Video
Operation Tan No.2 (77yrs ago today)
Study Operation Tan No.2 (77yrs ago today), a Dr. Alex Clarke video from 11 Mar 2022, with 60 time notes. Topics include Imperial Japanese Navy, Kamikaze, Naval Aviation.
Time notes
- 3:38Operation Tan No. 2 and decisive-battle thinkingChapter
Operation Tan No. 2 grew from Japan's continuing search for a decisive fleet blow even as its strategic position collapsed.
- 11:05A reconnaissance chain with modern strike-warfare lessonsNotable Point
Tan No. 2 illustrates why a long-range strike depends on finding the enemy before launching the attack.
- 15:32From the first Majuro plan to Tan No. 1Notable Point
The earlier plans show a striking contraction from a carrier-and-land-air offensive to a proposed 54-aircraft raid on Majuro.
- 21:21A successful strike could have delayed OkinawaNotable Point
One estimate gives a fully successful strike enough effect to delay Okinawa for months, while leaving Japan unable to win the war.
- 22:20Escort production separated Britain from Japan in submarine warNotable Point
Britain's escort-building capacity helped it sustain defenses against submarines that Japan's smaller industrial effort could not match.
- 23:55QuestionWas belief in continued victory confined to Japanese high command, or did civilians and servicemen also think the war could still be won?AnswerQ&A
Some probably noticed the shrinking defensive perimeter, but information control and limited geographical knowledge complicated that judgment. Believing the war was going badly did not necessarily mean believing it was lost or acting accordingly.
- 26:16QuestionDid Japanese planners understand that British armored carriers were designed to withstand the kinds of attacks being made against them?AnswerQ&A
Not fully, and German and Italian claims to have sunk several British carriers further confused the picture.
- 27:36Factionalism distorts Japanese naval commandNotable Point
The failure to establish a clean chain of command left too many senior admirals competing for authority and credit.
- 33:18QuestionHad planners forgotten how difficult American carriers were to sink?AnswerQ&A
American carriers had effective damage control, while their balance of protection, air-group size, speed, and ease of construction reflected a fleet built in much larger numbers.
- 34:38QuestionDid the Imperial Japanese Navy try to build ships outside the Japanese home islands, especially in resource-rich occupied territories?AnswerQ&A
Not to a significant degree. Singapore could have supported some construction and Korea could have hosted expanded yards, but money, policy, and a preference for employing Japanese workers limited that approach.
- 35:51QuestionDid Japanese planners understand radar, or did they simply ignore it when designing the attack?AnswerQ&A
They understood radar. Japan had its own equipment, and some supporting submarines were held up while radar was fitted.
- 37:01QuestionDid the Royal Navy believe its own publicity about an unsinkable Hood?AnswerQ&A
Public belief differed from the navy's professional assessment. Hood was a battlecruiser, and most unsinkability publicity did not originate with the Royal Navy.
- 38:43Why shallow-water torpedo attacks demanded special preparationNotable Point
Majuro offered stationary targets, but aerial torpedoes still needed room to run and a controlled water entry; Taranto worked because the Royal Navy had engineered for those constraints.
- 41:56QuestionHow does Tan No. 2 compare with the single kamikaze that knocked USS Enterprise out of the war?AnswerQ&A
The Enterprise attacker displayed exceptional skill, and a maneuver possible for one aircraft could not simply be assumed for a force of 54.
- 42:21QuestionWere the Japanese planning to use Swordfish for a night attack?AnswerQ&A
No. A hypothetical Swordfish strike might have complicated American radar-directed defenses, but its prospects would need modelling and it was not the Japanese plan.
- 43:23Reconnaissance depends on the Nakajima C6NNotable Point
The fast C6N reconnaissance aircraft depended on maintenance support that was harder to provide away from its intended carrier environment.
- 49:05Royal Navy experience supports Okinawa's night air defenseNotable Point
British carriers helped coordinate night air defense around Okinawa because the Fleet Air Arm maintained a broader pool of crews practiced in night operations.
- 52:25QuestionDid the Nakajima C6N have self-sealing fuel tanks, or was it highly vulnerable to fire?AnswerQ&A
Protective features were intended, but inconsistent production quality and the loss of Japanese design records make their real effectiveness difficult to establish.
- 54:28Ulithi replaces Majuro as the targetChapter
The American move to Ulithi changed the target and required Japanese planners to confirm the carriers' location before a distant attack.
- 56:55Enterprise preservation depended on public supportNotable Point
Enterprise's physical condition is considered adequate for preservation, while insufficient support is identified as the obstacle.
- 57:22QuestionDid Japanese bombers have radar, even if their sets appeared primitive?AnswerQ&A
Japan had radar and ideas for developing it. Limited industrial capacity made widespread production and deployment the larger problem.
- 58:20QuestionWhen might China attack Ulithi?AnswerQ&A
No timing forecast is offered. The emphasis is on Ulithi's location in Micronesia and the value of securing access.
- 58:44QuestionDid the Royal Navy establish an Ulithi-like forward base of its own?AnswerQ&A
Not in the same form; it could use Ulithi when needed and instead relied on forward support from Australia and the Indian Ocean.
- 1:01:32Ugaki approves Tan No. 2Notable Point
Kamikaze attacks were treated as a potential war-winning weapon when Ugaki approved Tan No. 2 in early February 1945.
- 1:03:17Reconnaissance losses before the raidNotable Point
Breakdowns and landing losses reduced seven reconnaissance aircraft to one flyable C6N, which found no carriers at Ulithi.
- 1:08:10QuestionCould Ulithi still be used, and where would its supporting infrastructure come from?AnswerQ&A
Yes. Floating docks and other support facilities could be brought to the anchorage, as they were during the Second World War.
- 1:08:25QuestionDid Japan launch twin-engine aircraft from carriers?AnswerQ&A
There are competing reports about tests, but Japan did not properly implement an operational twin-engine carrier aircraft before the end of the war.
- 1:12:11A 24-aircraft strike with submarine supportChapter
Tan No. 2 paired 24 P1Y attack aircraft with flying-boat pathfinders and submarines assigned to navigation, supply, and rescue.
- 1:14:38Dissent within naval high commandNotable Point
Frank criticism within a naval command can restrain overconfident planning, though anecdotes about personal relationships require care.
- 1:17:40Floating docks offered a higher-value targetNotable Point
Attacking Ulithi's floating repair docks could have constrained carrier availability more effectively than chasing individual hulls.
- 1:24:40American carrier production exposes the scale mismatchNotable Point
A 24-aircraft raid could not decisively affect a navy building dozens of Essex- and Midway-class carriers.
- 1:29:15QuestionWhy not use the cargo submarine for the radio-beacon role?AnswerQ&A
The choice depended on which submarines could supply enough electrical power for the radio equipment.
- 1:29:36Sacrifice without decisive forceNotable Point
The criticism of Tan No. 2 is ethical as well as operational: planners committed 72 aircrew without assembling a force capable of earning the promised result.
- 1:31:13QuestionWhy did the Imperial Japanese Navy focus on fleet carriers rather than attacking tankers and other logistics ships?AnswerQ&A
Japanese officers considered logistics targets but struggled to implement that strategy, while doctrine and exercises kept pulling attention back to the climactic fleet battle.
- 1:33:23Why the H8K Emily suited the pathfinder roleNotable Point
The H8K Emily's armament and long range suited the pathfinder role; the range figures suggest, without establishing, which variant was used.
- 1:37:13QuestionWhat if Japan had concentrated its kamikaze aircraft in one effort and given pilots freedom to select targets?AnswerQ&A
It could have been considerably more dangerous and might have inflicted much heavier losses on Allied shipping.
- 1:38:01Submarine logistics and unreliable reconnaissanceNotable Point
Antenna failure, severe weather, and enemy air activity delayed I-366's delivery to the vulnerable reconnaissance detachment at Truk.
- 1:44:40QuestionWere the submarines reporting storms while carrying supplies on deck?AnswerQ&A
Yes. Weather reporting was part of their role, and the spares and fuel they carried were essential to keeping the reconnaissance aircraft flying.
- 1:45:13March reconnaissance fixes the attack dateNotable Point
March reconnaissance finally found carriers at Ulithi, but losing the surviving C6N would have ended the reconnaissance effort.
- 1:46:50I-58 is diverted from an imminent Iwo Jima attackNotable Point
Supporting Tan No. 2 pulled I-58 away from a kaiten attack only ninety minutes before its planned launch.
- 1:47:16QuestionDid I-366 carry spares for the C6Ns?AnswerQ&A
Yes, together with special fuel and ordinary aviation fuel.
- 1:51:00The strike disintegrates before UlithiChapter
Engine failures, crashes, weather, and navigation losses reduced the 24-aircraft force to only two arrivals at Ulithi.
- 2:00:15Randolph is hit, while the second aircraft crashes on MogmogNotable Point
One P1Y struck USS Randolph; the other crashed beside a lighted baseball diamond on Mogmog Island, possibly after mistaking the diamond or its access road for a carrier.
- 2:03:24Rapid repair limits the operational effectNotable Point
Ulithi's repair capacity returned USS Randolph to service for Okinawa within weeks, limiting the strike's strategic effect.
- 2:07:33QuestionIs the ship alongside Randolph USS Vulcan (AR-5)?AnswerQ&A
Possibly, but the identification is uncertain because some photograph captions disagree.
- 2:12:31A proposed Dardanelles assault illustrates the need for sufficient forceNotable Point
A counterfactual Dardanelles assault contrasts a concentrated attack with an operation too weak to achieve its objective.
- 2:15:08Why Tan No. 2 was a Japanese defeatNotable Point
Calling the result inconclusive obscures the operational balance: Randolph returned quickly, while Japan lost scarce aircraft and crews largely to weather and mechanical failure.
- 2:17:48QuestionHow long had the Japanese crews been flying before they reached Ulithi?AnswerQ&A
About eleven hours, from a 09:00 takeoff to an arrival around 20:00.
- 2:18:46QuestionWhat difference did the withdrawal of some American carriers make to the operation?AnswerQ&A
A substantial carrier force remained. Sinking all fifteen carriers cited in the response would have delayed American operations, although the delay was judged unlikely to last very long.
- 2:21:15QuestionWhat about the C6N's range from Tokyo with a drop tank?AnswerQ&A
The reconnaissance aircraft for this operation were operating from Truk, not Tokyo.
- 2:29:04Why Operation Tan No. 2 failedChapter
Engine failures and excessive distance undermined the raid, while successive abandoned plans left Tan No. 2 as the attack actually carried out.
- 2:32:56QuestionWhat was the morale effect of the kamikaze hit that put Enterprise out of action?AnswerQ&A
Putting Enterprise out of action had a morale effect, but her survival also strengthened her reputation.
- 2:34:06QuestionWhat replaced cordite in Royal Navy battleships and battlecruisers rebuilt after the First World War?AnswerQ&A
Other, improved grades of cordite rather than a wholly different propellant; SC appeared from 1927 and flashless Cordite NF was used during the Second World War.
- 2:35:50QuestionWould a 9,000-ton convoy-escort cruiser carrying seventy-five four-inch guns and eight torpedo tubes have been useful?AnswerQ&A
Potentially in the First World War or for early anti-aircraft work. For the Second World War, it would be more useful as an anti-aircraft cruiser with larger general-purpose guns around 4.5 to 5 inches.
- 2:38:59QuestionCould the Westland Wyvern have operated from an escort aircraft carrier?AnswerQ&A
Theoretically yes, probably with rocket-assisted takeoff and significant modifications to the aircraft and carrier.
- 2:41:19QuestionWas flashless cordite used in filming The Battle of the River Plate?AnswerQ&A
No. Flashless cordite was thought likely in the real battle, but not in the filming.
- 2:42:43QuestionWas the newer flashless cordite as energetic?AnswerQ&A
A modest reduction in energy per unit could be accepted to avoid revealing a ship at night, with a larger charge compensating where gun dimensions allowed it.
- 2:45:05QuestionHow would Tan No. 2 have fared against Royal Navy armored carriers?AnswerQ&A
Probably little damage, though an impact aft could still have had an effect.
- 2:52:43QuestionWhat nuclear-explosion yield would be equivalent to 112 tons of cordite?AnswerQ&A
No reliable figure is given. The cordite first has to be converted into TNT equivalent, and the calculation needs further research.
- 2:56:20QuestionCould a ship carry thousands of tons of cordite?AnswerQ&A
An offhand estimate suggests low thousands of tons for a battleship when charges for all its guns are included. The figures are recalled from memory, with a correction during the answer.