Related time notes
- Britain's Rearmament 1937 vs 2026: What Lessons are we forgetting?1:30:22Swordfish torpedoes and the problem of shallow waterChapter
- Britain's Rearmament 1937 vs 2026: What Lessons are we forgetting?1:33:36Strike aircraft need trained people and reliable sustainmentNotable Point
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:31:05Publicity for carriers and Henderson's case for the Fleet Air ArmNotable Point
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...44:34The F-35B's expected service lifeQ&A
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:59:59A stealth weapons pod for the F-35Q&A
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:01:40F-35B availability and the cost of a small fleetNotable Point
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:14:30Would an uncrewed F-35B cost half as much?Q&A
- What if Britain joined with Australian & Canada to build a 'Maximum' Invincible Class instead?1:26:49Joint procurement and carriers for the F-35BChapter
- Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...57:38Which pre-1950 ships could still serve with a light refit?Q&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live35:33Why the Royal Navy does not need a naval GCAPQ&A
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:41:19How the Fleet Air Arm may change over the next 30 yearsQ&A
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:24:01What anti-ship weapon may reach British F-35BsQ&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:30:50How to protect naval procurement across governmentsQ&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:05:42Twelve F-35As, conversion training, and nuclear availabilityNotable Point
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:40:44Defiant before a British F-35 amphibious shipQ&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:52:05Adapting Trieste for a Royal Navy LHDQ&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:31:51Why a Trieste-derived LHD does not need arresting wiresQ&A
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...6:05Why procurement announcements need their supporting infrastructureNotable Point
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...51:56Type 83, Type 32, and the risks behind an Anglo-Dutch LHD planQ&A
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:08:55Western fleets without the post-Cold War peace dividendQ&A
- Yak-38 Forger: The Nasty Surprise of the Kiev Class0:00Yak-38 as the other Cold War V/STOL fighterChapter
- Yak-38 Forger: The Nasty Surprise of the Kiev Class25:00Why six Yak-38s could still help a missile cruiserNotable Point
- Resurgent Japan, the "Destroyer Navy" of the 21st Century48:13Izumo adds fighters for identification and limited air defenceChapter
- Resurgent Japan, the "Destroyer Navy" of the 21st Century51:42Izumo's aircraft capacity limits the size of its submarine screenNotable Point
- Resurgent Japan, the "Destroyer Navy" of the 21st Century54:07Organic airborne early warning may require a larger successor to IzumoNotable Point
- How Ship Design is a reflection of Navy's attempts to balance technology, strategy and memory...45:25Aviation ships support expeditionary fleetsNotable Point
- What Happens if Australia, Canada & the UK go all in on the Invincibles in the 1970s? (Patreon Live)1:57:41Four Invincibles create a different successor fleetChapter
- Bruships 241: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:47:55F-35B weapon integration and Britain's carrier choicesQ&A
- Bruships 240: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:26:36Why a carrier air wing requires far more than 36 aircraftNotable Point
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:31:10Catapult reinforcement and vertical-landing limits on F-35BQ&A
- Do Armed Merchant Cruisers still make sense today?15:05How F-35B carrier operations depend on suppressing reconnaissanceQ&A
- Bruships 235: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:02:19Why ten Essex-class carriers cannot replace modern CVNsQ&A
- Where has Britain's Royal Navy Gone?2:38:27The 2021 carrier-group promise and its design compromisesChapter
- Bruships 232: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:35:51How navies qualify carrier pilots without a deck-capable trainerQ&A
- How many Warships does your Navy need?36:04An unrealized five-deck fleet could have shared F-35BsNotable Point
- The rise and fall of Constellation class Frigate program? (Patreon Live)3:24:32Why amphibious lift is part of blue-water powerQ&A
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3rd Start1:10:43The unresolved choice after the F-35BQ&A
- Trials and Tribulations- why ships go through the testing they do before they enter service1:36:00STOVL carriers can specialize in rapid air-defence launchesNotable Point
- Trials and Tribulations- why ships go through the testing they do before they enter service1:48:52One F-35B would make a frigate worse at its real jobQ&A
- Trials and Tribulations- why ships go through the testing they do before they enter service2:11:55Arming a Merlin for air combat displaces its ASW missionQ&A
- Trials and Tribulations- why ships go through the testing they do before they enter service2:22:52Routine aviation capability has to be designed into the shipNotable Point
- Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:15:50Can Trieste's lifts already handle the F-35B?Q&A
- Bruships 225: Naval History & Current Affairs Questions Answered Live...1:40:53The proposed British five-flight-deck force and aircraft commonalityNotable Point
- Future Fleets: Some Ideas of Naval Warfare9:37A Queen Elizabeth group shows post-Cold War fleet assumptionsChapter
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:25:00Ajax’s predecessors and the opportunity-cost argumentNotable Point
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:44:38Operational camouflage and Royal Navy aircraft coloursQ&A
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:58:14Why Italy is unlikely to replace Cavour with a CVNQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon56:48The space and mission problems in a nuclear missile battleshipQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon2:30:32When an F-35B would need to jettison stores before landingQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon2:39:34F-35B versus Super Hornet depends on the carrier missionQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War3:14:24When an amphibious assault ship becomes a sea-control carrierQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War5:51:09Why a navy might pair CATOBAR and STOVL carriersQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust5:32:06Why British carriers use ski jumps while US LHDs stay flatQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida55:17Modernizing Shokaku and Zuikaku for F-35B operationsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida1:09:52A medium power built around deployable naval groupsQ&A
- Bruships 219: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:30:51Britain's MRSS approaches an armed LHD by degreesQ&A
- Bruships 219: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:36:05Japanese carrier development after the Izumo classQ&A
- Izumo Class; Building for the future or planned preperation?14:08Aviation and transport capacity drove the larger hullChapter
- Izumo Class; Building for the future or planned preperation?15:44Carrier potential was preserved, but conversion was not effortlessNotable Point
- Izumo Class; Building for the future or planned preperation?29:18How the F-35B conversion became policyChapter
- Izumo Class; Building for the future or planned preperation?31:42Approval turned carrier potential into flight-deck workChapter
- Izumo Class; Building for the future or planned preperation?35:10Building a sustainable Izumo air groupChapter
- Izumo Class; Building for the future or planned preperation?38:53F-35B interoperability versus CATOBAR performanceNotable Point
- Izumo Class; Building for the future or planned preperation?45:19Alliances work like insurance only when members investNotable Point
- Maya Class: The Ultimate Arleigh Burke Flight IIA or something else?19:22Why Japan values very long-range anti-ship missilesNotable Point
- Maya Class: The Ultimate Arleigh Burke Flight IIA or something else?32:01How Maya fits Japan's graduated escort forceChapter
- Bruships 210: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:38:38How two Trieste-class LHDs would change the Royal NavyQ&A
- Bruships 206: Naval History Questions Answered Live...(Continued)18:52Why Britain's F-35Bs need more carrier trainingQ&A
- OTO Melara 76/62: Flexible Capability in ways that matter!34:12Flexible installations preserve coverage through failuresNotable Point
- Procurement for Peace: Second Draft1:49:43Spanish carrier aviation and India's fighter choicesQ&A
- Procurement for Peace: Second Draft1:53:23Britain's near-term fighter gap spans three programmesNotable Point
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:25:09A modern Royal Navy still dominates without submarines or nuclear weaponsQ&A
- Queen Bees: The almost 'Original Drones' from the 1930s33:22Why useful carrier drone pools must be largeNotable Point
- How has Ukraine confirmed, dispelled or updated the lessons of the Falklands War 1982?2:47:29How F-35A orders narrow Britain's carrier aircraft poolNotable Point
- How has Ukraine confirmed, dispelled or updated the lessons of the Falklands War 1982?2:49:52The lost five-flight-deck force structureQ&A
- How has Ukraine confirmed, dispelled or updated the lessons of the Falklands War 1982?3:03:39Why Britain chose STOVL instead of catapultsQ&A
- Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:50:35Why V/STOL payload penalties are not only about weightQ&A
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:34:29Carrier drones should match the Queen Elizabeth class's aviation systemQ&A
- Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers33:56P.125 and FOAS research folded into the F-35 choiceChapter
- Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers38:45Five common V/STOL flight decks offered greater flexibilityChapter
- Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers42:43F-35B completed a sixty-year search for a Super HarrierNotable Point
- Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...26:29Why dispersed STOVL hide sites are harder but not deadQ&A
- Bruships 193: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:38:30A supersonic STOVL aircraft reshapes the post-Falklands fleetQ&A
- Bruships 193: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:36:55Sketching a combined CANZUK fleetQ&A
- Bruships 193: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:18:03Buddy refueling for F-35B carrier operationsQ&A
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:48:59Why Britain is unlikely to navalize TempestQ&A
- Bruships 191: Naval History Questions Answered Live...8:29British F-35Bs on allied light carriersQ&A
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:04:53Why British work on the F-35 does not show American industrial weaknessQ&A
- Strategic Defence & Security Review 2025: What would a naval historian do?2:01:14Maritime air power needs genuinely joint ownershipChapter
- Strategic Defence & Security Review 2025: What would a naval historian do?2:03:30CATOBAR conversion would trade commonality for a new gapNotable Point
- Strategic Defence & Security Review 2025: What would a naval historian do?2:06:05Faster aircraft orders still need resilient logisticsNotable Point
- Strategic Defence & Security Review 2025: What would a naval historian do?2:39:24Do not retire old capability before its replacement arrivesNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!2:04:38Why the Queen Elizabeth class adopted STOVLQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:47:17Queen Elizabeth carriers if the F-35B failedQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:50:13Why Harrier could not cover a forty-year carrier lifeNotable Point
- Bruships 183: Science Fiction/Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:17:19How a navy could regenerate carrier air power in World War IIIQ&A
- Bruships 183: Science Fiction/Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:21:41F-35 variant choice and competing British aviation programsNotable Point
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:25:03A British supersonic STOVL fighter in the 1980sQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:31:09Why GCAP is unlikely to fly from Queen Elizabeth-class carriersQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:34:09Why Typhoon still needs upgrades while GCAP developsNotable Point
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:56:03Japan's F-35B ships as aviation escortsNotable Point
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:04:35Italy's next carrier: size, aircraft, and political fundingNotable Point
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?3:47:03If the F-35B had failedQ&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?16:52The Queen Elizabeth carriers and F-35B developed togetherQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 8: Beatty, Sopwith Cuckoos, Carriers & the Defence Debate...1:33:38How much range the F-35C gains over the F-35BNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 8: Beatty, Sopwith Cuckoos, Carriers & the Defence Debate...1:38:01Why Queen Elizabeth carrier air groups need more aircraftNotable Point
- Bruships 172: So the Historiophon Happened...1:53:35A German LHD requires an ocean-going task groupQ&A
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...18:01Why Britain chose the F-35B and STOVL carriersChapter
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...42:17Carrier sensors, fitted weapons, and aircraft capacityNotable Point
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...48:47How extra length changes hangar capacityNotable Point
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...52:49The 2010 CATOBAR reversal and carrier-strike gapChapter
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...59:11F-35B numbers and the Joint Force conceptChapter
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...1:07:59Carriers as diplomatic signalsNotable Point
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...1:10:17The allied carrier networkChapter
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...1:16:13F-35B cross-decking across allied shipsNotable Point
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...1:17:01Future carrier aircraft and electronic warfareNotable Point
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...1:19:50Why long-range uncrewed aircraft need onboard computingChapter
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/46:19:22A British supersonic V/STOL fighter would raise the bar for F-35BQ&A
- The Battlecruiser/Fast Battleship Differential & Soviet Carriers: Scuttlebutt 741:39Why an LHD can do more than a hospital shipNotable Point
- The Battlecruiser/Fast Battleship Differential & Soviet Carriers: Scuttlebutt 747:43Chinese carriers sharpen Japan's carrier choicesNotable Point
- The Battlecruiser/Fast Battleship Differential & Soviet Carriers: Scuttlebutt 748:32Why STOBAR is an awkward compromise for JapanNotable Point
- The Battlecruiser/Fast Battleship Differential & Soviet Carriers: Scuttlebutt 759:28The F-35B turns procurement rivalry into partnershipNotable Point
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 11:53:21A 1980s carrier fleet still serving with F-35sNotable Point
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 11:57:47Catapults and the cost of reducing carrier capacityChapter
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 12:00:31Would catapult-equipped Queen Elizabeth carriers need to be larger?Q&A
- Bruships 167: Tell me why, everything turned book – packing up, stacking up is all kalax want to do.3:40:20Why the three F-35 variants share a familyNotable Point
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....3:58:04CVL carriers and F-35sQ&A
- The Current Carrier Generation: War is over/War has yet to begin1:03:30CATOBAR, STOBAR, and STOVL as mission choicesChapter
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!2:49:59Why LHA light carriers do not relieve the CVN fleetQ&A
- The Nimitz Class: The Tenacious Ten that underpin America on the Global Stage1:40:13The limits of an allied thousand-ship navyChapter
- Drones & The Future of the Carrier Air Group - Patreon Premier23:58TCG Anadolu turns an F-35 gap into a drone programChapter
- Drones & The Future of the Carrier Air Group - Patreon Premier47:11The Royal Navy's incremental path to a mixed air groupChapter
- Super Carriers & Specialists: The Aircraft Carrier Debate from WWII to present...40:45Designing carriers for larger future aircraftChapter
- Super Carriers & Specialists: The Aircraft Carrier Debate from WWII to present...57:29Why every carrier programme repeats old argumentsNotable Point
- Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!1:56:30An Izumo conversion cannot match Queen Elizabeth scaleQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 2: H Class Battleships, Japanese Carrier Aircraft Design and lots more34:49A common V/STOL flight-deck fleet for BritainNotable Point
- Evolution of Carrier Air Groups 1918-2024: A Discussion28:13Aircraft growth drives carrier and air group tradeoffsChapter
- Evolution of Carrier Air Groups 1918-2024: A Discussion29:54Networked missiles reshape carrier air combatNotable Point
- Evolution of Carrier Air Groups 1918-2024: A Discussion35:47Sea Harrier and F-35 comparisons need historical contextNotable Point
- Evolution of Carrier Air Groups 1918-2024: A Discussion41:36Common aircraft can turn several flight decks into a flexible forceNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 1: Japanese Doctrine, Modern Naval Detterence, USNs dislike of small carriers & more!24:17Why an American LHD is not a complete fleet carrierNotable Point
- So You Want to Build an Aircraft Carrier: Design! Part 1 or 347:16Let deck choice shape independence and interoperabilityChapter
- Suggest Series Name Please: Comment Response video with a twist35:44Why eighteen aircraft became a carrier minimumNotable Point
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books1:36:43Why carrier mission sets drive carrier sizeQ&A
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books1:43:23Why modern aircraft change escort-carrier scaleNotable Point
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books2:11:55F-35B strike aviation across several naviesQ&A
- Aircraft Carriers in Science Fiction1:28:28When the air wing rivals the carrier's costNotable Point
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered3:47:34A third Queen Elizabeth versus two light carriersQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!3:38:16Why an Invincible could operate only a small F-35 forceQ&A
- Racking up the Fight Back: American Carrier raids of 19423:12:13Could a modified B-25 land on a Midway-class carrier?Q&A
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered2:55:54Why twelve aircraft is a normal carrier squadronQ&A
- 809 Squadron Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm: The Immortals12:30Why the Fleet Air Arm revived 809 SquadronChapter
- 809 Squadron Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm: The Immortals16:49A joint F-35 force shaped by squadron identityNotable Point
- 809 Squadron Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm: The Immortals53:58The F-35 era depends on more than fightersChapter
- What kind of Carrier do you need or want?1:02:48Why Queen Elizabeth can be a fleet or strike carrierNotable Point
- What kind of Carrier do you need or want?1:09:54Amphibious aviation ships serve a different mission from fleet carriersChapter
- Patreon 94: The different types of Aircraft Carriers/Seaplane Carriers/Hybrids1:51:48CATOBAR versus STOVL depends on the whole fleetChapter
- Patreon 94: The different types of Aircraft Carriers/Seaplane Carriers/Hybrids2:22:48A common STOVL fleet multiplies usable flight decksNotable Point
- Bruships 125: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series43:08Why an F-35B is not a quick CATOBAR conversionQ&A
- Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture3:21:46Japan's helicopter destroyers as a path back to carriersNotable Point
- Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture3:33:21Why a frigate deck is a poor routine base for V/STOL aircraftQ&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy46:24Why Trieste fits British F-35B operations better than MistralQ&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy3:00:18Why Britain favored STOVL carrier commonalityQ&A
- Bruships 115: Hopefully Australia Trip in Summary!2:41:11F-35B supports a more resilient British fleetQ&A
- Bruships 115: Hopefully Australia Trip in Summary!3:02:56The RAF had reasons to retain Joint Force HarrierQ&A
- Bruships 110: Naval Aviation1:16:40Why adding EMALS would be more than a catapult refitQ&A
- Timberborne: A Test for the Year of Technology/My students favourite 'engineering game'1:32:09Izumo's shift from helicopter destroyer to light carrierQ&A
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat3:33:38A modern Queen Elizabeth carrier in the First World WarQ&A
- Bruships 93: Soviet Navy Books & Random Books3:49:09F-35 dimensions are not enough to revive an InvincibleQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 31:20:56Why HMS Queen Elizabeth deployed to the United StatesQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 22:12:46Crew transfers between Britain's two carriersQ&A
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today40:26The limits of converting container ships into light carriersQ&A
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today42:06Pairing fleet carriers with amphibious flight decksNotable Point
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today51:16Why recovery is harder than launch on an improvised carrierQ&A
- Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack32:23Why Britain is unlikely to navalise TempestQ&A
- Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack2:29:39Why the F-35B could fight wartime aircraftQ&A
- Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions1:47:44Britain's carrier and sixth-generation fighter choicesQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 21:36:38Why ski jumps improve STOVL carrier operationsQ&A
- Patreon 53: Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN25:30Why aircraft remain useful launch platforms for hypersonic weaponsQ&A
- Patreon 53: Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN2:17:45A carrier and LHD mix for British aviation depthChapter
- Patreon 53: Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN2:23:27How many British aviation ships are enough?Q&A
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...2:38:08Why U.S. Marines valued British carrier deploymentsQ&A
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...3:28:22The Royal Navy's most serious capability gapsQ&A
- Bruships 73: Some Old, Some New, None Borrowed, but Some Blue1:47:44Why a future Royal Navy LHD would need to exceed the Canberra classQ&A
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment3:38:09Converting Queen Elizabeth carriers to catapultsQ&A
- Bruships 69: The Decider6:25Why two large carriers led to LHD thinkingQ&A
- Bruships 69: The Decider22:55Why the Royal Navy would avoid the BalticQ&A
- Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...54:01STOVL aircraft as a medium-power fleet systemQ&A
- Bruships 62: Naval History Book Review & Chat2:28:03Why a common F-35B fleet can simplify a smaller navyQ&A
- Patreon 36: Repair Ships, Depot Ships, Tenders and Stores Ships...3:09:13Why treat the F-35 intake-cover story cautiously?Q&A
- Bruships 60: Covid Jab, Bad Back & New Books3:00:22A modern carrier group against BismarckQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)1:10:33Why a larger twin-engine carrier aircraft costs deck capacityQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (7)3:13:14From littoral strike ships to a three-LHD forceQ&A
- Patreon 34: Inter-war Naval Aircraft Development - what could have been?3:38:57Why Britain sometimes used American aircraft differentlyQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (6)3:48:15Why a supertanker is not a fast carrier conversionQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (6)4:23:03Why the F-35B fits Britain's flight-deck problemQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (5)1:21:42Single versus twin engines for naval F-35 variantsQ&A
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper47:28Why logistics should receive new defence money firstNotable Point
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper2:16:15Why air-group logistics argue against adding the OspreyQ&A
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper2:47:22Buying carriers without enough aircraftNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (4)5:03:26Joint RAF and Royal Navy F-35B procurementQ&A
- Patreon 30: Japanese hybrid warships of WW22:52:27What a modern missile battlecarrier might requireQ&A
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions2:13:46Modern Britain in 1939 would win early but face a supply clockQ&A
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions2:23:19A modern Queen Elizabeth would dominate the 1982 air warQ&A
- Bruships 52: A Year of Bruships - Questions & Books2:59:17What seventy extra meters would give the Queen Elizabeth classNotable Point
- Bruships 52: A Year of Bruships - Questions & Books3:03:20Why the Royal Navy can mix F-35B ships with catapult-launched dronesNotable Point
- Bruships 52: A Year of Bruships - Questions & Books3:07:55STOVL commonality across allied carrier decksQ&A
- Bruships 52: A Year of Bruships - Questions & Books3:29:54Why a flat deck does not make an aircraft carrierNotable Point
- Bruships 52: A Year of Bruships - Questions & Books3:42:05LHDs as forward F-35B rearming pointsNotable Point
- Bruships 52: A Year of Bruships - Questions & Books4:05:28Why U.S. amphibs omit ski jumpsQ&A
- Pseudo Patreon British Aircraft Carrier development Since 1945 (as suggested by Kyle Hardman)2:23:37Balancing carriers and amphibious ships for a medium powerNotable Point
- Pseudo Patreon British Aircraft Carrier development Since 1945 (as suggested by Kyle Hardman)2:28:53Why CATOBAR conversion would not suit Queen ElizabethQ&A
- Pseudo Patreon British Aircraft Carrier development Since 1945 (as suggested by Kyle Hardman)2:29:47Where drones might fit on a Queen Elizabeth-class deckQ&A
- Bruships 43: Aircraft Carriers & Naval Aviation13:26A three-percent defence budget built around deployable naval forcesQ&A
- Bruships 43: Aircraft Carriers & Naval Aviation22:17Why fewer aircraft types simplify carrier logisticsNotable Point
- Bruships 43: Aircraft Carriers & Naval Aviation34:41How a carrier group counters a saturation strikeQ&A
- Bruships 43: Aircraft Carriers & Naval Aviation38:11Queen Elizabeth class sortie generation without catapultsNotable Point
- Bruships 43: Aircraft Carriers & Naval Aviation40:24F-35 numbers and a mixed crewed-uncrewed air groupQ&A
- Bruships 43: Aircraft Carriers & Naval Aviation1:03:04Dual-qualified pilots add flexibility to a carrier air groupNotable Point
- Bruships 43: Aircraft Carriers & Naval Aviation4:11:32America-class LHAs already test the light-carrier ideaQ&A
- Bruships 42: Some More Scifi55:28A longer Queen Elizabeth hull and the cost of more hangar spaceNotable Point
- Bruships 40: Favourite Books to Use When Writing...18:04Why forty-eight F-35Bs need not be the final British totalQ&A
- Bruships 40: Favourite Books to Use When Writing...34:40Balancing carrier air groups and shore trainingQ&A
- Bruships 36: International Relations2:30:27The 2021 estimate for Britain's eventual F-35 fleetNotable Point
- Town Class; big impact with a light footprint2:54:52A two-ocean fleet design for CanadaQ&A
- The Fairey Story Anew...2:54:34How maintainable did the F-35B appear in 2020?Q&A
- The Fairey Story Anew...3:01:56The Queen Elizabeth-class air group was still building toward strength in 2020Q&A
- Patreon 11: "The effect of the early jet age on naval warfare strategy/tactics?"3:01:55Canada's High North support-ship choiceQ&A
- Bruships 25 - Some More Naval Aviation26:17Carrier engineering depends on fleet requirementsNotable Point
- Bruships 25 - Some More Naval Aviation3:41:28Merlin AEW instead of an expensive Osprey conversionQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 14: Special & Covert Operations Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:42:42Container ships as modern escort-carrier conversionsQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 12: New to Me Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:28:32Why the F-35B remained the available choiceQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 12: New to Me Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:49:23Could an upgraded Harrier replace the F-35B?Q&A
- 50th Proper Live Stream - Bru Ships Episode 10: Naval Warfare Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:39:03How F-35 variants fit US carrier operationsQ&A
- 4000 Subscribers Thankyou Special – The Royal Navy if I were Prime Minister10:30Queen Elizabeth-class troop and air group optionsNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 4: Naval Aviation Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A45:19Why the F-35B makes sense for BritainQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 4: Naval Aviation Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:04:46America-class ships show the politics of ski jumpsQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 4: Naval Aviation Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:20:42A ski jump could expose the carrier-cost debateQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 2b: Book Reviews/Q&A26:59How F-35Bs would transform a Falklands scenarioQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 2a: Book Reviews/Q&A54:02Why Britain resists adding a dedicated Osprey tanker fleetQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 2a: Book Reviews/Q&A1:09:29Why Queen Elizabeth did not need catapultsQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 2a: Book Reviews/Q&A1:14:41STOVL decks and allied carrier interoperabilityQ&A
- A Name to illustrate a navy - HMS Leander through history1:14:02F-35B and the value of multiple flight decksQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 1: Book Reviews/Q&A24:22Japan's helicopter destroyers become aircraft carriers in practiceQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 1: Book Reviews/Q&A42:31Joint F-35 ownership made training the carrier constraintQ&A