Related time notes
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live42:29An enlarged Daring with another twin 4.5-inch mountQ&A
- Destroyer Leaders: Where did they come from and why?48:28Ordinary destroyers absorb the leader's workNotable Point
- Air Defence At Sea: From Air Ships in 1906, to drones in 2026 and everything in between...2:01:21Revisiting wartime guns and a 5.25-inch Daring alternativeQ&A
- Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:23:53What would get the Minotaur, Neptune and Tiger cruisers built?Q&A
- Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...57:38Which pre-1950 ships could still serve with a light refit?Q&A
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...49:18Swapping later ships into an earlier namesake classQ&A
- Bruships 253: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:26:24HMAS Tattoo and Australia's flexible ship-naming traditionsQ&A
- Nazi Destroyers of WWII: Failing to Learn, Failing to Build, Failing to Deliver...46:54The 1945 project finally reflected the destroyer lessonsChapter
- Claiming Mare Nostrum; Italian Destroyer Design & Procurment of the 1920s & 30s1:01:07Destroyer gun houses and weather protectionNotable Point
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:48:18Iroquois-class equivalents and the value of a larger fleetQ&A
- Ideal Destroyers: Screening Fleets & National Interests from 1890 to Today48:54Postwar destroyers combine dual-purpose guns and ASW weaponsNotable Point
- Ideal Destroyers: Screening Fleets & National Interests from 1890 to Today52:27Daring-class presence makes deterrence visibleNotable Point
- Durand de la Penne Class: The Destroyer class which showed the Oto Melara 76mm had came of age11:03Impavido brings guided missiles to Italy's destroyersChapter
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...13:43Daring class destroyers set a high postwar benchmarkChapter
- Destroyers: Modern Navy's most powerful surface combatants - 134yrs of development52:21Haida and Vampire show destroyers becoming cruisersNotable Point
- Destroyers: Modern Navy's most powerful surface combatants - 134yrs of development56:52Daring-class destroyers become cruiser substitutesNotable Point
- HMS Walker(D27); a destroyer of two World Wars(Live)27:24Daring and Charles F. Adams among standout postwar destroyersQ&A
- If WWII is delayed, what do the Warships of the 1950s look like?49:13Destroyers divide into leaders, fleet ships, and escortsChapter
- Modern Chinese Destroyers: How the Current People's Liberation Army Navy's surface ships came to be1:26:05Type 052D cell depths may vary between batchesNotable Point
- The Reality of Soviet Naval Presence in the Cold War: Destroyers are the Fleet0:00Why Cold War memory misses destroyersNotable Point
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 202658:58Which class bridges the 1944 G class and the Daring class?Q&A
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 20261:22:38Battle and Daring classes broadened the destroyer's weapons fitNotable Point
- 134yrs of evolution: How a Destroyer's Role has evolved from as envisaged in 1892 to 20262:25:58Which Cold War destroyer had the best modernization potential?Q&A
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:32:52A late-1960s ASW conversion for the Daring classQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War8:54:37Why British wartime destroyers aged differentlyQ&A
- Unryū class: Japan's Light Fleet Carriers!7:20A common design with major machinery differencesChapter
- Bruships 215 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:23:15Preserved destroyers as naval-history destinationsQ&A
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age4:43Daring class as the peak Royal Navy gun destroyerChapter
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age16:37Why the Darings did not receive Sea Slug conversionsNotable Point
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age19:25Daring-class pairs tested competing electrical systemsNotable Point
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age1:05:06Daring and County armament exposes Type 82's redundancy gapNotable Point
- Izumo Class; Building for the future or planned preperation?28:10From Daring to County - and why Type 42 breaks the lineNotable Point
- Why do Historians never seem to run out of projects?0:48How a destroyer question became a Royal Navy studyNotable Point
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...After Power Cut1:13:54The Daring class as the Royal Navy’s dream destroyerQ&A
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...20:19A heavily armed Black Swan escortQ&A
- Maya Class: The Ultimate Arleigh Burke Flight IIA or something else?34:44How radar requirements give Maya a flagship silhouetteNotable Point
- Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:53:27A hypothetical 1950 navy built from surplus shipsQ&A
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?1:08:06Daring's 30-knot rating included war loads and months out of dockNotable Point
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:14:09A solvent Britain reshapes its fleet after 1945Q&A
- Bruships 201: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:18:24What would follow the Gearing class in a longer World War II?Q&A
- Bruships 198: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:46:31Britain was approaching an autoloading 4.5-inch mount before the warQ&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:41:52If the Scrap Iron Flotilla received Daring-class destroyersQ&A
- Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?58:23Scylla and Charybdis tested the 4.5-inch upper-deck mountingNotable Point
- Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?1:04:33Why did the 4.5-inch UD mount disappoint?Q&A
- Bruships 191: Naval History Questions Answered Live...7:38How the Royal Navy settled on AC electrical powerQ&A
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:58:25What HMAS Vampire's machinery spaces revealNotable Point
- Dalrymple Hamilton: The Captain of HMS Rodney who believed she could be a destroyer2:05:32Destroyer growth and a command-culture legacyChapter
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!44:08Daring versus Forrest Sherman as postwar gun destroyersQ&A
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!46:26Daring's ancestry in a larger prewar L-class designNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!3:47:12Designing a gun-based modern air-defense destroyerQ&A
- The Life of Admiral Sir Frederick Hew George Dalrymple-Hamilton: When Speed is never enough!3:18:43Which postwar ship would Dalrymple-Hamilton have chosen?Q&A
- What if HMS Indomitable replaced Prince of Wales in Force Z?2:25:20Would an earlier victory prevent the Daring-class destroyers?Q&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:20:10A fully funded postwar Royal NavyQ&A
- Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...Part II1:38:52Why new Second World War Darings would not fit a modern fleetQ&A
- Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...3:19:07What makes an ideal warship design?Q&A
- Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 20242:40:51A book on the Tribal, Battle, and Daring-class destroyersQ&A
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/42:37:10How the L70 destroyer proposal led toward the Daring classQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/426:37Redesigning the Dido class and its link to the Tribal destroyersQ&A
- Ramblings Emergency Broadcast1:00:05The L70 destroyer and early radar integrationNotable Point
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 11:08:19Use light carriers to perfect the jet-age fleetChapter
- Bruships 169: Kalax o Kalax, my kingdom for a Kalax...29:42Which Cold War warships most deserve preservation?Q&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song1:23:52Why 1950s Darings suit a 1950s Soviet-war scenarioQ&A
- Japan's I-400 Class: Waste of Resources, Idea to Soon or Idea to late?10:54The surviving Tribal and Daring destroyersNotable Point
- HMAS Melbourne and HMCS Bonaventure21:29Melbourne and her Daring-class escort forceNotable Point
- What do the fleets look like if they achieve full pre-WWII Modernisation? Patreon Premier1:18:16Britain's two-tier destroyers and global escort networkChapter
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!25:27The Royal Navy's transition from DC to ACQ&A
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends2:47:59Why the Royal Navy split its dual-purpose gun effortQ&A
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built43:24Why the Royal Navy's change from hammocks was not a clean breakQ&A
- 824 Sqn Royal Naval Air Service: Spectat Ubique Spiritus (The Wind Everywhere Looks On)5:13Tribal, Battle, and Daring classes foreshadowed the general-purpose destroyerNotable Point
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered1:51:23Why Tribal-class destroyers handled heavy weather betterQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered29:22How British destroyers might grow without treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered3:17:45How a larger Daring class enlarges later destroyersQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!3:24:08What a 2,000-ton treaty destroyer could carryQ&A
- What Happens If Whittle is supported & Britain develops Jet Engines + Gas Turbines in 1930s1:08:29Electric drive still requires a weight and current-system choiceNotable Point
- Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:58:42Daring-class plans would give 1934 Britain technology it could actually buildQ&A
- Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:18:13Malta and gas-turbine plans complement the Daring blueprintQ&A
- HMS Diamond(1950) D35: Presence without Conviction is no Detterence - Key Ship Series 7 Ship 816:28Sixteen Darings planned, eight builtChapter
- HMS Diamond(1950) D35: Presence without Conviction is no Detterence - Key Ship Series 7 Ship 822:13Daring-class machinery, range, and radar suiteChapter
- HMS Diamond(1950) D35: Presence without Conviction is no Detterence - Key Ship Series 7 Ship 824:16The Daring class's 4.5-inch dual-purpose batteryChapter
- HMS Diamond(1950) D35: Presence without Conviction is no Detterence - Key Ship Series 7 Ship 827:33A layered anti-air, anti-surface, and ASW armamentNotable Point
- HMS Diamond(1950) D35: Presence without Conviction is no Detterence - Key Ship Series 7 Ship 830:58The shipyard depth behind the Daring programNotable Point
- HMS Diamond(1950) D35: Presence without Conviction is no Detterence - Key Ship Series 7 Ship 840:30Why a medium power needs flexible warshipsNotable Point
- HMS Diamond(1950) D35: Presence without Conviction is no Detterence - Key Ship Series 7 Ship 844:20Big destroyers preserved a cruiser-like imageNotable Point
- Blackburn Blackburn: The Ugliest Eyes of the Fleet Ever Seen - Key Aircraft Series 1 Aircraft 14:42The Tribal-to-Daring line shows how naval requirements evolveNotable Point
- HMS Nubian: Most Battle Honours of the Tribal Class - KSS3 S5 Comment Response4:11Why the Tribal, Battle, and Daring classes need a shared historyChapter
- HMS Cossack: A Dangerous Destroyer to Behold - KSS3 S1 Comment Response5:16Why Tribal-class destroyers suffered turbine blade rubbingQ&A
- Tillman Class: Dreams of Super Battleships - KSS2 S8 Comment Response37:32Super-battleships pull destroyers toward Daring sizeNotable Point
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare23:24A four-twin-turret rule reshapes the Royal NavyQ&A
- Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series2:43:12Post-war ship classes would overwhelm the Axis navies in 1941Q&A
- Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics1:52:22Why the first postwar warships were still gun-armedQ&A
- Malta Class: Once more the Royal Navy building for the After War? - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 25:45Destroyers as the carrier's protective screenNotable Point
- Alsace class: France Building Back - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 97:44The destroyer design Britain wanted but could not yet buildNotable Point
- Number 13 Class: Dreams of Yamatos - Key Ship Series 4, Ship 66:02More Daring-class destroyers and postwar naval presenceNotable Point
- Some Books Aquired So Far in #NavHistAus23! Sydney58:02How HMAS Vampire's badge acquired a meaningless Latin mottoChapter
- Some Books Aquired So Far in #NavHistAus23! Sydney1:10:28What made the Daring class a capable destroyerQ&A
- Meeting HMAS Vampire!1:39The Daring class as a Tribal successorNotable Point
- Meeting HMAS Vampire!3:53Why Vampire traded torpedoes for radarNotable Point
- Meeting HMAS Vampire!4:33Why the Daring silhouette reads as a warshipNotable Point
- Some Books Aquired So Far in #NavHistAus23! Brisbane7:02HMAS Voyager and the limits of a hurried inquiryNotable Point
- HMS Cossack: Key Ships Series 3, Ship 1...special edition...7:24Destroyer evolution from Tribals to DaringNotable Point
- Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...3:19:15What would an autoloading 5.25-inch super-destroyer resemble?Q&A
- Ship-Shape Special: Alex & Garius Command a Carrier... How bad can this be?32:40HMAS Vampire as the surviving Daring-class comparisonQ&A
- Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-651:01:51Treaty weight constrained enclosed Tribal-class mountsQ&A
- Top 5 Inventions that came too Late14:25Dual-purpose guns before Norway and the MediterraneanChapter
- Soviet Navy 1918-19913:01:47Western ships set the pace for Soviet naval catch-up in the 1950sChapter
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat3:03:18Daring-class destroyers as Falklands command and gun shipsQ&A
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat4:04:29An invasion of Japan would redirect Royal Navy productionQ&A
- Calypso (1883) Class0:10From Daring-class experiments to Calypso's finalized pairNotable Point
- Patreon 68: What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?1:20:09Why the 4.5-inch upper-deck mount kept slippingQ&A
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat40:43A 1954 program for better Royal Navy air defenseQ&A
- Sverdlov Class: Comment Response41:51How NATO planned to counter Sverdlov cruisersQ&A
- Sverdlov Class: Comment Response44:32Why two Darings were a doubtful answer to a SverdlovNotable Point
- Sverdlov Class: Comment Response49:26Why a Daring could fill a cruiser station without matching its firepowerNotable Point
- Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times2:39:34HMAS Vampire as evidence for Daring-class machineryQ&A
- Ruse de guerre26:57Could a 4.5-inch mount have improved Abdiel?Notable Point
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today3:14:58How Daring-class destroyers might fare in a Guadalcanal night fightQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:15:18How treaty-free Tribal-class destroyers might growQ&A
- A Treaty Inspired Destroyer Design Discussion: UAD & Patreon Infused video41:51Without treaties, a two-tier destroyer fleet emergesChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)53:42Commonwealth destroyers and peacetime influenceNotable Point
- 2022 Canada Naval History Trip Reading List (Long Patrol Book Review)4:50From Tribal, Battle, and Daring classes to the modern destroyerNotable Point
- Galaxy Class: Federation 24th Century1:12:57A layered fleet needs both Galaxy and Defiant typesChapter
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...50:06Why the 4.5-inch gun won the postwar lineageQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)28:39Commonwealth demand for Battle-class destroyersQ&A
- 1939 Destroyer Doctrine: Patreon 50 (Long Patrol)1:02:33A wartime 4.5-inch mount and the doctrine built around itNotable Point
- Patreon 48: Anglo-Japanese War in Feb 39 - if Tsingtao Incident goes "hot", what's IJN doctrine?3:03:25Would the Battle and Daring classes arrive earlier?Q&A
- Bruships 73: Some Old, Some New, None Borrowed, but Some Blue33:58What an early Battle-class destroyer programme could have deliveredQ&A
- HMS Tiger - The Battle Cruiser Hunter 2, The UAD Version: A UAD infused Discussion (Long Patrol)53:47Class history reveals a navy's fleet conceptsNotable Point
- HMS Tiger - The Battle Cruiser Hunter: A UAD infused discussion58:10How destroyers grew into a cruiser roleNotable Point
- Patreon 43: "Unverified stories of Norwegian Campaign: Tall Tales of Tribals"1:09:03The L70 'super-Tribal' as an early DaringQ&A
- Patreon 43: "Unverified stories of Norwegian Campaign: Tall Tales of Tribals"2:46:24The 4.5-inch upper-deck mount the Tribals arrived too early to receiveQ&A
- Patreon 43: "Unverified stories of Norwegian Campaign: Tall Tales of Tribals"3:09:50How HMS Diana might have protected a larger Daring-class orderQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (10)1:47:46Rebuilding the wartime Royal Navy around mature designsQ&A
- Bruships 65: Naval History Books & Questions Answered24:38Warship games as gateways to naval historyQ&A
- Bruships 65: Naval History Books & Questions Answered56:44How the Daring gun would have appeared on the Malta classQ&A
- Patreon 41: RN Strategic & Tactical thinking on submarines & anti-submarine forces between the Wars2:09:20How the treaty limit constrained the Tribal-class destroyersQ&A
- Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...2:42:05Tribals, Battles and Darings on destroyer design and diplomacyChapter
- Tribals, Battles & Darings/British Trawlers & Drifters in 2 World Wars: A Book or Two To Review (36)19:24Why a historian can publish without claiming research is finishedNotable Point
- Tribals, Battles & Darings/British Trawlers & Drifters in 2 World Wars: A Book or Two To Review (36)35:55Three destroyer generations are also three generations of crewsNotable Point
- Tribals, Battles & Darings/British Trawlers & Drifters in 2 World Wars: A Book or Two To Review (36)37:30The gun-to-missile transition was not a simple replacementNotable Point
- Tribals, Battles & Darings/British Trawlers & Drifters in 2 World Wars: A Book or Two To Review (36)38:23From Tribals to Counties: destroyers taking on cruiser functionsNotable Point
- Tribals, Battles & Darings has just arrived4:26From Tribal combat losses to the Battle and Daring classesChapter
- Tribals, Battles & Darings has just arrived5:04Photographs, design tables, and the HMS Lagos builder's guideNotable Point
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 10/11 Why the Battleship Fizzled Out7:09Unnecessary is not the same as obsoleteChapter
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 10/11 Why the Battleship Fizzled Out14:44The destroyer as a versatile postwar combatantNotable Point
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 1/11 Archer Class8:12Jeune École, flotilla defence, and larger successorsChapter
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (4)4:36:16Why Britain did not send a battleship to KoreaQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (4)4:56:16The L73 'super Tribal' and the postwar Daring classQ&A
- Bruships 55: New Books53:24Choosing the scope of a history of Tribal, Battle, and Daring destroyersQ&A
- Bruships 43: Aircraft Carriers & Naval Aviation4:08:00The Daring class as an electrical and machinery experimentNotable Point
- Crown Colony Class Long Patrol: Part 4 Ceylon to Newfoundland44:13Newfoundland's battle with the Egyptian frigate DomiatChapter
- Bruships 40: Favourite Books to Use When Writing...1:26:57Crew recollections add lived experience to ship chronologiesNotable Point
- Bruships 40: Favourite Books to Use When Writing...1:29:05HMS Decoy combined diplomatic visits with Bahamas patrolsNotable Point
- Bruships 40: Favourite Books to Use When Writing...1:36:31How an alphabetical destroyer scheme produced Daring, Delight, and DaintyNotable Point
- For Random Books 18: Freidman's Royal Navy2:17Why a postwar multi-role destroyer became too largeNotable Point
- Amphion Class Cruisers: Long Patrol1:42:31Amphion names in the modern Australian fleetNotable Point
- What if the 1956 Suez Crisis had gotten even hotter? (Long Patrol)27:49The scale of the Anglo-French task forceNotable Point
- What if the 1956 Suez Crisis had gotten even hotter? (Long Patrol)49:55The Royal Navy's global security role before SuezNotable Point
- Battle of Trafalgar & it's Legacy2:42:37HMS Jervis in British destroyer designQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 13: Weapons, Both Personal & Ship, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:54:03What the Daring-class AC and DC trials achievedQ&A
- 50th Live Special: Thank You57:35D-class variation multiplied the support burdenNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 3: Daring Class0:06The Daring class as a postwar back-pocket cruiserChapter
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 3: Daring Class2:00Destroyer growth from First World War scale to DaringNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 3: Daring Class4:56What a Daring could do in a Jutland-era fleetNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 3: Daring Class6:20Why eight Darings contained four machinery combinationsNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 3: Daring Class10:20Specialist machinery and Admiral Fraser's backingNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 3: Daring Class11:49Mk VI guns, anti-aircraft weapons, and SquidNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 3: Daring Class13:27Rejected changes to gun arcs and deck heightNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 3: Daring Class15:54Bridge geometry and the Mk VI gun mountNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 3: Daring Class18:04Seaslug, radar, and the Falklands counterfactualNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 3: Daring Class20:35Alternating machinery spaces for damage resistanceNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 3: Daring Class21:46Torpedoes and the last back-pocket cruisersChapter
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 3: Daring Class24:24Why a presence ship needs room to host peopleNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 3: Daring Class27:00Why Daring outlasted the Battle-class conceptNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 3: Daring Class30:44A speculative lineage from Henderson to DaringNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 3: Daring Class32:45The Type 31 parallel: presence needs numbersNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 8: Amphibious Warfare Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:27:23Why a modern Daring would be easier than a modern TribalQ&A
- An Introduction to Ships of the Convoy War - the Battle of Atlantic in Steel Part 3 Frigates16:05Loch-class frigates and Squid anti-submarine firepowerNotable Point
- An Introduction to Not the Big Ships: NGFS As Provided by Destroyers & Below Part 2 of 213:18Frigate guns as mobile artillery batteriesNotable Point
- Top 10 Ships – not Tribal, Battle, Daring or Town classes…2:13:48From Tribals and Darings to County-class destroyersQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 3: Imperial Japanese Navy Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:00:06Improving the Tribal, Battle, Town, and Daring classesQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 2b: Book Reviews/Q&A7:58Choosing a Daring over a GearingQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 2a: Book Reviews/Q&A1:43:21The hidden displacement cost of 1950s radarQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 1: Book Reviews/Q&A1:10:38Gunfire support depended on ships and ammunition systemsQ&A
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers - A live stream11:23What galleys reveal about destroyer missionsNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers - A live stream21:09Why the Battle class lacked a stern main turretNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers - A live stream23:41Weapons, radar, and the growth of British destroyersChapter
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers - A live stream24:44Daring-class size and the postwar presence missionChapter
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers - A live stream29:00The Daring class as a new postwar command designChapter
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers - A live stream32:24Escort numbers, crew retention, and deployable readinessChapter
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers - A live stream35:26Flotilla-scale construction enabled larger destroyersNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers - A live stream37:12From Tribal to Daring: cruiser-like destroyers for peace and warChapter
- The RN in 1939, more than just a Question of Geography - A Quarterdeck Talk (26/11/2019)22:42Tribals, Battle-class destroyers, and Darings in the cruiser roleChapter
- Back Pocket Cruisers Presentation (Practice 2)34:35The Daring class completed the move to general-purpose destroyersChapter