Naval Historywith Dr. Alex

Q&A · 1:47:44-1:48:09

Why a future Royal Navy LHD would need to exceed the Canberra class

The proposed amphibious replacement is sized by the requirement to operate F-35Bs rather than by the presence of a ski jump alone.

Amphibious WarfareCanberra Class Landing Helicopter DocksF-35BLHDRoyal NavyTrieste Class Amphibious Assault Ships
Watch at this timeFull video guide
Question

Would a Canberra-class design meet the proposed Royal Navy LHD requirement?

Short answer

No; a Trieste-like ship, probably somewhat larger and properly equipped for F-35Bs, would be a better basis.

Notes

The Canberra class is rejected as a direct model because its aviation facilities are not arranged for sustained F-35B operations. The Italian Trieste is offered as a more suitable starting point, though the British ship might need to be slightly larger. That choice aligns the amphibious hull with the earlier proposal for ships able to supplement the strike carriers in an emergency. A ski jump alone does not provide the full aviation facilities needed to operate those aircraft.