Related time notes
- Japan's Mogami Class: The Ultimate Light Frigate Design?5:34A general-purpose successor to familiar escort designsChapter
- Japan's Mogami Class: The Ultimate Light Frigate Design?10:13National choices for guns, torpedoes, and close defenceNotable Point
- South Korea's Chungnam Class Frigates: Aesthetics vs Missile Depth2:16Domestic shipbuilding with internationally sourced systemsNotable Point
- Products of Their Time: VLS vs Gun sighting in ship design0:36Italian gun calibres and the case for layered defenceNotable Point
- Japanese Destroyers of WWII: Quantity is a Quality of it's own, it can also be a Decisive one9:22Shimakaze's armament and wartime defensive additionsNotable Point
- Japanese Destroyers of WWII: Quantity is a Quality of it's own, it can also be a Decisive one16:55Yugumo's second torpedo salvo depended on survivalNotable Point
- Japanese Destroyers of WWII: Quantity is a Quality of it's own, it can also be a Decisive one31:24Gun comparisons against thin-skinned destroyersNotable Point
- Japanese Destroyers of WWII: Quantity is a Quality of it's own, it can also be a Decisive one32:42Smaller escort destroyers and the late search for quantityChapter
- Bruships 264: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:05:30Replacing Tirpitz's secondary battery with 5-inch/54 gunsQ&A
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...14:20Twin naval guns, recoil and wartime firepowerQ&A
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:49:38Oto Melara's 127 mm and 76 mm gunsNotable Point
- USN Destroyers Fletcher to Gearings9:05Fletcher guns, torpedoes, range, and machineryChapter
- USN Destroyers Fletcher to Gearings15:29Single gun mounts and Fletcher crew working spaceNotable Point
- USN Destroyers Fletcher to Gearings27:38Sumner armament and enduranceChapter
- USN Destroyers Fletcher to Gearings29:04More Sumner firepower within nearly the same hull dimensionsNotable Point
- USN Destroyers Fletcher to Gearings33:27A fourth twin mount would change the Sumner's compromisesNotable Point
- USN Destroyers Fletcher to Gearings36:49Robert H. Smith ships adapted the Sumner for minelayingNotable Point
- Air Defence At Sea: From Air Ships in 1906, to drones in 2026 and everything in between...1:00:21Comparing 5-inch/38 and 5.25-inch gun coverageNotable Point
- Air Defence At Sea: From Air Ships in 1906, to drones in 2026 and everything in between...1:03:27Heavy anti-aircraft fire, formation disruption and Force ZNotable Point
- Air Defence At Sea: From Air Ships in 1906, to drones in 2026 and everything in between...1:07:52Catching aircraft orbiting beyond 5-inch gun rangeNotable Point
- Air Defence At Sea: From Air Ships in 1906, to drones in 2026 and everything in between...1:16:12Why automatic 6-inch guns disappointed in air defenceNotable Point
- Air Defence At Sea: From Air Ships in 1906, to drones in 2026 and everything in between...1:58:09Why Royal Navy gun standardisation kept restartingQ&A
- Air Defence At Sea: From Air Ships in 1906, to drones in 2026 and everything in between...2:01:21Revisiting wartime guns and a 5.25-inch Daring alternativeQ&A
- Air Defence At Sea: From Air Ships in 1906, to drones in 2026 and everything in between...2:20:42Missile minimum range preserves a place for 5-inch gunsNotable Point
- What if Britain joined with Australian & Canada to build a 'Maximum' Invincible Class instead?31:34Layered air defence and different gun rangesNotable Point
- 14 Acts and 7 Classes - the story of the USN Interwar Destroyers22:19Farragut paired greater range with British-derived machineryNotable Point
- 14 Acts and 7 Classes - the story of the USN Interwar Destroyers26:55Porter turned the destroyer leader into a scouting weaponChapter
- 14 Acts and 7 Classes - the story of the USN Interwar Destroyers41:35Mahan restored domestic machinery development and Pacific rangeChapter
- 14 Acts and 7 Classes - the story of the USN Interwar Destroyers54:07Gridley traded Pacific range for speed and torpedo powerChapter
- 14 Acts and 7 Classes - the story of the USN Interwar Destroyers1:06:35Bagley paired long range with a mass torpedo attackChapter
- 14 Acts and 7 Classes - the story of the USN Interwar Destroyers1:27:35Somers combined leader firepower with long-range flexibilityChapter
- 14 Acts and 7 Classes - the story of the USN Interwar Destroyers1:27:59Somers concentrated twelve torpedoes in one salvoNotable Point
- 14 Acts and 7 Classes - the story of the USN Interwar Destroyers1:40:16Benham exposed the tradeoff between torpedoes and screening weaponsChapter
- 14 Acts and 7 Classes - the story of the USN Interwar Destroyers2:03:42Benson made machinery layout a form of protectionChapter
- 14 Acts and 7 Classes - the story of the USN Interwar Destroyers2:15:44Gleaves strength shrank sharply when measured as available escortsChapter
- Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:12:23Alaska remains useful with an early-war anti-aircraft batteryQ&A
- America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class16:34Armament suited to a large carrier escortNotable Point
- Guadalcanal, HMS Africa, Spy Ships, Metacentric Height & Cruiser build Ticonderoga: 5 in 1 Live1:12:57Will counter-drone warfare bring back more naval guns?Q&A
- Bruships 254: Naval History Questions Answered Live4:57:07Railguns, Gauss guns, and the barrel-life problemQ&A
- Nazi Destroyers of WWII: Failing to Learn, Failing to Build, Failing to Deliver...12:04Type 1936B: a better destroyer that arrived in too few numbersChapter
- Nazi Destroyers of WWII: Failing to Learn, Failing to Build, Failing to Deliver...16:40Type 1936C showed how late German destroyer recovery had becomeNotable Point
- Nazi Destroyers of WWII: Failing to Learn, Failing to Build, Failing to Deliver...24:32The Type 1942 showed a more useful destroyer directionChapter
- Nazi Destroyers of WWII: Failing to Learn, Failing to Build, Failing to Deliver...46:54The 1945 project finally reflected the destroyer lessonsChapter
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 242:20Would an 18-inch gun make a useful anti-submarine mortar?Q&A
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 246:21The case for another look at 6-inch naval gunsNotable Point
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 21:54:38Why a surviving Repulse would not immediately receive American 5-inch gunsQ&A
- The Perils of Standardisation: Can Navy's Standardise too much? (Patreon Premier)1:39Royal Navy gun standardization created more variationChapter
- The Perils of Standardisation: Can Navy's Standardise too much? (Patreon Premier)38:18How British gun ranges disrupted Japanese air tacticsNotable Point
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:49:08A Vanguard-derived game design and its secondary-gun refitNotable Point
- Durand de la Penne Class: The Destroyer class which showed the Oto Melara 76mm had came of age11:03Impavido brings guided missiles to Italy's destroyersChapter
- Durand de la Penne Class: The Destroyer class which showed the Oto Melara 76mm had came of age13:53Audace gains room for modernizationChapter
- Could the US Navy have kept the Oliver Hazard Perry's in service for longer?1:27:27Could an evolved Perry carry a 5-inch gun?Q&A
- Modularity Squared... What happens if the Stanflex & Meko combined into a single program?30:28Fixed VLS and swappable modules can divide core and optional weaponsChapter
- Modularity Squared... What happens if the Stanflex & Meko combined into a single program?37:45The MEKO A400 could combine Aegis, fixed VLS, and modular payloadsChapter
- Bruships 244: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:36:32Yamato dual-purpose secondary battery tradeoffQ&A
- Bruships 244: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:49:19Kingfisher gun-launched munitions against undersea dronesQ&A
- Bruships 242: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:26:01How larger main guns could make room for 3-inch weaponsNotable Point
- Bruships 242: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:02:14A more conventional Zumwalt with mixed VLS batteriesQ&A
- Destroyers: Modern Navy's most powerful surface combatants - 134yrs of development59:39Guns and VLS should be complementary magazinesNotable Point
- Destroyers: Modern Navy's most powerful surface combatants - 134yrs of development1:01:20Cold War destroyers must fight and look convincingNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)24:21Type 83's gun battery remains an open design choiceNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)1:36:17Gun-fired underwater defence and an active anti-torpedo layerNotable Point
- How the USN learnt the lessons to conceive the Arleigh Burke class... From the Gearings to the Kidds0:00Gearing destroyers as the Cold War baselineChapter
- How the USN learnt the lessons to conceive the Arleigh Burke class... From the Gearings to the Kidds10:36Norfolk and Mitscher test status against capabilityChapter
- How the USN learnt the lessons to conceive the Arleigh Burke class... From the Gearings to the Kidds42:57The 5-inch gun's automation and perceived diplomatic effectNotable Point
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:52:08An ice-rated Canadian large surface combatantQ&A
- Hitler's Destroyers: How Type 1934 & Type 1936 Classes, including their variations were developed...1:00:00Narvik and rushed destroyer developmentChapter
- Bruships 235: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:30:10Why historical gun names cannot always be reduced to millimetresNotable Point
- What if the Royal Navy's Aircraft Carrier HMS Hermes had sisters in the 1920s? (Patreon Live)2:06:13Which heavy anti-aircraft gun suits a carrier?Q&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:59:13Why the Royal Navy accumulated so many gun calibresQ&A
- The rise and fall of Constellation class Frigate program? (Patreon Live)3:54:15Could shorter class runs reduce US procurement risk?Q&A
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3rd Start44:08A modern destroyer's guns and radios in earlier naval battlesQ&A
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...32:28A family design for a heavily armed Type 45Notable Point
- Scuttlebutt 18: Guns & Points of Order1:49Why the Royal Navy fielded so many gun calibresQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 17: Missiles, Guns & Other Barrels of Fun16:19What gun calibre suits a modern capital ship?Q&A
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)2:43:14Off-the-shelf guns constrain a large combatantQ&A
- Trumps Battleship; A Naval History view on what we know of the Defiant Class so far20:38Why pairs of defensive systems leave dangerous arcsChapter
- Trumps Battleship; A Naval History view on what we know of the Defiant Class so far30:03Twin 5-inch guns and the missing aviation pictureChapter
- Trumps Battleship; A Naval History view on what we know of the Defiant Class so far44:01Why visible guns matter in a diplomatic visitNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 15: Frigates14:45Why Burke production keeps defeating its replacementNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 15: Frigates21:32Why army gun production does not translate directly to frigatesQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 15: Frigates25:10Choosing between 76 mm, 5-inch and 6-inch gunsNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust1:12:26The logistics benefit of standardizing on five-inch ammunitionQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II1:54:12Why the US 5-inch/38 succeeded as a complete systemNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II1:58:40Surface power versus anti-aircraft rate in secondary batteriesNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II2:15:15Why a 137 mm US destroyer gun was not worth the costQ&A
- Bruships 219: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:25:33The Royal Navy's slow move to the 5-inch/62 gunQ&A
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...After Power Cut2:09:12The Royal Navy receives hundreds of Gearing-class destroyers in 1940Q&A
- #2Historians Live: With @Drachinifel comes to chat & build UAD Dreadnoughts that Almost were P33:35:59A conservative Constitution built from mature weaponsNotable Point
- Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:14:29An Omaha refit for Norwegian coastal defenceNotable Point
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why1:06:28Why the 5-inch/38 succeeded as a complete systemChapter
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why1:07:49Why the 5-inch/38 needed a new barrel designNotable Point
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why1:15:23Germany's 127 mm gun and the deployment gapChapter
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why1:20:26Japan's 127 mm guns and attrition doctrineChapter
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why1:24:24Why elevation alone did not make Japan's 127 mm gun effectiveNotable Point
- Bruships 209: Science Fiction Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:02:53How the Bureau of Ordnance could have sabotaged the US war effortQ&A
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?3:25Royal Navy gun diversity reflected changing prioritiesNotable Point
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?28:38A ubiquitous British dual-purpose gunNotable Point
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:21:32Why higher gun volume matters when ships and missiles are scarceNotable Point
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:27:40Independent targeting versus twin-turret redundancyQ&A
- Bruships 201: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:31:07One layered defense against drones and missilesQ&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:43:46Modern and World War II five-inch naval guns comparedQ&A
- Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?35:18Why the Atlanta duplicated destroyer capabilityChapter
- Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?38:44Why the U.S. Navy stopped at eight AtlantasNotable Point
- Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?43:14Universal guns traded experimentation for logisticsNotable Point
- Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?45:19More directors would leave Atlanta with the same main gunNotable Point
- Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?46:24CL-154 pushed the screening cruiser much furtherNotable Point
- Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?1:22:32Guadalcanal exposed Atlanta's role mismatchChapter
- Didos, Atlantas & Conversions: Which were the true Screening, Scouting or AA Cruisers of WWII?1:28:52Atlanta and Juneau first broke the air attackNotable Point
- Bruships 193: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:09:25HMS Delhi's American 5-inch/38 conversionNotable Point
- Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?3:14:06Would the 5-inch/54 have prolonged Atlanta production?Q&A
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:45:04What an early 5-inch/54 gun would change in the wartime US NavyQ&A
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:50:46There is no single best modern naval gunQ&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued18:57Why two British 5-inch gun projects were not direct successorsQ&A
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!44:08Daring versus Forrest Sherman as postwar gun destroyersQ&A
- So you want to Build a Battleship today? For the 21st Century? Naval History Live2:01:14A large hull can solve vertical-launch reloading at seaChapter
- Bruships 187: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:06:46Why the Royal Navy moved toward a five-inch gunQ&A
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:55:34Why the Royal Navy adopted the 5-inch/62 gunQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:52:55Why a naval gun should retain cheap unguided ammunitionNotable Point
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:28:28The 5-inch gun was the practical destroyer ceilingQ&A
- Bruships 179: Future Projects & Naval History Questions...2:39:05Would a 5-inch gun refit make sense for the Type 45?Q&A
- Bruships 178: Naval History or Exercise4:26:26Could Hedgehog-style ASW weapons return?Q&A
- Battle of the Barents Sea: Naval History Live1:59:24Why heavier German destroyer guns reduced practical firepowerNotable Point
- A Hearts of Iron Christmas... For Shipshape & Christmas, it's HOI4 with @GariusTheBrit28:49Enterprise's British gun mounts and a possible American refitNotable Point
- A Hearts of Iron Christmas... For Shipshape & Christmas, it's HOI4 with @GariusTheBrit47:41Was HMS Enterprise considered for HMS Victorious's American voyage?Q&A
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/48:27:38Why the Albany-class missile cruisers retained gunsNotable Point
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/41:16:59Why HMS Vanguard was unlikely to receive US 5-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax1:44:24Why a British 130 mm gun would probably stay 130 mmQ&A
- Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax2:41:46Why a 5.1-inch gun would barely change wartime destroyer conversionsQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!3:41:29Why a 6.1-inch gun adoption could displace the 5-inch/62Q&A
- Bruships 167: Tell me why, everything turned book – packing up, stacking up is all kalax want to do.2:45:43Could twin five-inch naval mounts return?Q&A
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....3:06:13Why six twin 5-inch mounts do not fit a destroyerQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!3:43:26Why a Gearing could not simply take the 5-inch/54Q&A
- Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat2:14:53How transferable were sailors between naval gun crews?Q&A
- Finding Forrestal Class... The First Supercarriers...12:50Forrestal marks a Dreadnought-like carrier breakChapter
- Check Campaign 17: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:47:17A 3,000-ton ASW destroyer runs out of weightNotable Point
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion24:24Lexington's eight-inch guns and the case for escortsNotable Point
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books4:04:53Future cruiser guns and an unresolved railgun calibreQ&A
- Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō31:12A more viable forward aviation shipNotable Point
- Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō36:37Ryūjō's treaty-driven design and stability problemsChapter
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:01:32The minimum gun for naval shore bombardmentQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:06:02British choices for a larger destroyer gunQ&A
- Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:48:31Cold War cruisers favored 5-inch dual-purpose guns over automatic 8-inch weaponsQ&A
- Patreon 92: Frank Whittle is given consistent funding by Britain to develop jet engines from 19281:33:52Six parallel gun calibres expose a procurement problemNotable Point
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: There was a game update2:09:27A light battleship replaces an impractical armored cruiserChapter
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare39:52Displacement for an eight-gun Tribal-style destroyerQ&A
- Scylla & Charybdis: 4.5in gun Didos - Key Ships Reserve Series, Ship 124:49What a successful dual-purpose mount might have changedNotable Point
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 72:11:37Gun calibre should change turret scaleNotable Point
- Bruships: Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:27:27Using naval guns to disrupt submarines in littoral waterNotable Point
- Patreon 83: What were the most serious mistakes made in WWII based on WWI experience?2:53:02What was wrong with the La Galissonnière class?Q&A
- H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 419:10Why split secondary batteries consume a shipNotable Point
- Testing Sixteen Autoloaded 14in Gun Battleship (Chatfield's Dream) to Destruction1:49:01Why better small guns do not end the calibre raceQ&A
- Lexington & Saratoga Carrier Conception: Key Ship Series 3, Ships 10 &1117:33Speed and turboelectric propulsionNotable Point
- Lexington & Saratoga Carrier Conception: Key Ship Series 3, Ships 10 &1133:20A six-ship Lexington counterfactualNotable Point
- Albany Class: Comment Response23:11Where Albany carried her guns and torpedo tubesNotable Point
- Meeting HMAS Vampire!1:39The Daring class as a Tribal successorNotable Point
- USS Long Beach: Comment Response12:12Why Long Beach retained 5-inch/38 gunsQ&A
- Some Books Aquired So Far in #NavHistAus23! Brisbane44:43Why U.S. destroyers did not immediately adopt twin five-inch mountsQ&A
- US Treaty Cruisers in War & Retrospect: Comment Response13:51Why Lexington's 8-inch guns were a poor carrier compromiseQ&A
- A 13.5in gun Dreadnought? Would it work?1:40:04Yamato's protection and secondary batteryNotable Point
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done1:58:04Atlanta-style cruisers and saturation fireNotable Point
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done2:24:51Building the Alaska class around speed and twelve-inch gunsChapter
- Bruships 111: Random Books of History3:14:18Replacing torpedo mounts with more destroyer gunsQ&A
- Starting with Building HMS Thunderchild...2:51:19Recognising national destroyer design in a simulationNotable Point
- USS Wichita: Comment Response25:27Wichita hull anti-air and missile ideasNotable Point
- USS Wichita: Comment Response35:06Wichita's 5-inch battery and a 15,000-ton counterfactualNotable Point
- Christmas Comment Response: HMCS Sackville, Descartes & some 60s shorts1:08:43Wichita's hybrid lineage and a 5-inch anti-aircraft cruiserNotable Point
- Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-651:13:10Japanese gun standardization could only narrow the gapQ&A
- US Treaty Cruiser in War & Retrospect30:42Atlanta, Dido, and layered air defenceChapter
- US Treaty Cruiser in War & Retrospect34:25Cleveland as a general-purpose wartime cruiserNotable Point
- USS Long Beach(CGN-9): The USN's Last Cruiser...14:34Five-inch guns as a hedge in a missile-age cruiserChapter
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat3:06:06How layered fleet defenses broke up kamikaze attacksQ&A
- USS Wichita(CA-45); The Greatest Treaty 8in Cruiser9:04Why Wichita mixed open and enclosed five-inch mountsNotable Point
- USS Wichita(CA-45); The Greatest Treaty 8in Cruiser11:08How Wichita's armor changed an eight-inch fightNotable Point
- USS Wichita(CA-45); The Greatest Treaty 8in Cruiser17:24Wartime AA growth and uncertain fitting datesNotable Point
- USS Wichita(CA-45); The Greatest Treaty 8in Cruiser22:58The star secondary layout used by wartime US cruisersNotable Point
- Patreon 68: What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?1:23:06Could the 4.7-inch approach the US 5-inch/38?Q&A
- Patreon 68: What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?2:29:12Why not adopt the US Navy 5-inch/38?Q&A
- Sverdlov Class: Comment Response58:58Why calibre alone cannot explain modern naval-gun performanceNotable Point
- Brooklyn Class(US Treaty Cruisers): Comment Response12:56How World War II layered air defense was meant to workNotable Point
- Brooklyn Class(US Treaty Cruisers): Comment Response37:14Using radar-controlled rapid fire to break torpedo attacksNotable Point
- Bruships 87: Books Found on My Travels, New Books & Christmas Recomendations2:27:22A 1930s American rebuild of Argentina's battleshipsQ&A
- Brooklyn Class: The Not Quite Last US Treaty Era Cruisers6:58Turret arcs and secondary guns shape the cruiserNotable Point
- Brooklyn Class: The Not Quite Last US Treaty Era Cruisers35:00Savannah's changing fittings demand date-aware identificationNotable Point
- Brooklyn Class: The Not Quite Last US Treaty Era Cruisers1:07:35St. Louis shows the mature Brooklyn designChapter
- 19th Century Cruisers: Comment Response Video 2 (Velasco - Imperieuse)49:21A protected-deck alternative for ImperieuseNotable Point
- New Orleans Class: US Treaty Era Cruisers21:55The five-inch/25 as the interwar heavy anti-aircraft gunNotable Point
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today2:43:43Why five-inch guns better matched the Atlanta-class missionQ&A
- Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions39:54Why the US Navy stayed with the five-inch gunQ&A
- Modern Frigates: Cruisers by any other name? (Patreon 57 Long Patrol)1:11:54The F125 mismatch between size and air defenseNotable Point
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?55:52FREMM national variants and cruiser workChapter
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?1:05:06Constellation's gun and presence problemChapter
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?1:57:48F125 and the peacetime-frigate trapChapter
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?2:07:35One Aegis family called frigate and destroyerChapter
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?2:36:51De Zeven Provinciën as a balanced air-defence shipChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)12:56North Carolina shows what 35,000 tons could deliverNotable Point
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)1:03:12UAD British and German treaty battleship designsChapter
- County Cruisers P7: The Canaris Class (Long Patrol)39:24Why destroyer guns threatened the two-inch beltNotable Point
- 1939 Destroyer Doctrine: Patreon 50 (Long Patrol)1:12:58Fletcher-class numbers turn doctrine into capabilityChapter
- Patreon 50: 1939 Destroyer Doctrine of the combatant navies & Where did it come from?47:21Why German destroyer guns were weak dual-purpose weaponsQ&A
- Battle Cruiser Squadron Action: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)20:41The five-inch compromise and the six-inch roleNotable Point
- Cutting through some Cutters of the US Coast Guard (Long Patrol)19:19Lake-class cutters as wartime escortsChapter
- Quirky Classes and What they tell us about their navies… (Live)45:51Why smaller dual-purpose guns suited carriers betterQ&A
- Bruships 60: Covid Jab, Bad Back & New Books51:07What happens when missiles run shortQ&A
- Patreon 33: Amphibious ship development from 1980's to modern day.1:01:54Tarawa's 5-inch guns added amphibious fire supportQ&A
- Patreon 33: Amphibious ship development from 1980's to modern day.3:50:41Rate of fire matters in a Tribal-Fletcher gun comparisonQ&A
- Patreon 33: Amphibious ship development from 1980's to modern day.3:52:23Type 26 moves the Royal Navy to a supported 5-inch gunQ&A
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 3/11 Pre-Dreadnought Cruisers6:07USS Chester and the scout-to-light-cruiser transitionChapter
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (4)4:14:46The 5-inch/38 and British 4.5-inch gunQ&A
- Bruships 46: Accounts of Naval War1:02:50Why six inches approached the manual-handling limitNotable Point
- Bruships 42: Some More Scifi2:17:54Why choose a 57 mm gun instead of a 76 mm gun?Q&A
- Bruships 40: Favourite Books to Use When Writing...20:36Why a five-inch gun is not five inches longNotable Point
- Four Random Books 22: Warships Illustrated3:32D-class cruiser armament and wartime refitsChapter
- RN Paper Cruisers; the what might have beens…1:21:20The changing comparison between British 5.25-inch and American 5-inch gunsQ&A
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 2 of 5/Articles 8-106:03Treaty pressure and the super-destroyer raceChapter
- Battle of Trafalgar & it's Legacy2:32:08Why Tribals paired heavy guns with quadruple torpedoesQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 14: Special & Covert Operations Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:45:42Why a twin 5-inch mount would be expensive for BritainQ&A
- An Introduction to the "D" Class Cruisers Part 2 of 212:03The unrealised anti-aircraft cruiser refitChapter
- An Introduction to the "D" Class Cruisers Part 2 of 224:15Delhi's conversion and Despatch at MulberryNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 4: Naval Aviation Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A3:37:39Best naval gun depends on the metricQ&A
- A Name to illustrate a navy - HMS Leander through history1:22:15Why Type 26 moves to a five-inch gunQ&A