Why did parts of the United States oppose eliminating Britain's independent nuclear deterrent?
Short answerBecause US policymakers alternated between wanting controllable dependence and wanting capable allies that could defend themselves and share the burden.
NotesTwo contradictory American instincts shape the issue: allies should remain dependent and controllable, yet should also pay their way and provide meaningful military capability. Britain and France expose the tension because their independent deterrents add allied strength while limiting US control. Germany illustrates the reverse problem, having been reassured by US protection and then criticized for insufficient self-defence.