Video

Operation Tan No.2 (77yrs ago today)

Study Operation Tan No.2 (77yrs ago today), a Dr. Alex Clarke video from 11 Mar 2022, with 60 time notes. Topics include Imperial Japanese Navy, Kamikaze, Naval Aviation.

Date
Runtime3:00:11
Guide points60 time notes

Time notes

  1. 3:38
    Operation Tan No. 2 and decisive-battle thinking

    Operation Tan No. 2 grew from Japan's continuing search for a decisive fleet blow even as its strategic position collapsed.

    Chapter
  2. 11:05
    A reconnaissance chain with modern strike-warfare lessons

    Tan No. 2 illustrates why a long-range strike depends on finding the enemy before launching the attack.

    Notable Point
  3. 15:32
    From the first Majuro plan to Tan No. 1

    The earlier plans show a striking contraction from a carrier-and-land-air offensive to a proposed 54-aircraft raid on Majuro.

    Notable Point
  4. 21:21
    A successful strike could have delayed Okinawa

    One estimate gives a fully successful strike enough effect to delay Okinawa for months, while leaving Japan unable to win the war.

    Notable Point
  5. 22:20
    Escort production separated Britain from Japan in submarine war

    Britain's escort-building capacity helped it sustain defenses against submarines that Japan's smaller industrial effort could not match.

    Notable Point
  6. 23:55
    QuestionWas belief in continued victory confined to Japanese high command, or did civilians and servicemen also think the war could still be won?Answer

    Some probably noticed the shrinking defensive perimeter, but information control and limited geographical knowledge complicated that judgment. Believing the war was going badly did not necessarily mean believing it was lost or acting accordingly.

    Q&A
  7. 26:16
    QuestionDid Japanese planners understand that British armored carriers were designed to withstand the kinds of attacks being made against them?Answer

    Not fully, and German and Italian claims to have sunk several British carriers further confused the picture.

    Q&A
  8. 27:36
    Factionalism distorts Japanese naval command

    The failure to establish a clean chain of command left too many senior admirals competing for authority and credit.

    Notable Point
  9. 33:18
    QuestionHad planners forgotten how difficult American carriers were to sink?Answer

    American carriers had effective damage control, while their balance of protection, air-group size, speed, and ease of construction reflected a fleet built in much larger numbers.

    Q&A
  10. 34:38
    QuestionDid the Imperial Japanese Navy try to build ships outside the Japanese home islands, especially in resource-rich occupied territories?Answer

    Not to a significant degree. Singapore could have supported some construction and Korea could have hosted expanded yards, but money, policy, and a preference for employing Japanese workers limited that approach.

    Q&A
  11. 35:51
    QuestionDid Japanese planners understand radar, or did they simply ignore it when designing the attack?Answer

    They understood radar. Japan had its own equipment, and some supporting submarines were held up while radar was fitted.

    Q&A
  12. 37:01
    QuestionDid the Royal Navy believe its own publicity about an unsinkable Hood?Answer

    Public belief differed from the navy's professional assessment. Hood was a battlecruiser, and most unsinkability publicity did not originate with the Royal Navy.

    Q&A
  13. 38:43
    Why shallow-water torpedo attacks demanded special preparation

    Majuro offered stationary targets, but aerial torpedoes still needed room to run and a controlled water entry; Taranto worked because the Royal Navy had engineered for those constraints.

    Notable Point
  14. 41:56
    QuestionHow does Tan No. 2 compare with the single kamikaze that knocked USS Enterprise out of the war?Answer

    The Enterprise attacker displayed exceptional skill, and a maneuver possible for one aircraft could not simply be assumed for a force of 54.

    Q&A
  15. 42:21
    QuestionWere the Japanese planning to use Swordfish for a night attack?Answer

    No. A hypothetical Swordfish strike might have complicated American radar-directed defenses, but its prospects would need modelling and it was not the Japanese plan.

    Q&A
  16. 43:23
    Reconnaissance depends on the Nakajima C6N

    The fast C6N reconnaissance aircraft depended on maintenance support that was harder to provide away from its intended carrier environment.

    Notable Point
  17. 49:05
    Royal Navy experience supports Okinawa's night air defense

    British carriers helped coordinate night air defense around Okinawa because the Fleet Air Arm maintained a broader pool of crews practiced in night operations.

    Notable Point
  18. 52:25
    QuestionDid the Nakajima C6N have self-sealing fuel tanks, or was it highly vulnerable to fire?Answer

    Protective features were intended, but inconsistent production quality and the loss of Japanese design records make their real effectiveness difficult to establish.

    Q&A
  19. 54:28
    Ulithi replaces Majuro as the target

    The American move to Ulithi changed the target and required Japanese planners to confirm the carriers' location before a distant attack.

    Chapter
  20. 56:55
    Enterprise preservation depended on public support

    Enterprise's physical condition is considered adequate for preservation, while insufficient support is identified as the obstacle.

    Notable Point
  21. 57:22
    QuestionDid Japanese bombers have radar, even if their sets appeared primitive?Answer

    Japan had radar and ideas for developing it. Limited industrial capacity made widespread production and deployment the larger problem.

    Q&A
  22. 58:20
    QuestionWhen might China attack Ulithi?Answer

    No timing forecast is offered. The emphasis is on Ulithi's location in Micronesia and the value of securing access.

    Q&A
  23. 58:44
    QuestionDid the Royal Navy establish an Ulithi-like forward base of its own?Answer

    Not in the same form; it could use Ulithi when needed and instead relied on forward support from Australia and the Indian Ocean.

    Q&A
  24. 1:01:32
    Ugaki approves Tan No. 2

    Kamikaze attacks were treated as a potential war-winning weapon when Ugaki approved Tan No. 2 in early February 1945.

    Notable Point
  25. 1:03:17
    Reconnaissance losses before the raid

    Breakdowns and landing losses reduced seven reconnaissance aircraft to one flyable C6N, which found no carriers at Ulithi.

    Notable Point
  26. 1:08:10
    QuestionCould Ulithi still be used, and where would its supporting infrastructure come from?Answer

    Yes. Floating docks and other support facilities could be brought to the anchorage, as they were during the Second World War.

    Q&A
  27. 1:08:25
    QuestionDid Japan launch twin-engine aircraft from carriers?Answer

    There are competing reports about tests, but Japan did not properly implement an operational twin-engine carrier aircraft before the end of the war.

    Q&A
  28. 1:12:11
    A 24-aircraft strike with submarine support

    Tan No. 2 paired 24 P1Y attack aircraft with flying-boat pathfinders and submarines assigned to navigation, supply, and rescue.

    Chapter
  29. 1:14:38
    Dissent within naval high command

    Frank criticism within a naval command can restrain overconfident planning, though anecdotes about personal relationships require care.

    Notable Point
  30. 1:17:40
    Floating docks offered a higher-value target

    Attacking Ulithi's floating repair docks could have constrained carrier availability more effectively than chasing individual hulls.

    Notable Point
  31. 1:24:40
    American carrier production exposes the scale mismatch

    A 24-aircraft raid could not decisively affect a navy building dozens of Essex- and Midway-class carriers.

    Notable Point
  32. 1:29:15
    QuestionWhy not use the cargo submarine for the radio-beacon role?Answer

    The choice depended on which submarines could supply enough electrical power for the radio equipment.

    Q&A
  33. 1:29:36
    Sacrifice without decisive force

    The criticism of Tan No. 2 is ethical as well as operational: planners committed 72 aircrew without assembling a force capable of earning the promised result.

    Notable Point
  34. 1:31:13
    QuestionWhy did the Imperial Japanese Navy focus on fleet carriers rather than attacking tankers and other logistics ships?Answer

    Japanese officers considered logistics targets but struggled to implement that strategy, while doctrine and exercises kept pulling attention back to the climactic fleet battle.

    Q&A
  35. 1:33:23
    Why the H8K Emily suited the pathfinder role

    The H8K Emily's armament and long range suited the pathfinder role; the range figures suggest, without establishing, which variant was used.

    Notable Point
  36. 1:37:13
    QuestionWhat if Japan had concentrated its kamikaze aircraft in one effort and given pilots freedom to select targets?Answer

    It could have been considerably more dangerous and might have inflicted much heavier losses on Allied shipping.

    Q&A
  37. 1:38:01
    Submarine logistics and unreliable reconnaissance

    Antenna failure, severe weather, and enemy air activity delayed I-366's delivery to the vulnerable reconnaissance detachment at Truk.

    Notable Point
  38. 1:44:40
    QuestionWere the submarines reporting storms while carrying supplies on deck?Answer

    Yes. Weather reporting was part of their role, and the spares and fuel they carried were essential to keeping the reconnaissance aircraft flying.

    Q&A
  39. 1:45:13
    March reconnaissance fixes the attack date

    March reconnaissance finally found carriers at Ulithi, but losing the surviving C6N would have ended the reconnaissance effort.

    Notable Point
  40. 1:46:50
    I-58 is diverted from an imminent Iwo Jima attack

    Supporting Tan No. 2 pulled I-58 away from a kaiten attack only ninety minutes before its planned launch.

    Notable Point
  41. 1:47:16
    QuestionDid I-366 carry spares for the C6Ns?Answer

    Yes, together with special fuel and ordinary aviation fuel.

    Q&A
  42. 1:51:00
    The strike disintegrates before Ulithi

    Engine failures, crashes, weather, and navigation losses reduced the 24-aircraft force to only two arrivals at Ulithi.

    Chapter
  43. 2:00:15
    Randolph is hit, while the second aircraft crashes on Mogmog

    One P1Y struck USS Randolph; the other crashed beside a lighted baseball diamond on Mogmog Island, possibly after mistaking the diamond or its access road for a carrier.

    Notable Point
  44. 2:03:24
    Rapid repair limits the operational effect

    Ulithi's repair capacity returned USS Randolph to service for Okinawa within weeks, limiting the strike's strategic effect.

    Notable Point
  45. 2:07:33
    QuestionIs the ship alongside Randolph USS Vulcan (AR-5)?Answer

    Possibly, but the identification is uncertain because some photograph captions disagree.

    Q&A
  46. 2:12:31
    A proposed Dardanelles assault illustrates the need for sufficient force

    A counterfactual Dardanelles assault contrasts a concentrated attack with an operation too weak to achieve its objective.

    Notable Point
  47. 2:15:08
    Why Tan No. 2 was a Japanese defeat

    Calling the result inconclusive obscures the operational balance: Randolph returned quickly, while Japan lost scarce aircraft and crews largely to weather and mechanical failure.

    Notable Point
  48. 2:17:48
    QuestionHow long had the Japanese crews been flying before they reached Ulithi?Answer

    About eleven hours, from a 09:00 takeoff to an arrival around 20:00.

    Q&A
  49. 2:18:46
    QuestionWhat difference did the withdrawal of some American carriers make to the operation?Answer

    A substantial carrier force remained. Sinking all fifteen carriers cited in the response would have delayed American operations, although the delay was judged unlikely to last very long.

    Q&A
  50. 2:21:15
    QuestionWhat about the C6N's range from Tokyo with a drop tank?Answer

    The reconnaissance aircraft for this operation were operating from Truk, not Tokyo.

    Q&A
  51. 2:29:04
    Why Operation Tan No. 2 failed

    Engine failures and excessive distance undermined the raid, while successive abandoned plans left Tan No. 2 as the attack actually carried out.

    Chapter
  52. 2:32:56
    QuestionWhat was the morale effect of the kamikaze hit that put Enterprise out of action?Answer

    Putting Enterprise out of action had a morale effect, but her survival also strengthened her reputation.

    Q&A
  53. 2:34:06
    QuestionWhat replaced cordite in Royal Navy battleships and battlecruisers rebuilt after the First World War?Answer

    Other, improved grades of cordite rather than a wholly different propellant; SC appeared from 1927 and flashless Cordite NF was used during the Second World War.

    Q&A
  54. 2:35:50
    QuestionWould a 9,000-ton convoy-escort cruiser carrying seventy-five four-inch guns and eight torpedo tubes have been useful?Answer

    Potentially in the First World War or for early anti-aircraft work. For the Second World War, it would be more useful as an anti-aircraft cruiser with larger general-purpose guns around 4.5 to 5 inches.

    Q&A
  55. 2:38:59
    QuestionCould the Westland Wyvern have operated from an escort aircraft carrier?Answer

    Theoretically yes, probably with rocket-assisted takeoff and significant modifications to the aircraft and carrier.

    Q&A
  56. 2:41:19
    QuestionWas flashless cordite used in filming The Battle of the River Plate?Answer

    No. Flashless cordite was thought likely in the real battle, but not in the filming.

    Q&A
  57. 2:42:43
    QuestionWas the newer flashless cordite as energetic?Answer

    A modest reduction in energy per unit could be accepted to avoid revealing a ship at night, with a larger charge compensating where gun dimensions allowed it.

    Q&A
  58. 2:45:05
    QuestionHow would Tan No. 2 have fared against Royal Navy armored carriers?Answer

    Probably little damage, though an impact aft could still have had an effect.

    Q&A
  59. 2:52:43
    QuestionWhat nuclear-explosion yield would be equivalent to 112 tons of cordite?Answer

    No reliable figure is given. The cordite first has to be converted into TNT equivalent, and the calculation needs further research.

    Q&A
  60. 2:56:20
    QuestionCould a ship carry thousands of tons of cordite?Answer

    An offhand estimate suggests low thousands of tons for a battleship when charges for all its guns are included. The figures are recalled from memory, with a correction during the answer.

    Q&A