Q&A · 1:10:33-1:11:27

Why a larger twin-engine carrier aircraft costs deck capacity

A wide aircraft built around two F-35B engines might carry more fuel and weapons, but each airframe would consume more of a carrier's fixed hangar and deck space.

Question

Would a larger Royal Navy carrier aircraft built around two F-35B engines be practical?

Short answer

It might offer more internal capacity, but its width would sharply reduce how many aircraft fit aboard the existing carriers.

Notes

The proposed design separates two F-35B engines to create a larger internal bay for fuel and weapons. That arrangement would make the aircraft exceptionally wide while the carrier and its hangar remain fixed in size. The Queen Elizabeth class's twin-island layout might make a hull extension conceptually possible, but cutting and lengthening the ships would be difficult and expensive. Without such a major alteration, each wider aircraft displaces more parked and maintained aircraft. Greater capability in one airframe can therefore reduce the total number embarked.