Video

Check Campaign 18: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign

Study Check Campaign 18: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign, a Dr. Alex Clarke video from 19 May 2024, with 31 time notes. Topics include Battle Of Coronel, Battlecruisers…

Date
Runtime3:38:34
Guide points31 time notes

Time notes

  1. 3:47
    Destroyer and cruiser convoy attack

    An early convoy action shows destroyers and a cruiser using speed, torpedoes, and gunfire against merchant ships with little escort pressure.

    Notable Point
  2. 20:17
    Surface raiders need places to repair

    The convoy victory prompts a comparison between campaign raiders with worldwide repair access and German surface raiders constrained by scarce safe bases.

    Notable Point
  3. 23:02
    Heavy cruisers withdraw from a battleship

    A fight against a 90,000-ton fast battleship becomes a lesson in testing cruiser toughness without accepting an unwinnable slugging match.

    Notable Point
  4. 35:24
    Designing ships for battles or wars

    A design aside distinguishes a ship optimized to win each battle from a fleet built to win the wider war.

    Notable Point
  5. 41:50
    Communism, anarchism, and assumptions about human behavior

    A political aside argues that communism and anarchism depend on people assigning enough weight to other people's needs, which makes their theoretical appeal hard to realize in practice.

    Notable Point
  6. 44:23
    Why battleship rankings hide design tradeoffs

    A discussion of Iowa and Yamato shows why speed, gun power, classification, treaties, and infrastructure resist a simple best-battleship ranking.

    Notable Point
  7. 48:28
    QuestionIf Plan Z were completed and India became a dominion before war, could a Royal Indian Navy receive battleships to spread the cost of the imperial battle fleet?Answer

    Potentially, but only after years of building officers, crews, dockyard capacity, and experience with cruisers, destroyers, and sloops; Australia and perhaps New Zealand or Canada would probably receive capital ships first.

    Q&A
  8. 51:23
    Germany's interwar naval development gap

    A delayed-war counterfactual shows how Germany's long shipbuilding interruption and slower design cycle could leave Plan Z further behind rival navies rather than buying it time to catch up.

    Notable Point
  9. 58:03
    QuestionWould Germany have alarmed the Allies by moving directly from 11-inch to 16-inch battleship guns, and did Krupp still possess 15-inch tooling?Answer

    The Anglo-German Naval Agreement permitted 16-inch guns, Britain already operated Nelson and Rodney, and Versailles-era destruction forced Germany to rebuild 15-inch tooling before it could create 16-inch capacity.

    Q&A
  10. 1:02:31
    Engineering perfection as a procurement trap

    A technology-choice aside warns that chasing engineering perfection can keep naval equipment from ever reaching the fleet.

    Notable Point
  11. 1:13:58
    What HMS Dreadnought might change at Coronel

    An alternate Battle of Coronel considers whether HMS Dreadnought's presence would deter von Spee or trap his squadron against an opponent it could not outrun.

    Notable Point
  12. 1:18:36
    Port capacity, personnel, and submarine sea denial

    A fleet-management pause connects visible port capacity and personnel shortages to construction sequencing and the growing sea-denial effect of submarines.

    Notable Point
  13. 1:32:26
    Destroyer screens and sensible battery targets

    An errant destroyer screen and reversed gun targets expose the difference between fleet roles and the simulation's automatic behavior.

    Notable Point
  14. 1:34:38
    Long-range guns and the politics of modernization

    A one-sided long-range engagement becomes a lesson in why recognizing and funding obsolete naval guns can be as difficult as replacing them.

    Notable Point
  15. 1:40:02
    Should a sunken magazine still be burning?

    A fire continuing deep below the waterline prompts a realism check on magazine explosions, flooding, and the condition of a submerged wreck.

    Notable Point
  16. 1:49:38
    Mine losses depend on what remains at sea

    French warships suffer mine damage while British merchantmen remain exposed, showing how the traffic each side still operates shapes its loss categories.

    Notable Point
  17. 1:52:53
    Merchant cruisers and convoy-defense research

    A research review prioritizes merchant cruisers and single torpedo launchers for convoy defense while previewing improved destroyer hulls and submarine torpedoes.

    Notable Point
  18. 1:57:13
    Destroyer and submarine mass buildout

    A fleet-management pass weighs whether to finish destroyers or submarines first before moving back to battleship and minelaying-submarine construction.

    Notable Point
  19. 2:04:04
    Low-fuel destroyers and battle-line focus

    A late battle uses heavy cruisers and destroyers to isolate a French battleship despite low-fuel escort limitations.

    Notable Point
  20. 2:11:22
    Cruiser torpedo reserve and a task-group mistake

    A failed pursuit shows why heavy cruisers may need reserved torpedoes and why the right supporting ship must be detached at the start of an attack.

    Notable Point
  21. 2:22:46
    The survivability of a 90,000-ton battleship

    A battered French battleship keeps its speed and remains afloat under prolonged fire, prompting a close look at damage, scale, and watertight integrity.

    Notable Point
  22. 2:36:57
    Plunging fire and the point to abandon ship

    The final salvos expose the battleship's deck, followed by an argument that a captain should abandon or surrender a ship that can no longer fight.

    Notable Point
  23. 2:41:20
    Edward Seymour instead of Fisher in 1914

    An alternate leadership path asks whether Admiral Edward Seymour's seniority could prevent Fisher's 1914 return and change the Royal Navy's response to trade protection and submarines.

    Notable Point
  24. 2:48:12
    A thousand-submarine fleet goal

    Another hundred-submarine order reveals a campaign force-structure goal of roughly one thousand boats for global sea denial.

    Notable Point
  25. 2:49:58
    Modernizing the Revenge II battleships

    A Revenge II redesign balances 16.5-inch main guns, a larger six-inch battery, destroyer defense, speed, range, and weight distribution.

    Notable Point
  26. 2:57:34
    A complementary 18-inch-gun battleship

    A second battleship is designed to complement Jupiter with 18-inch guns, trading rate of fire and weight for heavier shells and different penetration performance.

    Notable Point
  27. 3:10:00
    Capital-ship weight, armor, and ballast tradeoffs

    The 18-inch design sheds thousands of tons while preserving armor, secondaries, torpedoes, speed, and stability, exposing the value of a dedicated ballast control.

    Notable Point
  28. 3:21:28
    A mixed heavy squadron for war with America

    Four ships of each new battleship design are paired into an 800,000-ton heavy squadron intended for a future war against the United States.

    Notable Point
  29. 3:24:24
    Mothballing old ships to crew new destroyers

    Older warships enter mothballs so their crews can commission new destroyers, showing personnel rather than hulls as the binding fleet constraint.

    Notable Point
  30. 3:32:03
    War Plan Red and the industrial-fleet balance

    A campaign comparison tests War Plan Red against population, budgets, ports, tonnage, crews, and the composition of the British and American fleets.

    Notable Point
  31. 3:35:40
    War Plan Red and two-ocean geography

    The American two-ocean problem becomes more severe when Britain surrounds the Panama Canal and controls the Caribbean approaches.

    Notable Point