Naval Historywith Dr. Alex

Topic

Iowa Class Battleships

Also searchable as Iowa Class.

Related time notes

  1. Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    3:24:38Why retain and modernise the Alaskas?Q&A
  2. Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    3:29:58The Royal Navy's answer to a modernised IowaQ&A
  3. Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:06:00Iowa modernisation into the 2000s and the problem of Aegis beside 16-inch gunsQ&A
  4. Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:07:13Iowa's missile cells and a command role supported by escortsQ&A
  5. Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:09:15A modern Iowa successor as a nuclear-powered strike and command shipQ&A
  6. Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:29:36Which modern Western warships still have armour?Q&A
  7. Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:34:10Yamato battleships at TrafalgarQ&A
  8. Bruships 259: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:14:01Why an Iowa power plant would not make a fast Formula 1 carQ&A
  9. Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live
    1:48:12Checking a 3,500-ton claim for Hood's conning towerQ&A
  10. Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:26:33Iowas for every First World War fleet create a race to strike portsQ&A
  11. Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:28:34Would Tomahawk navigation work without GPS?Q&A
  12. Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:22:45Why the Iowa counterfactual uses an approximate British fleet countNotable Point
  13. America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class
    12:37Why the historical Alaskas arrived too lateChapter
  14. America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class
    18:54The cost of a bespoke large cruiserChapter
  15. America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class
    23:40A cruiser made redundant by the 1944 fleetNotable Point
  16. What happens if WWII took place as scheduled... after 1942? (Patreon)
    3:21:51A combined Allied battle line changes the Yamato comparisonNotable Point
  17. Why France bought Japanese Destroyers in WWI?
    9:15Why defence planning needs an insurance policyNotable Point
  18. Bruships 253: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    35:21Real US warships behind an Azur Lane anniversary wish listQ&A
  19. Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    45:02How long could the Iowa class have remained active?Q&A
  20. WWI delayed by six years? What would the Navies look like? (Patreon Alternate History)
    1:15:19Could a fast battleship with nine 16-inch guns appear by 1920?Q&A
  21. Trials and Tribulations: Why Testing Warships Matters...
    48:39Iowa gun shock and missile fitsNotable Point
  22. Bruships 238: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:26:04Panama Canal limits and US battleship hullsQ&A
  23. Bruships 236: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    58:40Iowa reload rates and gun-loading mechanicsQ&A
  24. If WWII is delayed, what do the Warships of the 1950s look like?
    47:37Avoiding war also removes the postwar frozen decadeNotable Point
  25. Bruships 227: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:32:15An unrestricted fleet for retaking the FalklandsQ&A
  26. Bruships 225: Naval History & Current Affairs Questions Answered Live...
    22:22Boiler crews once judged combustion by watching the funnelsNotable Point
  27. Trumps Battleship; A Naval History view on what we know of the Defiant Class so far
    10:04Iowa-class design for task-group warfareChapter
  28. Trumps Battleship; A Naval History view on what we know of the Defiant Class so far
    11:36Fast battleships and the protection spectrumChapter
  29. Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:29:59Designing an R-class counterpart to the Iowa classQ&A
  30. Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:26:21Slip rings connecting a rotating turret to its shipNotable Point
  31. Scuttlebutt 13: Questions on Battleships
    1:42Why G3 and Iowa belong in different categoriesQ&A
  32. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle
    4:17:02How Iowa's inclined belt fits a distributed armour systemQ&A
  33. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle
    4:51:43An Italian Iowa rebuild and the treatment of senior officersQ&A
  34. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle
    4:58:22Could the earlier Iowas receive the later torpedo-defence arrangement?Q&A
  35. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…
    1:55:38An upgraded Iowa against a First World War fleetQ&A
  36. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…
    7:36:03The Lion class as Britain's Iowa equivalentQ&A
  37. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…
    7:37:26Iowa, Hood, and Tiger: applying ship labels consistentlyQ&A
  38. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…
    7:40:02Panama Canal limits versus British heavy-weather requirementsQ&A
  39. Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust
    10:51:38Amphibious fire support in the American large-gun debateNotable Point
  40. Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress
    10:51:19Why a smaller gun need not produce a much smaller turretQ&A
  41. Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress
    11:30:19How credible A-150 intelligence could reshape Allied buildingQ&A
  42. Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress
    11:37:49Iowa-class ships under attack at Pearl HarborQ&A
  43. Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress
    11:39:21Larger battleships still need crews for damage controlNotable Point
  44. Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress
    11:41:13Repairing hypothetical Iowa-class casualtiesNotable Point
  45. Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress
    11:47:11An Iowa in Hood's place at Denmark StraitQ&A
  46. Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress
    11:48:41Maximum gun range is not effective battle rangeNotable Point
  47. Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress
    11:51:14Iowa's turret elevation in the range comparisonNotable Point
  48. Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:59:54Why Vanguard and Iowa trade speed advantagesQ&A
  49. Bruships 217: Back from Japan 2025: Jetlag is a Myth - Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:14:08How one naval gun serves deck and belt targetsQ&A
  50. What if duing the Battle of Leyte Gulf, Vice Admiral Ching Lee does a Nelson at Copenhagen?
    1:15:54Halsey's Iowa-class battleships made activation less likelyChapter
  51. Bruships 210: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:17:47Could triple 18-inch turrets fit an Iowa-class barbette?Q&A
  52. Bruships 210: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:20:13Would 18-inch Iowa variants be retained after the war?Q&A
  53. Zumwalt Class: Defined by Procurment... Destroyed by Politics of Procurement.
    12:20From general-purpose destroyer to littoral fire supportChapter
  54. #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?
    1:33:13Iowa reused South Dakota's design to gain speed quicklyNotable Point
  55. #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?
    1:58:17South Dakota's compact layout left narrow deck passagesNotable Point
  56. Bruships 198: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:27:07An Iowa-class hull appearing in 1896Q&A
  57. Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:56:09If 1980s Iowa-class battleships appeared in 1908Q&A
  58. Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:05:36Which historic ships would be worth owning?Q&A
  59. Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?
    2:28:10Why an earlier Alaska class might have matteredNotable Point
  60. Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued
    11:43How to complete USS Kentucky and USS HawaiiQ&A
  61. Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:59:00Why six 18-inch guns are a poor Iowa-class tradeQ&A
  62. So you want to Build a Battleship today? For the 21st Century? Naval History Live
    10:27Define a modern battleship by mission, not turret countChapter
  63. So you want to Build a Battleship today? For the 21st Century? Naval History Live
    1:07:29Should the Iowa class be reactivated as an uncrewed control ship?Q&A
  64. Scuttlebutt 9 - A long time coming...
    5:19Why navies could not replace battleships with cruiser swarmsQ&A
  65. Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:28:09The last postwar battleship gunfire in angerQ&A
  66. Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:00:40How late-war fire control accounted for ship rollQ&A
  67. Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:25:53Battleship gun drills as Cold War signalingQ&A
  68. Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:12:45A 10-inch cruiser limit reshapes every treaty categoryQ&A
  69. Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:42:05North Carolina and the limits of importing a carrier designNotable Point
  70. Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:14:30Secret British or American 18-inch battleshipsQ&A
  71. Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:41:58If Iowa's 1989 turret explosion had sunk the shipQ&A
  72. Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:43:01Limits of the N3-Yamato and G3-Iowa analogyQ&A
  73. Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:05:14Why a Chinese cruiser would not revive the IowasQ&A
  74. Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...Part II
    1:24:39How a much larger Panama Canal would change US warshipsQ&A
  75. Bruships 179: Future Projects & Naval History Questions...
    59:14How the United States might answer a completed Plan ZQ&A
  76. Bruships 178: Naval History or Exercise
    2:39:31Was a large VLS battery worth adding to the Iowa class?Q&A
  77. Bruships 178: Naval History or Exercise
    2:50:05Iowa turret monitors and the future of heavy-gun presence shipsNotable Point
  78. Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?
    4:00:08If Pearl Harbor's battleships cannot returnQ&A
  79. Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?
    4:36:22Which US battleships could defeat Yamato?Q&A
  80. Scuttlebutt 8: Beatty, Sopwith Cuckoos, Carriers & the Defence Debate...
    1:01:39Why battlecruiser speed produces diminishing returnsNotable Point
  81. Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/4
    2:06:54Does Iowa's screening role make it a battlecruiser?Q&A
  82. Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/4
    2:09:31How cruiser speed shaped Iowa and early carriersQ&A
  83. World of Warships Colab 1, Questions & U Class subs: Second 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 2/4
    4:50:30How steam warships made smoke screensQ&A
  84. Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/4
    8:00:45Iowa's speed would outlast Montana's heavier batteryQ&A
  85. The Battlecruiser/Fast Battleship Differential & Soviet Carriers: Scuttlebutt 7
    23:45Lexington, Iowa, and the capital-ship spectrumQ&A
  86. Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax
    3:33:49Why naval machinery and logistics depended on fuel gradeQ&A
  87. Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!
    2:44:50Why another Iowa-class modernization is uneconomicQ&A
  88. Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!
    2:47:33How long would restarting 16-inch gun production take?Q&A
  89. Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!
    4:09:06An 8-inch AGS turns escorts into cruisersQ&A
  90. Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song
    2:40:50A nuclear strike cruiser alternative to Iowa reactivationQ&A
  91. Bruships 167: Tell me why, everything turned book – packing up, stacking up is all kalax want to do.
    1:37:11Could industry make new Iowa-class 16-inch guns?Q&A
  92. Bruships 167: Tell me why, everything turned book – packing up, stacking up is all kalax want to do.
    1:57:40Yamatos and Iowas joining the 1915 Home FleetQ&A
  93. Bruships 167: Tell me why, everything turned book – packing up, stacking up is all kalax want to do.
    3:04:53Why Long Beach was not battleship-sizedNotable Point
  94. Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....
    2:41:49Why Iowa did not regain nuclear shellsQ&A
  95. Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....
    4:07:37If the United States built Iowas, Alaskas, and MontanasQ&A
  96. Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!
    2:24:55Fair one-on-one battleship matchupsQ&A
  97. Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!
    3:35:32Why the Iowas could not serve indefinitelyQ&A
  98. What do the fleets look like if they achieve full pre-WWII Modernisation? Patreon Premier
    57:20United States: industrial scale changes the carrier raceChapter
  99. Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?
    4:23:02All four Iowa-class battleships in VietnamQ&A
  100. What would the economic impact have been if the Naval Treaties hadn't happened? Patreon Premier 1
    28:10Iowa's gun-weight dispute and the battleship spectrumNotable Point
  101. Check Campaign 19: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign
    24:41What would Warspite want in a modern warship body?Q&A
  102. Check Campaign 19: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign
    35:06Why navies retain specialized industrial capacityNotable Point
  103. Check Campaign 18: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign
    44:23Why battleship rankings hide design tradeoffsNotable Point
  104. Bruships 148: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Begins
    3:57:53Pearl Harbor losses and Iowa-Montana construction priorityQ&A
  105. Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed
    2:10:36Larger Panama locks and Iowa-class designQ&A
  106. Patreon 99: What would Imperial Star Destroyers look if designed by 1938 USN, RN, KM, IJN, RM & SN?
    2:02:39American heavy-cruiser development and Alaska's uncertain roleChapter
  107. Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered
    37:18Iowa remains a fast battleship, not a battlecruiserQ&A
  108. The Last Invasion of Britain: Battle of Fishguard(1797)
    3:00:32Panama limits make Tillman III plausible enough to change later fleetsNotable Point
  109. The Last Invasion of Britain: Battle of Fishguard(1797)
    3:04:26Tillman III and Iowa trade speed against guns and armourNotable Point
  110. Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!
    2:54:10A 16-inch Alaska would not replace Iowa's postwar prestigeQ&A
  111. Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty
    31:18Tillman III and IV as super-battleship benchmarksChapter
  112. Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty
    33:58Why battlecruiser labels need a generational baselineNotable Point
  113. Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered
    35:21Yamato intelligence and the Montana-versus-Iowa choiceQ&A
  114. Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered
    3:06:39Iowa's fast battle wing and Britain's mixed task forcesNotable Point
  115. Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered
    3:19:34Alaska's carrier-screen role and Iowa's response forceQ&A
  116. Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered
    3:21:03Why a 28-knot Montana could still be reactivatedQ&A
  117. Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered
    4:32:41Kirov as a Soviet status shipQ&A
  118. The American Carrier Raids of 1942: Wresting Control of the Pace of War from the Japanese
    1:02:32Building carrier task forces without fast battleshipsChapter
  119. Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered
    1:54:52Why Iowa overwhelmingly outmatches BismarckQ&A
  120. Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time
    2:47:26Alaska's procurement case weakened as its completion date slippedQ&A
  121. Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō
    18:30Why cruiser and carrier roles conflictedChapter
  122. Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books
    3:49:07Iowa's quadruple turrets collide with canal and dock limitsQ&A
  123. Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!
    48:30Would the US Navy retain the Montanas after the war?Q&A
  124. What Happens If Whittle is supported & Britain develops Jet Engines + Gas Turbines in 1930s
    27:43Why U.S. shipbuilding politics delay gas turbinesNotable Point
  125. Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History
    31:46Was Iowa's proposed sabot eleven or twelve inches?Q&A
  126. Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History
    1:24:49Where Iowa's assistance stops short of an autoloaderQ&A
  127. Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...
    43:26Reagan-era heavy cruisers become Kirov-scale missile and gun shipsQ&A
  128. Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...
    1:22:29Ten 15-inch guns may outthrow nine 16-inch gunsQ&A
  129. Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...
    2:12:28New Jersey could draw on former crews but would still need tugsQ&A
  130. USS Texas: Always Bigger in Spirit - KSS3 S2 Comment Response
    6:25Choosing Texas among museum battleshipsNotable Point
  131. USS Texas: Always Bigger in Spirit - KSS3 S2 Comment Response
    8:55Battleships as shore-bombardment platformsNotable Point
  132. If not Pearl Harbour?
    2:03:46Would defeat favor American carriers or new battleships?Q&A
  133. Stalingrad Class: Stalin's Ship Dreams - KSS2 S7 Comment Response
    14:39Why wartime weapons do not erase peacetime naval presenceNotable Point
  134. Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out
    1:18:53Redirecting Alaska-class resources to USS KentuckyQ&A
  135. The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response
    41:41Why 1920s technology could not produce an IowaQ&A
  136. The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response
    1:12:32Why G3 and Iowa look similar on paperQ&A
  137. Who killed the Battleship? / Why no more battleships?
    12:14A battleship still needs a task groupChapter
  138. Who killed the Battleship? / Why no more battleships?
    22:22Cost, capability, and the missing peer threatChapter
  139. Bruships 131: Battleships...
    1:38:44The Soviet trigger for 1950s battleship constructionQ&A
  140. Bruships 131: Battleships...
    1:42:31A 16-inch Jean Bart and Iowa reactivationQ&A
  141. Bruships 131: Battleships...
    2:01:24The battle needed to preserve super-battleshipsQ&A
  142. A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy
    2:17:50Why high speed consumed so much displacementQ&A
  143. Bruships 130: Battleships
    43:20Scaling a British autoloader for the Iowa classQ&A
  144. Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare
    3:13:18Why a late-war battlecruiser still needs battleship gunsQ&A
  145. Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases
    1:26:37Iowa speed made the battle line usableQ&A
  146. What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...
    1:36:24Montana, Iowa, and an enduring American doctrineChapter
  147. Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series
    10:56A new American battleship after 1950Q&A
  148. Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series
    22:45A six-inch secondary battery for a new Iowa-like battleshipQ&A
  149. Ranging & Stabilising: How Gunnery Evolved from 1860 to 1960
    56:00Heavy shells made mechanical ammunition handling essentialChapter
  150. Ranging & Stabilising: How Gunnery Evolved from 1860 to 1960
    1:08:29Ship stability was a gunnery requirementChapter
  151. Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!
    58:50Why Iowa avoided centerline 5-inch mountsQ&A
  152. H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 4
    43:23H-39 as the practical German limitNotable Point
  153. How Many Guns Does that USN Battleship have?
    12:13Fitting twenty-four 16-inch guns on Tillman IVChapter
  154. Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer
    12:54British operation of Illinois and KentuckyQ&A
  155. Montana Class, The Bulwarks for the New Battle Line: Key Ship Series 4, Part 2
    0:00Why Montana was a 28-knot battleshipChapter
  156. Montana Class, The Bulwarks for the New Battle Line: Key Ship Series 4, Part 2
    42:36Why fleet numbers mattered more than duelsNotable Point
  157. Montana Class, The Bulwarks for the New Battle Line: Key Ship Series 4, Part 2
    57:50Yamato’s resource trap in an infrastructure warNotable Point
  158. Montana Class, The Bulwarks for the New Battle Line: Key Ship Series 4, Part 2
    59:10Why 28 knots made Montana expendableChapter
  159. Montana Class, The Bulwarks for the New Battle Line: Key Ship Series 4, Part 2
    1:26:54A faster successor for carrier cooperationChapter
  160. Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?
    33:53Battlecruiser is a spectrum, not a fixed boxNotable Point
  161. Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?
    4:31:16A nominally treaty-compliant Japanese successor to YamatoQ&A
  162. Some Books Aquired So Far during #NavHistAus23! Perth Take 2!
    40:47A nine-gun American 18-inch battleshipQ&A
  163. Slava Class: Comment Response
    27:28What a P-500 hit could do to an IowaQ&A
  164. Stalins Dream Fleets & the Potential Responses
    25:24A Soviet buildup as a trigger for naval rearmamentNotable Point
  165. Stalins Dream Fleets & the Potential Responses
    51:16American choices: carriers, fast battleships, or large cruisersNotable Point
  166. Stalingrad Class Battlecruiser: Key Ships Series 2, Ship 7
    11:23The speed, armour, and gun problem Stalingrad posedNotable Point
  167. Stalingrad Class Battlecruiser: Key Ships Series 2, Ship 7
    15:01How Western navies might answer StalingradChapter
  168. Bruships 113: Jutland
    1:21:22Why Lion was not simply a British IowaQ&A
  169. Ship-Shape Special: Alex & Garius Command a Carrier... How bad can this be? Mission 2
    1:57:17Why pre-dreadnought is a retrospective labelNotable Point
  170. Bruships 111: Random Books of History
    3:24:50Raised forecastles reveal the sea a ship expectsQ&A
  171. Dragonfly Class and other Gunboats Service in WWII
    35:36Could an Iowa-class battleship serve as an Amazon gunboat?Q&A
  172. Bruships 99: Political History, Geostrategic History & Naval History
    3:23:51Soviet battleships and NATO's capital-ship reactionQ&A
  173. Bruships 97: Random Books, Naval Chat & Possibly the Sound of Rain
    1:10:05Rodney versus Missouri turns on speed, profile, and a lucky hitQ&A
  174. 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers
    32:15Iowa-class battleships reactivated for cruiser workQ&A
  175. Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat
    47:30Why massed PT boats could overwhelm an IowaQ&A
  176. Soviet Navy Part 3/3: 1965-1991 - Trying to Win Cold War before it turned Hot?
    36:42Kiev's cruiser, command, and aviation rolesChapter
  177. Soviet Navy Part 3/3: 1965-1991 - Trying to Win Cold War before it turned Hot?
    1:12:03Kirov's political pressure and the Iowa responseNotable Point
  178. Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat
    2:05:03Different requirements favor Nelson, Queen Elizabeth, or IowaQ&A
  179. Bruships 93: Soviet Navy Books & Random Books
    3:36:39Why an Iowa-class carrier conversion solves the wrong problemQ&A
  180. Sverdlov Class: Comment Response
    26:26How a larger Soviet cruiser program might have prolonged Western capital shipsQ&A
  181. Bruships 89: New Books (Christmas Recomendations) & Personal Accounts of War
    2:44:07The best wartime ship depends on its missionQ&A
  182. Bruships 86: Science Fiction Strikes Some More
    3:09:29Even an Iowa could only pause the 1910s naval raceQ&A
  183. 19th Century Cruisers: Comment Response Video 3 (Sfax - Geffion)
    33:52Clear roles make warship compromises manageableNotable Point
  184. Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 2
    1:14:23The most advanced battleship of World War IIQ&A
  185. Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-40
    35:56Which battleships could defeat a NelsonQ&A
  186. Bruships 85: Cruiser, New & Random Reading
    44:45How Soviet battlecruisers could reshape Western fleetsQ&A
  187. Bruships 85: Cruiser, New & Random Reading
    3:04:06Why the United States retained Iowas rather than AlaskasQ&A
  188. Five Weaknesses of Allied/Axis/Minor Navies in 1941 & 1942; Response to some Comments
    15:07Why Alaska paid so much displacement for speedQ&A
  189. Five Weaknesses of Allied/Axis/Minor Navies in 1941 & 1942; Response to some Comments
    36:33Iowa as the fast wing of a Montana battle lineQ&A
  190. Major Allied Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 1941
    29:10The Alaska class and finite American industryNotable Point
  191. Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times
    39:44How Lexington battlecruisers could favour the Montana classQ&A
  192. Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times
    3:17:33A fifth NATO battleship for Atlantic surface groupsQ&A
  193. Kirov Class Cruisers (Soviet Navy)
    0:05The Project 26 Kirovs and their nuclear namesakesChapter
  194. Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack
    1:09:48Guided-missile conversions for unfinished Iowa hullsQ&A
  195. Modern Frigates: Cruisers by another name? (Patreon 57 Videos Comment Response)
    22:06Iowa surface action groups still depended on carrier aviationQ&A
  196. Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 2
    12:40Why an extreme Iowa modernization would overstress the hullQ&A
  197. Bruships 80: Books From Travels
    3:30:01Iowa versus Yamato and the importance of the first hitQ&A
  198. Patreon 55: History of Survey Ships in the Royal Navy
    1:29:32Building a balanced twenty-ship historical strike forceQ&A
  199. A Historical Possibility: Triple Turret Potentiality (Battleships Lost at Jutland)
    26:07Radar fire control as a battleship vulnerabilityQ&A
  200. County Class Cruiser Comment Response: A UAD Infused Discussion of the Part 8 Response (Long Patrol)
    17:52Heavy-cruiser calibre must preserve rate of fireQ&A
  201. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)
    1:10:48Separating warship fame from design qualityQ&A
  202. Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World
    1:17:24Why the Iowa class sits near the battlecruiser boundaryQ&A
  203. Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment
    2:31:35New Jersey versus Yamato in a one-on-one fightQ&A
  204. Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament
    38:17Why prefer G3 over Iowa?Q&A
  205. Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament
    39:01Could G3 defeat Iowa?Q&A
  206. Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament
    1:29:29What did the British tower superstructure offer?Q&A
  207. Bruships 70: Travelling along...
    13:44Alaska and Iowa under different design constraintsQ&A
  208. Bruships 70: Travelling along...
    19:46What Iowa's extra beam bought over AlaskaQ&A
  209. Bruships 70: Travelling along...
    30:23Why more design time would not simply turn Iowa into AlaskaQ&A
  210. Patreon 39:What if Courageous and Glorious had survived?
    2:25:23Rodney versus Iowa in a stormy AtlanticQ&A
  211. Pearl Harbor: A product of the Kantai Kessen Doctrine or something to do?
    50:20Yamato and the missed deterrent messageNotable Point
  212. Bruships 62: Naval History Book Review & Chat
    1:26:42Battleship guns cannot be improvisedQ&A
  213. My G3/N3 Dreadnought Battleship + Battle Cruiser = Fast Battleship Design
    24:42Would the Iowa class look like battlecruisers beside Montana?Notable Point
  214. Sherman's March to the Sea
    32:18What would Dahlgren have thought of the Iowa class?Q&A
  215. Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat
    5:14:51Yamato versus Iowa depends on the wider fleetQ&A
  216. Battle of Trafalgar (216yrs Ago to the Day)
    3:47:34Modern firepower against the Trafalgar fleetQ&A
  217. Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…
    32:37Which battleships might survive a Fritz X hit?Q&A
  218. Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…
    1:20:53Why Yamato was not designed to fight two IowasQ&A
  219. Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…
    1:43:06Why new battleships suffered vibration and other teething problemsQ&A
  220. Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…
    1:55:00Iowa class at the end of the fast-battleship lineChapter
  221. Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...
    2:42Ammunition limits Iowa's anti-aircraft gun countQ&A
  222. Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)
    1:01:45Queen Elizabeth versus Iowa: measuring a battleship's valueQ&A
  223. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (5)
    2:25:39Why the Iowa class looks like a battlecruiser beside MontanaQ&A
  224. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (3)
    4:34:54Why more battleships would not solve VietnamQ&A
  225. Patreon 29: Coastal Defence Ships
    3:13:54Why did the US Navy retain the Iowa class so long?Q&A
  226. Bruships 52: A Year of Bruships - Questions & Books
    2:46:01Why nuclear artillery would be excessive for an IowaQ&A
  227. Hawker Aircraft of the 1920s & 1930s
    2:13:20Where the Iowa class sits on a battleship-battlecruiser spectrumQ&A
  228. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out?
    1:17:28Faster US battleships built around 14-inch gunsQ&A
  229. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out?
    1:22:19Why an untouched Iowa reserve would be hard to reactivate todayQ&A
  230. Patreon 22: If the Cold War went hot in 1986 would NATO's navies keep the Altantic Going?
    2:20:34How might Iowa-class battleships be used?Q&A
  231. Patreon 6 - Force K… Malta’s mailed fist, as proposed by Ian Car
    40:15Would Iowa have changed the Battle of North Cape?Q&A
  232. Bru Ships Episode 15: Diplomacy & When it Fails, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A
    47:36Vanguard's design compromises and a 16-inch alternativeQ&A
  233. Bru Ships Episode 15: Diplomacy & When it Fails, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A
    1:05:00What point-blank range does to battleship protectionQ&A
  234. Bru Ships Episode 9: Super Power Contest (as in the nations) Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A
    49:18Where a modernised Iowa might fight in the Cold WarQ&A
  235. Bru Ships Episode 3: Imperial Japanese Navy Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A
    2:59:14Lion versus Iowa: judging battleships by fleet doctrineQ&A