Naval Historywith Dr. Alex

Topic

4.7-inch Guns

Also searchable as 4.7-inch Gun, 120 Millimeter Guns, 120 mm Guns, Four Point Seven Inch Guns, QF 4.7-inch Gun, QF 4.7-inch Guns.

Related time notes

  1. Kaibōkan: The Imperial Japanese Navy Corvettes of WWII
    8:08Shimushu's treaty-sized escort specificationNotable Point
  2. Kaibōkan: The Imperial Japanese Navy Corvettes of WWII
    35:05Available guns and the practical equipment of escortsNotable Point
  3. Kaibōkan: The Imperial Japanese Navy Corvettes of WWII
    46:19Type C's basic convoy escort specificationChapter
  4. Destroyer Leaders: Where did they come from and why?
    46:28Later leaders fulfil Swift's fast-leader ambitionChapter
  5. Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    14:20Twin naval guns, recoil and wartime firepowerQ&A
  6. Royal Navy Destroyers of WWI...
    57:53Modified W-class destroyers and Thornycroft's influenceChapter
  7. Royal Navy Destroyers of WWI...
    1:03:07Shakespeare-class leaders: command space and a fifth gunChapter
  8. Royal Navy Destroyers of WWI...
    1:08:59Admiralty flotilla leaders and their fighting layoutChapter
  9. Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    2:17:22Modernised 4.7-inch and 155 mm destroyer gunsQ&A
  10. What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII?
    34:33Why wartime destroyers weighted fire forwardNotable Point
  11. What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII?
    42:51Distributed shipyards and a design that came too lateChapter
  12. Air Defence At Sea: From Air Ships in 1906, to drones in 2026 and everything in between...
    47:14The expanding reach of interwar anti-aircraft gunsChapter
  13. Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2
    42:20Would an 18-inch gun make a useful anti-submarine mortar?Q&A
  14. Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2
    2:47:10Could Britain have built more Tribal-class destroyers?Q&A
  15. The Perils of Standardisation: Can Navy's Standardise too much? (Patreon Premier)
    1:39Royal Navy gun standardization created more variationChapter
  16. The Perils of Standardisation: Can Navy's Standardise too much? (Patreon Premier)
    2:12Why one gun calibre did not guarantee one fleet standardNotable Point
  17. Claiming Mare Nostrum; Italian Destroyer Design & Procurment of the 1920s & 30s
    9:52Leone-class scout cruisers as large destroyersChapter
  18. Claiming Mare Nostrum; Italian Destroyer Design & Procurment of the 1920s & 30s
    29:17Navigatori gunnery and machinery survivabilityNotable Point
  19. Claiming Mare Nostrum; Italian Destroyer Design & Procurment of the 1920s & 30s
    44:31Maestrale and Oriani: larger hulls with familiar armamentChapter
  20. Claiming Mare Nostrum; Italian Destroyer Design & Procurment of the 1920s & 30s
    48:25I-class and Tribal armament compared with Italian destroyersNotable Point
  21. Claiming Mare Nostrum; Italian Destroyer Design & Procurment of the 1920s & 30s
    1:00:00Soldati's gun battery and reported accuracy problemsChapter
  22. Claiming Mare Nostrum; Italian Destroyer Design & Procurment of the 1920s & 30s
    1:02:47Soldati star-shell guns and fifth-gun refitsNotable Point
  23. Claiming Mare Nostrum; Italian Destroyer Design & Procurment of the 1920s & 30s
    1:11:55A Leone-class counterfactual for Italian destroyer gunneryQ&A
  24. The Dutch Interwar Destroyer Debate
    22:45Admiral de Ruyter-class guns, speed, and enduranceNotable Point
  25. Bruships 238: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    45:05Base-bleed shells for Royal Navy destroyersQ&A
  26. Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:59:13Why the Royal Navy accumulated so many gun calibresQ&A
  27. Harnessing and Maintaining Thoughtful Aggression! Royal Navy Destroyers of the Interwar Years...
    28:13Why Amazon became the preferred prototypeChapter
  28. Harnessing and Maintaining Thoughtful Aggression! Royal Navy Destroyers of the Interwar Years...
    56:04Alphabet classes grow around the torpedo attackChapter
  29. Harnessing and Maintaining Thoughtful Aggression! Royal Navy Destroyers of the Interwar Years...
    1:07:34I-class destroyers add endurance and supporting weaponsNotable Point
  30. Harnessing and Maintaining Thoughtful Aggression! Royal Navy Destroyers of the Interwar Years...
    1:24:05What an early twin 4.7-inch mount might changeNotable Point
  31. Scuttlebutt 18: Guns & Points of Order
    1:49Why the Royal Navy fielded so many gun calibresQ&A
  32. More Lessons of Never Built Carriers
    10:18The Royal Navy's unrealized 1931 carrier studyChapter
  33. Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II
    2:13:13Why British 4.7-inch guns did not all use the same ammunitionNotable Point
  34. Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II
    2:27:31Swedish naval guns reused in army fortificationsNotable Point
  35. Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II
    2:49:39Why Britain's preferred dual-purpose guns still complicated supplyNotable Point
  36. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    32:29Swedish 120 mm guns for medium and neutral naviesChapter
  37. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    35:51How Swedish ships divided surface and air targetsNotable Point
  38. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    38:30The 4.7-inch gun and British destroyer tacticsChapter
  39. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    48:22The missed high-angle future of the British 4.7-inchNotable Point
  40. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    52:58How Ansaldo and OTO competed over Italy's 120 mm gunsNotable Point
  41. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    56:23Italy's 120 mm choice: velocity over rate of fireChapter
  42. Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why
    1:02:01Dutch Bofors guns for East Indies operationsChapter
  43. Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    5:33:17A 1919 cruiser's secondary guns and destroyer developmentNotable Point
  44. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    3:25Royal Navy gun diversity reflected changing prioritiesNotable Point
  45. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    4:52How abundant funding could delay gun standardizationNotable Point
  46. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    10:104.7-inch and 4.5-inch performance depended on the mountChapter
  47. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    15:15A hybrid mount could make the 4.5-inch gun practicalChapter
  48. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    30:32Fleet standardization changes weapons available to escortsNotable Point
  49. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    37:11Narvik and Gurkha show the tactical value of high elevationChapter
  50. What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?
    45:32Operation Substance tests the fleet-wide air-defense effectChapter
  51. Pom-Pom or Bofors: Which 40mm do you want?
    54:09Norway exposes the demands of fleet air defenseChapter
  52. Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?
    20:37A possible 4.7-inch armament for an earlier AA cruiserNotable Point
  53. Dalrymple Hamilton: The Captain of HMS Rodney who believed she could be a destroyer
    1:12:47Storm, bomb, and dockyard work strengthened RodneyNotable Point
  54. Battle of the Barents Sea: Naval History Live
    1:59:24Why heavier German destroyer guns reduced practical firepowerNotable Point
  55. Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/4
    8:09:18Upper-deck Tribal mounts and the Battle class's alternativeQ&A
  56. Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax
    1:35:08Why Britain preferred 4.5-inch to 4.7-inch dual-purpose gunsQ&A
  57. Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax
    4:38:53Why twin 6-inch guns were possible but awkward on early Town cruisersQ&A
  58. Scuttlebutt 5: Some Tremendous Questions & Frustrations!
    43:20Why Royal Navy anti-aircraft standardisation laggedQ&A
  59. Check Campaign 26: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign
    47:04Why choose a 5.5-inch gun over a 6-inch gun?Q&A
  60. Scuttlebutt 2: H Class Battleships, Japanese Carrier Aircraft Design and lots more
    1:37:09When exercises validate the wrong design choicesNotable Point
  61. Patreon 103: The Nightmare returns - 4 WWI Town class are discovered by the Royal Navy in 1938
    50:11Why not fit 4.5-inch guns?Q&A
  62. Patreon 103: The Nightmare returns - 4 WWI Town class are discovered by the Royal Navy in 1938
    55:27Arranging the rebuilt Town's guns and funnelsNotable Point
  63. Patreon 103: The Nightmare returns - 4 WWI Town class are discovered by the Royal Navy in 1938
    57:32Reusing the six-inch ammunition magazinesNotable Point
  64. Patreon 103: The Nightmare returns - 4 WWI Town class are discovered by the Royal Navy in 1938
    1:16:06Why use four-inch guns instead of developing the mounting?Q&A
  65. Patreon 103: The Nightmare returns - 4 WWI Town class are discovered by the Royal Navy in 1938
    1:37:24Testing the conversion's air defence in NorwayChapter
  66. Patreon 103: The Nightmare returns - 4 WWI Town class are discovered by the Royal Navy in 1938
    1:54:00Could the four-inch Didos receive 4.7-inch mounts?Q&A
  67. Patreon 103: The Nightmare returns - 4 WWI Town class are discovered by the Royal Navy in 1938
    2:37:43Revising the cruiser around six twin 4.7-inch mountsNotable Point
  68. Patreon 103: The Nightmare returns - 4 WWI Town class are discovered by the Royal Navy in 1938
    2:54:32Why six-inch guns do not suit a Tribal hullQ&A
  69. Aircraft Carriers in Science Fiction
    4:19:19Could old Town-class cruisers become enlarged destroyers?Q&A
  70. Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!
    3:24:08What a 2,000-ton treaty destroyer could carryQ&A
  71. Check Campaign 3: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign
    25:15Could Britain have chosen a better dual-purpose gun route?Q&A
  72. The Philosophy behind Autoloader Development for Navies
    12:30Cartridge ammunition makes quick firing practicalChapter
  73. Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!
    3:06:02British choices for a larger destroyer gunQ&A
  74. HMS Princess Beatrix & HMS Queen Emma Landing Ship Infantry(Medium) - When Dutch Ferries go to War
    39:58Mixed-purpose destroyer guns covered Claymore's risksNotable Point
  75. What Happens If Whittle is supported & Britain develops Jet Engines + Gas Turbines in 1930s
    41:52Lighter machinery could preserve the original Tribal dual-purpose turretNotable Point
  76. What Happens If Whittle is supported & Britain develops Jet Engines + Gas Turbines in 1930s
    55:25Gas turbines could make Abdiel a faster, more heavily armed minelayerNotable Point
  77. Patreon 92: Frank Whittle is given consistent funding by Britain to develop jet engines from 1928
    1:08:21Machinery savings unlock dual-purpose destroyer gunsNotable Point
  78. Patreon 92: Frank Whittle is given consistent funding by Britain to develop jet engines from 1928
    1:33:52Six parallel gun calibres expose a procurement problemNotable Point
  79. Patreon 91: Flower class sloops: The most key ship of the 20th century?
    1:11:38Judge a sloop by its mission, not first-rate statusChapter
  80. The Royal Navys Response to a 1906 Dante Alighieri
    2:42Reconstructing Dante Alighieri's designChapter
  81. Landing Ship Tanks Mk1s: The First Attempts to Get Troops Ashore - Key Ships Series 7 Ship 3
    31:48Destroyer anti-aircraft exercises conceal a wartime flawNotable Point
  82. Dante Alighieri: Not Dreadnought but still an Inferno - Key Ships Series 7, Ship 1
    12:10Dante Alighieri versus HMS DreadnoughtChapter
  83. Dante Alighieri: Not Dreadnought but still an Inferno - Key Ships Series 7, Ship 1
    19:38Italy's place in the qualitative dreadnought raceNotable Point
  84. A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 7
    2:11:37Gun calibre should change turret scaleNotable Point
  85. Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?
    28:48Why the 4.7-inch dual-purpose mount was not the biggest treaty mistakeQ&A
  86. Testing out Lion Class & Potential Lion Class Successors on UAD
    1:40:42Reconstructing a Tribal-class destroyer exposes more game limitsNotable Point
  87. Testing out Lion Class & Potential Lion Class Successors on UAD
    1:49:09Why game destroyer range can misrepresent historyNotable Point
  88. HMCS Haida Comment Response
    28:24What if Tribal destroyers had met Graf Spee?Notable Point
  89. The Shipwreck Museum - The Destroyer Models #NavHistAus 2
    0:59Mixed gun batteries divide surface and air-defence rolesNotable Point
  90. Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done
    43:56K3 as an enlarged Renown designNotable Point
  91. Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done
    1:31:39Lyon secondary guns and horizontal protectionNotable Point
  92. HMS Dreadnought, but built around the RN's favourite battleship guns...
    2:28:58The super-battleship's layers of gun rangeNotable Point
  93. HMS Dreadnought, but built around the RN's favourite battleship guns...
    2:51:35Destroyer armament and the reach of heavy secondary gunsNotable Point
  94. Starting with Building HMS Thunderchild...
    2:51:19Recognising national destroyer design in a simulationNotable Point
  95. Alternate History - Royal Navy retains the Fleet 'units' of Royal Naval Air Service: Patreon 76
    2:03:12Carrier experience drives better destroyer air defenceNotable Point
  96. Christmas Comment Response: HMCS Sackville, Descartes & some 60s shorts
    1:394.7-inch dual-purpose mount tradeoffsQ&A
  97. Christmas Comment Response: HMCS Sackville, Descartes & some 60s shorts
    21:55Tribals, Crown Colonies, and 4.7-inch commonalityQ&A
  98. Christmas Comment Response: HMCS Sackville, Descartes & some 60s shorts
    26:35Twin 4.7-inch mounts on War Emergency destroyersQ&A
  99. Christmas Comment Response: HMCS Sackville, Descartes & some 60s shorts
    27:23Practical 4.7-inch versus 4.5-inch rates of fireQ&A
  100. Christmas Comment Response: HMCS Sackville, Descartes & some 60s shorts
    1:01:07Crown Colony 4.7-inch weight tradeoffNotable Point
  101. Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-65
    1:21Mark 37 comparisons need the gun-system contextQ&A
  102. Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-65
    3:24A standard AA gun still faced fire-control production limitsQ&A
  103. Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-65
    48:50Existing 4.7-inch weapons exposed a missed opportunityNotable Point
  104. Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-65
    49:19Gun standardization still has legacy limitsQ&A
  105. Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-65
    51:22Universal dual-purpose guns needed usable mountsNotable Point
  106. Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-65
    55:59Dual-purpose 4.7-inch guns and escort survivalQ&A
  107. Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-65
    1:01:51Treaty weight constrained enclosed Tribal-class mountsQ&A
  108. Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-65
    1:13:10Japanese gun standardization could only narrow the gapQ&A
  109. Top 5 Inventions that came too Late
    14:25Dual-purpose guns before Norway and the MediterraneanChapter
  110. Bruships 95: Science Fiction, Including Paddle 'Corn Oil' (Aka BioDiesel) Battleship Twist...
    22:03Dual-purpose guns and the limits of improving ABDACOMQ&A
  111. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    0:00Choosing the 4.7-inch 45-calibre starting pointChapter
  112. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    5:39How the failed five-inch project split British gun developmentNotable Point
  113. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    9:06Mount geometry, stability, and an experienced gun workforceNotable Point
  114. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    12:26The performance case for a high-angle 4.7-inch gunChapter
  115. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    19:07Capital ships and carriers join the common-gun fleetChapter
  116. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    21:41C-class anti-aircraft cruisers keep a surface punchChapter
  117. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    27:06An Abdiel-class minelayer with six 4.7-inch gunsNotable Point
  118. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    34:02Tribal destroyers against Norway's dive bombersChapter
  119. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    40:01Heavy anti-aircraft fire breaks up an attackNotable Point
  120. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    41:45An existing 4.5-inch plan makes mass conversion credibleNotable Point
  121. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    46:06A common calibre makes wartime supply more resilientChapter
  122. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    48:54Tribals and C-class cruisers reinforce the MediterraneanNotable Point
  123. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    52:18Escort conversions and Operation ClaymoreChapter
  124. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    56:12Better fleet air defence invites a German countermeasureNotable Point
  125. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    57:52Repulse trades two specialist batteries for one common fitNotable Point
  126. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    59:19Force Z remains a contingent outcomeChapter
  127. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    1:03:12Redirecting 4.5-inch investment into the common gunNotable Point
  128. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    1:05:26Why the Royal Navy kept specialist gun solutionsNotable Point
  129. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    1:07:22Damage instead of loss is a long-war advantageNotable Point
  130. What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?
    1:10:41A feasible mount opens a 50-calibre follow-onNotable Point
  131. Comus(1878) Class: Protected Corvettes/Third Class Cruisers
    38:29HMS Inflexible as a benchmark for changing weaponsNotable Point
  132. Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 2
    2:33:36Why the Royal Navy adopted a 120 mm gunQ&A
  133. Esmeralda(1883): 19th Century Cruisers p7
    15:24Japanese rearmament turns Esmeralda into IzumiNotable Point
  134. Major Allied Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 1939
    49:53Removing radar, turbine, and gun-production bottlenecksNotable Point
  135. Bruships 82: New Books, Fun Books & Random Books
    2:43:45Effective gun ranges for cruisers and destroyersQ&A
  136. Torpedoes and their Ships 1900-39: Patreon 54 (Long Patrol)
    36:32Night attacks, Long Lance, and the supply problemChapter
  137. County Cruisers P7: The Canaris Class (Long Patrol)
    6:41Speed, armament, and thin armour in Spain's County derivativeChapter
  138. County Cruisers P7: The Canaris Class (Long Patrol)
    39:24Why destroyer guns threatened the two-inch beltNotable Point
  139. 1939 Destroyer Doctrine: Patreon 50 (Long Patrol)
    7:08Technology and exercises can mislead doctrineNotable Point
  140. 1939 Destroyer Doctrine: Patreon 50 (Long Patrol)
    56:33Royal Navy destroyers for global commitmentsChapter
  141. Patreon 50: 1939 Destroyer Doctrine of the combatant navies & Where did it come from?
    47:21Why German destroyer guns were weak dual-purpose weaponsQ&A
  142. What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)
    17:33Weight savings in the secondary battery and conning towerNotable Point
  143. What a the choice of Secondary gun calibre tells us: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)
    8:48Rate of fire against destroyers and torpedo boatsNotable Point
  144. What a the choice of Secondary gun calibre tells us: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)
    25:34G3's layered gun and torpedo batteryNotable Point
  145. Adventure (1904) Class: Scout Cruisers (Long Patrol)
    46:15Brazil's Bahia class: turbines reshape the scout cruiserChapter
  146. Patreon 33: Amphibious ship development from 1980's to modern day.
    3:50:41Rate of fire matters in a Tribal-Fletcher gun comparisonQ&A
  147. Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 4/11 What Dreadnought Obscures
    2:31Minas Geraes: armour and turret layoutNotable Point
  148. Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 2/11 1890s Battleships
    5:30Oden class: compact coastal battle powerChapter
  149. Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 2/11 1890s Battleships
    8:20Oden's guns and the torpedo-boat problemNotable Point
  150. Cruiser Submarine: Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas Badly Done p5/7
    4:20A cruiser submarine's odds against escort gunsChapter
  151. William Agnew: Patreon 21, Notable Commanders, Long Patrol Part 3
    15:03Force K's night attack on the Duisburg convoyChapter
  152. Battles of Dogger Bank: Long Patrol P5/6 1916
    3:48Why the Arabis-class sloops were vulnerableChapter
  153. Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response
    41:15G3 design lessons and carrier-conversion potentialNotable Point
  154. For Random Books 18: Freidman's Royal Navy
    2:17Why a postwar multi-role destroyer became too largeNotable Point
  155. Naval Defence Act of 1889 Long Patrol Part 3: Ships
    21:27Centurion combines cruising endurance with a dense secondary batteryNotable Point
  156. Naval Defence Act of 1889 Long Patrol Part 3: Ships
    35:49Pearl-class cruisers for worldwide policingChapter
  157. Town Class Part 2 of 7: Contruction
    35:36Gun-cycle averages behind cruiser procurementChapter
  158. Town Class Part 2 of 7: Contruction
    39:25Why shell volume mattered with long flight timesNotable Point
  159. Four Random Books 12: Destroyers II
    12:41Cossack plans reveal Tribal-class design trade-offsChapter
  160. Four Random Books 12: Destroyers II
    15:59The Tribal class and interwar air-defence thinkingNotable Point
  161. The Ships that Fisher scrapped… suggested by Geoff Grognard
    2:05:27The Pearl class as a compact overseas presence cruiserChapter
  162. 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 2 of 5/Articles 8-10
    4:53The six-inch threshold and small-cruiser pressureNotable Point
  163. Flower Class Shorts no 3: HMAS Geranium
    1:47Geranium's larger Australian crew and gun fitNotable Point
  164. P2 Introduction to Pre-Tribal Class Destroyers of the RN
    5:58E and F classes: a standard destroyer fitNotable Point
  165. P2 Introduction to Pre-Tribal Class Destroyers of the RN
    9:48G- and H-class leaders: Grenville and HardyChapter
  166. P2 Introduction to Pre-Tribal Class Destroyers of the RN
    15:06Brazilian H-class orders and HMS InglefieldNotable Point
  167. P1 Introduction to Pre-Tribal Class Destroyers of the RN (special guest; Fluffy Research Assistant)
    6:10HMS Ambuscade as a 1924 destroyer testbedNotable Point
  168. P1 Introduction to Pre-Tribal Class Destroyers of the RN (special guest; Fluffy Research Assistant)
    9:05HMS Amazon and the prototype leader ideaChapter
  169. P1 Introduction to Pre-Tribal Class Destroyers of the RN (special guest; Fluffy Research Assistant)
    12:40HMS Codrington and the A-class leaderChapter
  170. P1 Introduction to Pre-Tribal Class Destroyers of the RN (special guest; Fluffy Research Assistant)
    16:22HMS Keith and the B-class size dilemmaNotable Point
  171. An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 1: Tribal Class (+Admiral Henderson)
    18:39The gun-mount compromise behind the Tribal classNotable Point
  172. An Introduction to Not the Big Ships: NGFS As Provided by Destroyers & Below Part 1 of 2
    16:36China Station anti-piracy operations adapt beyond destroyersChapter
  173. An Introduction to What was paid for in Blood, in Sweat, in Tears & so much Money... Part 3 of 3
    17:25Exercise incentives concealed air-defence weaknessesChapter
  174. An Introduction to My Top 10 Warships (No Tribal, Battle, Daring or Town Classes allowed)
    4:25HMS Meteor and the M-class destroyersNotable Point
  175. The Battles of Narvik (Norway 80)
    2:51Four Tribal-class destroyers change the oddsNotable Point
  176. T he Altmark 80 Videos in Full
    20:16Why Tribal-class destroyers were built to fightChapter
  177. Tribal Class in 60s (Combined)
    3:05Gun-heavy layout and advanced fire controlNotable Point
  178. Back Pocket Cruisers Presentation (Practice 2)
    10:52Why the Tribal class looked like back-pocket cruisersChapter