Related time notes
- Japanese Destroyers of WWII: Quantity is a Quality of it's own, it can also be a Decisive one34:14Treaty withdrawal and destroyer spending prioritiesNotable Point
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:47:08Germany buying South American dreadnoughtsQ&A
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?0:00What would delaying the Washington Treaty until 1927 change?Q&A
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?20:34Treaty extensions and different expectations of peaceChapter
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?1:13:38A 1927 treaty based on construction quotasChapter
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?1:15:44Existing large ships change a later displacement ceilingNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?1:16:25Twenty ships on paper do not mean twenty availableNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?1:18:19A decade of continuous construction in improving pairsNotable Point
- Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:32:09Naval staff priorities after the First World WarQ&A
- Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:56:41The Washington Treaty becomes a personhood dispute in Azur LaneQ&A
- Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:13:36A carrier ban favours land-based air power and treaty loopholesQ&A
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 216:18A Tiger-like Hood and the Washington treatyQ&A
- Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:59:18How extra signatories could break naval treaty negotiationsQ&A
- What would need to change for HMAS Australia & HMS New Zealand to be retained under Washington?34:39A separate Washington category could preserve battlecruisersChapter
- What would need to change for HMAS Australia & HMS New Zealand to be retained under Washington?45:33Scheduled construction could expand Dominion fleetsChapter
- What would need to change for HMAS Australia & HMS New Zealand to be retained under Washington?53:51Different fast wings could preserve Anglo-American parityNotable Point
- What changes if the Royal Navy gets a Proper Staff in 1905, instead relying on NID for everything?1:11:36Dominion sea power changes the postwar treaty problemChapter
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…59:44Could an interwar missile ship qualify as an auxiliary?Q&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…1:03:21Slowing a battleship does not make it a treaty auxiliaryQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…1:10:00What an early naval-treaty escalator clause changesQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…1:10:50Did the interwar naval treaties make matters better?Q&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…1:14:33Italy's strategic aims in the treaty settlementNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…1:15:04Japan's desired 70 percent treaty ratioNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…1:47:31How an Allied Ottoman Empire complicates naval arms controlChapter
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…1:51:27More treaty participants mean more arguments over naval rankQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War7:13:08How building holidays weakened Japanese confidenceNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War8:13:37Why treaty exemptions did not guarantee sloop ordersNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War8:42:34A Washington treaty without a building holidayQ&A
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?0:00Why Dominion navies shared Britain's treaty allocationChapter
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?3:19Treaty export rules meet wartime requisitionNotable Point
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?5:56The strategic gamble behind Washington disarmamentNotable Point
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?9:29Cruisers compensate Australia for losing its flagshipNotable Point
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?11:31A battlecruiser category for Dominion flagshipsChapter
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?16:24A 15-inch compromise and faster carriersNotable Point
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?28:43A slow building rate keeps naval industry aliveNotable Point
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?1:13:16France must answer Italian fast capital shipsNotable Point
- Bruships 215 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...41:37Could surplus treaty ships remain useful abroad?Q&A
- Bruships 215 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:22:37Why Britain treated the County class as light cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 215 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:39:35Treaty-era British battleship replacement cadenceQ&A
- Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:56:56Why Washington defined an aircraft carrier above 10,000 tonsNotable Point
- The Atlantic Charter: Signed 14th of August 1941...84 yrs ago today!1:04:09Welfare, freedom of the seas, and the disarmament problemChapter
- The Atlantic Charter: Signed 14th of August 1941...84 yrs ago today!1:31:50International organisations pool national sovereigntyNotable Point
- Bruships 206: Naval History Questions Answered Live...37:02A larger Royal Navy reshapes WashingtonQ&A
- WWII Submarines that served the Polish, Greek, Dutch & Norwegian Navys35:59Why interwar navies hesitated over submarine minesNotable Point
- Bruships 204: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:45:44A 15-inch gun limit at the Washington Naval ConferenceQ&A
- Bruships 204: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:57:31A naval treaty that limits numbers without stopping constructionQ&A
- Bruships 201: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:22:32What peace might follow an early German defeat?Q&A
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?2:53:38Would Dominion capital ships survive into World War II?Q&A
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?3:10:26What would later naval treaties regulate?Q&A
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?3:16:21Could treaties give battlecruisers their own category?Q&A
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?3:24:47How the United States might answer Canadian battlecruisersQ&A
- How Pursuing Peace(with bonus cost cutting) can lead to War: 1930s London Naval Treaty Leadership0:37Why peace through naval weakness could invite warChapter
- How Pursuing Peace(with bonus cost cutting) can lead to War: 1930s London Naval Treaty Leadership19:49Who won the naval treaties changes with hindsightNotable Point
- How Pursuing Peace(with bonus cost cutting) can lead to War: 1930s London Naval Treaty Leadership23:47Hamaguchi and Saionji use naval limits to buy timeNotable Point
- How Pursuing Peace(with bonus cost cutting) can lead to War: 1930s London Naval Treaty Leadership26:08Japan's coerced opening shapes treaty insecurityNotable Point
- How Pursuing Peace(with bonus cost cutting) can lead to War: 1930s London Naval Treaty Leadership28:42How Italy escaped the treaty's cumulative limitsChapter
- How Pursuing Peace(with bonus cost cutting) can lead to War: 1930s London Naval Treaty Leadership1:22:38The treaty saves pennies but costs poundsChapter
- Leadership of the 1930 London Naval Treaty13:09Politicians take control of the London Naval TreatyChapter
- Leadership of the 1930 London Naval Treaty15:23How the verdict on the naval treaties changedNotable Point
- Leadership of the 1930 London Naval Treaty29:11Why negotiate a peace treaty when nobody is at war?Q&A
- Leadership of the 1930 London Naval Treaty53:51A bright idea is not yet a naval-policy solutionNotable Point
- Leadership of the 1930 London Naval Treaty1:21:04Interwar optimism meets the Great DepressionChapter
- Leadership of the 1930 London Naval Treaty1:27:14Distinguishing Washington from the later London restrictionsNotable Point
- Leadership of the 1930 London Naval Treaty2:54:37Why changing the negotiators changes the treatyQ&A
- Leadership of the 1930 London Naval Treaty2:56:15Were auxiliary ships exempt from tonnage limits?Q&A
- Leadership of the 1930 London Naval Treaty2:56:54Could a repair ship conceal preparations for heavy guns?Q&A
- Leadership of the 1930 London Naval Treaty3:01:18Why treaty loopholes were not exploited without limitQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 9 - A long time coming...13:01How prescriptive naval treaties limited fleet adaptationNotable Point
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:14:36Why a 15,500-ton treaty cruiser limit was unlikelyQ&A
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:18:26How Japan might treat a 15,500-ton cruiser limitQ&A
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?5:47Roosevelt, Taft, and the politics of an American treaty initiativeChapter
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?15:06Why Britain would reject ratios and naval equalityChapter
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?21:17Japan's navy as the foundation of great-power securityChapter
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?32:59Why postwar governments had reasons to limit naval spendingNotable Point
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?39:01Why a Washington-style treaty cannot work in 1909Chapter
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?41:39Armaments industry made naval restraint an economic questionNotable Point
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?47:27Fleet ratios ignore the geography of imperial commitmentsNotable Point
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?49:45The plausible treaty: cap individual ships, not fleetsChapter
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?54:33A qualitative cap turns every rivalry into a numbers raceNotable Point
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?56:20Competition moves into speed and power densityNotable Point
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?1:02:34Italy can optimize for the Mediterranean but loses its qualitative escapeChapter
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?1:09:44Dreadnought growth quickly outpaces the treaty limitChapter
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?1:13:33Warship exports create a non-signatory loopholeNotable Point
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?1:14:28Displacement evasions would erode the treatyChapter
- The Admiralty: A Contest of Leadership with Management... Naval History Live3:07:34Charles Madden balances cruiser needs against treaty limitsChapter
- The Admiralty: A Contest of Leadership with Management... Naval History Live3:18:31Madden uses overage cruisers to bridge treaty limitsNotable Point
- Bruships 177: New Year, same Dr Alex... possibly with new gym membership2:55:03Why unrestricted German shipbuilding threatened the armisticeQ&A
- What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?6:40The Washington treaty permitted two British capital ships without requiring 16-inch gunsChapter
- What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?1:15:16The London treaty might answer the speed gap with scheduled capital-ship constructionChapter
- What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?1:24:02Renewed battleship building would force a new carrier bargainChapter
- Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...6:04The Washington treaty sets the British design boxChapter
- Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...1:07:55Presenting 15-inch guns as naval restraintNotable Point
- Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...1:56:19A London treaty bargain permits new battleshipsChapter
- Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...2:04:48Why a construction holiday disadvantaged JapanNotable Point
- Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...2:07:32Naval treaties tolerated a bounded margin of misstatementNotable Point
- Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...2:23:42New treaty quotas accelerate Italian and French design choicesNotable Point
- Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...2:58:53Japan's 10:7 demand changes the treaty fleet balanceNotable Point
- Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...3:13:45Earlier Alaska-type cruisers would depend on the treatiesNotable Point
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/41:43:04Essay scenario: an equitable treaty and rolling constructionChapter
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/42:08:07Why a 16-inch-gun landing ship would breach treaty logicQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/42:19:03How a 1936 naval-treaty collapse could reshape British capital shipsQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/45:15:10How a larger Brazilian battle fleet could alter naval treatiesQ&A
- Frigating Tiger Cubs: WWI if the Royal Navy builds some 9.2in armed 'Dreadnought Cruisers'2:00:31Tiger Cubs rewrite postwar cruiser and treaty categoriesChapter
- Frigating Tiger Cubs: WWI if the Royal Navy builds some 9.2in armed 'Dreadnought Cruisers'2:01:30An early peace could erase the Washington Naval TreatyNotable Point
- Frigating Tiger Cubs: WWI if the Royal Navy builds some 9.2in armed 'Dreadnought Cruisers'2:04:17A 20,000-ton cruiser changes every treaty categoryNotable Point
- Frigating Tiger Cubs: WWI if the Royal Navy builds some 9.2in armed 'Dreadnought Cruisers'2:06:45Existing cruisers and carrier duties shape fleet quotasNotable Point
- Frigating Tiger Cubs: WWI if the Royal Navy builds some 9.2in armed 'Dreadnought Cruisers'2:09:31A higher treaty ceiling permits faster British battleshipsNotable Point
- Frigating Tiger Cubs: WWI if the Royal Navy builds some 9.2in armed 'Dreadnought Cruisers'2:10:51Why a 10-inch treaty maximum could favour 9.2-inch gunsNotable Point
- Bruships 169: Kalax o Kalax, my kingdom for a Kalax...2:24:04Adding Spain and Brazil destabilizes Washington treaty arithmeticQ&A
- Bruships 169: Kalax o Kalax, my kingdom for a Kalax...2:45:02Treaty-power Spain changes both world-war coalition calculationsQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!2:34:30What Britain could build after abandoning treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!2:38:46If treaty destroyers displaced 3,000 tonsQ&A
- Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat38:33Why Washington fails without JapanQ&A
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat1:13:30Starting King George V-class construction in 1933Q&A
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat2:17:50Higher treaty limits would not resolve the naval balance problemQ&A
- Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!47:48A delayed Washington treaty could leave G3s afloatQ&A
- Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!1:07:09The treaty exemptions that preserved sloops and gunboatsQ&A
- Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!1:29:44Removing cumulative limits changes carrier constructionQ&A
- Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!1:34:18Why Italy abandoned the compliant Trento proposalQ&A
- Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!2:16:15German 25,000-ton ships alarm every treaty navyQ&A
- Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!2:23:53Eight Ryujos could break the 1930 carrier settlementQ&A
- Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!2:53:12Exporting capital-ship parts tests treaty wordingQ&A
- Bruships 159: New Office - This may be quick, discord may work & I may not have a Pneumonia attack!43:12Extra American battlecruisers would pressure the Washington treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 159: New Office - This may be quick, discord may work & I may not have a Pneumonia attack!1:24:47The First London Naval Treaty said little about seaplane carriersQ&A
- Bruships 159: New Office - This may be quick, discord may work & I may not have a Pneumonia attack!1:49:10A 9.2-inch limit could turn Courageous-size hulls into armored cruisersQ&A
- Check Campaign 23: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:45:3718-inch guns and a Washington Treaty counterfactualChapter
- Scuttlebutt 2: H Class Battleships, Japanese Carrier Aircraft Design and lots more1:25:31Five fast Nelson-style ships in the Tillman treaty scenarioQ&A
- Check Campaign 18: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign58:03Could Germany have gone directly to 16-inch guns?Q&A
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign15:48Dunkerque, Richelieu, and France's two-theater problemQ&A
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:07:20Treaty limits and self-escorting capital shipsNotable Point
- Imperial Russia Survives WWI: A Patreon Requested Alternate History44:55Russia breaks the Washington treaty tonnage ratiosChapter
- Imperial Russia Survives WWI: A Patreon Requested Alternate History49:57Ship-by-ship limits replace fleet ratiosChapter
- Check Campaign 6: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:47:26Roosevelt, Tillman, and a different naval treatyQ&A
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered2:12:44An unscuttled High Seas Fleet complicates the treaty systemQ&A
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered3:48:05Britain and America rearm when Japan leaves the treatiesQ&A
- What changes if Helicopters are at their third generation in 1939?19:33Arms control can redirect military competitionNotable Point
- HMS Unicorn: Honestly Not An Aircraft Carrier - Key Ship Series 8, Ship 10:00Naval treaties created opportunities as well as constraintsChapter
- HMS Unicorn: Honestly Not An Aircraft Carrier - Key Ship Series 8, Ship 134:08Unicorn could have become the first of a support fleetNotable Point
- Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō12:16The treaty loophole behind small carriersChapter
- Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō16:31Why 10,000 tons also became the cruiser ceilingNotable Point
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...23:17A generous carrier-conversion rule would favor the United StatesQ&A
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...35:32Without naval treaties, carrier fleets converge on large and small typesQ&A
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...1:37:27A 17,000-ton cruiser crosses the Washington Treaty's capital-ship lineQ&A
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...1:46:18Britain and the United States still hoped Japan would returnQ&A
- Graf Zeppelin: KSS2 S1 Comment Response20:31How British practice shaped naval treaty rulesQ&A
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty0:01Why make battlecruisers a separate treaty category?Chapter
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty36:14A treaty each power has reason to keepNotable Point
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty39:49Why Washington wanted Britain's older capital ships goneNotable Point
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty1:13:01Could a stronger Washington settlement improve London?Notable Point
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty1:04:51What replaces the historical capital-ship building holiday?Q&A
- Bittern Class: The Foundation Stone of the British WWII ASW efforts - Key Ship Series 5, Episode 108:03Treaty speed limits shaped the Bitterns' machineryChapter
- Bittern Class: The Foundation Stone of the British WWII ASW efforts - Key Ship Series 5, Episode 1014:54Sloops traded torpedoes and speed for treaty-compliant escort workChapter
- Bittern Class: The Foundation Stone of the British WWII ASW efforts - Key Ship Series 5, Episode 1026:43Nine sloops a year offered a treaty-era escort alternativeChapter
- Joffre Class: Too Many Enemies - Key Ship Series 5, Epsiode 520:38Treaty parity left France defending both a frontier and an empireChapter
- Joffre Class: Too Many Enemies - Key Ship Series 5, Epsiode 521:46Naval constructors could read secrets in plain sightNotable Point
- Joffre Class: Too Many Enemies - Key Ship Series 5, Epsiode 526:33Two carriers competed with wholesale fleet recapitalizationChapter
- Dutch Dream of 1913: A Dreadnought Battle Fleet of their very own - Key Ship Series 4, Ship 540:00What if the Dutch had ordered in 1911?Chapter
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...6:11American status, spending, and Senate ratificationChapter
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...16:24Industrial capacity behind American arms controlNotable Point
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...27:46Treaty limits and the problem of enforcementNotable Point
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...40:10Why one Commonwealth navy mattered to the ratiosNotable Point
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...59:11French disarmament required German weaknessNotable Point
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...1:24:45How naval limits could deepen later fearChapter
- What the Governments at the 1922 Washington Treaty wanted...1:27:14Testing treaty arithmetic with an Australian capital shipNotable Point
- Bruships 115: Hopefully Australia Trip in Summary!2:19:36A modified treaty could preserve battleship-building skillsQ&A
- Bruships 115: Hopefully Australia Trip in Summary!2:24:22American war debts were weaker treaty leverage than fearedQ&A
- Some Books Aquired So Far in #NavHistAus23! Brisbane41:38Why treaty-era sloops stayed below 2,000 tonsQ&A
- Some Books Aquired So Far in #NavHistAus23! Brisbane49:02Why an indirectly bound navy might observe treaty limitsQ&A
- Patreon 79: AH - WW1 incidents happen that bring the US enters war on the side of Germany...2:53:01A short, damaging war could reshape naval limitsNotable Point
- Patreon 79: AH - WW1 incidents happen that bring the US enters war on the side of Germany...2:58:28Neutrality also rewrites Versailles and the naval raceQ&A
- Lexington Class Battle Cruisers: Key Ship Series 2, Ship 426:56What treaty limits removed from naval planningChapter
- Graf Zeppelin: Key Ships Series 2, Ship 146:08From treaty allowance to an overloaded carrier briefChapter
- Graf Zeppelin: Key Ships Series 2, Ship 156:43Carrier ownership as a claim to great-power statusNotable Point
- Bruships 107: Some New to Me Books & Some New from Pen & Sword31:25Revealing Washington Treaty intelligenceQ&A
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?1:16:48Completed fast battleships could force higher treaty limitsChapter
- A potential American Response to the 18in HMS Agincourt?42:14Agincourt could change Washington, not VersaillesNotable Point
- A potential American Response to the 18in HMS Agincourt?2:52:38The design cost of an 18-inch treaty maximumChapter
- A potential American Response to the 18in HMS Agincourt?3:07:39Imagining a world where 18-inch guns become the limitChapter
- Bruships 92: New Books, Naval Chat and Late 19th Century Warships...2:37:28British public support for abolishing submarinesQ&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 6432:13Did Hood's size trap Britain at Washington?Q&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 641:34:38Forty thousand tons could rescue the KGV quadruple turretQ&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 641:38:38A 40,000-ton Nelson becomes an early fast battleshipQ&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 642:02:20Deutschlands and the logic of cheating properlyChapter
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 642:08:03Would broader naval treaties have worked better?Q&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Patreon 642:13:34A British super cruiser as a fleet-design release valveQ&A
- Bruships 85: Cruiser, New & Random Reading19:30Germany's capital-ship limits after World War IQ&A
- Projecting Mussonlini's Mare Nostrum: Italian 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine2:48Were G3 battlecruisers intended for 16-inch or 16.5-inch guns?Q&A
- Projecting Mussonlini's Mare Nostrum: Italian 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine44:52Naval treaties make cruisers Italy's status unitsChapter
- Projecting Mussonlini's Mare Nostrum: Italian 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine1:12:06Would Italian carriers change British planning?Q&A
- Projecting Mussonlini's Mare Nostrum: Italian 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine2:52:39Italian cruiser doctrine remains caught between two fleetsChapter
- Projecting Mussonlini's Mare Nostrum: Italian 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine3:00:16Naval treaties made blatant cheating a US trade riskNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)4:15Disarmament, balance, and deterrenceChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)12:00The London Treaty's destroyer rulesChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)15:41Category transfers complicated treaty complianceNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)18:13Japanese destroyers and treaty incentivesNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)20:39The 1936 treaty left destroyers loosely definedChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)22:23The Washington cruiser loophole and industrial capacityNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)26:28Historical ceilings produced small destroyer fleetsNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)29:34A 10:10:7:4:4 destroyer settlementChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)39:12Mediterranean navies feared a second destroyer raceNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)40:29Soviet participation changes Japan's strategic balanceNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)42:11Make the flotilla the treaty unitChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)47:12The treaty underfunded wartime fleet screeningChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)0:54The treaty category that small carriers never receivedChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)4:35Treaty rules and wartime contingency planningNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)7:20A two-tier fleet and light-carrier systemChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)13:22Why the 1936 rules quickly lost practical forceNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)23:23How naval treaties are negotiated outside the formal roomNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)24:59Article I paused capital ships, not all warshipsNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)25:40The 1930 treaty defines the aircraft carrierChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)38:35A treaty needs ships Japan can actually buildNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)46:52Lexington and Saratoga set the real carrier benchmarkChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)54:17The proposed equitable carrier settlementChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)1:05:06Higher treaty limits favor the strongest shipbuilding powersNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)1:08:00Using limited fleets to bind Germany and the Soviet UnionChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)1:14:11Multilateral limits instead of a later bilateral dealNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)1:16:59Treaty tonnage, not indifference, constrained British carriersNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)6:02How four G3 hulls might become aircraft carriersNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)14:48Why the counterfactual keeps a 16-inch gun ceilingNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)18:52Why an arms-control treaty cannot maximize one side's victoryNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)32:26Carrier tonnage, conversions, and the transition to new buildsChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)35:20A carrier-conversion loophole and the treaty's enforcement gapNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)50:35Why national emotion matters in treaty designNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)54:46Balanced deterrence as the equitable treaty's goalChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Overall Equitable Treaty & Summary (Long Patrol)1:01:12How to build a historically bounded treaty counterfactualNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Other Ships & Fortifications (Long Patrol)8:21The 5:5:3 ratio stopped below capital shipsChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Other Ships & Fortifications (Long Patrol)19:45Who shaped the treaty-cruiser ceiling?Notable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Other Ships & Fortifications (Long Patrol)30:09Why the equitable rewrite keeps the cruiser ceilingNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Other Ships & Fortifications (Long Patrol)38:36A more equitable fortification compromiseChapter
- Scapa Flow: A History & A Future? (Long Patrol for Patreon 52)32:22How the scuttling changed the postwar naval settlementNotable Point
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)23:49Writing treaty rules without inviting evasionsQ&A
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)30:28Security as the basis of treaty stabilityQ&A
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)31:37Do not write a treaty that requires lyingQ&A
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)35:41A 10:7 ratio and Japanese securityQ&A
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)36:53Choosing a Washington baseline for the London treatiesQ&A
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)44:03A proposal to balance cruiser limits and unfinished battleshipsNotable Point
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)44:59Why automatic escalation has a practical ceilingQ&A
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)46:23Aircraft carrier limits are deferred to part twoQ&A
- More Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)57:14Two baselines for an equitable London treatyNotable Point
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)52:48Would merged treaty tonnage favour carriers?Q&A
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)55:02Why submarines wait for the London treatiesQ&A
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)55:11Treaty ratios, industrial capacity, and political willNotable Point
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)1:05:51Experimental carriers still counted against treaty tonnageQ&A
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)1:10:13Why treaty limits could holdQ&A
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)1:16:41Allocating carrier forces by theatreQ&A
- Bruships 76: Five New Books & a Lot of New Questions1:04:21Why a modern Washington naval treaty needs many partiesQ&A
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)51:54Continuous construction as industrial deterrenceNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)53:40Conversion deadlines and carrier service livesNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)1:24:29Treaty limits, security, and deterrenceChapter
- Battle of Singapore Straits (Equitable Washington Treaty Scenario): A UAD Infused(Long Patrol)1:00:29Disarmament and the illusion of a stable status quoChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)0:37Why the treaty ratios felt unequalChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)2:44A 42,000-ton capital-ship ceilingNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)9:03Why a stronger ratio could reduce insecurityNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)14:31When impractical limits make evasion normalNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)17:46Replacement rules that keep shipyards workingChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)23:50Smaller battleships for French and Italian fleetsNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)37:13Why security matters to treaty enforcementChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)1:08:08A cap arms-control advocates could defendNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)1:35:49Credible limits and continued modernizationNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)1:47:12Continuous construction and equitable outcomesChapter
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)1:52:00How capital-ship limits spill into cruiser evasionNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)1:54:20A negotiating victory too complete to lastChapter
- Anglo Japanese War: If Tsingtao caused a war in January 1939 (Comment Response)21:52Why propose a 40,000-ton treaty limit?Q&A
- Anglo Japanese War: If Tsingtao caused a war in January 1939 (Comment Response)22:43Versailles, Washington, and the making of a world warNotable Point
- Anglo Japanese War: If Tsingtao caused a war in January 1939 (Comment Response)29:39What peace terms might Britain pursue with Japan?Q&A
- Anglo Japanese War: If Tsingtao caused a war in January 1939 (Comment Response)37:16A 10:10:7:4:4 treaty ratio for capital shipsQ&A
- Anglo-Japanese War Feb 39 - if Tsingtao incident blows up, what would be IJN doctrine? (Long Patrol)12:16Treaty limits and the appeal of big ships and big gunsNotable Point
- The 18in Gun HMS Agincourt and UAD video comment response (Long Patrol)8:21How 18-inch British ships could reshape naval treatiesNotable Point
- Patreon 48: Anglo-Japanese War in Feb 39 - if Tsingtao Incident goes "hot", what's IJN doctrine?1:16:00Could more realistic treaty limits reduce conflict?Q&A
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion0:44Making Hood the treaty benchmarkChapter
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion58:28The 35,000-ton limit lacked a clear ship benchmarkNotable Point
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion1:02:08Did negotiators know 35,000 tons meant compromise?Q&A
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion1:04:26Postwar anti-war politics behind naval limitationChapter
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion1:06:02Gun calibre sets a floor beneath treaty tonnageNotable Point
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion1:09:14The danger of unenforceable naval limitsNotable Point
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion1:12:22John Jordan's naval-treaty historiesNotable Point
- County Cruisers P5: Getting Proscriptive with Cruisers… London Naval Treaty of 1930 (Long Patrol)0:47Article 10 and the replacement clockChapter
- County Cruisers P5: Getting Proscriptive with Cruisers… London Naval Treaty of 1930 (Long Patrol)5:34Heavy-cruiser tonnage and over-age allowancesChapter
- County Cruisers P5: Getting Proscriptive with Cruisers… London Naval Treaty of 1930 (Long Patrol)8:10Treaty drawdown met Japan's withdrawalNotable Point
- County Cruisers P5: Getting Proscriptive with Cruisers… London Naval Treaty of 1930 (Long Patrol)12:06Defining cruisers and destroyers by displacement and gunsChapter
- County Cruisers P5: Getting Proscriptive with Cruisers… London Naval Treaty of 1930 (Long Patrol)29:00Washington and London treaties were not equivalentNotable Point
- Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney (Long Patrol)30:13Why treaty gun ceilings become design targetsChapter
- Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney (Long Patrol)38:41How the treaty defined capital ships and displacementNotable Point
- County Cruisers P1: The Kent Class (Long Patrol)11:43Washington Treaty rules beyond 10,000 tonsChapter
- County Cruisers P1: The Kent Class (Long Patrol)20:25Heavy cruisers as an evolved cruiser familyNotable Point
- County Cruisers P1: The Kent Class (Long Patrol)31:50Why arms-control bargains needed political winsNotable Point
- Youtube Vote 1: The 1905-1906 and the 1911 Morocco Crises26:46How giant Hood successors might change naval treatiesQ&A
- Inspiration of Theorists: The Maritime & Strategic Lessons of the Seven Years War (1756-63)2:17:31Q&A: extra Admirals at the Washington conferenceQ&A
- Inspiration of Theorists: The Maritime & Strategic Lessons of the Seven Years War (1756-63)2:20:21Q&A: fiscal choices shaped the Washington settlementQ&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…2:12:29What a later Washington Naval Treaty might have changedQ&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…3:13:18The Anglo-German agreement did not grant submarine parityNotable Point
- Patreon 34: Inter-war Naval Aircraft Development - what could have been?28:59Why carrier limits emerged through successive naval treatiesQ&A
- Crown Colony Class Cruisers27:53How the 1936 London Naval Treaty constrained cruiser designChapter
- Crown Colony Class Cruisers28:12What treaty standard displacement included and excludedNotable Point
- Crown Colony Class Cruisers30:09How the cruiser escalator clause could restore a 10,000-ton limitNotable Point
- Crown Colony Class Cruisers33:06What does 'high contracting parties' mean in treaty language?Q&A
- Crown Colony Class Cruisers36:27Parliament challenged cruiser scrapping and treaty interpretationNotable Point
- Crown Colony Class Cruisers2:47:02How treaty accounting could mislead naval intelligenceNotable Point
- Crown Colony Class Cruisers3:26:35Why Royal Navy designers left room for wartime growthNotable Point
- The Battles of Dogger Bank 1696-19163:19:38Beatty's mixed interwar policy legacyNotable Point
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response9:24G3 conversions and a larger treaty carrier normNotable Point
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes23:31Why Britain wanted more carrier tonnage but smaller individual carriersNotable Point
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:37:13Why the Revenge class survived while the G3s disappearedQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes2:29:46Could treaty construction quotas have preserved shipyard employment?Q&A
- Great White Fleet: Long Patrol Part 3 of 3 - Some Questions Answered20:45The Bull Moose Party's progressive platformQ&A
- Great White Fleet: Long Patrol Part 3 of 3 - Some Questions Answered24:30The Progressive platform joined democratic reform to naval arms limitsNotable Point
- For Random Books 18: Freidman's Royal Navy14:52Carrier limits depended on Japanese acceptanceNotable Point
- For Random Books 18: Freidman's Royal Navy15:37How treaty limits freeze today's design assumptionsNotable Point
- Steel of a Hundred Years Ago: Ships of 19201:20:32Treaty survival through an Incomparable carrier conversionQ&A
- Steel of a Hundred Years Ago: Ships of 19201:25:17How British conversions shaped carrier treaty limitsQ&A
- RN Paper Cruisers; the what might have beens…6:10Alaska frames the scale of Britain's paper-cruiser studiesChapter
- RN Paper Cruisers; the what might have beens…54:19Cancelling Surrey surrendered treaty leverageNotable Point
- RN Paper Cruisers; the what might have beens…1:06:40Battleship downsizing served Britain's cruiser prioritiesQ&A
- RN Paper Cruisers; the what might have beens…1:13:03The 14-inch King George V battery was a government choiceQ&A
- RN Paper Cruisers; the what might have beens…1:29:31How large might 1920s battleships have grown without treaties?Q&A
- RN Paper Cruisers; the what might have beens…1:32:30Super Town planning assumed treaty limits would fadeNotable Point
- RN Paper Cruisers; the what might have beens…1:36:24Public arms-race restraint did not end British cruiser planningQ&A
- 1940 Norway Campaign Part 1 of 5: Introduction16:52The Anglo-German Naval Agreement as arms control and intelligenceNotable Point
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 5 of 5/Articles 17-221:33Articles 17-18: cruiser transfers and US constructionChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 5 of 5/Articles 17-228:00Article 19: stopping a clean-slate rebuildChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 5 of 5/Articles 17-2213:43Japan's treaty politics and controlled naval spendingNotable Point
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 5 of 5/Articles 17-2215:43Article 21 and a naval build-up outside the treatyChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 5 of 5/Articles 17-2218:18The treaty held before late erosionNotable Point
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 5 of 5/Articles 17-2226:46Why wider interwar disarmament failedNotable Point
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 5 of 5/Articles 17-2236:38Why the 1936 treaty offered little restraintNotable Point
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 4 of 5/Articles 14-161:34How British complaints concealed treaty advantagesNotable Point
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 4 of 5/Articles 14-167:27How Articles 14-16 classified and limited fleetsChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 4 of 5/Articles 14-1612:11Britain's advantage within apparent parityNotable Point
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 4 of 5/Articles 14-1623:02Submarine parity and Britain's interest in abolishing the typeNotable Point
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 2 of 5/Articles 8-100:40Article 8's exempt-vessel rulesChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 2 of 5/Articles 8-102:43Why carriers were limited to six-inch gunsNotable Point
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 2 of 5/Articles 8-104:53The six-inch threshold and small-cruiser pressureNotable Point
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 2 of 5/Articles 8-106:03Treaty pressure and the super-destroyer raceChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 2 of 5/Articles 8-1015:30Article 9 and controlled fleet replacementChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 2 of 5/Articles 8-1017:58Article 10's notification and verification systemChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 2 of 5/Articles 8-1020:34Why treaty-era choices lasted into World War IINotable Point
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 1 of 5/Articles 1-71:13Why the 1930 treaty mattersChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 1 of 5/Articles 1-71:50Article 1: a capital-ship building holidayChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 1 of 5/Articles 1-73:23Article 2 trades old capital ships for lower costsChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 1 of 5/Articles 1-78:16Cruiser imbalances behind the negotiationsNotable Point
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 1 of 5/Articles 1-710:45Articles 3 and 4 define and arm small carriersChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 1 of 5/Articles 1-714:02Ryujo reveals the small-carrier loopholeNotable Point
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 1 of 5/Articles 1-716:54Article 5 standardises carrier gun limitsChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 1 of 5/Articles 1-719:52Article 6: measuring a warship without fuelChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 1 of 5/Articles 1-723:19Article 7 caps submarines but preserves exceptionsChapter
- The Leander Class Long Patrol - The Interwar 2nd Class Protected Cruiser?6:35The first generation of new 1930s light cruisersChapter
- An Introduction To Battle Cruisers8:18Global trade routes and Washington Treaty constraintsChapter
- An Introduction To Battle Cruisers11:03How treaty wording shaped refits and reconstructionNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 2a: Book Reviews/Q&A59:31Why a modern Washington Naval Treaty would struggleQ&A
- Back Pocket Cruisers Presentation (Practice 2)9:12Treaty limits made ship numbers the central problemChapter