Related time notes
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:47:23Town cruisers and Renown imagined with modern weaponsQ&A
- Rise of the Frigate Navies: Why so many nations are going Frigate and why others want them as well!1:38:42Type 83 and the consequences of an occupied shipyardNotable Point
- Bruships 265: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:43:43Destroyer replacement schedules and life-extension riskNotable Point
- Bruships 265: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:38:06Choosing an unbuilt warship with maintenance providedQ&A
- Bruships 265: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:15:59An enlarged Type 45 as a Type 83 starting pointQ&A
- Britain's Rearmament 1937 vs 2026: What Lessons are we forgetting?1:13:14Type 83 and the shipyard timetable behind programme decisionsNotable Point
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...17:12CCV, Type 32 and the future air-defence destroyerQ&A
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:30:55A possible 2030s return for Type 83Q&A
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:12:53Type 83 size and specialist warfare commandQ&A
- Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:27:57Tracing the long development of the Halifax-class frigatesQ&A
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:13:14How stealthy Type 83 was likely to beQ&A
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:25:47What drones an amphibious ship may carryQ&A
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:19:22CCV design freedom versus an available building lineNotable Point
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:36:38Why the CCV timetable depends on the chosen shipyardQ&A
- Bruships 254: Naval History Questions Answered Live4:21:19What Canada could gain from a future UK air-defence programmeQ&A
- Balancing the Humors: How are modern nations balancing diplomacy and war in the ships they build?1:31:39Warship concepts are not yet procurementNotable Point
- Balancing the Humors: How are modern nations balancing diplomacy and war in the ships they build?2:39:05Research spending and delayed British equipment ordersNotable Point
- Balancing the Humors: How are modern nations balancing diplomacy and war in the ships they build?3:05:43Could Britain and Sweden share a Type 83 program?Q&A
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 241:42Possible international partners for Type 83Q&A
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 22:01:36Should Canada join Type 83 or a US nuclear cruiser program?Q&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:40:34Adapting the Type 26 hull for air warfareQ&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:43:45A rapid Type 83 from Type 45 or large Type 26 studiesQ&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:56:38A 144-cell extended Type 45 conceptQ&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:12:03A hypothetical Nakhimov and Type 055 group off BritainQ&A
- Ideal Destroyers: Screening Fleets & National Interests from 1890 to Today1:13:39Post-Cold War destroyer progress stallsNotable Point
- The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?2:47:57Cancelling Type 83 does not necessarily end its sensor and missile workQ&A
- The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?3:19:23Distributed air defence multiplies hull and support demandsChapter
- The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?3:21:56Large autonomous combatants cannot be surged like torpedo boatsQ&A
- The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?3:50:13The Royal Navy need not become the Hybrid Navy's irreversible guinea pigQ&A
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...6:05Why procurement announcements need their supporting infrastructureNotable Point
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...51:56Type 83, Type 32, and the risks behind an Anglo-Dutch LHD planQ&A
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...57:24Type 45 replacement delays, hull life, and dry docksNotable Point
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...59:07Why separating radar and missile ships can create a dependencyNotable Point
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:23:08What cancelling Type 83 would mean for destroyer developmentQ&A
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:55:56Reported Type 83 cancellation and the Common Combat Vessel proposalNotable Point
- Bruships 247: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...57:27An all-drone navy still needs defended command shipsQ&A
- The Rise & Fall of the Constellation Class: What happened to the FFG-62 Program?1:05:12Combined warfare systems, ship size, and fleet numbersNotable Point
- Bruships 244: Naval History Questions Answered Live...50:44Why a larger Type 83 hull need not drive the whole ship's costNotable Point
- Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:00:44The panel's comparison of Type 83s and battlecruisersQ&A
- Destroyers: Modern Navy's most powerful surface combatants - 134yrs of development1:39:03Cruiser-sized destroyers may become USV mothershipsNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)2:42Type 83 points toward a larger air-defence destroyerChapter
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)13:21International destroyer growth provides a size comparisonNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)15:28York and Exeter show the limits of buying smaller cruisersChapter
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)20:07Britain's land-based air-defence gap expands Type 83's roleNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)22:27Requirements drive Type 83 toward a large combatantNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)24:21Type 83's gun battery remains an open design choiceNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)26:21Energy weapons and large aircraft add demands beyond VLS cellsNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)27:14Air-defence command needs room for staff and supporting missionsNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)28:20Larger hulls make machinery and computer redundancy easierNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)31:14Type 45 shows the cost of deleting planned marginsNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)33:23Type 26's ASW design sets limits on an air-defence conversionChapter
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)44:48Type 83 does not need battleship fire supportQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)45:20Type 83 is expected to exceed Type 82's size and capabilityQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)45:41Missile trucks and replenishment at seaQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)53:11Type 83 timing depends on complex-warship yard capacityQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)55:18Older battlecarrier proposals are a poor Type 83 modelQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)56:50Type 83 partnerships need not be limited to EuropeQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)57:33Type 83's design horizon outlasts current governmentsQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)59:48Air defence alone does not make a useful warshipQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)1:14:37Uncrewed escorts can carry weapons or amplify decoy signaturesNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)1:15:07Nuclear escorts would change carrier support and port accessNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)1:22:14India's Project 18 offers a practical Type 83 comparatorChapter
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)1:28:06A Type 83 mothership would support and rearm uncrewed escortsChapter
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)1:31:40How VLS demands can make 192 cells sound modestChapter
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)1:36:17Gun-fired underwater defence and an active anti-torpedo layerNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)1:40:47Type 83's missile examples leave room for successor weaponsQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)1:46:02Electronic warfare belongs across the fleetQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)1:48:44Royal Navy type numbers preserve role-based bandsQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)1:58:26Distributed VLS banks preserve capability after damageQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)2:07:26Nuclear-gas propulsion trades endurance for access limitsQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)2:09:27Type 83 deployments are likely to remain six to nine monthsQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)2:09:36Type 83 is more likely to use a British AESA radar than AegisQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)2:10:17The 192-cell proposal is an aspiration, not a settled limitQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)2:25:28France's FDI is not the Type 83 comparatorQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)2:29:04A twelve-ship Type 83 fleet and an illustrative design menuQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)2:34:55Indian destroyer growth highlights the Royal Navy's shortfallQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)2:39:28Type 83 crewing depends on more than shipboard automationQ&A
- Protecting Ikea in the Cradle; Swedish Destroyers in WWII22:50Type 83 and the complete air-defence threat pictureNotable Point
- Why the Royal Navy's Type 45s Daring Class Destroyers are what they are & what their future is?1:26:59Twenty-four Sea Ceptors and the alternative Mark 41 loadNotable Point
- Why the Royal Navy's Type 45s Daring Class Destroyers are what they are & what their future is?1:34:45Uncrewed escorts still need endurance and shipboard maintenanceChapter
- Why the Royal Navy's Type 45s Daring Class Destroyers are what they are & what their future is?1:40:10Type 83's development leaves time for another Type 45 upgradeNotable Point
- Why the Royal Navy's Type 45s Daring Class Destroyers are what they are & what their future is?1:41:36Could another Type 45 upgrade require a longer hull?Q&A
- Would an AUKUS Destroyer make a sensible 3rd pillar for the Australia, UK & US Defence Cooperation?19:00Type 83 and the danger of revolutionary promisesNotable Point
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...37:54Why an air-defense Type 26 would require a major redesignQ&A
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:27:46Why NATO navies may wait on the next U.S. large combatantQ&A
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:35:35Type 83 versus an air-defense Type 26 derivativeQ&A
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:14:11A larger Type 83 and a hypothetical U.S. design responseQ&A
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:28:43Dockyard capacity in an emergency Type 83 scenarioQ&A
- Bruships 236: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:10:31A Type 83 proposal with weapons on uncrewed companionsNotable Point
- Ideal Destroyers down the generations from 1901 to present day....2:27:31A 36-escort Royal Navy force structureNotable Point
- Ideal Destroyers down the generations from 1901 to present day....2:32:18Why Type 83 is unlikely to be a 96-cell Type 26Q&A
- Ideal Destroyers down the generations from 1901 to present day....2:56:59Type 83 hull choices depend on a still-distant design decisionQ&A
- Bruships 235: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:03:25Crewing the command ship in a task group of uncrewed vesselsNotable Point
- Bruships 235: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:09:38A Canadian Type 83 for Arctic cruiser dutiesQ&A
- Where has Britain's Royal Navy Gone?2:46:322021 shipbuilding ambitions and industrial capacityChapter
- Where has Britain's Royal Navy Gone?3:12:10Atlantic Bastion and the six-ship Type 45 forceNotable Point
- Where has Britain's Royal Navy Gone?3:22:35The 2025 hybrid fleet and autonomous air defenceChapter
- Bruships 234: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:43:30Why cold launch helps Sea Ceptor reloadingQ&A
- Bruships 232: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:22:35Why offboarding Type 83 missiles creates a fragile flotillaQ&A
- Bruships 232: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:41:31Why allies should share combat systems instead of one hullNotable Point
- How many Warships does your Navy need?1:10:05Steady orders support shipyard investment and competitionNotable Point
- The rise and fall of Constellation class Frigate program? (Patreon Live)3:40:01European comparisons with Constellation procurementQ&A
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3rd Start1:29:07Existing frigate orders delay Type 32 and Type 83 constructionNotable Point
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3rd Start1:32:20The force-structure gamble behind a Type 83 hybrid fleetNotable Point
- Trials and Tribulations- why ships go through the testing they do before they enter service2:30:54A speculative Type 83 concept prioritizes missile depthQ&A
- Trials and Tribulations- why ships go through the testing they do before they enter service2:35:47Nuclear base load and gas turbines serve different power demandsQ&A
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 20262:11:09Stealth and growth shape Type 83-scale future destroyersChapter
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 20262:43:43Should Britain partner with Germany on a future destroyer?Q&A
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 20262:53:22Which destroyer options could follow Canada's River class?Q&A
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 20262:58:28Which navies might build the next very large surface combatants?Q&A
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:41:34Keeping Type 45 destroyers alongside Type 83Q&A
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:30:08A Type 45 batch two with an inserted missile sectionQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 17: Missiles, Guns & Other Barrels of Fun30:53Are mission bays a liability for future destroyers?Q&A
- Bruships 225: Naval History & Current Affairs Questions Answered Live...46:06Type 26 cannot substitute for Type 83's fleet air-defence roleQ&A
- Bruships 225: Naval History & Current Affairs Questions Answered Live...2:54:35A proposed 2040 Royal Navy based on three rotating task groupsQ&A
- Type 26 & Type 31 Frigate Program Updates: City, Hunter, River(Destroyer), Inspiration & the rest!6:04British Type 26 construction and yard capacityChapter
- Type 26 & Type 31 Frigate Program Updates: City, Hunter, River(Destroyer), Inspiration & the rest!15:48A ninth British Type 26 could bridge the gap to Type 83Notable Point
- Type 26 & Type 31 Frigate Program Updates: City, Hunter, River(Destroyer), Inspiration & the rest!17:27Why Type 83 should not simply enlarge Type 26Chapter
- Type 26 & Type 31 Frigate Program Updates: City, Hunter, River(Destroyer), Inspiration & the rest!19:02How much larger could Type 83 become?Notable Point
- Type 26 & Type 31 Frigate Program Updates: City, Hunter, River(Destroyer), Inspiration & the rest!38:41Type 31's proposed role inside a defended task groupChapter
- Trumps Battleship; A Naval History view on what we know of the Defiant Class so far45:43Would other navies follow Defiant with larger ships?Q&A
- What the Frigates up with our Frigates? A Bilgepumps Christmas 2025 @Drachinifel& @wgowshipping22:24A tethered radar must work above a moving warshipNotable Point
- What the Frigates up with our Frigates? A Bilgepumps Christmas 2025 @Drachinifel& @wgowshipping53:07Type 83 shows the price of doing every escort jobNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 15: Frigates10:26Type 31, Type 32, and Britain's available shipyardsQ&A
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:24:44Would Type 83 lead to a third British carrier?Q&A
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:31:10Destroyer size, treaty tonnage, and deployable numbersQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle6:47:19Prospects for preserving a Type 45 destroyerQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon7:02:35The November 2025 estimate for Type 83 constructionQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon7:09:20The 2025 case for keeping Type 45 in service until Type 83Q&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon7:13:08Why Type 83 should be more than an enlarged Type 26Q&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon7:19:57Crew standards and command spaces shape Type 83Notable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II6:05:44Testing a heavy-gun Type 83 conceptQ&A
- Bruships 217: Back from Japan 2025: Jetlag is a Myth - Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:25:56Could Type 83 influence the next US destroyer?Q&A
- Nuclear Powered Warships: are they worth the cost?28:06Existing nuclear fleets lower the entry barrierChapter
- Bruships 215 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:19:22A heavily armed Type 83 conceptQ&A
- Bruships 215 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:33:19Canadian cruisers for the River-class fleetQ&A
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age51:04Type 83 revives the large all-round fleet destroyerChapter
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age55:03Large escorts may lead and maintain uncrewed task groupsNotable Point
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age58:44Type 83 size follows from endurance and magazine depthChapter
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age1:03:17Separated VLS groups protect the ship from common failuresNotable Point
- Bruships 214 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:12:24How far ahead Britain plans warship constructionQ&A
- Bruships 213 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:41:34Type 83 and the system-of-systems warshipNotable Point
- Maya Class: The Ultimate Arleigh Burke Flight IIA or something else?47:32Could Britain and Japan share a future large destroyer?Chapter
- #2Historians Live: With @Drachinifel comes to chat & build UAD Dreadnoughts that Almost were P32:21:55What should a Type 83 destroyer class be called?Q&A
- Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:08:46Why surface combatants may pass 30,000 tons againQ&A
- Bruships 210: Naval History Questions Answered Live...19:01Why an air-defense Type 31 would not replace Type 83Q&A
- Bruships 210: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:48:02Could Canada or Australia join Type 83?Q&A
- Battle of Actium(31BC); Last Gasp of the Roman Republic26:13History as input to Type 83 destroyer designNotable Point
- Bruships 209: Science Fiction Naval History Questions Answered Live...41:58Norwegian Type 26 orders and the Type 83 timetableQ&A
- Bruships 209: Science Fiction Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:32:08Could Norwegian Type 26 orders change Type 83's design?Q&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:46:53An unlimited-budget Royal Navy weapons fitQ&A
- Procurement for Peace: Second Draft1:56:03An ideal British escort and OPV mixQ&A
- Procurement for Peace: Second Draft2:04:23How modern fleet design changed after UkraineQ&A
- Procurement for Peace: Second Draft2:05:57How many large uncrewed escorts should a task group use?Q&A
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:16:39Expanding the Royal Navy through existing programsQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:06:15Warship armor against FPV dronesQ&A
- Bruships 201: Naval History Questions Answered Live...52:13Why more frigates require more shipyard capacityNotable Point
- Bruships 201: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:47:20The case for multiple guns on future warshipsQ&A
- Bruships 201: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:52:29Fitting guns around dispersed missile batteriesNotable Point
- Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...59:24A heavily armed Type 83 force-defense conceptQ&A
- Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:14:58How the West might answer twelve Project 23560 destroyersQ&A
- Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:02:52Battlecruiser choices for British and Canadian fleetsQ&A
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...25:01Could Type 45 destroyers serve alongside Type 83?Q&A
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:03:36Type 83 power choices and the shortage of shipyard capacityNotable Point
- Bruships 193: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:10:33Why Royal Navy corvette advocacy depends on timingQ&A
- Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?3:05:52Will drone swarms bring back AA cruisers?Q&A
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:43:53The name Warspite and the still-conceptual Type 83Q&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued20:22Type 31 as the task group's inner escortQ&A
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!2:54:51Could Type 45 destroyers become reserve arsenal ships?Q&A
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!3:19:59The return of the torpedo-boat tender as a drone mothershipQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:10:58The next HMS Renown is more likely to be a Type 83 destroyerQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?3:16:27The Royal Navy's Type 83 numbers problemQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?3:19:59The ship after Type 83 is too distant to define responsiblyQ&A
- Tribal Class of 1907: The WWI Channel Response Force19:16Cammell Laird and the Royal Navy's Cossack name lineageNotable Point
- Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 20243:57:32Why upgrading Type 45 does not by itself prove Type 83 is delayedQ&A
- The Royal Navy's Spirit Ship: HMS Tiger(1913) - Key Ships Series 9, Ship 93:03What Tiger's name suggests for a future Type 83 classNotable Point
- Bruships 172: So the Historiophon Happened...32:23Type 26 yard investment prepares the way for Type 83Notable Point
- Bruships 172: So the Historiophon Happened...2:25:27Why naming the Type 83 class is unusually difficultQ&A
- WWI in the English Channel... A Primer on Years of Hard Forgotten Fighting1:13:12Swift and Viking as a challenge to Type 83 gun armamentNotable Point
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...1:27:03Future escort design and affordable numbersNotable Point
- World of Warships Colab 1, Questions & U Class subs: Second 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 2/44:46:11Could a Type 83 be named HMS Prince Philip?Q&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!1:12:40Small modular reactors for high-power surface combatantsQ&A
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....3:07:28Why an off-the-shelf Burke replacement is difficultQ&A
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....3:17:17FDI frigates and a possible Type 83 tumblehome hullNotable Point
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!3:53:44Where the Royal Navy might reuse HoodQ&A
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote59:51Japanese Aegis cruisers and a new size competitionQ&A
- Agamemnon was not alone: The Ardent Class Third Rate 64s - Key Ships Series 8, Ship 101:23:26Type 83, air defense, and the cost of specializationNotable Point
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books1:01:06Possible Type 83 names and their local tiesQ&A
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books3:02:53Why a stretched River corvette has no clear fleet nicheQ&A
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books3:24:20The Type 32 as a drone-control frigateQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered3:27:11Type 26 numbers versus the Type 83 air-defense needQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered3:30:22Why Type 83 concept art did not settle the designNotable Point
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered4:02:43Why FREMM adds little to Britain's escort programQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!2:02:37Why early Type 83 renderings should not be treated as a designQ&A
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered24:49Type 45 refits and the path toward Type 83Q&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered2:33:32Why a cheaper Type 47 could displace the Type 83Q&A
- Sloops Adaptability of Presence12:36The modern Royal Navy capability ladderChapter
- HMS Diamond(1950) D35: Presence without Conviction is no Detterence - Key Ship Series 7 Ship 812:16How cutting Type 45 numbers inflated unit costNotable Point
- 'S' Class Submarines: The Royal Navy's All Rounders for WWII - Key Ship Series 7 Ship 71:18:09What modern escort fleets lose when one ship must do everythingNotable Point
- Who killed the Battleship? / Why no more battleships?18:13Specialized yards limit real competitionChapter
- Bruships 131: Battleships...3:12:03What determines the Type 83 fleet sizeQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships51:05A layered gun layout for a Type 83 destroyerQ&A
- Future Maritime Strategy: Beyond Cable and Corbett9:43Shipbuilding strategy begins before the ship designNotable Point
- Future Maritime Strategy: Beyond Cable and Corbett54:01Naval presence needs forces appropriate to the threatChapter
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare1:27:15Why nuclear-powered escorts may returnQ&A
- Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series16:15A larger Royal Navy built around escort groupsQ&A
- Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series1:58:44Carrier operations and global patrols depend on future escort numbersQ&A
- Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series2:58:51Type 83, paper Russian projects, and a larger Type 055Q&A
- Neptune Class: The Cruiser Conundrum Crisis - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 627:15Neptune as a modern large-combatant parallelNotable Point
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 855:05Carrier defence needs layers, not a last-ditch substituteQ&A
- Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics2:37:47Why too few hulls drive the Royal Navy toward larger shipsQ&A
- Naval History Questions Live... with Irn Bru... which is a scottish soft drink... not fizzy whisky!1:09:06Why the Type 83 force needs more than two hullsQ&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy32:51Escort numbers shape a navy’s useful strengthQ&A
- Bruships 109: Mahan, an inspiration & a Reflection + Bonus3:32:30Why Poland would need a foreign-built cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 109: Mahan, an inspiration & a Reflection + Bonus3:37:32Why a globally deployed Type 83 grows toward cruiser sizeQ&A
- Bruships 109: Mahan, an inspiration & a Reflection + Bonus3:51:40Why a future Type 83 may avoid another City classNotable Point
- Bruships 109: Mahan, an inspiration & a Reflection + Bonus4:05:02A tentative estimate of Type 83 fleet sizeQ&A
- Bruships 101: No Dalmations, but a whole HMS Belfast to build53:23After Type 26, UAVs for British carriersQ&A
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat2:42:27A modern third rate as a 16,000-ton Type 83Q&A
- 19th Century Cruisers: Comment Response Video 3 (Sfax - Geffion)9:55A larger Type 26 as command ship and escort leaderQ&A
- Offset Strategies One to Four30:27Today's ship programmes constrain tomorrow's fleetNotable Point
- Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions3:03:24Why HMS Princess Margaret would need a capital shipQ&A
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?1:10:33Type 31's forward-based sloop roleNotable Point
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?1:22:25A Royal Navy force built around Type 26Q&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 21:48:07Why restarting Type 45 production is impracticalQ&A
- Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN54:58Shared destroyer design can spread development cost and improve availabilityNotable Point
- Patreon 53: Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN2:51:49A shared Type 83-era destroyer familyNotable Point
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...6:39When a large destroyer is functionally a cruiserNotable Point
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...23:31Why navies avoid calling modern ships cruisersNotable Point
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...47:52What a cruiser-sized Type 83 might carryQ&A
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...2:12:14Why modern escorts often act as cruisersQ&A
- Sentinel Class (1904): Scout Cruisers (Long Patrol)30:18Fleet demand keeps shipbuilding lines aliveNotable Point
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...2:17:07An Admiral-class identity for Type 83Q&A
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...3:29:12Type 83 as a cruiser in all but nameQ&A
- Bruships 73: Some Old, Some New, None Borrowed, but Some Blue1:10:22Five flight decks require a much deeper escort fleetNotable Point
- HMS Tiger - The Battle Cruiser Hunter 2, The UAD Version: A UAD infused Discussion (Long Patrol)41:42When changing Type 26 means designing a new shipChapter
- HMS Tiger - The Battle Cruiser Hunter 2, The UAD Version: A UAD infused Discussion (Long Patrol)49:46Type 45 shortfall and specialist task groupsChapter
- British Industry: The More than Just Ships P1/4 - Building (Long Patrol)9:21Why building warships at home became politically vitalNotable Point
- British Industry: The More than Just Ships P1/4 - Building (Long Patrol)51:15Fleet size and the economics of yard competitionNotable Point
- Bruships 68: Random Naval History Books & Questions3:11:31A larger Royal Navy also needs larger graving docksQ&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru1:15:35What a modern two-power-standard Royal Navy would requireQ&A
- Bruships 63: The Writing Theorists - Corbett & Mahan, Richmond & Simms, Cable & Gorshkhov4:40:28Keep Type 45s or fund more replacement ships?Q&A
- Inspiration of Theorists: The Maritime & Strategic Lessons of the Seven Years War (1756-63)1:25:59Ranger branding does not solve force scarcityNotable Point
- Patreon 36: Repair Ships, Depot Ships, Tenders and Stores Ships...1:08:24Were early Type 83 images official designs?Q&A
- Patreon 36: Repair Ships, Depot Ships, Tenders and Stores Ships...2:51:13A 48-escort Royal Navy force modelNotable Point
- Patreon 38: Evaluating Type 26 Frigates against WW2 ship classes...1:40:37Why a future Type 83 could blur the destroyer-cruiser boundaryQ&A
- Bruships 60: Covid Jab, Bad Back & New Books51:07What happens when missiles run shortQ&A
- Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat2:27:35The Type 83 propulsion tradeoffQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)39:11Making the case for a larger Type 83 destroyer forceChapter
- A Book or Two to Review (32): Total Germany4:05Why modern naval conclusions date quicklyNotable Point
- A Book or Two to Review (19): British Battle Tanks13:44Best-fit procurement and modern warshipsNotable Point
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions3:39:09An Admiral-class Type 83 could revive Nelson, Rodney, and VianQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (2)1:38:26Type 26 numbers and a Type 83 industrial planQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (2)3:23:10Why the Type 83 must exceed the Type 45Q&A
- Bruships 52: A Year of Bruships - Questions & Books2:34:54Why future warships may use podded propulsionNotable Point
- Bruships 51: The Age of Iron3:31:33Why Type 83 could become a quasi-capital shipQ&A
- Bruships 51: The Age of Iron3:54:14Do flag facilities and missile counts define a cruiser?Q&A
- Bruships 50: A D-Day special with Questions & some New Books from Pen & Sword4:04:56How Type 26, Type 31, and Type 83 divide Royal Navy rolesNotable Point
- The Battle of the Saintes (1782): 239yrs ago... Today!1:48:47Would the Royal Navy rebuild a modern class as deeply?Q&A
- Minotaur & Tiger Class Cruisers3:01:02Type 83 points toward a cruiser-sized hullChapter
- Minotaur & Tiger Class Cruisers3:14:16Type 83 grows because it combines specialized fleetsQ&A
- Minotaur & Tiger Class Cruisers3:17:50Eight Type 83s support persistent deploymentQ&A
- Bruships 43: Aircraft Carriers & Naval Aviation4:21:34A larger Type 83 need not require a larger crewQ&A