The ships were built to a high standard despite construction delays and immediately attracted Chinese claims that they were disguised aircraft carriers. A narrower reading is that Japan bought carrier potential rather than a covert carrier already ready for sustained jet operations. Generous internal space kept the option open, in contrast to Australia's decision to remove F-35B support features from the Canberra-class design and the later cost of reconsidering them. Izumo's original trapezoidal bow, flight-deck and hull stressing, and hangar spacing still imposed real limits. An F-35B might have used the ship in an emergency, but repeated fixed-wing sorties required the structural and deck changes later adopted. The distinction between latent capacity and an operational carrier is the central procurement lesson in this passage.
Notable Point ยท 15:44-18:48
Carrier potential was preserved, but conversion was not effortless
Japan preserved the option to make Izumo a carrier, yet its original bow, deck, and hangar were not ready for sustained fixed-wing operations.