Related time notes
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live42:29An enlarged Daring with another twin 4.5-inch mountQ&A
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:07:53Designing a larger Leander successor with ASROCQ&A
- Rise of the Frigate Navies: Why so many nations are going Frigate and why others want them as well!25:35Fast-frigate conversions and the Type 12 familyChapter
- Rise of the Frigate Navies: Why so many nations are going Frigate and why others want them as well!40:08Type 23 outlives its Cold War task-group assumptionsChapter
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:16:58A heavily armed Type 45 design exerciseQ&A
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live47:39Hood's proposed secondary mountsQ&A
- Air Defence At Sea: From Air Ships in 1906, to drones in 2026 and everything in between...1:58:09Why Royal Navy gun standardisation kept restartingQ&A
- Air Defence At Sea: From Air Ships in 1906, to drones in 2026 and everything in between...2:01:21Revisiting wartime guns and a 5.25-inch Daring alternativeQ&A
- What if Britain joined with Australian & Canada to build a 'Maximum' Invincible Class instead?31:34Layered air defence and different gun rangesNotable Point
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 215:48Naval gunfire, field batteries, and ammunition supplyNotable Point
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 242:20Would an 18-inch gun make a useful anti-submarine mortar?Q&A
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 26:55Arming a hypothetical 1988 Royal Navy cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 22:47:10Could Britain have built more Tribal-class destroyers?Q&A
- The Perils of Standardisation: Can Navy's Standardise too much? (Patreon Premier)1:39Royal Navy gun standardization created more variationChapter
- The Perils of Standardisation: Can Navy's Standardise too much? (Patreon Premier)2:12Why one gun calibre did not guarantee one fleet standardNotable Point
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:56:38A 144-cell extended Type 45 conceptQ&A
- Ideal Destroyers: Screening Fleets & National Interests from 1890 to Today48:54Postwar destroyers combine dual-purpose guns and ASW weaponsNotable Point
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...27:33County class destroyers kept presence and air defence togetherChapter
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...49:16Type 82 was conceived as a fleet leader and presence shipChapter
- Bruships 242: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:26:01How larger main guns could make room for 3-inch weaponsNotable Point
- What if the Royal Navy's Aircraft Carrier HMS Hermes had sisters in the 1920s? (Patreon Live)2:06:13Which heavy anti-aircraft gun suits a carrier?Q&A
- Bruships 233: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:27:55Royal Navy dual-purpose guns and the Dido roleQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:59:13Why the Royal Navy accumulated so many gun calibresQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 18: Guns & Points of Order1:49Why the Royal Navy fielded so many gun calibresQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 18: Guns & Points of Order53:29The proposed Sea Wolf-equipped Batch 4 Type 42Notable Point
- More Lessons of Never Built Carriers10:18The Royal Navy's unrealized 1931 carrier studyChapter
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle6:35:36Why Renown's selected game fit loses much of its 4.5-inch batteryNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II2:49:39Why Britain's preferred dual-purpose guns still complicated supplyNotable Point
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age4:43Daring class as the peak Royal Navy gun destroyerChapter
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age1:05:06Daring and County armament exposes Type 82's redundancy gapNotable Point
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...20:19A heavily armed Black Swan escortQ&A
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why24:54Britain's 4.5-inch path to a true dual-purpose gunChapter
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why30:19The 4.5-inch Mark V: powered loading and barrel lifeNotable Point
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why1:06:28Why the 5-inch/38 succeeded as a complete systemChapter
- Bruships 209: Science Fiction Naval History Questions Answered Live...58:37Why some 4.5-inch shells carried spiral groovesQ&A
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?1:01Why the early 4.5-inch mount was difficult for destroyersChapter
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?3:25Royal Navy gun diversity reflected changing prioritiesNotable Point
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?4:52How abundant funding could delay gun standardizationNotable Point
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?7:03The alternate history requires a 1935 service-ready gunChapter
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?10:104.7-inch and 4.5-inch performance depended on the mountChapter
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?14:34Henderson's carrier experience challenges a false exercise lessonNotable Point
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?15:15A hybrid mount could make the 4.5-inch gun practicalChapter
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?20:02Standardization spreads beyond the Tribal classChapter
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?24:26Could 4.5-inch guns replace the 5.25-inch battery?Chapter
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?28:38A ubiquitous British dual-purpose gunNotable Point
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?30:32Fleet standardization changes weapons available to escortsNotable Point
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?33:10An all-4.5-inch Dido could trade shell weight for gun densityNotable Point
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?35:41Prewar exercises expose mount and ammunition problemsChapter
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?37:11Narvik and Gurkha show the tactical value of high elevationChapter
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?41:43How heavy anti-aircraft fire disrupts an air strikeChapter
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?45:32Operation Substance tests the fleet-wide air-defense effectChapter
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?49:39Modified Tribals become a wartime fleet backboneChapter
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?54:10Small air-defense gains compound across a long warNotable Point
- Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:15:27Why Royal Navy carriers carried substantial gun batteriesQ&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:58:02An Australian naval-gun factory before World War IIQ&A
- Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?58:23Scylla and Charybdis tested the 4.5-inch upper-deck mountingNotable Point
- Bring in the Heavies... AA Cruisers in WWII, what was their value?1:04:33Why did the 4.5-inch UD mount disappoint?Q&A
- Bruships 191: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:43:41What a Short Hellcat missile would add to Royal Navy escortsQ&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:00:25Cold War dual-purpose guns retained a surface-fire roleNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!44:08Daring versus Forrest Sherman as postwar gun destroyersQ&A
- Leadership Alive: What happens if Adm R. Henderson & Adm W. Fisher Live through WWII?43:28A large L class could anticipate the Battle-class destroyerNotable Point
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...19:00An enlarged Ark Royal design with room for about 90 aircraftNotable Point
- Bruships 179: Future Projects & Naval History Questions...2:39:05Would a 5-inch gun refit make sense for the Type 45?Q&A
- Bruships 178: Naval History or Exercise4:26:26Could Hedgehog-style ASW weapons return?Q&A
- What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?40:20F3 speed and common ammunition offered peacetime and wartime flexibilityChapter
- A Hearts of Iron Christmas... For Shipshape & Christmas, it's HOI4 with @GariusTheBrit28:49Enterprise's British gun mounts and a possible American refitNotable Point
- A Hearts of Iron Christmas... For Shipshape & Christmas, it's HOI4 with @GariusTheBrit47:41Was HMS Enterprise considered for HMS Victorious's American voyage?Q&A
- The Royal Navy's Spirit Ship: HMS Tiger(1913) - Key Ships Series 9, Ship 91:15:07The case for preserving and modernizing TigerChapter
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/48:09:18Upper-deck Tribal mounts and the Battle class's alternativeQ&A
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/48:16:57Dido-class 4.5-inch refits and disputed wartime gun fitsQ&A
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/41:47:29Nine 9.2-inch guns on a small Second World War warshipQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/41:49:07A 1934 plan to rationalize Royal Navy gun calibersQ&A
- Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax1:35:08Why Britain preferred 4.5-inch to 4.7-inch dual-purpose gunsQ&A
- Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax4:38:53Why twin 6-inch guns were possible but awkward on early Town cruisersQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 5: Some Tremendous Questions & Frustrations!43:20Why Royal Navy anti-aircraft standardisation laggedQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 5: Some Tremendous Questions & Frustrations!46:53Royal Navy AA conversions in a war delayed to 1942Q&A
- HMAS Melbourne and HMCS Bonaventure36:02The interwar development behind light fleet carriersNotable Point
- Check Campaign 26: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign47:04Why choose a 5.5-inch gun over a 6-inch gun?Q&A
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 347:37Armament, endurance, and wartime growth marginsChapter
- Carriers of the Planned War Fleets: How Shokaku, Implacables & Essexs reflect their Navys Doctrines41:53Implacable's anti-aircraft batteries and uncertain countsNotable Point
- Patreon 103: The Nightmare returns - 4 WWI Town class are discovered by the Royal Navy in 193850:11Why not fit 4.5-inch guns?Q&A
- Patreon 103: The Nightmare returns - 4 WWI Town class are discovered by the Royal Navy in 19381:57:30Designing a purpose-built cruiser-destroyer successorChapter
- Patreon 103: The Nightmare returns - 4 WWI Town class are discovered by the Royal Navy in 19382:11:00Triple mounts and inconsistent turret terminologyNotable Point
- Patreon 103: The Nightmare returns - 4 WWI Town class are discovered by the Royal Navy in 19382:26:52Why the first cruiser-destroyer simulation failsChapter
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion24:24Lexington's eight-inch guns and the case for escortsNotable Point
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!4:24:57The 4.5-inch Mark 5 offered a strong dual-purpose baselineQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered3:55:47A proposed dual-purpose gun and pom-pom layoutQ&A
- Check Campaign 3: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign25:15Could Britain have chosen a better dual-purpose gun route?Q&A
- Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!16:02Mount weight kept the 4.5-inch gun off the Tribal classQ&A
- Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!30:17A workable 4.5-inch mount would close the Tribal class's high-angle gapQ&A
- Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!38:27Battle-class destroyers carried a formidable anti-drone gun batteryQ&A
- Patreon 92: Frank Whittle is given consistent funding by Britain to develop jet engines from 19281:33:52Six parallel gun calibres expose a procurement problemNotable Point
- HMS Diamond(1950) D35: Presence without Conviction is no Detterence - Key Ship Series 7 Ship 824:16The Daring class's 4.5-inch dual-purpose batteryChapter
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History21:41The Mark 71 already outranged a modernized Mark 8Notable Point
- Stalingrad Class: Stalin's Ship Dreams - KSS2 S7 Comment Response22:16A NATO command cruiser as the peacetime answerNotable Point
- What Happens if 1930s Germany Standardises on the Scharnhorst hull for Capital Ships & Carriers?52:42Exercise assumptions hid the Tribal's air-defence weaknessNotable Point
- Patreon 88: Sydney Strategy: When looking for a Far East Naval Base - what if Sydney not Singapore?2:06:08A slimmer King George V favors 4.5-inch gunsNotable Point
- Scylla & Charybdis: 4.5in gun Didos - Key Ships Reserve Series, Ship 16:01A Dido hull reshaped around 4.5-inch mountsNotable Point
- Scylla & Charybdis: 4.5in gun Didos - Key Ships Reserve Series, Ship 110:03An emergency answer to the 5.25-inch shortageChapter
- Scylla & Charybdis: 4.5in gun Didos - Key Ships Reserve Series, Ship 112:16Why fixed 4.5-inch ammunition suited cruisers betterNotable Point
- Scylla & Charybdis: 4.5in gun Didos - Key Ships Reserve Series, Ship 124:49What a successful dual-purpose mount might have changedNotable Point
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 104:05:31Gun count could not rescue an under-protected battlecruiserNotable Point
- Neptune Class: The Cruiser Conundrum Crisis - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 619:16Neptune's speed, range, and weapons packageChapter
- Neptune Class: The Cruiser Conundrum Crisis - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 628:06What a 1937 Neptune could have changedNotable Point
- Bruships: Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!53:09Why the Weapon class retained twin 4-inch gunsQ&A
- Testing out Lion Class & Potential Lion Class Successors on UAD36:22Building a 36-knot battlecruiser around its missionChapter
- HMS Illustrious: Key Ships Series 3, Ship 730:06Breaking up an air attackNotable Point
- Meeting HMAS Vampire!1:39The Daring class as a Tribal successorNotable Point
- Some Books Aquired So Far in #NavHistAus23! Brisbane17:40Why Tribal destroyers kept torpedoesQ&A
- The Shipwreck Museum - The Destroyer Models #NavHistAus 20:09Dual-purpose guns make a flexible destroyerNotable Point
- Building a NelRod County Class...44:51A 9.2-inch Hawkins-class alternativeChapter
- Building a NelRod County Class...1:17:07A scaled-down York with 9.2-inch gunsNotable Point
- Starting with Building HMS Thunderchild...37:13A light cruiser built around massed 5.5-inch fireChapter
- Starting with Building HMS Thunderchild...57:48Testing the machine-gun cruiserNotable Point
- Alternate History - Royal Navy retains the Fleet 'units' of Royal Naval Air Service: Patreon 762:03:12Carrier experience drives better destroyer air defenceNotable Point
- Still Trying to deal with the Inadvertently Created Super Bismarck19:03Fitting 4.5-inch, Bofors, and Oerlikon batteries around the main gunsNotable Point
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas2:29Inspecting the Queen Elizabeth MaximusChapter
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas1:32:20Would a refitted Agincourt retain torpedoes?Q&A
- UAD: 18in gun Agincourt & Other Ideas1:32:44Giving Agincourt a Warspite-style modernizationNotable Point
- UAD: Queen Elizabeth Maximus & Other Ideas1:13:51Choosing secondaries for the King George V alternativeNotable Point
- Christmas Comment Response: HMCS Sackville, Descartes & some 60s shorts1:394.7-inch dual-purpose mount tradeoffsQ&A
- Christmas Comment Response: HMCS Sackville, Descartes & some 60s shorts27:23Practical 4.7-inch versus 4.5-inch rates of fireQ&A
- Christmas Comment Response: HMCS Sackville, Descartes & some 60s shorts34:25Repulse refit, dual-purpose guns, and Force ZNotable Point
- Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-6549:19Gun standardization still has legacy limitsQ&A
- Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-651:01:51Treaty weight constrained enclosed Tribal-class mountsQ&A
- Top 5 Inventions that came too Late14:25Dual-purpose guns before Norway and the MediterraneanChapter
- New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...1:55:17Reliability kept the 4.5-inch Mark 6 in serviceQ&A
- What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?5:39How the failed five-inch project split British gun developmentNotable Point
- What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?12:26The performance case for a high-angle 4.7-inch gunChapter
- What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?19:07Capital ships and carriers join the common-gun fleetChapter
- What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?41:45An existing 4.5-inch plan makes mass conversion credibleNotable Point
- What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?46:06A common calibre makes wartime supply more resilientChapter
- What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?1:03:12Redirecting 4.5-inch investment into the common gunNotable Point
- What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?1:05:26Why the Royal Navy kept specialist gun solutionsNotable Point
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat3:31:16Postwar naval guns worth retainingQ&A
- Sverdlov Class: Comment Response56:19How more Sverdlovs could have reshaped British gun cruisersNotable Point
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 22:29:23The 4.5-inch gun Britain most needed in 1936Q&A
- Bruships 84: Science Fiction Strikes Again1:59:32What could replace the Anson subclass's six-inch guns?Q&A
- Major Allied Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 193949:53Removing radar, turbine, and gun-production bottlenecksNotable Point
- Patreon 59: Infrastructure in the Colonies: shipyards of the Commonwealth and Empire.1:54:34Sloop orders could accelerate a four-and-a-half-inch gun mountNotable Point
- Ruse de guerre26:57Could a 4.5-inch mount have improved Abdiel?Notable Point
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)2:04:09How continuous destroyer building could accelerate the 4.5-inch gunQ&A
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)37:20Carrier ceilings and a one-fifth building capChapter
- Torpedoes and their Ships 1900-39: Patreon 54 (Long Patrol)36:32Night attacks, Long Lance, and the supply problemChapter
- 2022 Canada Naval History Trip Reading List (Long Patrol Book Review)32:11HMS Savage as a Battle-class gun test bedNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)28:39Commonwealth demand for Battle-class destroyersQ&A
- Bruships 75: Following the 614th Running the Gauntlet1:41:36How Admiralty offices divided responsibility for naval gunsQ&A
- 1939 Destroyer Doctrine: Patreon 50 (Long Patrol)7:08Technology and exercises can mislead doctrineNotable Point
- 1939 Destroyer Doctrine: Patreon 50 (Long Patrol)56:33Royal Navy destroyers for global commitmentsChapter
- 1939 Destroyer Doctrine: Patreon 50 (Long Patrol)59:50Fleet Air Arm bureaucracy and the missing 4.5-inch gunQ&A
- 1939 Destroyer Doctrine: Patreon 50 (Long Patrol)1:02:33A wartime 4.5-inch mount and the doctrine built around itNotable Point
- Patreon 50: 1939 Destroyer Doctrine of the combatant navies & Where did it come from?2:32:57Air attack forced British destroyer armament to changeNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)1:27:57A heavier dual-purpose Tribal without losing torpedoesQ&A
- Siege of Corfu (1798–1799): 223 yrs ago today10:23What unusual ordnance might HMS Coventry have carried?Q&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (10)2:49:09A Royal Navy without pre-war weapon-development delaysQ&A
- Youtube Vote 1: The 1905-1906 and the 1911 Morocco Crises2:15:26Turning an Abdiel-class minelayer into a super-destroyerQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)1:14:37Electrical power as a hidden naval advantage before World War IIQ&A
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 11/11 The Whiskey War0:30Whitby and the specialist convoy escortChapter
- Shipbuilding through the 1880s-1950s2:15:21What earlier 4.5-inch guns could have changedNotable Point
- Shipbuilding through the 1880s-1950s2:53:42Small components that delayed major warshipsNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (4)4:14:46The 5-inch/38 and British 4.5-inch gunQ&A
- William Agnew: Patreon 21, Notable Commanders, Long Patrol Part 312:56Aurora and the Arethusa-class cruiser balanceNotable Point
- Minotaur & Tiger Class Cruisers1:58:16Why the Royal Navy stayed with 4.5-inch gunsQ&A
- Crown Colony Class Long Patrol: Part 4 Ceylon to Newfoundland2:17How technology forecasts shaped Crown Colony cruiser designChapter
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response25:46Why an unrestricted gun race might revive mixed batteriesQ&A
- Bruships 31: Some more Science Fiction from a Naval Historians Perspective...3:40:45L9 destroyers and earlier adoption of the 4.5-inch gunQ&A
- Town Class Part 7 of 7: Edinburghs & Legacy0:59Edinburgh and Belfast's quadruple-turret design pathChapter
- RN Paper Cruisers; the what might have beens…1:55:09Why the Royal Navy retained its 4.5-inch gunQ&A
- Patreon 10: “If the Trent affair had gone hot, how badly would it have gone for the US navy?"2:46:36Possible Type 32 gun and radar changesQ&A
- Bruships 24 - An Autobiography from War1:09:51Why Tribals did not simply receive 4.5-inch dual-purpose gunsQ&A
- Battle of Trafalgar & it's Legacy2:32:08Why Tribals paired heavy guns with quadruple torpedoesQ&A
- HMS Formidable: A Special Chat With Jamie from Armoured Carriers11:28Radar height and a layered anti-aircraft screenNotable Point
- HMS Formidable: A Special Chat With Jamie from Armoured Carriers1:04:41Two one-ton bombs strike FormidableChapter
- HMS Formidable: A Special Chat With Jamie from Armoured Carriers1:20:18Damage control keeps the carrier flyingChapter
- Patreon Video 4: Tsingtao 1939 Goes Hot...3:06:02How a Pacific war could reshape Royal Navy ship designNotable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5c Introduction to Patreon Video 47:39Dido-class cruisers expose the cost of treaty-limited hullsNotable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5c Introduction to Patreon Video 431:56Rebuilding E-class cruisers for raider and convoy workChapter
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5b Introduction to Patreon Video 410:34Rearming reserve cruisers for the Pacific emergencyNotable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5b Introduction to Patreon Video 412:59An old cruiser makes convoy attacks costlyNotable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5b Introduction to Patreon Video 416:33Could E-class cruisers carry a mixed battery?Notable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5b Introduction to Patreon Video 424:48Hawkins hulls offer room for a heavier conversionChapter
- 50th Live Special: Thank You1:02:21The D-class anti-aircraft conversion war interruptedNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 2: Battle Class (+Stanley Goodall)12:19Capital-ship 4.5-inch mounts in a destroyerNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 2: Battle Class (+Stanley Goodall)16:17Why the main armament faced forwardNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 2: Battle Class (+Stanley Goodall)17:59A cautious theory about the heavy mountsNotable Point
- An Introduction to “Back Pocket Cruisers” Part 1: Tribal Class (+Admiral Henderson)18:39The gun-mount compromise behind the Tribal classNotable Point
- An Introduction to the "D" Class Cruisers Part 2 of 212:03The unrealised anti-aircraft cruiser refitChapter
- An Introduction to the "D" Class Cruisers Part 2 of 216:09How Spanish Civil War duties delayed modernizationNotable Point
- An Introduction to Not the Big Ships: NGFS As Provided by Destroyers & Below Part 2 of 213:18Frigate guns as mobile artillery batteriesNotable Point
- An Introduction to Not the Big Ships: NGFS As Provided by Destroyers & Below Part 2 of 216:11Single versus twin naval gun mountsNotable Point
- An Introduction to Not the Big Ships: NGFS As Provided by Destroyers & Below Part 2 of 218:28The Type 22's post-Falklands gun lessonChapter
- An Introduction to What was paid for in Blood, in Sweat, in Tears & so much Money... Part 3 of 317:25Exercise incentives concealed air-defence weaknessesChapter
- Bru Ships Episode 4: Naval Aviation Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A3:37:39Best naval gun depends on the metricQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 3: Imperial Japanese Navy Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:13:21A peacetime 1942 Royal Navy under Reginald HendersonQ&A
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers - A live stream19:26Deck-penetrating turrets shaped the Battle-class layoutChapter
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers - A live stream21:09Why the Battle class lacked a stern main turretNotable Point
- Back Pocket Cruisers Presentation (Practice 2)34:35The Daring class completed the move to general-purpose destroyersChapter