Related time notes
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:58:55A British B-1 force and a smaller Army of the RhineNotable Point
- Bruships 265: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:07:09How long might four CVA-01 carriers have served?Q&A
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:12:15The Falklands War as an argument about deterrence costsNotable Point
- Bruships 259: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...34:28Four CVA-01 carriers and the Falklands counterfactualQ&A
- Bruships 259: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...37:47Could a naval Typhoon replace imported carrier aircraft?Q&A
- What if Britain joined with Australian & Canada to build a 'Maximum' Invincible Class instead?1:04CVA-01 cancellation and the advice reaching ministersNotable Point
- What if Britain joined with Australian & Canada to build a 'Maximum' Invincible Class instead?2:14Aircraft range versus persistent fleet air coverNotable Point
- What if Britain joined with Australian & Canada to build a 'Maximum' Invincible Class instead?5:43Cutting both carriers and their proposed alternativeNotable Point
- Guadalcanal, HMS Africa, Spy Ships, Metacentric Height & Cruiser build Ticonderoga: 5 in 1 Live2:00:29How another Falklands invasion date changes the carrier debateQ&A
- Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:26:40Preparing the Royal Navy for a known Falklands warQ&A
- Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:45:41Why a British Greyhound or Hawkeye program needs a carrier planQ&A
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:32:14CVA-01's likely service life and replacementQ&A
- Yak-38 Forger: The Nasty Surprise of the Kiev Class44:02A larger Kiev air group and a better Yak-38Notable Point
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...54:11Collective security did not erase Britain's own naval tasksChapter
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...1:06:21Type 42 added Sea Dart firepower to a larger task groupChapter
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...1:20:12What could a fleet built around Type 82 and CVA-01 have changed?Notable Point
- What Happens if Australia, Canada & the UK go all in on the Invincibles in the 1970s? (Patreon Live)9:19CVA-01 leaves a carrier-policy gapChapter
- Bruships 240: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:28:04Saving cancelled Cold War ship classesQ&A
- What if the Royal Navy used the Lessons of the 1982 Falklands War to go Stanflex?3:39Escort losses and the problem of arming auxiliaries for warNotable Point
- Bruships 234: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:42:36The Royal Navy's most consequential unbuilt designsQ&A
- Bruships 234: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:45:51Cancelled classes that would have changed later fleetsQ&A
- Bruships 234: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:01:15If Argentina had bought HMS Hermes in 1968Q&A
- Modern Chinese Destroyers: How the Current People's Liberation Army Navy's surface ships came to be1:29:46Type 055 presence and Type 052DL massChapter
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3rd Start18:36How building CVA-01 would change Britain's next carrier generationQ&A
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3rd Start21:02CVA-01, Falklands deterrence, and the case for nuclear propulsionNotable Point
- Bruships 225: Naval History & Current Affairs Questions Answered Live...3:36:47CVA-01's Sea Dart fit and the prospect of its later removalQ&A
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:23:08E-2 Hawkeye plans for CVA-01Q&A
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:48:21Why the Royal Navy retained the Fairey GannetQ&A
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:56:10The aviation escort cruisers planned around CVA-01Q&A
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age26:24Escort cruisers created a need for large destroyer leadersChapter
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:10:51Could a US Buccaneer purchase save CVA-01?Q&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...31:02CVA-01 construction as an industrial bridgeQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...37:33Did Britain's industrial transition require a severe shock?Q&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:14:28A Royal Navy for Atlantic lanes and Soviet bastionsQ&A
- Grumman A6 Intruder: Utilty Bomb Truck that gave Aircraft Carriers Reach, Punch & Flexibility46:36A joint Intruder-Buccaneer development counterfactualNotable Point
- Bruships 207: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:55:10British requirements in a Crusader III counterfactualQ&A
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:46:41Why postwar British carrier swaps do not alignQ&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:11:05Why a British CATOBAR fleet would not adopt the F-14Q&A
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:35:53Malta-class carriers sustain larger Royal Navy flight decksQ&A
- Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers26:17NBMR-3 prompted a wide field of British V/STOL designsChapter
- Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers28:11CVA-01 sat apart from Britain's V/STOL industrial strategyNotable Point
- Bruships 198: Naval History Questions Answered Live...50:56CVA-01's missile fit was not settledQ&A
- Bruships 198: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:02:38CVA-01's Sea Cat magazine still had layout choicesQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 11: from SDSR to Pearl Harbor, with a stop at CVA-01 along the way...6:09How historians can disagree over the same documentsNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 11: from SDSR to Pearl Harbor, with a stop at CVA-01 along the way...7:01Did Royal Navy manning shortages help cancel CVA-01?Q&A
- Scuttlebutt 11: from SDSR to Pearl Harbor, with a stop at CVA-01 along the way...51:14Why CVA-01 was likely to operate the E-2 HawkeyeQ&A
- Bruships 191: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:04:04From CVA-01 cancellation to the Invincible classQ&A
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...21:59A labour and industrial case for CVA-01Q&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...32:05Why a 1970s Leviathan refit becomes a new-ship argumentQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:59:14A 30,000-ton CVA-01 alternativeQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:01:11Could Japanese orders make CVA-01 affordable for Britain?Q&A
- Bruships 177: New Year, same Dr Alex... possibly with new gym membership48:02The political coalition the Royal Navy needed for CVA-01Q&A
- Bruships 177: New Year, same Dr Alex... possibly with new gym membership2:16:36The Falklands War without Sea HarriersQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?1:30:52CVA-01 was feasible until politics changedQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?2:58:41How far Invincible could grow after CVA-01Q&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?49:13When Royal Navy procurement last had real momentumQ&A
- Bruships 173: Christmas Books for the History Lover in your life...4:56:59Why a British carrier fleet would probably buy HawkeyeQ&A
- Bruships 172: So the Historiophon Happened...1:19:49Capability outweighed comfort in the Royal Navy's Hawkeye interestQ&A
- Bruships 172: So the Historiophon Happened...1:25:15CVA-01 could launch Tomcats but should not build around themQ&A
- Bruships 172: So the Historiophon Happened...1:28:12The Royal Navy's Hawkeye requirement disappeared with CVA-01Q&A
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...13:20CVA-01 and the politics of inter-service compromiseChapter
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...1:01:29Defence spending as national insuranceNotable Point
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/45:42:12CVA-01 as an alternative to the Invincible classQ&A
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/46:23:42Is Prince of Wales an unlucky Royal Navy name?Q&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/47:00:11A Royal Navy built for strategic autonomy after SuezQ&A
- Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax1:37:24Why fleet-carrier air groups organize around blocks of eighteenQ&A
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 12:25:26CV(A)-01 and the cost of abandoning a distinctive NATO roleNotable Point
- The Lessons of Never Built Carriers28:16CVA-01 as a pragmatic carrier for a global powerChapter
- The Lessons of Never Built Carriers58:41CVA-01 and capability without supercarrier sizeNotable Point
- Bruships 169: Kalax o Kalax, my kingdom for a Kalax...1:33:10Cold War destroyers make sense only inside their fleet doctrineQ&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song13:50A surviving CVA-01 fleet into the F-35 eraQ&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song25:05A Soviet Orel-class carrier could have preserved CVA-01Q&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song2:34:32Why most U.S. allies are unlikely to build modern strategic bombersQ&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song2:42:01How built CVA-01 carriers would alter a Soviet naval problemQ&A
- Bruships 167: Tell me why, everything turned book – packing up, stacking up is all kalax want to do.2:46:48What would replace Phantom and Buccaneer aboard CVA-01?Q&A
- Bruships 167: Tell me why, everything turned book – packing up, stacking up is all kalax want to do.2:53:41Why a naval Tornado would be a new aircraftQ&A
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....34:22Malta, Midway, and the later CVA-01 designQ&A
- Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat31:12A plausible CVA-01 air wing after the BuccaneerQ&A
- Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat1:50:51Four CVA-01 carriers into the twenty-first centuryQ&A
- Super Carriers & Specialists: The Aircraft Carrier Debate from WWII to present...43:40How Merlin's undercarriage reshaped carrier liftsNotable Point
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?37:53CVA-01 air groups with P.1154 and CL-84 descendantsQ&A
- Bruships 152: Patreon July Premiers Announcement, Special Guests & Naval History Questions Answered3:22:55A successful P.1154 would reshape, not save, CVA-01Q&A
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends38:28CVA-01 with P.1154 supersonic HarriersQ&A
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built1:28:37How building CVA-01 could have reshaped British shipbuildingQ&A
- Bruships 145: Naval History Questions Answered & Will it be lego building or book boxing?3:22:53Why CVA-01 was Britain's nuclear-carrier opportunityQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered48:21How four Audacious-class carriers change the Royal NavyQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered3:07:32The British path toward a supersonic HarrierQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!1:58:54A plausible CVA-01 air group from Buccaneer to Super HornetQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!2:29:22How completed Malta-class carriers delay CVA-01Q&A
- The HMS Ark Royals Saga: A History of Naval Aviation in a Name...44:49CVA-01 cancellation and the Harrier substituteChapter
- The HMS Ark Royals Saga: A History of Naval Aviation in a Name...50:02Carrier procurement shaped by changing politicsChapter
- The HMS Ark Royals Saga: A History of Naval Aviation in a Name...52:44CVA-01 commonality versus reinventing carrier capabilityNotable Point
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time3:25:13CVA-01, Invincible, and Fearless preserve a global Royal NavyQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time4:23:04Larger carriers would not make the Super Frelon a natural Royal Navy choiceQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:40:19Why Britain could not readily adopt the F-14AQ&A
- Who killed the Battleship? / Why no more battleships?25:26What a battleship could have done in the FalklandsNotable Point
- Bruships 130: Battleships26:54Why the Royal Navy did not simply want a ForrestalQ&A
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 40:22Why a benchmark navy is not a universal blueprintChapter
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 43:09Replacing Britain’s postwar carrier forceChapter
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 45:05What the CVA-01 carriers might have been namedNotable Point
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 46:50Type 82 as the carrier force’s missile-age escortNotable Point
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 47:42A 64,000-ton carrier below American supercarrier scaleNotable Point
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 48:48Why four carriers mattered for availabilityNotable Point
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 410:40Global ambitions, budget pressure, and a broken substituteChapter
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 415:07Designing for a continuous flying rhythmNotable Point
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 417:48Dimensions, machinery, range, and manningChapter
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 423:05An air group built around Phantom and BuccaneerNotable Point
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 425:35Reliable global capability without American scaleNotable Point
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 427:03Experimenting with an island-side aircraft routeNotable Point
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 429:11Leaving room for larger successor aircraftChapter
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 433:17Carrier design as command, sustainment, and deck managementNotable Point
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 437:34The operational case for a STOVL carrierNotable Point
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 439:15Designing a carrier system for a medium powerChapter
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 440:19Building availability through compatible flight decksNotable Point
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 441:49The lost force and the deterrence that is hard to seeNotable Point
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 443:39Judge warship design by national needsNotable Point
- Bruships 110: Naval Aviation20:10A French carrier fighter: prestige versus capabilityQ&A
- Alternate History - Royal Navy retains the Fleet 'units' of Royal Naval Air Service: Patreon 761:41:51Why later British carriers retained lifts near the centrelineQ&A
- Bruships 107: Some New to Me Books & Some New from Pen & Sword2:51:08The case for a nuclear CVA-01Q&A
- Bruships 103: Belfast Parts yet to arrive... so let's consider the Run up to War...3:17:59CVA-01 straddled two technology generationsQ&A
- Ship Design14:32Requirements-first design versus fixed constraintsNotable Point
- Bruships 100: Science Fiction & Some Fvourites1:43:06Using CVA-01 infrastructure to lock in a carrier programmeQ&A
- Bruships 97: Random Books, Naval Chat & Possibly the Sound of Rain19:46A Malta carrier force would leave Type 82 close to BristolQ&A
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat1:18:38CVA-01 was a practical carrier, not a remote paper studyQ&A
- Shortcomings of Early Aircraft Carriers: What Lessons can we Learn from Innovation?1:23:12Carrier designers keep relearning the cost of false economyChapter
- Shortcomings with the designs of 'Early' Aircraft Carriers: Patreon 652:58:35CVA-01 preserved an elaborate answer to deck trafficNotable Point
- Shortcomings with the designs of 'Early' Aircraft Carriers: Patreon 653:02:57Would CVA-01 need a specialized Phantom?Q&A
- Shortcomings with the designs of 'Early' Aircraft Carriers: Patreon 653:04:38Did CVA-01 predate the angled flight deck?Q&A
- Bruships 89: New Books (Christmas Recomendations) & Personal Accounts of War1:49:35Audacious and Malta classes formed the next carrier stepsQ&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History1:04:29Mixed signals and narrow force design invite the Falklands WarChapter
- Brooklyn Class(US Treaty Cruisers): Comment Response26:58How CVA-01 aircraft might have attacked Veinticinco de MayoQ&A
- French Navy Fights on in 1940: Comment Response Video44:07Why long counterfactual chains become fragileQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out2:16:22A starting book for CVA-01Q&A
- Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times3:00:52A nuclear CVA-01 pair from the 1970s to the 2010sQ&A
- Bruships 82: New Books, Fun Books & Random Books5:12Could CVA-01 operate the E-2 Hawkeye?Q&A
- Bruships 71: Hobbs on the Fleet Air Arm in Europe & Other cool books2:27:32How nuclear propulsion could change CVA-01 politicsQ&A
- Bruships 68: Random Naval History Books & Questions2:05:09If CVA-01 became a nuclear carrier classQ&A
- Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...47:00A plausible British carrier-aircraft path after CVA-01Q&A
- Patreon 36: Repair Ships, Depot Ships, Tenders and Stores Ships...1:49:19British defence spending and the NATO central frontNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)3:25:58A plausible succession for a surviving CVA-01 air wingQ&A
- Chiefs of Staff of the Axis Navies – Comment Response 4/42:49A Hawkeye answer to carrier early warningQ&A
- Patreon 33: Amphibious ship development from 1980's to modern day.3:05:48CVA-01's paper limits were not the final shipQ&A
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper1:35:38Carrier cancellation and the cost of CVA-01Chapter
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper2:08:37How Ark Royal could have bridged to CVA-01Notable Point
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper2:30:09How east-of-Suez framing shaped the carrier cutChapter
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper2:37:00Could a smaller carrier have survived the 1966 review?Q&A
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper2:41:42A possible CVA-01 and Invincible force mixQ&A
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper2:42:41CVA-01, airborne warning, and the FalklandsQ&A
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper2:49:51Why CVA-01 numbers depended on Britain's strategyNotable Point
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper2:58:45How long a CVA-01 fleet might have servedQ&A
- British Geostrategic Situation in the 1960s: The 1966 White Paper21:28CVA-01 and the cost of carrier aviationChapter
- British Geostrategic Situation in the 1960s: The 1966 White Paper25:20Civil-military friction over carrier cancellationNotable Point
- British Geostrategic Situation in the 1960s: The 1966 White Paper46:05Falklands signals and the CVA-01 counterfactualChapter
- Pseudo Patreon British Aircraft Carrier development Since 1945 (as suggested by Kyle Hardman)50:42The Hawker Siddeley P.139B carrier AEW conceptNotable Point
- Pseudo Patreon British Aircraft Carrier development Since 1945 (as suggested by Kyle Hardman)1:11:29Why Eric Brown did not become a rear admiralQ&A
- Pseudo Patreon British Aircraft Carrier development Since 1945 (as suggested by Kyle Hardman)2:13:01CVA-01 was planned as the center of a carrier-group systemChapter
- Pseudo Patreon British Aircraft Carrier development Since 1945 (as suggested by Kyle Hardman)2:18:24How many CVA-01 designs were considered?Q&A
- Pseudo Patreon British Aircraft Carrier development Since 1945 (as suggested by Kyle Hardman)2:18:41From CVA-01 cancellation to through-deck cruisersQ&A
- Four Random Books 31: The Conduct of War14:19A multi-author study of Royal Navy innovationChapter
- Four Random Books 31: The Conduct of War15:04CVA-01 missions and the carrier air-group problemChapter
- Four Random Books 31: The Conduct of War15:49Dockyards, displacement, and CVA-01's size ceilingNotable Point
- Four Random Books 31: The Conduct of War17:12How CVA-01 requirements drove size and cost upwardNotable Point
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P3b/7 Keith Speed (Continued)22:15From cancelled CVA-01 to the Invincible classChapter
- Bruships 28: New Books & Christmas Buys3:24:15Edinburgh, Duke of Edinburgh, and the likely CVA-01 nameNotable Point
- Part 1 of 4 "The effect of the early jet age on naval warfare strategy/tactics?"25:56Caspar John's influence on Buccaneer, CVA-01, and PhantomNotable Point
- Patreon 11: "The effect of the early jet age on naval warfare strategy/tactics?"37:00Carrier cancellation and industrial continuityQ&A
- Patreon 11: "The effect of the early jet age on naval warfare strategy/tactics?"42:22CVA-01 was more than an affordability questionQ&A
- Patreon 11: "The effect of the early jet age on naval warfare strategy/tactics?"55:22CVA-01 could have reshaped aircraft procurementNotable Point
- Patreon 11: "The effect of the early jet age on naval warfare strategy/tactics?"56:50Heavy bombers and carrier groups met different needsQ&A
- Patreon 11: "The effect of the early jet age on naval warfare strategy/tactics?"1:05:50CVA-01 was envisioned as a four-carrier programmeQ&A
- Patreon 11: "The effect of the early jet age on naval warfare strategy/tactics?"2:06:54Why the modern Royal Navy has fewer carriersQ&A
- Bruships 24 - An Autobiography from War1:30:09The fleet built around surviving CVA-01 carriersQ&A
- Bruships 24 - An Autobiography from War1:31:26Queen Elizabeth, Prince of Wales, and Ark Royal for CVA-01Q&A
- Bruships 24 - An Autobiography from War1:36:27A CVA-01 air group and airborne early warningQ&A
- Bruships 24 - An Autobiography from War1:51:58What was the Royal Navy's CVA-01 project?Q&A
- 4000 Subscribers Thankyou Special – The Royal Navy if I were Prime Minister3:05Interservice rivalry and the CVA-01 lessonNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 4: Naval Aviation Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:12:00CVA-01 could have reshaped British naval aviationQ&A
- Top 10 Ships – not Tribal, Battle, Daring or Town classes…2:02:35Aircraft choices for a surviving CVA-01 fleetQ&A
- Top 10 Ships – not Tribal, Battle, Daring or Town classes…2:15:26CVA-01 and the planned carrier replacement cycleNotable Point
- Introduction to Admirals, Engineers & Historians Part 118:25Caspar John's carrier career and CVA-01 politicsChapter