Would a rebuilt Tribal-class destroyer be historically exact?

Would a rebuilt Tribal-class destroyer be historically accurate, or use the dual-purpose mount it might otherwise have received?

One reconstruction would be historically exact; a second could explore the counterfactual design with the unavailable dual-purpose mount.

Historical reconstruction and a design counterfactual call for different ships. If only one Tribal could be rebuilt, it would reproduce the historical vessel as accurately as possible. If resources allowed two, the second could show how the class might have appeared had its intended general-purpose dual-purpose mount been available. The comparison makes weapon-mount availability a visible design constraint without rewriting the historical vessel.