Related time notes
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:16:40A nuclear-powered K class and a T-class torpedo barrageNotable Point
- Bruships 264: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:11:21Nuclear shipyard capacity and alternative US fleet investmentsNotable Point
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:34:13A British battleship hull as the template for a nuclear cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:09:15A modern Iowa successor as a nuclear-powered strike and command shipQ&A
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:16:26A blank-cheque Royal Navy battlecruiser with nuclear power and VLSQ&A
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:40:00A mixed conventional and nuclear carrier fleetQ&A
- Guadalcanal, HMS Africa, Spy Ships, Metacentric Height & Cruiser build Ticonderoga: 5 in 1 Live2:44:32One cruiser design, two propulsion plantsNotable Point
- Guadalcanal, HMS Africa, Spy Ships, Metacentric Height & Cruiser build Ticonderoga: 5 in 1 Live3:33:46Would Long Beach-sized Aegis cruisers still be in service?Q&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:42:21Submarine tenders need economical conventional powerQ&A
- Bruships 254: Naval History Questions Answered Live28:34The impracticality of nuclear cargo submarinesQ&A
- Bruships 254: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:39:41Nuclear warships require industrial capacity beyond the hullQ&A
- Bruships 254: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:41:52The space and refit constraints on expanding a nuclear shipyardNotable Point
- Bruships 254: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:44:14What earlier nuclear certification providesNotable Point
- Bruships 254: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:50:55How nuclear refuelling experience could help a construction yardNotable Point
- Bruships 254: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:59:04What nuclear certification demands of a shipyardQ&A
- Bruships 254: Naval History Questions Answered Live4:45:03Armament for a hypothetical Canadian icebreaking cruiserNotable Point
- Why Can't Modern Russia Build Destroyers?6:35Why turbine shortages made a nuclear Lider plausibleNotable Point
- Why Can't Modern Russia Build Destroyers?7:56Why a Lider-class destroyer would be more than an escortNotable Point
- Why Can't Modern Russia Build Destroyers?24:52Large surface ships remain within Russia's technical reachNotable Point
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:47:11India's carrier program and global-power ambitionsQ&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:53:58Why carrier and submarine reactors are not interchangeableNotable Point
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:22:11Molten-salt and liquid-metal reactors are different naval technologiesQ&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:31:25Powering long-range uncrewed surface vesselsQ&A
- Bruships 247: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:39:35A Soviet carrier acquired in 1991 could redirect British naval aviationQ&A
- Bruships 246: Naval History Questions Answered Live...44:05One nuclear merchant ship will not unlock widespread port accessQ&A
- Bruships 246: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:44:06A 1970s Commonwealth battlecruiser would sell nuclear power and statusQ&A
- Bruships 246: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:57:57British nuclear-rated facilities extended beyond the submarine-building yardQ&A
- Bruships 246: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:34:07Reactor access should sit beneath spaces already due for renewalQ&A
- Bruships 246: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:36:43Fleet ambition ends where yards, money, and specialist labour run outQ&A
- Bruships 246: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:40:02Nuclear shipbuilding wages reflect scarce skills and civilian competitionNotable Point
- Bruships 246: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:50:13A modern battleship would be an enlarged missile destroyerNotable Point
- Bruships 245: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:36:29Could a nuclear carrier appear in 1946?Q&A
- Bruships 244: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:11:28Could a nuclear surface-combatant hull become a carrier?Q&A
- Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:07:02Balancing a 320-cell cruiserQ&A
- US Navy Ship Building Plan 2026... a Live look at what is being planned...13:14Nuclear shipyard capacity comes before nuclear fleet growthNotable Point
- US Navy Ship Building Plan 2026... a Live look at what is being planned...2:19:07Shipyard investment, private finance, and urgent availabilityChapter
- US Navy Ship Building Plan 2026... a Live look at what is being planned...2:25:42Why the proposed battleship emphasizes magazines, power, and commandChapter
- US Navy Ship Building Plan 2026... a Live look at what is being planned...2:33:08Nuclear baseload with gas turbines for peak electrical demandNotable Point
- US Navy Ship Building Plan 2026... a Live look at what is being planned...2:40:06Battleship presence and a distributed path to nuclear constructionNotable Point
- US Navy Ship Building Plan 2026... a Live look at what is being planned...4:26:03Could battleships use modified small modular reactors?Q&A
- US Navy Ship Building Plan 2026... a Live look at what is being planned...4:32:14Why might battleships initially cost more than carriers?Q&A
- US Navy Ship Building Plan 2026... a Live look at what is being planned...4:56:31Does the plan rely on future drop-in modular reactors?Q&A
- US Navy Ship Building Plan 2026... a Live look at what is being planned...5:26:16Newport News as a final assembly yard for carriers and battleshipsNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)1:15:07Nuclear escorts would change carrier support and port accessNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)2:07:26Nuclear-gas propulsion trades endurance for access limitsQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)2:19:48Splitting one class between propulsion systems weakens commonalityQ&A
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:46:51Port access and crew costs in nuclear merchant shippingNotable Point
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:21:16The best merchant ship for a nuclear-power demonstratorQ&A
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:55:21Oil shocks and naval energy costsQ&A
- Top/Bottom 5 inventions/adaptations of RN ships that came from the ships themselves...(Patreon Live)1:21:05Could battleships have combined steam and gas propulsion?Q&A
- Bruships 233: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:59:55A nuclear-powered SS Leonardo da VinciQ&A
- Bruships 233: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:19:37Could Canada field nuclear-powered surface combatants?Q&A
- If WWII is delayed, what do the Warships of the 1950s look like?1:08:13Diesel-electric progress continues without early nuclear boatsNotable Point
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...27:49A British counterpart to the Long Beach guided-missile cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3rd Start21:02CVA-01, Falklands deterrence, and the case for nuclear propulsionNotable Point
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:11:47When a medium power should choose a nuclear carrierQ&A
- How to go about Designing a Warship... and a Fleet!49:51A proposed nuclear base load with conventional surge powerNotable Point
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)1:28:00AUKUS includes uncrewed undersea developmentNotable Point
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)1:30:27UK geography favors nuclear submarines over SSKsNotable Point
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)2:32:03Gas turbines now, nuclear power for energy-heavy shipsQ&A
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)3:10:47Electrical demand and the threshold for nuclear powerQ&A
- Trumps Battleship; A Naval History view on what we know of the Defiant Class so far25:24Interpreting the early cost estimate and propulsion uncertaintyChapter
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle8:18:30What could justify four reactors in a surface warship?Q&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle8:19:15Would ejecting a reactor protect a damaged warship?Q&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon5:24Why reactor-circuit water was no place to make teaQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War1:44:27Why a future Russian carrier would favor nuclear powerQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War7:25:36The narrow case for a nuclear-powered escortQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida6:55:03How nuclear capital ships in 1938 would alter Japanese strategyQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida7:00:16Civilian nuclear propulsion and Russian icebreakersQ&A
- Bruships 219: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:35:33The response to Russian nuclear escorts depends on scaleQ&A
- Bruships 219: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:59:12A future Russian nuclear carrier battle groupQ&A
- Bruships 219: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:01:49British nuclear cruisers reshape the Commonwealth fleetQ&A
- Bruships 219: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:09:53China's twenty-submarine capacity is not annual outputQ&A
- What would the World's Major Navys look like in 1950 if WWII didn't happen? (Live)1:48:48Nuclear propulsion begins with carriers rather than submarinesNotable Point
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...30:57Nuclear reactors face a different risk at seaNotable Point
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:15:50Debating conventional carriers alongside US nuclear carriersQ&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:19:29Conventional submarines as an AUKUS complementNotable Point
- Bruships 217: Back from Japan 2025: Jetlag is a Myth - Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:42:17Why battle damage changes nuclear-reactor riskNotable Point
- Bruships 217: Back from Japan 2025: Jetlag is a Myth - Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:19:41Why a hospital ship rarely needs nuclear powerQ&A
- Bruships 217: Back from Japan 2025: Jetlag is a Myth - Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:27:10Why a warship cannot simply power a damaged cityQ&A
- Bruships 217: Back from Japan 2025: Jetlag is a Myth - Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:50:00Which navy might build the next battlecruiser?Q&A
- Bruships 217: Back from Japan 2025: Jetlag is a Myth - Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:51:11Nakhimov's long absence and decade of modernizationNotable Point
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...After Power Cut2:19:20A nuclear cruiser escort for every US carrierQ&A
- Bruships 210: Naval History Questions Answered Live...52:30A nuclear-cruiser program to sustain surface-reactor productionNotable Point
- Bruships 209: Science Fiction Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:43:39The uneasy case for a nuclear-powered battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:04:33A modern British cruiser based on Kirov's missionQ&A
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:39:59Nuclear propulsion in interwar British warshipsQ&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:17:41Why Russia might pair nuclear power with STOBAR aviationNotable Point
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:07:33Why nuclear power is not an easy answer for commercial shippingQ&A
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:02:29Why the Royal Navy has no nuclear-powered surface fleetQ&A
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:03:36Type 83 power choices and the shortage of shipyard capacityNotable Point
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:07:02Why a British reactor-generation lag is challengedQ&A
- Vice-Admiral Joshua Rowley: The Trials of Being the Solid Deputy for the Greats!9:15Could nuclear-powered merchant ships work?Q&A
- Bruships 191: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:06:26Why a nuclear Great Eastern would cease to be the same shipQ&A
- Leadership of the 1930 London Naval Treaty1:39:43Industrial capacity does not determine submarine purchasesNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!2:25:05A speculative 1960s super-capital ship as a prestige projectQ&A
- 21st Century Battleship: What would a battleship built today need to be a battleship?50:07Reactor tradeoffs and an armored command cocoonNotable Point
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...28:29How often the Royal Navy considered nuclear surface shipsQ&A
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:08:28British, Indian and Chinese carrier propulsion choicesNotable Point
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:10:45Why Queen Elizabeth-class carriers are conventionally poweredNotable Point
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:13:24French-funded nuclear certification at SouthamptonQ&A
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:16:43Comparing the smallest nuclear-powered surface shipsQ&A
- Bruships 183: Science Fiction/Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:29:14Coastal missile size and nuclear-powered amphibious shipsNotable Point
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:02:59Where nuclear propulsion fits an American escort fleetQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...59:56A Chinese heavy missile cruiser for global presenceQ&A
- Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...Part II2:45:52Why Britain did not build nuclear CATOBAR carriersQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?57:50Why nuclear merchant ships struggle economicallyQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?2:02:41Why dismantling nuclear submarines takes decadesQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?3:45:30Carrier size follows the air group and its enduranceNotable Point
- Glynn Stewart & Alex Discuss How Do You Create a Science Fiction Fleet? #2Historians ep 31:14:09A Canadian Arctic carrier tests capability against affordabilityNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 8: Beatty, Sopwith Cuckoos, Carriers & the Defence Debate...54:38Why nuclear submarines tend to be largeQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 8: Beatty, Sopwith Cuckoos, Carriers & the Defence Debate...55:48Why amphibious assault ships remain conventionally poweredNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 8: Beatty, Sopwith Cuckoos, Carriers & the Defence Debate...57:56How national nuclear infrastructure shapes ships and energy policyNotable Point
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...51:28The infrastructure cost of nuclear carrier propulsionNotable Point
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/41:50:00How long a completed Project Habakkuk might surviveQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!1:12:40Small modular reactors for high-power surface combatantsQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!1:19:29Why a civilian turbine-efficiency figure cannot settle a naval comparisonQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!4:19:03Complete carrier groups took priority over nuclear cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!4:24:00Tillman-style nuclear missile cruisers could trigger allied counterbuildingQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!4:26:48How small should a nuclear-powered escort be?Q&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song20:12Why a nuclear-powered Da Vinci liner faced a port-access problemQ&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song2:21:55What Britain would need to build a nuclear carrier or cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song2:25:23Why fusion propulsion would reach patrol vessels lateQ&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song2:45:21What nuclear propulsion would change in an interwar heavy cruiserQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 6: Responding to some History Hot Takes...38:25Reactor life within a nuclear carrier's service lifeQ&A
- Bruships 165: I saw a Poodle with a Kalax Manual in his hand, walking through the moors of cornwall1:38:52The Barracuda class as an interim diesel-electric submarineQ&A
- Bruships 165: I saw a Poodle with a Kalax Manual in his hand, walking through the moors of cornwall3:35:59Why more nuclear merchant ships would not solve acceptanceQ&A
- Bruships 165: I saw a Poodle with a Kalax Manual in his hand, walking through the moors of cornwall3:37:31From nuclear Aegis cruisers to a nuclear ZumwaltQ&A
- Bruships 165: I saw a Poodle with a Kalax Manual in his hand, walking through the moors of cornwall3:44:50Where could the two Enterprises be preserved?Q&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!1:31:47Could a late Nimitz-class carrier be refueled twice?Q&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!2:53:19A modern nuclear command cruiser from the Zumwalt designQ&A
- The Nimitz Class: The Tenacious Ten that underpin America on the Global Stage10:39The bulbous bow trades efficiency for speed and machinery lifeNotable Point
- The Nimitz Class: The Tenacious Ten that underpin America on the Global Stage20:16Survivability, speed, and the lost nuclear escort conceptChapter
- The Nimitz Class: The Tenacious Ten that underpin America on the Global Stage25:50Designing the ship around flexible sortie generationChapter
- The Nimitz Class: The Tenacious Ten that underpin America on the Global Stage38:02The scale and machinery behind a 100,000-ton carrierChapter
- The Nimitz Class: The Tenacious Ten that underpin America on the Global Stage43:20What the A4W designation reveals about reactor maturityNotable Point
- Japan's I-400 Class: Waste of Resources, Idea to Soon or Idea to late?1:19:21Does a modern aircraft carrier have to be nuclear-powered?Q&A
- Bruships 160: Money for Kallax, Book Space ain’t Free! Naval History Questions & Chat...59:31The limits of a modern British gun cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 160: Money for Kallax, Book Space ain’t Free! Naval History Questions & Chat...1:24:26Why nuclear-powered LHAs remain unlikelyQ&A
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!55:58A mixed nuclear and conventional US carrier fleetQ&A
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built35:36Powering a hypothetical modern battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built2:32:58Why nuclear Queen Elizabeth carriers would become CATOBAR shipsQ&A
- Bruships 145: Naval History Questions Answered & Will it be lego building or book boxing?3:22:53Why CVA-01 was Britain's nuclear-carrier opportunityQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered1:13:37What nuclear warships require in reserveQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered1:19:40Why cold-shutdown reactors still need a watchQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered1:30:35The training cost behind a nuclear navyNotable Point
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered2:10:41How automation changes modern battleship crewingQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!1:18:34Why hypersonic weapons may revive very large cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered45:22Using aircraft carriers for emergency shore powerQ&A
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History1:49:37Would nuclear power have prolonged British capital ships?Q&A
- USS Texas: Always Bigger in Spirit - KSS3 S2 Comment Response5:36Would a modern nuclear-powered battleship be practical?Q&A
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out1:20:00Redesigning the Kuznetsov class for long serviceQ&A
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out1:35:35Why Kirov received undersized reactorsQ&A
- Bruships 131: Battleships...7:32Small reactors and nuclear surface warshipsQ&A
- Bruships 131: Battleships...36:23The likely scale of a future Russian nuclear combatantQ&A
- Bruships 131: Battleships...1:15:45When power demand might revive very large combatantsQ&A
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare1:27:15Why nuclear-powered escorts may returnQ&A
- Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics58:43Why Scandinavian builders set a high icebreaker standardQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!2:03:30Why an Alaska-class ship could not remain original todayQ&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy1:39:36The difficult alternatives to bunker fuelQ&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy1:41:48The crew constraint on small marine reactorsNotable Point
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?42:35Why nuclear surface warships are not a simple submarine extensionQ&A
- US Nuclear Powered Cruisers: Comment Response10:15Why USS Enterprise still had a speed limitNotable Point
- US Nuclear Powered Cruisers: Comment Response17:00How the post-Cold War drawdown shed nuclear expertiseNotable Point
- US Nuclear Powered Cruisers: Comment Response32:02Congress and the Navy divide over nuclear surface shipsQ&A
- US Nuclear Powered Cruisers: Comment Response37:10Nuclear escorts still need a balanced task groupQ&A
- US Nuclear Powered Cruisers: Comment Response39:36Endurance, not just output, in nuclear warship powerQ&A
- Leahy Class(+Bainbridge Class): Comment Response1:23Nuclear escorts and carrier surge operationsQ&A
- Leahy Class(+Bainbridge Class): Comment Response11:16Designing a realistic nuclear destroyer leaderQ&A
- Leahy Class(+Bainbridge Class): Comment Response17:59Nuclear escort trade-offs in a carrier groupQ&A
- Leahy Class(+Bainbridge Class): Comment Response19:39Reactor-accident politics in carrier operationsQ&A
- Leahy Class(+Bainbridge Class): Comment Response20:48A nuclear escort as command and sensor shipNotable Point
- Bruships 111: Random Books of History3:16:18What a surviving nuclear surface fleet changesQ&A
- Empire Total War Twitch Stream 9(April 2023)1:21:17Why nuclear power is awkward in a battleshipQ&A
- Empire Total War Twitch Stream 9(April 2023)1:30:18A submarine escape module for a nuclear battleship?Q&A
- Bruships 107: Some New to Me Books & Some New from Pen & Sword1:50:48The nuclear Strike Cruiser Mark II conceptNotable Point
- Bruships 107: Some New to Me Books & Some New from Pen & Sword1:55:58How merchant reactors could widen naval nuclear accessQ&A
- Bruships 107: Some New to Me Books & Some New from Pen & Sword2:26:50A Nimitz carrier transported to 1941Q&A
- Bruships 107: Some New to Me Books & Some New from Pen & Sword2:51:08The case for a nuclear CVA-01Q&A
- Bruships 107: Some New to Me Books & Some New from Pen & Sword2:53:16A 1941 victory reshapes lives, budgets, and carrier developmentNotable Point
- Nuclear Power: Not All About Rickover0:01Naval nuclear power before the Cold WarChapter
- Nuclear Power: Not All About Rickover8:56Why a navy would choose nuclear propulsionChapter
- Nuclear Power: Not All About Rickover13:10People, logistics, and protection costsNotable Point
- Nuclear Power: Not All About Rickover16:13Why nuclear merchant ships remain rareNotable Point
- Nuclear Power: Not All About Rickover18:29Why pressurized-water reactors dominate at seaChapter
- Nuclear Power: Not All About Rickover36:51The strategic cost-benefit test for nuclear powerChapter
- Nuclear Power: Not All About Rickover38:30Education and public investment behind nuclear fleetsNotable Point
- Timberborne: A Test for the Year of Technology/My students favourite 'engineering game'55:39Enterprise as the proof of concept for the Nimitz classNotable Point
- The Submarine Century? How Submarines evolved over the 20th Century1:48:05The research and industrial foundations behind nuclear submarinesChapter
- Bruships 100: Science Fiction & Some Fvourites45:26A British nuclear cruiser built around Type 82Q&A
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers45:17The nuclear-powered strike cruiser conceptQ&A
- Bruships 92: New Books, Naval Chat and Late 19th Century Warships...3:07:07Could a nuclear aircraft carrier exceed 40 knots?Q&A
- Bruships 90: Books From the Road43:35A modern 42,000-ton combatant would demand nuclear power and a vast magazineQ&A
- 19th Century Cruisers: Comment Response Video 3 (Sfax - Geffion)18:49Active protection drives warship power demandQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 22:32:34Modular reactors and nuclear-powered shipsQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out59:16China's iterative aircraft-carrier developmentQ&A
- Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times2:07:44The political threshold for nuclear British carriersNotable Point
- Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times3:00:52A nuclear CVA-01 pair from the 1970s to the 2010sQ&A
- Bruships 82: New Books, Fun Books & Random Books1:08:02Could USS Enterprise reach 50 knots?Q&A
- Bruships 82: New Books, Fun Books & Random Books1:14:06Operating USS Enterprise's eight-reactor plantNotable Point
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today43:05Why USS Enterprise's eight reactors bothered Doug ClarkeQ&A
- Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack59:17Sketching a guided-missile battleshipQ&A
- Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack2:18:16A modern nuclear carrier in the wartime MediterraneanQ&A
- Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions1:28:17A nuclear cruiser as China's carrier stepping stoneQ&A
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?33:39Was Long Beach the last true U.S. cruiser?Q&A
- Bruships 80: Books From Travels34:19Fisher with nuclear propulsion and autoloading heavy gunsQ&A
- Bruships 75: Following the 614th Running the Gauntlet2:17:52Why a 1930s naval reactor was possible but unrealisticQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)3:13:03Why Britain might answer an American nuclear battlecruiserQ&A
- Battle of the Aegates (241BC)2:56:37Why choose coal over nuclear power for an ancient mission?Q&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World7:15When nuclear-powered warships first entered discussionQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World35:51The case for nuclear-powered cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World3:02:36A 1930s nuclear capital-ship counterfactualQ&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament2:44:25Kirov's nuclear endurance and independent cruiser roleQ&A
- Bruships 71: Hobbs on the Fleet Air Arm in Europe & Other cool books2:27:32How nuclear propulsion could change CVA-01 politicsQ&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru2:19:13What could propel a 500,000-ton battleship to 42 knotsQ&A
- Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...1:11:34A modern battleship built around power generation and missilesQ&A
- Bruships 61 - Ship Design; Sci-fi, Wooden & Steel, and some Naval History Questions4:26:45High-energy weapons expose the power-storage problemQ&A
- Bruships 60: Covid Jab, Bad Back & New Books1:41:56Small reactors and future warshipsQ&A
- 21 Christmas Books for 2021 - Bruships 59: Books & Naval History Chat59:28Enterprise carried an eight-reactor support burdenQ&A
- 21 Christmas Books for 2021 - Bruships 59: Books & Naval History Chat3:26:35Naval nuclear propulsion depends on fuel policyQ&A
- Trafalgar to Dreadnought: A Century in Fifteen Ships and Battles2:13:46How fast might Dreadnought be with modern propulsion?Q&A
- Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat2:27:35The Type 83 propulsion tradeoffQ&A
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper3:00:00A speculative successor to gas-turbine carrier propulsionQ&A
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions1:37:57Railgun batteries push warships toward nuclear powerQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out?3:18:49A nuclear-powered modern armored cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 44: Strategy2:46:51A nuclear carrier would still face a conventional logistics clockQ&A
- Bruships 28: New Books & Christmas Buys3:11:58Russian Project 22220 icebreakers and the boundary of a warshipNotable Point
- Town Class; big impact with a light footprint2:54:52A two-ocean fleet design for CanadaQ&A
- Bruships 26 - The Random Collection31:41Why nuclear submarines do not imply nuclear carriersQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 14: Special & Covert Operations Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:23:25Power and protection for a future railgun cruiserQ&A
- 50th Proper Live Stream - Bru Ships Episode 10: Naval Warfare Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A51:56How nuclear power could reshape a Queen Elizabeth-derived carrierQ&A
- 50th Proper Live Stream - Bru Ships Episode 10: Naval Warfare Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:05:08Adapting the Queen Elizabeth design for FranceQ&A
- 50th Proper Live Stream - Bru Ships Episode 10: Naval Warfare Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:08:53Why a mixed US carrier fleet is politically difficultQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 7: Warship Design Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:32:16Conventional carriers can still keep pace with task groupsQ&A
- Top 10 Ships – not Tribal, Battle, Daring or Town classes…56:02Nuclear propulsion as a global power demonstrationNotable Point
- Top 10 Ships – not Tribal, Battle, Daring or Town classes…1:34:36Why submarine reactors complicate surface shipsQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 1: Book Reviews/Q&A1:49:56Why two British carriers did not justify nuclear propulsionQ&A