Related time notes
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live19:11Richelieu's wide range of preliminary designsQ&A
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:56:33An unrestricted British fast battleship and the gun-size raceQ&A
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:00:47Why Yamato's design logic depends on the treaty-era fleetNotable Point
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live22:22A British battleship with sixteen 14-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live39:25Four triple turrets as a battleship preferenceQ&A
- Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:49:15Why Britain preferred larger twin guns to an all-triple Iron DukeQ&A
- What happens if WWII took place as scheduled... after 1942? (Patreon)1:27:15H-class growth creates ships that are harder to build and supportNotable Point
- What happens if WWII took place as scheduled... after 1942? (Patreon)2:10:48Would Britain revive G3 or N3 directly?Q&A
- What happens if WWII took place as scheduled... after 1942? (Patreon)2:11:04What was the point of a German experimental 21-inch gun?Q&A
- What happens if WWII took place as scheduled... after 1942? (Patreon)2:52:42A hypothetical sixteen-gun British answer to YamatoNotable Point
- What happens if WWII took place as scheduled... after 1942? (Patreon)4:39:28What might follow Lyon in French large-gun studies?Q&A
- What happens if WWII took place as scheduled... after 1942? (Patreon)5:01:39Why very large multi-gun turrets are so difficultQ&A
- Bruships 254: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:45:23A game's 21-inch battleship guns and larger historical proposalsQ&A
- Bruships 253: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:18:31Choosing a German warship to preserveQ&A
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 22:12:15Why the United States would not build Design D for StalinQ&A
- The Perils of Standardisation: Can Navy's Standardise too much? (Patreon Premier)15:28What US battleship standardization left unexploredNotable Point
- Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:44:21Britain's 16.5-inch gun as the next design stepQ&A
- Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:08:45Lord Nelson's semi-dreadnought design studiesQ&A
- Bruships 245: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:02:00Why an export I3 might carry fewer gunsQ&A
- What happens if the entirety of the French Navy decides to carry on fighting in WWII? (Patreon Live)56:46French experience reduced quad-turret accuracy problemsQ&A
- What happens if the entirety of the French Navy decides to carry on fighting in WWII? (Patreon Live)1:57:41Strasbourg sits more clearly on the fast-battleship sideNotable Point
- Bruships 223: Naval History & Science Fiction Questions Answered Live...1:14:57Bismarck and the naval treaty systemNotable Point
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:29:59Designing an R-class counterpart to the Iowa classQ&A
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:48:57Why the Ludendorff super-battleship design fails scrutinyQ&A
- Exploring the meme: Top 5 & Bottom 5 inventions/systems of war that started in British Sheds(Live)24:55A light railway for hypothetical 22-inch battleship shellsNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle11:27Replacing Mutsu after an imagined 1930 magazine explosionQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle16:13Germany's paper response to British 18-inch capital shipsQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle7:58:26Where to look for early quadruple 12-inch gun proposalsQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…1:10:00What an early naval-treaty escalator clause changesQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…3:41:37Testing an F3-inspired alternative to King George VChapter
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…7:36:03The Lion class as Britain's Iowa equivalentQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…7:40:02Panama Canal limits versus British heavy-weather requirementsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II6:51:34The machinery risks inside the Lyon classQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II6:54:10Rearming a Danton with twelve-inch wing gunsQ&A
- Bruships 219: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:46:13Scaling the 16-inch/50 into a 15-inch naval gunQ&A
- Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:51:46Why V-1 launchers do not belong on ScharnhorstQ&A
- Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:55:16A Nelson-style Scharnhorst and the problem of retreating fireQ&A
- Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:43:36Six Bismarcks armed with V-2 rocketsQ&A
- Bruships 210: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:17:47Could triple 18-inch turrets fit an Iowa-class barbette?Q&A
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?14:55More guns help only while their shells can penetrateQ&A
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?42:26K3 and L3 combined nine 18-inch guns with different speed prioritiesNotable Point
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?1:33:13Iowa reused South Dakota's design to gain speed quicklyNotable Point
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?1:49:17A renewed battleship race would expose national bottlenecksChapter
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?1:51:29Italy could enlarge Littorio more easily than fund more hullsNotable Point
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?1:55:52Could Japan answer a renewed arms race with supercruisers?Q&A
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?2:00:10More North Carolinas offered a quick American responseQ&A
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?2:15:50Ersatz Monarch was tailored to control the AdriaticChapter
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?2:22:10Limited building could have kept battleship design evolvingNotable Point
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?7:42Which cancelled prewar dreadnought designs stand out?Q&A
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?11:41A fifteen-gun Dreadnought with centreline triple turretsNotable Point
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?13:41The triple-turret St Vincent alternativeChapter
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?20:36Why ambitious dreadnought studies became conservative shipsNotable Point
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?25:45The Royal Navy's recurring fast-battleship choiceChapter
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?27:25Why Queen Elizabeth traded two guns for speedChapter
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?51:13Why Francesco Caracciolo looked revolutionaryChapter
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?54:28Prewar American battleships put speed lastNotable Point
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?1:57:14How lighter components improved late-1920s battleship designsNotable Point
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?1:59:08How Hiraga searched for balanced treaty battleshipsNotable Point
- Bruships 206: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:31:00A heavier Revenge class could gain speedQ&A
- Why didn't the Royal Navy go for High Pressure boilers & what if they got 850psi boilers in 1934?30:58Machinery savings strengthen the Lion-class caseNotable Point
- Why didn't the Royal Navy go for High Pressure boilers & what if they got 850psi boilers in 1934?37:50A faster twelve-gun King George VNotable Point
- Why didn't the Royal Navy go for High Pressure boilers & what if they got 850psi boilers in 1934?58:24Japan and Italy face a new battleship speed floorChapter
- Bruships 198: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:45:54A stretched Scharnhorst with 15-inch guns was preferred to BismarckQ&A
- Bruships 198: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:23:48Early 16-inch/50 guns could reshape the Washington treatyQ&A
- Bruships 198: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:07:53A Japanese 510 mm gun was technically workableQ&A
- Bruships 198: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:09:42A secret 20-inch gun sacrifices deterrent valueNotable Point
- Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:56:09If 1980s Iowa-class battleships appeared in 1908Q&A
- Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:36:07Why treaty battleships studied 16-inch twin turretsQ&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...49:14Germany's options after a larger American gun jumpQ&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...51:08Would the proposed Agincourt have carried 18-inch guns?Q&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...54:46What would Yamato look like in an 18-inch treaty world?Q&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:05:57Could Nelson and Rodney be redesigned for 28 knots?Q&A
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:23:21The case for arming the Nelson class with improved 15-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 187: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:10:28Could Rio de Janeiro carry 15-inch and 9.2-inch guns?Q&A
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:19:13A faster Nelson with 15-inch gunsQ&A
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?49:45The plausible treaty: cap individual ships, not fleetsChapter
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?56:20Competition moves into speed and power densityNotable Point
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?1:02:34Italy can optimize for the Mediterranean but loses its qualitative escapeChapter
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?1:04:23A fixed limit helps the Navy Laws but forces German design compromisesChapter
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?1:06:03Russia's Ganguts fit the limit, but its global requirements do notNotable Point
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?1:09:44Dreadnought growth quickly outpaces the treaty limitChapter
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?1:13:33Warship exports create a non-signatory loopholeNotable Point
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?1:14:28Displacement evasions would erode the treatyChapter
- Bruships 177: New Year, same Dr Alex... possibly with new gym membership3:07:21The uncertain paper trail for a French 18-inch-gun battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?30:41Reading the fictional battleship in Indiana Jones and the Great CircleQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?38:18What the Royal Navy's 18-inch guns may implyQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?51:50A Queen Elizabeth with twenty 11-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?1:15:48An 18-inch Hood could break the historical treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?3:39:54When Japan would need a 20-inch YamatoQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?3:59:10France designs against Littorio, not a weaker BismarckQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?4:29:30Why the Royal Navy did not adopt triple turrets earlierQ&A
- The Backbone of Royal Navy Interwar Aviation, HMS Eagle(1918)! Key Ship Series 6 Ship 748:28How treaty-era industrial contraction favored quadruple turretsNotable Point
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!2:10:34A 45,000-ton Washington treaty reshapes battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!2:28:59If the G3 battlecruisers reached serviceQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!4:20:02Early US 16-inch guns accelerate the battleship raceQ&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song3:32:00What limits the length of a 20-inch gun barrelQ&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song3:52:46A more capable Nelson-class design through the F3 alternativeQ&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song4:22:07New hulls for Queen Elizabeth and Revenge turrets would become VanguardsQ&A
- Bruships 167: Tell me why, everything turned book – packing up, stacking up is all kalax want to do.1:34:25What a K25 design study is meant to showQ&A
- Bruships 167: Tell me why, everything turned book – packing up, stacking up is all kalax want to do.2:24:16Turbine battleships without the Dreadnought revolutionQ&A
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....1:24:24KGV turret rings and progressive upgunningQ&A
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....2:10:35Argentine battleships with heavy secondariesQ&A
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....2:42:43Small-tube boilers for Queen ElizabethQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?1:38:32North Carolina with an all-forward F3 layoutQ&A
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign15:48Dunkerque, Richelieu, and France's two-theater problemQ&A
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:13:43Tillman designs and a qualitative arms raceQ&A
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:55:17British 16.5-inch guns and the Washington treatyQ&A
- Patreon 102: Zeroes over the Med! Japan joins the Britain & Free powers on 25th of June 1940...3:16:23Would Vanguard still be built after N3 and G3?Q&A
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built29:37Fitting three superfiring twin turrets forward on a battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built37:22Why spare 15-inch turrets defined HMS VanguardQ&A
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built1:10:46What might follow the 1920 South Dakota classQ&A
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built1:49:58Designing an 80,000-ton battleship for shallow waterQ&A
- Carriers of the Kaiserlichemarine: the WWI potential of German Naval Aviation9:44Why two naval races carried different strategic risksNotable Point
- Giulio Cesare: The Lucky Ceasar of the Regia Marina, Key Ships Series 8 – Ship 56:53From Conte di Cavour to Andrea Doria and Francesco CaraccioloNotable Point
- Giulio Cesare: The Lucky Ceasar of the Regia Marina, Key Ships Series 8 – Ship 519:39The Conte di Cavour class as originally builtChapter
- Giulio Cesare: The Lucky Ceasar of the Regia Marina, Key Ships Series 8 – Ship 528:58Italy at the center of a qualitative dreadnought raceNotable Point
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered6:41How Battenberg's battleships could reshape WashingtonNotable Point
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered34:00Why an all-aft battleship battery is a poor signalQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered1:38:58Why Britain preferred more battleships to more guns per hullQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered3:49:32How the Gangut class compared with contemporary dreadnoughtsQ&A
- Check Campaign 8: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign27:16A Lion-class major refit balances armor and firepowerChapter
- Check Campaign 8: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign38:22Keeping a fast battleship at 32 knotsNotable Point
- Check Campaign 8: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign48:18The campaign fleet ignores Washington treaty limitsNotable Point
- Check Campaign 8: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign48:46British and American battleship guns reach different balance pointsNotable Point
- Check Campaign 8: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:32:56A Rodney-hulled super-battleship escorts itselfChapter
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!16:11Why Dreadnought did not use superfiring turretsQ&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!2:43:30Why a super-battleship still benefits from 6-inch secondariesQ&A
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty1:26:09A higher Allied baseline pressures Yamato and the AxisChapter
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...2:37:04A longer F3-style hull separates magazines from machineryNotable Point
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...3:03:15All-forward guns save weight but concentrate riskQ&A
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...3:13:00Soviet battleships depend on foreign technical linksNotable Point
- Check Campaign 5: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:14:25Designing the 32-knot Canada-class battleshipChapter
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time1:58:28Fisher with future design histories builds a frightening DreadnoughtQ&A
- Patreon 94: The different types of Aircraft Carriers/Seaplane Carriers/Hybrids2:37:47Why battleships abandoned five main turretsQ&A
- Patreon 94: The different types of Aircraft Carriers/Seaplane Carriers/Hybrids2:39:42Would a faster Revenge class become much heavier?Q&A
- The Philosophy behind Autoloader Development for Navies41:24Balancing shell power against volume of fireNotable Point
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History1:00:20Three rounds per minute could transform a treaty battleshipNotable Point
- HMS Warspite: The Survivor - KSS3 S3 Comment Response17:00How reconstruction reshaped battleship appearanceNotable Point
- The Royal Navys Response to a 1906 Dante Alighieri2:42Reconstructing Dante Alighieri's designChapter
- The Royal Navys Response to a 1906 Dante Alighieri41:45Triple turrets become the mark of the new battleshipChapter
- The Royal Navys Response to a 1906 Dante Alighieri1:05:42Why the simulation adds deck armour, not belt armourNotable Point
- The Royal Navys Response to a 1906 Dante Alighieri1:16:22Six-inch secondaries decide the simulated actionChapter
- The Royal Navys Response to a 1906 Dante Alighieri1:34:33Machinery spaces separate the main magazinesNotable Point
- Tillman Class: Dreams of Super Battleships - KSS2 S8 Comment Response0:39How Tillman IV-2 fits fifteen 18-inch gunsQ&A
- Tillman Class: Dreams of Super Battleships - KSS2 S8 Comment Response7:20Panama Canal locks define the Tillman design envelopeQ&A
- Tillman Class: Dreams of Super Battleships - KSS2 S8 Comment Response22:09Why the Tillman studies deserve serious attentionNotable Point
- Tillman Class: Dreams of Super Battleships - KSS2 S8 Comment Response25:09Assessing Tillman III's underwater protectionQ&A
- Bruships 131: Battleships...19:29Dockyard limits behind interwar British battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships 131: Battleships...44:28Why Littorio was more efficient than BismarckQ&A
- Bruships 131: Battleships...46:36Would autoloaders favour 18- or 20-inch guns?Q&A
- Bruships 131: Battleships...56:41Why twelve guns help a battleship engage two targetsQ&A
- Bruships 131: Battleships...1:10:49The updated Nelson alternative to King George VQ&A
- Bruships 131: Battleships...1:30:30How a faster, heavier Dreadnought changes the arms raceQ&A
- Bruships 131: Battleships...2:08:30Warships After London on torpedo protectionChapter
- Battle of Tsushima: Fleets at War1:12:54Oslyabya showed the cost of a second-class battleshipChapter
- Battle of Tsushima: Fleets at War1:17:35Second-class battleship savings bought no tactical escapeNotable Point
- Battle of Tsushima: Fleets at War1:35:24Imperator Nikolai I grew heavier while losing protectionNotable Point
- Bruships 129: Travels, Rememberance & Questions from Chat1:05:28The US Navy considered an all-aft batteryQ&A
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 920:59Balancing a fast heavy-gun battleship designChapter
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 928:59Finishing Thunder's secondary battery and protectionChapter
- HMS Lord Nelson(1906): Britain's Last Soverign Style Battleship - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 552:28If long-range fire control had failedNotable Point
- HMS Formidable(1898): Lessons of a Highly Conventional Carreer - Key Ship Series 6, Ship 40:42HMS Formidable as incremental battleship developmentChapter
- HMS Formidable(1898): Lessons of a Highly Conventional Carreer - Key Ship Series 6, Ship 44:54Why call Formidable a sovereign battleship?Notable Point
- HMS Formidable(1898): Lessons of a Highly Conventional Carreer - Key Ship Series 6, Ship 414:19Protection, machinery, and endurance in the Formidable designChapter
- Ranging & Stabilising: How Gunnery Evolved from 1860 to 19601:14:39Battleship speed and bow shape served the gunsNotable Point
- USS North Dakota(BB-29): The USN's First True Dreadnought - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 88:55North Dakota's hull lines as a statement of national powerNotable Point
- USS North Dakota(BB-29): The USN's First True Dreadnought - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 818:32Machinery layout, turret placement, and magazine heatNotable Point
- USS North Dakota(BB-29): The USN's First True Dreadnought - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 823:20What North Dakota's trial figures imply about unrealized speedNotable Point
- USS North Dakota(BB-29): The USN's First True Dreadnought - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 837:28Could a failed North Dakota have delayed the turbine navy?Notable Point
- King George V(1911) Class: Why the Orion Class didn't stick as 'Super Dreadnoughts'1:43How boiler choice limited the Queen Elizabeths' speed goalNotable Point
- King George V(1911) Class: Why the Orion Class didn't stick as 'Super Dreadnoughts'9:50The archetypal dreadnought silhouetteNotable Point
- King George V(1911) Class: Why the Orion Class didn't stick as 'Super Dreadnoughts'13:48A scaled-up Orion: machinery, range, armament, and armourChapter
- King George V(1911) Class: Why the Orion Class didn't stick as 'Super Dreadnoughts'18:26Why marginal stability mattered to long-range gunneryNotable Point
- King George V(1911) Class: Why the Orion Class didn't stick as 'Super Dreadnoughts'25:13Battleship appearance as naval diplomacyNotable Point
- King George V(1911) Class: Why the Orion Class didn't stick as 'Super Dreadnoughts'34:17The class's legacy: a practical model of what a battleship needed to beNotable Point
- Alsace class: France Building Back - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 97:11Gascogne as the bridge to AlsaceChapter
- Alsace class: France Building Back - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 912:53Quadruple turrets: salvo weight and riskNotable Point
- Alsace class: France Building Back - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 926:17Choosing shell weight or volume of fireNotable Point
- Alsace class: France Building Back - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 935:15Why the simulated battleships use heavy barbette armourQ&A
- Alsace class: France Building Back - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 946:06What a one-on-one simulation can and cannot showNotable Point
- H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 48:14Prestige turns a practical design into escalationNotable Point
- H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 415:48Bigger hulls require bigger yards and docksNotable Point
- H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 419:10Why split secondary batteries consume a shipNotable Point
- H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 431:13Atlantic and Baltic demands pull the hull apartNotable Point
- H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 443:23H-39 as the practical German limitNotable Point
- H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 450:42Why H-44's displacement is not simply fantasyNotable Point
- The Navigation Acts (1651/1660/1663/1670/1673/1696/1733/1764)1:59:41Why game-AI handling sinks a Montana designNotable Point
- Testing out Lion Class & Potential Lion Class Successors on UAD2:02Gun elevation changes Yamato's practical rangeNotable Point
- Testing out Lion Class & Potential Lion Class Successors on UAD24:47An off-the-shelf Lion successor with quadruple turretsNotable Point
- Testing out Lion Class & Potential Lion Class Successors on UAD26:39Why Nelson and Rodney look so unusualQ&A
- Testing out Lion Class & Potential Lion Class Successors on UAD28:46Favourite ships open two revealing design counterfactualsQ&A
- Testing out Lion Class & Potential Lion Class Successors on UAD36:22Building a 36-knot battlecruiser around its missionChapter
- Testing out Lion Class & Potential Lion Class Successors on UAD56:23A game can overvalue turtleback armourNotable Point
- Testing out Lion Class & Potential Lion Class Successors on UAD1:05:47Armour distribution affects stability as well as protectionNotable Point
- Testing out Lion Class & Potential Lion Class Successors on UAD1:11:32Long-range fighting changes the protection schemeNotable Point
- Testing Out Soviet Battleship Designs...2:44A plausible Soviet capital ship for 1935Chapter
- Testing Out Soviet Battleship Designs...19:23Why the first Soviet silhouette looks wrongNotable Point
- Testing Out Soviet Battleship Designs...26:47Why a British G3 hull fits the Soviet conceptNotable Point
- Testing Out Soviet Battleship Designs...30:07Rebuilding the Soviet battleship around 1930 constraintsChapter
- Testing Out Soviet Battleship Designs...40:23Ambition versus a buildable Soviet battle fleetNotable Point
- Testing Out Soviet Battleship Designs...47:38Building a 15-inch alternative to King George VChapter
- Modern Gun Tech: What would WWII style battleship & cruiser guns look like with modern technology?5:23Why extreme battleship-gun elevation offers little valueNotable Point
- Modern Gun Tech: What would WWII style battleship & cruiser guns look like with modern technology?32:34The sixteen-gun automatic 14-inch counterfactualChapter
- Modern Gun Tech: What would WWII style battleship & cruiser guns look like with modern technology?44:24A 14-inch advantage only lasts while rivals lagNotable Point
- Testing Sixteen Autoloaded 14in Gun Battleship (Chatfield's Dream) to Destruction2:17A 16-gun autoloading battleship testChapter
- Testing Sixteen Autoloaded 14in Gun Battleship (Chatfield's Dream) to Destruction8:30What rapid-firing heavy guns would changeNotable Point
- Testing Sixteen Autoloaded 14in Gun Battleship (Chatfield's Dream) to Destruction13:43Why the secondary battery can decide the fightNotable Point
- Testing Sixteen Autoloaded 14in Gun Battleship (Chatfield's Dream) to Destruction30:33A controlled test against older battle squadronsChapter
- Testing Sixteen Autoloaded 14in Gun Battleship (Chatfield's Dream) to Destruction39:32Why closing range wastes a technical advantageNotable Point
- Testing Sixteen Autoloaded 14in Gun Battleship (Chatfield's Dream) to Destruction1:02:26Speed controls when the enemy can fightNotable Point
- Testing Sixteen Autoloaded 14in Gun Battleship (Chatfield's Dream) to Destruction1:23:06Magazine depth sets the practical limitChapter
- Testing Sixteen Autoloaded 14in Gun Battleship (Chatfield's Dream) to Destruction1:39:09Testing forty years of technology against numbersChapter
- Testing Sixteen Autoloaded 14in Gun Battleship (Chatfield's Dream) to Destruction1:54:02Why the larger autoloading gun still mattersQ&A
- Testing Sixteen Autoloaded 14in Gun Battleship (Chatfield's Dream) to Destruction2:03:25Keeping a naval simulation tied to real designsQ&A
- Testing out my Spanish Dreadnought Designs1:54Reimagining Dreadnought with triple 14-inch turretsChapter
- Testing out my Spanish Dreadnought Designs9:17Repairing a Spanish dreadnought designNotable Point
- Testing out my Spanish Dreadnought Designs30:15A modern Spanish battleship and national design identityNotable Point
- Testing out my Spanish Dreadnought Designs54:03The Colossus and the limits of maximum battleship designNotable Point
- Testing out my Spanish Dreadnought Designs1:10:41Building an Italian 1920 battleshipChapter
- Testing out my Spanish Dreadnought Designs1:30:41Torpedo range, fire control, and ammunition enduranceNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)1:13What made a dreadnought differentChapter
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)2:26When older machinery improved global supportNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)3:46Lissa's legacy in Dreadnought's turret layoutNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)7:21How turbines helped control the rangeNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)9:22Armour as a clue to battle rangeNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)12:30Why pre-dreadnought is a retrospective labelNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)17:29Dreadnought generations and moving benchmarksNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)23:13Wyoming's aft turrets reveal a broadside designNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)24:32Why battle lines needed common performanceNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)26:26Why the Tegetthoff class mattered as a standing threatNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)39:25Big guns, numbers, and deterrenceChapter
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)46:28America's oceans favoured a slower defensive battle lineNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)49:29British gun calibres and controlled escalationNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)51:43The more extreme Queen Elizabeth Britain could have builtNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts (1905-1914)57:22Why Italy stepped back from twelve 15-inch gunsNotable Point
- Some Books Aquired So Far in #NavHistAus23! Sydney1:28:07Why a British battleship successor depends on foreign programmesQ&A
- USS Texas: Key Ship Series 3, Ship 216:17Twin turrets, reliable machinery, and upgrade potentialNotable Point
- Günther Lütjens, useful idiot or misunderstood leadership?2:04:24Could new boilers have made the Nelson class much faster?Q&A
- Günther Lütjens, useful idiot or misunderstood leadership?2:21:02Would a third shaft for Nelson and Rodney have required thinner armour?Q&A
- A 13.5in gun Dreadnought? Would it work?0:49Designing a 13.5-inch-gun dreadnoughtChapter
- A 13.5in gun Dreadnought? Would it work?19:05Speed, spotting, and gun rangeNotable Point
- A 13.5in gun Dreadnought? Would it work?30:33Escaping wing turrets on an early dreadnought hullNotable Point
- A 13.5in gun Dreadnought? Would it work?32:42An all-centreline 13.5-inch dreadnought experimentChapter
- A 13.5in gun Dreadnought? Would it work?54:12Reworking G3 and F3 capital-ship ideasChapter
- A 13.5in gun Dreadnought? Would it work?1:10:03Layered belt armour and where shells detonateNotable Point
- A 13.5in gun Dreadnought? Would it work?1:12:10A French all-forward capital-ship conceptChapter
- A 13.5in gun Dreadnought? Would it work?1:40:04Yamato's protection and secondary batteryNotable Point
- A 13.5in gun Dreadnought? Would it work?2:15:28Turret penetration as a gateway to the magazinesNotable Point
- Sovereign Battleships... & Why Pre-Dreadnoughts really shouldn't be called that Round 26:34Royal Sovereigns as a practical transitionChapter
- Sovereign Battleships... & Why Pre-Dreadnoughts really shouldn't be called that Round 28:45The 13.5-inch alternative to Dreadnought's gunsNotable Point
- Sovereign Battleships... & Why Pre-Dreadnoughts really shouldn't be called that Round 219:40Sissoi Veliky, overload, and TsushimaNotable Point
- Sovereign Battleships... & Why Pre-Dreadnoughts really shouldn't be called that Round 223:27Continuous construction and evolutionary designChapter
- Sovereign Battleships... & Why Pre-Dreadnoughts really shouldn't be called that Round 246:35Virginia’s superimposed-turret trade-offNotable Point
- Sovereign Battleships... & Why Pre-Dreadnoughts really shouldn't be called that Round 250:39Deutschlands and conservative German designChapter
- Sovereign Battleships... & Why Pre-Dreadnoughts really shouldn't be called that Round 256:28Lord Nelsons as insurance for DreadnoughtNotable Point
- Sovereign Battleships... & Why Pre-Dreadnoughts really shouldn't be called that Round 258:21Small classes for innovation, large classes for confidenceNotable Point
- Patreon 79: AH - WW1 incidents happen that bring the US enters war on the side of Germany...36:51Why Dreadnought was more transformative than South CarolinaNotable Point
- Patreon 79: AH - WW1 incidents happen that bring the US enters war on the side of Germany...55:55The Delaware class turned an early dreadnought idea into a larger fleet unitNotable Point
- Patreon 79: AH - WW1 incidents happen that bring the US enters war on the side of Germany...1:25:55Different machinery complicated battleship division planningQ&A
- Patreon 79: AH - WW1 incidents happen that bring the US enters war on the side of Germany...1:46:52Wyoming packed twelve guns into a slow turret farmNotable Point
- Patreon 79: AH - WW1 incidents happen that bring the US enters war on the side of Germany...2:00:39Twin screws made battle damage more consequentialNotable Point
- Patreon 79: AH - WW1 incidents happen that bring the US enters war on the side of Germany...2:07:29Nevada and Oklahoma were under thirty at Pearl HarborNotable Point
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done1:16:21Treaty tonnage made 14-inch quadruple turrets attractiveNotable Point
- HMS Dreadnought, but built around the RN's favourite battleship guns...7:37Designing a 13.5-inch-gun HMS DreadnoughtNotable Point
- HMS Dreadnought, but built around the RN's favourite battleship guns...12:48Would Fisher pursue triple, superfiring 13.5-inch guns?Q&A
- HMS Dreadnought, but built around the RN's favourite battleship guns...14:35Dreadnought hull balance, roll and persistent pitchNotable Point
- HMS Dreadnought, but built around the RN's favourite battleship guns...25:37Orion's armour as a check on the Dreadnought game designNotable Point
- HMS Dreadnought, but built around the RN's favourite battleship guns...31:40The French response and the cost of dreadnought design lagNotable Point
- HMS Dreadnought, but built around the RN's favourite battleship guns...42:59What a 10-inch treaty cruiser would changeQ&A
- HMS Dreadnought, but built around the RN's favourite battleship guns...2:07:03Designing an 18-inch super-battleshipNotable Point
- HMS Dreadnought, but built around the RN's favourite battleship guns...2:28:58The super-battleship's layers of gun rangeNotable Point
- HMS Dreadnought, but built around the RN's favourite battleship guns...2:33:56Triple-turret development and the set-back centre gunNotable Point
- HMS Dreadnought, but built around the RN's favourite battleship guns...2:36:11Firing delays, turret access and maintenanceQ&A
- Steam Battleships (1876-1891)40:47Re Umberto and Italy’s near-miss battleship designNotable Point
- HMS Benbow 1885: Key Ships Series 1, Ship 35:09Why Benbow was not an ordinary AdmiralChapter
- HMS Benbow 1885: Key Ships Series 1, Ship 38:15Why the Admiral class was not one uniform designNotable Point
- HMS Benbow 1885: Key Ships Series 1, Ship 38:50Machinery, dimensions, and forced-draught speedNotable Point
- HMS Benbow 1885: Key Ships Series 1, Ship 312:20What Benbow’s 18 inches of armour can and cannot meanChapter
- HMS Benbow 1885: Key Ships Series 1, Ship 314:39A plan view built for close-range brawlingNotable Point
- HMS Benbow 1885: Key Ships Series 1, Ship 316:06How quickly the Royal Sovereigns eclipsed BenbowChapter
- HMS Dreadnought: Key Ships Series 1, Ship 14:22How superfiring and triple turrets might have changed DreadnoughtNotable Point
- HMS Dreadnought: Key Ships Series 1, Ship 16:38Wing turrets and Fisher's forward-fire priorityNotable Point
- HMS Dreadnought: Key Ships Series 1, Ship 111:26Why steam turbines were central to DreadnoughtNotable Point
- HMS Dreadnought: Key Ships Series 1, Ship 113:03Displacement, turbine machinery, speed, and rangeChapter
- HMS Dreadnought: Key Ships Series 1, Ship 117:01Dreadnought as a bundle of combat capabilitiesNotable Point
- Turret Selection: What in What Distribution Makes Sense for you5:24Turret selection as a whole-ship design problemChapter
- Turret Selection: What in What Distribution Makes Sense for you9:35Why two all-forward quadruple turrets concentrate riskNotable Point
- Turret Selection: What in What Distribution Makes Sense for you22:31Magazine separation versus a concentrated batteryNotable Point
- Turret Selection: What in What Distribution Makes Sense for you25:30The maintenance cost of concentrating guns in one turretNotable Point
- Turret Selection: What in What Distribution Makes Sense for you32:08Five twin turrets limit the loss from one hitNotable Point
- Turret Selection: What in What Distribution Makes Sense for you39:48Standardized twin turrets simplify Royal Navy supportChapter
- Turret Selection: What in What Distribution Makes Sense for you42:19Three questions before adding more turretsNotable Point
- Turret Selection: What in What Distribution Makes Sense for you52:33Designing a battleship to keep fighting after damageChapter
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas2:29Inspecting the Queen Elizabeth MaximusChapter
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas5:01Building Germany's maximum 1912 counterpartChapter
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas7:01Restoring a plausible German torpedo and gun batteryNotable Point
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas12:19Why is the German design heavier to port?Q&A
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas15:08Fire control and the Kiel Canal shape the German maximumNotable Point
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas20:57Scaling speed and armour for a maximum Queen ElizabethNotable Point
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas24:33Why British and German capital ships divergedNotable Point
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas41:10Redesigning protection and secondaries after the failed trialChapter
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas44:08Six-inch secondaries and three-inch anti-aircraft gunsNotable Point
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas49:47When historical battleship designs meet game AINotable Point
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas50:44Preserving main-battery arcs around the secondariesNotable Point
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas57:20Why Skoda triple turrets strain the German counterfactualNotable Point
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas58:43The trade-off between 16.5-inch and 18-inch gunsNotable Point
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas1:03:59Small-calibre hits expose the fire-control systemNotable Point
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas1:27:12Scaling armour for an 18-inch AgincourtChapter
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas1:36:29German limits in an 18-inch-gun worldChapter
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas1:43:40Testing Bismarck's speed, range, and canal limitsNotable Point
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas2:13:46How an 18-inch prewar flagship could reshape the naval raceNotable Point
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas2:14:55Reconstructing Yamato for the comparisonChapter
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas2:31:12Four twin turrets or three triples?Notable Point
- Empire Total War Twitch Stream 2(February 2023)24:23Queen Elizabeth-class design alternativesNotable Point
- Bruships 92: New Books, Naval Chat and Late 19th Century Warships...2:08:22Why British big-gun studies gravitated toward 16.5 inchesQ&A
- Brooklyn Class: The Not Quite Last US Treaty Era Cruisers7:03Why Brooklyn's firing arcs make less sense for Nelson and RodneyNotable Point
- Patreon 62: What If The French Navy in 1940 Fought On?29:03Dunkerque speed versus four Richelieu-class shipsQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 216:26Why the Brandenburg class mixed 11-inch gun lengthsQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 216:52A practical Japanese alternative to YamatoQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 237:40Vanguard and the replacement of aging battlecruisersQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 22:03:35Early composite armor in battleship designQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 22:07:18Why a huge battleship might still carry nine gunsQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-4041:23An alternative turret arrangement for the Nelson classQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-4057:13How larger battleship guns reduce the practical batteryQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-401:09:54Why quadruple turrets approach the practical barrel limitQ&A
- Bruships 84: Science Fiction Strikes Again13:09Would Hood destroying Bismarck cancel HMS Vanguard?Q&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 233:29How Caracciolo completion could enlarge the Littorio classQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 22:34:13Why N3 inherited an awkward midships turretQ&A
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)24:53King George V armament and the 15-inch alternativeNotable Point
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)46:03Treaty limits for a twenty-capital-ship fleetChapter
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)1:03:12UAD British and German treaty battleship designsChapter
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)1:09:28All-forward armament concentrates damage riskNotable Point
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)1:15:38German heavy-gun development under the treatyNotable Point
- Galaxy Class: A Naval Historian's view of Federation Cruisers & Ships of the 24th Century (Live)3:22:13Are five triple 15-inch turrets too much for a G3 hull?Q&A
- County Cruisers P8: The County Class in War and Retrospect (Long Patrol)40:25Why Dreadnought's revolution stopped shortNotable Point
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)2:28Designing a 1926 all-forward fast battleshipChapter
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)8:46Cutting weight without abandoning the battleship conceptNotable Point
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)15:34Building an explicitly ahistorical Spanish opponentChapter
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)49:38Simulation results expose the cost of design compromisesNotable Point
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)5:25A wide-beam, fast 1914 British battleship experimentChapter
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)17:38Machinery, protection, and secondary-armament trade-offsNotable Point
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)23:31Building the German counterpart with different assumptionsChapter
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)36:18All-forward armament and battleship weight distributionNotable Point
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)40:36Funnel placement, weight offset, and armour distributionNotable Point
- The 614th Running the Gauntlet: Six Books Reviewed (Long Patrol)7:10H-class battleships and the risks of paper designNotable Point
- Battle of Singapore Straits (Equitable Washington Treaty Scenario): A UAD Infused(Long Patrol)33:50Balancing firepower, armour and speedNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)2:44A 42,000-ton capital-ship ceilingNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)23:50Smaller battleships for French and Italian fleetsNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)30:29A Royal Navy of early fast battleshipsNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)45:00Modelling a Kii-based Japanese battleshipNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)48:21American firepower at the cost of speedNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)1:15:06Range, speed, and American machineryNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)1:21:28What the simulated fleet action showsChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)1:22:10How the British design changes the comparisonNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)1:24:39A workable ceiling rewards naval constructorsNotable Point
- A Rumble in the Tumble: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)35:40The pre-dreadnought as a floating fortressChapter
- Anglo Japanese War: If Tsingtao caused a war in January 1939 (Comment Response)21:52Why propose a 40,000-ton treaty limit?Q&A
- Battle of the Aegates (241BC)2:40:37How a wider Panama Canal could change battleship hullsQ&A
- Siege of Corfu (1798–1799): 223 yrs ago today3:02:02Could infrastructure support a 100,000-ton Super Lion?Q&A
- Siege of Corfu (1798–1799): 223 yrs ago today3:13:04Would Super Lion need a larger anti-aircraft battery?Q&A
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment2:29:03Why Nelson's third turret was not superfiringQ&A
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment2:31:35New Jersey versus Yamato in a one-on-one fightQ&A
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment2:43:00Why quadruple 16-inch turrets create punishing design tradeoffsQ&A
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment2:44:09A treaty-compliant redesign of the Nagato classQ&A
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment3:06:26Why battleship designers adopted triple turretsQ&A
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment3:31:42A fee-based alternative to Washington Treaty ship limitsQ&A
- Bruships 71: Hobbs on the Fleet Air Arm in Europe & Other cool books44:25When more 14-inch guns still lose to twelve 16-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 69: The Decider21:57Why the 1944 Lion design changed its secondary batteryQ&A
- Bruships 69: The Decider35:36Why Lion would not simply reuse Nelson’s turretsQ&A
- Bruships 69: The Decider1:10:14The central battery logic of pre-dreadnoughtsQ&A
- Bruships 69: The Decider2:02:02A 14-inch Dreadnought accelerates the gun-calibre ladderQ&A
- Patreon 43: "Unverified stories of Norwegian Campaign: Tall Tales of Tribals"1:48:04How fixed underwater torpedo tubes were aimedQ&A
- Patreon 43: "Unverified stories of Norwegian Campaign: Tall Tales of Tribals"1:57:17What 16-inch guns might have changed for the King George V classQ&A
- Patreon 43: "Unverified stories of Norwegian Campaign: Tall Tales of Tribals"1:58:49How Fisher might react to future battleship plans in 1913Q&A
- Patreon 43: "Unverified stories of Norwegian Campaign: Tall Tales of Tribals"2:12:14Hood and Bismarck compared by displacement efficiencyQ&A
- Patreon 42: "Recovering from Disaster: The Imperial Russian Navy between Russo-Japanese War & WW1."1:32:42Gangut: innovative layout, limited strategic marginNotable Point
- Patreon 42: "Recovering from Disaster: The Imperial Russian Navy between Russo-Japanese War & WW1."2:18:32Imperator Nikolai I showed a maturing Russian battleship designChapter
- Patreon 42: "Recovering from Disaster: The Imperial Russian Navy between Russo-Japanese War & WW1."2:26:16Russian dreadnoughts had room for larger gun mountingsNotable Point
- Patreon 42: "Recovering from Disaster: The Imperial Russian Navy between Russo-Japanese War & WW1."2:51:39Russian turret layouts left unusual room for modernizationNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (10)2:52:05How Britain and America might answer early Yamato plansQ&A
- Bruships 65: Naval History Books & Questions Answered1:36:15Vickers' imagined twelve-gun fast battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 65: Naval History Books & Questions Answered1:44:36The Royal Navy's early triple-turret programmeQ&A
- Bruships 65: Naval History Books & Questions Answered3:14:48Treaty weight and the King George V class's wet bowQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)2:13:38Triple turrets could become standard after DreadnoughtQ&A
- Trafalgar to Dreadnought: A Century in Fifteen Ships and Battles2:10:41Which later battleship might Fisher have preferred?Q&A
- Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat9:32An earlier Dreadnought with 14-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat40:16Why triple turrets do not fit an accelerated DreadnoughtQ&A
- Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat1:03:39Turning Nelson into a faster economical battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat3:36:32Why giant Japanese battleships were limited by machinery and turretsQ&A
- Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat4:41:19The Lord Nelson class arrived after DreadnoughtQ&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…1:13:55How earlier 18-inch battleships might alter YamatoQ&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…1:18:35Why 18 inches approaches the practical limit for battleship gunsQ&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…1:20:53Why Yamato was not designed to fight two IowasQ&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…2:25:41Why the Alaska class was not a capital shipQ&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…2:28:35Tillman IV versus YamatoQ&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…2:49:39Why German battleships miss the top fiveQ&A
- Bruships 56: "Walking Softly & Carrying a Big Stick" - Admirals, Diplomacy & Detterence2:43:23Britain could answer H-44 with volume rather than caliberQ&A
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 4/11 What Dreadnought Obscures2:31Minas Geraes: armour and turret layoutNotable Point
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 4/11 What Dreadnought Obscures8:14Delaware's centerline battery and missed speedNotable Point
- Bruships 55: New Books2:13:35Comparing the King George V class's 14-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 55: New Books4:52:18How a different German fleet might have changed British battleship prioritiesNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (3)3:13:07King George V without treaty restrictionsQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (3)3:44:51Inclined armor follows the expected battleQ&A
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): Part 3 190710:23The Nassau class blurs the dreadnought divideChapter
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): Part 3 190724:45Turret count does not determine broadside powerNotable Point
- The Great White Fleet1:08:46A provisional answer about an Italian 17-inch battleshipQ&A
- The Great White Fleet1:32:40British and French influence on American warship designNotable Point
- The Great White Fleet2:04:53Sea-keeping and crew lessons reshaped American battleshipsChapter
- The Great White Fleet2:09:15How wet were Wyoming's forward gun positions?Q&A
- The Great White Fleet2:12:51Why American battleships carried lattice mastsQ&A
- Steel of a Hundred Years Ago: Ships of 19201:36:11The doubtful logic of US Navy cage mastsQ&A
- Steel of a Hundred Years Ago: Ships of 19202:39:34Royal Navy turret naming conventionsQ&A
- Steel of a Hundred Years Ago: Ships of 19202:45:16Trading Nelson's torpedoes for power and layoutQ&A
- Battle of Taranto - a Stringbag Strike from the Dark35:34Pugliese protection and the danger of a stationary targetNotable Point
- Bruships 24 - An Autobiography from War3:50:39Is a 20-inch naval gun feasible?Q&A
- Patreon Video 4: Tsingtao 1939 Goes Hot...2:25:11Hood was not simply the next RenownQ&A
- Patreon Video 4: Tsingtao 1939 Goes Hot...3:05:24How Pacific combat could reshape the Lion successorsQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 15: Diplomacy & When it Fails, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:03:04How small hull changes could improve VanguardQ&A