Had Edward Seymour remained on the active list after 1910, he would have been a highly experienced and technically senior admiral of the fleet in 1914. That could make Seymour, rather than John Fisher, the officer recalled as First Sea Lord. The counterfactual then asks whether Fisher could displace him. A longer Seymour tenure could make deteriorating convoy, merchant-trade, or anti-submarine policy the condition for Fisher's return.
Notable Point · 2:41:20-2:43:03
Edward Seymour instead of Fisher in 1914
An alternate leadership path asks whether Admiral Edward Seymour's seniority could prevent Fisher's 1914 return and change the Royal Navy's response to trade protection and submarines.