Q&A · 2:15:23

Why some navies retained mixed secondary batteries

Separate surface and anti-aircraft guns promise peak performance in each role, while a dual-purpose battery accepts compromise.

Question

Why did Soviet, Italian, and German battleships retain mixed secondary batteries while other navies adopted dual-purpose guns?

Short answer

Separate batteries appeared to maximise each role, whereas dual-purpose guns required a compromise those procurement cultures disliked.

Notes

A six-inch surface battery offers more range and penetration than a five-inch gun, while a four-inch weapon can deliver a better anti-aircraft rate of fire. A five-inch dual-purpose system accepts compromises in both roles to simplify the ship's armament. Authoritarian procurement cultures could favour nominal perfection in separate roles over that operational and logistical compromise. Mixed batteries follow from the desire to maximise each individual task rather than the whole system.