered by the Royal Navy in 19383:52:53G3 turret rings and competing gun interpretationsNotable Point
- Check Campaign 16: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:11:07British gun calibre choices and nine-gun salvosQ&A
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off22:54Converting a G3 into an aircraft carrierQ&A
- Check Campaign 15: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign42:09Dock size limits G3 and N3 designsQ&A
- Check Campaign 15: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign43:00Royal Navy infrastructure cycles and wartime delayNotable Point
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends2:57How the G3 and N3 designs influenced later battleshipsQ&A
- What the post WWI Navys really wanted from Aircraft Carriers: Hermes, Hōshō & Langley!1:08:34Naval races contribute to war scares but do not cause wars aloneNotable Point
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:55:17British 16.5-inch guns and the Washington treatyQ&A
- Bruships 148: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Begins2:07:11The case for a 16.5-inch battleship gunNotable Point
- Patreon 102: Zeroes over the Med! Japan joins the Britain & Free powers on 25th of June 1940...3:16:23Would Vanguard still be built after N3 and G3?Q&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed3:54Why G3 and N3 break later battleship predictionsQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed3:38:05Why the G3 programme did not preclude cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed3:43:54How pre-G3 studies could shape later capital shipsQ&A
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed4:26:03Why a supergun race would reverse toward smaller weaponsQ&A
- Patreon 101: If Lord Fisher died in Jan 1914, how does Prince Louis of Battenberg perform as 1SL?2:55:20Why a fifth turret complicates a fast battleshipNotable Point
- Patreon 101: If Lord Fisher died in Jan 1914, how does Prince Louis of Battenberg perform as 1SL?3:12:09What follows if the N3 and G3 designs are built?Q&A
- Check Campaign 11: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:17:20Why bigger battleship guns were not automatically betterQ&A
- Bruships 145: Naval History Questions Answered & Will it be lego building or book boxing?1:46:57What 'twenty years ahead' misses about the G3 and N3 designsQ&A
- Bruships 144: Some Books(Can't Find Lego Cam Sorry) & Naval History Questions3:04:05How G3 battlecruisers reshape the German surface warQ&A
- The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!1:10:33Why Britain might return to the 15-inch gunNotable Point
- The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!1:11:00Did Nelson and Rodney use the G3 battlecruiser's gun?Q&A
- The Royal Navy's Forgotten Lost Battleship Generation: Key Ship Series 8 - Ships 60:00The treaty uncertainty behind a forgotten battleship generationChapter
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered51:23A G3 carrier conversion would resemble a British LexingtonQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered1:12:10Four G3 battlecruisers would likely take admiral namesQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered2:05:03A G3 carrier could operate roughly 96 aircraftQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered3:13:32G3s serve future needs rather than replace old ships one for oneQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered3:30:32Conventional wartime battlecruisers shift the carrier candidatesQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered4:25:44Large dockyards and G3 carriers accelerate British naval aviationQ&A
- Imperial Russia Survives WWI: A Patreon Requested Alternate History47:11G3 construction raises the treaty ceilingChapter
- Imperial Russia Survives WWI: A Patreon Requested Alternate History57:09N3 and Caracciolo ships transform the building raceNotable Point
- The Last Invasion of Britain: Battle of Fishguard(1797)2:55:48Britain would need a faster, heavier answer to Tillman IIINotable Point
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!28:09Why a 24.5-inch torpedo remained too heavy for destroyersQ&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!2:19:08When British battleships and battlecruisers might convergeQ&A
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty54:04Rewriting the capital-ship limitsChapter
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty58:18A treaty ceiling redirects British gun developmentNotable Point
- Patreon 98: The World Spins on a Coin: The February Revolution Fails & Imperial Russia survives WWI1:28:04A treaty based on ship size rather than fleet totalsQ&A
- Patreon 98: The World Spins on a Coin: The February Revolution Fails & Imperial Russia survives WWI1:38:01Why the battleship race jumps to 18-inch gunsNotable Point
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered13:49Could British G3 and N3 studies have influenced Japanese battleships?Q&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered1:00:36Why Hood remained a battlecruiserQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered1:23:54A refitted G3 against BismarckQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered2:20:16How G3 and N3 would raise German battleship calibersQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered3:37:07Why the G3 and N3 programs were credibleQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered3:56:22G3 and N3 as the next step in a qualitative arms raceNotable Point
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!1:20:13How an F3 layout could produce a faster NelsonQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!3:06:21Why G3 and N3 were not the Royal Navy's whole building planQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!3:32:48Britain's enormous post-World War One shipbuilding advantageQ&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered1:14:58Trading triple turrets for larger twin-gun mountingsQ&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered1:41:51Why the G3 and N3 ships were likely admiral namesQ&A
- HMS Unicorn: Honestly Not An Aircraft Carrier - Key Ship Series 8, Ship 10:00Naval treaties created opportunities as well as constraintsChapter
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time20:32A delayed Washington treaty opens the way to 9.2-inch cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time55:35Treaty carrier conversions depended on how much hull already existedQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time56:51G3 and N3 construction makes dockyard expansion a 1920s priorityQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time2:17:33Transatlantic shipbuilding networks made G3 secrecy porousQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time2:48:13G3s belong forward; N3s anchor the Mediterranean or Home FleetQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time3:45:17Postwar yard competition made G3 and N3 hulls unusually affordableQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time3:50:07Lexington, Hood, and G3 answer different battlecruiser problemsQ&A
- Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō12:16The treaty loophole behind small carriersChapter
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books5:57How faster N3 and G3 designs change treaty bargainingQ&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books53:59What a surviving G3 could do in the Cold War BalticQ&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books1:19:35What Britain converts if the Courageous class stays armedQ&A
- Patreon 93: Old crocks at war. How useful to WWI were the old ships brought out of reserve?2:03:57G3 and N3 construction could feed a rotating capital-ship reserveNotable Point
- Patreon 93: Old crocks at war. How useful to WWI were the old ships brought out of reserve?2:07:11Would G3 and N3 immediately push the R class into reserve?Q&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:14:04Whether the G3 battlecruisers were laid downQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:30:30Could Britain have built the G3 battlecruisers?Q&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:30:38Why Lion would not simply repeat G3Q&A
- Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:03:18How G3 and N3 ideas might merge without WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...27:24The G3 and N3 program already implied retirement of Britain's older capital shipsQ&A
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...42:10Chatfield's preferences pulled King George V away from a direct G3 updateQ&A
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...54:18G3 and N3 promise brilliance or fundamental flaws, not certaintyQ&A
- Naval Historian Reacts to Aircraft Carriers the Debate Part 2 of 23:22Capital-ship naming and the N3 battleshipsNotable Point
- Tillman Class: Dreams of Super Battleships - KSS2 S8 Comment Response12:31How Britain might answer a 30-knot Tillman IIIQ&A
- Francesco Caracciolo: The Almost Next Battleship Era - KSS2 S6 Comment Response1:34Four Caracciolos could reshape the treaty-era building raceNotable Point
- Francesco Caracciolo: The Almost Next Battleship Era - KSS2 S6 Comment Response12:52British industrial responses to a completed Caracciolo classNotable Point
- The Amagi Class: Super Kongos or Nascent Fast Battleships? - KSS2 S5 Comment Response10:46Why Amagi would not simply replace the Royal Navy's N3 programQ&A
- The Amagi Class: Super Kongos or Nascent Fast Battleships? - KSS2 S5 Comment Response11:14How G3, N3, and Amagi construction schedules would overlapNotable Point
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out28:22Shrinking L3 and K3 ideas into a treaty battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out41:23G3 and Lexington were designed for different fleet jobsNotable Point
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out1:08:25H3A speed versus G3 firepowerQ&A
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out1:31:06A G3-sized carrier could handle twin-engine aircraftQ&A
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out1:46:21A 16.5-inch treaty limit could carry G3 gun work into the Lion classQ&A
- Lexington Class: America's Battle Cruiser Dreams - KSS2 S4 Comment Response13:13Why the G3 design suited an Eastern Fleet missionNotable Point
- Lexington Class: America's Battle Cruiser Dreams - KSS2 S4 Comment Response25:21Why G3's paper turret layout might have changed in the yardNotable Point
- Lexington Class: America's Battle Cruiser Dreams - KSS2 S4 Comment Response29:51What a no-treaty battlecruiser generation might have becomeQ&A
- Lexington Class: America's Battle Cruiser Dreams - KSS2 S4 Comment Response35:21Why the G3 saint-name story fails a source checkChapter
- Lexington Class: America's Battle Cruiser Dreams - KSS2 S4 Comment Response52:29Lexington and G3 answered different fleet problemsChapter
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response0:17Why the G3 remained a battlecruiserQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response17:31G3 forward basing and an Eastern Fleet coreNotable Point
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response20:36Likely names for the G3 classQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response36:15The all-forward battery still left room for antiaircraft gunsQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response36:52The G3-N3 program and British financesQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response38:46A wartime G3 would carry stronger antiaircraft defensesQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response46:33Lexington, Amagi, and G3 design rolesNotable Point
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response48:04G3s could set a 16.5-inch treaty limitNotable Point
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response1:06:32All-forward guns traded stern fire for tactical controlQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response1:08:42Larger treaty ships widen Germany's industrial gapNotable Point
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response1:12:32Why G3 and Iowa look similar on paperQ&A
- British Response to Graf Zeppelin: KSS2 S1 Comment Response27:29G3 and N3 designs posed a fleet-distribution dilemmaQ&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy1:23:38Interwar exercises tested fast capital-ship rolesChapter
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy1:28:19Why G3's armor did not automatically make it a fast battleshipNotable Point
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy1:34:49Could the F3 have been the first fast battleship?Notable Point
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy1:48:24Admiral carrier conversions and an early G3Chapter
- HMVS Cerberus: KSS1 S4 Comment Response11:40Completed G3 and N3 ships reshape treaty bargainingNotable Point
- HMVS Cerberus: KSS1 S4 Comment Response14:33Would a G3 share Hood's fatal vulnerability?Q&A
- SMS Seydlitz - The Pivotol 4th German Battlecruiser - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 910:44How endurance and armor shaped the fast-battleship transitionChapter
- Bruships 130: Battleships15:04Capital ships without the Washington Naval TreatyQ&A
- HMS Dreadnought: Key Ship Series 1 Ship 1 Comment Response17:47Why Hood and G3 remained battlecruisersQ&A
- Bruships 129: Travels, Rememberance & Questions from Chat23:40If Japanese delegates exposed US eavesdroppingQ&A
- Bruships 129: Travels, Rememberance & Questions from Chat28:45Why G3 and N3 successors remained undefinedQ&A
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare1:16:51Why using war debt against the G3 and N3 programs could backfireQ&A
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare1:20:40How debt coercion could delay the naval treatiesNotable Point
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...38:55G3 and N3 at opposite ends of the capital-ship spectrumChapter
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...45:35Hood, G3, and the meaning of battlecruiserNotable Point
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...53:03The uncertain names of the G3 and N3 classesNotable Point
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...1:04:02Why Britain's post-G3 plans remain uncertainNotable Point
- Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series2:48:08Norman Friedman's books would push Fisher toward faster, superfiring shipsQ&A
- Patreon 86: Jutland with Competent British Battlecruiser Fleet Commander - Sturdee replaces Beatty2:41:44Why not keep 15-inch guns?Q&A
- Bruships 124: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series4:00:44G3 turret layout and the problem with wing turretsQ&A
- Bruships 122: Patreon Special - how wooden ships between 1700 to 1860 are built13:47Which cancelled battlecruisers mattered most?Q&A
- Bruships 122: Patreon Special - how wooden ships between 1700 to 1860 are built2:25:54Adapting the G3 to a 45,000-ton treaty limitQ&A
- Bruships 122: Patreon Special - how wooden ships between 1700 to 1860 are built2:41:04What K3 would need to reach G3 speedQ&A
- Bruships 122: Patreon Special - how wooden ships between 1700 to 1860 are built2:51:01Turning hotel-room surveillance into treaty leverageQ&A
- Battleships of the Treaty Era26:36What the treaty stopped each navy buildingChapter
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!1:57:50What happens if Britain hides over-limit G3sQ&A
- HMS Incomparable: When Jackie Fisher Dreamed to Big - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 819:58Incomparable versus G3: calibre against volume of fireChapter
- HMS Incomparable: When Jackie Fisher Dreamed to Big - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 826:35Fire-control redundancy and the speed of engagementNotable Point
- HMS Incomparable: When Jackie Fisher Dreamed to Big - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 830:54N3 mobile citadel and G3 task-force shipChapter
- HMS Incomparable: When Jackie Fisher Dreamed to Big - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 844:04Three counterfactual tests for Fisher and treaty-era warshipsNotable Point
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer1:13:07Completed Admirals could transform the Washington settlementNotable Point
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer3:18:38Deck armour, belt armour, and the protected citadelChapter
- Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture4:05:13K3 as a suggested successor to N3 and G3Q&A
- Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers & Battlecruisers of pre-WWI design stock1:38:27G3 and the road to fast battleshipsChapter
- Montana Class, The Bulwarks for the New Battle Line: Key Ship Series 4, Part 245:13What a Montana-Yamato duel cannot showNotable Point
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy2:07:55Dockyard size would shape the successor to the G3Q&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy2:30:47Why a delayed Washington treaty could raise the stakesQ&A
- Testing Out Soviet Battleship Designs...26:47Why a British G3 hull fits the Soviet conceptNotable Point
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?32:34How a treaty-free imperial battlecruiser programme might developQ&A
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?3:09:13Why four G3s and four N3s were only Britain's opening moveQ&A
- Patreon 80: The most annoying & damaging 'myths' about the Royal Navy in the Treaty Years & WWII?1:04:52Could Britain have chosen two G3s instead of Nelson and Rodney?Q&A
- Some Books Aquired So Far in #NavHistAus23! Sydney5:53Why G3 experience would not reshape the first N3sQ&A
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells; Alternate History, Jutland if Royal Navy Shells Work extended editon1:21:19Better shell tests also drive better armourNotable Point
- Bruships 114: Alternate Histories, What Ifs & Questions from Chat2:25:32Why Tiger could remain useful beside the G3sQ&A
- A 13.5in gun Dreadnought? Would it work?54:12Reworking G3 and F3 capital-ship ideasChapter
- Bruships 113: Jutland12:52Why G3s and N3s were unlikely to be saint-namedQ&A
- Bruships 113: Jutland14:30Why a much larger British fleet changes the Washington premiseQ&A
- Bruships 113: Jutland58:04How close the G3s came to receiving namesQ&A
- Bruships 113: Jutland3:00:00Why cheaper N3s misunderstand battleship costQ&A
- Patreon 79: AH - WW1 incidents happen that bring the US enters war on the side of Germany...2:58:28Neutrality also rewrites Versailles and the naval raceQ&A
- Patreon 79: AH - WW1 incidents happen that bring the US enters war on the side of Germany...3:04:21France had no ready answer to G3 and N3Q&A
- Building a NelRod County Class...44:51A 9.2-inch Hawkins-class alternativeChapter
- Building a NelRod County Class...1:59:39Scaling the forward-gun idea into an 18-inch battleshipChapter
- We Beat The Daisy... Ship Naming0:01Why the G3 battlecruisers were more likely to be Admirals than SaintsNotable Point
- Saint Names for G3s & N3s0:22The contested Saint-class labelChapter
- Saint Names for G3s & N3s1:21Saint George and Saint David do not form a class listNotable Point
- Saint Names for G3s & N3s3:03Why admiral names fit the G3 and N3 lineageChapter
- Saint Names for G3s & N3s4:50Ship names as Royal Navy strategic messagingNotable Point
- Saint Names for G3s & N3s8:06How a naming story can harden into factNotable Point
- Saint Names for G3s & N3s13:25What evidence would settle the Saint-name questionNotable Point
- Amagi Class Battlecruiser: Key Ship Series 2, Ship 535:50Britain's no-treaty capital-ship responseNotable Point
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done6:26K3 armour and speed trade-offsNotable Point
- Bruships 111: Random Books of History1:50:05N3 and G3 cancellation as a treaty decisionQ&A
- Bruships 111: Random Books of History2:11:18Where N3 and G3 capital ships would deployQ&A
- Bruships 111: Random Books of History2:45:38Lexington and G3 were built around different missionsNotable Point
- Bruships 111: Random Books of History3:05:11G3 and N3: pursuit versus overwhelming forceQ&A
- Lexington Class Battle Cruisers: Key Ship Series 2, Ship 425:34The capital ships that might have followed LexingtonChapter
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 32:36The missing generation between Hood and NelsonChapter
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 35:13Infrastructure, not aesthetics, drove the compact layoutChapter
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 36:34Machinery heat, magazines, and evolving fire controlNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 38:24Wartime experience returns to the design officesNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 310:24Why G3 and N3 would disrupt rival battlefleetsNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 311:28G3 speed, range, and uncertain performance marginsNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 313:20G3 as concentrated capability, not one breakthroughChapter
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 315:06An alternate G3 layout for balance and maintenanceNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 317:43All-forward guns for manoeuvring ship actionsNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 318:37Internal separation made maintenance and resilience easierNotable Point
- Empire Total War Twitch Stream 9(April 2023)44:25How completed G3 and N3 ships could reshape treaty limitsChapter
- Bruships 106: Song Dynasty & Three New Books from Pen & Sword35:44An eight-ship battlecruiser force implies a rolling replacement cycleQ&A
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?1:12:46Shell testing also raises the standard for armourNotable Point
- Naval Arms & Armour Research in prior to WWI22:52Realistic shell trials reshaped post-Jutland capital shipsChapter
- A potential American Response to the 18in HMS Agincourt?2:32:47Testing twelve 18-inch guns on an N3/G3-derived hullChapter
- Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response1:38:29What Furious reveals about the origin of the 18-inch gunQ&A
- Admirals, Lexingtons & Tosa; What if the Washington Naval Treaty built them?27:18The revised fleet lists let every navy claim a victoryNotable Point
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat1:00:31Why G3 and N3 responses could not begin immediatelyQ&A
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat1:06:38Paper battleships were not ready answers to the G3 and N3Notable Point
- Bruships 95: Science Fiction, Including Paddle 'Corn Oil' (Aka BioDiesel) Battleship Twist...1:08:23An interwar naval race would reward quality over numbersQ&A
- Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response20:28G3's battlecruiser label and disputed block coefficientQ&A
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships1:51Why Jutland did not end the battlecruiserChapter
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships8:20Hood, G3, and N3 as a global deterrent systemNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships13:57Watership Down explains the G3 deterrentNotable Point
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships18:39The Washington Treaty squeezes Britain's battle lineChapter
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?38:39Would Britain keep building battlecruisers without the Washington Treaty?Q&A
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?45:18The dockyards and basing logic behind a global G3 forceChapter
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?1:00:09How G3 and N3 divided their machinery spacesNotable Point
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?1:02:28What would Yamato look like in a world with G3 and N3?Q&A
- Bruships 91: New Books & Cruiser Books26:22A 40,000-ton treaty successor to G3 and N3Q&A
- Bruships 91: New Books & Cruiser Books3:51:03Why battlecruiser classification depends on its contemporariesNotable Point
- Bruships 91: New Books & Cruiser Books4:34:56How a longer First World War might produce Admirals, G3s, and N3sQ&A
- Bruships 90: Books From the Road1:39:41A no-treaty G3 follow-on combines eighteen-inch guns, speed, and protectionQ&A
- Bruships 90: Books From the Road3:37:43G3 and N3 layouts complicated anti-aircraft fire but did not prevent adaptationQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 428:02How an interwar G3 refit might trade guns for speedQ&A
- Bruships 89: New Books (Christmas Recomendations) & Personal Accounts of War2:20:20G3 carriers cost more and complicate funnel trunkingQ&A
- Bruships 88: Way of War31:32Would Lexington battlecruisers trigger a naval race?Q&A
- Bruships 88: Way of War1:03:59Why Japan could welcome two British G3sQ&A
- Bruships 88: Way of War1:16:14Which hulls replace the large light-cruiser carriers?Q&A
- Bruships 88: Way of War1:27:06How G3 or Admiral-class carriers could reshape doctrineQ&A
- Bruships 88: Way of War1:53:00Would G3 carriers produce larger destroyers sooner?Q&A
- Patreon 61: Selborne-Fisher Scheme: Integration & De-Integration of Executive & Engineering Branches29:06Why do images exist of the unbuilt G3 battlecruisers?Q&A
- Five Weaknesses of Allied/Axis/Minor Navies in 1939 & 1940; Response to some Comments56:21Why Tillman battleships would not win an Anglo-American building raceQ&A
- Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times16:25Raven and Roberts on British battleship designChapter
- Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times26:02A British answer to the Tillman battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times1:46:29What 15-inch guns could buy G3 and Nelson designersQ&A
- Patreon 59: Infrastructure in the Colonies: shipyards of the Commonwealth and Empire.2:42:54How dividing the High Seas Fleet could reshape naval treatiesQ&A
- Bruships 82: New Books, Fun Books & Random Books43:13The N3 battleship's extreme armour schemeQ&A
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today2:11:38Why cancelled capital ships resist confident rankingsQ&A
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today2:17:49How G3 and N3 protection might absorb Long Lance hitsQ&A
- Projecting Mussonlini's Mare Nostrum: Italian 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine2:48Were G3 battlecruisers intended for 16-inch or 16.5-inch guns?Q&A
- Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions2:53:48How completed Lexingtons could preserve the G3sQ&A
- UAD Homage and Questions of US Cruiser Introduction Answered (Long Patrol)19:38How Britain might have continued after N3 and G3Q&A
- Blonde Class(Take 2): Scout Cruisers of the WWI Royal Navy (Long Patrol)12:04From a worldwide fleet to a North Sea fleetNotable Point
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 21:16:34What Britain would build with foreknowledge of 1939Q&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 22:06:06Why post-Jutland Britain still wanted fast battlecruisersQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 22:34:13Why N3 inherited an awkward midships turretQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)57:43G3 orders and the information gap before WashingtonNotable Point
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:09:10Three capital-ship generations without the building holidayChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)6:02How four G3 hulls might become aircraft carriersNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)30:26G3 conversions and an alternative Royal Navy fast fleetNotable Point
- My Royal Navy Washington Treaty Cruiser: with added Qs from "1939 Destroyer Doctrine" (Long Patrol)0:10Why the County class was not the only treaty-cruiser answerChapter
- Galaxy Class: A Naval Historian's view of Federation Cruisers & Ships of the 24th Century (Live)3:22:13Are five triple 15-inch turrets too much for a G3 hull?Q&A
- A Historical Possibility: Triple Turret Potentiality (Battleships Lost at Jutland)5:40Emergency construction versus industrial limitsNotable Point
- Patreon 53: Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN2:27How battleship losses at Jutland might have reshaped British designQ&A
- Bruships 79: Eight New Books, plus Discussions of a Naval Nature19:38The G3 is a battlecruiser when judged beside the N3Chapter
- Bruships 79: Eight New Books, plus Discussions of a Naval Nature1:28:30Post-Jutland building plans complicate the battlecruiser failure storyNotable Point
- Cut Price County Questions and a Modern Battle Cruiser: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)0:30Building a 40,000-ton battlecruiser in Ultimate Admiral: DreadnoughtsChapter
- Cut Price County Questions and a Modern Battle Cruiser: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)33:25How a small speed edge controls range and manoeuvreNotable Point
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...2:13:17Why the Royal Navy still wanted battlecruisersNotable Point
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...3:50:16How a missed dockyard cycle constrained the Admirals and later carriersQ&A
- County Cruisers P8: The County Class in War and Retrospect (Long Patrol)10:35Treaty ceilings distorted cruiser designChapter
- County Cruisers P8: The County Class in War and Retrospect (Long Patrol)32:26York as a cut-price CountyNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)51:44A G3-based successor after converting the Admiral classQ&A
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)2:03G3 conversions and the Royal Navy's strike-carrier gapChapter
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)1:13:03G3 conversions versus the Lexington hullNotable Point
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)1:19:25A seven-carrier British conversion program with hindsightQ&A
- Bruships 76: Five New Books & a Lot of New Questions3:26:36Hood, her sisters, and the path to fast battleshipsQ&A
- RMS Titanic, 110yrs on what lessons were learned?2:10:23Could political will have completed the G3s?Q&A
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)33:44British deck-edge lift studies - and their limitsNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)41:29HMS Eagle as a carrier-flagship modelNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)1:14:12G3 conversions as a strike-carrier forceChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)1:18:12What a G3 carrier conversion might enableNotable Point
- The Maple Confrontation (Equitable Washington Treaty Scenario): UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)8:40All-forward guns as a treaty-era efficiency choiceChapter
- Bruships 75: Following the 614th Running the Gauntlet1:20:18How four G3s would reshape British battlecruiser squadronsQ&A
- Bruships 75: Following the 614th Running the Gauntlet2:50:34Why a G3 made more sense as a carrier conversion than HoodQ&A
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion5:02From treaty tonnage to a full-load warshipNotable Point
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion9:10Designing a faster, larger NelsonChapter
- Bruships 73: Some Old, Some New, None Borrowed, but Some Blue1:01:05Why a battleship refit would skip a small calibre increaseQ&A
- Bruships 73: Some Old, Some New, None Borrowed, but Some Blue2:53:42The N3 sacrificed machinery space to its 18-inch batteryQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World55:22How G3 battlecruisers could reshape the wartime fleetQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World1:05:40Why a delayed Washington Treaty could raise battleship limitsQ&A
- What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)5:22A 28-knot alternative to Nelson and RodneyChapter
- All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)4:44G3: magazines, machinery, and existing dockyardsChapter
- All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)9:01Why the G3's middle turret and funnel trunking draw criticismNotable Point
- All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)32:03N3 and G3 as a fleet systemChapter
- All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)56:00Jutland was not the Royal Navy's only design lessonNotable Point
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament5:40Were G3 and N3 the parents of Nelson and Rodney?Q&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament12:02G3: concentrating armour, machinery, and dockyard needsNotable Point
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament26:24Why not move the third turret aft?Q&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament34:33Did G3 and N3 have protected command positions?Q&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament35:02Why wing turrets would not cure G3's aft blind arcQ&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament36:00Was G3 a battlecruiser or a fast battleship?Q&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament38:17Why prefer G3 over Iowa?Q&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament39:01Could G3 defeat Iowa?Q&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament44:35Were G3 and N3 bargaining tools at Washington?Q&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament46:47Could a G3 or N3 become a helicopter assault ship?Q&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament52:40How the G3 and N3 design letters workedNotable Point
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament1:12:54Could a rebuilt G3 move its middle turret?Q&A
- British Industry P4/4: Mobile Infrastructure (Bermuda Floating Docks to Illustrate)50:08Infrastructure constrains capital-ship designNotable Point
- Bruships 70: Travelling along...39:10A treaty system built around 45,000-ton capital shipsQ&A
- Some Sunday Naval Books34:54An unconstrained capital-ship technology raceNotable Point
- Some Sunday Naval Books36:37How treaty limits changed British strategyChapter
- What a the choice of Secondary gun calibre tells us: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)5:18Why dreadnought secondaries targeted torpedo craftChapter
- What a the choice of Secondary gun calibre tells us: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)25:34G3's layered gun and torpedo batteryNotable Point
- What a the choice of Secondary gun calibre tells us: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)28:21G3's six-inch guns and a Far Eastern missionChapter
- What a the choice of Secondary gun calibre tells us: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)30:55Reading design evidence against surviving paperworkNotable Point
- County Cruisers P3: The London Class (Long Patrol)11:29Foreign stations still needed ships below the battlecruiserNotable Point
- British Industry: The More than Just Ships P1/4 - Building (Long Patrol)3:48Dockyards as a limit on capital-ship designChapter
- Patreon 43: "Unverified stories of Norwegian Campaign: Tall Tales of Tribals"2:04:07Why a battlecruiser might keep smaller guns to preserve speedQ&A
- Question Time: Answering Knight6831's Questions (Long Patrol)1:55Could Britain have kept pace before Washington?Q&A
- Question Time: Answering Knight6831's Questions (Long Patrol)5:17Could Britain actually build the N3 and G3 designs?Notable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)2:05:03A four-battlecruiser allowance changes Britain's carrier hullsQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)2:20:50G3 and N3 construction would upset the Pacific balanceQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)2:33:56Without treaties, infrastructure sets the battleship ceilingQ&A
- Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...1:26:36Why a pre-Washington bonus ship would not be a third NelsonQ&A
- Bruships 63: The Writing Theorists - Corbett & Mahan, Richmond & Simms, Cable & Gorshkhov2:37:58The battleship generation that was not built beside HoodQ&A
- Bruships 63: The Writing Theorists - Corbett & Mahan, Richmond & Simms, Cable & Gorshkhov4:19:30Would converting the G3 hulls have made better carriers?Q&A
- My G3/N3 Dreadnought Battleship + Battle Cruiser = Fast Battleship Design0:57Why the G3's third turret troubles this designNotable Point
- My G3/N3 Dreadnought Battleship + Battle Cruiser = Fast Battleship Design7:22The cost of a quadruple-turret G3 hullChapter
- My G3/N3 Dreadnought Battleship + Battle Cruiser = Fast Battleship Design23:55G3, N3, and the blurred battlecruiser labelNotable Point
- Bruships 60: Covid Jab, Bad Back & New Books1:02:22Treaty alternatives for Lexington, G3, and AmagiQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)18:42Why moving the G3's third turret was not a simple fixQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)29:15The G3's efficient but restricted after turretChapter
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (7)3:22:47How Germany's U-boat turn reinforced British planningQ&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…1:37:47Larger capital-ship docks as a long-term investmentQ&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...1:30:32An 18-inch production line could rearm the G3Q&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...1:54:08Why four G3s beat four Admirals on design meritQ&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...1:57:01G3: engineering elegance versus fighting arcsQ&A
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...2:01:18Why fixing the G3 turret layout is difficultQ&A
- Patreon 34: Inter-war Naval Aircraft Development - what could have been?20:50Treaties shaped the carrier fleet that emergedChapter
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (6)2:27:52Why Britain developed the Nelsons' 24.5-inch torpedoesQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (5)1:12:56If every treaty navy received two replacement battleshipsQ&A
- Patreon 31: Armoured Cruisers in the Mediterranean in WWI56:04Why the Royal Navy preferred an 18-inch leapQ&A
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions1:32:46The G3's third turret privileged broadside fireQ&A
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 191016:23All-forward batteries can optimize the wrong problemNotable Point
- Some More Battle Cruisers53:44G3 trades Lexington's speed for a ninth 16-inch gunChapter
- Some More Battle Cruisers56:30G3's forward battery limits its tactical freedomChapter
- Some More Battle Cruisers1:04:35Postwar task-force doctrine reinforces G3's battlecruiser characterNotable Point
- The Battles of Dogger Bank 1696-19163:19:38Beatty's mixed interwar policy legacyNotable Point
- Counter Piracy in China in 1920s & 1930s: Long Patrol Part 218:21A larger carrier fleet reshapes Far East basingNotable Point
- Bruships 35: Personal Wars + a New Book from Pen & Sword2:55:00Why the Second World War favored fast battlecruisersNotable Point
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response2:18Could Britain afford the G3 and N3 programmes?Q&A
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response9:24G3 conversions and a larger treaty carrier normNotable Point
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response22:38G3 blind arcs and concentrated turret firepowerQ&A
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response32:15All-forward main guns versus the G3 and N3 Q turretQ&A
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response41:15G3 design lessons and carrier-conversion potentialNotable Point
- Bruships 33: History, Speeches & Quotations3:42:32How the G3 torpedo defence might have workedQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes5:31Why the G3 did not need its own spotting aircraftQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes10:37How the G3 and N3 ships might have been namedQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes32:24How different Grand Fleet leadership might have changed the G3Q&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes46:53The G3 orders halted by the Washington negotiationsChapter
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:25:35Why moving the G3 bridge aft complicated ship controlQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:28:39G3 speed versus N3 gun powerChapter
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:33:53Why the G3 reached the order stage before the N3Q&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:35:37Why additional G3s might have been more useful than N3sQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:37:13Why the Revenge class survived while the G3s disappearedQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:38:30The G3's layered torpedo-defense conceptChapter
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:39:52A fast battleship compromised by its center turretNotable Point
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:49:28Surviving G3s could have raised the treaty battleship ceilingNotable Point
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes2:23:11How G3 carrier conversions might have transformed naval aviationChapter
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes2:28:20G3 and N3 value depended on the battle contextQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes2:31:46A G3 carrier would have approached Lexington dimensionsQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes2:33:51A notional 72-aircraft G3 carrier air groupQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes2:43:43The G3's likely Second World War roleQ&A
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s2:35:25Why the G3 battlecruisers were not converted into carriersQ&A
- Bruships30: Nine Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects(Including 1939) & Three New Books1:53:53Nelson and Rodney under Washington Treaty limitsChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 5 of 5/Articles 17-2237:20King George V gun and turret compromisesNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 7: Warship Design Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:44:46What G3 conversions might have changed for British carriersQ&A
- Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy53:17The G3 design's structural compromiseNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 2a: Book Reviews/Q&A56:17Why the G3 design lacked useful growth marginQ&A