Naval Historywith Dr. Alex

Q&A · 1:08:53-1:10:03

Why a mixed US carrier fleet is politically difficult

Cheaper conventional carriers might preserve hull numbers, but buying them could undermine the nuclear carriers required for the US Navy's preferred Pacific operations.

Aircraft CarriersNaval ProcurementNuclear PropulsionPacific StrategyUS Navy
Watch at this timeFull video guide
Question

Would a mix of nuclear and conventional carriers make the US Navy more capable?

Short answer

It could increase numbers, but the cheaper conventional option might displace nuclear carriers that the Navy considers essential for Pacific operations.

Notes

A mixed fleet of conventional and nuclear-powered carriers has obvious numerical appeal. The US Navy nevertheless depends on nuclear carriers for particular long-range Pacific missions. Once both types compete under the same carrier label, legislators may favour the cheaper hull and reduce the nuclear force instead of funding a balanced mix. This creates a procurement trap in which the affordable supplement can threaten the specialised capability it was meant to support.