How should the Lord Nelson-class pre-dreadnoughts be judged?
Short answerThey were reliable and generally good ships, but commissioned after Dreadnought and carried an unnecessarily awkward secondary-turret arrangement.
NotesThe Lord Nelson class consisted of good, dependable ships rather than failed pre-dreadnoughts. Their historical irony is that the last British examples of the type commissioned after HMS Dreadnought had already changed the battleship standard. The secondary battery's combination of forward single turrets and other twin mountings is difficult to justify. The single mounts added complexity without delivering a clear operational benefit, illustrating how a sound ship can still preserve an awkward design compromise.