Naval Historywith Dr. Alex

Topic

Dual Purpose Guns

Related time notes

  1. Japanese Destroyers of WWII: Quantity is a Quality of it's own, it can also be a Decisive one
    25:12Type 98 guns and the cost of an Akizuki redesignChapter
  2. Japanese Destroyers of WWII: Quantity is a Quality of it's own, it can also be a Decisive one
    26:24New guns consumed industrial capacity and logistical effortNotable Point
  3. Bruships 264: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    1:51:01Improving Bismarck with a dual-purpose secondary batteryQ&A
  4. Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:44:06Design 1047: unfinished plans and the Scharnhorst comparisonQ&A
  5. Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    1:09:12Refit mounts that penetrate Hood's strength deckQ&A
  6. Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    2:17:22Modernised 4.7-inch and 155 mm destroyer gunsQ&A
  7. Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    25:07Tiger cruiser armament and a distinct secondary batteryQ&A
  8. Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    3:30:04A Cadorna-sized destroyer with multiple 5.5-inch gunsQ&A
  9. Air Defence At Sea: From Air Ships in 1906, to drones in 2026 and everything in between...
    1:36:40Separate anti-aircraft batteries or dual-purpose guns?Q&A
  10. Bruships 244: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:36:32Yamato dual-purpose secondary battery tradeoffQ&A
  11. Bruships 239: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    23:19S-boats in the Thames EstuaryQ&A
  12. Dutch Destroyers in WWII: The Free Dutch navy at it's Freeest?
    7:55Isaac Sweers completed and rearmed in BritainChapter
  13. What if the Royal Navy's Aircraft Carrier HMS Hermes had sisters in the 1920s? (Patreon Live)
    2:06:13Which heavy anti-aircraft gun suits a carrier?Q&A
  14. Scuttlebutt 18: Guns & Points of Order
    1:49Why the Royal Navy fielded so many gun calibresQ&A
  15. Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:16:56Disagreement over Somers’ Mark 22 antiaircraft capabilityQ&A
  16. Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:34:54Refitting Hindenburg for Allied serviceQ&A
  17. Scuttlebutt 14: Aircraft Carriers
    14:22A 5.3-inch US dual-purpose cruiser for carrier warQ&A
  18. More Lessons of Never Built Carriers
    10:18The Royal Navy's unrealized 1931 carrier studyChapter
  19. Scuttlebutt 13: Questions on Battleships
    43:57What an earlier integrated Royal Navy staff might changeQ&A
  20. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle
    35:28Dual-purpose secondary guns for a redesigned 1915 fleetQ&A
  21. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle
    5:41:18Refitting First World War cruisers for useful wartime serviceQ&A
  22. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…
    1:06:36What if the 5.25-inch gun achieved 12 rounds per minute in 1930?Q&A
  23. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…
    3:41:37Testing an F3-inspired alternative to King George VChapter
  24. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…
    8:25:38A qualitative-only treaty transforms British carrier developmentChapter
  25. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…
    8:27:17Would earlier carrier construction give destroyers dual-purpose guns?Q&A
  26. Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust
    2:17:36Eight automatic six-inch guns versus twelve conventional barrelsQ&A
  27. Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II
    1:54:12Why the US 5-inch/38 succeeded as a complete systemNotable Point
  28. Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II
    2:19:56Why Britain did not standardize on a four-inch dual-purpose gunQ&A
  29. Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II
    2:30:09Pairing a dual-purpose destroyer gun with fire controlNotable Point
  30. Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II
    2:31:31Why better guns leave France and Germany's larger problems intactNotable Point
  31. Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II
    2:36:08Spreading better dual-purpose guns across Commonwealth escortsNotable Point
  32. Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II
    2:49:39Why Britain's preferred dual-purpose guns still complicated supplyNotable Point
  33. Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II
    9:18:44Why Britain chose 5.25-inch instead of 5.5-inch gunsQ&A
  34. What happens if the X-1 Cruiser Submarine becomes genesis not a dockyard queen?
    39:59Carriers gain heavier defenses against surface attacksNotable Point
  35. Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?
    47:24Visualizing a late-1920s F3 developmentNotable Point
  36. Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?
    48:02Continued building advances British gunneryNotable Point
  37. Bruships 213 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:14:20Kearsarge's technology shock may delay warNotable Point
  38. #2Historians Live: With @Drachinifel comes to chat & build UAD Dreadnoughts that Almost were P3
    54:44An 80,000-ton American Pacific battleshipChapter
  39. Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:08:18Fast destroyers and minelayers for Norway's fjordsNotable Point
  40. Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:14:29An Omaha refit for Norwegian coastal defenceNotable Point
  41. Bruships 210: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:59:56Why 125 mm did not become a wartime destroyer standardQ&A
  42. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    3:50Japan's 100 mm gun and the air-defense tradeoffChapter
  43. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    6:21Why torpedoes did not remove the need for destroyer gunfireNotable Point
  44. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    24:54Britain's 4.5-inch path to a true dual-purpose gunChapter
  45. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    30:19The 4.5-inch Mark V: powered loading and barrel lifeNotable Point
  46. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    35:51How Swedish ships divided surface and air targetsNotable Point
  47. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    48:22The missed high-angle future of the British 4.7-inchNotable Point
  48. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    1:02:01Dutch Bofors guns for East Indies operationsChapter
  49. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    1:06:28Why the 5-inch/38 succeeded as a complete systemChapter
  50. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    1:07:49Why the 5-inch/38 needed a new barrel designNotable Point
  51. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    1:15:23Germany's 127 mm gun and the deployment gapChapter
  52. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    1:38:34Germany's 150 mm destroyers as a failed cruiser shortcutChapter
  53. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    1:48:44The decisive advantage was the whole gun systemNotable Point
  54. Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:25:04How treaty wording leaves room for a heavily armed sloopNotable Point
  55. Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    5:33:17A 1919 cruiser's secondary guns and destroyer developmentNotable Point
  56. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    1:01Why the early 4.5-inch mount was difficult for destroyersChapter
  57. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    7:03The alternate history requires a 1935 service-ready gunChapter
  58. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    10:104.7-inch and 4.5-inch performance depended on the mountChapter
  59. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    15:15A hybrid mount could make the 4.5-inch gun practicalChapter
  60. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    20:02Standardization spreads beyond the Tribal classChapter
  61. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    24:26Could 4.5-inch guns replace the 5.25-inch battery?Chapter
  62. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    28:38A ubiquitous British dual-purpose gunNotable Point
  63. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    33:10An all-4.5-inch Dido could trade shell weight for gun densityNotable Point
  64. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    37:11Narvik and Gurkha show the tactical value of high elevationChapter
  65. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    41:43How heavy anti-aircraft fire disrupts an air strikeChapter
  66. Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:32:09Were Royal Navy warships undergunned?Q&A
  67. Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:19:42A J3 Hood, dual-purpose secondaries, and higher treaty limitsQ&A
  68. Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:04:04Destroyer layouts in UAD and Rule the Waves 3Q&A
  69. Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:58:12An early 5.25-inch dual-purpose gun standardizes the Royal NavyQ&A
  70. Bruships 198: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:46:31Britain was approaching an autoloading 4.5-inch mount before the warQ&A
  71. Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?
    11:39The Dido requirement was fleet screeningChapter
  72. Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?
    35:18Why the Atlanta duplicated destroyer capabilityChapter
  73. Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?
    43:14Universal guns traded experimentation for logisticsNotable Point
  74. Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?
    46:24CL-154 pushed the screening cruiser much furtherNotable Point
  75. Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?
    1:05:15Didos came of age in Mediterranean fleet warfareChapter
  76. Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?
    1:09:16Why the 5.25-inch gun reached useful cruiser fighting rangesNotable Point
  77. Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?
    1:34:09Tiger and Worcester carried the screening-cruiser legacyChapter
  78. Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?
    1:36:06Worcester combined heavy screening fire with complex mountingsNotable Point
  79. 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?
    1:20:39Exercise bias shaped the Tribal class's anti-aircraft tradeoffsChapter
  80. 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?
    1:25:37Was the 4.7-inch gun itself a poor anti-aircraft weapon?Q&A
  81. Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?
    16:12Why an early AA cruiser could age badlyNotable Point
  82. Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?
    20:37A possible 4.7-inch armament for an earlier AA cruiserNotable Point
  83. Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?
    31:29The Dido class as screening cruisersChapter
  84. Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?
    49:46How did Dido and Atlanta compare in combat power?Q&A
  85. Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?
    52:14Armament shortages changed early Dido completionsNotable Point
  86. Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?
    54:44Dido's place in a destroyer attack and carrier screenChapter
  87. Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?
    2:45:11Were heavy AA cruisers worth building?Chapter
  88. Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?
    2:49:25What if automatic dual-purpose 6-inch guns had arrived earlier?Notable Point
  89. Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?
    3:14:06Would the 5-inch/54 have prolonged Atlanta production?Q&A
  90. Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:09:52Which historical warship design error should be prevented?Q&A
  91. Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:55:09Why the US Navy's 5.4-inch gun went nowhereQ&A
  92. Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:00:25Cold War dual-purpose guns retained a surface-fire roleNotable Point
  93. Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:05:09What a US 5.4-inch gun would changeQ&A
  94. Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:11:06A British 5.5-inch dual-purpose gun pathNotable Point
  95. Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...
    4:32:25Why Germany struggled with a 12.5 cm dual-purpose gunQ&A
  96. Leadership Alive: What happens if Adm R. Henderson & Adm W. Fisher Live through WWII?
    43:28A large L class could anticipate the Battle-class destroyerNotable Point
  97. Bruships 187: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    46:20Why the L-class 120 mm mount had widely spaced gunsQ&A
  98. From Mary Rose to Victory, How & Why Construction of the Wooden Wall changed... Naval History Live
    1:51:03A 5.5-inch standard could have reshaped British batteriesNotable Point
  99. Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:51:54Armament choices for Admiral-class carrier conversionsQ&A
  100. Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:28:28The 5-inch gun was the practical destroyer ceilingQ&A
  101. Bruships 178: Naval History or Exercise
    5:12Six-inch dual-purpose guns and barrel-life tradeoffsQ&A
  102. Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?
    1:10:50Why the King George V class retained its 5.25-inch Mark I systemQ&A
  103. Frigating in WWII for the Allies: HMAS Diamantina & the River Class Frigates
    50:35Operating the manual high-angle 4-inch mountingNotable Point
  104. Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/4
    2:11:01Why Independence-class carriers lacked a 5-inch batteryQ&A
  105. Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/4
    2:14:33Possible reasons for an escort carrier's single 5-inch mountingNotable Point
  106. Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/4
    1:16:59Why HMS Vanguard was unlikely to receive US 5-inch gunsQ&A
  107. Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/4
    1:40:57What a viable 6-inch dual-purpose gun would requireQ&A
  108. Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/4
    2:13:43Capitani Romani guns could simplify a Littorio secondary batteryQ&A
  109. Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/4
    2:35:48How dual-purpose batteries divide air and surface threatsQ&A
  110. Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/4
    2:40:34Why the Royal Navy did not standardize one dual-purpose gunQ&A
  111. Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/4
    5:01:00The consequences of common German-Italian naval armamentQ&A
  112. Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/4
    6:17:33A quick-firing 130 mm gun makes rebuild weight the limiting factorQ&A
  113. Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax
    8:17How a British 130 mm gun could reshape the Dido classQ&A
  114. Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax
    48:37Why a 60-caliber 5.1-inch gun brings diminishing returnsQ&A
  115. Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax
    1:18:01A 4.7-inch test mount would not make the 130 mm gun interchangeableQ&A
  116. Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax
    1:35:08Why Britain preferred 4.5-inch to 4.7-inch dual-purpose gunsQ&A
  117. Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax
    1:44:24Why a British 130 mm gun would probably stay 130 mmQ&A
  118. Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax
    1:56:44Mount performance matters more than caliber against fast jetsQ&A
  119. Bruships 169: Kalax o Kalax, my kingdom for a Kalax...
    58:11The early US 6-inch dual-purpose gun was ahead of its timeQ&A
  120. Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...
    2:26:13Could carrier limits accelerate a dual-purpose 6-inch gun?Q&A
  121. Scuttlebutt 5: Some Tremendous Questions & Frustrations!
    43:20Why Royal Navy anti-aircraft standardisation laggedQ&A
  122. The Current Carrier Generation: War is over/War has yet to begin
    50:49Why peacetime exercises can mislead force designNotable Point
  123. Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!
    12:35Why KGV's 5.25-inch guns were not simply wasted weightQ&A
  124. Bruships 159: New Office - This may be quick, discord may work & I may not have a Pneumonia attack!
    1:15:57Why a light cruiser with only six 5-inch guns is a poor capital-ship escortQ&A
  125. Bruships 159: New Office - This may be quick, discord may work & I may not have a Pneumonia attack!
    1:26:01Why triple dual-purpose mounts bring more trouble than benefitQ&A
  126. Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?
    4:07:10Why plan a 6-inch anti-aircraft cruiser?Q&A
  127. Carriers of the Planned War Fleets: How Shokaku, Implacables & Essexs reflect their Navys Doctrines
    13:09What Shokaku gained over HiryuNotable Point
  128. Carriers of the Planned War Fleets: How Shokaku, Implacables & Essexs reflect their Navys Doctrines
    41:53Implacable's anti-aircraft batteries and uncertain countsNotable Point
  129. Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!
    1:31:36Henderson's larger Royal Navy destroyerQ&A
  130. Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!
    2:41:42Designing a battleship in a peaceful 1942Q&A
  131. Bruships 152: Patreon July Premiers Announcement, Special Guests & Naval History Questions Answered
    2:49:54Checking the premise of a British 5-inch gun questionQ&A
  132. Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion
    24:24Lexington's eight-inch guns and the case for escortsNotable Point
  133. Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends
    2:47:59Why the Royal Navy split its dual-purpose gun effortQ&A
  134. The Furious Age: The First Aircraft Carriers
    43:29Useful volume and simpler armament define design efficiencyNotable Point
  135. Bruships 144: Some Books(Can't Find Lego Cam Sorry) & Naval History Questions
    1:12:52What it takes to give a Tribal class heavier torpedoesQ&A
  136. Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London
    2:15:00Larger carrier fleets expose differences in pilot replacementChapter
  137. Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books
    44:26How higher treaty limits reshape the Tribal classQ&A
  138. Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books
    2:04:10An 8,000-ton Japanese dual-purpose cruiser proposalQ&A
  139. Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered
    59:28Turning the Spähkreuzer into an AA cruiserQ&A
  140. Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!
    14:56A 3,000-ton Tribal-class destroyer leaderQ&A
  141. Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!
    3:51:32What 3,000-ton British destroyers could carryQ&A
  142. Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!
    4:20:11Deutschland had no easy displacement left for more speedQ&A
  143. Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!
    4:24:57The 4.5-inch Mark 5 offered a strong dual-purpose baselineQ&A
  144. Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!
    3:28:39Why an automatic 6-inch gun could displace the 5.25-inch caliberQ&A
  145. Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered
    16:38Italian dual-purpose gun choicesQ&A
  146. Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered
    1:26:06Why Germany did not adopt its 5-inch dual-purpose gun soonerQ&A
  147. Check Campaign 3: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign
    25:15Could Britain have chosen a better dual-purpose gun route?Q&A
  148. Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered
    3:30:12Why destroyers avoided a single 5.25-inch gunQ&A
  149. Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time
    31:14A 4.5-inch Dido trades range for volume rather than transforming battlesQ&A
  150. Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō
    31:12A more viable forward aviation shipNotable Point
  151. Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō
    36:37Ryūjō's treaty-driven design and stability problemsChapter
  152. Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books
    1:23:42Why a German 5-inch dual-purpose battery was unlikelyQ&A
  153. Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books
    2:17:38Fixing the British triple 4-inch mount for dual-purpose useQ&A
  154. Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books
    2:21:40Nelson's high secondary mounts began with a dual-purpose ideaQ&A
  155. Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books
    2:32:19What Repulse needed from an anti-aircraft refitQ&A
  156. What Happens If Whittle is supported & Britain develops Jet Engines + Gas Turbines in 1930s
    41:52Lighter machinery could preserve the original Tribal dual-purpose turretNotable Point
  157. Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!
    16:02Mount weight kept the 4.5-inch gun off the Tribal classQ&A
  158. Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!
    30:17A workable 4.5-inch mount would close the Tribal class's high-angle gapQ&A
  159. Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!
    2:58:42Daring-class plans would give 1934 Britain technology it could actually buildQ&A
  160. Patreon 91: Flower class sloops: The most key ship of the 20th century?
    2:17:40How sustained sloop building could aid destroyersQ&A
  161. HMS Diamond(1950) D35: Presence without Conviction is no Detterence - Key Ship Series 7 Ship 8
    24:16The Daring class's 4.5-inch dual-purpose batteryChapter
  162. Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History
    1:08:40Why secondary guns were not the easy autoloader targetQ&A
  163. Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History
    1:32:58The Tiger class Mark 26 six-inch mountingChapter
  164. Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History
    2:15:32Why the Tiger class stopped at two twin turretsQ&A
  165. HMS Enterprise: Tell Me Where You Need Your Royals or Gold Delivered - Key Ships Series 7 Ship 5
    56:08What continued E-class building might have changedNotable Point
  166. HMS Warspite: The Survivor - KSS3 S3 Comment Response
    6:28How a 28-knot Warspite could reinforce carrier hunting groupsNotable Point
  167. The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response
    38:46A wartime G3 would carry stronger antiaircraft defensesQ&A
  168. Bruships 131: Battleships...
    48:10The fleet effects of a successful British five-inch gunQ&A
  169. Bruships 130: Battleships
    18:19How foreknowledge could redirect Royal Navy designsQ&A
  170. Bruships 130: Battleships
    35:50Choosing between 100 mm and 10.5 cm dual-purpose gunsQ&A
  171. Bruships 130: Battleships
    1:42:36Replacing Scharnhorst's 15 cm battery with 10.5 cm gunsQ&A
  172. Patreon 88: Sydney Strategy: When looking for a Far East Naval Base - what if Sydney not Singapore?
    2:06:08A slimmer King George V favors 4.5-inch gunsNotable Point
  173. Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 7
    34:47All-forward guns shaped Dunkerque's protection and firepowerChapter
  174. Scylla & Charybdis: 4.5in gun Didos - Key Ships Reserve Series, Ship 1
    6:01A Dido hull reshaped around 4.5-inch mountsNotable Point
  175. Scylla & Charybdis: 4.5in gun Didos - Key Ships Reserve Series, Ship 1
    10:03An emergency answer to the 5.25-inch shortageChapter
  176. Scylla & Charybdis: 4.5in gun Didos - Key Ships Reserve Series, Ship 1
    24:49What a successful dual-purpose mount might have changedNotable Point
  177. Scylla & Charybdis: 4.5in gun Didos - Key Ships Reserve Series, Ship 1
    37:14A useful anti-aircraft cruiser used in the wrong fightNotable Point
  178. Bruships 124: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series
    1:53:39A dual-purpose gun's ammunition choicesQ&A
  179. Bruships 124: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series
    2:11:07The Tribal class's high-angle air-defence weaknessQ&A
  180. Bruships 124: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series
    3:06:09Naval technologies to prioritize in the 1930sQ&A
  181. Bittern Class: The Foundation Stone of the British WWII ASW efforts - Key Ship Series 5, Episode 10
    22:51The four-inch battery could serve above and on the waterNotable Point
  182. Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!
    3:22:53Where an autoloading 5.25-inch destroyer gun would fitQ&A
  183. H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 4
    19:10Why split secondary batteries consume a shipNotable Point
  184. H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 4
    22:15Ignoring useful foreign naval solutionsNotable Point
  185. Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?
    2:15:23Why some navies retained mixed secondary batteriesQ&A
  186. Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?
    3:11:57Turning the 4.7-inch mount into a true dual-purpose weaponQ&A
  187. Meeting HMAS Vampire!
    1:39The Daring class as a Tribal successorNotable Point
  188. The Shipwreck Museum - The Destroyer Models #NavHistAus 2
    0:09Dual-purpose guns make a flexible destroyerNotable Point
  189. A 13.5in gun Dreadnought? Would it work?
    1:51:46Hood and the potential of the 5.5-inch gunNotable Point
  190. Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...
    45:47What if Tribal-class destroyers had dual-purpose 5.5-inch guns?Q&A
  191. Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...
    2:46:01Did Britain pursue an autoloading 6-inch anti-aircraft cruiser?Q&A
  192. Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...
    2:46:18Could 4.5-inch guns on King George V have helped the Didos?Q&A
  193. Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...
    3:19:15What would an autoloading 5.25-inch super-destroyer resemble?Q&A
  194. Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done
    17:46What a modernised Bismarck would demandNotable Point
  195. Chilean Civil War & the sinking of the Blanco Encalada
    15:47Would a rebuilt Tribal-class destroyer be historically exact?Q&A
  196. Starting with Building HMS Thunderchild...
    37:13A light cruiser built around massed 5.5-inch fireChapter
  197. Starting with Building HMS Thunderchild...
    2:32:38Destroyer air defence is limited by space and arcsNotable Point
  198. Alternate History - Royal Navy retains the Fleet 'units' of Royal Naval Air Service: Patreon 76
    2:03:12Carrier experience drives better destroyer air defenceNotable Point
  199. Alternate History - Royal Navy retains the Fleet 'units' of Royal Naval Air Service: Patreon 76
    3:09:16Why battleships remain broadly recognisableQ&A
  200. Bruships 106: Song Dynasty & Three New Books from Pen & Sword
    1:21:16Three more peacetime years reshape carriers and destroyer armamentQ&A
  201. If the January 1939 Tsingtao incident leads to war... Comment Response
    7:06Why a 6-inch heavy-AA battery was unlikelyQ&A
  202. USS Wichita: Comment Response
    27:25Royal Navy light-cruiser production tradeoffsNotable Point
  203. USS Wichita: Comment Response
    35:06Wichita's 5-inch battery and a 15,000-ton counterfactualNotable Point
  204. Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-65
    48:50Existing 4.7-inch weapons exposed a missed opportunityNotable Point
  205. Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-65
    51:22Universal dual-purpose guns needed usable mountsNotable Point
  206. Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-65
    1:13:10Japanese gun standardization could only narrow the gapQ&A
  207. Bruships 98: Steam Engines (both maritime and rail), random & naval questions
    2:12:10A naval gun's mount can matter more than its caliberQ&A
  208. Bruships 98: Steam Engines (both maritime and rail), random & naval questions
    2:15:57A quarter-inch caliber increase magnified mount demandsQ&A
  209. Bruships 97: Random Books, Naval Chat & Possibly the Sound of Rain
    1:05:10A 5.5-inch dual-purpose gun could arm cruisers and large destroyersQ&A
  210. New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...
    40:57A modern dual-purpose six-inch gun is technically feasibleQ&A
  211. Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat
    3:10:13Testing six-inch dual-purpose guns on a Brooklyn hullQ&A
  212. Bruships 95: Science Fiction, Including Paddle 'Corn Oil' (Aka BioDiesel) Battleship Twist...
    22:03Dual-purpose guns and the limits of improving ABDACOMQ&A
  213. Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat
    2:15:03Three pieces of battleship advice for the Admiralty in 1912Q&A
  214. Sverdlov Class: Comment Response
    56:19How more Sverdlovs could have reshaped British gun cruisersNotable Point
  215. Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"
    3:22:54Anti-aircraft armament for a 28,000-ton fast battlecruiserQ&A
  216. Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 4
    2:19:44The Dido class shows ships designed around a weaponQ&A
  217. Bruships 89: New Books (Christmas Recomendations) & Personal Accounts of War
    2:14:28A dual-purpose gun refit for HMS HermesQ&A
  218. Abruzzi Class: Condottieri of the Regia Marina
    13:02A balanced light cruiser instead of a speed specialistChapter
  219. Brooklyn Class: The Not Quite Last US Treaty Era Cruisers
    6:58Turret arcs and secondary guns shape the cruiserNotable Point
  220. Brooklyn Class: The Not Quite Last US Treaty Era Cruisers
    35:00Savannah's changing fittings demand date-aware identificationNotable Point
  221. Brooklyn Class: The Not Quite Last US Treaty Era Cruisers
    1:07:35St. Louis shows the mature Brooklyn designChapter
  222. 19th Century Cruisers: Comment Response Video 3 (Sfax - Geffion)
    31:44Dual-purpose guns designed for the wrong attack geometryQ&A
  223. Patreon 63: Escort carriers, the idea, designs, development and notable operations
    40:52Why naval anti-aircraft fire did not need a killChapter
  224. Patreon 63: Escort carriers, the idea, designs, development and notable operations
    2:49:29Why Japan's 25 mm AA gun underperformedQ&A
  225. Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1941-42
    13:57Rapid aircraft development outpaced naval air defenceQ&A
  226. Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 2
    2:29:23The 4.5-inch gun Britain most needed in 1936Q&A
  227. New Orleans Class: US Treaty Era Cruisers
    21:55The five-inch/25 as the interwar heavy anti-aircraft gunNotable Point
  228. Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-40
    49:07Why the Atlanta class offered a better fleet-wide gun systemQ&A
  229. Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-40
    52:51A 4.5-inch standard weapon for the Royal NavyQ&A
  230. Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-40
    1:12:00A 4.5-inch dual-purpose battery for Tribal-class destroyersQ&A
  231. Major Allied Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 1939
    49:53Removing radar, turbine, and gun-production bottlenecksNotable Point
  232. Suffren Class: Mon croiseur de 1ère classe de la Marine Nationale préféré (Long Patrol)
    23:35From Suffren's 75 mm guns to the class's 90 mm batteryChapter
  233. Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)
    3:02:26Why a fire-support gunboat should not be disguised as a sloopQ&A
  234. My Royal Navy Washington Treaty Cruiser: with added Qs from "1939 Destroyer Doctrine" (Long Patrol)
    46:36A dual-purpose gun upgrade for the Tribal classQ&A
  235. Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...
    50:06Why the 4.5-inch gun won the postwar lineageQ&A
  236. British Light Cruisers & Treaties: A UAD Infused discussion
    5:00Why the Royal Navy retained six-inch cruisersNotable Point
  237. Operation Tan No.2 (77yrs ago today)
    2:35:50A heavily armed convoy escort depends on the warQ&A
  238. Siege of Corfu (1798–1799): 223 yrs ago today
    3:13:04Would Super Lion need a larger anti-aircraft battery?Q&A
  239. Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment
    2:44:09A treaty-compliant redesign of the Nagato classQ&A
  240. Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment
    3:07:19Why the Admiral Hipper class kept specialized secondary gunsQ&A
  241. Bruships 71: Hobbs on the Fleet Air Arm in Europe & Other cool books
    3:28:18The useful calibre range for dual-purpose secondary gunsQ&A
  242. Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney
    1:45:32Q&A: what were Renown's 4.5-inch guns for?Q&A
  243. What a the choice of Secondary gun calibre tells us: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)
    8:48Rate of fire against destroyers and torpedo boatsNotable Point
  244. What a the choice of Secondary gun calibre tells us: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)
    23:17Why independent surface raiders accumulate gunsNotable Point
  245. What a the choice of Secondary gun calibre tells us: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)
    25:34G3's layered gun and torpedo batteryNotable Point
  246. Bruships 69: The Decider
    23:59A common 4.5-inch battery across the fleetQ&A
  247. Bruships 69: The Decider
    38:43Why a triple 6-inch turret was not ready for 5.25-inch gunsQ&A
  248. A Historical Possibility: Triple Turret Potentiality UAD - HMS Queen Mary 3 (Long Patrol)
    21:17A successful anti-ship mounting may resist dual-purpose conversionNotable Point
  249. Bruships 68: Random Naval History Books & Questions
    24:09Why the Royal Navy favoured 4.7- and 4.5-inch gunsNotable Point
  250. Bruships 68: Random Naval History Books & Questions
    27:44US 5-inch/38 and British 4.5-inch design prioritiesQ&A
  251. Bruships 68: Random Naval History Books & Questions
    37:21The Royal Navy's attempt to standardize secondary gunsNotable Point
  252. Bruships 68: Random Naval History Books & Questions
    38:36Why Japan lacked an ideal destroyer gunQ&A
  253. Patreon 43: "Unverified stories of Norwegian Campaign: Tall Tales of Tribals"
    2:46:24The 4.5-inch upper-deck mount the Tribals arrived too early to receiveQ&A
  254. Patreon 43: "Unverified stories of Norwegian Campaign: Tall Tales of Tribals"
    3:21:53Why later Tribals gave way to the Battle classQ&A
  255. Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru
    2:46:02What a modernized HMS Tiger might carryQ&A
  256. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (10)
    2:49:09A Royal Navy without pre-war weapon-development delaysQ&A
  257. Quirky Classes and What they tell us about their navies… (Live)
    45:51Why smaller dual-purpose guns suited carriers betterQ&A
  258. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)
    1:41:16Why the E-class did not receive a new main batteryQ&A
  259. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (9)
    1:51:46Why the 4.5-inch gun made a better dual-purpose weaponQ&A
  260. My G3/N3 Dreadnought Battleship + Battle Cruiser = Fast Battleship Design
    10:53A 1920s six-inch dual-purpose secondary batteryNotable Point
  261. Bruships 61 - Ship Design; Sci-fi, Wooden & Steel, and some Naval History Questions
    4:07:46Why Tribal destroyers missed the intended dual-purpose batteryQ&A
  262. 21 Christmas Books for 2021 - Bruships 59: Books & Naval History Chat
    28:54Carrier guns should support the carrier roleQ&A
  263. Patreon 32: Japanese heavy cruisers of the 1920s & 1930s, were they worth it?
    2:41:27Why 3-inch guns offered a useful anti-aircraft compromiseQ&A
  264. Patreon 32: Japanese heavy cruisers of the 1920s & 1930s, were they worth it?
    3:09:07A three-triple-turret alternative to five twinsQ&A
  265. Shipbuilding through the 1880s-1950s
    2:15:21What earlier 4.5-inch guns could have changedNotable Point
  266. Chiefs of Staff of the Axis Navies: (Long Patrol) P1/14: Erich Raeder
    23:22Procurement complexity versus a sustainable raiding fleetNotable Point
  267. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (5)
    2:53:50Single versus twin five-inch mounts on aircraft carriersQ&A
  268. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (5)
    2:58:41Modernising Schlesien for continued serviceQ&A
  269. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (4)
    2:19:24Tribal-class destroyers with 4.5-inch dual-purpose gunsQ&A
  270. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (4)
    4:14:46The 5-inch/38 and British 4.5-inch gunQ&A
  271. Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions
    1:17:23Twenty dual-purpose six-inch guns demand beam and deck spaceQ&A
  272. Some More Battle Cruisers
    48:59Lexington's machinery and range suit a Pacific battlecruiserChapter
  273. Bruships 46: Accounts of Naval War
    37:10When mixed secondary batteries made senseQ&A
  274. Bruships 46: Accounts of Naval War
    1:07:54Do six-inch guns still have a place at sea?Q&A
  275. Crown Colony Class Long Patrol: Part 4 Ceylon to Newfoundland
    2:17How technology forecasts shaped Crown Colony cruiser designChapter
  276. Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects
    3:00:38Why the Royal Navy chose the 4.5-inch gunQ&A
  277. Town Class Part 2 of 7: Contruction
    35:36Gun-cycle averages behind cruiser procurementChapter
  278. RN Paper Cruisers; the what might have beens…
    26:35Why the 5.25-inch gun was a temporary compromiseQ&A
  279. RN Paper Cruisers; the what might have beens…
    1:39:09Neptune stretched the meaning of light cruiserChapter
  280. Bruships 24 - An Autobiography from War
    1:09:51Why Tribals did not simply receive 4.5-inch dual-purpose gunsQ&A
  281. Battle of Trafalgar & it's Legacy
    2:32:08Why Tribals paired heavy guns with quadruple torpedoesQ&A
  282. Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5b Introduction to Patreon Video 4
    10:34Rearming reserve cruisers for the Pacific emergencyNotable Point
  283. Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5b Introduction to Patreon Video 4
    16:33Could E-class cruisers carry a mixed battery?Notable Point
  284. Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5b Introduction to Patreon Video 4
    24:48Hawkins hulls offer room for a heavier conversionChapter
  285. An Introduction to What was paid for in Blood, in Sweat, in Tears & so much Money... Part 3 of 3
    17:25Exercise incentives concealed air-defence weaknessesChapter
  286. Bru Ships Episode 3: Imperial Japanese Navy Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A
    1:13:21A peacetime 1942 Royal Navy under Reginald HendersonQ&A
  287. Bru Ships Episode 3: Imperial Japanese Navy Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A
    2:22:07Why the Town class did not need 4.5-inch secondary gunsQ&A
  288. Bru Ships Episode 3: Imperial Japanese Navy Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A
    3:20:16Comparing British 4-inch, 4.5-inch, 4.7-inch, and 5.25-inch gunsQ&A
  289. An Introduction To Battle Cruisers
    23:52Reconstruction left Renown and Repulse at different stagesChapter
  290. Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers - A live stream
    19:26Deck-penetrating turrets shaped the Battle-class layoutChapter