Notable Point · 25:20-29:23

Civil-military friction over carrier cancellation

Parliamentary exchanges around the carrier decision show the constitutional strain of public disagreement between ministers, the Admiralty Board, and the chiefs of staff.

Notes

Denis Healey's defence of the review led into a parliamentary dispute over making service advice public. Healey acknowledged the Admiralty Board's lack of assent while explaining why he had disclosed the positions of senior military advisers. Edward Heath described the First Sea Lord's resignation as a constitutional crisis and challenged the claim that defence had consumed a rising share of national output. He also disputed the idea that British sales would simply pay for American purchases: the F-111 would be bought on credit while British manufacturers were only allowed to tender, leaving a future government responsible for payment. Financial accounting, ministerial responsibility, and civil-military trust all collided in the exchange.