Related time notes
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:58:51A qualitative naval race needs role-specific comparisonsQ&A
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:58:55A British B-1 force and a smaller Army of the RhineNotable Point
- Rise of the Frigate Navies: Why so many nations are going Frigate and why others want them as well!33:26Arleigh Burke dominance and the burden of smaller allied fleetsNotable Point
- Rise of the Frigate Navies: Why so many nations are going Frigate and why others want them as well!1:34:45A Baltic conflict cannot assume spare allied forces elsewhereNotable Point
- Britain's Rearmament 1937 vs 2026: What Lessons are we forgetting?17:31The Committee of Imperial Defence and strategic continuityChapter
- Britain's Rearmament 1937 vs 2026: What Lessons are we forgetting?23:58Britain's defence treaties across changing governmentsChapter
- Britain's Rearmament 1937 vs 2026: What Lessons are we forgetting?27:43When alliance cooperation erodes national capabilitiesChapter
- Britain's Rearmament 1937 vs 2026: What Lessons are we forgetting?28:44Alliance specialisation and missing mine-warfare capacityNotable Point
- Britain's Rearmament 1937 vs 2026: What Lessons are we forgetting?30:46The Joint Expeditionary Force and carrier-led leadershipNotable Point
- Japanese Destroyers of WWII: Quantity is a Quality of it's own, it can also be a Decisive one1:08Quality had to include the ability to build enough shipsChapter
- Bruships 264: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:44:07What would a Royal Navy of 42 escorts require?Q&A
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...46:56NATO bases in former East GermanyQ&A
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:27:51Jellicoe's early Cold War importance and Soviet battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:25:49Corvette-sized OPVs and the risk of replacing frigatesQ&A
- The Big Frigate Discussion: ASWFs, F110s & Pohjanmaas vs Gowind, European Patrol Corvette & FF(X)35:40Replacing seven Finnish ships with four reduces assured availabilityChapter
- The Big Frigate Discussion: ASWFs, F110s & Pohjanmaas vs Gowind, European Patrol Corvette & FF(X)1:31:39US destroyer identity and the limits of a patrol frigateChapter
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:10:30A small navy in a NATO membership counterfactualQ&A
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:12:04Drone spending within the wider defence budgetNotable Point
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:25:48What bomber departures from Fairford can establishQ&A
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live4:01:08Flag-officer cuts and command layersQ&A
- USN Destroyers Fletcher to Gearings17:16Finding modern equivalents for the numerous general-purpose destroyerNotable Point
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...24:26Countries judged to have weathered wars of choice bestQ&A
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:00:40Why carriers make more sense for France than GermanyQ&A
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:06:18Why Germany was a likely Cold War battlefieldNotable Point
- Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail?21:08When allies assume someone else can sweep minesNotable Point
- Air Defence At Sea: From Air Ships in 1906, to drones in 2026 and everything in between...4:05:11Air-defence command and airborne control hubsQ&A
- What if Britain joined with Australian & Canada to build a 'Maximum' Invincible Class instead?5:43Cutting both carriers and their proposed alternativeNotable Point
- What if Britain joined with Australian & Canada to build a 'Maximum' Invincible Class instead?33:33Helicopter early warning and the Falklands funding decisionNotable Point
- Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:52:27A sustained third-largest Canadian fleet could become decisive in NATOQ&A
- Key Frigates of Today & Tomorrow: Type 26s, FREMMs & Nilgiris vs Mogami, Type 31s & FDIs10:16How NATO escort groups reinforce carrier formationsNotable Point
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:48:06Allied reliance created a mine-countermeasure gapNotable Point
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...23:55Germany's naval role in NATO logisticsNotable Point
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:28:07Why Ireland cannot assume Britain will provide its air defenceQ&A
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:31:38British ground air defence and a shared Aster missile poolNotable Point
- Bruships 254: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:53:31Britain's choice to emphasise maritime powerQ&A
- Bruships 254: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:26:33Why Britain needs a wartime HGV logistics reserveNotable Point
- Bruships 254: Naval History Questions Answered Live4:10:51Why NATO does not need one standard surface combatantQ&A
- Balancing the Humors: How are modern nations balancing diplomacy and war in the ships they build?36:31Mine countermeasures need hulls as well as technologyNotable Point
- Balancing the Humors: How are modern nations balancing diplomacy and war in the ships they build?2:30:15Swedish sea control and status assetsChapter
- Swedish Destroyers of the Cold War and Beyond: Balancing the Soviet Union & Russia23:19From armed neutrality to NATO membershipNotable Point
- Swedish Destroyers of the Cold War and Beyond: Balancing the Soviet Union & Russia38:55Luleå-class frigates and Baltic sea controlChapter
- Swedish Destroyers of the Cold War and Beyond: Balancing the Soviet Union & Russia42:26Luleå missile load and layered air defenceNotable Point
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 23:00:35The US Navy's NFR-90 frigate planQ&A
- Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:58:59Why NATO collective defence did not cover the FalklandsQ&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:27:53F-35 and S-400 information-security concernsQ&A
- WWI delayed by six years? What would the Navies look like? (Patreon Alternate History)3:44:20Why defence budgets are less secret than intelligence votesQ&A
- Durand de la Penne Class: The Destroyer class which showed the Oto Melara 76mm had came of age31:38Francesco Mimbelli's modernization and multinational missionsChapter
- The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?15:35The 3.5 percent pledge reveals the present spending gapChapter
- The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?1:41:35A NATO-first force may lose independent crisis optionsChapter
- The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?2:01:38The Estonia commitment is a tripwire and integration toolQ&A
- The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?3:41:27The discussion distinguishes British dependence from proxy controlQ&A
- The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?4:25:50Joint NATO assets save money but limit national choiceQ&A
- The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?5:04:54A Canadian operator could keep former RFA ships supporting NATOQ&A
- The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?5:54:43Britain's senior NATO command position could face pressureQ&A
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...50:55Common fuel for diesel engines and gas turbinesQ&A
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:56:00Why small NATO navies need senior officers at staff meetingsQ&A
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:08:55Western fleets without the post-Cold War peace dividendQ&A
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...7:46NATO focus collides with a wider Royal Navy missionChapter
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...54:11Collective security did not erase Britain's own naval tasksChapter
- The Defence Investment Plan: A Live Review if it's been published, A Chat of What to Look For if not1:09:03Swedish FDI frigates and Baltic logisticsQ&A
- The Defence Investment Plan: A Live Review if it's been published, A Chat of What to Look For if not2:07:22What 48 VLS cells provide under two-missile doctrineNotable Point
- The Defence Investment Plan: A Live Review if it's been published, A Chat of What to Look For if not2:46:09A Baltic bastion must secure NATO sea useQ&A
- The Defence Investment Plan: A Live Review if it's been published, A Chat of What to Look For if not2:57:18Possible responses if the Russian frigate incident escalatedQ&A
- Flotilla or Squadron? What Naval Unit is this?0:47Strike Fleet Atlantic turns the Soviet bastion into a defensive burdenNotable Point
- Could the US Navy have kept the Oliver Hazard Perry's in service for longer?52:43Why program continuity matters for airborne early warningQ&A
- Could the US Navy have kept the Oliver Hazard Perry's in service for longer?59:58Could NATO develop a shared modern frigate?Q&A
- Bruships 245: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:18:02A Cold War anecdote about Lego in minefieldsNotable Point
- Modularity Squared... What happens if the Stanflex & Meko combined into a single program?26:37An early MEKO-StanFlex partnership could create shared module poolsNotable Point
- Modularity Squared... What happens if the Stanflex & Meko combined into a single program?28:22Common modules separate ship purchases from weapon purchasesNotable Point
- Bruships 244: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:15:18How Aegis drives warship superstructure convergenceQ&A
- What Happens if Australia, Canada & the UK go all in on the Invincibles in the 1970s? (Patreon Live)13:42NATO's German front wins the budget fightNotable Point
- What Happens if Australia, Canada & the UK go all in on the Invincibles in the 1970s? (Patreon Live)25:41Invincible protects Norway reinforcement and Atlantic ASW groupsChapter
- Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...46:59Naval ship codes and construction standardsQ&A
- Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:38:46Why fixing RFA manning would not restore lost capacityQ&A
- Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:31:50Why a single European NATO navy would struggleQ&A
- Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:32:24Matching a hypothetical European navy to regional dutiesNotable Point
- US Navy Ship Building Plan 2026... a Live look at what is being planned...5:13:12What was the Royal Navy's large amphibious force for?Q&A
- US Navy Ship Building Plan 2026... a Live look at what is being planned...5:22:01How did Dutch Marines strengthen Britain's NATO amphibious force?Q&A
- Bruships 241: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:38:50What navies could do about an incoming asteroidQ&A
- Bruships 241: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:44:47Which Warhammer 40K navy looks most modern?Q&A
- SH-60 Seahawk/Oceanhawk/Rescuehawk/Romeo/Knighthawk... Key Aircraft Series 4 Aircraft 134:21Seahawk capability and the alliance division of laborNotable Point
- Bruships 238: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:30:16Europe's least nonsensical NATO procurementQ&A
- Bruships 238: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:32:39A postwar NATO cruiser design to keep developingQ&A
- Why do Modern Warships just keep getting bigger?1:07:16The hidden cost of missing capacityChapter
- Why the Royal Navy's Type 45s Daring Class Destroyers are what they are & what their future is?7:29Why NFR-90's common frigate coalition broke apartChapter
- Why the Royal Navy's Type 45s Daring Class Destroyers are what they are & what their future is?1:19:06HMS Duncan carried NATO duties in a de facto five-ship forceChapter
- How the USN learnt the lessons to conceive the Arleigh Burke class... From the Gearings to the Kidds49:41NF90 collides with the Burke generalist modelNotable Point
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:27:46Why NATO navies may wait on the next U.S. large combatantQ&A
- Bruships 235: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:59:11Britain's economic security and its short and long sea routesNotable Point
- Where has Britain's Royal Navy Gone?19:23How Britain's 1997 defence burden compared with NATONotable Point
- Escaping Hitler's Europe; How the warships of Europe escaped capture in WWII...1:20:50Force-extraction plans need bases and alliance fallbacksNotable Point
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:05:02The navy of a Hungary-Croatia-Slovenia unionQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:57:29A postwar Anglo-French union expands across EuropeQ&A
- How many Warships does your Navy need?28:54NATO standing groups expose Britain's escort shortfallNotable Point
- How many Warships does your Navy need?50:51Gulf and NATO taskings shaped the twelve-destroyer planChapter
- The rise and fall of Constellation class Frigate program? (Patreon Live)1:27:21Why a universal NATO frigate breaks downQ&A
- The rise and fall of Constellation class Frigate program? (Patreon Live)3:57:08Why allies cannot simply fill every US escort gapQ&A
- Bruships 228: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:09:53Irish neutrality and the cost of joining NATOQ&A
- Bruships 228: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:47:07Canada-China trade and NATO concernsQ&A
- Bruships 228: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:18:49Absalon as a high-latitude amphibious modelQ&A
- Bruships 228: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:36:49Greenland tensions and NATO defence supply chainsQ&A
- Bruships 228: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:48:02France's withdrawal from integrated command changed Atlantic reinforcement routesNotable Point
- Bruships 228: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:25:13Why Denmark accepted the Greenland defence arrangementQ&A
- Who was to blame for Norway falling in 1940?1:23:06Norway's postwar defence policy and the lessons of 1940Chapter
- Bruships 227: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:19:47If the United States bought Greenland during the Cold WarQ&A
- Bruships 227: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:24:48NATO naval contributions and the ability to sustain deploymentsNotable Point
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:55:03FDI or Type 31 for Sweden's next frigateQ&A
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:40:27The panel's disagreement over the risk of a Greenland seizureNotable Point
- Bruships 225: Naval History & Current Affairs Questions Answered Live...4:08:50State names, battle names, and the proposed BBG designationQ&A
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)1:36:15National commitments remain part of alliance fleet planningNotable Point
- Type 26 & Type 31 Frigate Program Updates: City, Hunter, River(Destroyer), Inspiration & the rest!57:28Why naval procurement needs experienced senior officersNotable Point
- Bruships 224: Alternate Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:03:34Cold War strike planning without polar routesQ&A
- Why Historians sometimes seem to 'rewrite' History?2:16Imperial cost cutting and military reliabilityChapter
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:35:43Why carriers buy coalition leadershipNotable Point
- A Chinese Invasion of Taiwan: A Historian’s Eye View & A Patreon’s Request…(Live 2)1:28:38Snap exercises can depend on weeks of logistical preparationNotable Point
- Commodore Michael Clapp & the 1982 Falklands War; #2Historians 2025 starts off49:25The institutional challenge of Commodore Amphibious WarfareChapter
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle5:00:03A 1980 NATO-Warsaw Pact fleet swap and the maintenance problemQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War6:42:19The assumptions behind a Fascist Italy inside NATOQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War7:46:52Pacific security relationships and NATO's geographic frameNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust1:40:07A common Baltic patrol ship without surrendering national yardsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust1:40:07Why shared waters make joint warship design easierNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust54:34A proposed alternative to the Beeching cuts and a hypothetical Norway rail linkQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress2:05:49Alliance presentation and the shortage of carrier escortsNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida6:08:45NATO without the United States would face a logistics gapQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy I1:01:22Spearfish speed and the American engine behind itQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy I1:06:33Why shared Spearfish technology did not produce a NATO torpedoNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy I1:49:28Where modern English-language ship classifications come fromQ&A
- Bruships 219: Naval History Questions Answered Live...37:27Intelligence failure can begin with the wrong assumptionsQ&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:46:42US fleet production and allied availabilityQ&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:49:54Why VLS counts cannot rank every warshipQ&A
- Nuclear Powered Warships: are they worth the cost?19:08Kirov-class cruisers as an offset strategyChapter
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...After Power Cut1:37:40De-escalation through stronger NATO posture in EstoniaQ&A
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:10:51Could a US Buccaneer purchase save CVA-01?Q&A
- Cultural Drivers of National Military Organisation/Structure - a quick guide...22:34Why Britain and Japan diverged in maritime force structureNotable Point
- Cultural Drivers of National Military Organisation/Structure - a quick guide...1:16:52Mountain troops follow borders - or alliance commitmentsNotable Point
- Cultural Drivers of National Military Organisation/Structure - a quick guide...1:41:19Reverse-engineer a country's force structureNotable Point
- Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:41:31Russian drones over Poland and NATO's graduated responseQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...6:42:45A 1910 Russian Empire dropped into the modern worldQ&A
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:53:55A NATO Atlantic convoy escort in 1975Q&A
- Admiral Sergey Gorshkov: Life, Lessons & Writings of the man who Conceived the Cold War Soviet Navy18:19NATO repeatedly mistook Gorshkov's deputies for successorsNotable Point
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...19:37Why Vanguard alone cannot cover a battleship threatNotable Point
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...22:09Could NATO share the battleship response to Royal Sovereign?Q&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...39:09A 1991 Soviet hardliner warQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...43:25Soviet garrisons in a war of political disintegrationNotable Point
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:24:02NATO discovers an 80,000-ton Soviet missile shipQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:05:05Kirov-class cruisers with six-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:46:53Vichy France resists postwar reunificationQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:45:31Britain remains a postwar naval superpowerQ&A
- Lessons of Falklands War(1982) and Ukraine War(2022-)27:05Northern-flank training supplied Falklands expertiseNotable Point
- Lessons of Falklands War(1982) and Ukraine War(2022-)28:57Alliance specialization left an airborne-warning gapChapter
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:20:00Could a Vulcan successor fit Britain's contribution to NATO?Q&A
- How has Ukraine confirmed, dispelled or updated the lessons of the Falklands War 1982?2:25:21Could Ukraine join NATO after the war?Q&A
- Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:01:34F-35A nuclear certification versus OCU valueQ&A
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:05:09Would a British-Japanese alliance grow into a Pacific NATO?Q&A
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:49:53Mark 41 canisters integrate European naval missilesQ&A
- Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers23:09NATO pursued V/STOL to escape vulnerable fixed air basesChapter
- Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers26:17NBMR-3 prompted a wide field of British V/STOL designsChapter
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?2:17:22Imperial interoperability through common standardsNotable Point
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?2:46:24Would other nations join the imperial naval system?Q&A
- Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:07:37Why Europe cannot have one ideal anti-air corvetteQ&A
- Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:06:05What military field rations are designed to provideQ&A
- Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:14:58How the West might answer twelve Project 23560 destroyersQ&A
- Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:11:07Could Britain return to NATO nuclear sharing with B61 bombs?Q&A
- Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:14:34Would nuclear sharing provide a controlled tactical response?Q&A
- Isolationist America: What should Australia, Britain & Canada do if it happens in the next 5 years?5:07Military withdrawal rather than total economic isolationChapter
- Isolationist America: What should Australia, Britain & Canada do if it happens in the next 5 years?42:29Rebuilding alliances faster than fleetsNotable Point
- Isolationist America: What should Australia, Britain & Canada do if it happens in the next 5 years?59:04The danger of a NATO standards vacuumChapter
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:29:42Can limited war aims contain nuclear escalation?Q&A
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:35:24Why a small nuclear weapon can require a strategic decisionNotable Point
- Bruships 193: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:34:59Carrier battle groups on NATO's northern flankQ&A
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:25:20Why the United States was unlikely to be surprised at SuezQ&A
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:50:10How paperwork can erode naval readinessNotable Point
- Bruships 191: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:36:30From submarine rescue bells to self-propelled DSRVsQ&A
- Bruships 191: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:57:42Why visible military readiness can preserve peaceQ&A
- Britannia Naval College: Evolution of Education & Cradle of Leadership35:44Entry standards and the information burden of modern naval warfareNotable Point
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:08:40How allied procurement changes with less American backstoppingQ&A
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:15:00Whether Russia could move the Baltic Fleet before a NATO warQ&A
- Coastal defenses in WWII: Why did they fail to stop so many amphibious operations?3:09:41NATO standardization did not make British and American amphibious doctrine identicalQ&A
- Strategic Defence & Security Review 2025: What would a naval historian do?1:01:20Trade routes and alliances make British strategy globalNotable Point
- Strategic Defence & Security Review 2025: What would a naval historian do?1:48:01Restore the Royal Marines as an amphibious brigadeChapter
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!2:14:16Western navies suited to coalition escort workQ&A
- The Life of Admiral Sir Frederick Hew George Dalrymple-Hamilton: When Speed is never enough!3:25:43Why Soviet cruisers operated far from NATO's main theaterNotable Point
- Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...1:20:54Britain's limited forward deployment of WE.177Notable Point
- Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...3:29:17Alliance dependence and the peacetime defense cycleNotable Point
- Bruships 186: Naval History Questions Answered Live...12:44How NATO priorities reshaped British force structureNotable Point
- Bruships 186: Naval History Questions Answered Live...15:02Alliance disruption and the new strategic normalNotable Point
- Bruships 186: Naval History Questions Answered Live...17:21Alliance trust, dependence, and sovereign capabilityNotable Point
- Bruships 183: Science Fiction/Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:46:46NATO replenishment-at-sea capability and its limitsQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...16:41A strategically autonomous Cold War Royal NavyQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...26:23Why NATO magazines still use stripper clipsNotable Point
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:38:16Amphibious ships, NATO commitments, and defence prioritiesNotable Point
- Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...Part II53:43How the Korean War accelerated NATO's transonic-aircraft lessonsQ&A
- Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...Part II1:10:50What fleet could a better-funded Ireland sustain?Q&A
- Bruships 179: Future Projects & Naval History Questions...3:05:30Why US destroyer escorts were not initially called frigatesQ&A
- Bruships 178: Naval History or Exercise14:59How allies would view a Spanish naval modernization planQ&A
- Bruships 178: Naval History or Exercise1:37:34NATO escalation after Soviet chemical warfareQ&A
- Bruships 178: Naval History or Exercise1:46:49Greenland, Arctic basing, and the GIUK gapQ&A
- Bruships 178: Naval History or Exercise1:50:15Does renting territory for a military base create new risks?Q&A
- Bruships 178: Naval History or Exercise3:12:22Why defence needs matter more than a GDP percentageQ&A
- Bruships 177: New Year, same Dr Alex... possibly with new gym membership3:31:02Why Tomahawk is becoming NATO's common long-range strike weaponQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?1:42:43Why tactical nuclear use does not stay limitedNotable Point
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?2:23:37Why Britain prioritized the Army of the RhineQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?2:43:30Royal Navy ASW groups used helicopters under allied air coverQ&A
- So You Want to Build an Aircraft Carrier: Operation & Learning From Experience! Part 3 or 1 of 338:45Soviet distant raiders were meant to dilute NATO strengthNotable Point
- Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 20244:13:41Why a carrier is the wrong tool for attacking Russia's Arctic routeQ&A
- Hunting Submarines from WWI to Present Day; How Aircraft, Ships & Submarines Work Together?37:31SOSUS and SURTASS build an ocean surveillance networkChapter
- Hunting Submarines from WWI to Present Day; How Aircraft, Ships & Submarines Work Together?55:56Shore headquarters prioritize contacts; ships retain cautionChapter
- Santa's Sleigh... A Quick History - Key Aircraft Series 3, Aircraft 315:31Route secrecy and worldwide protection of Santa's flightNotable Point
- Anti Submarine Warfare, a primer history & overview1:14:08The post-counterinsurgency ASW infrastructure gapNotable Point
- Anti Submarine Warfare, a primer history & overview1:21:51Choosing P-1 or P-8 by theater and alliance networkNotable Point
- Anti Submarine Warfare, a primer history & overview1:46:01Command decisions, uncertain contacts, and active sonarChapter
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...54:53Carriers for a European and global BritainChapter
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...1:10:17The allied carrier networkChapter
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/43:35:54Where NATO amphibious operations against Russia would be plausibleQ&A
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/45:08:40A 1970s war around the GIUK GapQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/47:00:11A Royal Navy built for strategic autonomy after SuezQ&A
- Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax4:25:13A broad Indo-Pacific alliance would gain reach and coordination costsQ&A
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 11:22:26An Atlantic carrier navy as a diplomatic instrumentNotable Point
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 12:25:26CV(A)-01 and the cost of abandoning a distinctive NATO roleNotable Point
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!4:19:03Complete carrier groups took priority over nuclear cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song25:05A Soviet Orel-class carrier could have preserved CVA-01Q&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song2:42:01How built CVA-01 carriers would alter a Soviet naval problemQ&A
- Battle of Santa Cruz: The Deathsong of Japanese Naval Aviation in WWII1:43:03USS Robin turned carrier shortage into Allied integrationNotable Point
- Vought F 8 Crusader: The Cold War Corgi! Key Aircraft Series 2, Aircraft 940:21The Crusader in French carrier serviceChapter
- Traditional French Bonhomie to spare via the only non USN Nuclear Carrier! The Charles de Gaulle!38:15Early availability problems and operations off AfghanistanChapter
- Bruships 167: Tell me why, everything turned book – packing up, stacking up is all kalax want to do.2:04:12If Spain had received an Essex-class carrierQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!2:56:10How the Dutch Van Speijk frigates served NATOQ&A
- Through Deck Cruisers: The Kiev & Invincible Classes of Aircraft Carrier14:24Nordic neutrality met rapid-escalation assumptionsNotable Point
- Through Deck Cruisers: The Kiev & Invincible Classes of Aircraft Carrier55:15Soviet Indian Ocean deployments drew NATO forces awayNotable Point
- Super Carriers & Specialists: The Aircraft Carrier Debate from WWII to present...51:27Carrier capability as independence of actionChapter
- Bruships 158: Home for Naval History Questions & Trialing the new Question Bot... so cross fingers!2:36:44F/A-18 commonality versus a domestic British carrier fighterQ&A
- Bruships 158: Home for Naval History Questions & Trialing the new Question Bot... so cross fingers!2:41:19Britain's blue-water choices in a multipolar worldNotable Point
- Bruships 157: Books so good they've blown the budget on the #ScandiShip24 tour already!20:11A combined-arms approach to Baltic port denialQ&A
- Bruships 157: Books so good they've blown the budget on the #ScandiShip24 tour already!1:24:16Narvik books as local evidence for the Norwegian campaignChapter
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?1:40:53Why Britain did not widely adopt coastal missile batteriesQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?2:58:22Converting cruise liners into NATO hospital shipsQ&A
- Check Campaign 19: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign27:20Who can still make a 12-inch naval gun?Q&A
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!1:10:37Amphibious vehicles for NATO water crossingsQ&A
- The OG Junglies: 845 Squadron Fleet Air Arm, Audio Hostem34:06First-in, last-out helicopter support after the Cold WarNotable Point
- USS Midway is it magic or surviable? Key Ships Series 9: Ship 124:43Operation Mainbrace tested NATO's Atlantic commandNotable Point
- Agamemnon was not alone: The Ardent Class Third Rate 64s - Key Ships Series 8, Ship 101:23:26Type 83, air defense, and the cost of specializationNotable Point
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends1:46:04Novorossiysk in the postwar battleship gapQ&A
- So You Want to Build an Aircraft Carrier: Design! Part 1 or 39:23Measure alliance strength by willingness to commitNotable Point
- French Naval Aviation: A Quick Historical Overview & Introduction to it's Squadrons39:59French independence inside NATO carrier operationsNotable Point
- Check Campaign 13: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign3:22:34Leaving NATO would trigger a U.S. constitutional fightNotable Point
- Patreon 101: If Lord Fisher died in Jan 1914, how does Prince Louis of Battenberg perform as 1SL?3:15:09Would Battenberg prepare plans for unlikely wars?Q&A
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built1:47:54Why Britain avoided striking Buenos Aires in the Falklands WarQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered4:23:47Smart weapons depend on training and force integrationQ&A
- Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London2:36:26Swedish arms production adds capacity to NATONotable Point
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books45:37How Sweden and Finland deepen NATO's Baltic defenseQ&A
- Aircraft Carriers in Science Fiction1:39:28Post-Cold War readiness was shaped by wars-of-choice assumptionsNotable Point
- Trident Fails to Fly5:48Britain's nuclear and conventional deterrence imbalanceChapter
- Trident Fails to Fly6:30How nuclear deterrence sets boundaries between powersNotable Point
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered1:14:39Royal Navy designations before NATO-style abbreviationsQ&A
- The HMS Ark Royals Saga: A History of Naval Aviation in a Name...52:44CVA-01 commonality versus reinventing carrier capabilityNotable Point
- Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:24:42A 1950 British fast battleship would align with American 16-inch logisticsQ&A
- Patreon 91: Flower class sloops: The most key ship of the 20th century?3:13:34Why many NATO patrol ships retain 20 mm gunsQ&A
- Stalingrad Class: Stalin's Ship Dreams - KSS2 S7 Comment Response18:21How a balanced Soviet fleet changes NATO prioritiesChapter
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response59:43Arms races can persist among alliesNotable Point
- Naval Historian Reacts to Four Random Books 30 - Courage14:29Estonian mortars demonstrate practical NATO interoperabilityNotable Point
- Bruships 131: Battleships...2:42:39American ambivalence toward Britain's nuclear deterrentQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships1:38:19Britain's two hard choices in the Suez CrisisQ&A
- Future Maritime Strategy: Beyond Cable and Corbett12:08Why the post-Cold War peace assumption failedChapter
- The Sydney Strategy: What if the British Empire Far East Base was Sydney not Singapore1:35:24Joint planning could reduce the command failures around Force ZNotable Point
- When does a navy know it is time to replace a type or class of ships? P2/2 Lego enhanced discussion39:23Modularity must match a navy's expected roleNotable Point
- Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series2:08:39Wrens and the burden of standardized naval acronymsQ&A
- Bruships 125: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series12:05Why a US invasion of Cuba would not automatically break NATOQ&A
- Bruships 125: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series1:38:36How British boiling vessels spread through allied vehiclesNotable Point
- Sea Power of the Cold War: When Strategy got overwritten by Technology and Week Planner18:35Alliances and technology as strategic shortcutsNotable Point
- Sea Power of the Cold War: When Strategy got overwritten by Technology and Week Planner49:16Who can spare a carrier for a distant war?Notable Point
- Sea Power of the Cold War: When Strategy got overwritten by Technology and Week Planner1:03:05Norway plans that assumed the ships would not returnNotable Point
- Sea Power of the Cold War: When Strategy got overwritten by Technology and Week Planner1:11:16The merchant marine and NATO's unanswered long-war problemChapter
- Bruships: Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:15:16Why an isolationist America means no historical NATOQ&A
- British Capture of Trincomalee(1795) & it’s consequences1:56:02Can economic and diplomatic power replace defence?Q&A
- British Capture of Trincomalee(1795) & it’s consequences2:06:12Why Anglo-Dutch amphibious forces specialize in the northQ&A
- From Beavers to Ersatz Monarchs & Francesco Caracciolos38:24What CANZUK would add to existing defence relationshipsQ&A
- Mistakes of WWII caused by WWI45:19Neutrality was protection only while belligerents allowed itChapter
- Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture51:23Weapons stocks and NATO support for Ukraine in July 2023Q&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy15:10Keeping battleships needs a support systemQ&A
- Patreon 80: The most annoying & damaging 'myths' about the Royal Navy in the Treaty Years & WWII?3:18:44Britain's naval power did not vanish in 1945Notable Point
- Slava Class: Comment Response2:37Hood's modernisation and Moskva's maintenance failureQ&A
- Kara Class: Comment Response17:58NATO reinforcement needs behind the Sea HarrierNotable Point
- Stalins Dream Fleets & the Potential Responses48:02How a stronger Soviet fleet could reshape NATO commitmentsNotable Point
- Stalins Dream Fleets & the Potential Responses50:37A more maritime NATO instead of an Army-of-the-Rhine focusNotable Point
- Bruships 114: Alternate Histories, What Ifs & Questions from Chat2:08:04What a standardized 1950s NATO fleet might borrowQ&A
- Bruships 110: Naval Aviation2:57:54Pristina airport and the value of subordinate judgmentNotable Point
- Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 198028:35Why Denmark and Norway anchor British northern securityChapter
- Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 198037:25A broad transit route rather than a narrow straitNotable Point
- Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 198050:11NATO's northern command and reinforcement problemChapter
- Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 198052:34When NATO escort and strike orders point in different directionsNotable Point
- Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 19801:19:43Submarine posture creates dilemmas before warChapter
- Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 19801:30:20Norway's terrain turns warning into combat powerChapter
- Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 19801:36:39Could NATO hold together over a war confined to Norway?Notable Point
- Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 19801:51:58Why a Norway-only war could test West GermanyNotable Point
- Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 19801:55:46How the Norwegian Sea campaign might unfoldChapter
- Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 19801:58:11NATO's conventional advantage and Soviet industrial resilienceChapter
- Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)59:07Why the GIUK Gap remains strategically importantChapter
- Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)1:06:34How do GIUK defences constrain NATO as well as Russia?Q&A
- Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)1:24:29NATO's northern flank and the Atlantic reinforcement problemChapter
- Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)2:03:13Iceland's dispersed defence and vulnerable supply routesChapter
- Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)2:55:58Would Argentina exploit a NATO-Soviet war to seize the Falklands?Q&A
- Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)2:59:11Norway, Svalbard, and an unexpected northern offensiveChapter
- Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)3:12:04Greenland and central Europe threaten to widen the northern warChapter
- Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)3:15:07Could a northern offensive split NATO's response?Chapter
- Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)3:37:20A conventional NATO edge and the danger of escalationChapter
- Blockading Brest: A Royal Navy Tradition12:45A maritime expeditionary role for Britain in NATONotable Point
- Blockading Brest: A Royal Navy Tradition17:09Q&A: Why not integrate the British and French armiesQ&A
- Blockading Brest: A Royal Navy Tradition23:17NATO as deterrence and alliance managementNotable Point
- Revolutionary Battles - Battle of the Rice Boats(1776) & Battle of San Nicolás (1811)1:45:22A 2023 warning about depending on outer air-defence layersNotable Point
- Bruships 103: Belfast Parts yet to arrive... so let's consider the Run up to War...41:50Standardized carriers strengthen the postwar fleetQ&A
- Bruships 99: Political History, Geostrategic History & Naval History3:23:51Soviet battleships and NATO's capital-ship reactionQ&A
- Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-6532:33A Soviet missile battleship could prompt a joint NATO designQ&A
- Battle of Coronel in Retrospect53:59Shared threats and hostile alliesNotable Point
- Top 5 Inventions that came too Late18:10The out-of-area airborne-early-warning gapChapter
- US Nuclear Powered Cruisers: Long Beach to Arkansas - The Atom Unleashed22:52Reclassification politics turned destroyer leaders into cruisersChapter
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers51:42Precision strikes do not remove the ammunition problemNotable Point
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers1:02:16Gun stockpiles and precision-weapons limitsQ&A
- HMCS Haida & The Tribal Class: Always Service1:02:26Cayuga from Korea to early NATO exercisesChapter
- Soviet Navy Part 3/3: 1965-1991 - Trying to Win Cold War before it turned Hot?6:05Why the late Soviet Navy was builtChapter
- Soviet Navy Part 3/3: 1965-1991 - Trying to Win Cold War before it turned Hot?14:29Surface raiders and submarine dilemmasNotable Point
- Soviet Navy Part 3/3: 1965-1991 - Trying to Win Cold War before it turned Hot?17:51Why bombers do not provide a cheap answer to a raiderNotable Point
- Soviet Navy Part 3/3: 1965-1991 - Trying to Win Cold War before it turned Hot?43:20Kirov as a prestige capital ship beside SlavaChapter
- Soviet Navy Part 3/3: 1965-1991 - Trying to Win Cold War before it turned Hot?49:09Why shadowing Kirov became a political problemNotable Point
- Soviet Navy Part 3/3: 1965-1991 - Trying to Win Cold War before it turned Hot?1:19:14Naval strategy as procurement strategyChapter
- Soviet Navy Part 3/3: 1965-1991 - Trying to Win Cold War before it turned Hot?1:19:36Delaying NATO and the question of a seaborne deterrentNotable Point
- Bruships 93: Soviet Navy Books & Random Books2:53:20Could NATO tolerate Soviet-built Icelandic frigates?Q&A
- Sverdlov Class: The Last of Stalin's Soviet Gun Cruisers11:08Sverdlov's four overlapping missionsChapter
- Sverdlov Class: The Last of Stalin's Soviet Gun Cruisers19:58The larger Soviet task-group vision behind SverdlovNotable Point
- Bruships 90: Books From the Road37:51Iver Huitfeldt-class frigates balance capability with a small navy's budgetQ&A
- BC-304 Daedalus Class: Stargate SG1's Battle Cruisers (Comment Response)1:09:47Do not size ammunition stocks for a cooperative enemyQ&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Comment Response Video1:11:09Why NATO assumptions did not rescue Cold War warship designQ&A
- Bruships 88: Way of War3:43:38The United States as an overcommitted powerQ&A
- Abruzzi Class: Condottieri of the Regia Marina27:26Giuseppe Garibaldi from fleet actions to guided missilesChapter
- Bruships 87: Books Found on My Travels, New Books & Christmas Recomendations1:12:37Alliance consequences of a covert attack at seaQ&A
- French Navy Fights on in 1940: Comment Response Video44:07Why long counterfactual chains become fragileQ&A
- Battle of Arausio (105BC), lessons of an Ancient Land Battle…1:57Could NATO strike the Russian Black Sea Fleet?Q&A
- Chapyev Class (Projekt 68 of the Soviet Navy): Fighting the Peace47:21Surface cruisers multiply the threat to NATO commerceChapter
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 32:03:43Why Poland would avoid trading NATO confidence for Chinese loansQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 32:06:08Vanguard submarines and Britain's NATO nuclear umbrellaQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 32:08:27Why an unspecified warning preserves strategic optionsQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 32:13:24Why nuclear use is categorically different from thermobaric attackQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1941-421:27:56The limits of national control over modern defence supply chainsQ&A
- Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times3:17:33A fifth NATO battleship for Atlantic surface groupsQ&A
- Patreon 59: Infrastructure in the Colonies: shipyards of the Commonwealth and Empire.2:45:42A Canadian carrier could reinforce NATO while Britain sailed southQ&A
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today1:18:36Why formal security guarantees change alliance obligationsQ&A
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today1:22:57Why Naval Strike Missile production should be geographically dispersedNotable Point
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today1:30:09How Sweden and Finland change Baltic reinforcementQ&A
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today1:36:53Sea control only has to last long enough for the missionNotable Point
- Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack34:13A multinational task group for a Black Sea food convoyNotable Point
- Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack43:35Defending an internationally sanctioned Black Sea convoyQ&A
- Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack47:14Why a British carrier was the wrong Black Sea signalQ&A
- Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions17:24Why common systems beat a single European frigate hullQ&A
- Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions34:09Russia's different Baltic and Black Sea fleet problemsQ&A
- Modern Frigates: Cruisers by any other name? (Patreon 57 Long Patrol)56:24Horizon shows where multinational standardization worksChapter
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 244:32Modern Maunsell forts as fixed air-defense sitesQ&A
- Action of the 18th June 1799: How to Lose Frigates and Influence (Live)2:03:37Push and pull logistics trade certainty for responsivenessNotable Point
- Patreon 53: Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN2:04:43Canada's NATO spending gap and small-batch ship costsChapter
- Patreon 53: Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN2:44:05Why Canadian defence growth need not start with healthcare cutsQ&A
- Patreon 53: Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN3:06:16When defence spending does not buy current capabilityNotable Point
- Finnish War 1808-9 (Sweden vs Russia): A War of Autocracies (Long Patrol)40:56Lemo and Oravais showed the limits of littoral manoeuvreChapter
- Finnish War 1808-9 (214th Anniversary of the Battle of Kuopio)2:32:27A 2022 High North reinforcement conceptNotable Point
- Finnish War 1808-9 (214th Anniversary of the Battle of Kuopio)2:34:49How close are Northern Fleet bases to Finland?Q&A
- Bruships 76: Five New Books & a Lot of New Questions3:43:43Why changing heavy weapons takes more than trainingQ&A
- Bruships 75: Following the 614th Running the Gauntlet2:47:27April 2022 caution on Black Sea naval deploymentsQ&A
- Patreon 50: 1939 Destroyer Doctrine of the combatant navies & Where did it come from?1:39:29When French and Italian navies gained Hedgehog-style ASW weaponsQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World1:21:10Why NATO's paper strength can exceed deployable powerNotable Point
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World1:32:52The flaw in a one-sided war-of-choice doctrineNotable Point
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World1:46:03Why keeping armoured divisions in Europe was not enoughQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World1:53:46Why NATO should pressure low-spending members without expelling themQ&A
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment2:24:32How coercion can drive neighboring states toward alliancesQ&A
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment2:42:02Why allies may prefer missile defense to new nuclear arsenalsQ&A
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment2:58:11Germany's defense fund as accumulated catch-up spendingQ&A
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment3:35:38Polish border deterrence and the risk of escalationQ&A
- Some Sunday Naval Books6:46The British way of war as strategyChapter
- Bruships 69: The Decider22:55Why the Royal Navy would avoid the BalticQ&A
- Bruships 68: Random Naval History Books & Questions1:37:30A surviving British Commonwealth in the Cold WarQ&A
- Bruships 68: Random Naval History Books & Questions2:50:05The Baltic air-defence problem as seen in 2022Q&A
- The Principles and Factors of Cruiser Design(Live)2:25How did the January 2022 Russia-NATO proposal look at the time?Q&A
- Quirky Classes and What they tell us about their navies… (Live)2:14:33Pegasus and Bras d'Or: hydrofoil promiseChapter
- Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...2:51:26The Falklands War as a test of Western doctrine against Western weaponsNotable Point
- Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...3:35:19Why the United States did not welcome Britain's CATOBAR retreatQ&A
- Inspiration of Theorists: The Maritime & Strategic Lessons of the Seven Years War (1756-63)1:08:51Q&A: treaties can deter one war and displace anotherQ&A
- Patreon 36: Repair Ships, Depot Ships, Tenders and Stores Ships...1:49:19British defence spending and the NATO central frontNotable Point
- Patreon 38: Evaluating Type 26 Frigates against WW2 ship classes...1:22:08Geography explains why the three fleets use similar hulls differentlyChapter
- Bruships 56: "Walking Softly & Carrying a Big Stick" - Admirals, Diplomacy & Detterence3:22:14Frigates as a tool of alliance burden sharingQ&A
- Shipbuilding through the 1880s-1950s3:13:54Whiskey-class production and the postwar submarine scareNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (5)2:30:04Why Britain retained war plans against the United StatesQ&A
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper1:45:26Royal Navy carriers in NATO's Atlantic war planChapter
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper2:15:23Why carriers remained relevant in a European warNotable Point
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper2:25:33Cold War nuclear assumptions and carrier debateChapter
- British Geostrategic Situation in the 1960s: The 1966 White Paper17:51BAOR strength subject to foreign-exchange supportNotable Point
- British Geostrategic Situation in the 1960s: The 1966 White Paper29:24Alliances and the need for national capabilityChapter
- Bruships 52: A Year of Bruships - Questions & Books3:07:55STOVL commonality across allied carrier decksQ&A
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): Part 2, 190625:00Why alliance interoperability multiplies coalition powerNotable Point
- Pseudo Patreon British Aircraft Carrier development Since 1945 (as suggested by Kyle Hardman)1:50:06Did small carriers push the Royal Navy toward narrower roles?Q&A
- Pseudo Patreon British Aircraft Carrier development Since 1945 (as suggested by Kyle Hardman)2:13:01CVA-01 was planned as the center of a carrier-group systemChapter
- Bruships 46: Accounts of Naval War3:00:21Why 100,000 troops do not equal a fixed number of divisionsQ&A
- Patreon 22: If the Cold War went hot in 1986 would NATO's navies keep the Altantic Going?1:18:15Forward carrier groups create depth for the convoy battleChapter
- Patreon 22: If the Cold War went hot in 1986 would NATO's navies keep the Altantic Going?1:49:51What could Canada contribute to the Atlantic battle?Q&A
- Patreon 22: If the Cold War went hot in 1986 would NATO's navies keep the Altantic Going?1:51:20Which fleet could rearm faster after the opening battles?Q&A
- Patreon 22: If the Cold War went hot in 1986 would NATO's navies keep the Altantic Going?2:07:24Soviet massed power meets NATO multirole flexibilityChapter
- Patreon 22: If the Cold War went hot in 1986 would NATO's navies keep the Altantic Going?2:52:51Would a conventional Cold War naval campaign stay non-nuclear?Q&A
- Bruships 45: Something Medieval4:16:15A viewer links the Czech depot response to proof and escalationNotable Point
- Prince Philips Navy2:25:21Why postwar records can call a sloop a frigateQ&A
- Bruships 44: Strategy3:01:33Why did the postwar Royal Navy contract?Q&A
- Four Random Books 31: The Conduct of War4:53Sarajevo and the bargaining logic of demilitarisationChapter
- Bruships 41: A History of Armour & Amphibious Warfare (Kyle Hardman)4:20:54How trade treaties could reshape post-Brexit defence procurementQ&A
- Crown Colony Class Long Patrol: Part 3 Trinidad to Bermuda39:59Gambia mixes British and American fire-control systemsNotable Point
- Bruships 40: Favourite Books to Use When Writing...1:46:01A Town-class history connects HMS Birmingham to postwar crisesChapter
- Crown Colony Class Cruisers2:40:18HMS Bermuda from Operation Torch to NATO exercisesChapter
- Crown Colony Class Cruisers3:13:21Uganda returns as HMCS QuebecNotable Point
- Four Random Books 27: Tom Clancy16:24Oil scarcity drives Red Storm Rising's NATO warChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P5 the Royal Navy of the 1980s1:57John Nott's fiscal logic behind the 1981 naval cutsChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P4 Britain in the World0:38The Royal Navy's 1980s mission setChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P4 Britain in the World2:27Why northern-flank reinforcement needed amphibious liftChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P4 Britain in the World11:29Alliance geography and the risks at NATO's marginsChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P4 Britain in the World14:19NATO and Warsaw Pact surface-force balanceChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P4 Britain in the World18:52Mine warfare and the submarine arithmeticNotable Point
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P4 Britain in the World21:59Maritime air power and the bomber threatNotable Point
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P4 Britain in the World44:17Atlantic distance and NATO's maritime strategic problemChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P3b/7 Keith Speed (Continued)6:24Royal Marines recruitment and Arctic readinessChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P3b/7 Keith Speed (Continued)12:14Pre-positioning in Norway and peace monitoring in RhodesiaChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P2/7 Keith Speed4:03Britain's standing-army tradition and the BAOR bargainNotable Point
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P2/7 Keith Speed10:58NATO's Atlantic lifeline and the Soviet blue-water challengeChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P2/7 Keith Speed19:29Carrier redeployment exposes NATO's reinforcement tradeoffNotable Point
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P2/7 Keith Speed21:57The Royal Navy's Cold War anti-submarine roleChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P2/7 Keith Speed30:37Who controlled Britain's Polaris deterrent?Q&A
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P2/7 Keith Speed36:20Could European NATO navies operate worldwide?Q&A
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P1/7 Sir Patrick Duffy2:15Patrick Duffy frames NATO as a maritime allianceChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P1/7 Sir Patrick Duffy6:15NATO's economy and reinforcement plans depend on Atlantic shippingChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P1/7 Sir Patrick Duffy20:16SACLANT cannot both contain the Northern Fleet and protect every convoyChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P1/7 Sir Patrick Duffy21:48Channel convoys and North Sea ports face repeated mine-layingChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P1/7 Sir Patrick Duffy23:26Britain claims Atlantic and global roles while ordering no new escortNotable Point
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P1/7 Sir Patrick Duffy24:27Modern warships cannot substitute for presence everywhereNotable Point
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P1/7 Sir Patrick Duffy31:10Should Britain favor sea power over the NATO central front?Q&A
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P1/7 Sir Patrick Duffy33:23The NATO central front buys influence at a maritime opportunity costNotable Point
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P1/7 Sir Patrick Duffy42:12Labour defence links skilled work, NATO deterrence, and arms controlChapter
- Patreon 17 "The Royal Navy’s Strategic Role in 1980s NATO" as suggested by Joseph Sullivan13:35Patrick Duffy and the anatomy of a serious defence debateNotable Point
- Patreon 17 "The Royal Navy’s Strategic Role in 1980s NATO" as suggested by Joseph Sullivan22:14Measuring the Soviet Northern Fleet without alarmismChapter
- Patreon 17 "The Royal Navy’s Strategic Role in 1980s NATO" as suggested by Joseph Sullivan26:55Why NATO depended on Atlantic sea lanesChapter
- Patreon 17 "The Royal Navy’s Strategic Role in 1980s NATO" as suggested by Joseph Sullivan40:04Soviet submarines, NATO barriers, and scarce escortsChapter
- Patreon 17 "The Royal Navy’s Strategic Role in 1980s NATO" as suggested by Joseph Sullivan48:27Why France left NATO's integrated commandQ&A
- Patreon 17 "The Royal Navy’s Strategic Role in 1980s NATO" as suggested by Joseph Sullivan1:05:14Escorts, Central Europe, and the Polaris tradeoffQ&A
- Patreon 17 "The Royal Navy’s Strategic Role in 1980s NATO" as suggested by Joseph Sullivan1:36:50Gorshkov, Afghanistan, and NATO's global threat pictureChapter
- Patreon 17 "The Royal Navy’s Strategic Role in 1980s NATO" as suggested by Joseph Sullivan1:43:25How Southwest Asia strained NATO naval plansChapter
- Patreon 17 "The Royal Navy’s Strategic Role in 1980s NATO" as suggested by Joseph Sullivan1:49:22British control of Polaris within NATO strategyQ&A
- Patreon 17 "The Royal Navy’s Strategic Role in 1980s NATO" as suggested by Joseph Sullivan1:59:53Could European NATO navies operate beyond the treaty area?Q&A
- Patreon 17 "The Royal Navy’s Strategic Role in 1980s NATO" as suggested by Joseph Sullivan2:46:12A balanced fleet for alliances that can changeNotable Point
- Bruships 36: International Relations2:41:24Cable on independent foreign policy and seaborne tradeNotable Point
- Bruships 36: International Relations2:43:57How naval shrinkage can leave a fleet without a useful roleNotable Point
- Bruships 36: International Relations3:01:47Coordinating the Bosnia diplomatic shuttleChapter
- Bruships 36: International Relations3:03:28The difficulty of restarting NATO bombing after a pauseNotable Point
- Patreon 16: Royal Navy anti-piracy operations of the 1920s & 1930s in the Far East1:53:27Were NATO and EU anti-piracy task forces still active?Q&A
- Was Pearl Harbour a missed opportunity for the US?36:37Why alliance capacity is not the same as naval presenceQ&A
- Part 3 of 4 "The effect of the early jet age on naval warfare strategy/tactics?"15:44Soviet cruisers were designed to disperse NATO strengthChapter
- Bruships 26 - The Random Collection34:50How Britain sought an American commitment to Western EuropeChapter
- What if the 1956 Suez Crisis had gotten even hotter? (Long Patrol)2:22What would make Suez become a wider war?Chapter
- What if the 1956 Suez Crisis had gotten even hotter? (Long Patrol)11:54NATO was still a young institution in 1956Notable Point
- What if the 1956 Suez Crisis had gotten even hotter? (Long Patrol)29:29A Soviet strike could fracture alliance politicsChapter
- What if the 1956 Suez Crisis had gotten even hotter? (Long Patrol)31:28What Moscow could gain by interveningNotable Point
- What if the 1956 Suez Crisis had gotten even hotter? (Long Patrol)34:24Logistics could stop a European war before victoryNotable Point
- Bruships 24 - An Autobiography from War2:26:38NATO access and force planning before the Kosovo air campaignChapter
- Bruships 24 - An Autobiography from War2:27:35Macedonia's leverage over NATO access to KosovoNotable Point
- Patreon 9 – “Suez goes hot in 1956” by Martin Doherty14:34Why an American-Anglo-French Clash Was UnlikelyQ&A
- Patreon 9 – “Suez goes hot in 1956” by Martin Doherty28:14NATO, the Warsaw Pact, and the Middle EastChapter
- Patreon 9 – “Suez goes hot in 1956” by Martin Doherty1:04:28What Could NATO Have Done for Hungary in 1956?Q&A
- Patreon 9 – “Suez goes hot in 1956” by Martin Doherty2:02:20Why the Soviet Union Might Intervene at SuezChapter
- Patreon 9 – “Suez goes hot in 1956” by Martin Doherty2:05:10Soviet Intervention Would Reverse WashingtonNotable Point
- Patreon 9 – “Suez goes hot in 1956” by Martin Doherty2:12:41From Regional Bomber War to NATO Escalation and SettlementChapter
- Bru Ships Episode 20: Brasseys & Janes, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A3:18:20A High North and amphibious role for the Canadian NavyQ&A
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P6a Introduction to Patreon Video 48:42Empire as a security networkNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 15: Diplomacy & When it Fails, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:00:03Restraint at Pristina airportQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 15: Diplomacy & When it Fails, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:25:23Cold War defence against Bear bombers and cruise missilesQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 13: Weapons, Both Personal & Ship, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A49:26Alliances should share costs, not conceal force gapsQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 13: Weapons, Both Personal & Ship, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:00:15Why a multinational carrier remains difficultQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 13: Weapons, Both Personal & Ship, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:06:52NATO-wide modular warships and the StanFlex lessonQ&A
- 50th Proper Live Stream - Bru Ships Episode 10: Naval Warfare Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A3:21:30The scale of a combined NATO amphibious landingQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 9: Super Power Contest (as in the nations) Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:02:19A larger Soviet fleet changes NATO's problemQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 9: Super Power Contest (as in the nations) Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:41:58Why the E-7 Wedgetail looked like NATO's practical AWACS choiceQ&A
- 4000 Subscribers Thankyou Special – The Royal Navy if I were Prime Minister41:11National presence within allied collective strengthNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 4: Naval Aviation Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:43:47NATO logistics doctrine still needs practiced executionQ&A
- T he Altmark 80 Videos in Full1:10:45The incident's legacy for raiding and neutralityChapter
- Altmark Last Meeting with the Admiral Graf Spee - A River Plate 80 Video4:16Balancing combat strength with logisticsNotable Point