Topic

Type 83 Destroyer

Also searchable as Type 83, Type 83 Destroyers.

Related time notes

  1. Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    3:47:23Town cruisers and Renown imagined with modern weaponsQ&A
  2. Rise of the Frigate Navies: Why so many nations are going Frigate and why others want them as well!
    1:38:42Type 83 and the consequences of an occupied shipyardNotable Point
  3. Bruships 265: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:43:43Destroyer replacement schedules and life-extension riskNotable Point
  4. Bruships 265: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:38:06Choosing an unbuilt warship with maintenance providedQ&A
  5. Bruships 265: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:15:59An enlarged Type 45 as a Type 83 starting pointQ&A
  6. Britain's Rearmament 1937 vs 2026: What Lessons are we forgetting?
    1:13:14Type 83 and the shipyard timetable behind programme decisionsNotable Point
  7. Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    17:12CCV, Type 32 and the future air-defence destroyerQ&A
  8. Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:30:55A possible 2030s return for Type 83Q&A
  9. Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:12:53Type 83 size and specialist warfare commandQ&A
  10. Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    1:27:57Tracing the long development of the Halifax-class frigatesQ&A
  11. Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:13:14How stealthy Type 83 was likely to beQ&A
  12. Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:25:47What drones an amphibious ship may carryQ&A
  13. Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:19:22CCV design freedom versus an available building lineNotable Point
  14. Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:36:38Why the CCV timetable depends on the chosen shipyardQ&A
  15. Bruships 254: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    4:21:19What Canada could gain from a future UK air-defence programmeQ&A
  16. Balancing the Humors: How are modern nations balancing diplomacy and war in the ships they build?
    1:31:39Warship concepts are not yet procurementNotable Point
  17. Balancing the Humors: How are modern nations balancing diplomacy and war in the ships they build?
    2:39:05Research spending and delayed British equipment ordersNotable Point
  18. Balancing the Humors: How are modern nations balancing diplomacy and war in the ships they build?
    3:05:43Could Britain and Sweden share a Type 83 program?Q&A
  19. Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2
    41:42Possible international partners for Type 83Q&A
  20. Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2
    2:01:36Should Canada join Type 83 or a US nuclear cruiser program?Q&A
  21. Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:40:34Adapting the Type 26 hull for air warfareQ&A
  22. Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:43:45A rapid Type 83 from Type 45 or large Type 26 studiesQ&A
  23. Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:56:38A 144-cell extended Type 45 conceptQ&A
  24. Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:12:03A hypothetical Nakhimov and Type 055 group off BritainQ&A
  25. Ideal Destroyers: Screening Fleets & National Interests from 1890 to Today
    1:13:39Post-Cold War destroyer progress stallsNotable Point
  26. The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?
    2:47:57Cancelling Type 83 does not necessarily end its sensor and missile workQ&A
  27. The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?
    3:19:23Distributed air defence multiplies hull and support demandsChapter
  28. The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?
    3:21:56Large autonomous combatants cannot be surged like torpedo boatsQ&A
  29. The Defence Investment Plan is Out... Let's Talk it through, Good, Bad & What the Frigate?
    3:50:13The Royal Navy need not become the Hybrid Navy's irreversible guinea pigQ&A
  30. Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    6:05Why procurement announcements need their supporting infrastructureNotable Point
  31. Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    51:56Type 83, Type 32, and the risks behind an Anglo-Dutch LHD planQ&A
  32. Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    57:24Type 45 replacement delays, hull life, and dry docksNotable Point
  33. Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    59:07Why separating radar and missile ships can create a dependencyNotable Point
  34. Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:23:08What cancelling Type 83 would mean for destroyer developmentQ&A
  35. Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:55:56Reported Type 83 cancellation and the Common Combat Vessel proposalNotable Point
  36. Bruships 247: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    57:27An all-drone navy still needs defended command shipsQ&A
  37. The Rise & Fall of the Constellation Class: What happened to the FFG-62 Program?
    1:05:12Combined warfare systems, ship size, and fleet numbersNotable Point
  38. Bruships 244: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    50:44Why a larger Type 83 hull need not drive the whole ship's costNotable Point
  39. Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:00:44The panel's comparison of Type 83s and battlecruisersQ&A
  40. Destroyers: Modern Navy's most powerful surface combatants - 134yrs of development
    1:39:03Cruiser-sized destroyers may become USV mothershipsNotable Point
  41. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    2:42Type 83 points toward a larger air-defence destroyerChapter
  42. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    13:21International destroyer growth provides a size comparisonNotable Point
  43. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    15:28York and Exeter show the limits of buying smaller cruisersChapter
  44. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    20:07Britain's land-based air-defence gap expands Type 83's roleNotable Point
  45. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    22:27Requirements drive Type 83 toward a large combatantNotable Point
  46. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    24:21Type 83's gun battery remains an open design choiceNotable Point
  47. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    26:21Energy weapons and large aircraft add demands beyond VLS cellsNotable Point
  48. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    27:14Air-defence command needs room for staff and supporting missionsNotable Point
  49. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    28:20Larger hulls make machinery and computer redundancy easierNotable Point
  50. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    31:14Type 45 shows the cost of deleting planned marginsNotable Point
  51. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    33:23Type 26's ASW design sets limits on an air-defence conversionChapter
  52. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    44:48Type 83 does not need battleship fire supportQ&A
  53. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    45:20Type 83 is expected to exceed Type 82's size and capabilityQ&A
  54. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    45:41Missile trucks and replenishment at seaQ&A
  55. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    53:11Type 83 timing depends on complex-warship yard capacityQ&A
  56. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    55:18Older battlecarrier proposals are a poor Type 83 modelQ&A
  57. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    56:50Type 83 partnerships need not be limited to EuropeQ&A
  58. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    57:33Type 83's design horizon outlasts current governmentsQ&A
  59. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    59:48Air defence alone does not make a useful warshipQ&A
  60. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    1:14:37Uncrewed escorts can carry weapons or amplify decoy signaturesNotable Point
  61. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    1:15:07Nuclear escorts would change carrier support and port accessNotable Point
  62. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    1:22:14India's Project 18 offers a practical Type 83 comparatorChapter
  63. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    1:28:06A Type 83 mothership would support and rearm uncrewed escortsChapter
  64. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    1:31:40How VLS demands can make 192 cells sound modestChapter
  65. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    1:36:17Gun-fired underwater defence and an active anti-torpedo layerNotable Point
  66. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    1:40:47Type 83's missile examples leave room for successor weaponsQ&A
  67. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    1:46:02Electronic warfare belongs across the fleetQ&A
  68. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    1:48:44Royal Navy type numbers preserve role-based bandsQ&A
  69. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    1:58:26Distributed VLS banks preserve capability after damageQ&A
  70. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    2:07:26Nuclear-gas propulsion trades endurance for access limitsQ&A
  71. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    2:09:27Type 83 deployments are likely to remain six to nine monthsQ&A
  72. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    2:09:36Type 83 is more likely to use a British AESA radar than AegisQ&A
  73. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    2:10:17The 192-cell proposal is an aspiration, not a settled limitQ&A
  74. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    2:25:28France's FDI is not the Type 83 comparatorQ&A
  75. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    2:29:04A twelve-ship Type 83 fleet and an illustrative design menuQ&A
  76. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    2:34:55Indian destroyer growth highlights the Royal Navy's shortfallQ&A
  77. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    2:39:28Type 83 crewing depends on more than shipboard automationQ&A
  78. Protecting Ikea in the Cradle; Swedish Destroyers in WWII
    22:50Type 83 and the complete air-defence threat pictureNotable Point
  79. Why the Royal Navy's Type 45s Daring Class Destroyers are what they are & what their future is?
    1:26:59Twenty-four Sea Ceptors and the alternative Mark 41 loadNotable Point
  80. Why the Royal Navy's Type 45s Daring Class Destroyers are what they are & what their future is?
    1:34:45Uncrewed escorts still need endurance and shipboard maintenanceChapter
  81. Why the Royal Navy's Type 45s Daring Class Destroyers are what they are & what their future is?
    1:40:10Type 83's development leaves time for another Type 45 upgradeNotable Point
  82. Why the Royal Navy's Type 45s Daring Class Destroyers are what they are & what their future is?
    1:41:36Could another Type 45 upgrade require a longer hull?Q&A
  83. Would an AUKUS Destroyer make a sensible 3rd pillar for the Australia, UK & US Defence Cooperation?
    19:00Type 83 and the danger of revolutionary promisesNotable Point
  84. Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    37:54Why an air-defense Type 26 would require a major redesignQ&A
  85. Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:27:46Why NATO navies may wait on the next U.S. large combatantQ&A
  86. Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:35:35Type 83 versus an air-defense Type 26 derivativeQ&A
  87. Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:14:11A larger Type 83 and a hypothetical U.S. design responseQ&A
  88. Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:28:43Dockyard capacity in an emergency Type 83 scenarioQ&A
  89. Bruships 236: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:10:31A Type 83 proposal with weapons on uncrewed companionsNotable Point
  90. Ideal Destroyers down the generations from 1901 to present day....
    2:27:31A 36-escort Royal Navy force structureNotable Point
  91. Ideal Destroyers down the generations from 1901 to present day....
    2:32:18Why Type 83 is unlikely to be a 96-cell Type 26Q&A
  92. Ideal Destroyers down the generations from 1901 to present day....
    2:56:59Type 83 hull choices depend on a still-distant design decisionQ&A
  93. Bruships 235: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:03:25Crewing the command ship in a task group of uncrewed vesselsNotable Point
  94. Bruships 235: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:09:38A Canadian Type 83 for Arctic cruiser dutiesQ&A
  95. Where has Britain's Royal Navy Gone?
    2:46:322021 shipbuilding ambitions and industrial capacityChapter
  96. Where has Britain's Royal Navy Gone?
    3:12:10Atlantic Bastion and the six-ship Type 45 forceNotable Point
  97. Where has Britain's Royal Navy Gone?
    3:22:35The 2025 hybrid fleet and autonomous air defenceChapter
  98. Bruships 234: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:43:30Why cold launch helps Sea Ceptor reloadingQ&A
  99. Bruships 232: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:22:35Why offboarding Type 83 missiles creates a fragile flotillaQ&A
  100. Bruships 232: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:41:31Why allies should share combat systems instead of one hullNotable Point
  101. How many Warships does your Navy need?
    1:10:05Steady orders support shipyard investment and competitionNotable Point
  102. The rise and fall of Constellation class Frigate program? (Patreon Live)
    3:40:01European comparisons with Constellation procurementQ&A
  103. Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3rd Start
    1:29:07Existing frigate orders delay Type 32 and Type 83 constructionNotable Point
  104. Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3rd Start
    1:32:20The force-structure gamble behind a Type 83 hybrid fleetNotable Point
  105. Trials and Tribulations- why ships go through the testing they do before they enter service
    2:30:54A speculative Type 83 concept prioritizes missile depthQ&A
  106. Trials and Tribulations- why ships go through the testing they do before they enter service
    2:35:47Nuclear base load and gas turbines serve different power demandsQ&A
  107. 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 2026
    2:11:09Stealth and growth shape Type 83-scale future destroyersChapter
  108. 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 2026
    2:43:43Should Britain partner with Germany on a future destroyer?Q&A
  109. 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 2026
    2:53:22Which destroyer options could follow Canada's River class?Q&A
  110. 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 2026
    2:58:28Which navies might build the next very large surface combatants?Q&A
  111. Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:41:34Keeping Type 45 destroyers alongside Type 83Q&A
  112. Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:30:08A Type 45 batch two with an inserted missile sectionQ&A
  113. Scuttlebutt 17: Missiles, Guns & Other Barrels of Fun
    30:53Are mission bays a liability for future destroyers?Q&A
  114. Bruships 225: Naval History & Current Affairs Questions Answered Live...
    46:06Type 26 cannot substitute for Type 83's fleet air-defence roleQ&A
  115. Bruships 225: Naval History & Current Affairs Questions Answered Live...
    2:54:35A proposed 2040 Royal Navy based on three rotating task groupsQ&A
  116. Type 26 & Type 31 Frigate Program Updates: City, Hunter, River(Destroyer), Inspiration & the rest!
    6:04British Type 26 construction and yard capacityChapter
  117. Type 26 & Type 31 Frigate Program Updates: City, Hunter, River(Destroyer), Inspiration & the rest!
    15:48A ninth British Type 26 could bridge the gap to Type 83Notable Point
  118. Type 26 & Type 31 Frigate Program Updates: City, Hunter, River(Destroyer), Inspiration & the rest!
    17:27Why Type 83 should not simply enlarge Type 26Chapter
  119. Type 26 & Type 31 Frigate Program Updates: City, Hunter, River(Destroyer), Inspiration & the rest!
    19:02How much larger could Type 83 become?Notable Point
  120. Type 26 & Type 31 Frigate Program Updates: City, Hunter, River(Destroyer), Inspiration & the rest!
    38:41Type 31's proposed role inside a defended task groupChapter
  121. Trumps Battleship; A Naval History view on what we know of the Defiant Class so far
    45:43Would other navies follow Defiant with larger ships?Q&A
  122. What the Frigates up with our Frigates? A Bilgepumps Christmas 2025 @Drachinifel& @wgowshipping
    22:24A tethered radar must work above a moving warshipNotable Point
  123. What the Frigates up with our Frigates? A Bilgepumps Christmas 2025 @Drachinifel& @wgowshipping
    53:07Type 83 shows the price of doing every escort jobNotable Point
  124. Scuttlebutt 15: Frigates
    10:26Type 31, Type 32, and Britain's available shipyardsQ&A
  125. Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:24:44Would Type 83 lead to a third British carrier?Q&A
  126. Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:31:10Destroyer size, treaty tonnage, and deployable numbersQ&A
  127. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle
    6:47:19Prospects for preserving a Type 45 destroyerQ&A
  128. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon
    7:02:35The November 2025 estimate for Type 83 constructionQ&A
  129. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon
    7:09:20The 2025 case for keeping Type 45 in service until Type 83Q&A
  130. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon
    7:13:08Why Type 83 should be more than an enlarged Type 26Q&A
  131. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon
    7:19:57Crew standards and command spaces shape Type 83Notable Point
  132. Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II
    6:05:44Testing a heavy-gun Type 83 conceptQ&A
  133. Bruships 217: Back from Japan 2025: Jetlag is a Myth - Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:25:56Could Type 83 influence the next US destroyer?Q&A
  134. Nuclear Powered Warships: are they worth the cost?
    28:06Existing nuclear fleets lower the entry barrierChapter
  135. Bruships 215 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:19:22A heavily armed Type 83 conceptQ&A
  136. Bruships 215 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:33:19Canadian cruisers for the River-class fleetQ&A
  137. Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age
    51:04Type 83 revives the large all-round fleet destroyerChapter
  138. Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age
    55:03Large escorts may lead and maintain uncrewed task groupsNotable Point
  139. Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age
    58:44Type 83 size follows from endurance and magazine depthChapter
  140. Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age
    1:03:17Separated VLS groups protect the ship from common failuresNotable Point
  141. Bruships 214 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:12:24How far ahead Britain plans warship constructionQ&A
  142. Bruships 213 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:41:34Type 83 and the system-of-systems warshipNotable Point
  143. Maya Class: The Ultimate Arleigh Burke Flight IIA or something else?
    47:32Could Britain and Japan share a future large destroyer?Chapter
  144. #2Historians Live: With @Drachinifel comes to chat & build UAD Dreadnoughts that Almost were P3
    2:21:55What should a Type 83 destroyer class be called?Q&A
  145. Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:08:46Why surface combatants may pass 30,000 tons againQ&A
  146. Bruships 210: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    19:01Why an air-defense Type 31 would not replace Type 83Q&A
  147. Bruships 210: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:48:02Could Canada or Australia join Type 83?Q&A
  148. Battle of Actium(31BC); Last Gasp of the Roman Republic
    26:13History as input to Type 83 destroyer designNotable Point
  149. Bruships 209: Science Fiction Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    41:58Norwegian Type 26 orders and the Type 83 timetableQ&A
  150. Bruships 209: Science Fiction Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:32:08Could Norwegian Type 26 orders change Type 83's design?Q&A
  151. Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:46:53An unlimited-budget Royal Navy weapons fitQ&A
  152. Procurement for Peace: Second Draft
    1:56:03An ideal British escort and OPV mixQ&A
  153. Procurement for Peace: Second Draft
    2:04:23How modern fleet design changed after UkraineQ&A
  154. Procurement for Peace: Second Draft
    2:05:57How many large uncrewed escorts should a task group use?Q&A
  155. Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    5:16:39Expanding the Royal Navy through existing programsQ&A
  156. Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    5:06:15Warship armor against FPV dronesQ&A
  157. Bruships 201: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    52:13Why more frigates require more shipyard capacityNotable Point
  158. Bruships 201: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:47:20The case for multiple guns on future warshipsQ&A
  159. Bruships 201: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:52:29Fitting guns around dispersed missile batteriesNotable Point
  160. Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    59:24A heavily armed Type 83 force-defense conceptQ&A
  161. Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:14:58How the West might answer twelve Project 23560 destroyersQ&A
  162. Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    5:02:52Battlecruiser choices for British and Canadian fleetsQ&A
  163. Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    25:01Could Type 45 destroyers serve alongside Type 83?Q&A
  164. Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:03:36Type 83 power choices and the shortage of shipyard capacityNotable Point
  165. Bruships 193: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:10:33Why Royal Navy corvette advocacy depends on timingQ&A
  166. Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?
    3:05:52Will drone swarms bring back AA cruisers?Q&A
  167. Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:43:53The name Warspite and the still-conceptual Type 83Q&A
  168. Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued
    20:22Type 31 as the task group's inner escortQ&A
  169. Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!
    2:54:51Could Type 45 destroyers become reserve arsenal ships?Q&A
  170. Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!
    3:19:59The return of the torpedo-boat tender as a drone mothershipQ&A
  171. Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    5:10:58The next HMS Renown is more likely to be a Type 83 destroyerQ&A
  172. Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?
    3:16:27The Royal Navy's Type 83 numbers problemQ&A
  173. Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?
    3:19:59The ship after Type 83 is too distant to define responsiblyQ&A
  174. Tribal Class of 1907: The WWI Channel Response Force
    19:16Cammell Laird and the Royal Navy's Cossack name lineageNotable Point
  175. Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 2024
    3:57:32Why upgrading Type 45 does not by itself prove Type 83 is delayedQ&A
  176. The Royal Navy's Spirit Ship: HMS Tiger(1913) - Key Ships Series 9, Ship 9
    3:03What Tiger's name suggests for a future Type 83 classNotable Point
  177. Bruships 172: So the Historiophon Happened...
    32:23Type 26 yard investment prepares the way for Type 83Notable Point
  178. Bruships 172: So the Historiophon Happened...
    2:25:27Why naming the Type 83 class is unusually difficultQ&A
  179. WWI in the English Channel... A Primer on Years of Hard Forgotten Fighting
    1:13:12Swift and Viking as a challenge to Type 83 gun armamentNotable Point
  180. 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...
    1:27:03Future escort design and affordable numbersNotable Point
  181. World of Warships Colab 1, Questions & U Class subs: Second 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 2/4
    4:46:11Could a Type 83 be named HMS Prince Philip?Q&A
  182. Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!
    1:12:40Small modular reactors for high-power surface combatantsQ&A
  183. Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....
    3:07:28Why an off-the-shelf Burke replacement is difficultQ&A
  184. Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....
    3:17:17FDI frigates and a possible Type 83 tumblehome hullNotable Point
  185. Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!
    3:53:44Where the Royal Navy might reuse HoodQ&A
  186. Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote
    59:51Japanese Aegis cruisers and a new size competitionQ&A
  187. Agamemnon was not alone: The Ardent Class Third Rate 64s - Key Ships Series 8, Ship 10
    1:23:26Type 83, air defense, and the cost of specializationNotable Point
  188. Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books
    1:01:06Possible Type 83 names and their local tiesQ&A
  189. Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books
    3:02:53Why a stretched River corvette has no clear fleet nicheQ&A
  190. Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books
    3:24:20The Type 32 as a drone-control frigateQ&A
  191. Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered
    3:27:11Type 26 numbers versus the Type 83 air-defense needQ&A
  192. Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered
    3:30:22Why Type 83 concept art did not settle the designNotable Point
  193. Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered
    4:02:43Why FREMM adds little to Britain's escort programQ&A
  194. Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!
    2:02:37Why early Type 83 renderings should not be treated as a designQ&A
  195. Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered
    24:49Type 45 refits and the path toward Type 83Q&A
  196. Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered
    2:33:32Why a cheaper Type 47 could displace the Type 83Q&A
  197. Sloops Adaptability of Presence
    12:36The modern Royal Navy capability ladderChapter
  198. HMS Diamond(1950) D35: Presence without Conviction is no Detterence - Key Ship Series 7 Ship 8
    12:16How cutting Type 45 numbers inflated unit costNotable Point
  199. 'S' Class Submarines: The Royal Navy's All Rounders for WWII - Key Ship Series 7 Ship 7
    1:18:09What modern escort fleets lose when one ship must do everythingNotable Point
  200. Who killed the Battleship? / Why no more battleships?
    18:13Specialized yards limit real competitionChapter
  201. Bruships 131: Battleships...
    3:12:03What determines the Type 83 fleet sizeQ&A
  202. Bruships 130: Battleships
    51:05A layered gun layout for a Type 83 destroyerQ&A
  203. Future Maritime Strategy: Beyond Cable and Corbett
    9:43Shipbuilding strategy begins before the ship designNotable Point
  204. Future Maritime Strategy: Beyond Cable and Corbett
    54:01Naval presence needs forces appropriate to the threatChapter
  205. Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare
    1:27:15Why nuclear-powered escorts may returnQ&A
  206. Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series
    16:15A larger Royal Navy built around escort groupsQ&A
  207. Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series
    1:58:44Carrier operations and global patrols depend on future escort numbersQ&A
  208. Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series
    2:58:51Type 83, paper Russian projects, and a larger Type 055Q&A
  209. Neptune Class: The Cruiser Conundrum Crisis - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 6
    27:15Neptune as a modern large-combatant parallelNotable Point
  210. A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 8
    55:05Carrier defence needs layers, not a last-ditch substituteQ&A
  211. Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics
    2:37:47Why too few hulls drive the Royal Navy toward larger shipsQ&A
  212. Naval History Questions Live... with Irn Bru... which is a scottish soft drink... not fizzy whisky!
    1:09:06Why the Type 83 force needs more than two hullsQ&A
  213. Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy
    32:51Escort numbers shape a navy’s useful strengthQ&A
  214. Bruships 109: Mahan, an inspiration & a Reflection + Bonus
    3:32:30Why Poland would need a foreign-built cruiserQ&A
  215. Bruships 109: Mahan, an inspiration & a Reflection + Bonus
    3:37:32Why a globally deployed Type 83 grows toward cruiser sizeQ&A
  216. Bruships 109: Mahan, an inspiration & a Reflection + Bonus
    3:51:40Why a future Type 83 may avoid another City classNotable Point
  217. Bruships 109: Mahan, an inspiration & a Reflection + Bonus
    4:05:02A tentative estimate of Type 83 fleet sizeQ&A
  218. Bruships 101: No Dalmations, but a whole HMS Belfast to build
    53:23After Type 26, UAVs for British carriersQ&A
  219. Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat
    2:42:27A modern third rate as a 16,000-ton Type 83Q&A
  220. 19th Century Cruisers: Comment Response Video 3 (Sfax - Geffion)
    9:55A larger Type 26 as command ship and escort leaderQ&A
  221. Offset Strategies One to Four
    30:27Today's ship programmes constrain tomorrow's fleetNotable Point
  222. Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions
    3:03:24Why HMS Princess Margaret would need a capital shipQ&A
  223. Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?
    1:10:33Type 31's forward-based sloop roleNotable Point
  224. Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?
    1:22:25A Royal Navy force built around Type 26Q&A
  225. Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 2
    1:48:07Why restarting Type 45 production is impracticalQ&A
  226. Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN
    54:58Shared destroyer design can spread development cost and improve availabilityNotable Point
  227. Patreon 53: Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN
    2:51:49A shared Type 83-era destroyer familyNotable Point
  228. Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...
    6:39When a large destroyer is functionally a cruiserNotable Point
  229. Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...
    23:31Why navies avoid calling modern ships cruisersNotable Point
  230. Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...
    47:52What a cruiser-sized Type 83 might carryQ&A
  231. Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...
    2:12:14Why modern escorts often act as cruisersQ&A
  232. Sentinel Class (1904): Scout Cruisers (Long Patrol)
    30:18Fleet demand keeps shipbuilding lines aliveNotable Point
  233. Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...
    2:17:07An Admiral-class identity for Type 83Q&A
  234. Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...
    3:29:12Type 83 as a cruiser in all but nameQ&A
  235. Bruships 73: Some Old, Some New, None Borrowed, but Some Blue
    1:10:22Five flight decks require a much deeper escort fleetNotable Point
  236. HMS Tiger - The Battle Cruiser Hunter 2, The UAD Version: A UAD infused Discussion (Long Patrol)
    41:42When changing Type 26 means designing a new shipChapter
  237. HMS Tiger - The Battle Cruiser Hunter 2, The UAD Version: A UAD infused Discussion (Long Patrol)
    49:46Type 45 shortfall and specialist task groupsChapter
  238. British Industry: The More than Just Ships P1/4 - Building (Long Patrol)
    9:21Why building warships at home became politically vitalNotable Point
  239. British Industry: The More than Just Ships P1/4 - Building (Long Patrol)
    51:15Fleet size and the economics of yard competitionNotable Point
  240. Bruships 68: Random Naval History Books & Questions
    3:11:31A larger Royal Navy also needs larger graving docksQ&A
  241. Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru
    1:15:35What a modern two-power-standard Royal Navy would requireQ&A
  242. Bruships 63: The Writing Theorists - Corbett & Mahan, Richmond & Simms, Cable & Gorshkhov
    4:40:28Keep Type 45s or fund more replacement ships?Q&A
  243. Inspiration of Theorists: The Maritime & Strategic Lessons of the Seven Years War (1756-63)
    1:25:59Ranger branding does not solve force scarcityNotable Point
  244. Patreon 36: Repair Ships, Depot Ships, Tenders and Stores Ships...
    1:08:24Were early Type 83 images official designs?Q&A
  245. Patreon 36: Repair Ships, Depot Ships, Tenders and Stores Ships...
    2:51:13A 48-escort Royal Navy force modelNotable Point
  246. Patreon 38: Evaluating Type 26 Frigates against WW2 ship classes...
    1:40:37Why a future Type 83 could blur the destroyer-cruiser boundaryQ&A
  247. Bruships 60: Covid Jab, Bad Back & New Books
    51:07What happens when missiles run shortQ&A
  248. Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat
    2:27:35The Type 83 propulsion tradeoffQ&A
  249. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)
    39:11Making the case for a larger Type 83 destroyer forceChapter
  250. A Book or Two to Review (32): Total Germany
    4:05Why modern naval conclusions date quicklyNotable Point
  251. A Book or Two to Review (19): British Battle Tanks
    13:44Best-fit procurement and modern warshipsNotable Point
  252. Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions
    3:39:09An Admiral-class Type 83 could revive Nelson, Rodney, and VianQ&A
  253. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (2)
    1:38:26Type 26 numbers and a Type 83 industrial planQ&A
  254. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (2)
    3:23:10Why the Type 83 must exceed the Type 45Q&A
  255. Bruships 52: A Year of Bruships - Questions & Books
    2:34:54Why future warships may use podded propulsionNotable Point
  256. Bruships 51: The Age of Iron
    3:31:33Why Type 83 could become a quasi-capital shipQ&A
  257. Bruships 51: The Age of Iron
    3:54:14Do flag facilities and missile counts define a cruiser?Q&A
  258. Bruships 50: A D-Day special with Questions & some New Books from Pen & Sword
    4:04:56How Type 26, Type 31, and Type 83 divide Royal Navy rolesNotable Point
  259. The Battle of the Saintes (1782): 239yrs ago... Today!
    1:48:47Would the Royal Navy rebuild a modern class as deeply?Q&A
  260. Minotaur & Tiger Class Cruisers
    3:01:02Type 83 points toward a cruiser-sized hullChapter
  261. Minotaur & Tiger Class Cruisers
    3:14:16Type 83 grows because it combines specialized fleetsQ&A
  262. Minotaur & Tiger Class Cruisers
    3:17:50Eight Type 83s support persistent deploymentQ&A
  263. Bruships 43: Aircraft Carriers & Naval Aviation
    4:21:34A larger Type 83 need not require a larger crewQ&A