Q&A · 44:43-45:41

Why U.S. destroyers did not immediately adopt twin five-inch mounts

The delay in adopting twin destroyer mounts reflects torpedo armament, ammunition supply, and sustained-rate-of-fire calculations rather than simple institutional stubbornness.

Question

Why did the U.S. Navy adopt twin five-inch destroyer mounts later than other navies?

Short answer

Because it was balancing gun power against torpedoes, ammunition capacity, and sustained rate of fire, not choosing mounts in isolation.

Notes

The U.S. Navy's choice balanced guns, torpedoes, and ammunition. A twin five-inch mount changes the balance with torpedo armament and demands more ammunition than a single mount. Its theoretical rate of fire must also be tested against the sustained rate that the crew and supply system can maintain. Copying a foreign mounting arrangement was therefore no simple one-for-one improvement in destroyer design.